Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System, 11474-11476 [E9-6013]
Download as PDF
11474
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Terrorism.
■ Accordingly, part 744 of the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
parts 730–774) is amended as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181,
3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O.
12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p.
356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996
Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3
CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR
44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O.
13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
786; Notice of July 23, 2008, 73 FR 43603
(July 25, 2008); Notice of November 10, 2008,
73 FR 67097 (November 12, 2008)
PART 744—[AMENDED]
■
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required to be given for this rule by 5
U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the
analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq., are not applicable.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 744
2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is
amended:
■ (a) By removing under United Arab
Emirates, these four U.A.E. entities
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 744 continues to read as follows:
■
‘‘Akbar Ashraf Vaghefi, Shop No. 3–4
Sharafia Ahmed Ali Building, Al
Nakheel, Deira, Dubai, U.A.E. (See
alternate address under Germany)’’;
‘‘Antony Emmanuel, No. 3 & 4; Sharifia
Ahmed Ali Bldg, P.O. Box 42340, Al
Nakheel , Deira, Dubai, U.A.E. (See
alternate address under Hong Kong)’’;
‘‘Bazaar Trading Co., No. 212 Baniyas
Tower, Dubai, U.A.E. 6708’’; and
‘‘Elmstone Trading L.L.C., P.O. Box
24896, Sharjah, U.A.E.’’;
■ (b) By revising under Germany, in
alphabetical order, one German entity;
and
■ (c) By revising under Hong Kong, in
alphabetical order, one Hong Kong
entity to read as follows:
SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 TO PART 7–4—ENTITY LIST
Country
Entity
License requirement
License review
policy
Federal Register Citation
*
GERMANY ..................
*
*
*
*
Akbar Ashraf Vaghefi, Koburgerstr 10, D– For all items subject to
10825, Berlin, Germany.
the EAR. (See § 744.11
of the EAR).
*
Presumption of
denial.
*
73 FR 54504, 9/22/08, 74
FR [INSERT FR PAGE
NUMBER] 03/18/09.
*
HONG KONG ..............
*
*
*
*
Antony Emmanuel, No: 3 & 4; 12F Com- For all items subject to
mercial VIP Building, 112–116 Canton
the EAR. (See § 744.11
Rd., Tsim Sha Tsui, Hong Kong.
of the EAR).
*
Presumption of
denial.
*
73 FR 54505, 9/22/08, 74
FR [INSERT FR PAGE
NUMBER] 03/18/09.
*
*
*
Dated: March 13, 2009.
Matthew S. Borman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–5860 Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am]
*
*
entering the United States seven weeks
earlier than it would otherwise be
available to the public. Aggregate data
collected from the licenses are made
available to the public on a weekly basis
following review by the Department.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
18, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about the SIMA system,
please contact Kelly Parkhill (202) 482–
3791 or Julie Al-Saadawi (202) 482–
1930.
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
19 CFR Part 360
[Docket No.: 0809261282–9117–02]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 0625–AA82
Background
Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis
System
tjames on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) publishes this action
to make final a rule to extend the Steel
Import Monitoring and Analysis (SIMA)
system until March 21, 2013. The
purpose of the SIMA system is to
provide statistical data on steel imports
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:31 Mar 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
The SIMA system has been operating
under its current authority since March
21, 2005. Prior to this date, authority for
steel import licensing and monitoring
was derived from the Proclamation 7529
of March 5, 2002, which placed
temporary tariffs on many steel imports
and provided the steel industry time to
restructure. The monitoring system
outlined in Proclamation 7529 required
all importers of steel products to obtain
a license from the Department prior to
completing their Customs entry
summary documentation. This provided
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
a monitoring tool to ensure that the
effectiveness of the safeguard was not
undermined by large quantities of
imports originating from countries that
were excluded from the tariffs.
In Proclamation 7741 of December 4,
2003 (68 FR 68483), the President
terminated the steel safeguard measures,
but directed the Secretary of Commerce
to continue the monitoring system until
the earlier of March 21, 2005, or such
time as the Secretary of Commerce
established a replacement program. On
December 9, 2003, the Department
published a notice stating that the
system would continue in effect as
described in Proclamation 7741 until
March 21, 2005 (68 FR 68594). On
August 25, 2004, the Department
published an advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking soliciting
comments from the public on whether
to continue the monitoring system
beyond March 21, 2005 (69 FR 52211).
On March 11, 2005, the Department
published an interim final rule
responding to the comments received
from the public and implementing a
slightly expanded version of SIMA until
March 21, 2009. That interim final was
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
tjames on PRODPC61 with RULES
followed by the publication of the final
rule on December 5, 2005 (70 FR 72373).
On December 12, 2008, a proposed
rule was published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 75624) seeking an
extension of the SIMA system through
March 21, 2013 and asking for
comments from the public. The
Department received twelve comments
all supportive of the extension.
The Department issues this final rule
to extend the application of the SIMA
system until March 21, 2013. No other
changes are made to the regulations for
the SIMA system. The purpose of the
SIMA system is to provide steel
producers, steel consumers, importers,
and the general public with accurate
and timely information on anticipated
imports of certain steel products. Import
licenses, obtained through the internetbased SIMA licensing system, are
required on U.S. imports of basic steel
mill products. Aggregate import data
obtained from the licenses is updated
weekly and posted on the SIMA Web
site monitor. Details of the current
system can be found on https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/steel/license.
Response to Comments
Submissions received during the
public comment period established in
the proposed rule have been considered
in preparing this final rule. Twelve
submissions were received from
individual steel producers, various
industry and distributor trade groups,
and the United Steelworkers. All of the
comments received were supportive of
the four-year extension and agreed that
the system is a critical tool that helps
the industry to closely monitor steel
imports. The comments are summarized
below. The twelve comments received
are posted on the Federal rulemaking
portal at www.Regulations.gov and they
are also posted on the SIMA Web site at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov/steel/license.
Comment 1: Commenters strongly
support the extension of the SIMA
system for an additional four years.
They stated that given the volatility of
world steel markets, the SIMA system
gives the public access to the timeliest
information possible regarding import
patterns and changes. They also see it as
an important and transparent tool to
support rational decision-making by all
interested parties—steel producers, steel
users, importers and U.S. government
officials.
Response: The Department agrees that
the SIMA system provides the public
valuable timely information on steel
imports. It also agrees that the posting
of aggregate import volume and pricing
data drawn from the licenses on a
public website provides all interested
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:31 Mar 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
stakeholders with a better
understanding of changing market
conditions in a transparent fashion.
Comment 2: Commenters stated that
there is no significant burden on the
steel importing community to comply
with the licensing requirements of the
SIMA system and that this has been
confirmed over the last four years in its
current format, which remains
unchanged by the proposed rule.
Response: The Department agrees
with the comments that there is no
significant burden on steel importers
arising out of SIMA system licensing
requirements. The web-based licensing
system is automatic and free of charge.
The Department estimates that it
continues to take no longer than ten
minutes to completely fill out the
automated license form and for most
applicants the time expended is much
less.
Comment 3: Commenters suggest that
the Department make the SIMA system
permanent rather than extend it for
another four years. They state that the
system has proven its effectiveness as an
important analytical tool for both steel
producers and consumers.
Response: Broad authority to collect
information on imports is granted to the
Secretary of Commerce and delegated to
the Director of the Bureau of the Census.
When the original safeguard authority
for the SIMA system granted by the
President expired in March 2005, the
system was continued pursuant to this
Department of Commerce information
collection authority (13 U.S.C. 301(a)
and 302). For purposes of administering
the SIMA system, this authority was
temporarily transferred from the
Director of the Census Bureau to the
Under Secretary for International Trade
for four years. One of the conditions of
the temporary transfer of authority to
the Under Secretary for International
Trade was that any future periodic
extensions of the SIMA system be
notified to the Secretary and subject to
review. Therefore, establishment of a
permanent system is not possible under
current authority.
Comment 4: Commenters suggested
that the Department add metal forming
products to the downstream monitor to
the extent they can be defined by
HTSUS codes.
Response: The Department intends to
add these products to the downstream
monitor using publicly available data.
For the reasons discussed above, the
proposed rule (19 CFR part 360) is made
final without changes.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11475
Classification
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not contain policies
with federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to waive the
30-day delay in effectiveness. The
Department issues this final rule to
extend the requirement for import
licenses through the Internet-based
SIMA licensing system on U.S. imports
of basic steel mill products of the SIMA
system until March 21, 2013. The
purpose of the SIMA system is to
provide steel producers, steel
consumers, importers, and the general
public with accurate and timely
information on anticipated imports of
certain steel products. This final rule
would extend the requirement for such
licenses from March 21, 2009 until
March 21, 2013. It is necessary to waive
the 30-day delay in effectiveness to
ensure that the regulations requiring
importers to obtain an import license
from the SIMA system do not terminate,
thereby ensuring the collection of timely
and complete data on imports of
covered items, and possibly preventing
confusion or delay of imports at entry
summary. If the Department were to
allow for the 30-day delay in
effectiveness, there would be a lapse in
the requirement for an import license.
As a result, importers may be confused
about the need for a license and delay
their filing of summary documents
while trying to obtain one which could
lead to possible fines and penalties. In
addition, without current information
from the licenses, the monitor would
fall out of date and the public would be
without the quality information they
have come to depend upon. Therefore,
to ensure the collection of timely and
complete data, and to prevent any
confusion and delay associated with a
lapse in the license requirements for
SIMA, the Department finds good cause
to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness, and to make these
regulations effective upon publication.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that the
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
11476
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
that term is defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The
factual basis is found in the proposed
rule and is not repeated here. No
comments were received on the
certification or the economic impacts of
this action. As a result, no final
regulatory flexibility analysis was
prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to
review and approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
These requirements have been approved
by OMB (OMB No. 0625–0245;
Expiration Date: 09/30/2011). Public
reporting for this collection of
information is estimated to be less than
ten minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. All responses to this
collection of information are voluntary,
and will be provided confidentially to
the extent allowed by law.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 360
Administrative practice and
procedure, Business and industry,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Steel.
Dated: March 13, 2009.
Michelle O’Neill,
Acting Under Secretary for International
Trade.
For reasons discussed in the
preamble, 19 CFR part 360 is amended
to read as follows:
■
PART 360—STEEL IMPORT
MONITORING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM
1. The authority citation for part 360
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302.
2. Section 360.105 is revised to read
as follows:
■
tjames on PRODPC61 with RULES
§ 360.105 Duration of the steel import
licensing requirement.
The licensing program will be in
effect through March 21, 2013, but may
be extended upon review and
notification in the Federal Register
prior to this expiration date. Licenses
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:31 Mar 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
will be required on all subject imports
entered during this period, even if the
entry summary documents are not filed
until after the expiration of this
program. The licenses will be valid for
10 business days after the expiration of
this program to allow for the final filing
of required Customs documentation.
[FR Doc. E9–6013 Filed 3–16–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 172
[Docket No. FDA–2005–F–0505] (formerly
Docket No. 2005F–0138)
Food Additives Permitted for Direct
Addition to Food for Human
Consumption; Silver Nitrate and
Hydrogen Peroxide
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
food additive regulations to provide for
the safe use of an aqueous solution of
silver nitrate and hydrogen peroxide as
an antimicrobial agent in bottled water.
This action is in response to a petition
filed by Kareem I. Batarseh.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
18, 2009. Submit written or electronic
objections and requests for a hearing by
April 17, 2009. See section VIII of this
document for information on the filing
of objections. The Director of the
Federal Register approves the
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51 of certain publications in 21
CFR 172.167 as of March 18, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written or
electronic objections and requests for a
hearing identified by Docket No. FDA–
2005–F–0505 (formerly Docket No.
2005F–0138) by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic objections in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written objections in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions]:
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
To ensure more timely processing of
objections, FDA is no longer accepting
objections submitted to the agency by email. FDA encourages you to continue
to submit electronic objections by using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as
described in the Electronic Submissions
portion of this paragraph.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
objections received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
objections, see the ‘‘Objections’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
objections received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number(s), found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mical E. Honigfort, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–
265), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park,
MD 20740–3835, 301–436–1278.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In a notice published in the Federal
Register of April 18, 2005 (70 FR
20145), FDA announced that a food
additive petition (FAP 5A4759) had
been filed by Kareem I. Batarseh, P.O.
Box 8, College Park, MD 20741–0008.
The petition proposed to amend the
food additive regulations in part 172,
Food Additives Permitted for Direct
Addition to Food for Human
Consumption (21 CFR part 172), to
provide for the safe use of an aqueous
solution of silver nitrate and hydrogen
peroxide as an antimicrobial agent in
bottled drinking water at a level not to
exceed 17 micrograms per kilogram (μg/
kg) of silver and 23 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg) of hydrogen peroxide
in the treated bottled water.
II. Evaluation of Safety
Under the general safety standard in
section 409 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
348), a food additive cannot be
approved for a particular use unless a
fair evaluation of the data available to
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 18, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11474-11476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6013]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
19 CFR Part 360
[Docket No.: 0809261282-9117-02]
RIN 0625-AA82
Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) publishes this
action to make final a rule to extend the Steel Import Monitoring and
Analysis (SIMA) system until March 21, 2013. The purpose of the SIMA
system is to provide statistical data on steel imports entering the
United States seven weeks earlier than it would otherwise be available
to the public. Aggregate data collected from the licenses are made
available to the public on a weekly basis following review by the
Department.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 18, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the SIMA system,
please contact Kelly Parkhill (202) 482-3791 or Julie Al-Saadawi (202)
482-1930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The SIMA system has been operating under its current authority
since March 21, 2005. Prior to this date, authority for steel import
licensing and monitoring was derived from the Proclamation 7529 of
March 5, 2002, which placed temporary tariffs on many steel imports and
provided the steel industry time to restructure. The monitoring system
outlined in Proclamation 7529 required all importers of steel products
to obtain a license from the Department prior to completing their
Customs entry summary documentation. This provided a monitoring tool to
ensure that the effectiveness of the safeguard was not undermined by
large quantities of imports originating from countries that were
excluded from the tariffs.
In Proclamation 7741 of December 4, 2003 (68 FR 68483), the
President terminated the steel safeguard measures, but directed the
Secretary of Commerce to continue the monitoring system until the
earlier of March 21, 2005, or such time as the Secretary of Commerce
established a replacement program. On December 9, 2003, the Department
published a notice stating that the system would continue in effect as
described in Proclamation 7741 until March 21, 2005 (68 FR 68594). On
August 25, 2004, the Department published an advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking soliciting comments from the public on whether to
continue the monitoring system beyond March 21, 2005 (69 FR 52211). On
March 11, 2005, the Department published an interim final rule
responding to the comments received from the public and implementing a
slightly expanded version of SIMA until March 21, 2009. That interim
final was
[[Page 11475]]
followed by the publication of the final rule on December 5, 2005 (70
FR 72373).
On December 12, 2008, a proposed rule was published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 75624) seeking an extension of the SIMA system through
March 21, 2013 and asking for comments from the public. The Department
received twelve comments all supportive of the extension.
The Department issues this final rule to extend the application of
the SIMA system until March 21, 2013. No other changes are made to the
regulations for the SIMA system. The purpose of the SIMA system is to
provide steel producers, steel consumers, importers, and the general
public with accurate and timely information on anticipated imports of
certain steel products. Import licenses, obtained through the internet-
based SIMA licensing system, are required on U.S. imports of basic
steel mill products. Aggregate import data obtained from the licenses
is updated weekly and posted on the SIMA Web site monitor. Details of
the current system can be found on https://ia.ita.doc.gov/steel/license.
Response to Comments
Submissions received during the public comment period established
in the proposed rule have been considered in preparing this final rule.
Twelve submissions were received from individual steel producers,
various industry and distributor trade groups, and the United
Steelworkers. All of the comments received were supportive of the four-
year extension and agreed that the system is a critical tool that helps
the industry to closely monitor steel imports. The comments are
summarized below. The twelve comments received are posted on the
Federal rulemaking portal at www.Regulations.gov and they are also
posted on the SIMA Web site at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/steel/license.
Comment 1: Commenters strongly support the extension of the SIMA
system for an additional four years. They stated that given the
volatility of world steel markets, the SIMA system gives the public
access to the timeliest information possible regarding import patterns
and changes. They also see it as an important and transparent tool to
support rational decision-making by all interested parties--steel
producers, steel users, importers and U.S. government officials.
Response: The Department agrees that the SIMA system provides the
public valuable timely information on steel imports. It also agrees
that the posting of aggregate import volume and pricing data drawn from
the licenses on a public website provides all interested stakeholders
with a better understanding of changing market conditions in a
transparent fashion.
Comment 2: Commenters stated that there is no significant burden on
the steel importing community to comply with the licensing requirements
of the SIMA system and that this has been confirmed over the last four
years in its current format, which remains unchanged by the proposed
rule.
Response: The Department agrees with the comments that there is no
significant burden on steel importers arising out of SIMA system
licensing requirements. The web-based licensing system is automatic and
free of charge. The Department estimates that it continues to take no
longer than ten minutes to completely fill out the automated license
form and for most applicants the time expended is much less.
Comment 3: Commenters suggest that the Department make the SIMA
system permanent rather than extend it for another four years. They
state that the system has proven its effectiveness as an important
analytical tool for both steel producers and consumers.
Response: Broad authority to collect information on imports is
granted to the Secretary of Commerce and delegated to the Director of
the Bureau of the Census. When the original safeguard authority for the
SIMA system granted by the President expired in March 2005, the system
was continued pursuant to this Department of Commerce information
collection authority (13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302). For purposes of
administering the SIMA system, this authority was temporarily
transferred from the Director of the Census Bureau to the Under
Secretary for International Trade for four years. One of the conditions
of the temporary transfer of authority to the Under Secretary for
International Trade was that any future periodic extensions of the SIMA
system be notified to the Secretary and subject to review. Therefore,
establishment of a permanent system is not possible under current
authority.
Comment 4: Commenters suggested that the Department add metal
forming products to the downstream monitor to the extent they can be
defined by HTSUS codes.
Response: The Department intends to add these products to the
downstream monitor using publicly available data.
For the reasons discussed above, the proposed rule (19 CFR part
360) is made final without changes.
Classification
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not contain policies with federalism implications as
that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to waive
the 30-day delay in effectiveness. The Department issues this final
rule to extend the requirement for import licenses through the
Internet-based SIMA licensing system on U.S. imports of basic steel
mill products of the SIMA system until March 21, 2013. The purpose of
the SIMA system is to provide steel producers, steel consumers,
importers, and the general public with accurate and timely information
on anticipated imports of certain steel products. This final rule would
extend the requirement for such licenses from March 21, 2009 until
March 21, 2013. It is necessary to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness to ensure that the regulations requiring importers to
obtain an import license from the SIMA system do not terminate, thereby
ensuring the collection of timely and complete data on imports of
covered items, and possibly preventing confusion or delay of imports at
entry summary. If the Department were to allow for the 30-day delay in
effectiveness, there would be a lapse in the requirement for an import
license. As a result, importers may be confused about the need for a
license and delay their filing of summary documents while trying to
obtain one which could lead to possible fines and penalties. In
addition, without current information from the licenses, the monitor
would fall out of date and the public would be without the quality
information they have come to depend upon. Therefore, to ensure the
collection of timely and complete data, and to prevent any confusion
and delay associated with a lapse in the license requirements for SIMA,
the Department finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness, and to make these regulations effective upon
publication.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that the proposed rule, if adopted, would not
[[Page 11476]]
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as that term is defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq. The factual basis is found in the proposed rule and
is not repeated here. No comments were received on the certification or
the economic impacts of this action. As a result, no final regulatory
flexibility analysis was prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). These requirements have
been approved by OMB (OMB No. 0625-0245; Expiration Date: 09/30/2011).
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be
less than ten minutes per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection of information are
voluntary, and will be provided confidentially to the extent allowed by
law.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 360
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Steel.
Dated: March 13, 2009.
Michelle O'Neill,
Acting Under Secretary for International Trade.
0
For reasons discussed in the preamble, 19 CFR part 360 is amended to
read as follows:
PART 360--STEEL IMPORT MONITORING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM
0
1. The authority citation for part 360 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302.
0
2. Section 360.105 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 360.105 Duration of the steel import licensing requirement.
The licensing program will be in effect through March 21, 2013, but
may be extended upon review and notification in the Federal Register
prior to this expiration date. Licenses will be required on all subject
imports entered during this period, even if the entry summary documents
are not filed until after the expiration of this program. The licenses
will be valid for 10 business days after the expiration of this program
to allow for the final filing of required Customs documentation.
[FR Doc. E9-6013 Filed 3-16-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P