Civil Penalties, 28204-28209 [E9-13933]
Download as PDF
28204
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Flooding source(s)
* Elevation in feet (NGVD)
+ Elevation in feet (NAVD)
# Depth in feet above
ground
∧ Elevation in meters
(MSL)
Location of referenced elevation**
Effective
Communities affected
Modified
Lincoln County, Missouri, and Incorporated Areas
Cuivre River ..........................
At confluence with Mississippi River at East Sycamore Road, east of City of Old Monroe.
+445
+444
McLean Creek .......................
At confluence with Mississippi River, just east of City
of Winfield.
+446
+445
Mississippi River ...................
At southern county boundary, east of City of Old
Monroe.
+445
+444
Sandy Creek .........................
At northern county boundary at Dameron Road ..........
At confluence with Mississippi River, east of City of
Foley.
+451
+447
+450
+446
Unincorporated Areas of
Lincoln County, City of
Old Monroe.
Unincorporated Areas of
Lincoln County, City of
Winfield.
Unincorporated Areas of
Lincoln County, City of
Elsberry, City of Foley,
City of Old Monroe, City
of Winfield.
Unincorporated Areas of
Lincoln County, City of
Foley.
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
# Depth in feet above ground.
∧ Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at the community map repository (see below) for
exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.
Send comments to William R. Blanton, Jr., Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.
ADDRESSES
City of Elsberry
Maps are available for inspection at 201 Broadway Street, Elsberry, MO 63343.
City of Foley
Maps are available for inspection at 617 Elm Street, Foley, MO 63347.
City of Old Monroe
Maps are available for inspection at 151 Main Street, P.O. Box 212, Old Monroe, MO 63369.
City of Winfield
Maps are available for inspection at 51 Old Troy Highway, P.O. Box 59, Winfield, MO 63389.
Unincorporated Areas of Lincoln County
Maps are available for inspection at 201 Main Street, Troy, MO 63379.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Dated: May 27, 2009.
Deborah S. Ingram,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Mitigation, Mitigation Directorate,
Department of Homeland Security, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9–14039 Filed 6–12–09; 8:45 am]
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 578
[Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0066; Notice 1]
RIN 2127–AK40
Civil Penalties
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This document proposes to
increase the maximum civil penalty
amounts for violations of motor vehicle
safety requirements involving school
buses, bumper standards, consumer
information requirements, odometer
tampering and disclosure requirements,
and vehicle theft protection
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:04 Jun 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements. This action would be
taken pursuant to the Federal Civil
Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment
Act of 1990, as amended by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996,
which requires us to review and, as
warranted, adjust penalties based on
inflation at least every four years.
DATES: Comments on the proposal are
due July 15, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
electronically [identified by DOT Docket
ID Number NHTSA–2009–0066] by
visiting the following Web site:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Alternatively, you can file comments
using the following methods:
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.dms.dot.gov or https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Lang, Office of Chief Counsel,
NHTSA, telephone (202) 366–5902,
facsimile (202) 366–3820, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In order to preserve the remedial
impact of civil penalties and to foster
compliance with the law, the Federal
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461,
Notes, Pub. L. 101–410), as amended by
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104–134) (referred to
collectively as the ‘‘Adjustment Act’’ or,
in context, the ‘‘Act’’), requires us and
other Federal agencies to adjust civil
penalties for inflation. Under the
Adjustment Act, following an initial
adjustment that was capped by the Act,
these agencies must make further
adjustments, as warranted, to the
amounts of penalties in statutes they
administer at least once every four
years.
NHTSA’s initial adjustment of civil
penalties under the Adjustment Act was
published on February 4, 1997. 62 FR
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:04 Jun 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
5167. At that time, we codified the
penalties under statutes administered by
NHTSA, as adjusted, in 49 CFR Part
578, Civil Penalties. On July 14, 1999,
we further adjusted certain penalties. 64
FR 37876. In 2000, the Transportation
Recall Enhancement, Accountability
and Documentation (‘‘TREAD’’) Act
increased the maximum penalties under
the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
Safety Act as amended (sometimes
referred to as the ‘‘Motor Vehicle Safety
Act’’). We codified those amendments
in Part 578 on November 14, 2000. 65
FR 68108. On August 7, 2001, we also
adjusted certain penalty amounts
pertaining to odometer tampering and
disclosure requirements and vehicle
theft prevention. 66 FR 41149. On
September 28, 2004, we adjusted the
maximum penalty amounts for a related
series of violations involving the
agency’s provisions governing vehicle
safety, bumper standards, and consumer
information. 69 FR 57864. On
September 8, 2005, the agency adjusted
its penalty amounts for violations of its
vehicle theft protection standards and
those involving a related series of
odometer-related violations. 70 FR
53308. On May 16, 2006, the agency
adjusted its penalty amounts for
violations of the Motor Vehicle Safety
Act, as amended, and codified
amendments made to the Motor Vehicle
Safety Act by the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act—A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–
LU), 119 Stat. 1144, 1942–43 (Aug. 10,
2005). 71 FR 28279. Most recently, on
February 25, 2008, the agency made
adjustments to odometer-related
violations and violations of certain
administrative provisions of the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act. 73 FR
9955.
The Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 (EISA), Public Law
10–140, 121 Stat. 1492, 1506–07 (Dec.
19, 2007) (codified at 49 U.S.C. 32304A)
established a separate penalty provision
for a new consumer tire information
provision. As a matter of organization,
we intend to include this penalty
provision in 49 CFR 578.6(d). In order
to avoid confusion with the consumer
information penalty regarding
crashworthiness and damage
susceptibility currently in this section,
we would bifurcate to 49 CFR 578.6(d)
into two parts. The first would address
crashworthiness and damage
susceptibility; the second would codify
consumer tire information under EISA.
We have reviewed the civil penalty
amounts in 49 CFR Part 578 and, in this
notice, propose to adjust certain
penalties under the Adjustment Act.
The civil penalties that we propose to
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28205
adjust are available for violations of the
(1) Motor Vehicle Safety Act involving
school buses (single violations and a
related series of violations), (2) bumper
requirements (a related series of
violations), (3) consumer information
requirements regarding crashworthiness
and damage susceptibility (a related
series of violations), (4) odometer
requirements including tampering and
disclosure (a related series of
violations), and (5) the vehicle theft
protection requirements (daily
violations and a series of related
violations).
Method of Calculation—Proposed
Adjustments
Under the Adjustment Act, we first
calculate the inflation adjustment for
each applicable civil penalty by
arithmetically increasing the maximum
civil penalty amount per violation by a
cost-of-living adjustment. Section 5(b) of
the Adjustment Act defines the ‘‘cost-ofliving’’ adjustment as:
The percentage (if any) for each civil
monetary penalty by which—
(1) The Consumer Price Index for the
month of June of the calendar year
preceding the adjustment exceeds
(2) The Consumer Price Index for the
month of June of the calendar year in
which the amount of such civil
monetary penalty was last set or
adjusted pursuant to law.
Because the proposed adjustment is
intended to be effective before
December 31, 2009, the ‘‘Consumer
Price Index [CPI] for the month of June
of the calendar year preceding the
adjustment’’ is the CPI for June 2008.
This figure, based on the Adjustment
Act’s requirement of using the CPI ‘‘for
all-urban consumers published by the
Department of Labor,’’ is 655.5.1
Two of the penalty amounts that
NHTSA proposes to adjust involve a
related series of violations of bumper
standards and of consumer information
requirements regarding crashworthiness
and damage susceptibility. These
amounts were both last adjusted in 2004
(CPI = 568.2). Accordingly, the factor
that we use to calculate the proposed
increases is 1.15 (655.5/568.2) for these
penalties.
The other penalty amounts that
NHTSA proposes to adjust are for single
violations and a related series of
violations pertaining to school bus
1 Individuals interested in deriving the CPI
figures used by the agency may visit the Department
of Labor’s Consumer Price Index Home Page at
https://www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm. Scroll down to
‘‘Most Requested Statistics’’ and select the ‘‘All
Urban Consumers (Current Series)’’ option, select
the ‘‘U.S. ALL ITEMS 1967=100—CUUR0000AA0’’
box, and click on the ‘‘Retrieve Data’’ button.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
28206
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
safety, a related series of violations
involving odometer tampering and
disclosure, as well as single violations
and a related series of violations
involving vehicle theft protection. These
amounts were last adjusted in 2005 (CPI
= 582.6). Accordingly, the factor that we
use to calculate the proposed increases
is 1.13 (655.5/582.6).
Next, using these inflation factors,
increases above the current maximum
penalty levels are calculated and are
then subject to a specific rounding
formula set forth in section 5(a) of the
Adjustment Act. 28 U.S.C. 2461, Notes.
Under that formula:
Any increase shall be rounded to the
nearest:
(1) Multiple of $10 in the case of
penalties less than or equal to $100;
(2) Multiple of $100 in the case of
penalties greater than $100 but less than
or equal to $1,000;
(3) Multiple of $1,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $1,000 but less
than or equal to $10,000;
(4) Multiple of $5,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $10,000 but less
than or equal to $100,000;
(5) Multiple of $10,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $100,000 but less
than or equal to $200,000; and
(6) Multiple of $25,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $200,000.
Proposed Amendments to Maximum
Penalties
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Change to Maximum Penalty (Single
Violations and a Related Series of
Violations) Under the School Bus Safety
Provisions, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301, (49
CFR 578.6(a)(2))
The maximum civil penalty for a
single violation under the school bus
safety provisions is $10,000, as specified
in 49 CFR 578.6(a)(2)(ii). The
underlying statutory provision is 49
U.S.C. 30165(a)(2), as amended in 2005.
Applying the appropriate inflation
factor (1.13) raises the $10,000 to
$11,300, an increase of $1,300. Under
the rounding formula, any increase in a
penalty’s amount shall be rounded to
the nearest $1,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $1,000 but less
than or equal to $10,000. Accordingly,
we propose that § 578.6(a)(2)(ii) be
amended to increase the maximum civil
penalty for a single violation from
$10,000 to $11,000.
The maximum civil penalty for a
related series of violations under the
school bus safety provisions is
$15,000,000, as specified in 49 CFR
578.6(a)(2)(ii). The underlying statutory
provision is 49 U.S.C. 30165(a)(2), as
amended in 2005. Applying the
appropriate inflation factor (1.13) raises
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:04 Jun 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
the $15,000,000 to $16,950,000, an
increase of $1,950,000. Under the
rounding formula, any increase in a
penalty’s amount shall be rounded to
the nearest multiple of $25,000 in the
case of penalties greater than $200,000.
Accordingly, we propose that
§ 578.6(a)(2)(ii) be amended to increase
the maximum civil penalty from
$15,000,000 to $16,950,000 for a series
of related violations.
Change to Maximum Penalty (Related
Series of Violations) Under the Bumper
Standards Provision, 49 U.S.C. Chapter
325 (49 CFR 578.6(c))
The maximum civil penalty for a
related series of violations of the
bumper standards provision or a
regulation prescribed thereunder is
$1,025,000 as specified in 49 CFR
578.6(c)(2). The underlying statutory
civil penalty provision is contained in
49 U.S.C. 32506. Applying the
appropriate inflation factor (1.15) raises
the $1,025,000 figure to $1,178,750, an
increase of $153,750. Under the
rounding formula, any increase in a
penalty’s amount shall be rounded to
the nearest multiple of $25,000 in the
case of penalties greater than $200,000.
In this case, the increase would be
$150,000. Accordingly, we propose that
§ 578.6(c) be amended to increase the
maximum civil penalty from $1,025,000
to $1,175,000 for a related series of
violations.
Change to Maximum Penalty (Related
Series of Violations) Under the
Consumer Information Regarding
Crashworthiness and Damage
Susceptibility Requirements, 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 323 (49 CFR 578.6(d))
The maximum civil penalty for a
related series of violations of the
consumer information regarding
crashworthiness and damage
susceptibility requirements is $500,000,
as specified in 49 CFR 578.6(d). The
underlying statutory civil penalty
provision is 49 U.S.C. 32308(b).
Applying the appropriate inflation
factor (1.15) raises the $500,000 figure to
$575,000, an increase of $75,000. Under
the rounding formula, any increase in a
penalty’s amount shall be rounded to
the nearest multiple of $25,000 in the
case of penalties greater than $200,000.
In this case, the increase would be
$75,000. Accordingly, we propose that
§ 578.6(d) be amended to increase the
maximum civil penalty from $500,000
to $575,000 for a series of related
violations.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Change to Maximum Penalty (Related
Series of Violations) Under the
Odometer Tampering and Disclosure
Requirements, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 327
(49 CFR 578.6(f))
The maximum civil penalty for a
related series of violations of the
odometer requirements is $130,000, as
specified in 49 CFR 578.6(f)(1). The
underlying statutory penalty provision
is 49 U.S.C. 32709. Applying the
appropriate inflation factor (1.13) raises
the $130,000 to $146,900, an increase of
$16,900. Under the rounding formula,
any increase in a penalty’s amount shall
be rounded to the nearest multiple of
$10,000 in the case of penalties greater
than $100,000 but less than or equal to
$200,000. Accordingly, we propose that
§ 578.6(f)(1) be amended to increase the
maximum civil penalty from $130,000
to $150,000 for a series of related
violations.
Change to Maximum Penalty (Daily
Violation and a Related Series of
Violations) Under the Vehicle Theft
Protection Provisions, 49 U.S.C. Chapter
331 (49 CFR 578.6(g)(1), (2))
The maximum civil penalty for a
daily violation of vehicle theft
protection provisions is $130,000, as
specified in 49 CFR 578.6(g)(2). The
underlying statutory penalty provision
is 49 U.S.C. 33114(a)(5). Applying the
appropriate inflation factor (1.13) raises
the $130,000 figure to $146,900, an
increase of $16,900. Under the rounding
formula, any increase in a penalty’s
amount shall be rounded to the nearest
multiple of $10,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $100,000 but less
than or equal to $200,000. Accordingly,
we propose that § 578.6(g)(2) be
amended to increase the maximum civil
penalty from $130,000 to $150,00 for a
daily violation.
The maximum civil penalty for a
related series of violations of the vehicle
theft protection provisions is $325,000,
as specified in 49 CFR 578.6(g)(1). The
underlying statutory penalty provisions
are 49 U.S.C. 33114(a)(1)–(4). Applying
the appropriate inflation factor (1.13)
raises the $325,000 to $367,250, an
increase of $42,250. Under the rounding
formula, any increase in a penalty’s
amount shall be rounded to the nearest
multiple of $25,000 in the case of
penalties greater than $200,000.
Accordingly, we propose that
§ 578.5(g)(1) be amended to increase the
maximum penalty from $325,000 to
$375,000 for a series of related
violations.
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Effective Date of Final Rule
The amendments would be effective
30 days after publication of the final
rule in the Federal Register. The
adjusted penalties would apply to
violations occurring on and after the
effective date.
Request for Comments
How Do I Prepare and Submit
Comments?
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your
comments.
Your comments must not be more
than 15 pages long (49 CFR 553.21). We
established this limit to encourage you
to write your primary comments in a
concise fashion. However, you may
attach necessary additional documents
to your comments. There is no limit on
the length of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your
comments, including the attachments,
to Docket Management at the beginning
of this document under ADDRESSES. You
may also submit your comments
electronically to the docket following
the steps outlined under ADDRESSES.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
How Can I Be Sure That My Comments
Were Received?
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
How Do I Submit Confidential Business
Information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit the following to the Chief
Counsel (NCC–110) at the address given
at the beginning of this document under
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: (1) A complete copy of the
submission; (2) a redacted copy of the
submission with the confidential
information removed; and (3) either a
second complete copy or those portions
of the submission containing the
material for which confidential
treatment is claimed and any additional
information that you deem important to
the Chief Counsel’s consideration of
your confidentiality claim. A request for
confidential treatment that complies
with 49 CFR part 512 must accompany
the complete submission provided to
the Chief Counsel. For further
information, submitters who plan to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:04 Jun 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
request confidential treatment for any
portion of their submissions are advised
to review 49 CFR part 512, particularly
those sections relating to document
submission requirements. Failure to
adhere to the requirements of Part 512
may result in the release of confidential
information to the public docket. In
addition, you should submit two copies
from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business
information, to Docket Management at
the address given at the beginning of
this document under ADDRESSES.
Will the Agency Consider Late
Comments?
We will consider all comments that
Docket Management receives before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated at the beginning
of this notice under DATES. In
accordance with our policies, to the
extent possible, we will also consider
comments that Docket Management
receives after the specified comment
closing date. If Docket Management
receives a comment too late for us to
consider in developing the proposed
rule, we will consider that comment as
an informal suggestion for future
rulemaking action.
How Can I Read the Comments
Submitted by Other People?
You may read the comments received
by Docket Management at the address
and times given near the beginning of
this document under ADDRESSES.
You may also see the comments on
the Internet. To read the comments on
the Internet, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions provided.
You may download the comments.
The comments are imaged documents,
in either TIFF or PDF format. Please
note that even after the comment closing
date, we will continue to file relevant
information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may
submit late comments. Accordingly, we
recommend that you periodically search
the Docket for new material.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
We have considered the impact of this
rulemaking action under Executive
Order 12866 and the Department of
Transportation’s regulatory policies and
procedures. This rulemaking document
was not reviewed under Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review.’’ This action is limited to the
proposed adoption of adjustments of
civil penalties under statutes that the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28207
agency enforces, and has been
determined to be not ‘‘significant’’
under the Department of
Transportation’s regulatory policies and
procedures.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We have also considered the impacts
of this notice under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. I certify that a final rule
based on this proposal will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The following provides the factual basis
for this certification under 5 U.S.C.
605(b).
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) regulations define a small
business in part as a business entity
‘‘which operates primarily within the
United States.’’ 13 CFR 121.105(a).
SBA’s size standards were previously
organized according to Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes.
SIC Code 336211 ‘‘Motor Vehicle Body
Manufacturing’’ applied a small
business size standard of 1,000
employees or fewer. SBA now uses size
standards based on the North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS),
Subsector 336—Transportation
Equipment Manufacturing, which
provides a small business size standard
of 1,000 employees or fewer for
automobile manufacturing businesses.
Other motor vehicle-related industries
have lower size requirements that range
between 500 and 750 employees.
Many small businesses are subject to
the penalty provisions of Title 49 U.S.C.
Chapters 301 (motor vehicles—school
bus safety), 325 (bumper standards), 323
(consumer information requirements),
327 (odometer requirements) and 331
(vehicle theft protection requirements);
therefore, small businesses may be
affected by the proposed adjustments in
this NPRM. By the proposed
amendments, entities that are
potentially affected vary by statute and
may include manufacturers of motor
vehicles and motor vehicle equipment,
sellers of vehicles and equipment, repair
shops and others.
The proposed adjustment to penalty
amounts in 49 U.S.C. 30165(a)(2) and
relating to school bus safety potentially
impacts numerous entities including
school bus manufacturers, school bus
equipment manufacturers, school bus
and equipment sellers, and schools and
school systems. We do not have data on
how many other entities within the
ambit of 49 U.S.C. 30165(a)(2) are small
businesses, but the number is
considerable.
The proposed adjustment to penalty
amounts in Chapter 325 relating to
bumper standards and to penalty
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
28208
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
amounts in Chapter 323 involving
crashworthiness, damage susceptibility
and country of origin labeling
potentially impacts manufacturers of
passenger motor vehicles and, in some
instances, equipment manufacturers as
variously included and defined in the
statutes and regulations. We estimate
that of the 26 light vehicle
manufacturers reporting under the early
warning program (EWR), 49 CFR part
579, six are small businesses. We
recognize that there are other, relatively
low production light vehicle
manufacturers that are not subject to
comprehensive EWR reporting. In
addition, these statutes cover other
entities, but we do not have information
on the number of small businesses.
The proposed adjustment to penalty
amounts in Chapter 327 relating to
odometer requirements potentially
impacts a number of small businesses
including repair businesses, used car
dealers, businesses that are lessors of
vehicles, auction houses, and entities
making devices that could change an
odometer’s mileage. Although we do not
have information on how many of these
entities are small businesses, we believe
a large percentage are small businesses.
The proposed adjustment to penalty
amounts in Chapter 331 relating to theft
prevention potentially impacts
manufacturers of regulated passenger
motor vehicle parts in passenger motor
vehicles, some multi-purpose vehicles,
and some light trucks in high theft lines.
It also impacts other entities including
salvaging, repair and chop shops. As
previously stated, of the twenty six
manufacturers of passenger vehicles, six
are small businesses. Although we do
not have data on the numbers of
salvaging, repair or chop shops, we
believe many are small businesses.
Finally, we note that the new tire fuel
efficiency information program under
49 U.S.C. 32304A may affect a number
of entities. That program has not yet
been adopted and therefore this notice
does not identify regulated entities. In
any event, we note that there are 28 tire
manufacturers, none of which is a small
business. There are estimated to be over
50,000 tire dealers and retailers; though
we do not have information on how
many of these dealers and retailers are
small businesses, we believe a large
percentage is small businesses.
As noted throughout this preamble,
this proposed rule on civil penalties
would only increase the maximum
penalty amounts that the agency could
obtain for certain violations of
provisions related to school bus safety,
bumper standards, certain consumer
information, odometer tampering and
disclosure, and vehicle theft prevention.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:04 Jun 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
This proposed rule does not set the
amount of penalties for any particular
violation or series of violations. Under
the statutes for motor vehicle safety/
school buses, consumer information,
and vehicle theft prevention, the
penalty provisions require the agency to
take into account the size of a business
when determining the appropriate
penalty in an individual case. See 49
U.S.C. 30165(c) (school bus safety); 49
U.S.C. 32308(b)(3) (consumer
information); 49 U.S.C. 33115(a)(3)
(vehicle theft prevention). The statute
for odometers does not directly address
small business size as a consideration,
but does require consideration of ‘‘any
effect on the ability to continue doing
business’’. 49 U.S.C. 32709(a)(3)(B). The
agency would consider the size of the
business in such a calculation. While
the bumper standards penalty provision
does not specifically require the agency
to consider the size of the business, the
agency would consider business size
under its civil penalty policy when
determining the appropriate civil
penalty amount. See 62 FR 37115 (July
10, 1997) (NHTSA’s civil penalty policy
under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)).
The penalty adjustments that are
being proposed would not affect our
civil penalty policy under SBREFA. As
a matter of policy, we intend to
continue to consider the
appropriateness of the penalty amount
to the size of the business charged.
Since this proposed regulation would
not establish penalty amounts, this
proposal will not have a significant
economic impact on small businesses.
Small organizations and governmental
jurisdictions would not be significantly
affected as the price of motor vehicles
and equipment ought not to change as
the result of this proposed rule. As
explained above, this action is limited
to the proposed adoption of a statutory
directive, and has been determined to be
not ‘‘significant’’ under the Department
of Transportation’s regulatory policies
and procedures.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Executive Order 13132 requires
NHTSA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
various levels of government.’’ Under
Executive Order 13132, the agency may
not issue a regulation with Federalism
implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal
government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments, the agency consults with
State and local governments, or the
agency consults with State and local
officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation.
This proposed rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. Thus, the
requirements of Section 6 of the
Executive Order do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–4, requires
agencies to prepare a written assessment
of the cost, benefits and other effects of
proposed or final rules that include a
Federal mandate likely to result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of more than $100
million annually. Because this proposed
rule will not have a $100 million effect,
no Unfunded Mandates assessment will
be prepared.
Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This proposed rule does not have a
retroactive or preemptive effect. Judicial
review of a rule based on this proposal
may be obtained pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
702. That section does not require that
a petition for reconsideration be filed
prior to seeking judicial review.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1980, we state that
there are no requirements for
information collection associated with
this rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 578
Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor
vehicles, Rubber and rubber products,
Tires, Penalties.
In consideration of the foregoing, we
propose to amend 49 CFR part 578 as set
forth below.
PART 578—CIVIL AND CRIMINAL
PENALTIES
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR
part 578 is amended to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 113 / Monday, June 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Authority: Pub. L. No. 101–410, Pub. L.
No. 104–134, 49 U.S.C. 30165, 30170, 30505,
32308, 32309, 32507, 32709, 32710, 32912,
and 33115 as amended; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
2. Section 578.6, paragraphs (a)(2)(ii),
(c)(2), (d), (f)(1), and (g), are revised to
read as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
§ 578.6 Civil penalties for violations of
specified provisions of Title 49 of the United
States Code.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Violates section 30112(a)(2) of
Title 49 United States Code, shall be
subject to a civil penalty of not more
than $11,000 for each violation. A
separate violation occurs for each motor
vehicle or item of motor vehicle
equipment and for each failure or
refusal to allow or perform an act
required by this section. The maximum
penalty under this paragraph for a
related series of violations is
$16,950,000.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) The maximum civil penalty under
this paragraph (c) for a related series of
violations is $1,175,000.
(d) Consumer Information—(1)
Crashworthiness and Damage
Susceptibility. A person that violates 49
U.S.C. 32308(a), regarding
crashworthiness and damage
susceptibility, is liable to the United
States Government for a civil penalty of
not more than $1,100 for each violation.
Each failure to provide information or
comply with a regulation in violation of
49 U.S.C. 32308(a) is a separate
violation. The maximum penalty under
this paragraph for a related series of
violations is $575,000
(2) Consumer Tire Information. A
person that violates 49 U.S.C. 32308(c),
regarding consumer tire information
established under 49 U.S.C. 32304A, is
liable to the United States Government
for a civil penalty of not more than
$50,000 for each violation.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) A person that violates 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 327 or a regulation prescribed
or order issued thereunder is liable to
the United States Government for a civil
penalty of not more than $2,200 for each
violation. The maximum civil penalty
under this paragraph for a related series
of violations is $150,000.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Vehicle theft protection. (1) A
person that violates 49 U.S.C.
33114(a)(1)–(4) is liable to the United
States Government for a civil penalty of
not more than $1,100 for each violation.
The failure of more than one part of a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:04 Jun 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
single motor vehicle to conform to an
applicable standard under 49 U.S.C.
33102 and 33103 is only a single
violation. The maximum penalty under
this paragraph for a related series of
violations is $375,000.
(2) A person that violates 49 U.S.C.
33114(a)(5) is liable to the United States
Government for a civil penalty of not
more than $150,000 a day for each
violation.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued on: June 9, 2009.
Stephen P. Wood,
Acting Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9–13933 Filed 6–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 581
[Docket Number NHTSA–2009–0047]
Bumper Standard; Petition for
Rulemaking
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for comments.
SUMMARY: On July 1, 2008, the Insurance
Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS)
petitioned the agency to amend the
existing bumper standard, to require
compliance by light trucks, vans, and
sport utility vehicles (SUVs), which
NHTSA often refers to collectively as
LTVs. The agency had already begun reevaluating the bumper standard in
anticipation of the vote on a Global
Technical Regulation on pedestrian
safety. NHTSA requests comments and
information to assist the agency in
determining whether to grant or deny
the IIHS petition.
DATES: You should submit your
comments early enough to ensure that
Docket Management receives them not
later than August 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the
docket notice number cited at the
beginning of this notice and be
submitted to Docket Management, Room
W12–140, ground level, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28209
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Telephone:
1–800–647–5527.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
docketsinfo.dot.gov/.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to the street
address listed above. The internet access
to the docket will be at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hisham Mohamed, Consumer Standards
Division, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Ave., SE., West Building, Room W43–
437, NVS–131, Washington, DC 20590.
Mr. Mohamed’s telephone number is
202–366–0307; E-mail:
hisham.mohamed@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The agency’s bumper standard, set
forth at 49 CFR part 581, establishes
requirements for the impact resistance
of vehicles in low speed front and rear
collisions. The purpose of the standard
is to reduce physical damage to the front
and rear ends of a passenger motor
vehicle from low speed collisions. The
standard applies to passenger motor
vehicles other than multipurpose
passenger vehicles and low speed
vehicles.
The history of the Part 581 bumper
standard has been long and complex. In
its initial efforts in the field of bumper
regulation, NHTSA issued Federal
E:\FR\FM\15JNP1.SGM
15JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 113 (Monday, June 15, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28204-28209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13933]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 578
[Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0066; Notice 1]
RIN 2127-AK40
Civil Penalties
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to increase the maximum civil penalty
amounts for violations of motor vehicle safety requirements involving
school buses, bumper standards, consumer information requirements,
odometer tampering and disclosure requirements, and vehicle theft
protection requirements. This action would be taken pursuant to the
Federal Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as
amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, which requires
us to review and, as warranted, adjust penalties based on inflation at
least every four years.
DATES: Comments on the proposal are due July 15, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments electronically [identified by DOT
Docket ID Number NHTSA-2009-0066] by visiting the following Web site:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Alternatively, you can file comments using the following methods:
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200
[[Page 28205]]
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public
Participation heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.dms.dot.gov or https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Lang, Office of Chief Counsel,
NHTSA, telephone (202) 366-5902, facsimile (202) 366-3820, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In order to preserve the remedial impact of civil penalties and to
foster compliance with the law, the Federal Civil Monetary Penalty
Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461, Notes, Pub. L. 101-
410), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104-134) (referred to collectively as the ``Adjustment Act'' or, in
context, the ``Act''), requires us and other Federal agencies to adjust
civil penalties for inflation. Under the Adjustment Act, following an
initial adjustment that was capped by the Act, these agencies must make
further adjustments, as warranted, to the amounts of penalties in
statutes they administer at least once every four years.
NHTSA's initial adjustment of civil penalties under the Adjustment
Act was published on February 4, 1997. 62 FR 5167. At that time, we
codified the penalties under statutes administered by NHTSA, as
adjusted, in 49 CFR Part 578, Civil Penalties. On July 14, 1999, we
further adjusted certain penalties. 64 FR 37876. In 2000, the
Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation
(``TREAD'') Act increased the maximum penalties under the National
Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act as amended (sometimes referred to
as the ``Motor Vehicle Safety Act''). We codified those amendments in
Part 578 on November 14, 2000. 65 FR 68108. On August 7, 2001, we also
adjusted certain penalty amounts pertaining to odometer tampering and
disclosure requirements and vehicle theft prevention. 66 FR 41149. On
September 28, 2004, we adjusted the maximum penalty amounts for a
related series of violations involving the agency's provisions
governing vehicle safety, bumper standards, and consumer information.
69 FR 57864. On September 8, 2005, the agency adjusted its penalty
amounts for violations of its vehicle theft protection standards and
those involving a related series of odometer-related violations. 70 FR
53308. On May 16, 2006, the agency adjusted its penalty amounts for
violations of the Motor Vehicle Safety Act, as amended, and codified
amendments made to the Motor Vehicle Safety Act by the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act--A Legacy
for Users (SAFETEA-LU), 119 Stat. 1144, 1942-43 (Aug. 10, 2005). 71 FR
28279. Most recently, on February 25, 2008, the agency made adjustments
to odometer-related violations and violations of certain administrative
provisions of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. 73 FR 9955.
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), Public Law
10-140, 121 Stat. 1492, 1506-07 (Dec. 19, 2007) (codified at 49 U.S.C.
32304A) established a separate penalty provision for a new consumer
tire information provision. As a matter of organization, we intend to
include this penalty provision in 49 CFR 578.6(d). In order to avoid
confusion with the consumer information penalty regarding
crashworthiness and damage susceptibility currently in this section, we
would bifurcate to 49 CFR 578.6(d) into two parts. The first would
address crashworthiness and damage susceptibility; the second would
codify consumer tire information under EISA.
We have reviewed the civil penalty amounts in 49 CFR Part 578 and,
in this notice, propose to adjust certain penalties under the
Adjustment Act. The civil penalties that we propose to adjust are
available for violations of the (1) Motor Vehicle Safety Act involving
school buses (single violations and a related series of violations),
(2) bumper requirements (a related series of violations), (3) consumer
information requirements regarding crashworthiness and damage
susceptibility (a related series of violations), (4) odometer
requirements including tampering and disclosure (a related series of
violations), and (5) the vehicle theft protection requirements (daily
violations and a series of related violations).
Method of Calculation--Proposed Adjustments
Under the Adjustment Act, we first calculate the inflation
adjustment for each applicable civil penalty by arithmetically
increasing the maximum civil penalty amount per violation by a cost-of-
living adjustment. Section 5(b) of the Adjustment Act defines the
``cost-of-living'' adjustment as:
The percentage (if any) for each civil monetary penalty by which--
(1) The Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar
year preceding the adjustment exceeds
(2) The Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar
year in which the amount of such civil monetary penalty was last set or
adjusted pursuant to law.
Because the proposed adjustment is intended to be effective before
December 31, 2009, the ``Consumer Price Index [CPI] for the month of
June of the calendar year preceding the adjustment'' is the CPI for
June 2008. This figure, based on the Adjustment Act's requirement of
using the CPI ``for all-urban consumers published by the Department of
Labor,'' is 655.5.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Individuals interested in deriving the CPI figures used by
the agency may visit the Department of Labor's Consumer Price Index
Home Page at https://www.bls.gov/cpi/home.htm. Scroll down to ``Most
Requested Statistics'' and select the ``All Urban Consumers (Current
Series)'' option, select the ``U.S. ALL ITEMS 1967=100--
CUUR0000AA0'' box, and click on the ``Retrieve Data'' button.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two of the penalty amounts that NHTSA proposes to adjust involve a
related series of violations of bumper standards and of consumer
information requirements regarding crashworthiness and damage
susceptibility. These amounts were both last adjusted in 2004 (CPI =
568.2). Accordingly, the factor that we use to calculate the proposed
increases is 1.15 (655.5/568.2) for these penalties.
The other penalty amounts that NHTSA proposes to adjust are for
single violations and a related series of violations pertaining to
school bus
[[Page 28206]]
safety, a related series of violations involving odometer tampering and
disclosure, as well as single violations and a related series of
violations involving vehicle theft protection. These amounts were last
adjusted in 2005 (CPI = 582.6). Accordingly, the factor that we use to
calculate the proposed increases is 1.13 (655.5/582.6).
Next, using these inflation factors, increases above the current
maximum penalty levels are calculated and are then subject to a
specific rounding formula set forth in section 5(a) of the Adjustment
Act. 28 U.S.C. 2461, Notes. Under that formula:
Any increase shall be rounded to the nearest:
(1) Multiple of $10 in the case of penalties less than or equal to
$100;
(2) Multiple of $100 in the case of penalties greater than $100 but
less than or equal to $1,000;
(3) Multiple of $1,000 in the case of penalties greater than $1,000
but less than or equal to $10,000;
(4) Multiple of $5,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$10,000 but less than or equal to $100,000;
(5) Multiple of $10,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$100,000 but less than or equal to $200,000; and
(6) Multiple of $25,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$200,000.
Proposed Amendments to Maximum Penalties
Change to Maximum Penalty (Single Violations and a Related Series of
Violations) Under the School Bus Safety Provisions, 49 U.S.C. Chapter
301, (49 CFR 578.6(a)(2))
The maximum civil penalty for a single violation under the school
bus safety provisions is $10,000, as specified in 49 CFR
578.6(a)(2)(ii). The underlying statutory provision is 49 U.S.C.
30165(a)(2), as amended in 2005. Applying the appropriate inflation
factor (1.13) raises the $10,000 to $11,300, an increase of $1,300.
Under the rounding formula, any increase in a penalty's amount shall be
rounded to the nearest $1,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$1,000 but less than or equal to $10,000. Accordingly, we propose that
Sec. 578.6(a)(2)(ii) be amended to increase the maximum civil penalty
for a single violation from $10,000 to $11,000.
The maximum civil penalty for a related series of violations under
the school bus safety provisions is $15,000,000, as specified in 49 CFR
578.6(a)(2)(ii). The underlying statutory provision is 49 U.S.C.
30165(a)(2), as amended in 2005. Applying the appropriate inflation
factor (1.13) raises the $15,000,000 to $16,950,000, an increase of
$1,950,000. Under the rounding formula, any increase in a penalty's
amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $25,000 in the case
of penalties greater than $200,000. Accordingly, we propose that Sec.
578.6(a)(2)(ii) be amended to increase the maximum civil penalty from
$15,000,000 to $16,950,000 for a series of related violations.
Change to Maximum Penalty (Related Series of Violations) Under the
Bumper Standards Provision, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 325 (49 CFR 578.6(c))
The maximum civil penalty for a related series of violations of the
bumper standards provision or a regulation prescribed thereunder is
$1,025,000 as specified in 49 CFR 578.6(c)(2). The underlying statutory
civil penalty provision is contained in 49 U.S.C. 32506. Applying the
appropriate inflation factor (1.15) raises the $1,025,000 figure to
$1,178,750, an increase of $153,750. Under the rounding formula, any
increase in a penalty's amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple
of $25,000 in the case of penalties greater than $200,000. In this
case, the increase would be $150,000. Accordingly, we propose that
Sec. 578.6(c) be amended to increase the maximum civil penalty from
$1,025,000 to $1,175,000 for a related series of violations.
Change to Maximum Penalty (Related Series of Violations) Under the
Consumer Information Regarding Crashworthiness and Damage
Susceptibility Requirements, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 323 (49 CFR 578.6(d))
The maximum civil penalty for a related series of violations of the
consumer information regarding crashworthiness and damage
susceptibility requirements is $500,000, as specified in 49 CFR
578.6(d). The underlying statutory civil penalty provision is 49 U.S.C.
32308(b). Applying the appropriate inflation factor (1.15) raises the
$500,000 figure to $575,000, an increase of $75,000. Under the rounding
formula, any increase in a penalty's amount shall be rounded to the
nearest multiple of $25,000 in the case of penalties greater than
$200,000. In this case, the increase would be $75,000. Accordingly, we
propose that Sec. 578.6(d) be amended to increase the maximum civil
penalty from $500,000 to $575,000 for a series of related violations.
Change to Maximum Penalty (Related Series of Violations) Under the
Odometer Tampering and Disclosure Requirements, 49 U.S.C. Chapter 327
(49 CFR 578.6(f))
The maximum civil penalty for a related series of violations of the
odometer requirements is $130,000, as specified in 49 CFR 578.6(f)(1).
The underlying statutory penalty provision is 49 U.S.C. 32709. Applying
the appropriate inflation factor (1.13) raises the $130,000 to
$146,900, an increase of $16,900. Under the rounding formula, any
increase in a penalty's amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple
of $10,000 in the case of penalties greater than $100,000 but less than
or equal to $200,000. Accordingly, we propose that Sec. 578.6(f)(1) be
amended to increase the maximum civil penalty from $130,000 to $150,000
for a series of related violations.
Change to Maximum Penalty (Daily Violation and a Related Series of
Violations) Under the Vehicle Theft Protection Provisions, 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 331 (49 CFR 578.6(g)(1), (2))
The maximum civil penalty for a daily violation of vehicle theft
protection provisions is $130,000, as specified in 49 CFR 578.6(g)(2).
The underlying statutory penalty provision is 49 U.S.C. 33114(a)(5).
Applying the appropriate inflation factor (1.13) raises the $130,000
figure to $146,900, an increase of $16,900. Under the rounding formula,
any increase in a penalty's amount shall be rounded to the nearest
multiple of $10,000 in the case of penalties greater than $100,000 but
less than or equal to $200,000. Accordingly, we propose that Sec.
578.6(g)(2) be amended to increase the maximum civil penalty from
$130,000 to $150,00 for a daily violation.
The maximum civil penalty for a related series of violations of the
vehicle theft protection provisions is $325,000, as specified in 49 CFR
578.6(g)(1). The underlying statutory penalty provisions are 49 U.S.C.
33114(a)(1)-(4). Applying the appropriate inflation factor (1.13)
raises the $325,000 to $367,250, an increase of $42,250. Under the
rounding formula, any increase in a penalty's amount shall be rounded
to the nearest multiple of $25,000 in the case of penalties greater
than $200,000. Accordingly, we propose that Sec. 578.5(g)(1) be
amended to increase the maximum penalty from $325,000 to $375,000 for a
series of related violations.
[[Page 28207]]
Effective Date of Final Rule
The amendments would be effective 30 days after publication of the
final rule in the Federal Register. The adjusted penalties would apply
to violations occurring on and after the effective date.
Request for Comments
How Do I Prepare and Submit Comments?
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your comments.
Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long (49 CFR 553.21).
We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary
comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary
additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length
of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your comments, including the
attachments, to Docket Management at the beginning of this document
under ADDRESSES. You may also submit your comments electronically to
the docket following the steps outlined under ADDRESSES.
How Can I Be Sure That My Comments Were Received?
If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of
your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the
envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by mail.
How Do I Submit Confidential Business Information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit the following to the Chief Counsel
(NCC-110) at the address given at the beginning of this document under
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) A complete copy of the
submission; (2) a redacted copy of the submission with the confidential
information removed; and (3) either a second complete copy or those
portions of the submission containing the material for which
confidential treatment is claimed and any additional information that
you deem important to the Chief Counsel's consideration of your
confidentiality claim. A request for confidential treatment that
complies with 49 CFR part 512 must accompany the complete submission
provided to the Chief Counsel. For further information, submitters who
plan to request confidential treatment for any portion of their
submissions are advised to review 49 CFR part 512, particularly those
sections relating to document submission requirements. Failure to
adhere to the requirements of Part 512 may result in the release of
confidential information to the public docket. In addition, you should
submit two copies from which you have deleted the claimed confidential
business information, to Docket Management at the address given at the
beginning of this document under ADDRESSES.
Will the Agency Consider Late Comments?
We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives
before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated at
the beginning of this notice under DATES. In accordance with our
policies, to the extent possible, we will also consider comments that
Docket Management receives after the specified comment closing date. If
Docket Management receives a comment too late for us to consider in
developing the proposed rule, we will consider that comment as an
informal suggestion for future rulemaking action.
How Can I Read the Comments Submitted by Other People?
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the
address and times given near the beginning of this document under
ADDRESSES.
You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments
on the Internet, go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the on-
line instructions provided.
You may download the comments. The comments are imaged documents,
in either TIFF or PDF format. Please note that even after the comment
closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late
comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search the
Docket for new material.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
We have considered the impact of this rulemaking action under
Executive Order 12866 and the Department of Transportation's regulatory
policies and procedures. This rulemaking document was not reviewed
under Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review.'' This
action is limited to the proposed adoption of adjustments of civil
penalties under statutes that the agency enforces, and has been
determined to be not ``significant'' under the Department of
Transportation's regulatory policies and procedures.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We have also considered the impacts of this notice under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. I certify that a final rule based on this
proposal will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The following provides the factual basis for
this certification under 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
The Small Business Administration (SBA) regulations define a small
business in part as a business entity ``which operates primarily within
the United States.'' 13 CFR 121.105(a). SBA's size standards were
previously organized according to Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) Codes. SIC Code 336211 ``Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing''
applied a small business size standard of 1,000 employees or fewer. SBA
now uses size standards based on the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS), Subsector 336--Transportation Equipment
Manufacturing, which provides a small business size standard of 1,000
employees or fewer for automobile manufacturing businesses. Other motor
vehicle-related industries have lower size requirements that range
between 500 and 750 employees.
Many small businesses are subject to the penalty provisions of
Title 49 U.S.C. Chapters 301 (motor vehicles--school bus safety), 325
(bumper standards), 323 (consumer information requirements), 327
(odometer requirements) and 331 (vehicle theft protection
requirements); therefore, small businesses may be affected by the
proposed adjustments in this NPRM. By the proposed amendments, entities
that are potentially affected vary by statute and may include
manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment, sellers of
vehicles and equipment, repair shops and others.
The proposed adjustment to penalty amounts in 49 U.S.C. 30165(a)(2)
and relating to school bus safety potentially impacts numerous entities
including school bus manufacturers, school bus equipment manufacturers,
school bus and equipment sellers, and schools and school systems. We do
not have data on how many other entities within the ambit of 49 U.S.C.
30165(a)(2) are small businesses, but the number is considerable.
The proposed adjustment to penalty amounts in Chapter 325 relating
to bumper standards and to penalty
[[Page 28208]]
amounts in Chapter 323 involving crashworthiness, damage susceptibility
and country of origin labeling potentially impacts manufacturers of
passenger motor vehicles and, in some instances, equipment
manufacturers as variously included and defined in the statutes and
regulations. We estimate that of the 26 light vehicle manufacturers
reporting under the early warning program (EWR), 49 CFR part 579, six
are small businesses. We recognize that there are other, relatively low
production light vehicle manufacturers that are not subject to
comprehensive EWR reporting. In addition, these statutes cover other
entities, but we do not have information on the number of small
businesses.
The proposed adjustment to penalty amounts in Chapter 327 relating
to odometer requirements potentially impacts a number of small
businesses including repair businesses, used car dealers, businesses
that are lessors of vehicles, auction houses, and entities making
devices that could change an odometer's mileage. Although we do not
have information on how many of these entities are small businesses, we
believe a large percentage are small businesses.
The proposed adjustment to penalty amounts in Chapter 331 relating
to theft prevention potentially impacts manufacturers of regulated
passenger motor vehicle parts in passenger motor vehicles, some multi-
purpose vehicles, and some light trucks in high theft lines. It also
impacts other entities including salvaging, repair and chop shops. As
previously stated, of the twenty six manufacturers of passenger
vehicles, six are small businesses. Although we do not have data on the
numbers of salvaging, repair or chop shops, we believe many are small
businesses.
Finally, we note that the new tire fuel efficiency information
program under 49 U.S.C. 32304A may affect a number of entities. That
program has not yet been adopted and therefore this notice does not
identify regulated entities. In any event, we note that there are 28
tire manufacturers, none of which is a small business. There are
estimated to be over 50,000 tire dealers and retailers; though we do
not have information on how many of these dealers and retailers are
small businesses, we believe a large percentage is small businesses.
As noted throughout this preamble, this proposed rule on civil
penalties would only increase the maximum penalty amounts that the
agency could obtain for certain violations of provisions related to
school bus safety, bumper standards, certain consumer information,
odometer tampering and disclosure, and vehicle theft prevention. This
proposed rule does not set the amount of penalties for any particular
violation or series of violations. Under the statutes for motor vehicle
safety/school buses, consumer information, and vehicle theft
prevention, the penalty provisions require the agency to take into
account the size of a business when determining the appropriate penalty
in an individual case. See 49 U.S.C. 30165(c) (school bus safety); 49
U.S.C. 32308(b)(3) (consumer information); 49 U.S.C. 33115(a)(3)
(vehicle theft prevention). The statute for odometers does not directly
address small business size as a consideration, but does require
consideration of ``any effect on the ability to continue doing
business''. 49 U.S.C. 32709(a)(3)(B). The agency would consider the
size of the business in such a calculation. While the bumper standards
penalty provision does not specifically require the agency to consider
the size of the business, the agency would consider business size under
its civil penalty policy when determining the appropriate civil penalty
amount. See 62 FR 37115 (July 10, 1997) (NHTSA's civil penalty policy
under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)).
The penalty adjustments that are being proposed would not affect
our civil penalty policy under SBREFA. As a matter of policy, we intend
to continue to consider the appropriateness of the penalty amount to
the size of the business charged.
Since this proposed regulation would not establish penalty amounts,
this proposal will not have a significant economic impact on small
businesses.
Small organizations and governmental jurisdictions would not be
significantly affected as the price of motor vehicles and equipment
ought not to change as the result of this proposed rule. As explained
above, this action is limited to the proposed adoption of a statutory
directive, and has been determined to be not ``significant'' under the
Department of Transportation's regulatory policies and procedures.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Executive Order 13132 requires NHTSA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, the agency may not issue a
regulation with Federalism implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless
the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, the agency
consults with State and local governments, or the agency consults with
State and local officials early in the process of developing the
proposed regulation.
This proposed rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132.
Thus, the requirements of Section 6 of the Executive Order do not
apply.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4,
requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the cost, benefits
and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a Federal
mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than
$100 million annually. Because this proposed rule will not have a $100
million effect, no Unfunded Mandates assessment will be prepared.
Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice Reform)
This proposed rule does not have a retroactive or preemptive
effect. Judicial review of a rule based on this proposal may be
obtained pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 702. That section does not require that a
petition for reconsideration be filed prior to seeking judicial review.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, we state
that there are no requirements for information collection associated
with this rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 578
Imports, Motor vehicle safety, Motor vehicles, Rubber and rubber
products, Tires, Penalties.
In consideration of the foregoing, we propose to amend 49 CFR part
578 as set forth below.
PART 578--CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR part 578 is amended to read as
follows:
[[Page 28209]]
Authority: Pub. L. No. 101-410, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 49 U.S.C.
30165, 30170, 30505, 32308, 32309, 32507, 32709, 32710, 32912, and
33115 as amended; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
2. Section 578.6, paragraphs (a)(2)(ii), (c)(2), (d), (f)(1), and
(g), are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 578.6 Civil penalties for violations of specified provisions of
Title 49 of the United States Code.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Violates section 30112(a)(2) of Title 49 United States Code,
shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $11,000 for each
violation. A separate violation occurs for each motor vehicle or item
of motor vehicle equipment and for each failure or refusal to allow or
perform an act required by this section. The maximum penalty under this
paragraph for a related series of violations is $16,950,000.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) The maximum civil penalty under this paragraph (c) for a
related series of violations is $1,175,000.
(d) Consumer Information--(1) Crashworthiness and Damage
Susceptibility. A person that violates 49 U.S.C. 32308(a), regarding
crashworthiness and damage susceptibility, is liable to the United
States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $1,100 for each
violation. Each failure to provide information or comply with a
regulation in violation of 49 U.S.C. 32308(a) is a separate violation.
The maximum penalty under this paragraph for a related series of
violations is $575,000
(2) Consumer Tire Information. A person that violates 49 U.S.C.
32308(c), regarding consumer tire information established under 49
U.S.C. 32304A, is liable to the United States Government for a civil
penalty of not more than $50,000 for each violation.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) A person that violates 49 U.S.C. Chapter 327 or a regulation
prescribed or order issued thereunder is liable to the United States
Government for a civil penalty of not more than $2,200 for each
violation. The maximum civil penalty under this paragraph for a related
series of violations is $150,000.
* * * * *
(g) Vehicle theft protection. (1) A person that violates 49 U.S.C.
33114(a)(1)-(4) is liable to the United States Government for a civil
penalty of not more than $1,100 for each violation. The failure of more
than one part of a single motor vehicle to conform to an applicable
standard under 49 U.S.C. 33102 and 33103 is only a single violation.
The maximum penalty under this paragraph for a related series of
violations is $375,000.
(2) A person that violates 49 U.S.C. 33114(a)(5) is liable to the
United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $150,000
a day for each violation.
* * * * *
Issued on: June 9, 2009.
Stephen P. Wood,
Acting Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-13933 Filed 6-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P