Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 8907-8911 [E9-4248]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices
Dated: February 20, 2009.
John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–4244 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–932)
Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 27, 2009.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) has determined that
certain steel threaded rod (‘‘STR’’) from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
is being, or is likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(‘‘LTFV’’) as provided in section 735 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(‘‘Act’’). The final dumping margins for
this investigation are listed in the ‘‘Final
Determination Margins’’ section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bobby Wong or Toni Dach, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–0409 or (202) 482–
1655, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Case History
On October 8, 2008, the Department
published in the Federal Register its
preliminary determination. See Certain
Steel Threaded Rod from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value, 73 FR 58931 (October 8,
2008) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’).
On October 27, 2008, the Department
published in the Federal Register its
amended preliminary determination
that STR from the PRC are being, or are
likely to be, sold in the United States at
LTFV. See Certain Steel Threaded Rod
from the People’s Republic of China:
Amended Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination,
73 FR 63693 (October 27, 2008)
(‘‘Amended Preliminary
Determination’’).1 As provided in
1 In the Amended Preliminary Determination, the
Department amended the Preliminary
Determination to correct certain ministerial errors
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
section 782(i) of the Act, we verified the
information submitted by: 1) RMB
Fasteners Ltd. and IFI & Morgan Ltd.2
(the ‘‘RMB/IFI Group’’) from November
3–4, 2008, and Jiaxing Brother Standard
Part Co.3 (‘‘Jiaxing Brother’’), its
affiliated producer from November 6–7,
2008; 2) Ningbo Yinzhou Foreign Trade
Co., Ltd.4 (‘‘Ningbo Yinzhou’’) from
November 13–14, 2008, and Haiyan
Zhonghuan Fastener Factory
(‘‘Zhonghuan’’), one of Ningbo
Yingzhou’s manufacturers, and Zhejiang
Guorui Industry Co., Ltd.5 (‘‘Guorui’’),
one of Ningbo Yinzhou’s suppliers from
November 10–12, 2008; and 3) Shanghai
Prime Machinery Co., Ltd.6 (‘‘Shanghai
Prime’’), a separate rate respondent, on
November 17, 2008. On December 12,
2008, Vulcan Threaded Products
(‘‘Petitioner’’) and the RMB/IFI Group
placed new factual information on the
record regarding surrogate valuation,
and submitted rebuttal comments on
December 22, 2008. In accordance with
19 CFR 351.309(c)(i), we invited parties
to comment on our Preliminary
Determination. On January 16, 2009, the
Department received case briefs from
with respect to the antidumping duty margin
calculation for RMB Fasteners Ltd. and IFI and
Morgan Ltd.
2 See Memorandum to the File from Scot T.
Fullerton, Program Manager, and Toni Dach,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, regarding:
‘‘Verification of the Sales Response of RMB
Fasteners Ltd. and IFI & Morgan Ltd. in the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Steel
Threaded Rod from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated January 6, 2009 (‘‘RMB & IFI
Verification Report’’).
3 See Memorandum to the File from Scot T.
Fullerton, Program Manager, and Toni Dach,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, regarding:
‘‘Verification of the Factors of Production Response
of Jiaxing Brother Standard Part Co. in the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Steel
Threaded Rod from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated January 6, 2009 (‘‘Brother Fastener
Verification Report’’).
4 See Memorandum to the File from Scot T.
Fullerton, Program Manager, and Toni Dach,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, regarding:
‘‘Verification of the Sales Response of Ningbo
Yinzhou Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. in the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Steel
Threaded Rod from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated January 6, 2009 (‘‘Ningbo Yinzhou
Verification Report’’).
5 See Memorandum to the File from Scot T.
Fullerton, Program Manager, and Toni Dach,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, regarding:
‘‘Verification of the Factors of Production Response
of Haiyan Zhonguan Fastener Factory and Zhejiang
Guorui Industry Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Steel Threaded Rod from
the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated January 6,
2009 (‘‘Zhonghuan & Guorui Verification Report’’).
6 See Memorandum to the File from Scot T.
Fullerton, Program Manager, and Toni Dach,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, regarding:
‘‘Verification of the Separate Rate Response of
Shanghai Prime Machinery Co., Ltd. in the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Steel
Threaded Rod from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated January 6, 2009 (‘‘Shanghai Prime
Separate Rate Verification Report’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8907
the RMB/IFI Group, Ningbo Yinzhou,
and Petitioner. On January 23, 2009, we
received rebuttal briefs from Petitioner
and the RMB/IFI Group. On November
6 and 7, 2008, Petitioner and the RMB/
IFI Group submitted requests for a
hearing, respectively. On January 22,
2009, Petitioner and the RMB/IFI Group
withdrew their requests for a hearing.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by the parties to this
investigation are addressed in the
‘‘Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the
People’s Republic of China: Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final
Determination of Sales at Less than Fair
Value,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice, which is hereby adopted by this
notice in its entirety (‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum’’). A list of the
issues which parties raised and to
which we respond in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached to
this notice as an Appendix. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file in the Central
Records Unit in the main Commerce
building, Room 1117, and is accessible
on the Web at https://www.trade.gov/ia.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) is
July 1, 2007, through December 31,
2007.
Scope of Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is steel threaded rod. Steel
threaded rod is certain threaded rod,
bar, or studs, of carbon quality steel,
having a solid, circular cross section, of
any diameter, in any straight length, that
have been forged, turned, cold drawn,
cold rolled, machine straightened, or
otherwise cold finished, and into which
threaded grooves have been applied. In
addition, the steel threaded rod, bar, or
studs subject to this investigation are
non headed and threaded along greater
than 25 percent of their total length. A
variety of finishes or coatings, such as
plain oil finish as a temporary rust
protectant, zinc coating (i.e., galvanized,
whether by electroplating or hot–
dipping), paint, and other similar
finishes and coatings, may be applied to
the merchandise.
Included in the scope of this
investigation are steel threaded rod, bar,
or studs, in which: (1) iron
predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; (2) the
carbon content is 2 percent or less, by
weight; and (3) none of the elements
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
8908
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices
listed below exceeds the quantity, by
weight, respectively indicated:
• 1.80 percent of manganese, or
• 1.50 percent of silicon, or
• 1.00 percent of copper, or
• 0.50 percent of aluminum, or
• 1.25 percent of chromium, or
• 0.30 percent of cobalt, or
• 0.40 percent of lead, or
• 1.25 percent of nickel, or
• 0.30 percent of tungsten, or
• 0.012 percent of boron, or
• 0.10 percent of molybdenum, or
• 0.10 percent of niobium, or
• 0.41 percent of titanium, or
• 0.15 percent of vanadium, or
• 0.15 percent of zirconium.
Steel threaded rod is currently
classifiable under subheading
7318.15.5050 and 7318.15.5090 of the
HTSUS. Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise is
dispositive.
Excluded from the scope of the
investigation are: (a) threaded rod, bar,
or studs which are threaded only on one
or both ends and the threading covers
25 percent or less of the total length;
and (b) threaded rod, bar, or studs made
to American Society for Testing and
Materials (‘‘ASTM’’) A193 Grade B7,
ASTM A193 Grade B7M, ASTM A193
Grade B16, or ASTM A320 Grade L7.
Scope–HTSUS Modification
On September 22, 2008, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) informed
the Department that on July 1, 2008, it
amended the United States Harmonized
Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTSUS’’) category
7318.15.5060, and replaced the category
with two new HTSUS categories:
7318.15.5050 and 7318.15.5090.
Therefore, the Department has modified
the scope to reflect the new HTSUS
categories.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our findings at verification,
and additional information placed on
the record of this investigation, we have
made changes since the Amended
Preliminary Determination. As
discussed further below, we have
applied total adverse facts available
(‘‘AFA’’) to Ningbo Yinzhou for
purposes of this final determination. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 5.
Based on our analysis of information
on the record of this investigation, and
comments received from the interested
parties, we have made changes to the
margin calculations for the RMB/IFI
Group. We have revalued certain
surrogate values used in the Amended
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
Preliminary Determination. The values
that were modified for this final
determination are those for surrogate
financial ratios, packing strips, buckles,
and coal. For further details see I&D
Memo at Comment 6, and Memorandum
to the File from Bobby Wong, through
Scot T. Fullerton, Program Manager,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, and
James C. Doyle, Director, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9; Certain Steel
Threaded Rod from the People’s
Republic of China: Surrogate Values for
the Final Determination, dated February
20, 2009 (‘‘Final Surrogate Value
Memo’’).
In addition, we have made certain
company–specific changes since the
Amended Preliminary Determination.
Specifically, we have incorporated,
where applicable, post–preliminary
clarifications based on a post–
preliminary supplemental questionnaire
and verification for the RMB/IFI Group.
For further details on these company–
specific changes, see Memorandum to
the File, through Scot T. Fullerton,
Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, from Bobby Wong, Senior
International Trade Analyst, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, regarding
‘‘Program Analysis for the Final
Determination of Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Steel Threaded
Rod from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ dated February 20, 2009 (‘‘The
RMB/IFI Group Analysis
Memorandum’’).
Adverse Facts Available
Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides
that the Department shall apply ‘‘facts
otherwise available’’ if, inter alia, an
interested party or any other person (A)
withholds information that has been
requested, (B) fails to provide
information within the deadlines
established, or in the form or manner
requested by the Department, subject to
subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782
of the Act, (C) significantly impedes a
proceeding, or (D) provides information
that cannot be verified as provided by
section 782(i) of the Act. Section 776(b)
of the Act provides further that the
Department may use an adverse
inference when a party has failed to
cooperate by not acting to the best of its
ability to comply with a request for
information.
Pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), and (D) of the Act, we are applying
facts otherwise available to Ningbo
Yinzhou because it withheld certain
information that had been requested by
the Department which significantly
impeded the Department’s investigation.
Ningbo Yinzhou failed to provide
information regarding certain factors of
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
production (‘‘FOP’’) in the form and
manner requested by the Department.
Ningbo Yinzhou withheld certain
information that was specifically
requested by the Department and
significantly impeded the proceeding by
not providing accurate or complete
responses to the Department’s questions
regarding certain FOPs and the sales
reconciliation. See Verification of the
Sales Response of Ningbo Yinzhou
Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. in the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the
People’s Republic of China, dated
January 6, 2009 at 2, 6–8, and 10–11;
and Ningbo Yinzhou’s response to the
Department’s First Supplemental
Sections C and D Questionnaire, dated
September 8, 2008, at 19. Additionally,
information discovered at verification
directly contradicted information
contained in Ningbo Yinzhou’s
questionnaire responses.7 Significant
delays were experienced by the
Department in completing verification
procedures, which prevented the
completion of some verification
procedures. Due to the insufficiency of
the respondent’s record keeping,
numerous verification procedures could
not be completed. For these reasons, the
Department was unable to verify certain
statements in Ningbo Yinzhou’s
questionnaire responses for which the
Department sought verification. See
Ningbo Yinzhou Verification Report and
Zhonghuan/Guorui Verification Report.
Furthermore, based on the record
evidence and pursuant to section 776(b)
of the Act, the Department has
determined that Ningbo Yinzhou did
not cooperate to the best of its ability to
comply with the Department’s requests
for information. In particular, the
Department gave specific instructions in
our questionnaires and the verification
outline as to the purpose of and
directions for submission and
7 For example, the Department specifically asked
Ningbo Yinzhou in its August 21, 2008,
supplemental questionnaire whether any FOPs
other than those reported were consumed by
Zhonghuan in production of the subject
merchandise. Ningbo Yinzhou reported in its
September 8, 2008, response that all factors
consumed by Zhonghuan in the production of the
subject merchandise were reported. We discovered
at verification that this statement was not correct,
and unreported factors were consumed in the
production of the subject merchandise.
Additionally, Ningbo Yinzhou provided a sales
reconciliation to the Department on August 8, 2008,
that they claimed reconciled its U.S. sales database
to its financial statements. At verification, we
discovered that the sales reconciliation did not tie
the U.S. sales database to Ningbo Yinzhou’s
financial statements. For additional information
and examples of situations where verification
findings contradicted Ningbo Yinzhou’s
questionnaire responses, see Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 5.
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices
verification of the reconciliation of
Ningbo Yinzhou’s U.S. sales database to
Ningbo Yinzhou’s accounting records,
and proper reporting of all FOPs for all
models. Despite these extensive
instructions, provided numerous times
over the course of the investigation,
Ningbo Yinzhou failed to provide the
Department with adequate information
and supporting documentation to fully
verify its responses to the Department’s
questionnaires. In addition, despite
multiple opportunities presented by the
Department, Ningbo Yinzhou failed to
report certain FOPs and failed to report
FOPs for each model in the U.S. sales
database. For a detailed description of
each of the deficiencies, see Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 5.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Surrogate Country
In the Preliminary Determination and
unchanged in the Amended Preliminary
Determination, we stated that we had
selected India as the appropriate
surrogate country to use in this
investigation for the following reasons:
(1) it is a significant producer of
comparable merchandise; (2) it is at a
level of economic development
comparable to that of the PRC; and (3)
we have reliable data from India that we
can use to value FOPs. See Preliminary
Determination. We received no
comments on our surrogate country
selection. Accordingly, for the final
determination, we made no changes to
our finding with respect to the selection
of India as a surrogate country.
Separate Rates
In proceedings involving non–market
economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the
Department begins with a rebuttable
presumption that all companies within
the country are subject to government
control and, thus, should be assigned a
single antidumping duty deposit rate. It
is the Department’s policy to assign all
exporters of merchandise subject to an
investigation in an NME country this
single rate unless an exporter can
demonstrate that it is sufficiently
independent so as to be entitled to a
separate rate. See Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sparklers
from the People’s Republic of China, 56
FR 20588, 20589 (May 6, 1991), as
amplified by Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from the
People’s Republic of China, 59 FR at
22585, 22587 (May 2, 1994), and 19 CFR
351.107(d).
In the Preliminary Determination and
unchanged in the Amended Preliminary
Determination, we found that Shanghai
Recky, Suntec Industries, Hangzhou
Grand, Shanghai Prime, Jianxing
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
Xinyue, CPII, Jiashan Zhongsheng,
Haiyan Dayu, and New Oriental
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘Separate Rate
Companies’’), and Ningbo Yinzhou, a
mandatory respondent, have provided
company–specific information to
demonstrate that they operate
independently of de jure and de facto
government control, and therefore
satisfy the standards for the assignment
of a separate rate.
No party has commented on the
eligibility of these companies for
separate rate status. For the final
determination, we continue to find that
the evidence placed on the record of
this investigation by these companies
demonstrates both a de jure and de facto
absence of government control with
respect to their exports of the
merchandise under investigation. Thus,
we continue to find that they are eligible
for separate rate status. Normally, the
separate rate is determined based on the
estimated weighted–average dumping
margins established for exporters and
producers individually investigated,
excluding de minimis margins or
margins based entirely on AFA. See
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
In the Preliminary Determination and
unchanged in the Amended Preliminary
Determination, the Department stated
that it could not deny the RMB/IFI
Group separate rate status because the
Department did not ask specifically for
information relating to the RMB/IFI
Group’s separate rate eligibility.
However, subsequent to the Preliminary
Determination, on October 22, 2008, in
response to the Department’s inquiry,
the RMB/IFI Group reported that it is a
wholly foreign–owned company, and at
verification the Department found no
discrepancies in the RMB/IFI Group’s
responses to the Department’s separate
rate questions. As the RMB/IFI Group is
wholly foreign–owned, a separate rate
analysis is not necessary to determine
whether it is independent from
government control. See Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Creatine Monohydrate From
the People’s Republic of China, 64 FR
71104, 71105 (December 20, 1999) (the
respondent was wholly foreign–owned,
and thus, qualified for a separate rate).
Consequently, for the final
determination we find that the evidence
placed on the record of this
investigation by the RMB/IFI Group
demonstrates that it is eligible for a
separate rate.
In the Preliminary Determination and
unchanged in the Amended Preliminary
Determination, the Department assigned
to nine exporter/producer combinations
that qualified for a separate rate a
weighted–average margin based on the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8909
experience of the mandatory
respondents, excluding any de minimis
or zero rates or rates based on total AFA.
See Preliminary Determination. For the
final determination, because the
Department based the rate for Ningbo
Yinzhou on total AFA, the Department
has applied the RMB/IFI Group’s
calculated rate for purposes of
establishing a separate rate. See section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. Therefore, the
Department will assign the RMB/IFI
Group’s calculated rate as the separate
rate for the nine exporter/producer
combinations. This rate is corroborated,
to the extent practicable, for the reasons
stated below. See ‘‘Corroboration’’
section below.
The PRC–Wide Rate
In the Preliminary Determination and
unchanged in the Amended Preliminary
Determination, the Department found
that certain companies did not respond
to our requests for information. See
Preliminary Determination, 73 FR at
58936. In the Preliminary Determination
we treated these PRC producers/
exporters as part of the PRC–wide entity
because they did not demonstrate that
they operate free of government control
over their export activities. Because
these producers/exporters did not
provide information regarding their
export activities, the Department has
determined that application of facts
available (‘‘FA’’) is warranted. No
additional information was placed on
the record with respect to these
companies after the Preliminary
Determination. Therefore, pursuant to
section 776(a)(2)(A) of the Act, the
Department continues to find that the
use of FA is appropriate to determine
the PRC–wide rate.
Section 776(b) of the Act provides
that, in selecting from among the facts
otherwise available, the Department
may employ an adverse inference if an
interested party fails to cooperate by not
acting to the best of its ability to comply
with requests for information. See
Notice of Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Cold–
Rolled Flat–Rolled Carbon–Quality Steel
Products From the Russian Federation,
65 FR 5510, 5518 (February 4, 2000).
See also Statement of Administrative
Action accompanying the URAA, H.R.
Rep. No. 103–316, vol. 1, at 870 (1994)
(‘‘SAA’’). We determined that, because
the PRC–wide entity did not respond to
our request for information, it has failed
to cooperate to the best of its ability.
Therefore, the Department finds that, in
selecting from among the facts
otherwise available, an adverse
inference is appropriate for the PRC–
wide entity.
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
8910
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices
Because we begin with the
presumption that all companies within
an NME country are subject to
government control and because only
the companies listed under the ‘‘Final
Determination Margins’’ section below
have overcome that presumption, we are
applying a single antidumping rate (i.e.,
the PRC–wide entity rate) to all other
exporters of subject merchandise from
the PRC. Such companies did not
demonstrate entitlement to a separate
rate. See, e.g., Synthetic Indigo From the
People’s Republic of China; Notice of
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value, 65 FR 25706 (May 3,
2000). The PRC–wide entity rate applies
to all entries of subject merchandise
except for entries from the respondents
which are listed in the ‘‘Final
Determination Margins’’ section below.
In the Preliminary Determination and
unchanged in the Amended Preliminary
Determination, we assigned to the PRC–
wide entity the highest rate calculated
from the petition, 206.00 percent. See
Preliminary Determination, 73 FR at
58936. We received no comments on
this rate. Therefore, for the final
determination, we have continued to
assign to the PRC–wide entity the rate
of 206.00 percent.
Corroboration
Section 776(c) of the Act provides
that, when the Department relies on
secondary information in using the facts
otherwise available, it must, to the
extent practicable, corroborate that
information from independent sources
that are reasonably at its disposal. We
have interpreted ‘‘corroborate’’ to mean
that we will, to the extent practicable,
examine the reliability and relevance of
the information submitted. See Tapered
Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof,
Finished and Unfinished, From Japan,
and Tapered Roller Bearings, Four
Inches or Less in Outside Diameter, and
Components Thereof, From Japan;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Reviews and
Partial Termination of Administrative
Reviews, 61 FR 57391, 57392 (November
6, 1996), unchanged in Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Certain Cold–Rolled Flat–
Rolled Carbon–Quality Steel Products
From Brazil, 65 FR 5554, 5568 (February
4, 2000); see, e.g., Tapered Roller
Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished
and Unfinished, From Japan, and
Tapered Roller Bearings, Four Inches or
Less in Outside Diameter, and
Components Thereof, From Japan; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and
Termination in Part, 62 FR 11825
(March 13, 1997).
To corroborate the AFA margin we
have selected, we compared that margin
to the margins calculated for the RMB/
IFI Group. We found that the margin of
206.00 percent has probative value
because it is in the range of margins
calculated for the RMB/IFI Group. See
October 1, 2008, Memorandum to the
File, From Bobby Wong, Through Scot
T. Fullerton, regarding: Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Certain Steel
Threaded Rod from the People’s
Republic of China: RMB/IFI Program
Analysis for the Preliminary
Determination, at 1. Accordingly, we
find that the rate of 206.00 percent is
corroborated within the meaning of
section 776(c) of the Act.
Combination Rates
In the Preliminary Determination, the
Department stated that it would
calculate combination rates for the
respondents that are eligible for a
separate rate in this investigation. See
Preliminary Determination, 73 FR at
58931. This change in practice is
described in Policy Bulletin 05.1,
available at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/. Policy
Bulletin 05.1, states:
{w}hile continuing the practice of
assigning separate rates only to
exporters, all separate rates that the
Department will now assign in its
NME investigations will be specific
to those producers that supplied the
exporter during the period of
investigation. Note, however, that
one rate is calculated for the
exporter and all of the producers
which supplied subject
merchandise to it during the period
of investigation. This practice
applies both to mandatory
respondents receiving an
individually calculated separate
rate as well as the pool of non–
investigated firms receiving the
weighted–average of the
individually calculated rates. This
practice is referred to as the
application of ‘‘combination rates’’
because such rates apply to specific
combinations of exporters and one
or more producers. The cash–
deposit rate assigned to an exporter
will apply only to merchandise
both exported by the firm in
question and produced by a firm
that supplied the exporter during
the period of investigation.
See Policy Bulletin 05.1, ‘‘Separate
Rates Practice and Application of
Combination Rates in Antidumping
Investigations Involving Non–Market
Economy Countries.’’
Final Determination Margins
We determine that the following
percentage weighted–average margins
exist for the POI:
CERTAIN STEEL THREADED ROD FROM THE PRC
Exporter
Weighted–Average
Margin
Producer
RMB Fasteners Ltd., and IFI & Morgan Ltd. (‘‘RMB/IFI Group’’)
Ningbo Yinzhou Foreign Trade Co. Ltd. .....................................
Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co., Ltd. (aka Jiaxing Brother
Standard Parts Co., Ltd.)
Zhejiang Guorui Industry Co., Ltd.; or Ningbo Daxie
Chuofeng Industrial Development Co. Ltd.
Producer
Shanghai Recky International Trading Co., Ltd. .........................
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Separate Rates Entities: Exporter
Shanghai Xiangrong International Trading Co., Ltd.;
Shanghai Xianglong International Trading Co., Ltd.;
Pighu City Zhapu Screw Cap Factory; or Jiaxing Xinyue
Standard Part Co., Ltd.
Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd.; or Haiyan
County No. 1 Fasteners Factory
Zhapu Creative Standard Parts Material Co., Ltd.
Haiyan Yida Fasteners Co., Ltd.; or Jiaxing Xinyue
Standard Part Co., Ltd.
Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd.
Suntec Industries Co., Ltd. ..........................................................
Hangzhou Grand Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. ......................................
Shanghai Prime Machinery Co. Ltd. ...........................................
Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd. .......................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
55.16
206.00%
Margin
27FEN1
55.16
55.16
55.16
55.16
55.16
8911
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices
Separate Rates Entities: Exporter
Producer
Certified Products International Inc. ............................................
Jiashan Zhongsheng Metal Products Co., Ltd.; or Jiaxing
Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang New Oriental Fastener Co., Ltd.
Jiashan Zhongsheng Metal Products Co., Ltd.
Haiyan Dayu Fasteners Co., Ltd.
............................................................................................
Zhejiang New Oriental Fastener Co., Ltd. ...................................
Jiashan Zhongsheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. ...........................
Haiyan Dayu Fasteners Co., Ltd. ................................................
PRC–wide Entity ..........................................................................
Margin
55.16
55.16
55.16
55.16
206.00%
Disclosure
Notification Regarding APO
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
This notice also serves as a reminder
to the parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of return or destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
We will instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to continue
the suspension of liquidation required
by section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, of all
entries of subject merchandise from the
RMB/IFI Group, Ningbo Yinzhou, the
Separate Rate Companies, and the PRC–
wide entity entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
October 8, 2008, the date of publication
of the Preliminary Determination. CBP
shall continue to require a cash deposit
or the posting of a bond equal to the
estimated amount by which the NV
exceeds the U.S. price as shown above.
See section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act.
The suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until
further notice.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of
the Act, we have notified the
International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’)
of our final determination of sales at
LTFV. As our final determination is
affirmative, in accordance with section
735(b)(2) of the Act, within 45 days the
ITC will determine whether the
domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with
material injury, by reason of imports or
sales (or the likelihood of sales) for
importation of the subject merchandise.
If the ITC determines that material
injury or threat of material injury does
not exist, the proceeding will be
terminated and all securities posted will
be refunded or canceled. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist,
the Department will issue an
antidumping duty order directing CBP
to assess, upon further instruction by
the Department, antidumping duties on
all imports of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
Dated: February 20, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix
I. General Issues:
Comment 1: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Comment 2: Treatment of Drawing
Power as a Direct Material Input
Comment 3: Wire Rod & Round Bar
Comment 4: Hydrochloric Acid and
Trisodium Phosphate
II. Ningbo Yinzhou Issues
Comment 5: Application of Facts
Available for Ningbo Yinzhou
Comment 6: Ningbo Yinzhou and
Zhonghuan/Guorui Verification Report
Comment 7: Surrogate Value Selection
Galvanizing Surrogate Value
III. RMB/IFI Issues
Comment 8: Surrogate Values Packing
Strips, Buckles, and Coal
Comment 9: Limits to By–Product Offset
Comment 10: Minor Corrections for the
RMB/IFI Group
[FR Doc. E9–4248 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Advisory Committee on Earthquake
Hazards Reduction Meeting
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on
Earthquake Hazards Reduction (ACEHR
or Committee), will hold a meeting on
Wednesday, March 25, 2009 from 2 p.m.
to 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST).
The primary purpose of this meeting is
to review and finalize the Committee’s
draft reauthorization letter to the
Interagency Coordinating Committee
(ICC). The draft letter will be posted on
the NEHRP Web site at
https://nehrp.gov/. Interested members of
the public will be able to participate in
the meeting from remote locations by
calling into a central phone number.
DATES: The ACEHR will hold a meeting
on Wednesday, March 25, 2009, from 2
p.m. until 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time
(EST). The meeting will be open to the
public. Interested parties may
participate in the meeting from their
remote location.
ADDRESSES: Questions regarding the
meeting should be sent to National
Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program
Director, National Institute of Standards
and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail
Stop 8630, Gaithersburg, Maryland
20899–8630. For instructions on how to
participate in the meeting, please see
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Jack Hayes, National Earthquake
Hazards Reduction Program Director,
National Institute of Standards and
Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail
Stop 8630, Gaithersburg, Maryland
20899–8630. Dr. Hayes’ e-mail address
is jack.hayes@nist.gov and his phone
number is (301) 975–5640.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Committee was established in
accordance with the requirements of
Section 103 of the NEHRP
Reauthorization Act of 2004 (Pub. L.
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8907-8911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4248]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-570-932)
Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China:
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 27, 2009.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') has determined
that certain steel threaded rod (``STR'') from the People's Republic of
China (``PRC'') is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States
at less than fair value (``LTFV'') as provided in section 735 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``Act''). The final dumping margins for
this investigation are listed in the ``Final Determination Margins''
section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobby Wong or Toni Dach, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC
20230; telephone (202) 482-0409 or (202) 482-1655, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Case History
On October 8, 2008, the Department published in the Federal
Register its preliminary determination. See Certain Steel Threaded Rod
from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 58931 (October 8, 2008) (``Preliminary
Determination''). On October 27, 2008, the Department published in the
Federal Register its amended preliminary determination that STR from
the PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at
LTFV. See Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of
China: Amended Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 73 FR 63693 (October 27,
2008) (``Amended Preliminary Determination'').\1\ As provided in
section 782(i) of the Act, we verified the information submitted by: 1)
RMB Fasteners Ltd. and IFI & Morgan Ltd.\2\ (the ``RMB/IFI Group'')
from November 3-4, 2008, and Jiaxing Brother Standard Part Co.\3\
(``Jiaxing Brother''), its affiliated producer from November 6-7, 2008;
2) Ningbo Yinzhou Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.\4\ (``Ningbo Yinzhou'') from
November 13-14, 2008, and Haiyan Zhonghuan Fastener Factory
(``Zhonghuan''), one of Ningbo Yingzhou's manufacturers, and Zhejiang
Guorui Industry Co., Ltd.\5\ (``Guorui''), one of Ningbo Yinzhou's
suppliers from November 10-12, 2008; and 3) Shanghai Prime Machinery
Co., Ltd.\6\ (``Shanghai Prime''), a separate rate respondent, on
November 17, 2008. On December 12, 2008, Vulcan Threaded Products
(``Petitioner'') and the RMB/IFI Group placed new factual information
on the record regarding surrogate valuation, and submitted rebuttal
comments on December 22, 2008. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(i),
we invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Determination. On
January 16, 2009, the Department received case briefs from the RMB/IFI
Group, Ningbo Yinzhou, and Petitioner. On January 23, 2009, we received
rebuttal briefs from Petitioner and the RMB/IFI Group. On November 6
and 7, 2008, Petitioner and the RMB/IFI Group submitted requests for a
hearing, respectively. On January 22, 2009, Petitioner and the RMB/IFI
Group withdrew their requests for a hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In the Amended Preliminary Determination, the Department
amended the Preliminary Determination to correct certain ministerial
errors with respect to the antidumping duty margin calculation for
RMB Fasteners Ltd. and IFI and Morgan Ltd.
\2\ See Memorandum to the File from Scot T. Fullerton, Program
Manager, and Toni Dach, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
regarding: ``Verification of the Sales Response of RMB Fasteners
Ltd. and IFI & Morgan Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China,''
dated January 6, 2009 (``RMB & IFI Verification Report'').
\3\ See Memorandum to the File from Scot T. Fullerton, Program
Manager, and Toni Dach, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
regarding: ``Verification of the Factors of Production Response of
Jiaxing Brother Standard Part Co. in the Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's
Republic of China,'' dated January 6, 2009 (``Brother Fastener
Verification Report'').
\4\ See Memorandum to the File from Scot T. Fullerton, Program
Manager, and Toni Dach, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
regarding: ``Verification of the Sales Response of Ningbo Yinzhou
Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China,''
dated January 6, 2009 (``Ningbo Yinzhou Verification Report'').
\5\ See Memorandum to the File from Scot T. Fullerton, Program
Manager, and Toni Dach, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
regarding: ``Verification of the Factors of Production Response of
Haiyan Zhonguan Fastener Factory and Zhejiang Guorui Industry Co.,
Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Steel Threaded
Rod from the People's Republic of China,'' dated January 6, 2009
(``Zhonghuan & Guorui Verification Report'').
\6\ See Memorandum to the File from Scot T. Fullerton, Program
Manager, and Toni Dach, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
regarding: ``Verification of the Separate Rate Response of Shanghai
Prime Machinery Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China,''
dated January 6, 2009 (``Shanghai Prime Separate Rate Verification
Report'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by the parties to
this investigation are addressed in the ``Certain Steel Threaded Rod
from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value,'' dated
concurrently with this notice, which is hereby adopted by this notice
in its entirety (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''). A list of the
issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in
the Central Records Unit in the main Commerce building, Room 1117, and
is accessible on the Web at https://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical
in content.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (``POI'') is July 1, 2007, through
December 31, 2007.
Scope of Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is steel threaded
rod. Steel threaded rod is certain threaded rod, bar, or studs, of
carbon quality steel, having a solid, circular cross section, of any
diameter, in any straight length, that have been forged, turned, cold
drawn, cold rolled, machine straightened, or otherwise cold finished,
and into which threaded grooves have been applied. In addition, the
steel threaded rod, bar, or studs subject to this investigation are non
headed and threaded along greater than 25 percent of their total
length. A variety of finishes or coatings, such as plain oil finish as
a temporary rust protectant, zinc coating (i.e., galvanized, whether by
electroplating or hot-dipping), paint, and other similar finishes and
coatings, may be applied to the merchandise.
Included in the scope of this investigation are steel threaded rod,
bar, or studs, in which: (1) iron predominates, by weight, over each of
the other contained elements; (2) the carbon content is 2 percent or
less, by weight; and (3) none of the elements
[[Page 8908]]
listed below exceeds the quantity, by weight, respectively indicated:
1.80 percent of manganese, or
1.50 percent of silicon, or
1.00 percent of copper, or
0.50 percent of aluminum, or
1.25 percent of chromium, or
0.30 percent of cobalt, or
0.40 percent of lead, or
1.25 percent of nickel, or
0.30 percent of tungsten, or
0.012 percent of boron, or
0.10 percent of molybdenum, or
0.10 percent of niobium, or
0.41 percent of titanium, or
0.15 percent of vanadium, or
0.15 percent of zirconium.
Steel threaded rod is currently classifiable under subheading
7318.15.5050 and 7318.15.5090 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise is dispositive.
Excluded from the scope of the investigation are: (a) threaded rod,
bar, or studs which are threaded only on one or both ends and the
threading covers 25 percent or less of the total length; and (b)
threaded rod, bar, or studs made to American Society for Testing and
Materials (``ASTM'') A193 Grade B7, ASTM A193 Grade B7M, ASTM A193
Grade B16, or ASTM A320 Grade L7.
Scope-HTSUS Modification
On September 22, 2008, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'')
informed the Department that on July 1, 2008, it amended the United
States Harmonized Tariff Schedule (``HTSUS'') category 7318.15.5060,
and replaced the category with two new HTSUS categories: 7318.15.5050
and 7318.15.5090. Therefore, the Department has modified the scope to
reflect the new HTSUS categories.
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on our findings at verification, and additional information
placed on the record of this investigation, we have made changes since
the Amended Preliminary Determination. As discussed further below, we
have applied total adverse facts available (``AFA'') to Ningbo Yinzhou
for purposes of this final determination. See Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 5.
Based on our analysis of information on the record of this
investigation, and comments received from the interested parties, we
have made changes to the margin calculations for the RMB/IFI Group. We
have revalued certain surrogate values used in the Amended Preliminary
Determination. The values that were modified for this final
determination are those for surrogate financial ratios, packing strips,
buckles, and coal. For further details see I&D Memo at Comment 6, and
Memorandum to the File from Bobby Wong, through Scot T. Fullerton,
Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, and James C. Doyle,
Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9; Certain Steel Threaded Rod from
the People's Republic of China: Surrogate Values for the Final
Determination, dated February 20, 2009 (``Final Surrogate Value
Memo'').
In addition, we have made certain company-specific changes since
the Amended Preliminary Determination. Specifically, we have
incorporated, where applicable, post-preliminary clarifications based
on a post-preliminary supplemental questionnaire and verification for
the RMB/IFI Group. For further details on these company-specific
changes, see Memorandum to the File, through Scot T. Fullerton, Program
Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, from Bobby Wong, Senior
International Trade Analyst, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, regarding
``Program Analysis for the Final Determination of Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic
of China,'' dated February 20, 2009 (``The RMB/IFI Group Analysis
Memorandum'').
Adverse Facts Available
Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides that the Department shall
apply ``facts otherwise available'' if, inter alia, an interested party
or any other person (A) withholds information that has been requested,
(B) fails to provide information within the deadlines established, or
in the form or manner requested by the Department, subject to
subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782 of the Act, (C) significantly
impedes a proceeding, or (D) provides information that cannot be
verified as provided by section 782(i) of the Act. Section 776(b) of
the Act provides further that the Department may use an adverse
inference when a party has failed to cooperate by not acting to the
best of its ability to comply with a request for information.
Pursuant to sections 776(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), and (D) of the Act, we
are applying facts otherwise available to Ningbo Yinzhou because it
withheld certain information that had been requested by the Department
which significantly impeded the Department's investigation. Ningbo
Yinzhou failed to provide information regarding certain factors of
production (``FOP'') in the form and manner requested by the
Department. Ningbo Yinzhou withheld certain information that was
specifically requested by the Department and significantly impeded the
proceeding by not providing accurate or complete responses to the
Department's questions regarding certain FOPs and the sales
reconciliation. See Verification of the Sales Response of Ningbo
Yinzhou Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation
of Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the People's Republic of China,
dated January 6, 2009 at 2, 6-8, and 10-11; and Ningbo Yinzhou's
response to the Department's First Supplemental Sections C and D
Questionnaire, dated September 8, 2008, at 19. Additionally,
information discovered at verification directly contradicted
information contained in Ningbo Yinzhou's questionnaire responses.\7\
Significant delays were experienced by the Department in completing
verification procedures, which prevented the completion of some
verification procedures. Due to the insufficiency of the respondent's
record keeping, numerous verification procedures could not be
completed. For these reasons, the Department was unable to verify
certain statements in Ningbo Yinzhou's questionnaire responses for
which the Department sought verification. See Ningbo Yinzhou
Verification Report and Zhonghuan/Guorui Verification Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For example, the Department specifically asked Ningbo
Yinzhou in its August 21, 2008, supplemental questionnaire whether
any FOPs other than those reported were consumed by Zhonghuan in
production of the subject merchandise. Ningbo Yinzhou reported in
its September 8, 2008, response that all factors consumed by
Zhonghuan in the production of the subject merchandise were
reported. We discovered at verification that this statement was not
correct, and unreported factors were consumed in the production of
the subject merchandise. Additionally, Ningbo Yinzhou provided a
sales reconciliation to the Department on August 8, 2008, that they
claimed reconciled its U.S. sales database to its financial
statements. At verification, we discovered that the sales
reconciliation did not tie the U.S. sales database to Ningbo
Yinzhou's financial statements. For additional information and
examples of situations where verification findings contradicted
Ningbo Yinzhou's questionnaire responses, see Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, based on the record evidence and pursuant to section
776(b) of the Act, the Department has determined that Ningbo Yinzhou
did not cooperate to the best of its ability to comply with the
Department's requests for information. In particular, the Department
gave specific instructions in our questionnaires and the verification
outline as to the purpose of and directions for submission and
[[Page 8909]]
verification of the reconciliation of Ningbo Yinzhou's U.S. sales
database to Ningbo Yinzhou's accounting records, and proper reporting
of all FOPs for all models. Despite these extensive instructions,
provided numerous times over the course of the investigation, Ningbo
Yinzhou failed to provide the Department with adequate information and
supporting documentation to fully verify its responses to the
Department's questionnaires. In addition, despite multiple
opportunities presented by the Department, Ningbo Yinzhou failed to
report certain FOPs and failed to report FOPs for each model in the
U.S. sales database. For a detailed description of each of the
deficiencies, see Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 5.
Surrogate Country
In the Preliminary Determination and unchanged in the Amended
Preliminary Determination, we stated that we had selected India as the
appropriate surrogate country to use in this investigation for the
following reasons: (1) it is a significant producer of comparable
merchandise; (2) it is at a level of economic development comparable to
that of the PRC; and (3) we have reliable data from India that we can
use to value FOPs. See Preliminary Determination. We received no
comments on our surrogate country selection. Accordingly, for the final
determination, we made no changes to our finding with respect to the
selection of India as a surrogate country.
Separate Rates
In proceedings involving non-market economy (``NME'') countries,
the Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies
within the country are subject to government control and, thus, should
be assigned a single antidumping duty deposit rate. It is the
Department's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to
an investigation in an NME country this single rate unless an exporter
can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent so as to be
entitled to a separate rate. See Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Sparklers from the People's Republic of China, 56 FR
20588, 20589 (May 6, 1991), as amplified by Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from
the People's Republic of China, 59 FR at 22585, 22587 (May 2, 1994),
and 19 CFR 351.107(d).
In the Preliminary Determination and unchanged in the Amended
Preliminary Determination, we found that Shanghai Recky, Suntec
Industries, Hangzhou Grand, Shanghai Prime, Jianxing Xinyue, CPII,
Jiashan Zhongsheng, Haiyan Dayu, and New Oriental (hereinafter referred
to as ``Separate Rate Companies''), and Ningbo Yinzhou, a mandatory
respondent, have provided company-specific information to demonstrate
that they operate independently of de jure and de facto government
control, and therefore satisfy the standards for the assignment of a
separate rate.
No party has commented on the eligibility of these companies for
separate rate status. For the final determination, we continue to find
that the evidence placed on the record of this investigation by these
companies demonstrates both a de jure and de facto absence of
government control with respect to their exports of the merchandise
under investigation. Thus, we continue to find that they are eligible
for separate rate status. Normally, the separate rate is determined
based on the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for
exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding de minimis
margins or margins based entirely on AFA. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of
the Act.
In the Preliminary Determination and unchanged in the Amended
Preliminary Determination, the Department stated that it could not deny
the RMB/IFI Group separate rate status because the Department did not
ask specifically for information relating to the RMB/IFI Group's
separate rate eligibility. However, subsequent to the Preliminary
Determination, on October 22, 2008, in response to the Department's
inquiry, the RMB/IFI Group reported that it is a wholly foreign-owned
company, and at verification the Department found no discrepancies in
the RMB/IFI Group's responses to the Department's separate rate
questions. As the RMB/IFI Group is wholly foreign-owned, a separate
rate analysis is not necessary to determine whether it is independent
from government control. See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Creatine Monohydrate From the People's Republic
of China, 64 FR 71104, 71105 (December 20, 1999) (the respondent was
wholly foreign-owned, and thus, qualified for a separate rate).
Consequently, for the final determination we find that the evidence
placed on the record of this investigation by the RMB/IFI Group
demonstrates that it is eligible for a separate rate.
In the Preliminary Determination and unchanged in the Amended
Preliminary Determination, the Department assigned to nine exporter/
producer combinations that qualified for a separate rate a weighted-
average margin based on the experience of the mandatory respondents,
excluding any de minimis or zero rates or rates based on total AFA. See
Preliminary Determination. For the final determination, because the
Department based the rate for Ningbo Yinzhou on total AFA, the
Department has applied the RMB/IFI Group's calculated rate for purposes
of establishing a separate rate. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.
Therefore, the Department will assign the RMB/IFI Group's calculated
rate as the separate rate for the nine exporter/producer combinations.
This rate is corroborated, to the extent practicable, for the reasons
stated below. See ``Corroboration'' section below.
The PRC-Wide Rate
In the Preliminary Determination and unchanged in the Amended
Preliminary Determination, the Department found that certain companies
did not respond to our requests for information. See Preliminary
Determination, 73 FR at 58936. In the Preliminary Determination we
treated these PRC producers/exporters as part of the PRC-wide entity
because they did not demonstrate that they operate free of government
control over their export activities. Because these producers/exporters
did not provide information regarding their export activities, the
Department has determined that application of facts available (``FA'')
is warranted. No additional information was placed on the record with
respect to these companies after the Preliminary Determination.
Therefore, pursuant to section 776(a)(2)(A) of the Act, the Department
continues to find that the use of FA is appropriate to determine the
PRC-wide rate.
Section 776(b) of the Act provides that, in selecting from among
the facts otherwise available, the Department may employ an adverse
inference if an interested party fails to cooperate by not acting to
the best of its ability to comply with requests for information. See
Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain
Cold-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality Steel Products From the Russian
Federation, 65 FR 5510, 5518 (February 4, 2000). See also Statement of
Administrative Action accompanying the URAA, H.R. Rep. No. 103-316,
vol. 1, at 870 (1994) (``SAA''). We determined that, because the PRC-
wide entity did not respond to our request for information, it has
failed to cooperate to the best of its ability. Therefore, the
Department finds that, in selecting from among the facts otherwise
available, an adverse inference is appropriate for the PRC-wide entity.
[[Page 8910]]
Because we begin with the presumption that all companies within an
NME country are subject to government control and because only the
companies listed under the ``Final Determination Margins'' section
below have overcome that presumption, we are applying a single
antidumping rate (i.e., the PRC-wide entity rate) to all other
exporters of subject merchandise from the PRC. Such companies did not
demonstrate entitlement to a separate rate. See, e.g., Synthetic Indigo
From the People's Republic of China; Notice of Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 65 FR 25706 (May 3, 2000). The PRC-wide
entity rate applies to all entries of subject merchandise except for
entries from the respondents which are listed in the ``Final
Determination Margins'' section below.
In the Preliminary Determination and unchanged in the Amended
Preliminary Determination, we assigned to the PRC-wide entity the
highest rate calculated from the petition, 206.00 percent. See
Preliminary Determination, 73 FR at 58936. We received no comments on
this rate. Therefore, for the final determination, we have continued to
assign to the PRC-wide entity the rate of 206.00 percent.
Corroboration
Section 776(c) of the Act provides that, when the Department relies
on secondary information in using the facts otherwise available, it
must, to the extent practicable, corroborate that information from
independent sources that are reasonably at its disposal. We have
interpreted ``corroborate'' to mean that we will, to the extent
practicable, examine the reliability and relevance of the information
submitted. See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and
Unfinished, From Japan, and Tapered Roller Bearings, Four Inches or
Less in Outside Diameter, and Components Thereof, From Japan;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and
Partial Termination of Administrative Reviews, 61 FR 57391, 57392
(November 6, 1996), unchanged in Notice of Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Cold-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon-Quality
Steel Products From Brazil, 65 FR 5554, 5568 (February 4, 2000); see,
e.g., Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and
Unfinished, From Japan, and Tapered Roller Bearings, Four Inches or
Less in Outside Diameter, and Components Thereof, From Japan; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Termination in
Part, 62 FR 11825 (March 13, 1997).
To corroborate the AFA margin we have selected, we compared that
margin to the margins calculated for the RMB/IFI Group. We found that
the margin of 206.00 percent has probative value because it is in the
range of margins calculated for the RMB/IFI Group. See October 1, 2008,
Memorandum to the File, From Bobby Wong, Through Scot T. Fullerton,
regarding: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Steel Threaded Rod
from the People's Republic of China: RMB/IFI Program Analysis for the
Preliminary Determination, at 1. Accordingly, we find that the rate of
206.00 percent is corroborated within the meaning of section 776(c) of
the Act.
Combination Rates
In the Preliminary Determination, the Department stated that it
would calculate combination rates for the respondents that are eligible
for a separate rate in this investigation. See Preliminary
Determination, 73 FR at 58931. This change in practice is described in
Policy Bulletin 05.1, available at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/. Policy
Bulletin 05.1, states:
{w{time} hile continuing the practice of assigning separate rates
only to exporters, all separate rates that the Department will now
assign in its NME investigations will be specific to those producers
that supplied the exporter during the period of investigation. Note,
however, that one rate is calculated for the exporter and all of the
producers which supplied subject merchandise to it during the period of
investigation. This practice applies both to mandatory respondents
receiving an individually calculated separate rate as well as the pool
of non-investigated firms receiving the weighted-average of the
individually calculated rates. This practice is referred to as the
application of ``combination rates'' because such rates apply to
specific combinations of exporters and one or more producers. The cash-
deposit rate assigned to an exporter will apply only to merchandise
both exported by the firm in question and produced by a firm that
supplied the exporter during the period of investigation.
See Policy Bulletin 05.1, ``Separate Rates Practice and Application
of Combination Rates in Antidumping Investigations Involving Non-Market
Economy Countries.''
Final Determination Margins
We determine that the following percentage weighted-average margins
exist for the POI:
Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the PRC
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Exporter Producer Margin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RMB Fasteners Ltd., and IFI & Morgan Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co., Ltd. (aka Jiaxing 55.16
Ltd. (``RMB/IFI Group'')............. Brother Standard Parts Co., Ltd.)
Ningbo Yinzhou Foreign Trade Co. Ltd.. Zhejiang Guorui Industry Co., Ltd.; or Ningbo Daxie 206.00[percnt]
Chuofeng Industrial Development Co. Ltd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates Entities: Exporter Producer Margin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai Recky International Trading Shanghai Xiangrong International Trading Co., Ltd.; 55.16
Co., Ltd............................. Shanghai Xianglong International Trading Co., Ltd.;
Pighu City Zhapu Screw Cap Factory; or Jiaxing
Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd.
Suntec Industries Co., Ltd............ Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd.; or Haiyan 55.16
County No. 1 Fasteners Factory
Hangzhou Grand Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd... Zhapu Creative Standard Parts Material Co., Ltd. 55.16
Shanghai Prime Machinery Co. Ltd...... Haiyan Yida Fasteners Co., Ltd.; or Jiaxing Xinyue 55.16
Standard Part Co., Ltd.
Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd. Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd. 55.16
[[Page 8911]]
Certified Products International Inc.. Jiashan Zhongsheng Metal Products Co., Ltd.; or 55.16
Jiaxing Xinyue Standard Part Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang New Oriental Fastener Co., Zhejiang New Oriental Fastener Co., Ltd. 55.16
Ltd..................................
Jiashan Zhongsheng Metal Products Co., Jiashan Zhongsheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. 55.16
Ltd..................................
Haiyan Dayu Fasteners Co., Ltd........ Haiyan Dayu Fasteners Co., Ltd. 55.16
PRC-wide Entity....................... .................................................... 206.00[percnt]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
We will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to
continue the suspension of liquidation required by section 735(c)(1)(B)
of the Act, of all entries of subject merchandise from the RMB/IFI
Group, Ningbo Yinzhou, the Separate Rate Companies, and the PRC-wide
entity entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or
after October 8, 2008, the date of publication of the Preliminary
Determination. CBP shall continue to require a cash deposit or the
posting of a bond equal to the estimated amount by which the NV exceeds
the U.S. price as shown above. See section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act.
The suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until
further notice.
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we have notified the
International Trade Commission (``ITC'') of our final determination of
sales at LTFV. As our final determination is affirmative, in accordance
with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, within 45 days the ITC will
determine whether the domestic industry in the United States is
materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of
imports or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of the
subject merchandise. If the ITC determines that material injury or
threat of material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be
terminated and all securities posted will be refunded or canceled. If
the ITC determines that such injury does exist, the Department will
issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further
instruction by the Department, antidumping duties on all imports of the
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of
liquidation.
Notification Regarding APO
This notice also serves as a reminder to the parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 20, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
I. General Issues:
Comment 1: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Comment 2: Treatment of Drawing Power as a Direct Material Input
Comment 3: Wire Rod & Round Bar
Comment 4: Hydrochloric Acid and Trisodium Phosphate
II. Ningbo Yinzhou Issues
Comment 5: Application of Facts Available for Ningbo Yinzhou
Comment 6: Ningbo Yinzhou and Zhonghuan/Guorui Verification Report
Comment 7: Surrogate Value Selection Galvanizing Surrogate Value
III. RMB/IFI Issues
Comment 8: Surrogate Values Packing Strips, Buckles, and Coal
Comment 9: Limits to By-Product Offset
Comment 10: Minor Corrections for the RMB/IFI Group
[FR Doc. E9-4248 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S