Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Germany: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to a Court Decision, 19045-19046 [E9-9524]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
During any administrative review
covering all or part of a period falling
between the first and second or third
and fourth anniversary of the
publication of an antidumping duty
order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a
determination under 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or
suspended investigation (after sunset
review), the Secretary, if requested by a
domestic interested party within 30
days of the date of publication of the
notice of initiation of the review, will
determine, consistent with FAG Italia v.
United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed. Cir.
2002), as appropriate, whether
antidumping duties have been absorbed
by an exporter or producer subject to the
review if the subject merchandise is
sold in the United States through an
importer that is affiliated with such
exporter or producer. The request must
include the name(s) of the exporter or
producer for which the inquiry is
requested.
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective orders in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, the Department
published Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures;
APO Procedures (73 FR 3634). Those
procedures apply to administrative
reviews included in this notice of
initiation. Parties wishing to participate
in any of these administrative reviews
should ensure that they meet the
requirements of these procedures (e.g.,
the filing of separate letters of
appearance as discussed at 19 CFR
351.103(d)).
These initiations and this notice are
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1765(a)), and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i).
3 If the above-named company does not qualify
for a separate rate, all other exporters of Certain
Preserved Mushrooms from the People’s Republic
of China who have not qualified for a separate rate
are deemed to be covered by this review as part of
the single PRC entity of which the named exporters
are a part. Also, this case was inadvertently omitted
from the initiation notice that published on March
24, 2009 (74 FR 12310).
4 If one of the above-named companies does not
qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of
Certain Tissue Paper Products from the People’s
Republic of China who have not qualified for a
separate rate are deemed to be covered by this
review as part of the single PRC entity of which the
named exporters are a part.
5 If one of the above-named companies does not
qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of
Glycine from the People’s Republic of China who
have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to
be covered by this review as part of the single PRC
entity of which the named exporters are a part.
6 If one of the above-named companies does not
qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:55 Apr 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
Dated: April 21, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–9587 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–428–801]
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From
Germany: Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review Pursuant to a Court Decision
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 29, 2007, the United
States Court of International Trade (CIT)
affirmed the redetermination of the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) on voluntary remand of the
final results of the administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on ball
bearings and parts thereof from
¨
Germany. See Paul Muller Industrie
GmbH & Co. v. United States, 502 F.
Supp. 2d 1271 (CIT 2007). The
Department is amending the final
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on ball
bearings and parts thereof from
Germany covering the period of review
May 1, 2002, through April 30, 2003, to
reflect the CIT’s order.
DATES: Effective Date: April 27, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5760 or (202) 482–
4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 15, 2004, the
Department published the final results
of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on ball bearings
and parts thereof from Germany for the
period May 1, 2002, through April 30,
2003. See Antifriction Bearings and
Parts Thereof From France, et al.: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews, Rescission of
Sodium Hexametaphosphate from the People’s
Republic of China who have not qualified for a
separate rate are deemed to be covered by this
review as part of the single PRC entity of which the
named exporters are a part.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19045
Administrative Reviews in Part, and
Determination To Revoke Order in Part,
69 FR 55574 (September 15, 2004)
(Final Results). The Final Results were
amended in Ball Bearings and Parts
Thereof From Germany; Amended Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 69 FR 63507
(November 2, 2004) (Amended Final
Results).
¨
Paul Muller Industrie GmbH & Co.
¨
(Paul Muller) and Timken US
Corporation1 filed lawsuits challenging
the Final Results as amended by the
Amended Final Results. The
Department requested a voluntary
remand on two issues. On May 26, 2006,
the CIT granted the Department’s
request and ordered the Department to
correct a ministerial error involving a
billing adjustment reported by Paul
¨
Muller for one home–market
transaction, and to recalculate its
antidumping margin accordingly, and
¨
explain its treatment of Paul Muller’s
inventory carrying costs. See Paul
¨
Muller Industrie GmbH & Co. v. United
States, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1241, 1246–47
¨
(CIT 2006) (Paul Muller 2006)
In accordance with the CIT’s remand
¨
order in Paul Muller 2006, the
Department filed its redetermination on
remand of the final results (remand
results) on September 13, 2006. In its
remand results, the Department
corrected the ministerial error and made
a change to its treatment of the
inventory carrying costs to ensure that
home–market and U.S. inventory
carrying costs were calculated on a
consistent basis. On June 29, 2007, the
CIT affirmed the Department’s remand
¨
results. See Paul Muller Industrie GmbH
& Co. v. United States, 502 F. Supp. 2d
1271 (CIT 2007).
Amended Final Results of the Review
Based on the remand results, we are
amending the weighted–average margin
¨
for Paul Muller for the period May 1,
2002, through April 30, 2003, from 0.44
percent to 0.46 percent.
Assessment of Duties
The Department has determined, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by these
amended final results.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
1 Timken US Corporation is currently known as
the Timken Company.
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
19046
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Notices
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO as explained in
the APO itself. See 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
amended final results of administrative
review in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended.
Dated: April 21, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–9524 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–601]
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
Thereof, Finished or Unfinished, From
the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of the 2007–2008
Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: April 27, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frances Veith or Brendan Quinn, AD/
CVD Operations, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–4295 or (202) 482–
5848, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 30, 2008, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated
the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on tapered
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:28 Apr 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
roller bearings and parts thereof,
finished or unfinished (‘‘TRBs’’), from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
for the period June 1, 2007 through May
31, 2008. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, Request for Revocation in Part,
and Deferral of Administrative Review,
73 FR 44220 (July 30, 2008). On
February 19, 2009, the Department
published a notice in the Federal
Register extending the time limit for the
preliminary results of review by 90
days, until June 1, 2009. See Tapered
Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof,
Finished or Unfinished, from the
People’s Republic of China: Extension of
Time Limit for the Preliminary Results
of the 2007–2008 Administrative Review
of the Antidumping Duty Order, 74 FR
7661 (February 19, 2009).
Statutory Time Limits
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to make a
preliminary determination in an
administrative review within 245 days
after the last day of the anniversary
month of an order for which a review
is requested and a final determination
within 120 days after the date on which
the preliminary results are published.
However, if it is not practicable to
complete the review within these time
periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act
allows the Department to extend the
time limit for the preliminary
determination to a maximum of 365
days after the last day of the anniversary
month.
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary
Results
We determine that it is not practicable
to complete the preliminary results of
this review within the current extended
time limit because the Department
requires additional time to analyze the
supplemental questionnaire responses
and issue additional supplemental
questionnaires, if necessary. Therefore,
the Department is extending the time
limit for completion of the preliminary
results by an additional 30 days. Thus,
the preliminary results of this review
are being fully extended by 120 days
from the original deadline of March 2,
2009, which results in a new deadline
of June 30, 2009. The final results
continue to be due 120 days after the
publication of the preliminary results.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: April 21, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–9562 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–836]
Certain Cut–to-Length Carbon–Quality
Steel Plate Products From the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 19, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
cut–to-length carbon–quality steel plate
products (steel plate) from the Republic
of Korea (Korea). The period of review
is February 1, 2007, through January 31,
2008. We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results. Based on our
analysis of the comments received and
an examination of our calculations, we
have made changes for the final results.
The final weighted–average dumping
margin is listed below in the ‘‘Final
Results of the Review’’ section of this
notice.
Effective Date: April 27, 2009.
Lyn
Johnson or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: (202) 482–5287 and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On December 19, 2008, the
Department published Certain Cut–toLength Carbon–Quality Steel Plate
Products From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
77614 (December 19, 2008) (Preliminary
Results), in the Federal Register. The
administrative review covers one
producer of the subject merchandise,
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM).
We invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. We received case
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19045-19046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9524]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-428-801]
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Germany: Amended Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Pursuant to a Court
Decision
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 29, 2007, the United States Court of International
Trade (CIT) affirmed the redetermination of the Department of Commerce
(the Department) on voluntary remand of the final results of the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on ball bearings
and parts thereof from Germany. See Paul M[uuml]ller Industrie GmbH &
Co. v. United States, 502 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (CIT 2007). The Department
is amending the final results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on ball bearings and parts thereof from Germany
covering the period of review May 1, 2002, through April 30, 2003, to
reflect the CIT's order.
DATES: Effective Date: April 27, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5760 or (202) 482-4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 15, 2004, the Department published the final results
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on ball
bearings and parts thereof from Germany for the period May 1, 2002,
through April 30, 2003. See Antifriction Bearings and Parts Thereof
From France, et al.: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews, Rescission of Administrative Reviews in Part, and
Determination To Revoke Order in Part, 69 FR 55574 (September 15, 2004)
(Final Results). The Final Results were amended in Ball Bearings and
Parts Thereof From Germany; Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 69 FR 63507 (November 2, 2004) (Amended Final
Results).
Paul M[uuml]ller Industrie GmbH & Co. (Paul M[uuml]ller) and Timken
US Corporation\1\ filed lawsuits challenging the Final Results as
amended by the Amended Final Results. The Department requested a
voluntary remand on two issues. On May 26, 2006, the CIT granted the
Department's request and ordered the Department to correct a
ministerial error involving a billing adjustment reported by Paul
M[uuml]ller for one home-market transaction, and to recalculate its
antidumping margin accordingly, and explain its treatment of Paul
M[uuml]ller's inventory carrying costs. See Paul M[uuml]ller Industrie
GmbH & Co. v. United States, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1241, 1246-47 (CIT 2006)
(Paul M[uuml]ller 2006)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Timken US Corporation is currently known as the Timken
Company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with the CIT's remand order in Paul M[uuml]ller 2006,
the Department filed its redetermination on remand of the final results
(remand results) on September 13, 2006. In its remand results, the
Department corrected the ministerial error and made a change to its
treatment of the inventory carrying costs to ensure that home-market
and U.S. inventory carrying costs were calculated on a consistent
basis. On June 29, 2007, the CIT affirmed the Department's remand
results. See Paul M[uuml]ller Industrie GmbH & Co. v. United States,
502 F. Supp. 2d 1271 (CIT 2007).
Amended Final Results of the Review
Based on the remand results, we are amending the weighted-average
margin for Paul M[uuml]ller for the period May 1, 2002, through April
30, 2003, from 0.44 percent to 0.46 percent.
Assessment of Duties
The Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by these amended final results.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to
[[Page 19046]]
liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure
to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO as explained in the APO itself. See 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these amended final results of
administrative review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: April 21, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9524 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
