Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund Incorporated, et al.; Notice of Application, 22766-22769 [E9-11234]
Download as PDF
22766
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 92 / Thursday, May 14, 2009 / Notices
All other information in the original
declaration remains unchanged.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9–11285 Filed 5–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Extension of Existing
Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Extension:
Rule 17a–6; OMB Control No. 3235–0489;
SEC File No. 270–433.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Rule 17a–6 (17 CFR 240.17a–6) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78a et seq.) permits national
securities exchanges, national securities
associations, registered clearing
agencies, and the Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board (collectively,
‘‘SROs’’) to destroy or convert to
microfilm or other recording media
records maintained under Rule 17a–1, if
they have filed a record destruction plan
with the Commission and the
Commission has declared such plan
effective.
There are currently 27 SROs: 17
national securities exchanges, 1 national
securities association, and 9 registered
clearing agencies. Of the 27 SROs, 2
SRO respondents have filed a record
destruction plan with the Commission.
The staff calculates that the preparation
and filing of a new record destruction
plan should take 160 hours. Further,
any existing SRO record destruction
plans may require revision, over time, in
response to, for example, changes in
document retention technology, which
the Commission estimates will take
much less than the 160 hours estimated
for a new plan. Thus, the total annual
compliance burden is estimated to be 60
hours per year. The approximate cost
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:37 May 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
per hour is $305, resulting in a total cost
of compliance for these respondents of
$18,300 per year (30 hours @ $305 per
hour).
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Comments should be directed to
Charles Boucher, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way,
Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-mail
to PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: May 7, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–11170 Filed 5–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
28722; File No. 812–13598]
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income
Fund Incorporated, et al.; Notice of
Application
May 8, 2009.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
order under section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940
(‘‘Act’’) for an exemption from sections
18(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act.
APPLICANTS: Flaherty & Crumrine
Preferred Income Fund Incorporated
(‘‘PFD’’), Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred
Income Opportunity Fund Incorporated
(‘‘PFO’’), Flaherty & Crumrine/Claymore
Preferred Securities Income Fund
Incorporated (‘‘FFC’’), and Flaherty &
Crumrine/Claymore Total Return Fund
Incorporated (‘‘FLC’’) (each, a ‘‘Fund’’
and collectively, ‘‘Funds’’).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order (‘‘Order’’) granting an
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
exemption from sections 18(a)(1)(A) and
(B) of the Act for a period from the date
of the Order until October 31, 2010. The
Order would permit each Fund to issue
or incur debt that would be used to
redeem the Fund’s auction preferred
shares (‘‘APS Shares’’) issued prior to
February 1, 2008 that are outstanding at
the time of such issuance or incurrence
(‘‘post-Order debt’’), and to refinance
such post-Order debt, subject to the
200% asset coverage requirement
ordinarily applicable to a senior security
that is stock. The Order also would
permit each Fund to declare dividends
or any other distributions on, or
purchase, capital stock during the term
of the Order, provided that any such
post-Order debt has asset coverage of at
least 200% after deducting the amount
of such transaction.
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on November 4, 2008, and amended on
March 23, 2009 and April 23, 2009.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on May 29, 2009, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicants: Donald F. Crumrine,
Flaherty & Crumrine Incorporated, 301
E. Colorado Boulevard, Suite 720,
Pasadena, CA 91101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven I. Amchan, Attorney Adviser, at
(202) 551–6826, or Jennifer L. Sawin,
Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6821
(Division of Investment Management,
Office of Investment Company
Regulation).
The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
Web site by searching for the file
number, or an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 92 / Thursday, May 14, 2009 / Notices
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each of the Funds is organized as
a Maryland corporation. PFD, PFO, and
FLC are registered under the Act as
diversified, closed-end management
investment companies. FFC is registered
under the Act as a non-diversified,
closed-end management investment
company. Each Fund is advised by
Flaherty & Crumrine Incorporated
(‘‘Flaherty & Crumrine’’) and has issued
and outstanding a class of common
shares and a class of one or more series
of APS Shares.
2. Applicants state that the Funds
issued their APS Shares for purposes of
investment leverage to augment the
amount of investment capital available
for use in the pursuit of their investment
objectives. Applicants state that,
through the use of leverage, the Funds
seek to enhance the investment return
available to the holders of their common
shares by earning a rate of portfolio
return (which includes the return
related to investments made with
proceeds from leverage) that exceeds the
leverage costs. Applicants represent that
owners of APS Shares of FFC and FLC
are entitled to receive a stated
liquidation preference amount of
$25,000 per share (plus any
accumulated but unpaid dividends),
and owners of APS Shares of PFD and
PFO are entitled to receive a stated
liquidation preference amount of
$100,000 per share (plus any
accumulated but unpaid dividends), in
any liquidation, dissolution, or winding
up of the relevant Fund before any
distribution or payment to holders of
the Fund’s common shares. They state
that dividends declared and payable on
APS Shares have a similar priority over
dividends declared and payable on the
Fund’s common shares. In addition,
applicants state that APS Shares are
‘‘perpetual’’ securities and are not
subject to mandatory redemption by a
Fund so long as certain asset coverage
tests are met. Further, applicants state
that APS Shares are redeemable at each
Fund’s option.
3. Applicants state that prior to
February 2008, dividend rates on the
APS Shares for each dividend period
were set at the market clearing rate
determined through an auction process
that brought together bidders, who
sought to buy APS Shares, and holders
of APS Shares, who sought to sell their
APS Shares. Applicants represent that
each Fund’s Articles Supplementary
provide that if an auction fails to clear
(because of an imbalance of sell orders
over bids), the dividend payment rate
over the next dividend period is set at
a specified maximum applicable rate
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:37 May 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
(the ‘‘Maximum Rate’’) determined by
reference to a short-term market interest
rate (i.e., a commercial paper rate).
Applicants state that an unsuccessful
auction is not a default; the relevant
Fund continues to pay dividends to all
holders of APS Shares, but at the
specified Maximum Rate rather than a
market clearing rate. Applicants
represent that the Funds experienced no
unsuccessful auctions prior to February
2008.
4. Applicants state that if investors
did not purchase all of the APS Shares
tendered for sale at an auction prior to
the failure of the auction market, dealers
historically would enter into the auction
and purchase any excess shares to
prevent the auction from failing.
Applicants represent that this auction
mechanism had generally provided
readily available liquidity to holders of
APS Shares for more than twenty years.
Applicants state that they understand
that many investors may have invested
short-term cash balances in APS Shares
believing they were safe short-term
investments and, in many cases, the
equivalent of cash.
5. Applicants state that in February
2008, the financial institutions that
historically provided ‘‘back stop’’
liquidity to APS Shares auctions
stopped participating in them and the
auctions began to fail. Applicants
further state that, beginning in February
2008, the Funds experienced auction
failures due to an imbalance between
buy and sell orders. Applicants believe
that there is no established secondary
market that would provide holders of
the Funds’ APS Shares with the
liquidation preference of $25,000 or
$100,000, as the case may be, per share.
As described more fully in the
application, Applicants state that they
believe they have redeemed as much of
the Funds’ APS Shares as appropriate
and feasible. Applicants state, however,
that none of the Funds would be able to
replace its APS Shares entirely with
new debt without the requested Order
providing temporary relief from the
300% asset coverage test. As a result,
applicants state that there is currently
no reliable mechanism for holders of
their APS Shares to obtain liquidity, and
believe that the current lack of liquidity
is causing distress and creating severe
hardship for holders of their APS
Shares.
6. Applicants seek relief for a
temporary period from the date on
which the Order is granted until
October 31, 2010 (‘‘Exemption Period’’).
The proposed replacement of the Funds’
APS Shares with debt would provide
liquidity for holders of the Funds’ APS
Shares, while Applicants continue their
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22767
diligent efforts to obtain a more
permanent form of financing, such as a
new type of senior security that is
equity.1 Applicants submit that the
gradual reduction of leverage through
the use of proceeds of any common
share issuances or the development of
an alternative form of preferred stock
might take several months, if at all, after
the Order has been issued. Applicants
state that it is uncertain when, or if, the
securities and capital markets will
return to conditions that would enable
the Funds to achieve compliance with
the asset coverage requirements that
would apply in the absence of the
Order. Given the uncertainty and the
current and continuing unsettled state
of the securities and capital markets,
applicants believe that the Exemption
Period is reasonable and appropriate.
Each Fund’s incurrence of debt to
redeem its APS Shares would be subject
to approval by the Fund’s board of
directors (‘‘Board’’).
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the Act
provides that it is unlawful for any
registered closed-end investment
company to issue any class of senior
security representing indebtedness, or to
sell such security of which it is the
issuer, unless the class of senior security
will have an asset coverage of at least
300% immediately after issuance or
sale. Section 18(a)(2)(A) of the Act
provides that it is unlawful for any
registered closed-end investment
company to issue any class of senior
security that is a stock, or to sell any
such security of which it is the issuer,
unless the class of senior security will
have an asset coverage of at least 200%
immediately after such issuance or
sale.2
2. Section 18(a)(1)(B) prohibits a
closed-end fund from declaring a
dividend or other distribution on, or
purchasing, its own capital stock unless
its outstanding indebtedness will have
an asset coverage of at least 300%
1 See, e.g., Eaton Vance Management, SEC NoAction Letter (June 13, 2008) (permitting the
issuance of ‘‘liquidity protected preferred shares’’ to
supplement or replace Eaton Vance funds’ auction
rate preferred stock).
2 Section 18(h) of the Act defines asset coverage
of a senior security representing indebtedness of an
issuer as the ratio which the value of the total assets
of the issuer, less all liabilities and indebtedness
not represented by senior securities, bears to the
aggregate amount of senior securities representing
indebtedness of the issuer. The section defines asset
coverage of the preferred stock of an issuer as the
ratio which the value of the total assets of the
issuer, less all liabilities and indebtedness not
represented by senior securities, bears to the
aggregate amount of senior securities representing
indebtedness of the issuer plus the aggregate
amount the class of senior security would be
entitled to on involuntary liquidation.
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
22768
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 92 / Thursday, May 14, 2009 / Notices
immediately after deducting the amount
of such dividend, distribution or
purchase price.3 Section 18(a)(2)(B)
prohibits a closed-end fund from
declaring a dividend or other
distribution on, or purchasing, its own
common stock unless its outstanding
preferred stock will have an asset
coverage of at least 200% immediately
after deducting the amount of such
dividend, distribution or purchase
price.
3. Section 6(c) of the Act provides, in
relevant part, that the Commission, by
order upon application, may
conditionally or unconditionally
exempt any person, security, or
transaction from any provision of the
Act if and to the extent necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act.
4. Applicants request that the
Commission issue an Order under
section 6(c) of the Act to exempt each
Fund from the 300% asset coverage
requirements set forth in sections
18(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act.
Specifically, applicants seek relief to
permit each Fund, for the Exemption
Period, to issue or incur post-Order debt
for the purpose of redeeming all or a
portion of its APS Shares that were
issued prior to February 1, 2008 and
that are outstanding at the time of such
issuance or incurrence, as well as any
refinancing of such debt until the
expiration of the Exemption Period,
subject to asset coverage of 200%
ordinarily applicable to a senior security
that is stock, rather than the asset
coverage of 300% ordinarily applicable
to a senior security constituting
indebtedness. Applicants also seek
relief to permit each Fund to declare
dividends or any other distributions on,
or purchase, capital stock during the
Exemption Period, provided that any
such post-Order debt has asset coverage
of at least 200% after deducting the
amount of such transaction. Applicants
state that, except as permitted under the
requested Order, if issued, the Funds
would meet all of the asset coverage
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
3 An
exception is made for the declaration of a
dividend on a class of preferred stock if the senior
security representing indebtedness has an asset
coverage of at least 200% at the time of declaration
after deduction of the amount of such dividend. See
section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Further, section 18(g)
of the Act provides, among other things, that
‘‘senior security,’’ for purposes of section
18(a)(1)(B), does not include any promissory note
or other evidence of indebtedness issued in
consideration of any loan, extension or renewal
thereof, made by a bank or other person and
privately arranged, and not intended to be publicly
distributed.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:37 May 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
requirements of section 18(a) of the Act.
In addition, applicants state that within
the Exemption Period each Fund that
borrows in reliance on the Order will
either pay down or refinance the postOrder debt so that the Fund would, then
and thereafter, have asset coverage of at
least 300% for each class of senior
security representing indebtedness to
the extent required by the Act.
5. Applicants state that section 18
reflects congressional concerns
regarding preferential treatment for
certain classes of shareholders, complex
capital structures, and the use of
excessive leverage. Applicants submit
that another concern was that senior
securities gave the misleading
impression of safety from risk.
Applicants believe that the request for
temporary relief is necessary,
appropriate and in the public interest
and that such relief is consistent with
the protection of investors and the
purposes intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
6. Applicants note that the illiquidity
of APS Shares is a unique, exigent
situation that is posing severe hardships
on APS Shares shareholders. Applicants
represent that the proposed replacement
of the APS Shares with debt would
provide liquidity for the Funds’ APS
Shares shareholders while the Funds
continue their efforts to obtain a more
permanent form of financing (such as
through the issuance of preferred
equity-based instruments) that fully
complies with the asset coverage
requirements of section 18.4
7. Applicants represent that the Order
would help avoid the potential harm to
common shareholders that could result
if the Funds were to deleverage their
portfolios in the current difficult market
environment 5 or that could result if a
reduction in investment return reduced
the market price of common shares.
Applicants also state that the requested
Order would permit the Funds to
continue to provide their common
shareholders with the enhanced returns
that leverage may provide.
8. Applicants believe that the interests
of both classes of the Funds’ current
investors would be well served by the
requested order—the APS Shares
shareholders because they would
4 See
supra note 1.
state that each Fund’s portfolio
consists primarily of preferred securities.
Applicants further state that Flaherty & Crumrine
concluded that preferred securities were
significantly undervalued and traded at historically
wide spreads to benchmark fixed-income asset
classes. Applicants state they believe that further
deleveraging in the current market environment
would not be a reasonable method to provide
liquidity to their remaining APS Shares
shareholders.
5 Applicants
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
achieve the liquidity that the market
currently cannot provide (as well as full
recovery of the liquidation value of their
shares), and the common shareholders
because the adverse consequences of
forced deleveraging would be avoided
and each Fund’s investment return
would be enhanced to the extent that
the cost of the new form of leverage is
lower than the cost of continuing to pay
the Maximum Rate on outstanding APS
Shares.
9. Applicants represent that the
proposed borrowing would be obtained
from banks, insurance companies or
qualified institutional buyers (as
defined in Rule 144(a)(1) under the
Securities Act of 1933) who would be
capable of assessing the risk associated
with the transaction. Applicants also
state that, to the extent the Act’s asset
coverage requirements were aimed at
limiting leverage because of its potential
to magnify losses as well as gains, they
believe that the proposal would not
unduly increase the speculative nature
of the Funds’ common shares because
the relief is temporary and the Funds
would be no more highly leveraged if
they replace the existing APS Shares
with borrowing.6 Applicants also state
that the proposed liquidity solution
actually could simplify the Funds’
capital structures, and would not make
them more complex, opaque, or hard to
understand or result in pyramiding or
inequitable distribution of control.
10. Applicants state that the current
state of the credit markets, which has
affected the APS Shares, is an historic
event of unusual severity, which
requires a creative and flexible response
on the part of both the public and
private sectors. Applicants believe that
these issues have created an urgent need
for limited, quick, thoughtful and
responsive solutions. Applicants believe
that the request meets the standards for
exemption under section 6(c) of the Act.
Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief shall be
subject to the following conditions:
1. Each Fund that borrows subject to
200% asset coverage under the order
6 Applicants acknowledge that managing any
portfolio that relies on borrowing for leverage
entails the risk that, when the borrowing matures
and must be repaid or refinanced, an economically
attractive form of replacement leverage may not be
available in the capital markets. For that reason, any
portfolio that relies on borrowing for leverage is
subject to the risk that it may have to forcibly
deleverage, which could be disadvantageous to the
portfolio’s common shareholders. Applicants
therefore state that they regard leveraging through
borrowing as potentially a temporary, interim step,
with the issuance of new preferred equity-based
instruments as a possible longer-term replacement
source of portfolio leverage.
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 92 / Thursday, May 14, 2009 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
will do so only if such Fund’s Board,
including a majority of the directors
who are not ‘‘interested persons’’ (as
defined in section 2(a)(19) of the Act)
(‘‘Independent Directors’’), shall have
determined that such borrowing is in
the best interests of such Fund, its
common shareholders, and its APS
Shares shareholders. Each Fund shall
make and preserve for a period of not
less than six years from the date of such
determination, the first two years in an
easily accessible place, minutes
specifically describing the deliberations
by the Board and the information and
documents supporting those
deliberations, the factors considered by
the Board in connection with such
determination, and the basis of such
determination.
2. Upon expiration of the Exemption
Period, each Fund will have asset
coverage of at least 300% for each class
of senior security representing
indebtedness.
3. The Board of any Fund that has
borrowed in reliance on the order shall
receive and review, no less frequently
than quarterly during the Exemption
Period, detailed progress reports
prepared by management (or other
parties selected by the Independent
Directors) regarding and assessing the
efforts that the Fund has undertaken,
and the progress that the Fund has
made, towards achieving compliance
with the appropriate asset coverage
requirements under section 18 by the
expiration of the Exemption Period. The
Board, including a majority of the
Independent Directors, will make such
adjustments as it deems necessary or
appropriate to ensure that the applicant
comes into compliance with section 18
of the Act within a reasonable period of
time, not to exceed the expiration of the
Exemption Period. Each Fund will make
and preserve minutes describing these
reports and the Board’s review,
including copies of such reports and all
other information provided to or relied
upon by the Board, for a period of not
less than six years, the first two years in
an easily accessible place.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–11234 Filed 5–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:37 May 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IC–28721; File No. 812–13594]
Cohen & Steers Advantage Income
Realty Fund, et al.; Notice of
Application
May 8, 2009.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
order under section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940
(‘‘Act’’) for an exemption from sections
18(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act.
Applicants: Cohen & Steers
Advantage Income Realty Fund, Inc.,
Cohen & Steers Global Income Builder,
Inc., Cohen & Steers Premium Income
Realty Fund, Cohen & Steers Quality
Income Realty Fund, Inc., Cohen &
Steers REIT and Preferred Income Fund,
Inc., Cohen & Steers REIT and Utility
Income Fund, Inc., Cohen & Steers
Select Utility Fund, Inc. and Cohen &
Steers Worldwide Realty Income Fund,
Inc. (each, a ‘‘Fund’’ and collectively,
‘‘Funds’’).
SUMMARY: Summary of Application:
Applicants request an order (‘‘Order’’)
granting an exemption from sections
18(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act for a
period from the date of the Order until
October 31, 2010. The Order would
permit each Fund to issue or incur debt
subject to asset coverage of 200% that
would be used to refinance the Fund’s
auction preferred shares (‘‘APS Shares’’)
issued prior to February 1, 2008 that are
outstanding at the time such post-Order
debt is issued or incurred. The Order
also would permit each Fund to declare
dividends or any other distributions on,
or purchase, capital stock during the
term of the Order, provided that any
such debt has asset coverage of at least
200% after deducting the amount of
such transaction.
DATES: Filing Dates: The application was
filed on October 27, 2008, and amended
on March 26, 2009 and May 7, 2009.
Applicants have agreed to file an
amendment during the notice period,
the substance of which is reflected in
this notice.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on May 29, 2009, and
should be accompanied by proof of
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22769
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, the
reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request
notification by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicants: c/o Francis C. Poli, Esq.,
Cohen & Steers Capital Management,
280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean
E. Minarick, Senior Counsel, at (202)
551–6811, or Julia Kim Gilmer, Branch
Chief, at (202) 551–6821 (Division of
Investment Management, Office of
Investment Company Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
Web site by searching for the file
number, or an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
Applicants’ Representations
1. Each of the Funds is organized as
a Maryland corporation and is a nondiversified, closed-end management
investment company registered under
the Act. Each Fund is advised by Cohen
& Steers Capital Management, Inc. and
has issued and outstanding a class of
common shares and a class of one or
more series of APS Shares.
2. Applicants state that the Funds
issued their outstanding APS Shares for
purposes of investment leverage to
augment the amount of investment
capital available for use in the pursuit
of their investment objectives.
Applicants state that, through the use of
leverage, the Funds seek to enhance the
investment return available to the
holders of their common shares by
earning a rate of return from securities
that are purchased from the proceeds of
APS Share offerings that exceeds the
dividend rate that the applicants pay to
holders of the APS Shares. Applicants
represent that APS shareholders are
entitled to receive a stated liquidation
preference amount of $25,000 per share
(plus any accumulated but unpaid
dividends) in any liquidation,
dissolution, or winding up of the
relevant Fund before any distribution or
payment to holders of the Fund’s
common shares. Applicants also state
that dividends declared and payable on
APS Shares have a similar priority over
dividends declared and payable on the
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22766-22769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11234]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 28722; File No. 812-13598]
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund Incorporated, et al.;
Notice of Application
May 8, 2009.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an order under section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from sections
18(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Fund Incorporated
(``PFD''), Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred Income Opportunity Fund
Incorporated (``PFO''), Flaherty & Crumrine/Claymore Preferred
Securities Income Fund Incorporated (``FFC''), and Flaherty & Crumrine/
Claymore Total Return Fund Incorporated (``FLC'') (each, a ``Fund'' and
collectively, ``Funds'').
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order (``Order'')
granting an exemption from sections 18(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the Act for
a period from the date of the Order until October 31, 2010. The Order
would permit each Fund to issue or incur debt that would be used to
redeem the Fund's auction preferred shares (``APS Shares'') issued
prior to February 1, 2008 that are outstanding at the time of such
issuance or incurrence (``post-Order debt''), and to refinance such
post-Order debt, subject to the 200% asset coverage requirement
ordinarily applicable to a senior security that is stock. The Order
also would permit each Fund to declare dividends or any other
distributions on, or purchase, capital stock during the term of the
Order, provided that any such post-Order debt has asset coverage of at
least 200% after deducting the amount of such transaction.
Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 4, 2008, and
amended on March 23, 2009 and April 23, 2009.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the application
will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested
persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's Secretary
and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by
mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on May 29, 2009, and should be accompanied by proof of service on
applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's
interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons
who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission's Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants: Donald F. Crumrine,
Flaherty & Crumrine Incorporated, 301 E. Colorado Boulevard, Suite 720,
Pasadena, CA 91101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven I. Amchan, Attorney Adviser, at
(202) 551-6826, or Jennifer L. Sawin, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6821
(Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company
Regulation).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or an applicant
using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or
by calling (202) 551-8090.
[[Page 22767]]
Applicants' Representations
1. Each of the Funds is organized as a Maryland corporation. PFD,
PFO, and FLC are registered under the Act as diversified, closed-end
management investment companies. FFC is registered under the Act as a
non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. Each Fund is
advised by Flaherty & Crumrine Incorporated (``Flaherty & Crumrine'')
and has issued and outstanding a class of common shares and a class of
one or more series of APS Shares.
2. Applicants state that the Funds issued their APS Shares for
purposes of investment leverage to augment the amount of investment
capital available for use in the pursuit of their investment
objectives. Applicants state that, through the use of leverage, the
Funds seek to enhance the investment return available to the holders of
their common shares by earning a rate of portfolio return (which
includes the return related to investments made with proceeds from
leverage) that exceeds the leverage costs. Applicants represent that
owners of APS Shares of FFC and FLC are entitled to receive a stated
liquidation preference amount of $25,000 per share (plus any
accumulated but unpaid dividends), and owners of APS Shares of PFD and
PFO are entitled to receive a stated liquidation preference amount of
$100,000 per share (plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends), in any
liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the relevant Fund before any
distribution or payment to holders of the Fund's common shares. They
state that dividends declared and payable on APS Shares have a similar
priority over dividends declared and payable on the Fund's common
shares. In addition, applicants state that APS Shares are ``perpetual''
securities and are not subject to mandatory redemption by a Fund so
long as certain asset coverage tests are met. Further, applicants state
that APS Shares are redeemable at each Fund's option.
3. Applicants state that prior to February 2008, dividend rates on
the APS Shares for each dividend period were set at the market clearing
rate determined through an auction process that brought together
bidders, who sought to buy APS Shares, and holders of APS Shares, who
sought to sell their APS Shares. Applicants represent that each Fund's
Articles Supplementary provide that if an auction fails to clear
(because of an imbalance of sell orders over bids), the dividend
payment rate over the next dividend period is set at a specified
maximum applicable rate (the ``Maximum Rate'') determined by reference
to a short-term market interest rate (i.e., a commercial paper rate).
Applicants state that an unsuccessful auction is not a default; the
relevant Fund continues to pay dividends to all holders of APS Shares,
but at the specified Maximum Rate rather than a market clearing rate.
Applicants represent that the Funds experienced no unsuccessful
auctions prior to February 2008.
4. Applicants state that if investors did not purchase all of the
APS Shares tendered for sale at an auction prior to the failure of the
auction market, dealers historically would enter into the auction and
purchase any excess shares to prevent the auction from failing.
Applicants represent that this auction mechanism had generally provided
readily available liquidity to holders of APS Shares for more than
twenty years. Applicants state that they understand that many investors
may have invested short-term cash balances in APS Shares believing they
were safe short-term investments and, in many cases, the equivalent of
cash.
5. Applicants state that in February 2008, the financial
institutions that historically provided ``back stop'' liquidity to APS
Shares auctions stopped participating in them and the auctions began to
fail. Applicants further state that, beginning in February 2008, the
Funds experienced auction failures due to an imbalance between buy and
sell orders. Applicants believe that there is no established secondary
market that would provide holders of the Funds' APS Shares with the
liquidation preference of $25,000 or $100,000, as the case may be, per
share. As described more fully in the application, Applicants state
that they believe they have redeemed as much of the Funds' APS Shares
as appropriate and feasible. Applicants state, however, that none of
the Funds would be able to replace its APS Shares entirely with new
debt without the requested Order providing temporary relief from the
300% asset coverage test. As a result, applicants state that there is
currently no reliable mechanism for holders of their APS Shares to
obtain liquidity, and believe that the current lack of liquidity is
causing distress and creating severe hardship for holders of their APS
Shares.
6. Applicants seek relief for a temporary period from the date on
which the Order is granted until October 31, 2010 (``Exemption
Period''). The proposed replacement of the Funds' APS Shares with debt
would provide liquidity for holders of the Funds' APS Shares, while
Applicants continue their diligent efforts to obtain a more permanent
form of financing, such as a new type of senior security that is
equity.\1\ Applicants submit that the gradual reduction of leverage
through the use of proceeds of any common share issuances or the
development of an alternative form of preferred stock might take
several months, if at all, after the Order has been issued. Applicants
state that it is uncertain when, or if, the securities and capital
markets will return to conditions that would enable the Funds to
achieve compliance with the asset coverage requirements that would
apply in the absence of the Order. Given the uncertainty and the
current and continuing unsettled state of the securities and capital
markets, applicants believe that the Exemption Period is reasonable and
appropriate. Each Fund's incurrence of debt to redeem its APS Shares
would be subject to approval by the Fund's board of directors
(``Board'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See, e.g., Eaton Vance Management, SEC No-Action Letter
(June 13, 2008) (permitting the issuance of ``liquidity protected
preferred shares'' to supplement or replace Eaton Vance funds'
auction rate preferred stock).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 18(a)(1)(A) of the Act provides that it is unlawful for
any registered closed-end investment company to issue any class of
senior security representing indebtedness, or to sell such security of
which it is the issuer, unless the class of senior security will have
an asset coverage of at least 300% immediately after issuance or sale.
Section 18(a)(2)(A) of the Act provides that it is unlawful for any
registered closed-end investment company to issue any class of senior
security that is a stock, or to sell any such security of which it is
the issuer, unless the class of senior security will have an asset
coverage of at least 200% immediately after such issuance or sale.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Section 18(h) of the Act defines asset coverage of a senior
security representing indebtedness of an issuer as the ratio which
the value of the total assets of the issuer, less all liabilities
and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, bears to the
aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness of
the issuer. The section defines asset coverage of the preferred
stock of an issuer as the ratio which the value of the total assets
of the issuer, less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented
by senior securities, bears to the aggregate amount of senior
securities representing indebtedness of the issuer plus the
aggregate amount the class of senior security would be entitled to
on involuntary liquidation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Section 18(a)(1)(B) prohibits a closed-end fund from declaring a
dividend or other distribution on, or purchasing, its own capital stock
unless its outstanding indebtedness will have an asset coverage of at
least 300%
[[Page 22768]]
immediately after deducting the amount of such dividend, distribution
or purchase price.\3\ Section 18(a)(2)(B) prohibits a closed-end fund
from declaring a dividend or other distribution on, or purchasing, its
own common stock unless its outstanding preferred stock will have an
asset coverage of at least 200% immediately after deducting the amount
of such dividend, distribution or purchase price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ An exception is made for the declaration of a dividend on a
class of preferred stock if the senior security representing
indebtedness has an asset coverage of at least 200% at the time of
declaration after deduction of the amount of such dividend. See
section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Act. Further, section 18(g) of the Act
provides, among other things, that ``senior security,'' for purposes
of section 18(a)(1)(B), does not include any promissory note or
other evidence of indebtedness issued in consideration of any loan,
extension or renewal thereof, made by a bank or other person and
privately arranged, and not intended to be publicly distributed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Section 6(c) of the Act provides, in relevant part, that the
Commission, by order upon application, may conditionally or
unconditionally exempt any person, security, or transaction from any
provision of the Act if and to the extent necessary or appropriate in
the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and
the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
4. Applicants request that the Commission issue an Order under
section 6(c) of the Act to exempt each Fund from the 300% asset
coverage requirements set forth in sections 18(a)(1)(A) and (B) of the
Act. Specifically, applicants seek relief to permit each Fund, for the
Exemption Period, to issue or incur post-Order debt for the purpose of
redeeming all or a portion of its APS Shares that were issued prior to
February 1, 2008 and that are outstanding at the time of such issuance
or incurrence, as well as any refinancing of such debt until the
expiration of the Exemption Period, subject to asset coverage of 200%
ordinarily applicable to a senior security that is stock, rather than
the asset coverage of 300% ordinarily applicable to a senior security
constituting indebtedness. Applicants also seek relief to permit each
Fund to declare dividends or any other distributions on, or purchase,
capital stock during the Exemption Period, provided that any such post-
Order debt has asset coverage of at least 200% after deducting the
amount of such transaction. Applicants state that, except as permitted
under the requested Order, if issued, the Funds would meet all of the
asset coverage requirements of section 18(a) of the Act. In addition,
applicants state that within the Exemption Period each Fund that
borrows in reliance on the Order will either pay down or refinance the
post-Order debt so that the Fund would, then and thereafter, have asset
coverage of at least 300% for each class of senior security
representing indebtedness to the extent required by the Act.
5. Applicants state that section 18 reflects congressional concerns
regarding preferential treatment for certain classes of shareholders,
complex capital structures, and the use of excessive leverage.
Applicants submit that another concern was that senior securities gave
the misleading impression of safety from risk. Applicants believe that
the request for temporary relief is necessary, appropriate and in the
public interest and that such relief is consistent with the protection
of investors and the purposes intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act.
6. Applicants note that the illiquidity of APS Shares is a unique,
exigent situation that is posing severe hardships on APS Shares
shareholders. Applicants represent that the proposed replacement of the
APS Shares with debt would provide liquidity for the Funds' APS Shares
shareholders while the Funds continue their efforts to obtain a more
permanent form of financing (such as through the issuance of preferred
equity-based instruments) that fully complies with the asset coverage
requirements of section 18.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See supra note 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Applicants represent that the Order would help avoid the
potential harm to common shareholders that could result if the Funds
were to deleverage their portfolios in the current difficult market
environment \5\ or that could result if a reduction in investment
return reduced the market price of common shares. Applicants also state
that the requested Order would permit the Funds to continue to provide
their common shareholders with the enhanced returns that leverage may
provide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Applicants state that each Fund's portfolio consists
primarily of preferred securities. Applicants further state that
Flaherty & Crumrine concluded that preferred securities were
significantly undervalued and traded at historically wide spreads to
benchmark fixed-income asset classes. Applicants state they believe
that further deleveraging in the current market environment would
not be a reasonable method to provide liquidity to their remaining
APS Shares shareholders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Applicants believe that the interests of both classes of the
Funds' current investors would be well served by the requested order--
the APS Shares shareholders because they would achieve the liquidity
that the market currently cannot provide (as well as full recovery of
the liquidation value of their shares), and the common shareholders
because the adverse consequences of forced deleveraging would be
avoided and each Fund's investment return would be enhanced to the
extent that the cost of the new form of leverage is lower than the cost
of continuing to pay the Maximum Rate on outstanding APS Shares.
9. Applicants represent that the proposed borrowing would be
obtained from banks, insurance companies or qualified institutional
buyers (as defined in Rule 144(a)(1) under the Securities Act of 1933)
who would be capable of assessing the risk associated with the
transaction. Applicants also state that, to the extent the Act's asset
coverage requirements were aimed at limiting leverage because of its
potential to magnify losses as well as gains, they believe that the
proposal would not unduly increase the speculative nature of the Funds'
common shares because the relief is temporary and the Funds would be no
more highly leveraged if they replace the existing APS Shares with
borrowing.\6\ Applicants also state that the proposed liquidity
solution actually could simplify the Funds' capital structures, and
would not make them more complex, opaque, or hard to understand or
result in pyramiding or inequitable distribution of control.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Applicants acknowledge that managing any portfolio that
relies on borrowing for leverage entails the risk that, when the
borrowing matures and must be repaid or refinanced, an economically
attractive form of replacement leverage may not be available in the
capital markets. For that reason, any portfolio that relies on
borrowing for leverage is subject to the risk that it may have to
forcibly deleverage, which could be disadvantageous to the
portfolio's common shareholders. Applicants therefore state that
they regard leveraging through borrowing as potentially a temporary,
interim step, with the issuance of new preferred equity-based
instruments as a possible longer-term replacement source of
portfolio leverage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Applicants state that the current state of the credit markets,
which has affected the APS Shares, is an historic event of unusual
severity, which requires a creative and flexible response on the part
of both the public and private sectors. Applicants believe that these
issues have created an urgent need for limited, quick, thoughtful and
responsive solutions. Applicants believe that the request meets the
standards for exemption under section 6(c) of the Act.
Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief shall
be subject to the following conditions:
1. Each Fund that borrows subject to 200% asset coverage under the
order
[[Page 22769]]
will do so only if such Fund's Board, including a majority of the
directors who are not ``interested persons'' (as defined in section
2(a)(19) of the Act) (``Independent Directors''), shall have determined
that such borrowing is in the best interests of such Fund, its common
shareholders, and its APS Shares shareholders. Each Fund shall make and
preserve for a period of not less than six years from the date of such
determination, the first two years in an easily accessible place,
minutes specifically describing the deliberations by the Board and the
information and documents supporting those deliberations, the factors
considered by the Board in connection with such determination, and the
basis of such determination.
2. Upon expiration of the Exemption Period, each Fund will have
asset coverage of at least 300% for each class of senior security
representing indebtedness.
3. The Board of any Fund that has borrowed in reliance on the order
shall receive and review, no less frequently than quarterly during the
Exemption Period, detailed progress reports prepared by management (or
other parties selected by the Independent Directors) regarding and
assessing the efforts that the Fund has undertaken, and the progress
that the Fund has made, towards achieving compliance with the
appropriate asset coverage requirements under section 18 by the
expiration of the Exemption Period. The Board, including a majority of
the Independent Directors, will make such adjustments as it deems
necessary or appropriate to ensure that the applicant comes into
compliance with section 18 of the Act within a reasonable period of
time, not to exceed the expiration of the Exemption Period. Each Fund
will make and preserve minutes describing these reports and the Board's
review, including copies of such reports and all other information
provided to or relied upon by the Board, for a period of not less than
six years, the first two years in an easily accessible place.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11234 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P