Notice of Partial Rescission, Intent To Rescind and Extension of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China, 29178-29179 [E9-14472]
Download as PDF
29178
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 117 / Friday, June 19, 2009 / Notices
2. American Pioneer Shipping.
3. Beijing Jim International Food Co.,
Ltd.
4. Burgeon International Inc.
5. Fujian Meitan Import & Export
Xiamen Corporation.
6. Jining Meiya Foods Co., Ltd.
7. Jining Trans-High Trading Co., Ltd.
8. Jinxian County Huaguang Food
Import & Export Co., Ltd.
9. Junan Auto Imp and Exp Co., Ltd.
10. Linyi Futai Foodstuff Co., Ltd.
11. Marnex (HongKong) Company.
12. New Future International Trading
Co.
13. Omni Decor China Ltd.
14. Qingdao Rock-It Sports Inc.
15. Sea Trade International
Incorporated.
16. Shandong Chengshun Farm Produce
Trading Co., Ltd.
17. Shandong Chenhe Int’l Trading Co.,
Ltd.
18. Shandong Dongsheng Eastsun Foods
Co., Ltd.
19. Shandong Garlic Company.
20. Shanghai New Long March
International Trade Co., Ltd.
21. Shenzhen Greening Trading Co.,
Ltd.
22. Shenzhen Imp & Exp. Ltd.
23. T&S International, LLC.
24. Taiwan Wachine Co., Ltd.
25. Taizhou Overseas Int’l Ltd.
[FR Doc. E9–14358 Filed 6–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–891)
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Notice of Partial Rescission, Intent To
Rescind and Extension of Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Hand Trucks
and Certain Parts Thereof From the
People’s Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: In response to requests from
Gleason Industrial Products, Inc., and
Precision Products, Inc. (collectively,
petitioners), the U.S. Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on hand trucks
and certain parts thereof from the
People’s Republic of China for the
companies listed below for the period
December 1, 2007, through November
30, 2008. No other interested party
requested a review for this period of
review. For the reasons discussed
below, the Department is partially
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:25 Jun 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
rescinding this administrative review
with respect to two companies and
intends to rescind the review with
respect to a third company.
EFFECTIVE DATES: June 19, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0408 or (202) 482–
0649 respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2008, the Department
published in the Federal Register its
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on hand trucks
and certain parts thereof from the
People’s Republic of China. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 73 FR 72764
(December 1, 2008). On December 30,
2008, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b)(1), petitioners requested that
the Department conduct an
administrative review for the following
exporters of the subject merchandise:
Qingdao Huatian Hand Truck Co., Ltd.
(Huatian); True Potential Co., Ltd. (True
Potential); Since Hardware (Guangzhou)
Co., Ltd. (Since Hardware); and NewTec Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. (NewTec).
On February 2, 2009, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of the initiation of the
antidumping duty administrative review
of hand trucks from the PRC for the
period December 1, 2007, through
November 30, 2008, with respect to the
four companies named above. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 74 FR 5821 (February 2, 2009)
(Initiation Notice).
On February 19, 2009, the Department
issued a memorandum indicating its
intention to select mandatory
respondents based upon U.S. Customs
and Border Protection data for U.S.
imports of hand trucks from the PRC
during the POR. On February 13, 2009
petitioners provided comments to the
Department in which they requested
that the Department select Huatian and
True Potential as mandatory
respondents. On March 4, 2009, Huatian
and True Potential both provided the
Department with separate rate
certifications, thereby meeting the 30-
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
day deadline for submission of such
certifications as detailed in the
Initiation Notice. On March 16, 2009,
the Department determined that it was
not practicable to examine individually
all of the companies covered by the
2007–2008 administrative review. The
Department stated it was limiting its
examination to the largest producers/
exporters that could reasonably be
reviewed, pursuant to section
777A(c)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Tariff Act). The
Department selected Huatian and True
Potential as the two respondents
required to submit a full questionnaire
response in the administrative review.
See memorandum titled ‘‘Respondent
Selection Memorandum: Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Hand
Trucks and Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China’’ dated
March 16, 2009.
Huatian and True Potential filed their
section A responses on April 13, 2009
and their section C and D responses on
April 28, 2009. On May 1, 2009,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
petitioners withdrew their requests for
review of Huatian and True Potential
but did not withdraw the request with
respect to Since Hardware and New-Tec
On March 4, 2009, New-Tec provided
certification that New-Tec did not ship
to the United States any subject
merchandise during the POR and
requested the Department rescind the
review with respect to New-Tec. On
April 21, 2009, the Department’s no
shipments inquiry with respect to NewTec was posted by CBP. See message
number 9120201 dated April 21, 2009.
The Department has received no
information from that inquiry, and has
found no evidence of shipments of
subject merchandise to the United
States by New-Tec of subject
merchandise during the POR.
Rescission of Review
Section 351.213(d)(1) of the
Department’s regulations provide that
the Department will rescind an
administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its
request for review within 90 days of the
date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review, or
withdraws at a later date if the
Department determines that it is
reasonable to extend the time limit for
withdrawing the request. The
Department initiated the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on February 2, 2009. Petitioners
withdrew their request for review of
Huatian and True Potential on May 1,
2009. As the party that requested this
review has timely withdrawn the
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 117 / Friday, June 19, 2009 / Notices
requests for review, this review is
rescinded with respect to Huatian and
True Potential.
Intent To Rescind Review in Part
On March 4, 2009, New-Tec
submitted a certification of no
shipments of subject merchandise to the
United States. We have not received
comments on New-Tec’s submission.
We made inquires with CBP as to
whether any shipments were entered
with respect to New-Tec during the
POR. See message number 9120201
dated April 21, 2009. We received no
response to that inquiry. We examined
CBP information used in the selection of
the mandatory respondents to further
confirm no shipments by New-Tec
during the POR. See ‘‘Letter from Robert
James to All Interested Parties’’ dated
February 9, 2009, containing CBP data
on all entries of hand trucks and certain
parts thereof during the POR. Based on
the above, we preliminarily find that
New-Tec had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR, and we
intend to rescind the review with
respect to New-Tec pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3).
Interested parties may submit
comments on the Department’s intent to
rescind with respect to New-Tec no later
than 30 days after the date of
publication of this preliminary notice.
The Department will issue the final
notice, which will include the results of
its analysis of issues raised in any such
comments, in the preliminary results of
the review.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Since Hardware
Because the Department is rescinding
the review with respect to Huatian and
True-Potential, and because the
Department intends to rescind the
review with respect to New-Tec, the
Department has decided to make Since
Hardware the mandatory respondent in
this review. Since Hardware was issued
a complete questionnaire to respond to
on May 5, 2009. On May 26, 2009, Since
Hardware entered its notice of
appearance in this segment of the
proceeding. The Department will issue
appropriate assessment instructions
regarding the rescinded companies
directly to U.S. Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection.
Extension of Preliminary Results
The Department has determined that
it is not practicable to complete the
preliminary results by the current 245day deadline of September 2, 2009. The
Department selected Since Hardware as
a mandatory respondent on May 5,
2009, four days after petitioners
withdrew their request for a review of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:28 Jun 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
the two previously-selected mandatory
respondents Huatian and True Potential.
See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Re:
Selection of New Mandatory
Respondent,’’ dated May 5, 2009.
Because May 5, 2009 was more than
three months subsequent to the
initiation of this review, we will need
additional time to analyze Since
Hardware’s response and complete the
antidumping calculation. Therefore, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the
Department is extending the time limit
for the preliminary results by 120 days
to December 31, 2009.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
section 351.402(f) of the Department’s
regulations to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s assumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with section 351.305(a)(3) of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) of
the Department’s regulations.
Dated: June 12, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–14472 Filed 6–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29179
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XP86
Marine Mammals; File No.1032–1917
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; receipt of application for
amendment.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
Robert A. Garrott, Ph.D, Ecology
Department, Montana State University,
310 Lewis Hall, Bozeman, MT, 59717,
has applied for an amendment to
Scientific Research Permit No.1032–
1917.
DATES: Written, telefaxed, or e-mail
comments must be received on or before
July 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The application and related
documents are available for review by
selecting ‘‘Records Open for Public
Comment’’ from the Features box on the
Applications and Permits for Protected
Species (APPS) home page, https://
apps.nmfs.noaa.gov/, and then selecting
File No. 1032–1917–01 from the list of
available applications.
These documents are also available
upon written request or by appointment
in the following office(s):
Permits, Conservation and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone
(301) 713–2289; fax (301) 427–2521; and
Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213; phone (562) 980–4001;
fax (562) 980–4018.
Written comments or requests for a
public hearing on this request should be
submitted to the Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
F/PR1, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room
13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Those
individuals requesting a hearing should
set forth the specific reasons why a
hearing on this amendment request
would be appropriate.
Comments may also be submitted by
facsimile at (301) 427–2521, provided
the facsimile is confirmed by hard copy
submitted by mail and postmarked no
later than the closing date of the
comment period.
Comments may also be submitted by
e-mail. The mailbox address for
providing e-mail comments is
NMFS.Pr1Comments@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line of the e-mail
E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM
19JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29178-29179]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14472]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-570-891)
Notice of Partial Rescission, Intent To Rescind and Extension of
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Hand
Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: In response to requests from Gleason Industrial Products,
Inc., and Precision Products, Inc. (collectively, petitioners), the
U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on hand trucks and
certain parts thereof from the People's Republic of China for the
companies listed below for the period December 1, 2007, through
November 30, 2008. No other interested party requested a review for
this period of review. For the reasons discussed below, the Department
is partially rescinding this administrative review with respect to two
companies and intends to rescind the review with respect to a third
company.
EFFECTIVE DATES: June 19, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cordell or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0408
or (202) 482-0649 respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 2008, the Department published in the Federal
Register its notice of opportunity to request an administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on hand trucks and certain parts thereof
from the People's Republic of China. See Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 73 FR 72764 (December 1, 2008). On December 30,
2008, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), petitioners requested
that the Department conduct an administrative review for the following
exporters of the subject merchandise: Qingdao Huatian Hand Truck Co.,
Ltd. (Huatian); True Potential Co., Ltd. (True Potential); Since
Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. (Since Hardware); and New-Tec
Integration (Xiamen) Co., Ltd. (New-Tec).
On February 2, 2009, the Department published in the Federal
Register a notice of the initiation of the antidumping duty
administrative review of hand trucks from the PRC for the period
December 1, 2007, through November 30, 2008, with respect to the four
companies named above. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 74 FR
5821 (February 2, 2009) (Initiation Notice).
On February 19, 2009, the Department issued a memorandum indicating
its intention to select mandatory respondents based upon U.S. Customs
and Border Protection data for U.S. imports of hand trucks from the PRC
during the POR. On February 13, 2009 petitioners provided comments to
the Department in which they requested that the Department select
Huatian and True Potential as mandatory respondents. On March 4, 2009,
Huatian and True Potential both provided the Department with separate
rate certifications, thereby meeting the 30-day deadline for submission
of such certifications as detailed in the Initiation Notice. On March
16, 2009, the Department determined that it was not practicable to
examine individually all of the companies covered by the 2007-2008
administrative review. The Department stated it was limiting its
examination to the largest producers/exporters that could reasonably be
reviewed, pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Tariff Act). The Department selected Huatian and True
Potential as the two respondents required to submit a full
questionnaire response in the administrative review. See memorandum
titled ``Respondent Selection Memorandum: Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Hand Trucks and Parts Thereof from the
People's Republic of China'' dated March 16, 2009.
Huatian and True Potential filed their section A responses on April
13, 2009 and their section C and D responses on April 28, 2009. On May
1, 2009, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), petitioners withdrew their
requests for review of Huatian and True Potential but did not withdraw
the request with respect to Since Hardware and New-Tec
On March 4, 2009, New-Tec provided certification that New-Tec did
not ship to the United States any subject merchandise during the POR
and requested the Department rescind the review with respect to New-
Tec. On April 21, 2009, the Department's no shipments inquiry with
respect to New-Tec was posted by CBP. See message number 9120201 dated
April 21, 2009. The Department has received no information from that
inquiry, and has found no evidence of shipments of subject merchandise
to the United States by New-Tec of subject merchandise during the POR.
Rescission of Review
Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department's regulations provide that
the Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that
requested the review withdraws its request for review within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested
review, or withdraws at a later date if the Department determines that
it is reasonable to extend the time limit for withdrawing the request.
The Department initiated the administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on February 2, 2009. Petitioners withdrew their request for
review of Huatian and True Potential on May 1, 2009. As the party that
requested this review has timely withdrawn the
[[Page 29179]]
requests for review, this review is rescinded with respect to Huatian
and True Potential.
Intent To Rescind Review in Part
On March 4, 2009, New-Tec submitted a certification of no shipments
of subject merchandise to the United States. We have not received
comments on New-Tec's submission. We made inquires with CBP as to
whether any shipments were entered with respect to New-Tec during the
POR. See message number 9120201 dated April 21, 2009. We received no
response to that inquiry. We examined CBP information used in the
selection of the mandatory respondents to further confirm no shipments
by New-Tec during the POR. See ``Letter from Robert James to All
Interested Parties'' dated February 9, 2009, containing CBP data on all
entries of hand trucks and certain parts thereof during the POR. Based
on the above, we preliminarily find that New-Tec had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR, and we intend to rescind the review
with respect to New-Tec pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3).
Interested parties may submit comments on the Department's intent
to rescind with respect to New-Tec no later than 30 days after the date
of publication of this preliminary notice. The Department will issue
the final notice, which will include the results of its analysis of
issues raised in any such comments, in the preliminary results of the
review.
Since Hardware
Because the Department is rescinding the review with respect to
Huatian and True-Potential, and because the Department intends to
rescind the review with respect to New-Tec, the Department has decided
to make Since Hardware the mandatory respondent in this review. Since
Hardware was issued a complete questionnaire to respond to on May 5,
2009. On May 26, 2009, Since Hardware entered its notice of appearance
in this segment of the proceeding. The Department will issue
appropriate assessment instructions regarding the rescinded companies
directly to U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection.
Extension of Preliminary Results
The Department has determined that it is not practicable to
complete the preliminary results by the current 245-day deadline of
September 2, 2009. The Department selected Since Hardware as a
mandatory respondent on May 5, 2009, four days after petitioners
withdrew their request for a review of the two previously-selected
mandatory respondents Huatian and True Potential. See Memorandum to the
File, ``Re: Selection of New Mandatory Respondent,'' dated May 5, 2009.
Because May 5, 2009 was more than three months subsequent to the
initiation of this review, we will need additional time to analyze
Since Hardware's response and complete the antidumping calculation.
Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department is extending the time limit for the
preliminary results by 120 days to December 31, 2009.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under section 351.402(f) of the Department's regulations
to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's
assumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and
subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding APOs
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with section 351.305(a)(3) of the Department's
regulations. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4) of the
Department's regulations.
Dated: June 12, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-14472 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S