In the Matter of: Certain Lighting Control Devices Including Dimmer Switches and Parts Thereof; Notice of Investigation, 21820-21821 [E9-10928]
Download as PDF
21820
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 89 / Monday, May 11, 2009 / Notices
MICHIGAN
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Oakland County,
McCoy, Kittie C., House, 1455 Benstein Rd.,
Commerce, 08001105, LISTED, 3/25/09
NEW YORK
Allegany County,
Centerville Town Hall, Fairview Rd.,
Centerville, 09000154, LISTED, 3/25/09
Livingston County,
Engleside, 9086 McNair Rd., Dansville
vicinity, 09000156, LISTED, 3/23/09
NEW YORK
Orange County,
Echo Lawn Estate, River Rd. at Stone Gate
Dr., Balmville vicinity, 09000157, LISTED,
3/23/09
NEW YORK
Orange County,
Milliken-Smith Farm, 279 Bailey Rd.,
Montgomery vicinity, 09000158, LISTED,
3/25/09
NORTH CAROLINA
Cleveland County,
Double Shoals Cotton Mill, 199 Old Mill Rd.,
Double Shoals vicinity, 08000775, LISTED,
3/24/09
Belmont County,
Friends Boarding School and Ohio Yearly
Meetinghouse Historic District, 61830
Sandy Ridge Rd., Barnesville vicinity,
09000168, LISTED, 3/25/09
VIRGINIA
Charlottesville Independent City,
Oakhurst-Gildersleeve Neighborhood
Historic District, Oakhurst Circle,
Gildersleeve Wood, Valley Rd., Valley
Circle, and part of Maywood Ln., and
Jefferson Park Ave., Charlottesville,
09000161, LISTED,
3/25/09
VIRGINIA
Pittsylvania County,
Yeatts, John and Nancy, House, VA 795,
Chatham vicinity, 09000173, LISTED,
3/25/09
VIRGINIA
Rockingham County,
Bogota, 5375 Lynnwood Rd., Port Republic
vicinity, 09000162, LISTED, 3/24/09
WISCONSIN
Vilas County,
Jabodon, 1460 Everett Rd., Washington,
09000164, LISTED, 3/25/09
[FR Doc. E9–10802 Filed 5–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 May 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
[Inv. No. 337–TA–676]
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2009).
In the Matter of: Certain Lighting
Control Devices Including Dimmer
Switches and Parts Thereof; Notice of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
NEW YORK
OHIO
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2781.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
April 7, 2009, under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Lutron
Electronics Co., Inc. of Coopersburg,
Pennsylvania. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain lighting control devices
including dimmer switches and parts
thereof that infringe certain claims of
U.S. Patent Nos. 5,637,930 and
5,248,919 and U.S. Trademark
Registration No. 3,061,804. The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin Levi, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
May 4, 2009, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain lighting control devices
including dimmer switches or parts
thereof that infringe one or more of
claims 36, 38–41, 47, 53, 54, 56, 58, 60,
65, 67–70, 76, 82, 83, 85, 87, 89, 94, 96–
99, 105, 111, 112, 114, 116, 118, 178,
180, 189, and 197 of U.S. Patent No.
5,637,930 or claims 1, 2, 5–8, 11–13, 15–
20, 23, 25–32, 35, 36, and 38 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,248,919, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337; and
(b) Whether there is a violation of
subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain lighting control devices
including dimmer switches or parts
thereof by reason of infringement of U.S.
Trademark Registration No. 3,061,804,
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337; and
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is—Lutron
Electronics Co., Inc., 7200 Suter Road,
Coopersburg, PA 18036.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Universal Smart Electric Corp., 17795
Sky Park Circle, Suite H, Irvine, CA
92614.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Benjamin Levi, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 89 / Monday, May 11, 2009 / Notices
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 5, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–10928 Filed 5–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–407 and 731–
TA–902, 904, 905 (Review) (Remand)]
Hot-Rolled Steel Products From
Kazakhstan, Romania, and South
Africa
AGENCY: United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings.
SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby
gives notice of the court-ordered remand
of its five-year review determinations in
the countervailing duty and
antidumping Investigation Nos. 701–
TA–407 and 731–TA–902, 904, 905
concerning hot-rolled steel products
from Kazakhstan, Romania, and South
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:05 May 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
Africa. For further information
concerning the conduct of this
proceeding and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR
part 207).
DATES: May 4, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer, Office of Investigations,
telephone 202–205–3193, or Robin L.
Turner, Office of General Counsel,
telephone 202–205–3103, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record of the
underlying reviews (Investigation Nos.
701–TA–404–408 and 731–TA–898–902
and 904–908 (Review)) may be viewed
on the Commission’s electronic docket
(‘‘EDIS’’) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—In October 2007, the
Commission determined that revocation
of the countervailing duty order on hotrolled steel products from South Africa,
and that revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on hot-rolled steel products
from Kazakhstan, Romania, and South
Africa, would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time. The Commission’s determinations
were appealed to the Court of
International Trade (‘‘CIT’’ or ‘‘Court’’).
On March 9, 2009, the Court issued a
decision remanding the matter to the
Commission for further proceedings.
Nucor Corp. v. United States, Slip Op.
09–16 (Ct. Int’l Trade, March 9, 2009).
In its opinion, the Court affirmed the
Commission’s cumulation analysis, but
found that the Commission’s
conclusions concerning likely subject
import volume, likely price effects, and
likely impact were unsupported by
substantial evidence. The Court
instructed the Commission on remand
to address six issues. In particular, it
instructed the Commission to: (1) Reevaluate its finding that the
ArcelorMittal companies and/or Mittal
USA would limit subject imports from
the Mittal Companies; (2) reassess and
further explain the basis for its findings
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21821
that significant imports in any region of
the country are likely to have a
disruptive impact on the overall U.S.
market; (3) reassess and further explain
the behavior of ArcelorMittal and its
predecessor, the Ispat organization, with
respect to their business practices in
exporting to countries in which they
maintain production facilities; (4)
reassess and further explain certain
evidence the Court perceived contrary
to the Commission’s conclusion on
likely subject import volume; (5)
reassess likely price effects in
accordance with its revised volume
determination and; (6) reassess its likely
impact analysis in accordance with its
revised volume and price effects
determinations, and to explain the poor
performance of the domestic industry in
the latter portion of the period of
review.
Participation in the proceeding.—
Only those persons who were interested
parties to the original reviews (i.e.,
persons listed on the Commission
Secretary’s service list) and were parties
to the appeal may participate as parties
in the remand proceeding as of right.
Such persons need not re-file their
appearance notices or protective order
applications to participate in the
remand proceeding. The Commission
will consider permitting Mittal USA to
participate as a party in the remand if
it files a notice of appearance with the
Commission by May 11. Business
proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) referred
to during the remand proceeding will be
governed, as appropriate, by the
administrative protective order issued
in the original reviews.
Written submissions.—The
Commission is reopening the record to
obtain additional information pertinent
to the issues on which the Court has
directed a remand. The Commission
seeks additional information regarding
the operations of ArcelorMittal, its
affiliates including Mittal USA, and its
predecessor companies including Ispat
and Ispat Inland (collectively ‘‘Mittal’’).
Specifically, the Commission seeks
information concerning—
(a) Mittal’s policies and practices with
respect to,
(b) Mittal’s evaluation of the
economic incentives of, and
(c) The possible market disruption of,
shipping hot-rolled steel products
produced by one Mittal company to the
market in which another Mittal
company is located, including the
European Union and the United States.
The specific questions are posted on the
ITC’s Internet site at https://
www.usitc.gov/trade_remedy/
731_ad_701_cvd/investigations/
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21820-21821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10928]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-676]
In the Matter of: Certain Lighting Control Devices Including
Dimmer Switches and Parts Thereof; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on April 7, 2009, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. of Coopersburg, Pennsylvania. The
complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of certain lighting control devices
including dimmer switches and parts thereof that infringe certain
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,637,930 and 5,248,919 and U.S. Trademark
Registration No. 3,061,804. The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order
and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin Levi, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone
(202) 205-2781.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2009).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on May 4, 2009, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine:
(a) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section
337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of
certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches or parts
thereof that infringe one or more of claims 36, 38-41, 47, 53, 54, 56,
58, 60, 65, 67-70, 76, 82, 83, 85, 87, 89, 94, 96-99, 105, 111, 112,
114, 116, 118, 178, 180, 189, and 197 of U.S. Patent No. 5,637,930 or
claims 1, 2, 5-8, 11-13, 15-20, 23, 25-32, 35, 36, and 38 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,248,919, and whether an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; and
(b) Whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(C) of section
337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of
certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches or parts
thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Trademark Registration No.
3,061,804, and whether an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; and
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is--Lutron Electronics Co., Inc., 7200 Suter
Road, Coopersburg, PA 18036.
(b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is
to be served: Universal Smart Electric Corp., 17795 Sky Park Circle,
Suite H, Irvine, CA 92614.
(c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this
investigation, is Benjamin Levi, Esq., Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
[[Page 21821]]
(3) For the investigation so instituted, Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 5, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-10928 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P