Barium Carbonate From China, 10278 [E9-5017]

Download as PDF 10278 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 10, 2009 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1020 (Review)] Barium Carbonate From China Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on barium carbonate from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted this review on September 2, 2008 (73 FR 51315) and determined on December 8, 2008 that it would conduct an expedited review (73 FR 77058, December 18, 2008). The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on January 30, 2009. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4060 (January 2009), entitled Barium Carbonate from China: Investigation No. 731–TA–1020 (Review). Issued: March 4, 2009. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–5017 Filed 3–9–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–669] In the Matter of Certain Optoelectronic Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of Investigation AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on February 3, 2009, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Avago Technologies Fiber IP (Singapore) Pte. 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:20 Mar 09, 2009 Jkt 217001 Ltd. of Singapore; Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; and Avago Technologies Ltd. of San Jose, California. Letters supplementing the Complaint were filed on February 12, 18, and 25, 2009. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain optoelectronic devices, components thereof, and products containing the same that infringe certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,359,447 and 5,761,229. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and a cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2580. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2008). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on March 3, 2009, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain optoelectronic devices, components thereof, or products containing the same that infringe one or more of claims 1–6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,359,447 and claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 5,761,229, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are— Avago Technologies Fiber IP, (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 1 Yishun Avenue 7, Singapore 768923. Avago Technologies General IP, (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., 1 Yishun Avenue 7, Singapore 768923. Avago Technologies Ltd., 350 West Trimble Road, Building 90, San Jose, California 95131. (b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: Emcore Corporation, 10420 Research Road SE., Albuquerque, New Mexico 87123. (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Kecia J. Reynolds, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 10, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 10278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5017]



[[Page 10278]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1020 (Review)]


Barium Carbonate From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on 
barium carbonate from China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on September 2, 2008 (73 FR 
51315) and determined on December 8, 2008 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (73 FR 77058, December 18, 2008).
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the 
Secretary of Commerce on January 30, 2009. The views of the Commission 
are contained in USITC Publication 4060 (January 2009), entitled Barium 
Carbonate from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1020 (Review).

    Issued: March 4, 2009.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E9-5017 Filed 3-9-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P