Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 10301-10303 [E9-5037]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Notices
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–63,939 is hereby issued as
follows:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–63,939]
Hewlett Packard, Inkjet and Web
Solutions Division; Including On-Site
Leased Workers From CDI, Manpower,
Securitas Security Services USA, Volt
Cable Consultants, D/B/A Black Box
Network Services Managed Business
Solutions and 888 Consulting Group,
Inc., D/B/A TAC Worldside, Corvallis,
OR; Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26
U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on September 19, 2008,
applicable to workers of Hewlett
Packard, Inkjet and Web Solutions
Division, including on-site leased
workers from CDI, Manpower, Securitas
Security Services USA and Volt,
Corvallis, Oregon. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
October 3, 2008 (73 FR 57682). The
certification was amended on December
4, 2008 to include on-site leased
workers from Cable Consultants, d/b/a
Black Box Network Services. The notice
was published in the Federal Register
on December 15, 2008 (73 FR 76058).
At the request of petitioners, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers are engaged in the production
of inkjet supplies, particularly in jet
printer cartridge heads.
New information shows that workers
leased from Managed Business
Solutions and 888 Consulting Group,
Inc., d/b/a TAC Worldwide were
employed on-site at the Corvallis,
Oregon location of Hewlett Packard,
Inkjet and Web Solutions Division. The
Department has determined that these
workers were sufficiently under the
control of the subject firm to be
considered leased workers.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include leased workers
from Managed Business Solutions and
888 Consulting Group, Inc., d/b/a TAC
Worldwide working on-site at the Inkjet
and Web Solutions Division, Corvallis,
Oregon location of the subject firm.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 Mar 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
All workers of Hewlett Packard, Inkjet and
Web Solutions Division, including on-site
leased workers from CDI, Manpower,
Securitas Security Services USA, Volt,
Managed Business Solutions and 888
Consulting Group, Inc., d/b/a TAC
Worldwide, Corvallis, Oregon, engaged in the
production of inkjet supplies, who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after August 26, 2007,
through September 19, 2010, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of
February 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9–5041 Filed 3–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
period of February 17 through February
20, 2009.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A)—all of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10301
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B)—both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in
production by such workers’ firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of
articles like or directly competitive with
articles which are produced by such
firm or subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be
satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles is a party to a free trade
agreement with the United States;
2. The country to which the workers’
firm has shifted production of the
articles to a beneficiary country under
the Andean Trade Preference Act,
African Growth and Opportunity Act, or
the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery
Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an
increase in imports of articles that are
like or directly competitive with articles
which are or were produced by such
firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative
determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm
and a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is a supplier or downstream producer to
a firm (or subdivision) that employed a
group of workers who received a
certification of eligibility to apply for
trade adjustment assistance benefits and
such supply or production is related to
the article that was the basis for such
certification; and
(3) Either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied for
the firm (or subdivision) described in
paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20
percent of the production or sales of the
workers’ firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm (or subdivision)
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
10302
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Notices
described in paragraph (2) contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers,
the group eligibility requirements of
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–64,952; Heritage Footwear, Inc.,
Fort Payne, AL: January 14, 2008
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W–64,802; HR Solutions, LLC,
Subsidiary of Affiliated Computer
Services, Pittsburgh, PA: December
22, 2007
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act
have been met.
None
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 Mar 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–64,528; Fujifilm Manufacturing
U.S.A., Inc., Greenwood, SC:
November 24, 2007
TA–W–64,876; Bridgestone Americas
Tire Operations, LLC, Bato Division,
LaVergne, TN: January 12, 2008
TA–W–64,905; Kelsey-Hayes Company,
North American Braking and
Suspension Division, Leased
Workers from Sizemore, Warrenton,
GA: January 14, 2008
TA–W–65,147A; Bradington-Young,
LLC, Hickory Plant, On-Site Leased
Workers of Manpower, Hickory, NC:
February 5, 2008
TA–W–65,147B; Bradington-Young,
LLC, Cover Plant, Cherryville, NC:
February 5, 2008
TA–W–65,147C; Bradington-Young,
LLC, Frames Plant, Cherryville, NC:
February 5, 2008
TA–W–65,147; Bradington-Young, LLC,
Cherryville Plant, On-Site Leased
Workers of PSU Personal Services,
Woodleaf, NC: February 5, 2008
TA–W–65,175; Molded Dimensions,
Inc., Port Washington, WI: February
6, 2008
TA–W–65,101; Kelsey Hayes Company,
North American Braking and
Suspension Division, Fowlerville,
MI: September 12, 2008
TA–W–64,408; Theis Precision Steel
Corporation, A Subsidiary of
Friedrich Gustav Their
Kaltwalzwerke, Bristol, CT:
November 10, 2007
TA–W–64,737A; Stillwater Mining
Company, Stillwater Mine, Nye,
MT: December 4, 2007
TA–W–64,737B; Stillwater Mining
Company, Stillwater Metallurgical
Complex, Columbus Administration
and Warehouse, Columbus, MT:
December 4, 2007
TA–W–64,737C; Stillwater Mining
Company, East Boulder Mine,
McLeod, MT: December 4, 2007
TA–W–64,737; Stillwater Mining
Company, Corporation Office,
Billings, MT: December 4, 2007
TA–W–64,815; Pittsburgh Corning
Corporation, Subsidiary of PPG, Inc.
and Corning, Inc., Port Allegany,
PA: January 5, 2008
TA–W–64,875; Rosboro Lumber
Company, Lumber Division,
Springfield, OR: November 16, 2008
TA–W–64,983; Plum Creek Northwest
Lumber, Inc., Pablo Sawmill,
Leased Workers of LC Staffing,
Pablo, MT: January 22, 2008
TA–W–65,086; Penn Racquet Sports,
Inc., A Subsidiary of HTM USA
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Holdings, Phoenix, AZ: February 2,
2008
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and
Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act
have been met.
TA–W–64,944; Invista S.A.R.L., Leased
Worekrs of Mundy Maintenance,
Service and Operations,
Waynesboro, VA: January 20, 2008
TA–W–64,967; ARRK Product
Development Group, San Diego, CA:
January 14, 2008
TA–W–64,985; JCIM, US–LLC, Formerly
known as Plastech Engineered
Products, Wauseon, OH: January
22, 2008
TA–W–64,988; Source Northwest, Inc.,
dba Source Window Coverings,
Woodinville, WA: January 22, 2008
TA–W–65,039; Elcoteq, Inc., Richardson
Division, Richardson, TX: January
29, 2008
TA–W–65,076; Pentair Water, Water
Systems Division, A Subsidiary of
Pentair, Delavan, WI: January 15,
2008
TA–W–65,163; International Textile
Group, Burlington Worldwide,
Cordova, NC: January 6, 2009
TA–W–65,172; Summit Polymers, Inc.,
Valley Plant, Portage, MI: January
23, 2008
TA–W–64,424; Schawk, Inc., Stamford
Division Stamford, CT: November
12, 2007
TA–W–64,956; Citigroup Global
Markets, Presentation Technologies
Group New York, NY: January 20,
2008
TA–W–65,041; Alcatel-Lucent, Inc.,
Multicore Product Division, SSG
Group Plano, TX: January 26, 2008
TA–W–65,051; Tyco Electronics,
Carlisle, PA: January 29, 2008
TA–W–65,143; Goulds Pumps/ITT
Industries, Ashland, PA: January
21, 2008
TA–W–65,186; Elkay Manufacturing
Company, Elkay Distribution
Company, Bolingbrook, IL: February
6, 2008
TA–W–65,198; Touch Sensor
Technologies, LLC, Subsidiary of
Methode Electronics, Leased
Workers From Kay and Associates,
Wheaton, IL: February 6, 2008
TA–W–65,200; DimcoGray Corporation,
Molding Department Centerville,
OH: February 6, 2008
TA–W–65,220; Allied Motion Motor
Equipment, Owosso, MI: February 9,
2008
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Notices
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade
Act have been met.
TA–W–64,974; Fredon Development
Industries, LLC, Newton, NJ:
January 23, 2008
TA–W–64,421; Pacific Automotive
Components and Systems
International, ImLay City, MI:
November 12, 2007
TA–W–64,870; Molded Fiber Glass Co.,
Stevenson, WA: January 12, 2008
TA–W–64,902; Shin Etsu Handoti
America, Inc., Leased Workers of
Volt and Kelly Temporary,
Vancouver, WA: January 14, 2008
TA–W–64,960; Pax Machine Works, Inc.,
Celina, OH: January 21, 2008
TA–W–65,102; Kelsey Hayes Company,
North American Braking and
Suspension Division Fenton, MI:
February 3, 2008
TA–W–65,178; Louis Lavitt Company,
Inc., Hickory, NC: February 6, 2008
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(b) (downstream producer for a firm
whose workers are certified eligible to
apply for TAA based on increased
imports from or a shift in production to
Mexico or Canada) and Section
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have
been met.
None
Negative Determinations for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been
determined that the requirements of
246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for
the reasons specified.
The Department has determined that
criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been
met. The firm does not have a
significant number of workers 50 years
of age or older.
TA–W–64,952; Heritage Footwear, Inc.,
Fort Payne, AL
The Department has determined that
criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been
met. Workers at the firm possess skills
that are easily transferable.
TA–W–64,802; HR Solutions, LLC,
Subsidiary of Affiliated Computer
Services, Pittsburgh, PA
The Department has determined that
criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been
met. Competition conditions within the
workers’ industry are not adverse.
None
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 Mar 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
Because the workers of the firm are
not eligible to apply for TAA, the
workers cannot be certified eligible for
ATAA.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.)
(employment decline) have not been
met.
TA–W–64,420; Nordyne, Inc., On-Site
Leased Workers From Lifestyle
Staffing Poplar Bluff, MO.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline)
and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production
to a foreign country) have not been met.
The investigation revealed that
criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have
not been met.
TA–W–64,186; American Polymers, Inc.,
Oxford, MA.
TA–W–64,793; Lukas Confections, Inc.,
dba The Classic Caramel Co., York,
PA.
TA–W–64,846; Tracker Marine Group,
LLC, Bolivar, MO.
TA–W–64,875A; Rosboro Lumber
Company, Plywood Division
Springfield, OR.
TA–W–64,875B; Rosboro Lumber
Company, Glulam Beams Division
Springfield, OR.
TA–W–65,252; Hutchinson Technology,
Inc., Plymouth, MN.
TA–W–65,160; Hutchinson Technology,
Inc., Hutchinson, MN.
The workers’ firm does not produce
an article as required for certification
under Section 222 of the Trade Act of
1974.
TA–W–64,912; Road and Rail Services,
Venice, IL.
TA–W–65,013; Axcelis Technologies,
Global Customer Operations,
Portland, OR.
TA–W–65,021; EcoLab, Inc., Accounts
Receivable Division, Research and
Development Division, Eagan, MN.
The investigation revealed that
criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been
met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision)
is not a supplier to or a downstream
producer for a firm whose workers were
certified eligible to apply for TAA.
TA–W–64,570; ZF Lemforder, LLC,
Chicago, IL.
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of February 17
through February 20, 2009. Copies of
these determinations are available for
inspection in Room N–5428, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10303
mailed to persons who write to the
above address.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
Dated: March 3, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9–5037 Filed 3–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–64,190]
Hafner USA, Inc., New York, NY; Notice
of Negative Determination on
Reconsideration
On January 13, 2009, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA)
applicable to workers and former
workers of Hafner USA, Inc., New York,
New York (subject firm). The
Department’s Notice was published in
the Federal Register on January 26,
2009 (74 FR 4460).
The initial determination was based
on the Department’s findings that the
subject worker group does not support
a firm or appropriate subdivision that
produces an article domestically.
In order to apply for TAA based on
increased imports, the subject worker
group must meet the group eligibility
requirements under Section 222(a) of
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following criteria must be met:
A. A significant number or proportion of
the workers in such workers’ firm, or an
appropriate subdivision of the firm, have
become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially
separated; and
B. The sales or production, or both, of such
firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles produced
by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation or
threat of separation and to the decline in
sales or production of such firm or
subdivision.
29 CFR 90.2 states that a group means
‘‘three or more workers in a firm or an
appropriate subdivision thereof’’ and
that a significant number or proportion
of the workers means ‘‘at least three
workers in a firm (or appropriate
subdivision thereof) with a work force
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10301-10303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5037]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers (TA-W) number and alternative trade adjustment
assistance (ATAA) by (TA-W) number issued during the period of February
17 through February 20, 2009.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A)--all of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision
have decreased absolutely; and
C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with
articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed
importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to
the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or
II. Section (a)(2)(B)--both of the following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become
totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
B. There has been a shift in production by such workers' firm or
subdivision to a foreign country of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or
subdivision; and
C. One of the following must be satisfied:
1. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United
States;
2. The country to which the workers' firm has shifted production of
the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference
Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin
Economic Recovery Act; or
3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of
articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are
or were produced by such firm or subdivision.
Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made for
secondarily affected workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers'
firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or
partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially
separated;
(2) The workers' firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream
producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers
who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade
adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related
to the article that was the basis for such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the
workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm (or
subdivision)
[[Page 10302]]
described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance to issue a
certification of eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, the group eligibility requirements
of Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act must be met.
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-64,952; Heritage Footwear, Inc., Fort Payne, AL: January 14, 2008
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA-W-64,802; HR Solutions, LLC, Subsidiary of Affiliated Computer
Services, Pittsburgh, PA: December 22, 2007
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
None
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act have been
met.
None
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-64,528; Fujifilm Manufacturing U.S.A., Inc., Greenwood, SC:
November 24, 2007
TA-W-64,876; Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Bato Division,
LaVergne, TN: January 12, 2008
TA-W-64,905; Kelsey-Hayes Company, North American Braking and
Suspension Division, Leased Workers from Sizemore, Warrenton, GA:
January 14, 2008
TA-W-65,147A; Bradington-Young, LLC, Hickory Plant, On-Site Leased
Workers of Manpower, Hickory, NC: February 5, 2008
TA-W-65,147B; Bradington-Young, LLC, Cover Plant, Cherryville, NC:
February 5, 2008
TA-W-65,147C; Bradington-Young, LLC, Frames Plant, Cherryville, NC:
February 5, 2008
TA-W-65,147; Bradington-Young, LLC, Cherryville Plant, On-Site Leased
Workers of PSU Personal Services, Woodleaf, NC: February 5, 2008
TA-W-65,175; Molded Dimensions, Inc., Port Washington, WI: February 6,
2008
TA-W-65,101; Kelsey Hayes Company, North American Braking and
Suspension Division, Fowlerville, MI: September 12, 2008
TA-W-64,408; Theis Precision Steel Corporation, A Subsidiary of
Friedrich Gustav Their Kaltwalzwerke, Bristol, CT: November 10, 2007
TA-W-64,737A; Stillwater Mining Company, Stillwater Mine, Nye, MT:
December 4, 2007
TA-W-64,737B; Stillwater Mining Company, Stillwater Metallurgical
Complex, Columbus Administration and Warehouse, Columbus, MT: December
4, 2007
TA-W-64,737C; Stillwater Mining Company, East Boulder Mine, McLeod, MT:
December 4, 2007
TA-W-64,737; Stillwater Mining Company, Corporation Office, Billings,
MT: December 4, 2007
TA-W-64,815; Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Subsidiary of PPG, Inc.
and Corning, Inc., Port Allegany, PA: January 5, 2008
TA-W-64,875; Rosboro Lumber Company, Lumber Division, Springfield, OR:
November 16, 2008
TA-W-64,983; Plum Creek Northwest Lumber, Inc., Pablo Sawmill, Leased
Workers of LC Staffing, Pablo, MT: January 22, 2008
TA-W-65,086; Penn Racquet Sports, Inc., A Subsidiary of HTM USA
Holdings, Phoenix, AZ: February 2, 2008
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-64,944; Invista S.A.R.L., Leased Worekrs of Mundy Maintenance,
Service and Operations, Waynesboro, VA: January 20, 2008
TA-W-64,967; ARRK Product Development Group, San Diego, CA: January 14,
2008
TA-W-64,985; JCIM, US-LLC, Formerly known as Plastech Engineered
Products, Wauseon, OH: January 22, 2008
TA-W-64,988; Source Northwest, Inc., dba Source Window Coverings,
Woodinville, WA: January 22, 2008
TA-W-65,039; Elcoteq, Inc., Richardson Division, Richardson, TX:
January 29, 2008
TA-W-65,076; Pentair Water, Water Systems Division, A Subsidiary of
Pentair, Delavan, WI: January 15, 2008
TA-W-65,163; International Textile Group, Burlington Worldwide,
Cordova, NC: January 6, 2009
TA-W-65,172; Summit Polymers, Inc., Valley Plant, Portage, MI: January
23, 2008
TA-W-64,424; Schawk, Inc., Stamford Division Stamford, CT: November 12,
2007
TA-W-64,956; Citigroup Global Markets, Presentation Technologies Group
New York, NY: January 20, 2008
TA-W-65,041; Alcatel-Lucent, Inc., Multicore Product Division, SSG
Group Plano, TX: January 26, 2008
TA-W-65,051; Tyco Electronics, Carlisle, PA: January 29, 2008
TA-W-65,143; Goulds Pumps/ITT Industries, Ashland, PA: January 21, 2008
TA-W-65,186; Elkay Manufacturing Company, Elkay Distribution Company,
Bolingbrook, IL: February 6, 2008
TA-W-65,198; Touch Sensor Technologies, LLC, Subsidiary of Methode
Electronics, Leased Workers From Kay and Associates, Wheaton, IL:
February 6, 2008
TA-W-65,200; DimcoGray Corporation, Molding Department Centerville, OH:
February 6, 2008
TA-W-65,220; Allied Motion Motor Equipment, Owosso, MI: February 9,
2008
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA)
[[Page 10303]]
and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have been met.
TA-W-64,974; Fredon Development Industries, LLC, Newton, NJ: January
23, 2008
TA-W-64,421; Pacific Automotive Components and Systems International,
ImLay City, MI: November 12, 2007
TA-W-64,870; Molded Fiber Glass Co., Stevenson, WA: January 12, 2008
TA-W-64,902; Shin Etsu Handoti America, Inc., Leased Workers of Volt
and Kelly Temporary, Vancouver, WA: January 14, 2008
TA-W-64,960; Pax Machine Works, Inc., Celina, OH: January 21, 2008
TA-W-65,102; Kelsey Hayes Company, North American Braking and
Suspension Division Fenton, MI: February 3, 2008
TA-W-65,178; Louis Lavitt Company, Inc., Hickory, NC: February 6, 2008
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(b) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA based on increased imports from or
a shift in production to Mexico or Canada) and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Trade Act have been met.
None
Negative Determinations for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, it has been determined that the
requirements of 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The Department has determined that criterion (1) of Section 246 has
not been met. The firm does not have a significant number of workers 50
years of age or older.
TA-W-64,952; Heritage Footwear, Inc., Fort Payne, AL
The Department has determined that criterion (2) of Section 246 has
not been met. Workers at the firm possess skills that are easily
transferable.
TA-W-64,802; HR Solutions, LLC, Subsidiary of Affiliated Computer
Services, Pittsburgh, PA
The Department has determined that criterion (3) of Section 246 has
not been met. Competition conditions within the workers' industry are
not adverse.
None
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
Because the workers of the firm are not eligible to apply for TAA,
the workers cannot be certified eligible for ATAA.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and
(a)(2)(B)(II.A.) (employment decline) have not been met.
TA-W-64,420; Nordyne, Inc., On-Site Leased Workers From Lifestyle
Staffing Poplar Bluff, MO.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or
production, or both, did not decline) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in
production to a foreign country) have not been met.
The investigation revealed that criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased
imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production to a foreign
country) have not been met.
TA-W-64,186; American Polymers, Inc., Oxford, MA.
TA-W-64,793; Lukas Confections, Inc., dba The Classic Caramel Co.,
York, PA.
TA-W-64,846; Tracker Marine Group, LLC, Bolivar, MO.
TA-W-64,875A; Rosboro Lumber Company, Plywood Division Springfield, OR.
TA-W-64,875B; Rosboro Lumber Company, Glulam Beams Division
Springfield, OR.
TA-W-65,252; Hutchinson Technology, Inc., Plymouth, MN.
TA-W-65,160; Hutchinson Technology, Inc., Hutchinson, MN.
The workers' firm does not produce an article as required for
certification under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.
TA-W-64,912; Road and Rail Services, Venice, IL.
TA-W-65,013; Axcelis Technologies, Global Customer Operations,
Portland, OR.
TA-W-65,021; EcoLab, Inc., Accounts Receivable Division, Research and
Development Division, Eagan, MN.
The investigation revealed that criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has
not been met. The workers' firm (or subdivision) is not a supplier to
or a downstream producer for a firm whose workers were certified
eligible to apply for TAA.
TA-W-64,570; ZF Lemforder, LLC, Chicago, IL.
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of February 17 through February 20, 2009. Copies of
these determinations are available for inspection in Room N-5428, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210
during normal business hours or will be mailed to persons who write to
the above address.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
Dated: March 3, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9-5037 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P