Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, 13190-13192 [E9-6800]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
13190
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices
parties within the 30–day period
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).
The Department received no substantive
responses from any respondent
interested parties. As a result, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department is
conducting expedited (120–day) sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty
finding/orders on PC strand from Brazil,
India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and
Thailand.
Scope of the Finding/Orders
The product covered in the sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on PC strand from Brazil, India, Korea,
Mexico, and Thailand is steel strand
produced from wire of non–stainless,
non–galvanized steel, which is suitable
for use in prestressed concrete (both
pre–tensioned and post–tensioned)
applications. The product definition
encompasses covered and uncovered
strand and all types, grades, and
diameters of PC strand.
The product covered in the sunset
review of the antidumping duty finding
on PC strand from Japan is steel wire
strand, other than alloy steel, not
galvanized, which is stress–relieved and
suitable for use in prestressed concrete.
The merchandise subject to the
finding/orders is currently classifiable
under subheadings 7312.10.3010 and
7312.10.3012 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise under the finding/orders is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Finding/Orders on Prestressed Concrete
Steel Wire Strand from Brazil, India,
Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico,
and Thailand’’ from Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary John M. Andersen to
Acting Assistant Secretary Ronald K.
Lorentzen dated March 19, 2009
(Decision Memo), which is hereby
adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Decision Memo include
Country
Notification Regarding APO
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing the
final results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
20:28 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty finding/orders on PC
strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Mexico,
Korea, and Thailand would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping at the following weighted–
average percentage margins:
Weighted–Average
Margin (Percent)
Company
Brazil ............................................................................................
......................................................................................................
India .............................................................................................
......................................................................................................
Japan ...........................................................................................
......................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
Korea ...........................................................................................
......................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
Mexico ..........................................................................................
......................................................................................................
......................................................................................................
Thailand .......................................................................................
......................................................................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the finding/orders were
revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in these
reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in the
Central Records Unit, room 1117 of the
main Department of Commerce
building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memo are identical in
content.
Belgo Bekaert Arames S.A.
All Others
Tata Iron and Steel Co., Ltd.
All Others
Shinko Wire Co., Ltd.
Suzuki Metal Industry Co., Ltd.
Tokyo Rope Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
All Others
Dong–Il Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Kiswire Ltd.
All Others
Aceros Camesa S.A. de C.V.
Cablesa S.A. de C.V.
All Others
Siam Industrial Wire Co., Ltd.
All Others
Dated: March 19, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–6797 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
118.75
118.75
102.07
83.65
13.30
6.90
4.50
9.76
54.19
54.19
35.64
62.78
77.20
62.78
12.91
12.91
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–427–801, A–428–801, A–475–801, A–588–
804, A–412–801
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from
France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the
United Kingdom: Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 1, 2008, in response
to requests from interested parties, the
Department of Commerce published a
notice of initiation of the administrative
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices
on ball bearings and parts thereof from
France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the
United Kingdom. The period of review
is May 1, 2007, through April 30, 2008.
The Department of Commerce is
rescinding these reviews in part.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Yang Jin
Chun or Richard Rimlinger, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5760 and (202)
482–4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2008, in response to
requests from interested parties, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published a notice of
initiation of the administrative reviews
of the antidumping duty orders on ball
bearings and parts thereof from France,
Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United
Kingdom. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 73 FR 37409 (July 1, 2008).
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d), the Department will rescind
an administrative review in part ‘‘if a
party that requested a review withdraws
the request within 90 days of the date
of the publication of notice of initiation
of the requested review.’’ In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department may extend the 90–day time
limit if the Department ‘‘decides that it
is reasonable to do so.’’ On October 3,
2008, for all interested parties which
requested the administrative reviews of
13191
the antidumping duty orders on ball
bearings and parts thereof from Japan
and the United Kingdom, we extended
the due date for withdrawing the
requests for reviews to October 10, 2008,
because all respondents that we selected
for individual examination in these two
reviews had withdrawn their requests
for reviews in a timely manner and
because we had to identify additional
respondents for individual examination.
On October 14, 2008, for Canon, Inc., we
extended the due date for withdrawing
the request for review to October 15,
2008, based on the circumstances stated
in Canon, Inc.’s October 14, 2008, letter
requesting an extension of the due date.
Subsequent to the initiation of these
reviews, we received timely
withdrawals of the requests we had
received for the reviews as follows:
Country
Company
France ..............................................................................................................................
Germany ..........................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
Italy ..................................................................................................................................
Japan ...............................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
United Kingdom ...............................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................
ADR S.A.1
Dolmar GmbH1
SNR Walzlager GmbH1
Edwards, Ltd., and Edwards High Vacuum Int’l Ltd.1
Aisin Seiki Company Ltd.1
Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd.1
Canon, Inc.2
JTEKT Corporation1
Keihin Corporation3
Makino Milling Machine Company Ltd.3
Makita Corporation3
Mazda Motor Corporation3
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.1
Nachi–Fujikoshi Corporation1
Nippon Pillow Block Company Limited1
Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.3
NSK, Ltd.1
NTN Corporation1
Univance Inc.3
Yamazaki Mazak Trading Corporation1
Edwards, Ltd., and Edwards High Vacuum Int’l Ltd.1
NSK Bearings Europe Ltd.1
Rolls–Royce PLC1
1 We received timely withdrawals of the requests for reviews of these companies on or before September 29, 2008, which was the last day of
the regulatory 90-day period in which interested parties could withdraw a request for review.
2 We received a timely withdrawal of the request for review of Canon, Inc., on October 15, 2008.
3 We received timely withdrawals of the requests for reviews of these companies between October 8, 2008, and October 10, 2008.
Because there are no other requests
for review of the above–named firms,
we are rescinding the reviews with
respect to these companies in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d). We
also received a timely withdrawal of the
request we received for Sapporo
Precision, Inc. (Sapporo), with respect
to the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on ball bearings
and parts thereof from Japan. A review
of Sapporo was also requested by
another interested party which has not
withdrawn its request. Consequently,
we continue to conduct the
administrative review of Sapporo.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
20:28 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Rescission of Reviews
The Department received the timely
submitted letters withdrawing the
requests for the reviews of the
companies listed above within the 90–
day period or within the specific
extended due dates. The Department
received no other requests for the
reviews of these companies. Pursuant to
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is
rescinding the reviews in part with
respect to ball bearings and parts thereof
produced and/or exported by the
companies as stated above. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Border Protection 15 days after
publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to
importers of their responsibility under
19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s assumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
13192
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Notices
Notification Regarding APO
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
rescissions in part in accordance with
section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
International Trade Administration
International Trade Administration
University of Colorado, et al.; Notice of
Consolidated Decision on Applications
for Duty–Free Entry of Electron
Microscopes
This is a decision consolidated
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 3705,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue., NW, Washington,
D.C.
Docket Number: 08–041. Applicant:
University of Colorado, Denver, CO
80217. Instrument: Vitrification Robot.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, The
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
74 FR 7394, February 17, 2009.
Docket Number: 08–052. Applicant:
University of Washington, Seattle, WA
98105–6698. Instrument: CTD Chain III.
Manufacturer: ADM Electronik,
Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 74
FR 7395, February 17, 2009.
Docket Number: 08–056. Applicant:
Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont,
IL 60439. Instrument: Isobar Separator
System. Manufacturer: Bruker Biospin
S.A., France. Intended Use: See notice at
74 FR 7395, February 17, 2009.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
RIN 0648–XO24
University of Colorado, et al.; Notice of
Consolidated Decision on Applications
for Duty-Free Entry of Electron
Microscopes
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Jkt 217001
Dated: March 19, 2009.
Chris Cassel,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement
Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–6798 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
20:28 Mar 25, 2009
Dated: March 19, 2009.
Chris Cassel,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement
Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–6799 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign
instrument is an electron microscope
and is intended for research or scientific
educational uses requiring an electron
microscope. We know of no electron
microscope, or any other instrument
suited to these purposes, which was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of order of each instrument.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Dated: March 19, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–6800 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
instrument, for such purposes as these
instruments are intended to be used,
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time the instruments were
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign
instrument is an electron microscope
and is intended for research or scientific
educational uses requiring an electron
microscope. We know of no electron
microscope, or any other instrument
suited to these purposes, which was
being manufactured in the United States
at the time of order of each instrument.
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Take of Anadromous Fish
This is a decision consolidated
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Room 3705, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC.
Docket Number: 08–050. Applicant:
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
80309–0427. Instrument: Dual Beam FIB
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Czech Republic. Intended
Use: See notice at 74 FR 7588, February
18, 2009.
Docket Number: 08–051. Applicant:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Instrument: Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, The
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
74 FR 7588, February 18, 2009.
Docket Number: 08–062. Applicant:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh,
PA 15213. Instrument: Scanning
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, The Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 74 FR 7588, February
18, 2009.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as these
instruments are intended to be used,
was being manufactured in the United
States at the time the instruments were
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of a permit
application; request for comments.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
NMFS has received an application for a
permit (permit 14579) to conduct
steelhead rescue activities for
population enhancement purposes from
the Protected Resource Division of
NMFS office in Long Beach (PRDLB),
California. The requested permit would
affect the Southern California Coast
Distinct Population Segment of
endangered steelhead trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss). The public is
hereby notified of the availability of the
permit application for review and
comment before NMFS either approves
or disapproves the application.
DATES: Written comments on the permit
application must be received at the
appropriate address or fax number (see
ADDRESSES) on or before April 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
permit application should be sent to
Matt McGoogan, Protected Resources
Division, NMFS, 501 W. Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
Comments may also be sent using email
(FRNpermits.lb@noaa.gov) or fax (562)
980–4027. The permit application is
available for review, by appointment, at
the foregoing address and is also
available for review online at the
Authorizations and Permits for
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13190-13192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6800]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-427-801, A-428-801, A-475-801, A-588-804, A-412-801
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy,
Japan, and the United Kingdom: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 1, 2008, in response to requests from interested
parties, the Department of Commerce published a notice of initiation of
the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders
[[Page 13191]]
on ball bearings and parts thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan,
and the United Kingdom. The period of review is May 1, 2007, through
April 30, 2008. The Department of Commerce is rescinding these reviews
in part.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Yang Jin Chun or Richard Rimlinger, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14\th\ Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5760 and (202) 482-4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2008, in response to requests from interested parties,
the Department of Commerce (the Department) published a notice of
initiation of the administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on ball bearings and parts thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan,
and the United Kingdom. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation
in Part, 73 FR 37409 (July 1, 2008).
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d), the Department will rescind
an administrative review in part ``if a party that requested a review
withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of the publication of
notice of initiation of the requested review.'' In accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department may extend the 90-day time limit if
the Department ``decides that it is reasonable to do so.'' On October
3, 2008, for all interested parties which requested the administrative
reviews of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings and parts
thereof from Japan and the United Kingdom, we extended the due date for
withdrawing the requests for reviews to October 10, 2008, because all
respondents that we selected for individual examination in these two
reviews had withdrawn their requests for reviews in a timely manner and
because we had to identify additional respondents for individual
examination. On October 14, 2008, for Canon, Inc., we extended the due
date for withdrawing the request for review to October 15, 2008, based
on the circumstances stated in Canon, Inc.'s October 14, 2008, letter
requesting an extension of the due date.
Subsequent to the initiation of these reviews, we received timely
withdrawals of the requests we had received for the reviews as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country Company
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
France.................................................... ADR S.A.\1\
Germany................................................... Dolmar GmbH\1\
SNR Walzlager GmbH\1\
Italy..................................................... Edwards, Ltd., and Edwards High Vacuum Int'l Ltd.\1\
Japan..................................................... Aisin Seiki Company Ltd.\1\
Asahi Seiko Co., Ltd.\1\
Canon, Inc.\2\
JTEKT Corporation\1\
Keihin Corporation\3\
Makino Milling Machine Company Ltd.\3\
Makita Corporation\3\
Mazda Motor Corporation\3\
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.\1\
Nachi-Fujikoshi Corporation\1\
Nippon Pillow Block Company Limited\1\
Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.\3\
NSK, Ltd.\1\
NTN Corporation\1\
Univance Inc.\3\
Yamazaki Mazak Trading Corporation\1\
United Kingdom............................................ Edwards, Ltd., and Edwards High Vacuum Int'l Ltd.\1\
NSK Bearings Europe Ltd.\1\
Rolls-Royce PLC\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We received timely withdrawals of the requests for reviews of these companies on or before September 29,
2008, which was the last day of the regulatory 90-day period in which interested parties could withdraw a
request for review.
\2\ We received a timely withdrawal of the request for review of Canon, Inc., on October 15, 2008.
\3\ We received timely withdrawals of the requests for reviews of these companies between October 8, 2008, and
October 10, 2008.
Because there are no other requests for review of the above-named
firms, we are rescinding the reviews with respect to these companies in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d). We also received a timely withdrawal
of the request we received for Sapporo Precision, Inc. (Sapporo), with
respect to the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
ball bearings and parts thereof from Japan. A review of Sapporo was
also requested by another interested party which has not withdrawn its
request. Consequently, we continue to conduct the administrative review
of Sapporo.
Rescission of Reviews
The Department received the timely submitted letters withdrawing
the requests for the reviews of the companies listed above within the
90-day period or within the specific extended due dates. The Department
received no other requests for the reviews of these companies. Pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department is rescinding the reviews in
part with respect to ball bearings and parts thereof produced and/or
exported by the companies as stated above. The Department intends to
issue appropriate assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection 15 days after publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's assumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
[[Page 13192]]
Notification Regarding APO
This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these rescissions in part in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 19, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-6800 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
