Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Alternext US LLC.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Revise Listing Fees, 11392-11393 [E9-5718]
Download as PDF
11392
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 17, 2009 / Notices
pay less than would currently be the
case under Section 902.09. Similarly, all
issuers will be subject to lower annual
fees, as the proposed flat rate of $5,000
is less than the current minimum of
$10,000 charged under Section 902.09.
The Commission notes that the
Exchange represents that, since it added
securities listed under Sections 703.21
and 703.22 and traded on NYSE Bonds
to Section 902.09 of the Manual,10 the
Exchange has not listed any such
securities, and therefore no issuers have
been charged those higher fees.11 The
Commission also notes that the
Exchange has stated that it incurs lower
regulatory and administrative costs in
connection with such securities and that
the proposed fees are set at a level that
reflects these lower costs. Therefore, the
Commission expects that the reduced
fees should not affect the Exchange’s
ability to finance its regulatory
activities. Based on the above, the
Commission believes the proposed fee
changes meet the statutory standards 12
that exchange rules provide for an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among issuers,
and do not unfairly discriminate
between issuers.
For the reasons set forth above, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2009–
03) be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–5717 Filed 3–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–59560; File No. SR–
NYSEALTR–2009–02]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Alternext US LLC.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change To Revise
Listing Fees
March 11, 2009.
I. Introduction
On January 8, 2009, NYSE Alternext
US LLC (‘‘NYSE Alternext’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
revise its listing fees. The proposed rule
change was published in the Federal
Register on February 4, 2009.3 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes amending its
initial listing fees for common stock or
common stock equivalents. The initial
listing fees set forth in Section 140 of
the Exchange’s Company Guide for
issuances of (i) less than five million
shares would be increased from $40,000
to $50,000, (ii) five million to 10 million
shares would be increased from $50,000
to $55,000, (iii) 10,000,001 shares to 15
million shares would be increased from
$55,000 to $60,000 and (iv) in excess of
15 million shares would be increased
from $65,000 to $70,000. The Exchange
further proposes eliminating its $5,000
application fee in connection with a
company’s initial listing on the
Exchange.4
The Exchange also proposes
eliminating the $5,000 application
processing fee in Section 140, payable
in connection with the initial listing of
a class of bonds of an issuer that does
not have another class of securities
listed on the Exchange. Additionally,
Section 140 currently provides that, in
the case of non-U.S. issuers listed on
foreign stock exchanges, the fee,
including the one-time, non-refundable
application-processing fee of $5,000, is
$40,000. The Exchange proposes to
10 See
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
supra note 4.
e-mail from John Carey, Chief Counsel—
U.S. Equities, NYSE, to Sara Hawkins, Special
Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets,
Commission, dated March 9, 2009.
12 See Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act, 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and 78f(b)(5).
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
11 See
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:44 Mar 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59304
(January 27, 2009), 74 FR 6077 (February 4, 2009)
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘Notice’’).
4 The Exchange proposes to make conforming
changes to Section 144 of the Company Guide to
eliminate references to the application processing
fee.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
conform the initial listing fees charged
to non-U.S. companies to those charged
to domestic companies.
Effective January 1, 2010, the
Exchange proposes to increase the
annual fee for issuers that have between
50,000,001 and 75 million shares
outstanding from $32,500 to $36,500
and for issuers with an excess of 75
million shares outstanding the annual
fee would be raised from $34,000 to
$40,000.5 Moreover, as of the date of
approval of this rule filing, issuers
would be required to pay a
supplemental annual fee equal to the
difference between the amount they
would pay in 2009 based on the current
annual fee rates and the amount they
would be required to pay if the 2010
annual fee rates were in place on
January 1, 2009.
The Exchange further proposes
eliminating Section 146 in its entirety
and the provisions in Sections 140 and
142(g) that grants the Board of Directors
of the Exchange the discretion to defer,
waive or rebate all or any part of the
initial listing fee payable in connection
with any listing of securities or
additional shares. The Exchange also
proposes amending Section 142 of the
Company Guide by (i) increasing from
$60,000 to $65,000 the maximum fee
per issuer for listing additional shares in
a calendar year and (ii) increasing from
$2,000 to $2,500 the fee charged in
connection with a company changing its
name or ticker symbol.
The Exchange also proposes to adopt
a fee of $7,500 for technical original
listings (‘‘Technical Original Listings’’)
and reverse stock splits. The Exchange
would apply the proposed $7,500
application fee for a Technical Original
Listing if the change in the company’s
status is technical in nature and the
shareholders of the original company
receive or retain a share-for-share
interest in the new company without
any change in their equity position or
rights.6 The $7,500 application fee
would also apply to reverse stock splits.
The Technical Original Listing fee will
replace the current $5,000 fee for
‘‘substitution listings’’ set forth in
Section 142(d). The Technical Original
Listing fee is intended to apply only to
those events that would have previously
5 The Exchange proposes to retain the minimum
annual fee of $27,500 for issuers with 50 million
shares or less outstanding. Therefore, issuers with
50 million shares or less outstanding will not be
subject to any annual fee increase for 2009.
6 Minor technical amendments are being made to
Rule 142(e) to reflect the fact that reincorporation
will be explicitly included in the categories of
events subject to the proposed Technical Original
Listing fee.
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 17, 2009 / Notices
been subject to the substitution listing
fee.
Finally, the Exchange is amending the
language of Section 142 to state that the
fees in the section apply to non-U.S.
companies. According to the Exchange,
they have always applied the fees in
Section 142 to non-U.S. companies, and
therefore, this amendment clarifies the
Exchange’s policy.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
III. Discussion and Commission’s
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange. Specifically, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,7 which requires, among other
things, that the rules of an exchange
provide for equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and issuers and
other persons using its facilities.
As discussed in the Notice, many of
the Exchange’s proposed fees, such as
the initial listing fees for common stock
or common stock equivalents, the
maximum fee per issuer for listing
additional shares in a calendar year, the
fee charged in connection with a
company changing its name or ticker
symbol, and the Technical Original
Listing fees are competitive with or
substantially similar to the fees already
in place at Nasdaq.8 The Commission
recognizes that competition for listings
is becoming increasingly vigorous, and
that such competition may help to
ensure the reasonableness of fees among
the markets vying for new listings.9
Moreover, as described in the Notice,
the Exchange represented that it had
increased services to listed companies
and incurred increased costs for services
and regulatory programs, which
required changes to its listing fees.10
The Exchange also cited different levels
of services based on the number of
outstanding shares to support the higher
fees generally paid to the Exchange by
larger companies and to provide
justification for the proposed increases.
Accordingly, the Commission believes
that the Exchange’s proposed fee
increases are reasonable, given the
current competitive landscape, the
listing fees charged by Nasdaq, the
services the Exchange offers issuers that
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
Notice, supra note 3.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55202
(January 30, 2007), 72 FR 6017 (February 8, 2007).
10 See Notice, supra note 3. Additionally, some
costs were offset by the elimination of the $5,000
application fee.
8 See
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:44 Mar 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
choose to list with NYSE Alternext and
the increased regulatory oversight costs
noted by the Exchange. The
Commission also believes it is
reasonable for the Exchange to charge
non-U.S. companies the same initial
listing fees as domestic companies
since, according to the Exchange, they
receive the same level of service from
the Exchange. For these reasons, the
Commission believes the proposed fee
changes meet the statutory standard of
an equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among
issuers.
For the foregoing reasons, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act.11
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,12 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSEALTR–
2009–02) be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–5718 Filed 3–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–59561; File No. SR–
NYSEALTR–2009–25]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE
Alternext US LLC Eliminating the
Ability To Enter Orders on the
Exchange With the Settlement
Instructions of ‘‘Cash’’, ‘‘Next Day’’
and ‘‘Seller’s Option’’ To Conform to
Amendments Filed by the New York
Stock Exchange
March 11, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on March 5,
2009, NYSE Alternext US LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Alternext’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). In approving the proposed
rule change, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact in efficiency, competition
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11393
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to eliminate
the ability to enter orders on the
Exchange with the settlement
instructions of ‘‘cash’’, ‘‘next day’’ and
‘‘seller’s option’’ to conform to
amendments filed by the New York
Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’).
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Through this filing the Exchange
seeks to amend several NYSE Alternext
Equities rules to conform these rules
with amendments filed by the New York
Stock Exchange 4 to remove references
to certain settlement instructions that
are no longer compatible with the
Exchange’s more electronic market.
These include instructions to settle on
‘‘cash’’, ‘‘next day’’ or ‘‘seller’s option’’
basis.
I. Background
As described more fully in a related
rule filing,5 NYSE Euronext acquired
The Amex Membership Corporation
(‘‘AMC’’) pursuant to an Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated January 17, 2008
(the ‘‘Merger’’). In connection with the
Merger, the Exchange’s predecessor, the
American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’), a subsidiary of AMC, became
a subsidiary of NYSE Euronext called
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
59446 (February 25, 2009), 74 FR 9323 (March 3,
2009) (SR–NYSE–2009–17).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58673
(September 29, 2008), 73 FR 57707 (October 3,
2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–60 and SR–Amex–2008–62)
(approving the Merger).
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11392-11393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5718]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-59560; File No. SR-NYSEALTR-2009-02]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Alternext US LLC.; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To Revise Listing Fees
March 11, 2009.
I. Introduction
On January 8, 2009, NYSE Alternext US LLC (``NYSE Alternext'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to revise its listing fees. The proposed rule
change was published in the Federal Register on February 4, 2009.\3\
The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59304 (January 27,
2009), 74 FR 6077 (February 4, 2009) (hereinafter referred to as
``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes amending its initial listing fees for common
stock or common stock equivalents. The initial listing fees set forth
in Section 140 of the Exchange's Company Guide for issuances of (i)
less than five million shares would be increased from $40,000 to
$50,000, (ii) five million to 10 million shares would be increased from
$50,000 to $55,000, (iii) 10,000,001 shares to 15 million shares would
be increased from $55,000 to $60,000 and (iv) in excess of 15 million
shares would be increased from $65,000 to $70,000. The Exchange further
proposes eliminating its $5,000 application fee in connection with a
company's initial listing on the Exchange.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange proposes to make conforming changes to Section
144 of the Company Guide to eliminate references to the application
processing fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes eliminating the $5,000 application
processing fee in Section 140, payable in connection with the initial
listing of a class of bonds of an issuer that does not have another
class of securities listed on the Exchange. Additionally, Section 140
currently provides that, in the case of non-U.S. issuers listed on
foreign stock exchanges, the fee, including the one-time, non-
refundable application-processing fee of $5,000, is $40,000. The
Exchange proposes to conform the initial listing fees charged to non-
U.S. companies to those charged to domestic companies.
Effective January 1, 2010, the Exchange proposes to increase the
annual fee for issuers that have between 50,000,001 and 75 million
shares outstanding from $32,500 to $36,500 and for issuers with an
excess of 75 million shares outstanding the annual fee would be raised
from $34,000 to $40,000.\5\ Moreover, as of the date of approval of
this rule filing, issuers would be required to pay a supplemental
annual fee equal to the difference between the amount they would pay in
2009 based on the current annual fee rates and the amount they would be
required to pay if the 2010 annual fee rates were in place on January
1, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Exchange proposes to retain the minimum annual fee of
$27,500 for issuers with 50 million shares or less outstanding.
Therefore, issuers with 50 million shares or less outstanding will
not be subject to any annual fee increase for 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further proposes eliminating Section 146 in its
entirety and the provisions in Sections 140 and 142(g) that grants the
Board of Directors of the Exchange the discretion to defer, waive or
rebate all or any part of the initial listing fee payable in connection
with any listing of securities or additional shares. The Exchange also
proposes amending Section 142 of the Company Guide by (i) increasing
from $60,000 to $65,000 the maximum fee per issuer for listing
additional shares in a calendar year and (ii) increasing from $2,000 to
$2,500 the fee charged in connection with a company changing its name
or ticker symbol.
The Exchange also proposes to adopt a fee of $7,500 for technical
original listings (``Technical Original Listings'') and reverse stock
splits. The Exchange would apply the proposed $7,500 application fee
for a Technical Original Listing if the change in the company's status
is technical in nature and the shareholders of the original company
receive or retain a share-for-share interest in the new company without
any change in their equity position or rights.\6\ The $7,500
application fee would also apply to reverse stock splits. The Technical
Original Listing fee will replace the current $5,000 fee for
``substitution listings'' set forth in Section 142(d). The Technical
Original Listing fee is intended to apply only to those events that
would have previously
[[Page 11393]]
been subject to the substitution listing fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Minor technical amendments are being made to Rule 142(e) to
reflect the fact that reincorporation will be explicitly included in
the categories of events subject to the proposed Technical Original
Listing fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange is amending the language of Section 142 to
state that the fees in the section apply to non-U.S. companies.
According to the Exchange, they have always applied the fees in Section
142 to non-U.S. companies, and therefore, this amendment clarifies the
Exchange's policy.
III. Discussion and Commission's Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.
Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\7\ which requires, among other things, that
the rules of an exchange provide for equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its members and issuers and other
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the Notice, many of the Exchange's proposed fees,
such as the initial listing fees for common stock or common stock
equivalents, the maximum fee per issuer for listing additional shares
in a calendar year, the fee charged in connection with a company
changing its name or ticker symbol, and the Technical Original Listing
fees are competitive with or substantially similar to the fees already
in place at Nasdaq.\8\ The Commission recognizes that competition for
listings is becoming increasingly vigorous, and that such competition
may help to ensure the reasonableness of fees among the markets vying
for new listings.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Notice, supra note 3.
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55202 (January 30,
2007), 72 FR 6017 (February 8, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, as described in the Notice, the Exchange represented that
it had increased services to listed companies and incurred increased
costs for services and regulatory programs, which required changes to
its listing fees.\10\ The Exchange also cited different levels of
services based on the number of outstanding shares to support the
higher fees generally paid to the Exchange by larger companies and to
provide justification for the proposed increases. Accordingly, the
Commission believes that the Exchange's proposed fee increases are
reasonable, given the current competitive landscape, the listing fees
charged by Nasdaq, the services the Exchange offers issuers that choose
to list with NYSE Alternext and the increased regulatory oversight
costs noted by the Exchange. The Commission also believes it is
reasonable for the Exchange to charge non-U.S. companies the same
initial listing fees as domestic companies since, according to the
Exchange, they receive the same level of service from the Exchange. For
these reasons, the Commission believes the proposed fee changes meet
the statutory standard of an equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among issuers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Notice, supra note 3. Additionally, some costs were
offset by the elimination of the $5,000 application fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). In approving the proposed rule change,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact in
efficiency, competition and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\12\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEALTR-2009-02) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5718 Filed 3-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P