Barium Carbonate From China, 10278 [E9-5017]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
10278
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1020 (Review)]
Barium Carbonate From China
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on barium carbonate from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on September 2, 2008 (73 FR
51315) and determined on December 8,
2008 that it would conduct an expedited
review (73 FR 77058, December 18,
2008).
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on January 30,
2009. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4060
(January 2009), entitled Barium
Carbonate from China: Investigation No.
731–TA–1020 (Review).
Issued: March 4, 2009.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–5017 Filed 3–9–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–669]
In the Matter of Certain Optoelectronic
Devices, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing the Same; Notice
of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
February 3, 2009, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Avago
Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte.
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 Mar 09, 2009
Jkt 217001
Ltd. of Singapore; Avago Technologies
General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of
Singapore; and Avago Technologies Ltd.
of San Jose, California. Letters
supplementing the Complaint were filed
on February 12, 18, and 25, 2009. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain
optoelectronic devices, components
thereof, and products containing the
same that infringe certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 5,359,447 and 5,761,229.
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue an
exclusion order and a cease and desist
order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
202–205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2580.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2008).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
March 3, 2009, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain optoelectronic
devices, components thereof, or
products containing the same that
infringe one or more of claims 1–6 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,359,447 and claim 8
of U.S. Patent No. 5,761,229, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are—
Avago Technologies Fiber IP,
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 1 Yishun
Avenue 7, Singapore 768923.
Avago Technologies General IP,
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 1 Yishun
Avenue 7, Singapore 768923.
Avago Technologies Ltd., 350 West
Trimble Road, Building 90, San Jose,
California 95131.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Emcore Corporation, 10420 Research
Road SE., Albuquerque, New Mexico
87123.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief
Administrative Law Judge, U.S.
International Trade Commission, shall
designate the presiding Administrative
Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5017]
[[Page 10278]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-1020 (Review)]
Barium Carbonate From China
Determination
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission)
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on
barium carbonate from China would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission instituted this review on September 2, 2008 (73 FR
51315) and determined on December 8, 2008 that it would conduct an
expedited review (73 FR 77058, December 18, 2008).
The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on January 30, 2009. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication 4060 (January 2009), entitled Barium
Carbonate from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1020 (Review).
Issued: March 4, 2009.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-5017 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
