Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, 23465 [E9-11658]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 95 / Tuesday, May 19, 2009 / Notices government will afford reciprocity to U.S. carriers seeking authority for the similar fifth-, sixth- and seventhfreedom operations. Carriers may cite certifications submitted by carriers from the same homeland if that homeland issued such certification within the preceding six-month period. Approximately 100 carriers from roughly 30 distinct homelands use OST Form 4540 to apply for statements of authorization annually. We estimate that one foreign carrier from any given homeland will expend roughly 4 hours every six months to obtain certification from its homeland governments.3 We have apportioned 30 minutes to each application to account for the time required to obtain certifications from homeland governments. We have no empirical data to indicate how much time is required for a person to complete OST Form 4540; however, anecdotal evidence reveals that respondents spend thirty (30) minutes or less completing the form and brief justification. In some cases, respondents spend a limited amount of time, less than ten (10) minutes, reviewing the form before sending it via facsimile or email to the Department. In the interest of providing a conservative estimate so as to not understate the burden hours, we estimate the hour burden for completing OST Form 4540 as thirty (30) minutes. Issued in Washington, DC on May 11, 2009. Tracey M. Jackson, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. E9–11605 Filed 5–18–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [NHTSA–2009–0142] Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US DOT. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted 3 Calculation: (4 burden hours per application) x (30 foreign homelands) x (2 requests per year) = 240 annual burden hours. Apportioning 240 annual burden hours equally among an average of 430 applications annually = approximately 30 burden minutes per application. VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:48 May 18, 2009 Jkt 217001 below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of the information collections and their expected burden. The Federal Register Notice with the 60-day comment period was published on October 3, 2008. No comments were received in response. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 18, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurie Flaherty at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Emergency Medical Services (NTI–140), 202–366–2705, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: E–911 Grant Program. OMB Control Number: N/A. Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the approval date. Type of Request: New collection. Affected Public: State Governments. Form Number: N/A. Abstract: The Ensuring Needed Help Arrives Near Callers Employing 911 (ENHANCE 911) Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–494, codified at 47 U.S.C. 942) authorizes a joint grant program between the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of the U.S. Department of Transportation and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) of the Department of Commerce to facilitate coordination among all parties involved in the organization of enhanced 911 (E–911) services. The Act requires an applicant to certify to several conditions in its application in order to qualify for a grant. Specifically, an applicant must certify that (1) it has coordinated its application with the public safety answering points (PSAPs); (2) it has designated a single officer or governmental body to serve as the coordinator of implementation of E–911 services; (3) it has established a plan for the coordination of and implementation of E–911 services; (4) it has integrated telecommunications services involved in the implementation of E–911 services; and (5) no portion of any designated E–911 charges imposed by the State or other taxing jurisdiction within the State is being diverted for any other purpose during the period at least 180 days before the application date and continuing throughout the period of time for which grant funds are available. In addition, the Act requires grantees to match at least 50 percent from non-Federal sources. The information collected for this grant program is to include an PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 23465 application consisting of a State 911 Plan, project budget information and certifications. This information is necessary to determine whether a State satisfies the criteria for a grant award. The agencies intend to use SF–424, which is an approved OMB form, as part of the application for the E–911 grant program. Accordingly, the agencies are not required to obtain OMB approval for the use of that form. A State must also submit a State 911 Plan as part of its application. This plan must detail the projects and activities proposed to be funded for the implementation of Phase II E–911 services or migration to an IP-enabled emergency network, establish metrics and a timetable for grant implementation, and describe the steps that the State has taken to meet the grant criteria. It is important for the agencies to review each applicant’s plan to confirm that the applicant has met certain statutory requirements—a plan for the coordination of and implementation of E–911 services, coordination of its application with PSAPs, involvement of integrated telecommunications services in the implementation of E–911 services, and priority funding to communities without 911 capability. Estimated Total Annual Burden: 10,976. Estimated Number of Respondents: 56 (50 States, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands). ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th St., NW., Washington, DC 20503. Attention NHTSA Desk Officer. Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agencies, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the agencies’ estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Issued in Washington, DC, on May 14, 2009. Jeffrey P. Michael, Associate Administrator for Research and Program Development. [FR Doc. E9–11658 Filed 5–18–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM 19MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11658]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[NHTSA-2009-0142]


Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information 
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR 
describes the nature of the information collections and their expected 
burden. The Federal Register Notice with the 60-day comment period was 
published on October 3, 2008. No comments were received in response.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 18, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurie Flaherty at the National 
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Emergency Medical 
Services
    (NTI-140), 202-366-2705, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 
20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: E-911 Grant Program.
    OMB Control Number: N/A.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the 
approval date.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Affected Public: State Governments.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Abstract: The Ensuring Needed Help Arrives Near Callers Employing 
911 (ENHANCE 911) Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-494, codified at 47 U.S.C. 
942) authorizes a joint grant program between the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of the U.S. Department of 
Transportation and the National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration (NTIA) of the Department of Commerce to facilitate 
coordination among all parties involved in the organization of enhanced 
911 (E-911) services.
    The Act requires an applicant to certify to several conditions in 
its application in order to qualify for a grant. Specifically, an 
applicant must certify that (1) it has coordinated its application with 
the public safety answering points (PSAPs); (2) it has designated a 
single officer or governmental body to serve as the coordinator of 
implementation of E-911 services; (3) it has established a plan for the 
coordination of and implementation of E-911 services; (4) it has 
integrated telecommunications services involved in the implementation 
of E-911 services; and (5) no portion of any designated E-911 charges 
imposed by the State or other taxing jurisdiction within the State is 
being diverted for any other purpose during the period at least 180 
days before the application date and continuing throughout the period 
of time for which grant funds are available. In addition, the Act 
requires grantees to match at least 50 percent from non-Federal 
sources.
    The information collected for this grant program is to include an 
application consisting of a State 911 Plan, project budget information 
and certifications. This information is necessary to determine whether 
a State satisfies the criteria for a grant award. The agencies intend 
to use SF-424, which is an approved OMB form, as part of the 
application for the E-911 grant program. Accordingly, the agencies are 
not required to obtain OMB approval for the use of that form.
    A State must also submit a State 911 Plan as part of its 
application. This plan must detail the projects and activities proposed 
to be funded for the implementation of Phase II E-911 services or 
migration to an IP-enabled emergency network, establish metrics and a 
timetable for grant implementation, and describe the steps that the 
State has taken to meet the grant criteria. It is important for the 
agencies to review each applicant's plan to confirm that the applicant 
has met certain statutory requirements--a plan for the coordination of 
and implementation of E-911 services, coordination of its application 
with PSAPs, involvement of integrated telecommunications services in 
the implementation of E-911 services, and priority funding to 
communities without 911 capability.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 10,976.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 56 (50 States, District of 
Columbia, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana 
Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands).

ADDRESSES: Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information 
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th St., 
NW., Washington, DC 20503. Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agencies, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the agencies' estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 14, 2009.
Jeffrey P. Michael,
Associate Administrator for Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9-11658 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.