Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change as Amended, Relating to the Adoption of FINRA Rule 2080 (Obtaining an Order of Expungement of Customer Dispute Information From the Central Registration Depository (CRD System)), FINRA Rule 2310 (Direct Participation Programs), FINRA Rule 4551 (Requirements for Alternative Trading Systems to Record and Transmit Order and Execution Information for Security Futures) and FINRA Rule 2266 (SIPC Information) in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook, 26902-26903 [E9-12997]
Download as PDF
26902
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Notices
exchange.6 In particular, it is consistent
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,7 which
requires that the rules of a national
securities exchange provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
members and issuers and other parties
using its facilities, and Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,8 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and
not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission also finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6(b)(8) of the
Act,9 which requires that the rules of an
exchange not impose any burden on
competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Finally, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Rule
603(a) of Regulation NMS,10 adopted
under Section 11A(c)(1) of the Act,
which requires an exclusive processor
that distributes information with respect
to quotations for or transactions in an
NMS stock to do so on terms that are
fair and reasonable and that are not
unreasonably discriminatory.11
This proposal would make permanent
the NYSE Arca Realtime Reference
Prices service and make permanent the
$30,000 flat monthly fee for that
service.12 The Commission has
reviewed the proposal using the
approach set forth in the NYSE Arca
Order for non-core market data fees.13
There are a variety of alternative sources
6 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
10 17 CFR 242.603(a).
11 NYSE Arca is an exclusive processor of the
NYSE Arca Realtime Reference Prices service under
Section 3(a)(22)(B) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.
78c(a)(22)(B), which defines an exclusive processor
as, among other things, an exchange that distributes
information with respect to quotations or
transactions on an exclusive basis on its own
behalf.
12 See supra note 4.
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039
(December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770 (December 9,
2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21) (‘‘NYSE Arca
Order’’). In the NYSE Arca Order, the Commission
describes the competitive factors that apply to noncore market data products. The Commission hereby
incorporates by reference the data and analysis from
the NYSE Arca Order into this order.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
of information that impose significant
competitive pressures on NYSE Arca in
setting the terms for distributing the
NYSE Arca Realtime Reference Prices
service. The Commission believes that
the availability of those alternatives, as
well as NYSE Arca’s compelling need to
attract order flow, imposed significant
competitive pressure on NYSE Arca to
act equitably, fairly, and reasonably in
setting the terms of its proposal.
Because NYSE Arca was subject to
significant competitive forces in setting
the terms of the proposal, the
Commission will approve the proposal
in the absence of a substantial
countervailing basis to find that its
terms nevertheless fail to meet an
applicable requirement of the Act or the
rules thereunder. An analysis of the
proposal does not provide such a basis.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,14 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSEArca–
2009–32), be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–13039 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to (1) adopt NASD Rules 2130
(Obtaining an Order of Expungement of
Customer Dispute Information from the
Central Registration Depository (CRD
System)), 2810 (Direct Participation
Programs) and 3115 (Requirements for
Alternative Trading Systems to Record
and Transmit Order and Execution
Information for Security Futures) as
FINRA rules in the consolidated FINRA
rulebook without material change; and
(2) adopt NASD Rule 2342 (SIPC
Information) in the consolidated FINRA
rulebook without material change and to
delete NYSE Rule 409A (SIPC
Disclosures). The proposed rule change
would renumber NASD Rule 2130 as
FINRA Rule 2080, NASD Rule 2810 as
FINRA Rule 2310, NASD Rule 3115 as
FINRA Rule 4551 and NASD Rule 2342
as FINRA Rule 2266 in the consolidated
FINRA rulebook. On April 14, 2009,
FINRA filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed Rule Change.3 The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on April 15,
2009.4 The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposed rule
change. This order approves the
proposed rule change as amended.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
[Release No. 34–59987; File No. SR–FINRA–
2009–016]
FINRA is proposing to adopt NASD
Rule 2130 without material change in
the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook as
FINRA Rule 2080. NASD Rule 2130
addresses the expungement of customer
dispute information from the Central
Registration Depository system.
FINRA is proposing to adopt NASD
Rule 2810 without material change in
the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook as
FINRA Rule 2310. NASD Rule 2810
addresses underwriting terms and
arrangements in public offerings of
direct participation programs and
unlisted real estate investment trusts.
FINRA is proposing to adopt NASD
Rule 3115 without material change in
the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook as
FINRA Rule 4551. NASD Rule 3115
(Requirements for Alternative Trading
Systems to Record and Transmit Order
and Execution Information for Security
Futures) requires alternative trading
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change as Amended,
Relating to the Adoption of FINRA Rule
2080 (Obtaining an Order of
Expungement of Customer Dispute
Information From the Central
Registration Depository (CRD
System)), FINRA Rule 2310 (Direct
Participation Programs), FINRA Rule
4551 (Requirements for Alternative
Trading Systems to Record and
Transmit Order and Execution
Information for Security Futures) and
FINRA Rule 2266 (SIPC Information) in
the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook
May 27, 2009.
I. Introduction
On March 25, 2009, Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’) (f/k/a National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’))
14 15
15 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the
original filing.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59771
(April 15, 2009), 74 FR 18411.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Notices
systems (‘‘ATSs’’) 5 that accept orders
for security futures 6 to record and
report to FINRA certain information
regarding those orders, including the
date and time the order was received,
the security future product name and
symbol, the details of the order, and the
date and time that the order was
executed. The rule provides FINRA with
an audit trail of orders for security
futures placed on an ATS.
FINRA is proposing to adopt NASD
Rule 2342 without material change in
the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook as
FINRA Rule 2266 and to delete
comparable Incorporated NYSE Rule
409A. NASD Rule 2342 and
Incorporated NYSE Rule 409A were
adopted in response to a May 2001
report issued by the Government
Accountability Office (‘‘GAO’’), entitled
‘‘Securities Investor Protection: Steps
Needed to Better Disclose SIPC Policies
to Investors.’’ 7
III. Discussion and Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities association.8 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the
Act,9 which requires, among other
things, that FINRA rules be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Commission believes that that
transferring NASD Rule 2130 into the
Consolidated FINRA Rulebook will
ensure that its standards and procedures
regarding expungement of customer
dispute information from the CRD
continue to be reasonably designed to
ensure that information submitted to
5 ATSs generally are registered broker-dealers that
provide or maintain a marketplace for bringing
together purchasers and sellers of securities or
otherwise perform the functions commonly
performed by a securities exchange but do not
perform self-regulatory functions.
6 A security future is a contract of sale for future
delivery of a single security or of a narrow-based
security index. Security futures are defined as
‘‘securities’’ under the Act; consequently, the
federal securities laws are generally applicable to
security futures. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10).
7 See U.S. Government Accountability Office,
‘‘Securities Investor Protection: Steps Needed to
Better Disclose SIPC Policies to Investors,’’
Publication GAO–01–653 (May 25, 2001).
8 In approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
9 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:16 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
and maintained in the CRD is accurate
and complete. The Commission believes
that transferring NASD Rule 2810 into
the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook will
ensure that policies and procedures
regarding FINRA’s members’
participation in public offerings of
Investment Programs continue to meet
statutory mandates. The Commission
believes that transferring NASD Rule
3115 into the Consolidated FINRA
Rulebook will continue to allow ATSs
to provide trading facilities for security
futures while also ensuring that FINRA
will receive sufficient information to
maintain an audit trail regarding the
trading of security futures on ATSs.
Finally, the Commission believes that
transferring NASD Rule 2342 into the
Consolidated FINRA Rulebook will
continue to ensure that SIPC
information is provided to customers
effectively. The proposed rule change
makes non-material changes to rules
that have proven effective in meeting
the statutory mandates.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,10 that the
proposed rule change (SR–FINRA–
2009–016), as amended, be, and hereby
is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–12997 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
26903
by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated the proposed rule change as
constituting a non-controversial rule
change under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act,3 which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to modify
the terms and conditions under which
the Exchange is affiliated with NASDAQ
Options Services, LLC (‘‘NOS’’). The
Exchange proposes to implement the
proposed rule change when NASDAQ
OMX PHLX, Inc. (‘‘PHLX’’) implements
its XL II trading system.4 There is no
proposed rule language.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[Release No. 34–59999; File No. SR–BX–
2009–026]
1. Purpose
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Order Routing
May 28, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 21,
2009, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.
(‘‘NASDAQ OMX’’) acquired the
Exchange in August 2008. Prior to the
acquisition, the Exchange owned a
21.87% interest in Boston Options
Exchange Group, LLC (‘‘BOX LLC’’), the
operator of the Boston Options
Exchange facility (‘‘BOX’’). BOXR is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Exchange, to which the Exchange has
delegated, pursuant to a delegation plan,
certain self-regulatory responsibilities
related to the BOX.
At the closing of the acquisition by
NASDAQ OMX, the Exchange
transferred its interest in BOX LLC to
3 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Exchange Act Release No. 59721
(April 7, 2009), 74 FR 17245 (April 14, 2009) (SR–
Phlx–2009–32); Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 59779 (April 16, 2009), 74 FR 18600 (April 23,
2009) (SR–Phlx–2009–32, Amendment No. 1).
4 Securities
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26902-26903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12997]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-59987; File No. SR-FINRA-2009-016]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change as Amended,
Relating to the Adoption of FINRA Rule 2080 (Obtaining an Order of
Expungement of Customer Dispute Information From the Central
Registration Depository (CRD System)), FINRA Rule 2310 (Direct
Participation Programs), FINRA Rule 4551 (Requirements for Alternative
Trading Systems to Record and Transmit Order and Execution Information
for Security Futures) and FINRA Rule 2266 (SIPC Information) in the
Consolidated FINRA Rulebook
May 27, 2009.
I. Introduction
On March 25, 2009, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') (f/k/a National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(``NASD'')) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to (1) adopt NASD Rules 2130 (Obtaining an Order
of Expungement of Customer Dispute Information from the Central
Registration Depository (CRD System)), 2810 (Direct Participation
Programs) and 3115 (Requirements for Alternative Trading Systems to
Record and Transmit Order and Execution Information for Security
Futures) as FINRA rules in the consolidated FINRA rulebook without
material change; and (2) adopt NASD Rule 2342 (SIPC Information) in the
consolidated FINRA rulebook without material change and to delete NYSE
Rule 409A (SIPC Disclosures). The proposed rule change would renumber
NASD Rule 2130 as FINRA Rule 2080, NASD Rule 2810 as FINRA Rule 2310,
NASD Rule 3115 as FINRA Rule 4551 and NASD Rule 2342 as FINRA Rule 2266
in the consolidated FINRA rulebook. On April 14, 2009, FINRA filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed Rule Change.\3\ The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on April 15,
2009.\4\ The Commission received no comment letters on the proposed
rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the original filing.
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59771 (April 15,
2009), 74 FR 18411.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to adopt NASD Rule 2130 without material change
in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook as FINRA Rule 2080. NASD Rule 2130
addresses the expungement of customer dispute information from the
Central Registration Depository system.
FINRA is proposing to adopt NASD Rule 2810 without material change
in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook as FINRA Rule 2310. NASD Rule 2810
addresses underwriting terms and arrangements in public offerings of
direct participation programs and unlisted real estate investment
trusts.
FINRA is proposing to adopt NASD Rule 3115 without material change
in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook as FINRA Rule 4551. NASD Rule 3115
(Requirements for Alternative Trading Systems to Record and Transmit
Order and Execution Information for Security Futures) requires
alternative trading
[[Page 26903]]
systems (``ATSs'') \5\ that accept orders for security futures \6\ to
record and report to FINRA certain information regarding those orders,
including the date and time the order was received, the security future
product name and symbol, the details of the order, and the date and
time that the order was executed. The rule provides FINRA with an audit
trail of orders for security futures placed on an ATS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ATSs generally are registered broker-dealers that provide or
maintain a marketplace for bringing together purchasers and sellers
of securities or otherwise perform the functions commonly performed
by a securities exchange but do not perform self-regulatory
functions.
\6\ A security future is a contract of sale for future delivery
of a single security or of a narrow-based security index. Security
futures are defined as ``securities'' under the Act; consequently,
the federal securities laws are generally applicable to security
futures. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(10).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA is proposing to adopt NASD Rule 2342 without material change
in the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook as FINRA Rule 2266 and to delete
comparable Incorporated NYSE Rule 409A. NASD Rule 2342 and Incorporated
NYSE Rule 409A were adopted in response to a May 2001 report issued by
the Government Accountability Office (``GAO''), entitled ``Securities
Investor Protection: Steps Needed to Better Disclose SIPC Policies to
Investors.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See U.S. Government Accountability Office, ``Securities
Investor Protection: Steps Needed to Better Disclose SIPC Policies
to Investors,'' Publication GAO-01-653 (May 25, 2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
association.\8\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of
the Act,\9\ which requires, among other things, that FINRA rules be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that that transferring NASD Rule 2130 into
the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook will ensure that its standards and
procedures regarding expungement of customer dispute information from
the CRD continue to be reasonably designed to ensure that information
submitted to and maintained in the CRD is accurate and complete. The
Commission believes that transferring NASD Rule 2810 into the
Consolidated FINRA Rulebook will ensure that policies and procedures
regarding FINRA's members' participation in public offerings of
Investment Programs continue to meet statutory mandates. The Commission
believes that transferring NASD Rule 3115 into the Consolidated FINRA
Rulebook will continue to allow ATSs to provide trading facilities for
security futures while also ensuring that FINRA will receive sufficient
information to maintain an audit trail regarding the trading of
security futures on ATSs. Finally, the Commission believes that
transferring NASD Rule 2342 into the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook will
continue to ensure that SIPC information is provided to customers
effectively. The proposed rule change makes non-material changes to
rules that have proven effective in meeting the statutory mandates.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\10\ that the proposed rule change (SR-FINRA-2009-016), as amended,
be, and hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12997 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P