Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend its Rules Prohibiting Members From Functioning as Market Makers, 16246-16247 [E9-8002]
Download as PDF
16246
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 67 / Thursday, April 9, 2009 / Notices
floating monthly rates for the month of
April 2009.
The Exchange believes that the
process used to set the proposed
Temporary Member access fee and the
proposed Temporary Member access fee
itself are appropriate for the same
reasons set forth in CBOE rule filing SR–
CBOE–2008–12 with respect to the
original Temporary Member access fee.6
Similarly, the Exchange believes that
the process used to set the proposed ITP
access fee and the proposed ITP access
fee itself are appropriate for the same
reasons set forth in CBOE rule filing SR–
CBOE–2008–77 with respect to the
original ITP access fee.7
Each of the proposed access fees will
remain in effect until such time either
that the Exchange submits a further rule
filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Act 8 to modify the applicable
access fee or the applicable status (i.e.,
the Temporary Membership status or
the ITP status) is terminated.
Accordingly, the Exchange may, and
likely will, further adjust the proposed
access fees in the future if the Exchange
determines that it would be appropriate
to do so taking into consideration lease
rates for transferable CBOE
memberships prevailing at that time.
The procedural provisions of the
CBOE Fee Schedule related to the
assessment of each proposed access fee
are not proposed to be changed and will
remain the same as the current
procedural provisions relating to the
assessment of that access fee.
2. Statutory Basis
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,9 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,10 in particular, in that it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among persons using its
facilities.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57293
(February 8, 2008), 73 FR 8729 (February 14, 2008)
(SR–CBOE–2008–12), which established the
original Temporary Member access fee, for detail
regarding the rationale in support of the original
Temporary Member access fee and the process used
to set that fee, which is also applicable to this
proposed change to the Temporary Member access
fee as well.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58200
(July 21, 2008), 73 FR 43805 (July 28, 2008) (SR–
CBOE–2008–77), which established the original ITP
access fee, for detail regarding the rationale in
support of the original ITP access fee and the
process used to set that fee, which is also applicable
to this proposed change to the ITP access fee as
well.
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:28 Apr 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule change
establishes or changes a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the Exchange,
it has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 12
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2009–023 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2009–023. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–CBOE–2009–023 and should be
submitted on or before April 30, 2009.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–8000 Filed 4–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–59700; File No. SR–CBOE–
2009–009]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend its
Rules Prohibiting Members From
Functioning as Market Makers
April 2, 2009.
I. Introduction
On February 18, 2009, the Chicago
Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(‘‘CBOE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
revise CBOE Rule 6.8C to eliminate
certain restrictions prohibiting members
13 17
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 67 / Thursday, April 9, 2009 / Notices
from functioning as market makers. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
February 26, 2009.3 The Commission
received no comments on the proposal.
This order approves the proposal.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.8C, Prohibition Against Members
Functioning as Market Makers, to
eliminate certain of its restrictions. Rule
6.8C currently provides that a member,
acting either as principal or agent, may
neither enter nor permit the entry of
orders into the Exchange’s electronic
order routing system if (i) the orders are
limit orders for the account or accounts
of the same beneficial owner(s); and (ii)
the limit orders are entered in such a
manner that the beneficial owner(s)
effectively is operating as a market
maker by holding itself out as willing to
buy and sell such securities on a regular
or continuous basis. The Exchange
proposes that these restrictions be
amended to apply only to customer
orders (i.e., non-broker-dealer orders)
that are not Voluntary Professional
orders.4 The restrictions would no
longer be applicable to instances where
a member is acting as principal on its
own behalf or is acting as agent on
behalf of other broker-dealer orders or
Voluntary Professional orders. The
Exchange noted that it is retaining the
restriction for customers who are not
Voluntary Professionals because such
customers have priority at any price
over the bids and offers of market
makers, other broker-dealers, and
Voluntary Professionals.
In addition, in those instances where
its restrictions are applicable, Rule 6.8C
currently provides that, in determining
whether a beneficial owner effectively is
operating as a market maker, the
Exchange will consider, among other
things, the simultaneous or near
simultaneous entry of limit orders to
buy and sell the same security, the entry
of multiple limit orders at different
prices in the same security, and the
multiple acquisition and liquidation of
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59425
(February 19, 2009), 74 FR 8829.
4 The term ‘‘Voluntary Professional’’ is defined in
CBOE’s rules as any person or entity that is not a
broker or dealer in securities that elects, in writing,
to be treated in the same manner as a broker or
dealer in securities for purposes of specified rules
relating to priority in the execution of orders, and
for cancellation fee calculation purposes. See Rule
1.1(fff) and Securities Exchange Act Release No.
58327 (August 7, 2008), 73 FR 47988 (August 15,
2008) (SR–CBOE–2008–09). As part of this
proposed rule change, the Exchange is proposing to
amend Rule 1.1(fff) to provide that a Voluntary
Professional will be treated in the same manner as
a broker or dealer in securities for purposes of Rule
6.8C.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:28 Apr 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
positions in the security during the
same day. The Exchange proposes to
remove the last condition pertaining to
the multiple acquisition and liquidation
of positions from its list of factors used
for determining whether a beneficial
owner is operating as a market maker.
The Exchange noted that this activity no
longer should be considered as a factor
in determining whether a beneficial
owner is effectively acting as a market
maker.
III. Discussion
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange 5 and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6 of the
Act.6 Specifically, the Commission finds
that the proposal is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,7 in that the
proposal has been designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade,
and to protect investors and the public
interest.
The Commission believes that it is
consistent with the Act for an options
exchange not to prohibit a user of its
market from operating as a market
maker without registering as such. The
Commission previously approved rules
at other options exchanges that do not
impose such a prohibition,8 or impose
such a prohibition on customers only.9
The Commission notes that while the
Exchange will continue to prohibit
5 The Commission has considered the proposed
rule change’s impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57478
(March 12, 2008), 73 FR 14521 (March 18, 2008)
(approving rules governing the trading of options on
the NASDAQ Options Market).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59472
(February 27, 2009), 74 FR 9843 (March 6, 2009)
(approval of rules for the trading of listed options
on NYSEAlternext).
The Commission notes that any entity that acts
as ‘‘dealer,’’ as defined in Section 3(a)(5) of the Act,
15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(5), would be required to register
with the Commission under Section 15 of the Act,
15 U.S.C. 78o, and the rules and regulations
thereunder, or qualify for any exception or
exemption from registration. Activity that may
cause a person to be deemed a dealer includes
‘‘ ‘quoting a market in or publishing quotes for
securities (other than quotes on one side of the
market on a quotations system generally available
to non-broker-dealers, such as a retail screen broker
for government securities).’ ’’ See Definitions of
Terms in and Specific Exemptions for Banks,
Savings Associations, and Savings Banks Under
Sections 3(a)(4) and 3(a)(5) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 47364, 68 FR 8686, 8689, note 26
(February 24, 2003) (quoting OTC Derivatives
Dealers, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40594
(October 23, 1998), 63 FR 59362, 59370, note 61
(November 3, 1998)).
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16247
customers who are not Voluntary
Professionals from operating as market
makers, those customers will continue
to have priority over the bids and offers
of market makers, other broker-dealers,
and Voluntary Professionals.
The Commission also believes that the
Exchange’s proposal to remove the
condition pertaining to the multiple
acquisition and liquidation of positions
from its list of factors used for
determining whether a beneficial owner
is operating as a market maker is
consistent with the Act. The
Commission believes that the remaining
factors are sufficient to enable the
Exchange to determine whether a user
of its market is operating as a market
maker.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,10 that the
proposed rule change (SR–CBOE–2009–
09) is approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–8002 Filed 4–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–59701; File No. SR–ISE–
2009–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Quoting
Obligations of Second Market
Competitive Market Makers
April 3, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 25,
2009, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
11 17
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 67 (Thursday, April 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16246-16247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-59700; File No. SR-CBOE-2009-009]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend its Rules
Prohibiting Members From Functioning as Market Makers
April 2, 2009.
I. Introduction
On February 18, 2009, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to revise CBOE Rule 6.8C to
eliminate certain restrictions prohibiting members
[[Page 16247]]
from functioning as market makers. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on February 26, 2009.\3\
The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order
approves the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59425 (February 19,
2009), 74 FR 8829.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.8C, Prohibition Against
Members Functioning as Market Makers, to eliminate certain of its
restrictions. Rule 6.8C currently provides that a member, acting either
as principal or agent, may neither enter nor permit the entry of orders
into the Exchange's electronic order routing system if (i) the orders
are limit orders for the account or accounts of the same beneficial
owner(s); and (ii) the limit orders are entered in such a manner that
the beneficial owner(s) effectively is operating as a market maker by
holding itself out as willing to buy and sell such securities on a
regular or continuous basis. The Exchange proposes that these
restrictions be amended to apply only to customer orders (i.e., non-
broker-dealer orders) that are not Voluntary Professional orders.\4\
The restrictions would no longer be applicable to instances where a
member is acting as principal on its own behalf or is acting as agent
on behalf of other broker-dealer orders or Voluntary Professional
orders. The Exchange noted that it is retaining the restriction for
customers who are not Voluntary Professionals because such customers
have priority at any price over the bids and offers of market makers,
other broker-dealers, and Voluntary Professionals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The term ``Voluntary Professional'' is defined in CBOE's
rules as any person or entity that is not a broker or dealer in
securities that elects, in writing, to be treated in the same manner
as a broker or dealer in securities for purposes of specified rules
relating to priority in the execution of orders, and for
cancellation fee calculation purposes. See Rule 1.1(fff) and
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58327 (August 7, 2008), 73 FR
47988 (August 15, 2008) (SR-CBOE-2008-09). As part of this proposed
rule change, the Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 1.1(fff) to
provide that a Voluntary Professional will be treated in the same
manner as a broker or dealer in securities for purposes of Rule
6.8C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, in those instances where its restrictions are
applicable, Rule 6.8C currently provides that, in determining whether a
beneficial owner effectively is operating as a market maker, the
Exchange will consider, among other things, the simultaneous or near
simultaneous entry of limit orders to buy and sell the same security,
the entry of multiple limit orders at different prices in the same
security, and the multiple acquisition and liquidation of positions in
the security during the same day. The Exchange proposes to remove the
last condition pertaining to the multiple acquisition and liquidation
of positions from its list of factors used for determining whether a
beneficial owner is operating as a market maker. The Exchange noted
that this activity no longer should be considered as a factor in
determining whether a beneficial owner is effectively acting as a
market maker.
III. Discussion
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange \5\
and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\6\
Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in that the proposal has been designed
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Commission has considered the proposed rule change's
impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that it is consistent with the Act for an
options exchange not to prohibit a user of its market from operating as
a market maker without registering as such. The Commission previously
approved rules at other options exchanges that do not impose such a
prohibition,\8\ or impose such a prohibition on customers only.\9\ The
Commission notes that while the Exchange will continue to prohibit
customers who are not Voluntary Professionals from operating as market
makers, those customers will continue to have priority over the bids
and offers of market makers, other broker-dealers, and Voluntary
Professionals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57478 (March 12,
2008), 73 FR 14521 (March 18, 2008) (approving rules governing the
trading of options on the NASDAQ Options Market).
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59472 (February 27,
2009), 74 FR 9843 (March 6, 2009) (approval of rules for the trading
of listed options on NYSEAlternext).
The Commission notes that any entity that acts as ``dealer,'' as
defined in Section 3(a)(5) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(5), would be
required to register with the Commission under Section 15 of the
Act, 15 U.S.C. 78o, and the rules and regulations thereunder, or
qualify for any exception or exemption from registration. Activity
that may cause a person to be deemed a dealer includes `` `quoting a
market in or publishing quotes for securities (other than quotes on
one side of the market on a quotations system generally available to
non-broker-dealers, such as a retail screen broker for government
securities).' '' See Definitions of Terms in and Specific Exemptions
for Banks, Savings Associations, and Savings Banks Under Sections
3(a)(4) and 3(a)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 47364, 68 FR 8686, 8689, note 26
(February 24, 2003) (quoting OTC Derivatives Dealers, Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 40594 (October 23, 1998), 63 FR 59362,
59370, note 61 (November 3, 1998)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission also believes that the Exchange's proposal to remove
the condition pertaining to the multiple acquisition and liquidation of
positions from its list of factors used for determining whether a
beneficial owner is operating as a market maker is consistent with the
Act. The Commission believes that the remaining factors are sufficient
to enable the Exchange to determine whether a user of its market is
operating as a market maker.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\10\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-2009-09) is approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8002 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P