RBC Capital Markets Corporation, et al.; Notice of Application and Temporary Order, 28290-28291 [E9-13980]
Download as PDF
28290
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Notices
exemptions granted under the Act in
connection with the application.
Temporary Order
The Commission has considered the
matter and finds that Applicants have
made the necessary showing to justify
granting a temporary exemption.
Accordingly,
It is hereby ordered, pursuant to
section 9(c) of the Act, that Applicants
and any other Covered Persons are
granted a temporary exemption from the
provisions of section 9(a), solely with
respect to the Injunction, subject to the
condition in the application, from June
9, 2009, until the Commission takes
final action on their application for a
permanent order.
By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–13981 Filed 6–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–28762; File No. 812–13663]
RBC Capital Markets Corporation, et
al.; Notice of Application and
Temporary Order
June 9, 2009.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Temporary order and notice of
application for a permanent order under
section 9(c) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
have received a temporary order
exempting them from section 9(a) of the
Act, with respect to an injunction
entered against RBC Capital Markets
Corporation (‘‘RBC’’) on June 9, 2009 by
the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York
(‘‘Injunction’’), until the Commission
takes final action on an application for
a permanent order. Applicants also have
applied for a permanent order.
APPLICANTS: RBC, Voyageur Asset
Management Inc. (‘‘Voyageur’’),
Tamarack Distributors Inc.
(‘‘Tamarack’’), and Sky Investment
Counsel Inc. (‘‘Sky’’) (collectively, other
than RBC, the ‘‘Fund Servicing
Applicants’’ and together with RBC, the
‘‘Applicants’’).1
1 Applicants request that any relief granted
pursuant to the application also apply to any other
company of which RBC is or may become an
affiliated person (together with the Applicants, the
‘‘Covered Persons’’).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Jun 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
FILING DATE: The application was filed
on June 3, 2009. Applicants have agreed
to file an amendment during the notice
period, the substance of which is
reflected in this notice.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on July 6, 2009, and should
be accompanied by proof of service on
Applicants, in the form of an affidavit,
or for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Hearing requests should state the nature
of the writer’s interest, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
1090; Applicants: RBC, One Liberty
Plaza, 165 Broadway, New York, NY
10006; Voyageur and Tamarack, 100
South Fifth Street, Suite 2300,
Minneapolis, MN 55402; and Sky, 1
Adelaide Street East, Suite 2310,
Toronto, ON, Canada M5C 2V9.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaea
F. Hahn, Senior Counsel, at (202) 551–
6870, or Julia Kim Gilmer, Branch Chief,
at (202) 551–6821, (Division of
Investment Management, Office of
Investment Company Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a temporary order and a
summary of the application. The
complete application may be obtained
via the Commission’s Web site by
searching for the file number, or an
applicant using the Company name box,
at https://www.sec.gov/search/
search.htm or by calling (202) 551–
8090.
Applicants’ Representations
1. RBC is a full service investment
banking firm engaged in securities
underwriting, sales and trading,
investment banking, financial advisory
services and investment research
services. RBC is registered with the
Commission as a broker-dealer under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (‘‘Exchange Act’’) and as an
investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended (‘‘Advisers Act’’). RBC is an
indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of
Royal Bank of Canada (‘‘Royal Bank’’),
a Canada-based global financial services
firm.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Voyaguer and Sky are registered as
investment advisers under the Advisers
Act and provide investment advisory or
subadvisory services to registered
investment companies (‘‘Funds’’).
Voyageur is an indirect, wholly owned
subsidiary of Royal Bank. Royal Bank
indirectly owns a controlling interest in
Sky. Tamarack is a broker-dealer
registered under the Exchange Act and
serves as principal underwriter to openend Funds. None of the Applicants
serve as depositor to any Fund.
3. On June 9, 2009, the United States
District Court for the Southern District
of New York entered a judgment against
RBC (‘‘Judgment’’) in a matter brought
by the Commission.2 The Commission
alleged in the complaint (‘‘Complaint’’)
that RBC violated section 15(c) of the
Exchange Act by misrepresenting to
many of its customers that auction rate
securities were safe, highly liquid
investments that were substitutes for
cash or money market funds. The
Complaint further alleges that on
February 11, 2008, RBC determined not
to place bids in most of its auctions, as
it had historically done, resulting in
failed auctions. Without admitting or
denying the allegations in the
Complaint, except as to jurisdiction,
RBC consented to the entry of the
Injunction and other equitable relief
including undertakings to take various
remedial actions for the benefit of
purchasers of certain auction rate
securities.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 9(a)(2) of the Act, in
relevant part, prohibits a person who
has been enjoined from, among other
things, engaging in or continuing any
conduct or practice in connection with
the purchase or sale of a security, or in
connection with activities as an
underwriter, broker or dealer, from
acting, among other things, as an
investment adviser or depositor of any
registered investment company or a
principal underwriter for any registered
open-end investment company,
registered unit investment trust or
registered face-amount certificate
company. Section 9(a)(3) of the Act
makes the prohibition in section 9(a)(2)
applicable to a company, any affiliated
person of which has been disqualified
under the provisions of section 9(a)(2).
Section 2(a)(3) of the Act defines
‘‘affiliated person’’ to include, among
others, any person directly or indirectly
controlling, controlled by, or under
2 Securities and Exchange Commission v. RBC
Capital Markets Corporation, Judgment as to
Defendant RBC Capital Markets Corporation, 09–
cv–5172 (S.D.N.Y., June 9, 2009).
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Notices
common control with, the other person.
Applicants state that RBC is an affiliated
person of each of the other Applicants
within the meaning of section 2(a)(3) of
the Act. Applicants state that the entry
of the Injunction results in Applicants
being subject to the disqualification
provisions of section 9(a) of the Act.
2. Section 9(c) of the Act provides that
the Commission shall grant an
application for exemption from the
disqualification provisions of section
9(a) if it is established that these
provisions, as applied to the Applicants,
are unduly or disproportionately severe
or that the Applicants’ conduct has been
such as not to make it against the public
interest or the protection of investors to
grant the exemption. Applicants have
filed an application pursuant to section
9(c) seeking a temporary and permanent
order exempting them and Covered
Persons from the disqualification
provisions of section 9(a) of the Act.
3. Applicants believe they meet the
standards for exemption specified in
section 9(c). Applicants state that the
prohibitions of section 9(a) as applied to
them would be unduly and
disproportionately severe and that the
conduct of the Applicants has been such
as not to make it against the public
interest or the protection of investors to
grant the exemption from section 9(a).
4. Applicants state that the alleged
conduct giving rise to the Injunction did
not involve any of the Applicants acting
in the capacity of investment adviser or
subadviser to any Fund or in the
capacity of principal underwriter for
any open-end Fund. Applicants also
state that none of the current or former
directors, officers, or employees of the
Fund Servicing Applicants had any
knowledge of, or had any involvement
in, the conduct alleged in the
Complaint. Applicants further state that
the personnel at RBC who were
involved in the violations alleged in the
Complaint have had no involvement in
providing investment advisory,
subadvisory or principal underwriting
services to Funds and will not have any
future involvement in such activities.
5. Applicants state that the inability to
continue to provide investment advisory
and subadvisory services to Funds and
principal underwriting services to openend Funds would result in potential
hardship for the Funds and their
shareholders. Applicants state that they
will, as soon as reasonably practical,
distribute written materials, including
an offer to meet in person to discuss the
materials, to the boards of directors of
the Funds (‘‘Boards’’) for which the
Applicants serve as investment adviser,
investment subadviser or principal
underwriter, including the directors
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Jun 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
who are not ‘‘interested persons,’’ as
defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act, of
such Funds, and their independent legal
counsel as defined in rule 0–1(a)(6)
under the Act, relating to the
circumstances that led to the Injunction,
any impact on the Funds, and the
application. Applicants state they will
provide the Boards with all information
concerning the Injunction and the
application that is necessary for the
Funds to fulfill their disclosure and
other obligations under the federal
securities laws.
6. Applicants also state that, if they
were barred from providing services to
Funds, the effect on their businesses
and employees would be severe.
Applicants state that they have
committed substantial resources to
establish an expertise in providing
advisory and distribution services to
Funds. Applicants further state that
prohibiting them from providing such
services would not only adversely affect
their businesses, but would also
adversely affect approximately 35
employees who are involved in those
activities.
7. Applicants have not previously
received an exemption under section
9(c) as the result of conduct that
triggered section 9(a).
Applicants’ Condition
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following condition:
Any temporary exemption granted
pursuant to the application shall be
without prejudice to, and shall not limit
the Commission’s rights in any manner
with respect to, any Commission
investigation of, or administrative
proceedings involving or against,
Covered Persons, including, without
limitation, the consideration by the
Commission of a permanent exemption
from section 9(a) of the Act requested
pursuant to the application or the
revocation or removal of any temporary
exemptions granted under the Act in
connection with the application.
Temporary Order
The Commission has considered the
matter and finds that Applicants have
made the necessary showing to justify
granting a temporary exemption.
Accordingly,
It is hereby ordered, pursuant to
section 9(c) of the Act, that Applicants
and any other Covered Persons are
granted a temporary exemption from the
provisions of section 9(a), solely with
respect to the Injunction, subject to the
condition in the application, from June
9, 2009, until the Commission takes
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28291
final action on their application for a
permanent order.
By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–13980 Filed 6–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–28764; File No. 812–13662]
Banc of America Securities LLC, et al.;
Notice of Application and Temporary
Order
June 9, 2009.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Temporary order and notice of
application for a permanent order under
section 9(c) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’).
SUMMARY: Summary of Application:
Applicants have received a temporary
order exempting them from section 9(a)
of the Act, with respect to an injunction
entered against Banc of America
Securities LLC (‘‘BAS’’) and Banc of
America Investment Services, Inc.
(‘‘BAI’’) on June 9, 2009 by the United
States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (‘‘Injunction’’)
until the Commission takes final action
on an application for a permanent order.
Applicants also have applied for a
permanent order.
APPLICANTS: BAS, BAI, Columbia
Management Advisors, LLC (‘‘CMA’’),
Columbia Wanger Asset Management,
LP (‘‘CWAM’’), Columbia Management
Distributors, Inc. (‘‘CMDI’’), Banc of
America Investment Advisors, Inc.
(‘‘BAIA’’), Bank of America Capital
Advisors LLC (‘‘BACA’’), U.S. Trust
Hedge Fund Management, Inc.
(‘‘USTHFM’’), Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith, Incorporated
(‘‘MLPFS’’), IQ Investment Advisors
LLC (‘‘IQ’’), Roszel Advisors, LLC
(‘‘Roszel’’), Nuveen Asset Management
(‘‘NAM’’), Nuveen Investments Advisers
Inc. (‘‘NIA’’), Nuveen Investments
Institutional Services Group, LLC
(‘‘ISG’’), Nuveen HydePark Group, LLC
(‘‘Nuveen HydePark’’), NWQ Investment
Management Company LLC (‘‘NWQ’’),
Nuveen Investment Solutions, Inc.
(‘‘NIS’’), Santa Barbara Asset
Management, LLC (‘‘Santa Barbara’’),
Symphony Asset Management LLC
(‘‘Symphony’’), Tradewinds Global
Investors, LLC (‘‘Tradewinds’’) and
Winslow Capital Management, Inc.
(‘‘Winslow’’, together with NAM, NIA,
ISG, Nuveen HydePark, NWQ, NIS,
E:\FR\FM\15JNN1.SGM
15JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 113 (Monday, June 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28290-28291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13980]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. IC-28762; File No. 812-13663]
RBC Capital Markets Corporation, et al.; Notice of Application
and Temporary Order
June 9, 2009.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Temporary order and notice of application for a permanent order
under section 9(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'').
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants have received a temporary order
exempting them from section 9(a) of the Act, with respect to an
injunction entered against RBC Capital Markets Corporation (``RBC'') on
June 9, 2009 by the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York (``Injunction''), until the Commission takes final
action on an application for a permanent order. Applicants also have
applied for a permanent order.
APPLICANTS: RBC, Voyageur Asset Management Inc. (``Voyageur''),
Tamarack Distributors Inc. (``Tamarack''), and Sky Investment Counsel
Inc. (``Sky'') (collectively, other than RBC, the ``Fund Servicing
Applicants'' and together with RBC, the ``Applicants'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Applicants request that any relief granted pursuant to the
application also apply to any other company of which RBC is or may
become an affiliated person (together with the Applicants, the
``Covered Persons'').
FILING DATE: The application was filed on June 3, 2009. Applicants have
agreed to file an amendment during the notice period, the substance of
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
which is reflected in this notice.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary
and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by
mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on July 6, 2009, and should be accompanied by proof of service on
Applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's
interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons
who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants: RBC, One Liberty
Plaza, 165 Broadway, New York, NY 10006; Voyageur and Tamarack, 100
South Fifth Street, Suite 2300, Minneapolis, MN 55402; and Sky, 1
Adelaide Street East, Suite 2310, Toronto, ON, Canada M5C 2V9.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaea F. Hahn, Senior Counsel, at (202)
551-6870, or Julia Kim Gilmer, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821,
(Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company
Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a temporary order and a
summary of the application. The complete application may be obtained
via the Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or an
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. RBC is a full service investment banking firm engaged in
securities underwriting, sales and trading, investment banking,
financial advisory services and investment research services. RBC is
registered with the Commission as a broker-dealer under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (``Exchange Act'') and as an
investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended (``Advisers Act''). RBC is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary
of Royal Bank of Canada (``Royal Bank''), a Canada-based global
financial services firm.
2. Voyaguer and Sky are registered as investment advisers under the
Advisers Act and provide investment advisory or subadvisory services to
registered investment companies (``Funds''). Voyageur is an indirect,
wholly owned subsidiary of Royal Bank. Royal Bank indirectly owns a
controlling interest in Sky. Tamarack is a broker-dealer registered
under the Exchange Act and serves as principal underwriter to open-end
Funds. None of the Applicants serve as depositor to any Fund.
3. On June 9, 2009, the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York entered a judgment against RBC
(``Judgment'') in a matter brought by the Commission.\2\ The Commission
alleged in the complaint (``Complaint'') that RBC violated section
15(c) of the Exchange Act by misrepresenting to many of its customers
that auction rate securities were safe, highly liquid investments that
were substitutes for cash or money market funds. The Complaint further
alleges that on February 11, 2008, RBC determined not to place bids in
most of its auctions, as it had historically done, resulting in failed
auctions. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the
Complaint, except as to jurisdiction, RBC consented to the entry of the
Injunction and other equitable relief including undertakings to take
various remedial actions for the benefit of purchasers of certain
auction rate securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Securities and Exchange Commission v. RBC Capital Markets
Corporation, Judgment as to Defendant RBC Capital Markets
Corporation, 09-cv-5172 (S.D.N.Y., June 9, 2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 9(a)(2) of the Act, in relevant part, prohibits a person
who has been enjoined from, among other things, engaging in or
continuing any conduct or practice in connection with the purchase or
sale of a security, or in connection with activities as an underwriter,
broker or dealer, from acting, among other things, as an investment
adviser or depositor of any registered investment company or a
principal underwriter for any registered open-end investment company,
registered unit investment trust or registered face-amount certificate
company. Section 9(a)(3) of the Act makes the prohibition in section
9(a)(2) applicable to a company, any affiliated person of which has
been disqualified under the provisions of section 9(a)(2). Section
2(a)(3) of the Act defines ``affiliated person'' to include, among
others, any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by,
or under
[[Page 28291]]
common control with, the other person. Applicants state that RBC is an
affiliated person of each of the other Applicants within the meaning of
section 2(a)(3) of the Act. Applicants state that the entry of the
Injunction results in Applicants being subject to the disqualification
provisions of section 9(a) of the Act.
2. Section 9(c) of the Act provides that the Commission shall grant
an application for exemption from the disqualification provisions of
section 9(a) if it is established that these provisions, as applied to
the Applicants, are unduly or disproportionately severe or that the
Applicants' conduct has been such as not to make it against the public
interest or the protection of investors to grant the exemption.
Applicants have filed an application pursuant to section 9(c) seeking a
temporary and permanent order exempting them and Covered Persons from
the disqualification provisions of section 9(a) of the Act.
3. Applicants believe they meet the standards for exemption
specified in section 9(c). Applicants state that the prohibitions of
section 9(a) as applied to them would be unduly and disproportionately
severe and that the conduct of the Applicants has been such as not to
make it against the public interest or the protection of investors to
grant the exemption from section 9(a).
4. Applicants state that the alleged conduct giving rise to the
Injunction did not involve any of the Applicants acting in the capacity
of investment adviser or subadviser to any Fund or in the capacity of
principal underwriter for any open-end Fund. Applicants also state that
none of the current or former directors, officers, or employees of the
Fund Servicing Applicants had any knowledge of, or had any involvement
in, the conduct alleged in the Complaint. Applicants further state that
the personnel at RBC who were involved in the violations alleged in the
Complaint have had no involvement in providing investment advisory,
subadvisory or principal underwriting services to Funds and will not
have any future involvement in such activities.
5. Applicants state that the inability to continue to provide
investment advisory and subadvisory services to Funds and principal
underwriting services to open-end Funds would result in potential
hardship for the Funds and their shareholders. Applicants state that
they will, as soon as reasonably practical, distribute written
materials, including an offer to meet in person to discuss the
materials, to the boards of directors of the Funds (``Boards'') for
which the Applicants serve as investment adviser, investment subadviser
or principal underwriter, including the directors who are not
``interested persons,'' as defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act, of
such Funds, and their independent legal counsel as defined in rule 0-
1(a)(6) under the Act, relating to the circumstances that led to the
Injunction, any impact on the Funds, and the application. Applicants
state they will provide the Boards with all information concerning the
Injunction and the application that is necessary for the Funds to
fulfill their disclosure and other obligations under the federal
securities laws.
6. Applicants also state that, if they were barred from providing
services to Funds, the effect on their businesses and employees would
be severe. Applicants state that they have committed substantial
resources to establish an expertise in providing advisory and
distribution services to Funds. Applicants further state that
prohibiting them from providing such services would not only adversely
affect their businesses, but would also adversely affect approximately
35 employees who are involved in those activities.
7. Applicants have not previously received an exemption under
section 9(c) as the result of conduct that triggered section 9(a).
Applicants' Condition
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following condition:
Any temporary exemption granted pursuant to the application shall
be without prejudice to, and shall not limit the Commission's rights in
any manner with respect to, any Commission investigation of, or
administrative proceedings involving or against, Covered Persons,
including, without limitation, the consideration by the Commission of a
permanent exemption from section 9(a) of the Act requested pursuant to
the application or the revocation or removal of any temporary
exemptions granted under the Act in connection with the application.
Temporary Order
The Commission has considered the matter and finds that Applicants
have made the necessary showing to justify granting a temporary
exemption.
Accordingly,
It is hereby ordered, pursuant to section 9(c) of the Act, that
Applicants and any other Covered Persons are granted a temporary
exemption from the provisions of section 9(a), solely with respect to
the Injunction, subject to the condition in the application, from June
9, 2009, until the Commission takes final action on their application
for a permanent order.
By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-13980 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P