Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand: Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review, 8904-8905 [E9-4239]
Download as PDF
8904
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign–Trade Zones Board
[Docket 7–2009]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Foreign–Trade Zone 57 - Mecklenburg
County, NC, Application for Subzone
Status, FMS Enterprises USA, Inc.
(Para–Aramid UD Shield)
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign–Trade Zones Board (the
Board) by the North Carolina
Department of Commerce, grantee of
FTZ 57, requesting special–purpose
subzone status for the para–aramid UD
shield manufacturing plant of FMS
Enterprises USA, Inc. (FMS), located in
Lincolnton, North Carolina. The
application was submitted pursuant to
the provisions of the Foreign–Trade
Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–
81u), and the regulations of the Board
(15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed
on February 20, 2009.
The FMS facility (40 employees/23
acres/57,600 sq.ft.) is located at 2001
Kawai Road in Lincolnton, North
Carolina. The plant is used to produce
para–aramid UD shield tape (up to 3
million pounds per year) for export and
the domestic market. The manufacturing
process involves layering and bonding
of para–aramid fibers under heat and
pressure to create finished composite
shield tape. Foreign–origin para–aramid
fiber (HTSUS 5402.11, duty rate: 8.8%)
is used as the primary production input,
which represents up to 75 percent of
finished product value.
FTZ procedures would exempt FMS
from customs duty payments on the
foreign para–aramid fiber used in export
production (about 25% of annual
shipments). On domestic shipments, the
company could be able to elect the duty
rate that applies to finished para–
aramidUD shield tape (duty free) for the
foreign material input noted above. The
application indicates that the savings
from FTZ procedures would help
improve the facility’s international
competitiveness.In accordance with the
Board’s regulations, Pierre Duy of the
FTZ Staff is designated examiner to
investigate the application and report to
the Board.
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions (original
and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
following address: Office of the
Executive Secretary, Room 2111, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230–0002. The closing period for
receipt of comments is April 28, 2009.
Rebuttal comments in response to
material submitted during the foregoing
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:43 Feb 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
period may be submitted during the
subsequent 15-day period to May 13,
2009.
A copy of the application will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Foreign–Trade Zones
Board’s Executive Secretary at the
address listed above and in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s
website, which is accessible via
www.trade.gov/ftz. For further
information, contact Pierre Duy at:
pierrelduy@ita.doc.gov, or (202) 482–
1378.
Dated: February 20, 2009.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–4237 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–549–807
Certain Carbon Steel Butt–Weld Pipe
Fittings From Thailand: Final Results
of Changed–Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) has determined,
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), that
Awaji Materia (Thailand) Co., Ltd. is the
successor–in-interest to Awaji Sangyo
(Thailand) Co., Ltd. (AST) and, as a
result, should be accorded the same
treatment previously accorded to AST
with respect to the antidumping duty
order on certain carbon steel butt–weld
pipe fittings from Thailand.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 27, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Case or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3174 and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 6, 1992, the Department
published an antidumping duty order
on pipe fittings from Thailand in which
it stated that AST was excluded from
the order due to its de minimis margin
in the less–than-fair–value
investigation. See Antidumping Duty
Order; Certain Carbon Steel Butt–Weld
Pipe Fittings From Thailand, 57 FR
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29702 (July 6, 1992); see also Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Certain Carbon Steel Butt–
Weld Pipe Fittings from Thailand, 57 FR
21065 (May 18, 1992).1 On November
18, 2008, the Department received a
request for a changed–circumstances
review of this order from AMT to
determine if, for purposes of the
antidumping law, AMT is the
successor–in-interest to AST. On
January 14, 2009, the Department
published the notice of initiation for
this changed–circumstances review and
preliminarily found that AMT is the
successor–in-interest to AST and should
be treated as such for antidumping
purposes. See Notice of Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Changed–
Circumstances Antidumping Duty
Review: Certain Carbon Steel Butt–Weld
Pipe Fittings From Thailand, 74 FR
2048 (January 14, 2009) (Preliminary
Results). We invited interested parties to
comment on the preliminary results. We
received comments from AMT and Silbo
Industries, Inc.2
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order covers certain
pipe fittings from Thailand. They are
defined as carbon steel butt–weld pipe
fittings, having an inside diameter of
less than 14 inches, imported in either
finished or unfinished form. These
formed or forged pipe fittings are used
to join sections in piping systems where
conditions require permanent, welded
connections, as distinguished from
fittings based on other fastening
methods (e.g., threaded, grooved, or
bolted fittings). These imports are
currently classifiable under subheading
7307.93.30 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description
remains dispositive as to the scope of
the order.
Analysis of Comment Received
The issue raised in the case briefs by
parties in this review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
from John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy
1 As observed in the November 18, 2008, request
from AMT, exports of subject merchandise of AST
were also the subject of a subsequent investigation
in which the International Trade Commission
concluded that the exports did not result in the
material injury or threat of material injury to the
U.S. industry or in material retardation of the
establishment of an industry in the United States.
See Certain Carbon Steel Butt–Weld Pipe Fittings
From France, India, Israel, Malaysia, The Republic
of Korea, Thailand, The United Kingdom, and
Venezuela, 60 FR 18611 (April 12, 1995).
2 Silbo Industries Inc. is an importer of certain
carbon steel butt–weld pipe fittings produced by
AMT.
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Notices
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
dated February 20, 2009 (Decision
Memo), which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The Decision Memo, which is a
public document, is on file in the
Central Records Unit, main Department
of Commerce building, Room 1117, and
is accessible on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision Memo
are identical in content.
Dated: February 20, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Final Results of Changed–
Circumstances Review
[Application No. 08–00009]
[FR Doc. E9–4239 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Export Trade Certificate of Review
For the reasons stated in the
Preliminary Results, we continue to find
that AMT is the successor–in-interest to
AST. We will apply this determination
retroactively and will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
liquidate, without regard to
antidumping duties, all unliquidated
entries entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
August 1, 2006, the date of AST’s name
change to AMT. See Stainless Steel Wire
Rod from Italy: Notice of Final Results
of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Review, 71 FR
24643, 24644 (April 26, 2006); see also
Certain Hot–Rolled Lead and Bismuth
Carbon Steel Products from the United
Kingdom: Final Results of Changed–
Circumstances Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 64 FR 66880, 66881 (Nov. 30,
1999).
Notification
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216
and 351.221.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Appendix
1. Application of the Final Results
Retroactively
ACTION: Notice of Issuance of an Export
Trade Certificate of Review to Golden
Tree Trading Company Application
(Application No. 08–00009).
SUMMARY: On February 18, 2009, the
U.S. Department of Commerce issued an
Export Trade Certificate of Review to
Golden Tree Trading Company
(‘‘GTTC’’). This notice summarizes the
conduct for which certification has been
granted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Anspacher, Director, Export
Trading Company Affairs, International
Trade Administration, by telephone at
(202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free
number) or e-mail at oetca@ita.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce to issue Export
Trade Certificates of Review. The
regulations implementing Title III are
found at 15 CFR part 325 (2006).
Export Trading Company Affairs
(‘‘ETCA’’) is issuing this notice pursuant
to 15 CFR section 325.6(b), which
requires the Secretary of Commerce to
publish a summary of the certification
in the Federal Register. Under Section
305(a) of the Act and 15 CFR 325.11(a),
any person aggrieved by the Secretary’s
determination may, within 30 days of
the date of this notice, bring an action
in any appropriate district court of the
United States to set aside the
determination on the ground that the
determination is erroneous.
Description of Certified Conduct
GTTC is certified to engage in the
Export Trade Activities and Methods of
Operation described below in the
following Export Trade and Export
Markets.
I. Export Trade
1. Products
All Products.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:39 Feb 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8905
2. Services
All Services.
3. Technology Rights
Technology rights that relate to
Products and Services, including, but
not limited to, patents, trademarks,
copyrights, and trade secrets.
4. Export Trade Facilitation Services (as
They Relate to the Export of Products,
Services, and Technology Rights)
Export Trade Facilitation Services,
including, but not limited to,
professional services in the areas of
government relations and assistance
with state and federal programs; foreign
trade and business protocol; consulting;
market research and analysis; collection
of information on trade opportunities;
marketing; negotiations; joint ventures;
shipping; export management; export
licensing; advertising; documentation
and services related to compliance with
customs requirements; insurance and
financing; trade show exhibitions;
organizational development;
management and labor strategies;
transfer of technology; transportation
services; and facilitating the formation
of shippers’ associations.
II. Export Markets
The Export Markets include all parts
of the world except the United States
(the fifty states of the United States, the
District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam,
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory
of the Pacific Islands).
III. Export Trade Activities and Methods
of Operation
1. With respect to the export of
Products and Services, licensing of
Technology Rights and provision of
Export Trade Facilitation Services,
GTTC, subject to the terms and
conditions listed below, may:
a. Provide and/or arrange for the
provisions of Export Trade Facilitation
Services and engage in promotional and
marketing activities;
b. Collect information on trade
opportunities in the Export Markets and
distribute such information to clients;
c. Enter into exclusive and/or nonexclusive licensing and/or sales
agreements with Suppliers for the
export of Products, Services, and/or
Technology Rights to Export Markets;
d. Enter into exclusive and/or nonexclusive agreements with distributors
and/or sales representatives in Export
Markets;
e. Allocate export sales or divide
Export Markets among Suppliers for the
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 38 (Friday, February 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8904-8905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4239]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-549-807
Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand: Final
Results of Changed-Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) has determined,
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), that Awaji Materia (Thailand) Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-
interest to Awaji Sangyo (Thailand) Co., Ltd. (AST) and, as a result,
should be accorded the same treatment previously accorded to AST with
respect to the antidumping duty order on certain carbon steel butt-weld
pipe fittings from Thailand.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 27, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Case or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3174 and (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 6, 1992, the Department published an antidumping duty order
on pipe fittings from Thailand in which it stated that AST was excluded
from the order due to its de minimis margin in the less-than-fair-value
investigation. See Antidumping Duty Order; Certain Carbon Steel Butt-
Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand, 57 FR 29702 (July 6, 1992); see also
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Carbon
Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Thailand, 57 FR 21065 (May 18,
1992).\1\ On November 18, 2008, the Department received a request for a
changed-circumstances review of this order from AMT to determine if,
for purposes of the antidumping law, AMT is the successor-in-interest
to AST. On January 14, 2009, the Department published the notice of
initiation for this changed-circumstances review and preliminarily
found that AMT is the successor-in-interest to AST and should be
treated as such for antidumping purposes. See Notice of Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Changed-Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review:
Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand, 74 FR 2048
(January 14, 2009) (Preliminary Results). We invited interested parties
to comment on the preliminary results. We received comments from AMT
and Silbo Industries, Inc.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As observed in the November 18, 2008, request from AMT,
exports of subject merchandise of AST were also the subject of a
subsequent investigation in which the International Trade Commission
concluded that the exports did not result in the material injury or
threat of material injury to the U.S. industry or in material
retardation of the establishment of an industry in the United
States. See Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From
France, India, Israel, Malaysia, The Republic of Korea, Thailand,
The United Kingdom, and Venezuela, 60 FR 18611 (April 12, 1995).
\2\ Silbo Industries Inc. is an importer of certain carbon steel
butt-weld pipe fittings produced by AMT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The scope of the order covers certain pipe fittings from Thailand.
They are defined as carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings, having an
inside diameter of less than 14 inches, imported in either finished or
unfinished form. These formed or forged pipe fittings are used to join
sections in piping systems where conditions require permanent, welded
connections, as distinguished from fittings based on other fastening
methods (e.g., threaded, grooved, or bolted fittings). These imports
are currently classifiable under subheading 7307.93.30 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description remains dispositive as to the scope of the
order.
Analysis of Comment Received
The issue raised in the case briefs by parties in this review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum from John M. Andersen,
Acting Deputy
[[Page 8905]]
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated February 20, 2009 (Decision Memo), which is
hereby adopted by this notice. The Decision Memo, which is a public
document, is on file in the Central Records Unit, main Department of
Commerce building, Room 1117, and is accessible on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memo are identical in content.
Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review
For the reasons stated in the Preliminary Results, we continue to
find that AMT is the successor-in-interest to AST. We will apply this
determination retroactively and will instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to liquidate, without regard to antidumping duties,
all unliquidated entries entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after August 1, 2006, the date of AST's name change
to AMT. See Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Italy: Notice of Final
Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review, 71 FR 24643,
24644 (April 26, 2006); see also Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth
Carbon Steel Products from the United Kingdom: Final Results of
Changed-Circumstances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 64 FR 66880, 66881 (Nov. 30, 1999).
Notification
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written notification of
the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221.
Dated: February 20, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix
1. Application of the Final Results Retroactively
[FR Doc. E9-4239 Filed 2-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S