In the Matter of Certain Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets, Transmitter and Receiver (Radio) Chips, Power Control Chips, and Products Containing Same, Including Cellular Telephone Handsets; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement, 31975-31976 [E9-15891]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 127 / Monday, July 6, 2009 / Notices public hearings that were addressed for inclusion in the PR/FEIS. Where appropriate, revisions were made in response to specific comments. No decision will be made on the proposed Federal action until at least 30 days after release of the PR/FEIS. After the 30-day waiting period, Reclamation will complete a Record of Decision. The Record of Decision will state which alternative analyzed in the PR/FEIS will be implemented and discuss all factors leading to that decision. Dated: June 5, 2009. Larry Walkoviak, Regional Director—UC Region. [FR Doc. E9–15650 Filed 7–2–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1012 (Review)] Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From Vietnam; Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Background The Commission instituted this review on July 1, 2008 (73 FR 37487) and determined on October 6, 2008 that it would conduct a full review (73 FR 62318, October 20, 2008). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s review and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on January 15, 2009 (74 FR 2616). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on May 6, 2009, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on June 26, 2009. The views of the Commission are 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:06 Jul 02, 2009 Jkt 217001 contained in USITC Publication 4083 (June 2009), entitled Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam: Investigation No. 731–TA–1012 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 26, 2009. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–15797 Filed 7–2–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–543 (Remand Proceeding) (Enforcement Proceeding)] In the Matter of Certain Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets, Transmitter and Receiver (Radio) Chips, Power Control Chips, and Products Containing Same, Including Cellular Telephone Handsets; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 74) granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–1999. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 21, 2005, the Commission instituted an investigation under section 337 of the PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 31975 Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a complaint filed by Broadcom Corporation (‘‘Broadcom’’) of Irvine, California, alleging a violation of section 337 in the importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain baseband processor chips and chipsets, transmitter and receiver (radio) chips, power control chips, and products containing same, including cellular telephone handsets by reason of infringement of five patents. 70 FR 35707 (June 21, 2005). Broadcom named Qualcomm Incorporated (‘‘Qualcomm’’) of San Diego, California as the only respondent. On December 8, 2006, the Commission affirmed the ALJ’s final ID finding a violation due to infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,714,983. On June 7, 2007 the Commission issued a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order to Qualcomm. Qualcomm appealed the Commission’s determination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (‘‘Federal Circuit’’) on August 7, 2007, which appeal was consolidated under the lead case Kyocera Wireless Corp. v. International Trade Commission, Nos. 2007–1492, et al. (‘‘Kyocera’’). On November 9, 2007, Broadcom filed an enforcement complaint pursuant to Commission Rule 210.75, alleging, inter alia, that Qualcomm has violated and continues to violate the Commission’s cease and desist order. Based on Broadcom’s complaint, the Commission instituted the enforcement proceeding on December 28, 2007. 72 FR 73879 (Dec. 28, 2007). On October 14, 2008, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in Kyocera, remanding the underlying investigation to the Commission. On May 6, 2009, Broadcom and Qualcomm jointly moved to terminate this investigation based upon a settlement agreement, pursuant to Commission rule 210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). On May 15, 2009, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the joint motion to terminate the investigation. On June 11, 2009, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the joint motion to terminate the investigation. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Dated: Issued: June 30, 2009. E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1 31976 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 127 / Monday, July 6, 2009 / Notices By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–15891 Filed 7–2–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1121–0065] Bureau of Justice Statistics; Agency Information Collection Activities: Existing Collection; Comments Requested mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection; National Corrections Reporting Program. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. The proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register, Volume 74, Number 80, Pages 19238–19239, on April 28, 2009. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ‘‘thirty days’’. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact William J. Sabol, Ph.D., Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531 (phone: 202–514–1062). Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: — Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; — Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; — Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:06 Jul 02, 2009 Jkt 217001 — Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: National Corrections Reporting Program. The collection includes the forms: Prisoner Admission Report, Prisoner Release Report, Parole Release Report, Prisoner in Custody at Year-end. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form number(s): NCRP–1A, NCRP–1B, NCRP–1C, and NCRP–1D. Corrections Statistics Unit, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, United States Department of Justice. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: The National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP) is the only national data collection furnishing annual individual-level information for State prisoners admitted or released during the year, those in custody at year-end, and persons discharged from parole supervision. The NCRP collects data on sentencing, time served in prison and on parole, offense, admission/release type, and demographic information. BJS, the Congress, researchers, and criminal justice practitioners use these data to describe annual movements of adult offenders through State correctional systems. Providers of the data are personnel in the State Departments of Corrections and Parole. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: BJS anticipates 51 respondents for report year 2009 with a total annual burden of 2,254 hours. For each type of information previously provided, respondents will require an average of 8 hours to provide information on prisoner admissions and releases, 8 hours to provide information on parole releases, and 8 hours to provide information on the year-end custody prisoner population. This includes time for modifying and re-running previously written computer programs, preparing input data, and documenting the record layout. For each type of information PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 being supplied for the first time, each respondent will require an average of 24 hours to provide information on prisoner admissions and releases, 24 hours to provide information on parole releases, and 24 hours to provide information on the year-end custody prisoner population. This includes time for developing, testing, and running new computer programs, preparing input data, and documenting the record layout. Each respondent will require an additional 2 hours documenting or explaining the data for a total of 2,254 burden hours. Magnetic media or other electronic formats are expected from all 51 respondents. The total annual burden is expected to decrease for 2010 and beyond, when computer programs written to provide data for 2009 for the first time, are rerun. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 2,254 total burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: June 30, 2009. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, PRA, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E9–15809 Filed 7–2–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1497] Proposed Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System Standard AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, DOJ. ACTION: Notice of Proposed Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System Standard. SUMMARY: In an effort to obtain comments from interested parties, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) will make available to the general public an initial draft standard entitled, ‘‘Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System Standard.’’ The opportunity to provide comments on this document is open to industry technical representatives; public safety agencies and organizations; forensic video analysts; research, development E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM 06JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 127 (Monday, July 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31975-31976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-15891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-543 (Remand Proceeding) (Enforcement Proceeding)]


In the Matter of Certain Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets, 
Transmitter and Receiver (Radio) Chips, Power Control Chips, and 
Products Containing Same, Including Cellular Telephone Handsets; Notice 
of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination 
Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 74) 
granting a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a 
settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel E. Valencia, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-1999. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 21, 2005, the Commission instituted 
an investigation under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 
1337, based on a complaint filed by Broadcom Corporation (``Broadcom'') 
of Irvine, California, alleging a violation of section 337 in the 
importation, sale for importation, and sale within the United States 
after importation of certain baseband processor chips and chipsets, 
transmitter and receiver (radio) chips, power control chips, and 
products containing same, including cellular telephone handsets by 
reason of infringement of five patents. 70 FR 35707 (June 21, 2005). 
Broadcom named Qualcomm Incorporated (``Qualcomm'') of San Diego, 
California as the only respondent. On December 8, 2006, the Commission 
affirmed the ALJ's final ID finding a violation due to infringement of 
U.S. Patent No. 6,714,983. On June 7, 2007 the Commission issued a 
limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order to Qualcomm. 
Qualcomm appealed the Commission's determination to the U.S. Court of 
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``Federal Circuit'') on August 7, 
2007, which appeal was consolidated under the lead case Kyocera 
Wireless Corp. v. International Trade Commission, Nos. 2007-1492, et 
al. (``Kyocera'').
    On November 9, 2007, Broadcom filed an enforcement complaint 
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.75, alleging, inter alia, that Qualcomm 
has violated and continues to violate the Commission's cease and desist 
order. Based on Broadcom's complaint, the Commission instituted the 
enforcement proceeding on December 28, 2007. 72 FR 73879 (Dec. 28, 
2007). On October 14, 2008, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion in 
Kyocera, remanding the underlying investigation to the Commission.
    On May 6, 2009, Broadcom and Qualcomm jointly moved to terminate 
this investigation based upon a settlement agreement, pursuant to 
Commission rule 210.21 (19 CFR 210.21). On May 15, 2009, the Commission 
investigative attorney filed a response in support of the joint motion 
to terminate the investigation.
    On June 11, 2009, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the joint 
motion to terminate the investigation. No petitions for review of the 
ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject 
ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in section 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    Dated: Issued: June 30, 2009.


[[Page 31976]]


    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-15891 Filed 7-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.