Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, In Part, 28664-28665 [E9-14243]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
28664
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 11, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–14183 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Export License
Services—Transfer of License
Ownership, Request for a Duplicate
License
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and
Security.
ACTION: Notice.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 17, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 7845,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Larry Hall, BIS ICB Liaison,
(202) 482–4895, lhall@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This collection is needed to provide
services to exporters who have either
lost their original license and require a
duplicate, or who wish to transfer their
ownership of an approved license to
another party.
II. Method of Collection
Submitted in paper form.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:33 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0694–0126.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
200.
Estimated Time per Response: 16 to
66 minutes per response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 38 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 11, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–14184 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–816]
Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products from the Republic
of Korea: Notice of Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, In Part
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 30, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the notice of
initiation of this antidumping duty
administrative review with respect to
seven companies, including Dongkuk
Industries Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk). Dongkuk
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submitted a letter to the Department
stating that it had no shipments of
subject merchandise to the U.S. during
the period of review (POR), which was
corroborated by the Department. On
April 14, 2009, we published the notice
of preliminary rescission of this
antidumping duty administrative review
with respect to Dongkuk, and invited
interested parties to comment. See
Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products from the Republic of
Korea: Notice of Intent to Rescind
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, In Part, 74 FR 17159 (April 14,
2009) (Preliminary Rescision). We
received no comments, and have
determined that the review of Dongkuk
should be rescinded. This review will
remain in effect for all other companies
initiated upon.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Hargett, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4161.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 30, 2008, we published
the Notice of Initiation of this
antidumping duty administrative review
with respect to Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd.,
Dongkuk, Haewon MSC Co., Ltd.,
Hyundai HYSCO, LG Chem, Ltd.,
Pohang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd./Pohang
Coated Steel Co., Ltd., and Union Steel
Manufacturing Co., Ltd., for the period
August 1, 2007, through July 31, 2008.
See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 73 FR 56795 (September 30, 2008)
(Notice of Initiation). On October 20,
2008, Dongkuk submitted a letter
certifying that it had no sales of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR. See Letter from Dongkuk to the
Secretary of Commerce, dated October
20, 2008. The Department used entry
data placed on the record of the instant
review for selection of respondents to
corroborate Dongkuk’s claim. See
memorandum from Joy Zhang,
International Trade Compliance
Analyst, through James Terpstra,
Program Manager, Office 3 AD/CVD
Operations, and Melissa Skinner, Office
Director, Office 3, AD/CVD Operations,
to the File, dated October 2, 2008 (CBP
Data). On December 9, 2008, the
Department requested the U.S. entry
documents from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection for clarification of
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
several entries. See memorandum from
Melissa Skinner, Office Director, Office
3, AD/CVD Operations, to David M.
Genovese, Director, AD/CVD/Revenue
Policy & Programs, Office of
International Trade, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, dated December 9,
2008 (Entry Documentation Request).
On January 26, 2009, the Department
received the requested entry
documentation. See memorandum from
Tom Futtner, Customs Unit, to Melissa
Skinner, dated January 2, 2009 (Entry
Documentation). On March 27, 2009,
the Department determined that
Dongkuk’s claim of no shipments was
corroborated using the entry
documentation. See memorandum from
Christopher Hargett, International Trade
Compliance Analyst, Office 3, through
James Terpstra, Program Manager,
Office 3, to Melissa Skinner, Office
Director, Office 3, Import
Administration, dated March 27, 2009.
On April 14, we published the
Preliminary Rescission with respect to
Dongkuk, and invited interested parties
to comment. See Preliminary Rescission,
at 17160. A complete description of the
order on corrosion–resistant carbon
steel flat products from Korea is
contained in the Preliminary Rescission.
We received no comments.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the
Department may rescind an
administrative review, with respect to a
particular exporter or producer, if the
Secretary concludes that, during the
period covered by the review, there
were no entries, exports, or sales of the
subject merchandise by that producer.
Dongkuk submitted a letter on October
20, 2008, certifying that it did not have
sales of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR. The
petitioners, United States Steel
Corporation, Nucor Corporation, and
Mittal Steel USA ISG, Inc., did not
comment on Dongkuk’s no–shipment
claim.
As noted, we conducted an internal
customs data query on October 2, 2008,
as part of the selection of respondents
for individual review. See CBP Data.
The data query showed several
questionable entries, of which the
Department requested entry documents.
See Entry Documentation Request. The
documentation showed that the
questionable entries from the CBP data
were not produced by Dongkuk. See
Entry Documentation.
Based on our analysis of the shipment
data, Dongkuk is a non–shipper for this
review. See No Shipment Analysis.
Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:29 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
practice, we are rescinding this review
with respect to Dongkuk. See, e.g.,
Stainless Steel Bar From India; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and New
Shipper Review and Partial Rescission
of Administrative Review, 65 FR 48965,
48966 (August 10, 2000).
28665
Background
for the period of review (POR) February
1, 2008, through January 31, 2009. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review, 74 FR 6013
(February 4, 2009). The Department
received a timely request from the Ad
Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee
(Domestic Producers) in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil.
On April 7, 2009, the Department
published a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil
with respect to 43 companies. See
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from
Brazil, India and Thailand: Notice of
Initiation of Administrative Reviews, 74
FR 15699 (April 7, 2009) (Initiation
Notice).
The Department stated in its initiation
of this review that it intended to rely on
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) data to select respondents. See
Initiation Notice. However, our review
of the CBP database showed no entries
of certain frozen warmwater shrimp
originating in Brazil, subject to AD/CVD
duties, during the period February 1,
2008, to January 31, 2009. See April 9,
2009, Memorandum to the File from
Kate Johnson entitled ‘‘Release of POR
Entry Data from CBP.’’ We released the
results of our CBP data query to
interested parties and invited them to
comment on the CBP data and
respondent selection. On May 1, 2009,
the Domestic Producers submitted
comments, which we addressed in the
June 10, 2009, Memorandum to James
Maeder, Director, Office 2, AD/CVD
Operations from Kate Johnson and
Rebecca Trainor, Senior Case Analysts,
Office 2, AD/CVD Operations, entitled
‘‘Intent to Rescind Administrative
Review.’’
On May 8, 2009, we sent a ‘‘No
Shipments Inquiry’’ to CBP to confirm
that there were no shipments or entries
of frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil
during the POR. We received no
information from CBP to contradict the
results of our data query that there were
no shipments or entries of subject
merchandise to the United States during
the POR.
On February 4, 2009, the Department
of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register a
notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request
Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from Brazil
Rescission of Review
Section 351.213(d)(3) of the
Department’s regulations stipulates that
the Secretary may rescind an
administrative review if there were no
entries, exports, or sales of the subject
merchandise during the POR. As there
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also is the only reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation. We are issuing
and publishing these results and notice
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)
and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: June 11, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–14243 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–838]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from Brazil: Notice of Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 2009
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Johnson or Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4929 or (202) 482–
4007, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28664-28665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14243]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-816]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from the
Republic of Korea: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, In Part
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 30, 2008, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the notice of initiation of this antidumping duty
administrative review with respect to seven companies, including
Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk). Dongkuk submitted a letter to
the Department stating that it had no shipments of subject merchandise
to the U.S. during the period of review (POR), which was corroborated
by the Department. On April 14, 2009, we published the notice of
preliminary rescission of this antidumping duty administrative review
with respect to Dongkuk, and invited interested parties to comment. See
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from the
Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, In Part, 74 FR 17159 (April 14, 2009)
(Preliminary Rescision). We received no comments, and have determined
that the review of Dongkuk should be rescinded. This review will remain
in effect for all other companies initiated upon.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Hargett, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4161.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 30, 2008, we published the Notice of Initiation of
this antidumping duty administrative review with respect to Dongbu
Steel Co., Ltd., Dongkuk, Haewon MSC Co., Ltd., Hyundai HYSCO, LG Chem,
Ltd., Pohang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd./Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd.,
and Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd., for the period August 1, 2007,
through July 31, 2008. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 73 FR
56795 (September 30, 2008) (Notice of Initiation). On October 20, 2008,
Dongkuk submitted a letter certifying that it had no sales of subject
merchandise to the United States during the POR. See Letter from
Dongkuk to the Secretary of Commerce, dated October 20, 2008. The
Department used entry data placed on the record of the instant review
for selection of respondents to corroborate Dongkuk's claim. See
memorandum from Joy Zhang, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
through James Terpstra, Program Manager, Office 3 AD/CVD Operations,
and Melissa Skinner, Office Director, Office 3, AD/CVD Operations, to
the File, dated October 2, 2008 (CBP Data). On December 9, 2008, the
Department requested the U.S. entry documents from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection for clarification of
[[Page 28665]]
several entries. See memorandum from Melissa Skinner, Office Director,
Office 3, AD/CVD Operations, to David M. Genovese, Director, AD/CVD/
Revenue Policy & Programs, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, dated December 9, 2008 (Entry Documentation
Request). On January 26, 2009, the Department received the requested
entry documentation. See memorandum from Tom Futtner, Customs Unit, to
Melissa Skinner, dated January 2, 2009 (Entry Documentation). On March
27, 2009, the Department determined that Dongkuk's claim of no
shipments was corroborated using the entry documentation. See
memorandum from Christopher Hargett, International Trade Compliance
Analyst, Office 3, through James Terpstra, Program Manager, Office 3,
to Melissa Skinner, Office Director, Office 3, Import Administration,
dated March 27, 2009. On April 14, we published the Preliminary
Rescission with respect to Dongkuk, and invited interested parties to
comment. See Preliminary Rescission, at 17160. A complete description
of the order on corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products from
Korea is contained in the Preliminary Rescission. We received no
comments.
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department may rescind an
administrative review, with respect to a particular exporter or
producer, if the Secretary concludes that, during the period covered by
the review, there were no entries, exports, or sales of the subject
merchandise by that producer. Dongkuk submitted a letter on October 20,
2008, certifying that it did not have sales of subject merchandise to
the United States during the POR. The petitioners, United States Steel
Corporation, Nucor Corporation, and Mittal Steel USA ISG, Inc., did not
comment on Dongkuk's no-shipment claim.
As noted, we conducted an internal customs data query on October 2,
2008, as part of the selection of respondents for individual review.
See CBP Data. The data query showed several questionable entries, of
which the Department requested entry documents. See Entry Documentation
Request. The documentation showed that the questionable entries from
the CBP data were not produced by Dongkuk. See Entry Documentation.
Based on our analysis of the shipment data, Dongkuk is a non-
shipper for this review. See No Shipment Analysis. Therefore, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), and consistent with our practice,
we are rescinding this review with respect to Dongkuk. See, e.g.,
Stainless Steel Bar From India; Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and New Shipper Review and Partial Rescission of
Administrative Review, 65 FR 48965, 48966 (August 10, 2000).
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also is the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: June 11, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-14243 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
