Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 11593-11596 [E9-5803]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices IV. List of Recognized Standards FDA maintains the agency’s current list of FDA recognized consensus standards in a searchable database that may be accessed directly at FDA’s Internet site at https:// www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/ cfdocs/cfStandards/search.cfm. FDA will incorporate the modifications and minor revisions described in this document into the database and, upon publication in the Federal Register, this recognition of consensus standards will be effective. FDA will announce additional modifications and minor revisions to the list of recognized consensus standards, as needed, in the Federal Register once a year, or more often, if necessary. V. Recommendation of Standards for Recognition by FDA Any person may recommend consensus standards as candidates for recognition under the new provision of section 514 of the act by submitting such recommendations, with reasons for the recommendation, to the contact person (See FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). To be properly considered such recommendations should contain, at a minimum, the following information: (1) Title of the standard; (2) any reference number and date; (3) name and address of the national or international standards development organization; (4) a proposed list of devices for which a declaration of conformity to this standard should routinely apply; and (5) a brief identification of the testing or performance or other characteristics of the device(s) that would be addressed by a declaration of conformity. tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES VI. Electronic Access You may obtain a copy of ‘‘Guidance on the Recognition and Use of Consensus Standards’’ by using the Internet. CDRH maintains a site on the Internet for easy access to information including text, graphics, and files that you may download to a personal computer with access to the Internet. Updated on a regular basis, the CDRH home page includes the guidance as well as the current list of recognized standards and other standards related documents. After publication in the Federal Register, this document announcing ‘‘Modification to the List of Recognized Standards, Recognition List Number: 021’’ will be available on the CDRH home page. You may access the CDRH home page at https://www.fda.gov/ cdrh. You may access ‘‘Guidance on the Recognition and Use of Consensus VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:48 Mar 17, 2009 Jkt 217001 Standards,’’ and the searchable database for ‘‘FDA Recognized Consensus Standards’’ through the hyperlink at https://www.fda.gov/cdrh/stdsprog.html. This Federal Register document on modifications in FDA’s recognition of consensus standards is available at https://www.fda.gov/cdrh/fedregin.html. VII. Submission of Comments and Effective Date Interested persons may submit to the contact person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) written or electronic comments regarding this document. Two copies of any mailed comments are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FDA will consider any comments received in determining whether to amend the current listing of modifications to the list of recognized standards, Recognition List Number: 021. These modifications to the list or recognized standards are effective upon publication of this document in the Federal Register. Dated: March 10, 2009. Daniel G. Schultz, Director, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. [FR Doc. E9–5858 Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276– 1243. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11593 of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Proposed Project: National Evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program: Phase VI— NEW. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center of Mental Health Services is responsible for the national evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program (Children’s Mental Health Initiative— CMHI) that will collect data on child mental health outcomes, family life, and service system development and performance. Data will be collected on 26 service systems, and approximately 5,541 children and families. Data collection for this evaluation will be conducted over a five-year period. Child and family outcomes of interest will be collected at intake and during subsequent follow-up sessions at sixmonth intervals. The length of time that individual families will participate in the study ranges from 12 to 24 months depending upon when they enter the evaluation. The outcome measures include the following: Child symptomatology and functioning, family functioning, satisfaction, and caregiver strain. The core of service system data will be collected every 18– 24 months throughout the 5-year evaluation period, with a sustainability survey conducted in years 3 and 5. Service utilization and cost data will be tracked and submitted to the national evaluation every six months using two tools: The Flex Fund Tool and the Services and Costs Data Tool to estimate average cost of treatment per child, distribution of costs, and allocation of costs across service categories. Service delivery and system variables of interest include the following: Maturity of system of care development in funded system of care communities, adherence to the system of care program model, and client service experience. We will also conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the CMHI’s data driven technical assistance; this component of the evaluation will employ a mixedmethods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative data to provide a comprehensive assessment of the continuous quality improvement (CQI) process in funded system of care E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM 18MRN1 11594 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices communities. Specifically, data will be gathered through three complementary activities: A baseline survey of key constituents in all funded communities; a subsequent monitoring survey administered every two years to the same constituents; and biennial case studies of four selected communities. In addition, the evaluation will include three special studies: (1) The sector specific assessment and quasiexperimental comparison study will examine in more detail the outcomes and service experience of children from multiple child-serving sectors and, through child-level matching, compare these outcomes with those not receiving system of care services; (2) The Alumni Instrument Network Study will examine the effectiveness of the system of care Alumni Network Web site by evaluating end-user satisfaction and usability of the Web site and will also assess the collaboration between communities via a Web-based Networking and Collaboration Survey that will measure the nature and extent of the interaction between communities; (3) The Study of State Strategies for Sustainability will examine the State’s role in sustaining communities after Federal funding ceases and describe effective strategies for sustaining funded systems of care. A short version of the sustainability survey developed for this evaluation will be used to gather this information. Number of respondents Respondent Internet-based technology such as Web-based surveys and data entry and management tools will be used in this evaluation. The measures of the national evaluation address the national outcome measures for mental health programs as currently established by SAMHSA. The average annual respondent burden is estimated below. The estimate reflects the average number of respondents in each respondent category, the average number of responses per respondent per year, the average length of time it will take to complete each response, and the total average annual burden for each category of respondent, and for all categories of respondents combined. Total average number of responses per respondent Hours per response Total burden hours 5-Year average annual burden hours System-of-care Assessment Interview Guides A–I, L–R ........ Key site informants ................... 546 3 1.0 1,638 328 tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES Child and Family Outcome Study Caregiver Information Questionnaire (CIQ–IC). Caregiver Information Questionnaire Follow-up (CIQ–FC). Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ). Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)/ Child Behavior Checklist 11⁄2–5/6–18. Education Questionnaire—Revised (EQ–R). Living Situations Questionnaire (LSQ). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale–Second Edition, Parent Rating Scale (BERS– 2C). Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS). Parenting Stress Index (PSI) .... Deveraux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA). Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale—Second Edition, Parent Rating Scale (PBERS). Delinquency Survey—Revised (DS–R). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale—Second Edition, Youth Rating Scale (BERS– 2Y). Gain-Quick Substance Related Issues. Substance Use Survey—Revised (SUS–R). Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scales (RCMAS). Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale—Second Edition (RADS–2). Youth information Questionnaire—Baseline (YIQ–I). VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:48 Mar 17, 2009 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 1 0.4 2,032 406 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 4 0.3 6,280 1,256 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 5 0.2 4,627 925 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 5 0.3 9,226 1,845 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 5 0.3 9,226 1,845 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 5 0.1 2,300 460 Caregiver .................................. 4,931 5 0.2 4,117 823 Caregiver .................................. 4,931 5 0.1 2,046 409 Caregiver .................................. Caregiver .................................. 1,528 1,528 5 5 0.1 0.1 637 637 127 127 Caregiver .................................. 1,528 5 0.1 764 153 Youth ........................................ 3,452 5 0.1 2,301 460 Youth ........................................ 3,452 5 0.2 2,882 576 Youth ........................................ 3,452 5 0.1 1,433 287 Youth ........................................ 3,452 5 0.1 1,726 345 Youth ........................................ 3,452 5 0.1 863 173 Youth ........................................ 3,452 5 0.1 863 173 Youth ........................................ 3,452 1 0.3 863 173 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM 18MRN1 11595 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices Instrument Youth information Questionnaire—Follow-up (YIQ–F). Total average number of responses per respondent Number of respondents Respondent Youth ........................................ 3,452 Hours per response 5-Year average annual burden hours Total burden hours 4 0.3 3,452 690 Service Experience Study Multi-Sector Service Contacts— Revised—Intake (MSSC–R–I). Multi-Sector Service Contacts— Revised—Follow-up (MSSC– R–F). Cultural Competence and Service Provision Questionnaire— Revised (CCSP–R). Youth Services Survey—Family (YSS–F). Youth Services Survey (YSS) .. Caregiver .................................. 5,541 1 0.3 1,385 277 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 4 0.3 5,541 1,108 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 4 0.1 2,955 591 Caregiver .................................. 5,541 4 0.1 2,593 519 Youth ........................................ 3,452 4 0.1 1,146 229 Juvenile Justice Study Delinquency Survey—Revised—JJ Addendum (DS– R–JJ). Court Representative Questionnaire. Electronic Data Transfer of Juvenile Justice Records. Youth ........................................ 405 5 0.0 68 14 Court representatives ............... 212 5 0.2 177 35 Key site personnel .................... 212 5 0.0 35 7 Education Study Teacher Questionnaire ............. School Administrator Questionnaire. Electronic Data Transfer of Education Records. Teacher ..................................... School administrators ............... 212 212 5 5 0.3 0.2 265 177 53 35 Key site personnel .................... 212 5 0.0 35 7 Child Welfare Study Child Welfare Sector Study Questionnaire—Intake (CWSQ–I). Child Welfare Sector Study Questionnaire—Follow-up (CWSQ–F). Care coordinators ..................... 487 1 0.5 244 49 Care coordinators ..................... 487 4 0.5 974 195 Sustainability Study Sustainability Survey: Brief Form. Sustainability Survey ................ Sustainability Survey ................ Project Director ......................... 79 2 0.2 26 5 Providers ................................... Caregiver .................................. 180 60 2 2 0.8 0.8 270 90 54 18 CQI Effectiveness Evaluation CQI Baseline Survey, Webbased. CQI Monitoring Survey, Webbased. Local Focus Group Guide ........ National Focus Group Guide .... Key site personnel .................... 208 1 0.5 104 21 Key site personnel .................... 208 2 0.5 208 42 Key site personnel .................... National TA providers ............... 30 20 2 2 1.0 1.0 60 40 12 8 Alumni Networking Study tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES Networking and Collaboration Survey. Alumni Network Satisfaction Survey. Key site personnel .................... 236 4 0.5 472 94 Key site personnel, nat’l TA providers, Branch staff. 458 3 0.3 344 69 3 0.0 129 26 Services and Costs Study Flex Funds Data Dictionary/ Tool. VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:48 Mar 17, 2009 Local programming staff compiling/entering administrative data on children/youth. Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 1,306 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM 18MRN1 11596 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices Instrument Number of respondents Respondent Services and Costs Data DicLocal evaluator, staff at partner tionary/Data Entry Application. agencies, and programming staff compiling/entering service and cost records on children/youth. Total average number of responses per respondent 5,541 100 0.1 Number of responses/ respondent Number of respondents Respondent Hours per response 5-Year average annual burden hours Total burden hours 27,705 Average burden/ response 5,541 Total average annual burden Caregiver ......................................................................................................... Youth ................................................................................................................ Provider/Administrator ..................................................................................... 5,541 3,452 546 0.9 0.9 10.5 2.2 1.0 1.1 10,891 3,119 6,580 Total .......................................................................................................... 9,539 ........................ ........................ 20,591 Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, Room 7–1044, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail her a copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. March 11, 2009. Elaine Parry, Director, Office of Program Services. [FR Doc. E9–5803 Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4162–20–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R9–WSR–2009–N0056] [91400–5110– POLI–7B and 91400–9410–POLI–7B] Proposed Information Collection; OMB Control Number 1018–0109; Wildlife and Sport Fish Grants and Cooperative Agreements AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. SUMMARY: We (Fish and Wildlife Service) will ask the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve the information collection (IC) described below. As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and as part of our continuing efforts to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, we invite the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on this IC. This IC is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2009. We may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. DATES: Your comments must be received by May 18, 2009. ADDRESSES: Send your comments on the IC to Hope Grey, Information Collection Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife Service, MS 222–ARLSQ, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203 (mail); hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information about this IC, contact Hope Grey by mail or email (see ADDRESSES) or by telephone at (703) 358–2482. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract We administer 18 wildlife and sport fish financial assistance programs. We provide most of this financial assistance as grants, but cooperative agreements are possible if the Federal Government is substantially involved in carrying out the project. You can find a description of most programs in the Catalog of Domestic Federal Assistance (CDFA). For those programs without a CDFA number, see the authority. CDFA No. Authority Clean Vessel Act ............................................................................... Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act .......... Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund ..................... Everglades Restoration ..................................................................... 15.616 .......... 15.614 .......... 15.615 .......... None ............. Fisheries Restoration and Irrigation Mitigation ................................. Hunter Education and Safety ............................................................ Landowner Incentive ......................................................................... Multistate Conservation Grants ......................................................... National Outreach and Communication ............................................ Research Grants (Generic) ............................................................... tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES Program None ............. 15.626 .......... 15.633 .......... 15.628 .......... 15.653 .......... 15.650 .......... Service Training and Technical Assistance (Generic Training) ........ Sport Fish Restoration ...................................................................... Sportfishing and Boating Safety Act (Boating Infrastructure Grants) State Wildlife Grants ......................................................................... Tribal Landowner Incentive ............................................................... Tribal Wildlife Grants ......................................................................... Wildlife Conservation and Restoration .............................................. 15.649 15.605 15.622 15.634 15.638 15.639 15.625 16 U.S.C. 777g(c) ............................... 16 U.S.C. 3951–3956 ......................... 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ....................... Pub. L. 104–127; 16 U.S.C. 460 l–4 l–11. 16 U.S.C. 777 ..................................... 16 U.S.C. 669h–1 ............................... Pub. L. 110–5 ..................................... 16 U.S.C. 669h–2; 16 U.S.C. 777m ... 16 U.S.C. 777g(d) ............................... 16 U.S.C. 753a; 16 U.S.C. 460(l–4 l–11);16 U.S.C. 1531–1543. 16 U.S.C. 661 and 16 U.S.C. 742f ..... 16 U.S.C. 777–777n (except 777e–1) 16 U.S.C. 777g and g–1 ..................... Pub. L. 110–329 ................................. Pub. L. 110–5 ..................................... Pub. L. 110–329 ................................. 16 U.S.C. 669b and 669c ................... VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:48 Mar 17, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM 18MRN1 Implementing Regulations 50 CFR 85 50 CFR 84 50 CFR 81 None None 50 CFR 80 None None None None None 50 CFR 80 50 CFR 86 None None None None

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11593-11596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

    In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed 
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of 
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects 
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the 
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of 
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions 
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of information technology.
    Proposed Project: National Evaluation of the Comprehensive 
Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families 
Program: Phase VI--NEW.
    The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA), Center of Mental Health Services is responsible for the 
national evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health 
Services for Children and Their Families Program (Children's Mental 
Health Initiative--CMHI) that will collect data on child mental health 
outcomes, family life, and service system development and performance. 
Data will be collected on 26 service systems, and approximately 5,541 
children and families.
    Data collection for this evaluation will be conducted over a five-
year period. Child and family outcomes of interest will be collected at 
intake and during subsequent follow-up sessions at six-month intervals. 
The length of time that individual families will participate in the 
study ranges from 12 to 24 months depending upon when they enter the 
evaluation. The outcome measures include the following: Child 
symptomatology and functioning, family functioning, satisfaction, and 
caregiver strain. The core of service system data will be collected 
every 18-24 months throughout the 5-year evaluation period, with a 
sustainability survey conducted in years 3 and 5. Service utilization 
and cost data will be tracked and submitted to the national evaluation 
every six months using two tools: The Flex Fund Tool and the Services 
and Costs Data Tool to estimate average cost of treatment per child, 
distribution of costs, and allocation of costs across service 
categories. Service delivery and system variables of interest include 
the following: Maturity of system of care development in funded system 
of care communities, adherence to the system of care program model, and 
client service experience. We will also conduct a comprehensive 
evaluation of the CMHI's data driven technical assistance; this 
component of the evaluation will employ a mixed-methods approach, 
combining qualitative and quantitative data to provide a comprehensive 
assessment of the continuous quality improvement (CQI) process in 
funded system of care

[[Page 11594]]

communities. Specifically, data will be gathered through three 
complementary activities: A baseline survey of key constituents in all 
funded communities; a subsequent monitoring survey administered every 
two years to the same constituents; and biennial case studies of four 
selected communities.
    In addition, the evaluation will include three special studies: (1) 
The sector specific assessment and quasi-experimental comparison study 
will examine in more detail the outcomes and service experience of 
children from multiple child-serving sectors and, through child-level 
matching, compare these outcomes with those not receiving system of 
care services; (2) The Alumni Network Study will examine the 
effectiveness of the system of care Alumni Network Web site by 
evaluating end-user satisfaction and usability of the Web site and will 
also assess the collaboration between communities via a Web-based 
Networking and Collaboration Survey that will measure the nature and 
extent of the interaction between communities; (3) The Study of State 
Strategies for Sustainability will examine the State's role in 
sustaining communities after Federal funding ceases and describe 
effective strategies for sustaining funded systems of care. A short 
version of the sustainability survey developed for this evaluation will 
be used to gather this information.
    Internet-based technology such as Web-based surveys and data entry 
and management tools will be used in this evaluation. The measures of 
the national evaluation address the national outcome measures for 
mental health programs as currently established by SAMHSA.
    The average annual respondent burden is estimated below. The 
estimate reflects the average number of respondents in each respondent 
category, the average number of responses per respondent per year, the 
average length of time it will take to complete each response, and the 
total average annual burden for each category of respondent, and for 
all categories of respondents combined.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                                5-Year
                                                                                                    Total average                  Total       average
                  Instrument                                Respondent                Number of       number of     Hours per      burden       annual
                                                                                     respondents    responses per    response      hours        burden
                                                                                                     respondent                                 hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                System-of-care Assessment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interview Guides A-I, L-R.....................  Key site informants..............             546               3          1.0        1,638          328
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Child and Family Outcome Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Caregiver Information Questionnaire (CIQ-IC)..  Caregiver........................           5,541               1          0.4        2,032          406
Caregiver Information Questionnaire Follow-up   Caregiver........................           5,541               4          0.3        6,280        1,256
 (CIQ-FC).
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ).........  Caregiver........................           5,541               5          0.2        4,627          925
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)/ Child          Caregiver........................           5,541               5          0.3        9,226        1,845
 Behavior Checklist 1\1/2\-5/6-18.
Education Questionnaire--Revised (EQ-R).......  Caregiver........................           5,541               5          0.3        9,226        1,845
Living Situations Questionnaire (LSQ).........  Caregiver........................           5,541               5          0.1        2,300          460
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale-Second    Caregiver........................           4,931               5          0.2        4,117          823
 Edition, Parent Rating Scale (BERS-2C).
Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS)...............  Caregiver........................           4,931               5          0.1        2,046          409
Parenting Stress Index (PSI)..................  Caregiver........................           1,528               5          0.1          637          127
Deveraux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA)....  Caregiver........................           1,528               5          0.1          637          127
Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating       Caregiver........................           1,528               5          0.1          764          153
 Scale--Second Edition, Parent Rating Scale
 (PBERS).
Delinquency Survey--Revised (DS-R)............  Youth............................           3,452               5          0.1        2,301          460
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale--Second   Youth............................           3,452               5          0.2        2,882          576
 Edition, Youth Rating Scale (BERS-2Y).
Gain-Quick Substance Related Issues...........  Youth............................           3,452               5          0.1        1,433          287
Substance Use Survey--Revised (SUS-R).........  Youth............................           3,452               5          0.1        1,726          345
Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scales      Youth............................           3,452               5          0.1          863          173
 (RCMAS).
Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale--Second    Youth............................           3,452               5          0.1          863          173
 Edition (RADS-2).
Youth information Questionnaire--Baseline (YIQ- Youth............................           3,452               1          0.3          863          173
 I).

[[Page 11595]]

 
Youth information Questionnaire--Follow-up      Youth............................           3,452               4          0.3        3,452          690
 (YIQ-F).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Service Experience Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multi-Sector Service Contacts--Revised--Intake  Caregiver........................           5,541               1          0.3        1,385          277
 (MSSC-R-I).
Multi-Sector Service Contacts--Revised--Follow- Caregiver........................           5,541               4          0.3        5,541        1,108
 up (MSSC-R-F).
Cultural Competence and Service Provision       Caregiver........................           5,541               4          0.1        2,955          591
 Questionnaire--Revised (CCSP-R).
Youth Services Survey--Family (YSS-F).........  Caregiver........................           5,541               4          0.1        2,593          519
Youth Services Survey (YSS)...................  Youth............................           3,452               4          0.1        1,146          229
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Juvenile Justice Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delinquency Survey--Revised--JJ Addendum (DS-R- Youth............................             405               5          0.0           68           14
 JJ).
Court Representative Questionnaire............  Court representatives............             212               5          0.2          177           35
Electronic Data Transfer of Juvenile Justice    Key site personnel...............             212               5          0.0           35            7
 Records.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Education Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teacher Questionnaire.........................  Teacher..........................             212               5          0.3          265           53
School Administrator Questionnaire............  School administrators............             212               5          0.2          177           35
Electronic Data Transfer of Education Records.  Key site personnel...............             212               5          0.0           35            7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Child Welfare Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Child Welfare Sector Study Questionnaire--      Care coordinators................             487               1          0.5          244           49
 Intake (CWSQ-I).
Child Welfare Sector Study Questionnaire--      Care coordinators................             487               4          0.5          974          195
 Follow-up (CWSQ-F).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Sustainability Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustainability Survey: Brief Form.............  Project Director.................              79               2          0.2           26            5
Sustainability Survey.........................  Providers........................             180               2          0.8          270           54
Sustainability Survey.........................  Caregiver........................              60               2          0.8           90           18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               CQI Effectiveness Evaluation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CQI Baseline Survey, Web-based................  Key site personnel...............             208               1          0.5          104           21
CQI Monitoring Survey, Web-based..............  Key site personnel...............             208               2          0.5          208           42
Local Focus Group Guide.......................  Key site personnel...............              30               2          1.0           60           12
National Focus Group Guide....................  National TA providers............              20               2          1.0           40            8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Alumni Networking Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Networking and Collaboration Survey...........  Key site personnel...............             236               4          0.5          472           94
Alumni Network Satisfaction Survey............  Key site personnel, nat'l TA                  458               3          0.3          344           69
                                                 providers, Branch staff.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Services and Costs Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flex Funds Data Dictionary/Tool...............  Local programming staff compiling/          1,306               3          0.0          129           26
                                                 entering administrative data on
                                                 children/youth.

[[Page 11596]]

 
Services and Costs Data Dictionary/Data Entry   Local evaluator, staff at partner           5,541             100          0.1       27,705        5,541
 Application.                                    agencies, and programming staff
                                                 compiling/entering service and
                                                 cost records on children/youth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of
                   Respondent                        Number of      responses/    Average burden/  Total average
                                                    respondents     respondent        response     annual burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Caregiver.......................................           5,541             0.9             2.2          10,891
Youth...........................................           3,452             0.9             1.0           3,119
Provider/Administrator..........................             546            10.5             1.1           6,580
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................           9,539  ..............  ..............          20,591
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 
Room 7-1044, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail her 
a copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be 
received within 60 days of this notice.

    March 11, 2009.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E9-5803 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.