In the Matter of Certain Mobile Telephones and Wireless Communication Devices Featuring Digital Cameras, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 29716 [E9-14665]

Download as PDF 29716 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 23, 2009 / Notices the Refuges for the next 15 years. Alternative A was the no-action alternative, which described current Refuge management activities. Alternative B placed greater emphasis on biological resources than on visitor services. Alternative C (the selected alternative) provided an optimal balance of improved biological resource objectives and expanded visitor services opportunities. Alternative D placed greater emphasis on visitor services than on biological resources. The Service received 75 comment letters on the Draft CCP and EA during the review period. The comments received were incorporated into the CCP when possible, and we responded to the comments in an appendix to the CCP. In the FONSI, Alternative C was selected for implementation and is the basis for the CCP. The FONSI documents the decision of the Service and is based on the information and analysis contained in the EA. Under the selected alternative, the Refuges would achieve an optimal balance of biological resource objectives and visitor services opportunities. Habitat management and associated biological resource monitoring would be improved. Visitor service opportunities would focus on quality wildlifedependant recreation distributed throughout the Refuges. In addition, environmental education, interpretation, wildlife observation, photography, and hunting programs would be improved and/or expanded. The selected alternative best meets the Refuges’ purposes, vision and goals; contributes to the Refuge System mission; addresses the significant issues and relevant mandates; and is consistent with principles of sound fish and wildlife management. Public Availability of Documents In addition to the methods in you can view or obtain documents at the following locations: • Our Web site: http:// sacramentovalleyrefuges.fws.gov. • Public Libraries: during regular library hours, at the following libraries: ADDRESSES, Phone number Library Address Bayliss Library ............................................................ Butte County Library .................................................. Butte County Public Library ....................................... Colusa County Library ............................................... Colusa County Library ............................................... Corning Library ........................................................... Orland City Library ..................................................... Sutter County Library ................................................. Willows Public Library ................................................ 7830 County Road 39, Glenn, CA 95943 ............................................ 1108 Sherman Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 ........................................... 1820 Mitchell Avenue, Oroville, CA 5966 ............................................ 738 Market Street, Colusa, CA 95932 ................................................. 232 Prince Street, Princeton, CA 95970 .............................................. 740 3rd Street, Corning, CA 96021 ...................................................... 333 Mill Street, Orland, CA 95963 ....................................................... 750 Forbes Avenue, Yuba City, CA 95991 .......................................... 201 North Lassen Street, Willows, CA 95988 ...................................... Dated: June 17, 2009. Margaret T. Kolar, Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento, California. [FR Doc. E9–14662 Filed 6–22–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–663] In the Matter of Certain Mobile Telephones and Wireless Communication Devices Featuring Digital Cameras, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 14) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) in the above-captioned investigation granting leave to complainant Eastman Kodak Co. (‘‘Kodak’’) to amend its complaint and the notice of investigation to assert VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:15 Jun 22, 2009 Jkt 217001 an additional patent claim in the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul M. Bartkowski, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5432. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on December 18, 2008, based on a complaint filed by complainant Kodak of Rochester, New York. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United States, PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 530–934–2287 530–891–2762 530–538–7641 530–458–7671 530–439–2235 530–824–7050 530–865–1640 530–822–7137 530–934–5156 the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain mobile telephones and wireless communication devices that infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,493,335 (‘‘the ’335 patent’’) and 6,292,218. The complaint named Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics USA; and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc. On May 26, 2009, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting Kodak’s motion for leave to amend the complaint and the notice of investigation to assert claim 12 of the ’335 patent. No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: June 17, 2009. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–14665 Filed 6–22–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM 23JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 29716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14665]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-663]


In the Matter of Certain Mobile Telephones and Wireless 
Communication Devices Featuring Digital Cameras, and Components 
Thereof; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 14) issued by the presiding administrative law 
judge (``ALJ'') in the above-captioned investigation granting leave to 
complainant Eastman Kodak Co. (``Kodak'') to amend its complaint and 
the notice of investigation to assert an additional patent claim in the 
investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul M. Bartkowski, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5432. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on 
December 18, 2008, based on a complaint filed by complainant Kodak of 
Rochester, New York. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain mobile telephones and wireless 
communication devices that infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 
5,493,335 (``the '335 patent'') and 6,292,218. The complaint named 
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; 
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; LG Electronics, Inc.; LG 
Electronics USA; and LG Electronics MobileComm USA, Inc.
    On May 26, 2009, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting Kodak's 
motion for leave to amend the complaint and the notice of investigation 
to assert claim 12 of the '335 patent. No petitions for review were 
filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
(19 CFR 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: June 17, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-14665 Filed 6-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P