Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 11593-11596 [E9-5803]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices
IV. List of Recognized Standards
FDA maintains the agency’s current
list of FDA recognized consensus
standards in a searchable database that
may be accessed directly at FDA’s
Internet site at https://
www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/
cfdocs/cfStandards/search.cfm. FDA
will incorporate the modifications and
minor revisions described in this
document into the database and, upon
publication in the Federal Register, this
recognition of consensus standards will
be effective. FDA will announce
additional modifications and minor
revisions to the list of recognized
consensus standards, as needed, in the
Federal Register once a year, or more
often, if necessary.
V. Recommendation of Standards for
Recognition by FDA
Any person may recommend
consensus standards as candidates for
recognition under the new provision of
section 514 of the act by submitting
such recommendations, with reasons for
the recommendation, to the contact
person (See FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). To be properly considered
such recommendations should contain,
at a minimum, the following
information: (1) Title of the standard; (2)
any reference number and date; (3)
name and address of the national or
international standards development
organization; (4) a proposed list of
devices for which a declaration of
conformity to this standard should
routinely apply; and (5) a brief
identification of the testing or
performance or other characteristics of
the device(s) that would be addressed
by a declaration of conformity.
tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
VI. Electronic Access
You may obtain a copy of ‘‘Guidance
on the Recognition and Use of
Consensus Standards’’ by using the
Internet. CDRH maintains a site on the
Internet for easy access to information
including text, graphics, and files that
you may download to a personal
computer with access to the Internet.
Updated on a regular basis, the CDRH
home page includes the guidance as
well as the current list of recognized
standards and other standards related
documents. After publication in the
Federal Register, this document
announcing ‘‘Modification to the List of
Recognized Standards, Recognition List
Number: 021’’ will be available on the
CDRH home page. You may access the
CDRH home page at https://www.fda.gov/
cdrh.
You may access ‘‘Guidance on the
Recognition and Use of Consensus
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:48 Mar 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
Standards,’’ and the searchable database
for ‘‘FDA Recognized Consensus
Standards’’ through the hyperlink at
https://www.fda.gov/cdrh/stdsprog.html.
This Federal Register document on
modifications in FDA’s recognition of
consensus standards is available at
https://www.fda.gov/cdrh/fedregin.html.
VII. Submission of Comments and
Effective Date
Interested persons may submit to the
contact person (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) written or
electronic comments regarding this
document. Two copies of any mailed
comments are to be submitted, except
that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. FDA will consider any
comments received in determining
whether to amend the current listing of
modifications to the list of recognized
standards, Recognition List Number:
021. These modifications to the list or
recognized standards are effective upon
publication of this document in the
Federal Register.
Dated: March 10, 2009.
Daniel G. Schultz,
Director, Center for Devices and Radiological
Health.
[FR Doc. E9–5858 Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11593
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: National Evaluation
of the Comprehensive Community
Mental Health Services for Children and
Their Families Program: Phase VI—
NEW.
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), Center of Mental Health
Services is responsible for the national
evaluation of the Comprehensive
Community Mental Health Services for
Children and Their Families Program
(Children’s Mental Health Initiative—
CMHI) that will collect data on child
mental health outcomes, family life, and
service system development and
performance. Data will be collected on
26 service systems, and approximately
5,541 children and families.
Data collection for this evaluation will
be conducted over a five-year period.
Child and family outcomes of interest
will be collected at intake and during
subsequent follow-up sessions at sixmonth intervals. The length of time that
individual families will participate in
the study ranges from 12 to 24 months
depending upon when they enter the
evaluation. The outcome measures
include the following: Child
symptomatology and functioning,
family functioning, satisfaction, and
caregiver strain. The core of service
system data will be collected every 18–
24 months throughout the 5-year
evaluation period, with a sustainability
survey conducted in years 3 and 5.
Service utilization and cost data will be
tracked and submitted to the national
evaluation every six months using two
tools: The Flex Fund Tool and the
Services and Costs Data Tool to estimate
average cost of treatment per child,
distribution of costs, and allocation of
costs across service categories. Service
delivery and system variables of interest
include the following: Maturity of
system of care development in funded
system of care communities, adherence
to the system of care program model,
and client service experience. We will
also conduct a comprehensive
evaluation of the CMHI’s data driven
technical assistance; this component of
the evaluation will employ a mixedmethods approach, combining
qualitative and quantitative data to
provide a comprehensive assessment of
the continuous quality improvement
(CQI) process in funded system of care
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
11594
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices
communities. Specifically, data will be
gathered through three complementary
activities: A baseline survey of key
constituents in all funded communities;
a subsequent monitoring survey
administered every two years to the
same constituents; and biennial case
studies of four selected communities.
In addition, the evaluation will
include three special studies: (1) The
sector specific assessment and quasiexperimental comparison study will
examine in more detail the outcomes
and service experience of children from
multiple child-serving sectors and,
through child-level matching, compare
these outcomes with those not receiving
system of care services; (2) The Alumni
Instrument
Network Study will examine the
effectiveness of the system of care
Alumni Network Web site by evaluating
end-user satisfaction and usability of the
Web site and will also assess the
collaboration between communities via
a Web-based Networking and
Collaboration Survey that will measure
the nature and extent of the interaction
between communities; (3) The Study of
State Strategies for Sustainability will
examine the State’s role in sustaining
communities after Federal funding
ceases and describe effective strategies
for sustaining funded systems of care. A
short version of the sustainability
survey developed for this evaluation
will be used to gather this information.
Number of
respondents
Respondent
Internet-based technology such as
Web-based surveys and data entry and
management tools will be used in this
evaluation. The measures of the national
evaluation address the national outcome
measures for mental health programs as
currently established by SAMHSA.
The average annual respondent
burden is estimated below. The estimate
reflects the average number of
respondents in each respondent
category, the average number of
responses per respondent per year, the
average length of time it will take to
complete each response, and the total
average annual burden for each category
of respondent, and for all categories of
respondents combined.
Total average
number of
responses per
respondent
Hours per
response
Total
burden
hours
5-Year
average
annual burden hours
System-of-care Assessment
Interview Guides A–I, L–R ........
Key site informants ...................
546
3
1.0
1,638
328
tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Child and Family Outcome Study
Caregiver Information Questionnaire (CIQ–IC).
Caregiver Information Questionnaire Follow-up (CIQ–FC).
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire
(CGSQ).
Child Behavior Checklist
(CBCL)/ Child Behavior
Checklist 11⁄2–5/6–18.
Education Questionnaire—Revised (EQ–R).
Living Situations Questionnaire
(LSQ).
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale–Second Edition,
Parent Rating Scale (BERS–
2C).
Columbia Impairment Scale
(CIS).
Parenting Stress Index (PSI) ....
Deveraux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA).
Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale—Second
Edition, Parent Rating Scale
(PBERS).
Delinquency Survey—Revised
(DS–R).
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale—Second Edition,
Youth Rating Scale (BERS–
2Y).
Gain-Quick Substance Related
Issues.
Substance Use Survey—Revised (SUS–R).
Revised Children’s Manifest
Anxiety Scales (RCMAS).
Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale—Second Edition
(RADS–2).
Youth information Questionnaire—Baseline (YIQ–I).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:48 Mar 17, 2009
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
1
0.4
2,032
406
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
4
0.3
6,280
1,256
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
5
0.2
4,627
925
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
5
0.3
9,226
1,845
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
5
0.3
9,226
1,845
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
5
0.1
2,300
460
Caregiver ..................................
4,931
5
0.2
4,117
823
Caregiver ..................................
4,931
5
0.1
2,046
409
Caregiver ..................................
Caregiver ..................................
1,528
1,528
5
5
0.1
0.1
637
637
127
127
Caregiver ..................................
1,528
5
0.1
764
153
Youth ........................................
3,452
5
0.1
2,301
460
Youth ........................................
3,452
5
0.2
2,882
576
Youth ........................................
3,452
5
0.1
1,433
287
Youth ........................................
3,452
5
0.1
1,726
345
Youth ........................................
3,452
5
0.1
863
173
Youth ........................................
3,452
5
0.1
863
173
Youth ........................................
3,452
1
0.3
863
173
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
11595
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices
Instrument
Youth information Questionnaire—Follow-up (YIQ–F).
Total average
number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Respondent
Youth ........................................
3,452
Hours per
response
5-Year
average
annual burden hours
Total
burden
hours
4
0.3
3,452
690
Service Experience Study
Multi-Sector Service Contacts—
Revised—Intake (MSSC–R–I).
Multi-Sector Service Contacts—
Revised—Follow-up (MSSC–
R–F).
Cultural Competence and Service Provision Questionnaire—
Revised (CCSP–R).
Youth Services Survey—Family
(YSS–F).
Youth Services Survey (YSS) ..
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
1
0.3
1,385
277
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
4
0.3
5,541
1,108
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
4
0.1
2,955
591
Caregiver ..................................
5,541
4
0.1
2,593
519
Youth ........................................
3,452
4
0.1
1,146
229
Juvenile Justice Study
Delinquency Survey—Revised—JJ Addendum (DS–
R–JJ).
Court Representative Questionnaire.
Electronic Data Transfer of Juvenile Justice Records.
Youth ........................................
405
5
0.0
68
14
Court representatives ...............
212
5
0.2
177
35
Key site personnel ....................
212
5
0.0
35
7
Education Study
Teacher Questionnaire .............
School Administrator Questionnaire.
Electronic Data Transfer of
Education Records.
Teacher .....................................
School administrators ...............
212
212
5
5
0.3
0.2
265
177
53
35
Key site personnel ....................
212
5
0.0
35
7
Child Welfare Study
Child Welfare Sector Study
Questionnaire—Intake
(CWSQ–I).
Child Welfare Sector Study
Questionnaire—Follow-up
(CWSQ–F).
Care coordinators .....................
487
1
0.5
244
49
Care coordinators .....................
487
4
0.5
974
195
Sustainability Study
Sustainability Survey: Brief
Form.
Sustainability Survey ................
Sustainability Survey ................
Project Director .........................
79
2
0.2
26
5
Providers ...................................
Caregiver ..................................
180
60
2
2
0.8
0.8
270
90
54
18
CQI Effectiveness Evaluation
CQI Baseline Survey, Webbased.
CQI Monitoring Survey, Webbased.
Local Focus Group Guide ........
National Focus Group Guide ....
Key site personnel ....................
208
1
0.5
104
21
Key site personnel ....................
208
2
0.5
208
42
Key site personnel ....................
National TA providers ...............
30
20
2
2
1.0
1.0
60
40
12
8
Alumni Networking Study
tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Networking and Collaboration
Survey.
Alumni Network Satisfaction
Survey.
Key site personnel ....................
236
4
0.5
472
94
Key site personnel, nat’l TA
providers, Branch staff.
458
3
0.3
344
69
3
0.0
129
26
Services and Costs Study
Flex Funds Data Dictionary/
Tool.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:48 Mar 17, 2009
Local programming staff compiling/entering administrative
data on children/youth.
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
1,306
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
11596
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 51 / Wednesday, March 18, 2009 / Notices
Instrument
Number of
respondents
Respondent
Services and Costs Data DicLocal evaluator, staff at partner
tionary/Data Entry Application.
agencies, and programming
staff compiling/entering service and cost records on children/youth.
Total average
number of
responses per
respondent
5,541
100
0.1
Number of
responses/
respondent
Number of
respondents
Respondent
Hours per
response
5-Year
average
annual burden hours
Total
burden
hours
27,705
Average
burden/
response
5,541
Total average
annual burden
Caregiver .........................................................................................................
Youth ................................................................................................................
Provider/Administrator .....................................................................................
5,541
3,452
546
0.9
0.9
10.5
2.2
1.0
1.1
10,891
3,119
6,580
Total ..........................................................................................................
9,539
........................
........................
20,591
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 7–1044, One Choke Cherry Road,
Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail her a
copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
March 11, 2009.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E9–5803 Filed 3–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R9–WSR–2009–N0056] [91400–5110–
POLI–7B and 91400–9410–POLI–7B]
Proposed Information Collection; OMB
Control Number 1018–0109; Wildlife
and Sport Fish Grants and Cooperative
Agreements
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION:
Notice; request for comments.
SUMMARY: We (Fish and Wildlife
Service) will ask the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve the information collection (IC)
described below. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
as part of our continuing efforts to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, we invite the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this IC. This
IC is scheduled to expire on June 30,
2009. We may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: Your comments must be received
by May 18, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on the
IC to Hope Grey, Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Fish and Wildlife
Service, MS 222–ARLSQ, 4401 North
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203
(mail); hope_grey@fws.gov (e-mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this IC, contact Hope Grey by mail or email (see ADDRESSES) or by telephone
at (703) 358–2482.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
We administer 18 wildlife and sport
fish financial assistance programs. We
provide most of this financial assistance
as grants, but cooperative agreements
are possible if the Federal Government
is substantially involved in carrying out
the project. You can find a description
of most programs in the Catalog of
Domestic Federal Assistance (CDFA).
For those programs without a CDFA
number, see the authority.
CDFA No.
Authority
Clean Vessel Act ...............................................................................
Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act ..........
Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund .....................
Everglades Restoration .....................................................................
15.616 ..........
15.614 ..........
15.615 ..........
None .............
Fisheries Restoration and Irrigation Mitigation .................................
Hunter Education and Safety ............................................................
Landowner Incentive .........................................................................
Multistate Conservation Grants .........................................................
National Outreach and Communication ............................................
Research Grants (Generic) ...............................................................
tjames on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Program
None .............
15.626 ..........
15.633 ..........
15.628 ..........
15.653 ..........
15.650 ..........
Service Training and Technical Assistance (Generic Training) ........
Sport Fish Restoration ......................................................................
Sportfishing and Boating Safety Act (Boating Infrastructure Grants)
State Wildlife Grants .........................................................................
Tribal Landowner Incentive ...............................................................
Tribal Wildlife Grants .........................................................................
Wildlife Conservation and Restoration ..............................................
15.649
15.605
15.622
15.634
15.638
15.639
15.625
16 U.S.C. 777g(c) ...............................
16 U.S.C. 3951–3956 .........................
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. .......................
Pub. L. 104–127; 16 U.S.C. 460 l–4 l–11.
16 U.S.C. 777 .....................................
16 U.S.C. 669h–1 ...............................
Pub. L. 110–5 .....................................
16 U.S.C. 669h–2; 16 U.S.C. 777m ...
16 U.S.C. 777g(d) ...............................
16 U.S.C. 753a; 16 U.S.C. 460(l–4 l–11);16 U.S.C. 1531–1543.
16 U.S.C. 661 and 16 U.S.C. 742f .....
16 U.S.C. 777–777n (except 777e–1)
16 U.S.C. 777g and g–1 .....................
Pub. L. 110–329 .................................
Pub. L. 110–5 .....................................
Pub. L. 110–329 .................................
16 U.S.C. 669b and 669c ...................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:48 Mar 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Implementing
Regulations
50 CFR 85
50 CFR 84
50 CFR 81
None
None
50 CFR 80
None
None
None
None
None
50 CFR 80
50 CFR 86
None
None
None
None
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11593-11596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5803]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: National Evaluation of the Comprehensive
Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families
Program: Phase VI--NEW.
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), Center of Mental Health Services is responsible for the
national evaluation of the Comprehensive Community Mental Health
Services for Children and Their Families Program (Children's Mental
Health Initiative--CMHI) that will collect data on child mental health
outcomes, family life, and service system development and performance.
Data will be collected on 26 service systems, and approximately 5,541
children and families.
Data collection for this evaluation will be conducted over a five-
year period. Child and family outcomes of interest will be collected at
intake and during subsequent follow-up sessions at six-month intervals.
The length of time that individual families will participate in the
study ranges from 12 to 24 months depending upon when they enter the
evaluation. The outcome measures include the following: Child
symptomatology and functioning, family functioning, satisfaction, and
caregiver strain. The core of service system data will be collected
every 18-24 months throughout the 5-year evaluation period, with a
sustainability survey conducted in years 3 and 5. Service utilization
and cost data will be tracked and submitted to the national evaluation
every six months using two tools: The Flex Fund Tool and the Services
and Costs Data Tool to estimate average cost of treatment per child,
distribution of costs, and allocation of costs across service
categories. Service delivery and system variables of interest include
the following: Maturity of system of care development in funded system
of care communities, adherence to the system of care program model, and
client service experience. We will also conduct a comprehensive
evaluation of the CMHI's data driven technical assistance; this
component of the evaluation will employ a mixed-methods approach,
combining qualitative and quantitative data to provide a comprehensive
assessment of the continuous quality improvement (CQI) process in
funded system of care
[[Page 11594]]
communities. Specifically, data will be gathered through three
complementary activities: A baseline survey of key constituents in all
funded communities; a subsequent monitoring survey administered every
two years to the same constituents; and biennial case studies of four
selected communities.
In addition, the evaluation will include three special studies: (1)
The sector specific assessment and quasi-experimental comparison study
will examine in more detail the outcomes and service experience of
children from multiple child-serving sectors and, through child-level
matching, compare these outcomes with those not receiving system of
care services; (2) The Alumni Network Study will examine the
effectiveness of the system of care Alumni Network Web site by
evaluating end-user satisfaction and usability of the Web site and will
also assess the collaboration between communities via a Web-based
Networking and Collaboration Survey that will measure the nature and
extent of the interaction between communities; (3) The Study of State
Strategies for Sustainability will examine the State's role in
sustaining communities after Federal funding ceases and describe
effective strategies for sustaining funded systems of care. A short
version of the sustainability survey developed for this evaluation will
be used to gather this information.
Internet-based technology such as Web-based surveys and data entry
and management tools will be used in this evaluation. The measures of
the national evaluation address the national outcome measures for
mental health programs as currently established by SAMHSA.
The average annual respondent burden is estimated below. The
estimate reflects the average number of respondents in each respondent
category, the average number of responses per respondent per year, the
average length of time it will take to complete each response, and the
total average annual burden for each category of respondent, and for
all categories of respondents combined.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5-Year
Total average Total average
Instrument Respondent Number of number of Hours per burden annual
respondents responses per response hours burden
respondent hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
System-of-care Assessment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interview Guides A-I, L-R..................... Key site informants.............. 546 3 1.0 1,638 328
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Child and Family Outcome Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Caregiver Information Questionnaire (CIQ-IC).. Caregiver........................ 5,541 1 0.4 2,032 406
Caregiver Information Questionnaire Follow-up Caregiver........................ 5,541 4 0.3 6,280 1,256
(CIQ-FC).
Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ)......... Caregiver........................ 5,541 5 0.2 4,627 925
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)/ Child Caregiver........................ 5,541 5 0.3 9,226 1,845
Behavior Checklist 1\1/2\-5/6-18.
Education Questionnaire--Revised (EQ-R)....... Caregiver........................ 5,541 5 0.3 9,226 1,845
Living Situations Questionnaire (LSQ)......... Caregiver........................ 5,541 5 0.1 2,300 460
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale-Second Caregiver........................ 4,931 5 0.2 4,117 823
Edition, Parent Rating Scale (BERS-2C).
Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS)............... Caregiver........................ 4,931 5 0.1 2,046 409
Parenting Stress Index (PSI).................. Caregiver........................ 1,528 5 0.1 637 127
Deveraux Early Childhood Assessment (DECA).... Caregiver........................ 1,528 5 0.1 637 127
Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Caregiver........................ 1,528 5 0.1 764 153
Scale--Second Edition, Parent Rating Scale
(PBERS).
Delinquency Survey--Revised (DS-R)............ Youth............................ 3,452 5 0.1 2,301 460
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale--Second Youth............................ 3,452 5 0.2 2,882 576
Edition, Youth Rating Scale (BERS-2Y).
Gain-Quick Substance Related Issues........... Youth............................ 3,452 5 0.1 1,433 287
Substance Use Survey--Revised (SUS-R)......... Youth............................ 3,452 5 0.1 1,726 345
Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scales Youth............................ 3,452 5 0.1 863 173
(RCMAS).
Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale--Second Youth............................ 3,452 5 0.1 863 173
Edition (RADS-2).
Youth information Questionnaire--Baseline (YIQ- Youth............................ 3,452 1 0.3 863 173
I).
[[Page 11595]]
Youth information Questionnaire--Follow-up Youth............................ 3,452 4 0.3 3,452 690
(YIQ-F).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Experience Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multi-Sector Service Contacts--Revised--Intake Caregiver........................ 5,541 1 0.3 1,385 277
(MSSC-R-I).
Multi-Sector Service Contacts--Revised--Follow- Caregiver........................ 5,541 4 0.3 5,541 1,108
up (MSSC-R-F).
Cultural Competence and Service Provision Caregiver........................ 5,541 4 0.1 2,955 591
Questionnaire--Revised (CCSP-R).
Youth Services Survey--Family (YSS-F)......... Caregiver........................ 5,541 4 0.1 2,593 519
Youth Services Survey (YSS)................... Youth............................ 3,452 4 0.1 1,146 229
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Juvenile Justice Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delinquency Survey--Revised--JJ Addendum (DS-R- Youth............................ 405 5 0.0 68 14
JJ).
Court Representative Questionnaire............ Court representatives............ 212 5 0.2 177 35
Electronic Data Transfer of Juvenile Justice Key site personnel............... 212 5 0.0 35 7
Records.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Education Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teacher Questionnaire......................... Teacher.......................... 212 5 0.3 265 53
School Administrator Questionnaire............ School administrators............ 212 5 0.2 177 35
Electronic Data Transfer of Education Records. Key site personnel............... 212 5 0.0 35 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Child Welfare Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Child Welfare Sector Study Questionnaire-- Care coordinators................ 487 1 0.5 244 49
Intake (CWSQ-I).
Child Welfare Sector Study Questionnaire-- Care coordinators................ 487 4 0.5 974 195
Follow-up (CWSQ-F).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustainability Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustainability Survey: Brief Form............. Project Director................. 79 2 0.2 26 5
Sustainability Survey......................... Providers........................ 180 2 0.8 270 54
Sustainability Survey......................... Caregiver........................ 60 2 0.8 90 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CQI Effectiveness Evaluation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CQI Baseline Survey, Web-based................ Key site personnel............... 208 1 0.5 104 21
CQI Monitoring Survey, Web-based.............. Key site personnel............... 208 2 0.5 208 42
Local Focus Group Guide....................... Key site personnel............... 30 2 1.0 60 12
National Focus Group Guide.................... National TA providers............ 20 2 1.0 40 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alumni Networking Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Networking and Collaboration Survey........... Key site personnel............... 236 4 0.5 472 94
Alumni Network Satisfaction Survey............ Key site personnel, nat'l TA 458 3 0.3 344 69
providers, Branch staff.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Services and Costs Study
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flex Funds Data Dictionary/Tool............... Local programming staff compiling/ 1,306 3 0.0 129 26
entering administrative data on
children/youth.
[[Page 11596]]
Services and Costs Data Dictionary/Data Entry Local evaluator, staff at partner 5,541 100 0.1 27,705 5,541
Application. agencies, and programming staff
compiling/entering service and
cost records on children/youth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Respondent Number of responses/ Average burden/ Total average
respondents respondent response annual burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Caregiver....................................... 5,541 0.9 2.2 10,891
Youth........................................... 3,452 0.9 1.0 3,119
Provider/Administrator.......................... 546 10.5 1.1 6,580
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 9,539 .............. .............. 20,591
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 7-1044, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail her
a copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be
received within 60 days of this notice.
March 11, 2009.
Elaine Parry,
Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E9-5803 Filed 3-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
