Quarterly Update to Annual Listing of Foreign Government Subsidies on Articles of Cheese Subject to an In-Quota Rate of Duty, 28671-28672 [E9-14241]
Download as PDF
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices
contained in CM 25–03, and the
mandatory use of marine mammal
exclusion devices on trawls; (b) at least
one observer appointed in accordance
with the CCAMLR Scheme of
International Scientific Observation,
and, where possible, one additional
observer on board throughout all fishing
activities within the season; (c) use of
the 10-day catch and effort reporting
system; (d) collection of haul-by-haul
catch, effort and biological data; and (e)
application of general environmental
protection measures in CM 26–01 and
no offal discharge.
19. The Commission adopted new
fishery regulation CM 52–01 (2008)—
Crab: Limits on the fishery for crab in
Statistical Subarea 48.3 in the 2008/09
season.
The Commission agreed to combine
the requirements of CM 52–01 (2007)
and 52–02 (2007) into a single measure
for the crab fishery in Statistical Subarea
48.3. The elements of these measures
were carried forward to 2008/09. The
Commission also agreed to a
requirement to carry at least one
observer appointed in accordance with
the CCAMLR Scheme of International
Scientific Observation on board each
vessel during all fishing activities.
20. The Commission adopted new
fishery regulation CM 52–02 (2008)—
Crab: Limits on the exploratory fishery
for crab in Statistical Subarea 48.2 in the
2008/09 season.
The Commission agreed that the
notifications for new fisheries for crab
in 2008/09 should be considered as
exploratory fisheries.
The Commission agreed that the
exploratory fishery for crab in Statistical
Subarea 48.2 in 2008/09 would be
limited to one Russian-flagged vessel
using pots only. The precautionary
catch limit for crab was set at 250 tons.
In accordance with CM 32–03
(Prohibition of directed fishing for
finfish in Statistical Subarea 48.2), the
Commission required that all live finfish
taken as by-catch in the exploratory
fishery for crab be released with the
least possible handling, and that all live
Dissostichus spp. be tagged prior to
release. A total by-catch limit of 0.5 tons
was set for all dead finfish. Other
requirements in this fishery included,
among other things, scientific
observations, a data collection plan and
an experimental harvest regime.
21. The Commission adopted new
fishery regulation CM 52–03 (2008)—
Crab: Limits on the exploratory fishery
for crab in Statistical Subarea 48.4 in the
2008/09 season.
The Commission agreed that the
exploratory fishery for crab in Statistical
Subarea 48.4 in 2008/09 would be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:33 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
limited to one Russian-flagged vessel
using pots only. The precautionary
catch limits for crab was set at 10 tons.
The Commission agreed that all live
finfish taken as by-catch be released
with the least possible handling, and
that all live Dissostichus spp. be tagged
prior to release. A total by-catch limit of
0.5 tons was set for all dead finfish.
Other requirements in this fishery
included, among other things, scientific
observations, a data collection plan and
an experimental harvest regime.
22. The Commission adopted new
fishery regulation CM 61–01 (2008)—
Squid: Limits on the exploratory fishery
for Martialia hyadesi in Statistical
Subarea 48.3 in the 2008/09 season.
The Commission carried forward the
limits for the exploratory jig fishery for
Martialia hyadesi in Statistical Subarea
48.3 in 2008/09, noting that no
notification had been submitted for this
fishery in 2008/09.
——————
1 Except for waters adjacent to the
Kerguelen Islands and Crozet Islands
2 Except for waters adjacent to the Prince
Edward Islands.
New Resolutions
The Commission adopted Resolution
27/XXVII (Use of a specific tariff
classification for Antarctic krill) urging
Members to adopt and use a specific
tariff code for any trade in krill in order
to improve Members’ knowledge of the
trade of krill products.
The Commission adopted Resolution
28/XXVII (Ballast water exchange in the
Convention Area). The Antarctic Treaty
Parties had adopted Resolution 3 (2006)
Ballast Water Exchange in the Antarctic
Treaty Area, which set out Practical
Guidelines for Ballast Water Exchange
in the Antarctic Treaty Area. The aim of
the guidelines was to support early
implementation of the practical
measures identified in the International
Convention for the Control and
Management of Ships’ Ballast Waters
and Sediments, 2004 (IMO Ballast Water
Management Convention). The
guidelines were subsequently forwarded
to the Marine Environment Protection
Committee of the International Maritime
Organization (IMO), which also adopted
them in Resolution MEPC.164 (56).
The Commission noted that all
CCAMLR Members have endorsed the
guidelines for use in the Antarctic
Treaty Area, through the IMO
Resolution. It agreed to implement the
guidelines for application to vessels
engaged in harvesting and associated
activities, as set out in Article II.3 of the
CCAMLR Convention. In addition,
although in practical terms any vessel
transiting the Convention Area on route
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28671
to the Antarctic Treaty Area should
already be using the guidelines, the
guidelines were extended to vessels
operating only in the Convention Area
north of 60 degrees S. Accordingly, the
Commission adopted Resolution 28/
XXVII.
For further information, see the
CCAMLR Web site at www.ccamlr.org
under Publications for the Schedule of
Conservation Measures in Force (2008/
2009), or contact the Commission at the
CCAMLR Secretariat, P.O. Box 213,
North Hobart, Tasmania 7002, Australia.
Tel: (61) 3–6210–1111).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.
Dated: June 11, 2009.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9–14266 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Quarterly Update to Annual Listing of
Foreign Government Subsidies on
Articles of Cheese Subject to an InQuota Rate of Duty
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gayle Longest, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202)
482–3338.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
702 of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (as amended) (‘‘the Act’’) requires
the Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) to determine, in
consultation with the Secretary of
Agriculture, whether any foreign
government is providing a subsidy with
respect to any article of cheese subject
to an in-quota rate of duty, as defined
in section 702(h) of the Act, and to
publish an annual list and quarterly
updates to the type and amount of those
subsidies. We hereby provide the
Department’s quarterly update of
subsidies on articles of cheese that were
imported during the period January 1,
2009, through March 31, 2009.
The Department has developed, in
consultation with the Secretary of
Agriculture, information on subsidies
(as defined in section 702(h) of the Act)
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
28672
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices
being provided either directly or
indirectly by foreign governments on
articles of cheese subject to an in-quota
rate of duty. The appendix to this notice
lists the country, the subsidy program or
programs, and the gross and net
amounts of each subsidy for which
information is currently available. The
Department will incorporate additional
programs which are found to constitute
subsidies, and additional information
on the subsidy programs listed, as the
information is developed.
The Department encourages any
person having information on foreign
government subsidy programs which
benefit articles of cheese subject to an
in-quota rate of duty to submit such
information in writing to the Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
This determination and notice are in
accordance with section 702(a) of the
Act.
Dated: June 11, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
SUBSIDY PROGRAMS ON CHEESE SUBJECT TO AN IN-QUOTA RATE OF DUTY
Country
27
European
States 3.
Union
Gross 1 subsidy ($/lb)
Program(s)
Net 2 subsidy
($/lb)
Member
European Union Restitution Payments .....................................................
$0.00
$0.00
Canada ............................................
Export Assistance on Certain Types of Cheese .......................................
0.31
0.31
Norway .............................................
Indirect (Milk) Subsidy ...............................................................................
Consumer Subsidy ....................................................................................
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total ...........................................................................................................
0.00
0.00
Deficiency Payments .................................................................................
0.00
0.00
Switzerland ......................................
1 Defined
in 19 U.S.C. 1677(5).
2 Defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(6).
3 The 27 member states of the European Union are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia,
Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
[FR Doc. E9–14241 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
United States Air Force
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
Modification of the Condor 1 and
Condor 2 Military Operations Areas
Used by the 104th Fighter Wing of the
Massachusetts Air National Guard
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Air National Guard,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of intent (NOI) to prepare
an environmental impact statement.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 United
States Code [U.S.C.] 4321–4347), the
Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) NEPA Regulations (40 Code of
Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500–
1508), and the United States Air Force’s
(USAF) Environmental Impact Analysis
Process (EIAP, 32 CFR part 989), the Air
Force is issuing this notice to advise the
public and other Federal agencies that
the ANG intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for proposed modifications of the
Condor 1 and Condor 2 Military
Operations Areas (MOAs) used by the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:33 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
104th Fighter Wing (FW) of the
Massachusetts ANG (MAANG). The
104th FW is based at Barnes ANG Base
in Westfield, Massachusetts. The study
area for this EIS includes portions of
Piscataquis, Somerset, Franklin, and
Oxford counties in Maine and a portion
of Coos County, New Hampshire.
The ANG and Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) completed an
Environmental Assessment (EA) of this
proposal in June 2008. However, in
response to requests from elected
officials and the general public, the
ANG has elected to prepare an EIS. The
ANG conducted five previous scoping
meetings in the towns of Rumford,
Mexico, Rangeley, and Farmington (2),
Maine as part of the EA process; the
previous scoping meetings are sufficient
and follow-on scoping meetings are not
deemed necessary. However, the Air
Force requests formal written scoping
comments from the public, state and
local government agencies, as well as
affected Federal agencies for 30 days
after the publication date of this NOI, to
ascertain if there are additional issues
relevant to the range of actions,
alternatives, and impacts to be
examined in detail in the draft EIS.
The Condor 1 and 2 MOAs are
centered approximately 200 nautical
miles northeast of Barnes ANG Base.
The altitudes of both MOAs currently
extend from 7,000 feet above mean sea
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
level (MSL) (between approximately
2,800 feet and 6,300 feet above ground
level [AGL]) up to 18,000 ft MSL.
Condor 1 MOA is located immediately
west of Condor 2 MOA. The Condor 1
and 2 MOAs are currently utilized by
aircraft from the MAANG, the Vermont
ANG, the United States Air Force, and
the United States Navy. Units from
these services utilize a variety of aircraft
including the F–15, F–16, KC–10, KC–
135, and P–3. Of these aircraft, F–15 and
F–16 operations currently constitute 86–
88% of annual operations in the Condor
1 and 2 MOAs.
The Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) is
the United States Air Force’s
continuation training program designed
to focus training or develop capabilities
needed to accomplish a unit’s core
missions. The RAP requirements for
every qualified F–15 and F–16 pilot
include Low Altitude Awareness
Training (LOWAT) which includes
realistic, mission oriented air-to-air
operations while in a LOWAT-certified
low-altitude block at or below 1,000 feet
AGL, as well as Low Slow/Visual
Identification intercept and Slow
Shadow intercept training missions.
These training missions require pilots to
identify and engage aerial targets at low
altitude, and perform low altitude
navigation, tactical formation, and
defensive maneuvering to avoid or
negate threats.
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28671-28672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14241]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Quarterly Update to Annual Listing of Foreign Government
Subsidies on Articles of Cheese Subject to an In-Quota Rate of Duty
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gayle Longest, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-3338.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 702 of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (as amended) (``the Act'') requires the Department of Commerce
(``the Department'') to determine, in consultation with the Secretary
of Agriculture, whether any foreign government is providing a subsidy
with respect to any article of cheese subject to an in-quota rate of
duty, as defined in section 702(h) of the Act, and to publish an annual
list and quarterly updates to the type and amount of those subsidies.
We hereby provide the Department's quarterly update of subsidies on
articles of cheese that were imported during the period January 1,
2009, through March 31, 2009.
The Department has developed, in consultation with the Secretary of
Agriculture, information on subsidies (as defined in section 702(h) of
the Act)
[[Page 28672]]
being provided either directly or indirectly by foreign governments on
articles of cheese subject to an in-quota rate of duty. The appendix to
this notice lists the country, the subsidy program or programs, and the
gross and net amounts of each subsidy for which information is
currently available. The Department will incorporate additional
programs which are found to constitute subsidies, and additional
information on the subsidy programs listed, as the information is
developed.
The Department encourages any person having information on foreign
government subsidy programs which benefit articles of cheese subject to
an in-quota rate of duty to submit such information in writing to the
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230.
This determination and notice are in accordance with section 702(a)
of the Act.
Dated: June 11, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
Subsidy Programs on Cheese Subject to an In-Quota Rate of Duty
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross \1\ Net \2\
Country Program(s) subsidy ($/lb) subsidy ($/lb)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
27 European Union Member States \3\........ European Union Restitution Payments $0.00 $0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canada..................................... Export Assistance on Certain Types 0.31 0.31
of Cheese.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norway..................................... Indirect (Milk) Subsidy............ 0.00 0.00
Consumer Subsidy................... 0.00 0.00
-------------------------------
Total.............................. 0.00 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Switzerland................................ Deficiency Payments................ 0.00 0.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(5).
\2\ Defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(6).
\3\ The 27 member states of the European Union are: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark,
Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,
Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
[FR Doc. E9-14241 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P