Certain Activated Carbon From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review, 19934-19935 [E9-9998]

Download as PDF 19934 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 82 / Thursday, April 30, 2009 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A–570–904 Certain Activated Carbon From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) has received information sufficient to warrant initiation of a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). Based upon a request filed by Hebei Foreign Trade and Advertising Corporation (‘‘Hebei Foreign’’), the Department is initiating a changed circumstances review to determine whether Hebei Shenglun Advertising and Exhibit Corporation (‘‘Hebei Shenglun’’) is the successor–in-interest to Hebei Foreign, a separate–rate respondent in the original investigation and first administrative review. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 30, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–7906. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 27, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register an antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from the PRC. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of China, 72 FR 20988 (April 27, 2007) (‘‘PRC Carbon Order’’). As part of the antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from the PRC, Hebei Foreign received a separate rate of 67.14 percent. Id. at 20989. On February 24, 2009, Hebei Foreign filed a submission requesting that the Department conduct a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from the PRC to confirm that Hebei Shenglun is the successor–in-interest to Hebei Foreign.1 1 See Letter from Garvey Schubert Barer, to the Department, regarding Certain Activated Carbon from the People’s Republic of China; Request for Changed Circumstances Review (Case No. A-570904) (February 24, 2009) (‘‘Hebei Foreign’s CCR Request’’). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:35 Apr 29, 2009 Jkt 217001 In its submission, Hebei Foreign provided information on the events leading to the creation of Hebei Shenglun and the transfer of assets from Hebei Foreign to Hebei Shenglun. Hebei Foreign also provided documentation relating to the agreement between Hebei Foreign and Hebei Shenglun to transfer assets. In addition, Hebei Foreign provided narrative explanation and some limited documentation relating to the ownership structure and management, organizational structure, customer base, supplier relationships and locations of both Hebei Foreign and Hebei Shenglun. As part of its February 24, 2009, submission, Hebei Foreign requested that the Department conduct an expedited review.2 Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this order is certain activated carbon. Certain activated carbon is a powdered, granular, or pelletized carbon product obtained by ‘‘activating’’ with heat and steam various materials containing carbon, including but not limited to coal (including bituminous, lignite, and anthracite), wood, coconut shells, olive stones, and peat. The thermal and steam treatments remove organic materials and create an internal pore structure in the carbon material. The producer can also use carbon dioxide gas (CO2) in place of steam in this process. The vast majority of the internal porosity developed during the high temperature steam (or CO2 gas) activated process is a direct result of oxidation of a portion of the solid carbon atoms in the raw material, converting them into a gaseous form of carbon. The scope of this order covers all forms of activated carbon that are activated by steam or CO2, regardless of the raw material, grade, mixture, additives, further washing or post– activation chemical treatment (chemical or water washing, chemical impregnation or other treatment), or product form. Unless specifically excluded, the scope of this order covers all physical forms of certain activated carbon, including powdered activated carbon (‘‘PAC’’), granular activated carbon (‘‘GAC’’), and pelletized activated carbon. Excluded from the scope of the order are chemically activated carbons. The carbon–based raw material used in the chemical activation process is treated with a strong chemical agent, including but not limited to phosphoric acid, zinc 2 Hebei Foreign filed a request for changed circumstances on November 7, 2008. The Department rejected that request because it did not contain sufficient evidence to initiate a changed circumstances review. PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 chloride sulfuric acid or potassium hydroxide, that dehydrates molecules in the raw material, and results in the formation of water that is removed from the raw material by moderate heat treatment. The activated carbon created by chemical activation has internal porosity developed primarily due to the action of the chemical dehydration agent. Chemically activated carbons are typically used to activate raw materials with a lignocellulosic component such as cellulose, including wood, sawdust, paper mill waste and peat. To the extent that an imported activated carbon product is a blend of steam and chemically activated carbons, products containing 50 percent or more steam (or CO2 gas) activated carbons are within this scope, and those containing more than 50 percent chemically activated carbons are outside this scope. This exclusion language regarding blended material applies only to mixtures of steam and chemically activated carbons. Also excluded from the scope are reactivated carbons. Reactivated carbons are previously used activated carbons that have had adsorbed materials removed from their pore structure after use through the application of heat, steam and/or chemicals. Also excluded from the scope is activated carbon cloth. Activated carbon cloth is a woven textile fabric made of or containing activated carbon fibers. It is used in masks and filters and clothing of various types where a woven format is required. Any activated carbon meeting the physical description of subject merchandise provided above that is not expressly excluded from the scope is included within this scope. The products subject to the order are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheading 3802.10.00. Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from an interested party for a review of, an antidumping duty order, which shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. Additionally, section 751(b)(4) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(c) state that the Department shall not conduct a review E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM 30APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 82 / Thursday, April 30, 2009 / Notices less than 24 months after the date of publication of the determination, in the absence of good cause. As noted above, Hebei Foreign filed its request for a changed circumstances review on February 24, 2009, over 36 months after the publication of the amended final determination and order. See PRC Carbon Order. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department has determined that the information submitted by Hebei Foreign constitutes sufficient evidence to conduct a change circumstances review. In a changed circumstances review involving a successor–in-interest determination, the Department typically examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in: (1) management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer base. See Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Romania: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 22847 (May 3, 2005). While no single factor or combination of factors will necessarily be dispositive, the Department generally will consider the new company to be the successor to the predecessor if the resulting operations are essentially the same as those of the predecessor company. See, e.g., Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India, 71 FR 327 (January 4, 2006). Thus, if the record demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as the predecessor company, the Department may assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its predecessor. See, e.g., Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 64 FR 9979, 9980 (March 1, 1999). Based on the information provided in its submission, Hebei Foreign has provided sufficient evidence to warrant a review to determine if Hebei Shenglun is the successor–in-interest to Hebei Foreign. Therefore, pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(d), we are initiating a changed circumstances review. Although Hebei Foreign submitted documentation related to the transfer of assets to Hebei Shenglun and some limited information and documentation regarding the four factors that the Department considers in its successor–in-interest analysis, it did not provide complete supporting documentation or conclusive evidence VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:35 Apr 29, 2009 Jkt 217001 for the four elements listed above. Accordingly, the Department has determined that it would be inappropriate to expedite this action by combining the preliminary results of review with this notice of initiation. See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). Thus, the Department is not issuing the preliminary results of its antidumping duty changed circumstances review at this time. See, e.g., Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Pasta From Turkey, 74 FR 681 (January 7, 2009). The Department will issue questionnaires requesting additional information for the review and will publish in the Federal Register a notice of the preliminary results of the antidumping duty changed circumstances review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(2) and (4), and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(i). That notice will set forth the factual and legal conclusions upon which our preliminary results are based and a description of any action proposed. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will have an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results of review. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e), the Department will issue the final results of its antidumping duty changed circumstances review not later than 270 days after the date on which the review is initiated. During the course of this antidumping duty changed circumstances review, we will not change the cash deposit requirements for the merchandise subject to review. The cash deposit will only be altered, if warranted, pursuant to the final results of this review. This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216. Dated: April 21, 2009. John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. E9–9998 Filed 4–29–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board (Docket 17–2009) Foreign-Trade Zone 75—Phoenix, Arizona, Application for Expansion An application has been submitted to the Foreign–Trade Zones Board (the Board) by the City of Phoenix, Arizona, grantee of FTZ 75, requesting authority PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19935 to expand the zone project within the Phoenix Customs and Border Protection port of entry. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign–Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed on April 23, 2009. FTZ 75 was approved on March 25, 1982 (Board Order 185, 47 FR 14931, 4/ 7/82) and expanded on July 2, 1993 (Board Order 647, 58 FR 37907, 7/14/93) and on February 27, 2008 (Board Order 1545, 73 FR 13531, 3/13/08). The zone project consists of four sites (448 acres total) in Phoenix: Site 1 (338 acres) -within the 550–acre Phoenix Sky Harbor Center and Sky Harbor International Airport’s air cargo terminal located at Papago Freeway (Interstate 10) and Buckeye Road; Site 2 (18 acres) -- within the central southwestern portion of the CC&F South Valley Industrial Center located near the intersection of 7th Street and Victory Street; Site 3 (74 acres) -- Riverside Industrial Center located at 4747 West Buckeye Road; and, Site 4 (18 acres) -- Santa Fe Business Park located between 47th Avenue and 45th Avenue. The applicant is now requesting authority to expand the general–purpose zone to include the jet fuel storage and distribution system at and adjacent to the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, Arizona (Proposed Site 5). The system (32.5 acres total) includes the off–airport terminal (7 tanks, 7.5 acres), airport terminal (5 tanks, 3.5 acres), subsurface pipeline (14.5 acres) and airport hydrant fueling system (7 acres). These facilities consist primarily of storage tanks, pipelines, pumps, valves, filters, meters and related equipment. The system is operated by Airport Fueling Facilities Corporation which is a consortium of airlines that service the airport. No specific manufacturing authority is being requested at this time. Such requests would be made to the Board on a case–by-case basis. In accordance with the Board’s regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ staff is designated examiner to investigate the application and report to the Board. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is [June 29, 2009]. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15–day period to [July 14, 2009]. E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM 30APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19934-19935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9998]



[[Page 19934]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A-570-904


Certain Activated Carbon From the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') has received 
information sufficient to warrant initiation of a changed circumstances 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from 
the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). Based upon a request filed by 
Hebei Foreign Trade and Advertising Corporation (``Hebei Foreign''), 
the Department is initiating a changed circumstances review to 
determine whether Hebei Shenglun Advertising and Exhibit Corporation 
(``Hebei Shenglun'') is the successor-in-interest to Hebei Foreign, a 
separate-rate respondent in the original investigation and first 
administrative review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 30, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Marksberry, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-7906.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 27, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register 
an antidumping duty order on certain activated carbon from the PRC. See 
Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Activated Carbon from the 
People's Republic of China, 72 FR 20988 (April 27, 2007) (``PRC Carbon 
Order''). As part of the antidumping duty order on certain activated 
carbon from the PRC, Hebei Foreign received a separate rate of 67.14 
percent. Id. at 20989. On February 24, 2009, Hebei Foreign filed a 
submission requesting that the Department conduct a changed 
circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on certain activated 
carbon from the PRC to confirm that Hebei Shenglun is the successor-in-
interest to Hebei Foreign.\1\ In its submission, Hebei Foreign provided 
information on the events leading to the creation of Hebei Shenglun and 
the transfer of assets from Hebei Foreign to Hebei Shenglun. Hebei 
Foreign also provided documentation relating to the agreement between 
Hebei Foreign and Hebei Shenglun to transfer assets. In addition, Hebei 
Foreign provided narrative explanation and some limited documentation 
relating to the ownership structure and management, organizational 
structure, customer base, supplier relationships and locations of both 
Hebei Foreign and Hebei Shenglun. As part of its February 24, 2009, 
submission, Hebei Foreign requested that the Department conduct an 
expedited review.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Letter from Garvey Schubert Barer, to the Department, 
regarding Certain Activated Carbon from the People's Republic of 
China; Request for Changed Circumstances Review (Case No. A-570-904) 
(February 24, 2009) (``Hebei Foreign's CCR Request'').
    \2\ Hebei Foreign filed a request for changed circumstances on 
November 7, 2008. The Department rejected that request because it 
did not contain sufficient evidence to initiate a changed 
circumstances review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to this order is certain activated carbon. 
Certain activated carbon is a powdered, granular, or pelletized carbon 
product obtained by ``activating'' with heat and steam various 
materials containing carbon, including but not limited to coal 
(including bituminous, lignite, and anthracite), wood, coconut shells, 
olive stones, and peat. The thermal and steam treatments remove organic 
materials and create an internal pore structure in the carbon material. 
The producer can also use carbon dioxide gas (CO2) in place 
of steam in this process. The vast majority of the internal porosity 
developed during the high temperature steam (or CO2 gas) 
activated process is a direct result of oxidation of a portion of the 
solid carbon atoms in the raw material, converting them into a gaseous 
form of carbon.
    The scope of this order covers all forms of activated carbon that 
are activated by steam or CO2, regardless of the raw 
material, grade, mixture, additives, further washing or post-activation 
chemical treatment (chemical or water washing, chemical impregnation or 
other treatment), or product form. Unless specifically excluded, the 
scope of this order covers all physical forms of certain activated 
carbon, including powdered activated carbon (``PAC''), granular 
activated carbon (``GAC''), and pelletized activated carbon.
    Excluded from the scope of the order are chemically activated 
carbons. The carbon-based raw material used in the chemical activation 
process is treated with a strong chemical agent, including but not 
limited to phosphoric acid, zinc chloride sulfuric acid or potassium 
hydroxide, that dehydrates molecules in the raw material, and results 
in the formation of water that is removed from the raw material by 
moderate heat treatment. The activated carbon created by chemical 
activation has internal porosity developed primarily due to the action 
of the chemical dehydration agent. Chemically activated carbons are 
typically used to activate raw materials with a lignocellulosic 
component such as cellulose, including wood, sawdust, paper mill waste 
and peat.
    To the extent that an imported activated carbon product is a blend 
of steam and chemically activated carbons, products containing 50 
percent or more steam (or CO2 gas) activated carbons are 
within this scope, and those containing more than 50 percent chemically 
activated carbons are outside this scope. This exclusion language 
regarding blended material applies only to mixtures of steam and 
chemically activated carbons.
    Also excluded from the scope are reactivated carbons. Reactivated 
carbons are previously used activated carbons that have had adsorbed 
materials removed from their pore structure after use through the 
application of heat, steam and/or chemicals.
    Also excluded from the scope is activated carbon cloth. Activated 
carbon cloth is a woven textile fabric made of or containing activated 
carbon fibers. It is used in masks and filters and clothing of various 
types where a woven format is required.
    Any activated carbon meeting the physical description of subject 
merchandise provided above that is not expressly excluded from the 
scope is included within this scope. The products subject to the order 
are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (``HTSUS'') subheading 3802.10.00. Although the HTSUS 
subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.

Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review

    Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(``Act''), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review 
upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from an interested 
party for a review of, an antidumping duty order, which shows changed 
circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. 
Additionally, section 751(b)(4) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216(c) state 
that the Department shall not conduct a review

[[Page 19935]]

less than 24 months after the date of publication of the determination, 
in the absence of good cause. As noted above, Hebei Foreign filed its 
request for a changed circumstances review on February 24, 2009, over 
36 months after the publication of the amended final determination and 
order. See PRC Carbon Order.
    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department has determined 
that the information submitted by Hebei Foreign constitutes sufficient 
evidence to conduct a change circumstances review. In a changed 
circumstances review involving a successor-in-interest determination, 
the Department typically examines several factors including, but not 
limited to, changes in: (1) management; (2) production facilities; (3) 
supplier relationships; and (4) customer base. See Certain Cut-to-
Length Carbon Steel Plate from Romania: Initiation and Preliminary 
Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 70 FR 22847 (May 3, 2005). While no single factor or 
combination of factors will necessarily be dispositive, the Department 
generally will consider the new company to be the successor to the 
predecessor if the resulting operations are essentially the same as 
those of the predecessor company. See, e.g., Notice of Initiation of 
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Forged Stainless 
Steel Flanges from India, 71 FR 327 (January 4, 2006). Thus, if the 
record demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of 
the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business 
entity as the predecessor company, the Department may assign the new 
company the cash deposit rate of its predecessor. See, e.g., Fresh and 
Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway: Final Results of Changed 
Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 64 FR 9979, 9980 
(March 1, 1999).
    Based on the information provided in its submission, Hebei Foreign 
has provided sufficient evidence to warrant a review to determine if 
Hebei Shenglun is the successor-in-interest to Hebei Foreign. 
Therefore, pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.216(d), we are initiating a changed circumstances review. Although 
Hebei Foreign submitted documentation related to the transfer of assets 
to Hebei Shenglun and some limited information and documentation 
regarding the four factors that the Department considers in its 
successor-in-interest analysis, it did not provide complete supporting 
documentation or conclusive evidence for the four elements listed 
above. Accordingly, the Department has determined that it would be 
inappropriate to expedite this action by combining the preliminary 
results of review with this notice of initiation. See 19 CFR 
351.221(c)(3)(ii). Thus, the Department is not issuing the preliminary 
results of its antidumping duty changed circumstances review at this 
time. See, e.g., Notice of Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 
Circumstances Review: Certain Pasta From Turkey, 74 FR 681 (January 7, 
2009).
    The Department will issue questionnaires requesting additional 
information for the review and will publish in the Federal Register a 
notice of the preliminary results of the antidumping duty changed 
circumstances review, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(2) and (4), 
and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(i). That notice will set forth the factual and 
legal conclusions upon which our preliminary results are based and a 
description of any action proposed. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(4)(ii), interested parties will have an opportunity to 
comment on the preliminary results of review. In accordance with 19 CFR 
351.216(e), the Department will issue the final results of its 
antidumping duty changed circumstances review not later than 270 days 
after the date on which the review is initiated.
    During the course of this antidumping duty changed circumstances 
review, we will not change the cash deposit requirements for the 
merchandise subject to review. The cash deposit will only be altered, 
if warranted, pursuant to the final results of this review.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216.

    Dated: April 21, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-9998 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.