Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by New York Stock Exchange LLC Amending Certain NYSE Rules To Reflect That Designated Market Makers on the Exchange No Longer Act as Agents for Orders Entered on the Exchange, 8600-8603 [E9-3980]
Download as PDF
8600
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 25, 2009 / Notices
amend Chapter VII, Section 12, which
currently provides that an Options
Participant may not execute as principal
against orders on the limit order book
they represent as agent unless: (a)
Agency orders are first exposed on NOM
for at least three seconds, or (b) the
Options Participant has been bidding or
offering on NOM for at least three
seconds prior to receiving an agency
order that is executable against such bid
or offer. In addition, Options
Participants must expose orders they
represent as agent for at least three
seconds before such orders may be
automatically executed, in whole or in
part, against orders solicited from
members and non-member brokerdealers to transact with such orders.
Under the proposal, these exposure
periods would be reduced to one
second.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After carefully reviewing the
proposed rule change, the Commission
finds that the proposal is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.) 5 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,6 which, among other
things, requires that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating transactions in securities,
to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest. The Commission
also finds that the proposed rule change
is consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the
Act,7 which requires that the rules of an
exchange not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
The Commission believes that, given
the electronic environment of NASDAQ,
reducing each of these exposure periods
from three seconds to one second could
facilitate the prompt execution of
orders, while continuing to provide
market participants with an opportunity
to compete for exposed bids and offers.
To substantiate that NASDAQ members
could receive, process, and
5 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:09 Feb 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
communicate a response back to
NASDAQ within one second, NASDAQ
stated that it distributed a survey to all
NOM Options Participants. NASDAQ
stated that the survey results indicated
that it typically takes not more than 250
milliseconds for members to receive,
process, and respond to broadcast
messages that would be affected by the
proposal. NASDAQ also stated that all
eight members that responded to the
survey indicated that reducing the
exposure period to one second would
not impair their ability to participate in
orders affected by the proposal. Based
on NASDAQ’s statements regarding the
survey results, the Commission believes
that market participants should
continue to have opportunities to
compete for exposed bids and offers
within a one second exposure period.
Accordingly, the Commission believes
that it is consistent with the Act for
NASDAQ to reduce the order handling
and exposure times discussed herein
from three seconds to one second.
The Commission finds good cause to
approve the proposed rule change prior
to the thirtieth day after publication for
comment in the Federal Register. The
Commission notes that the proposed
rule change was noticed for a fifteen-day
comment period, and no comments
were received. The Commission
believes that NASDAQ has provided
reasonable support for its belief that its
market participants would continue to
have an opportunity to compete for
exposed bids and offers if the exposure
periods were reduced to one second as
proposed. Finally, the Commission also
notes that the proposed rule change is
similar to recently approved proposals
submitted by the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated, the
International Securities Exchange, LLC,
and NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.8
Therefore, the Commission finds good
cause, consistent with Section 19(b)(2)
of the Act,9 to approve the proposed
rule change on an accelerated basis.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,10 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NASDAQ–
2009–005), as modified by Amendment
No. 1, be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58088
(July 2, 2008), 73 FR 39747 (July 10, 2008) (SR–
CBOE–2008–16); 58224 (July 25, 2008), 73 FR
44303 (July 30, 2008) (SR–ISE–2007–94); and 59081
(December 11, 2008), 73 FR 76432 (December 16,
2008).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–4038 Filed 2–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–59415; File No. SR–NYSE–
2009–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change by New York
Stock Exchange LLC Amending
Certain NYSE Rules To Reflect That
Designated Market Makers on the
Exchange No Longer Act as Agents for
Orders Entered on the Exchange
February 18, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on February
4, 2009, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
certain NYSE rules to reflect that
Designated Market Makers (‘‘DMMs’’)
on the Exchange will no longer act as
agents for orders entered on the
Exchange.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at https://www.nyse.com, the
Exchange, and the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
1 15
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 25, 2009 / Notices
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Through this filing, the Exchange
proposes to amend certain NYSE rules
to reflect that the Designated Market
Makers (‘‘DMMs’’) no longer have
agency responsibilities for orders
entered on the NYSE Display Book®
(‘‘Display Book’’).4
The Exchange notes that parallel
changes are proposed to be made to the
rules of the NYSE Alternext Exchange
(formerly the American Stock
Exchange).5
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Background
On June 12, 2008, the NYSE filed a set
of proposed rule changes designed to
transform its market structure and
reinforce the NYSE as the premier
venue for price discovery, liquidity,
competitive quotes and price
improvement.6 That and other filings 7
formed the core initiatives submitted by
the Exchange to reinforce its dynamic
and competitive marketplace.
As outlined in SR–NYSE–2008–46
(the ‘‘New Market Model filing’’), the
changes to the Exchange’s marketplace
included the replacement of Exchange
specialists with DMMs. The function of
the DMM is substantially different from
the manner in which specialists
`
functioned vis-a-vis the relationship
between Exchange order givers and
representation of these orders in the
marketplace. DMMs no longer receive
copies of orders entered in Exchange
systems prior to the orders publication
to all market participants by Display
4 The Display Book® system is an order
management and execution facility. The Display
Book system receives and displays orders to the
DMM, contains the Book, and provides a
mechanism to execute and report transactions and
publish results to the Consolidated Tape. The
Display Book system is connected to a number of
other Exchange systems for the purposes of
comparison, surveillance, and reporting
information to customers and other market data and
national market systems.
5 See SR–NYSE Alternext–2009–09 (to be filed
February 4, 2009).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58184
(July 17, 2008), 73 FR 42853 (July 23, 2008) (SR–
NYSE–2008–46).
7 See for example, Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 58052 (June 27, 2008), 73 FR 38274
(July 3, 2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–45) (amending
NYSE Rule 98); see also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 58363 (August 14, 2008), 73 FR 49514
(August 21, 2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–52) (amending
the NYSE allocation policy).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:09 Feb 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
Book. Similarly, DMMs do not have a
negative obligation which would require
the DMM to yield trading for the DMM
unit’s proprietary account in order to
allow public orders to be executed
against each other. DMMs therefore
trade on parity with all market
participants.
Incoming orders to buy and sell
submitted to the Exchange are eligible
for automatic quoting and immediate
and automatic execution. Instead of the
DMM, the NYSE Display Book is
responsible for tracking the liquidity
available at each specified price point.
NYSE systems automatically review the
liquidity available on the Display Book
for execution and then using
sophisticated execution logic access the
necessary liquidity to consummate
trades. Exchange systems report
executions to the entering parties,
update the quote and process order
cancellations.
Although the DMM no longer receives
order by order information, he or she is
still responsible for the execution of
manual transactions on the Exchange
including opening and re-opening
transactions, closing transactions, block
transactions, gap quote situations and
when trading reaches LRPs that would
lock or cross the market.8 DMMs are
responsible for choosing the price 9 and
the executions of the orders at that price
during those specific situations.
In the current NYSE trading
environment, the DMM no longer
functions as an agent for orders on the
Display Book because the DMM does
not control order by order information.
As such the Exchange proposes through
this filing to amend legacy rules that
retain the concept of the Exchange
market maker as agent.
Proposed Rule Changes
Certain Exchange rules contain
language that refers to the DMM
‘‘holding,’’ ‘‘receiving,’’ and/or
‘‘accepting’’ orders. These concepts
were consistent with the role performed
by former specialist but are inconsistent
with the role of the DMM. The Exchange
therefore proposes to amend NYSE
Rules 13 (‘‘Definitions of Orders’’), 91
8 See
NYSE Rule 104(a)(2)–(5).
an opening and reopening trade, Display
Book will verify that all interest that must be
executed in the opening or reopening can be
executed at the price chosen by the DMM. If all the
interest that must be executed in the transaction
cannot be executed at that price, the Display Book
will block the execution. In addition, when
executing blocks (10,000 shares or more or value of
$200,000 or more), trading out of a gap quote
situation or an LRP that locks or crossed the market,
the Display Book may adjust the execution price if
there is enough interest on the Display Book to
complete the transaction at a better price.
9 In
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8601
(‘‘Taking or Supplying Securities
Named in Order’’), 123A
(‘‘Miscellaneous Requirements’’) and
123B (‘‘Exchange Automated Order
Routing Systems’’) to remove this
concept.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
delete the Supplementary Material.10 of
NYSE Rule 13 in its entirety to remove
language that provides a DMM must
accept any order given to him, unless he
obtains Floor Official approval to
decline an order. The Exchange further
seeks to remove the phrase ‘‘the DMM
via’’ 10 from Supplementary Material.40
of NYSE Rule 91 that governs a DMM
making a proprietary trade against an
order, but retain the procedural
provisions. In Supplementary Material
to Rule 123A, the Exchange proposes to
delete .10 (‘‘Limited orders-Market
orders’’) since it speaks to a member
giving an order to the DMM. The first
paragraph of .20 (‘‘Sending orders to
DMMs’’) in that rule is proposed for
deletion as it governs members and
member organizations transmitting
orders to DMMs. The Exchange further
proposes to amend .20 of NYSE Rule
123A to: (i) Delete the concept of orders
being sent to the DMMs; and (ii) change
the title to ‘‘Changes in Day Orders’’
which reflects the retained material.
Similarly, Supplementary Material .31
(‘‘Orders sent to representatives’’), .32
(‘‘Report not received’’), .33
(‘‘Addressed order or order handed to
DMM’’), .34 (‘‘Unaddressed order’’), .35
(‘‘Erroneous statement’’), .36 (‘‘Legibility
of orders’’), .37 (‘‘Identity of stock’’), .38
(‘‘Reports, written and oral’’) and .39
(‘‘Duplicate reports’’) of NYSE Rule
123A are proposed for deletion as they
speak to transmitting or giving orders to
DMMs, DMMs receiving orders, DMMs
giving reports on orders, and similar
provisions.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
delete NYSE Rule 123B(b)(2)(B) because
it speaks of orders received by the DMM
through the Designated Order
Turnaround System and to erroneous
reports sent by the DMM on executions.
These functions are no longer handled
in this manner. As previously
explained, order acceptance and reports
of executions are handled by Exchange
systems. The Exchange also proposes to
delete NYSE Rule 123B(d) because it
describes orders being sent to and
executed by the DMM.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
paragraph (2)(A) of Rule 123B(b) to have
it apply to all members if the member
10 See e-mail from Deanna G. W. Logan, Managing
Director, NYSE Regulation, Inc., to David Liu,
Assistant Director, Division of Trading and Markets,
Commission, dated February 13, 2009 (making
technical edits) (‘‘February 13th e-mail’’).
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
8602
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 25, 2009 / Notices
makes an erroneous report of the price
of a transaction, by substituting the
word ‘‘member’’ for the word ‘‘broker’’
in the rule. This will then include
situations in which a DMM makes an
erroneous report as to price on a
transaction.
NYSE Rule 92(d)(6) (‘‘Limitations on
Members’ Trading Because of
Customers’ Orders’’) is further proposed
for deletion as it restricts DMM
proprietary trading during the hours the
Exchange is closed. The restriction was
predicated on the former specialist
system where the specialist had
knowledge of customer orders in his or
her possession. The restriction is
obviated by the fact that the DMM no
longer ‘‘holds’’ customer orders.
Nevertheless, as members, DMMs will
continue to be subject to the rule’s
general prohibition. Similarly, the last
sentence of NYSE Rule 127(d)(3)
(‘‘Block Crosses Outside the Prevailing
NYSE Quotation’’) is proposed for
deletion because it also is predicated on
the DMM retaining stock for the DMM’s
own account at a price at which the
DMM ‘‘holds’’ unexecuted customer
orders.11
The Exchange believes that the
amendments proposed herein to remove
legacy rule language that is inconsistent
with the role of the DMM as approved
by the Commission in the New Market
Model filing are necessary to adequately
reflect the functions performed by the
DMM.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ‘‘Act’’),12 in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,13 in particular, in that it is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
the proposed rule changes are consistent
with these principles in that it amends
legacy rules to accurately reflect the role
performed by the Exchange’s market
maker thus removing impediments to
and perfecting the mechanism of a free
and open market.
11 See
February 13th e-mail, supra, note 10.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
12 15
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:09 Feb 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change: (1) Does not significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and
(3) by its terms, does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of
filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 14 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.15
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing.16 However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay and designate the proposed rule
change operative upon filing.
The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
proposed rule change seeks to remove
legacy language that is inconsistent with
the role performed by DMMs as
approved by the Commission in the
New Market Model filing.17
Furthermore, it seeks to clarify its rule
text in order to avoid any undue
confusion on the part of Exchange
14 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii) requires the self-regulatory
organization to give the Commission notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with
a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
NYSE has satisfied this requirement.
17 See supra note 6.
15 17
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
market participants as it relates to the
function performed by DMMs.
Therefore, the Commission designates
the proposal operative upon filing.18
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.19
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2009–13 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2009–13. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
18 For purposes only of waiving the operative
delay for this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 36 / Wednesday, February 25, 2009 / Notices
of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2009–13 and should be submitted on or
before March 18, 2009.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–3980 Filed 2–24–09; 8:45 am]
Exchange, and the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–59416; File No. SR–
NYSEALTR–2009–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE
Alternext US LLC Amending Certain
NYSE Alternext Equities Rules To
Reflect That Designated Market Makers
(‘‘DMMs’’) on the Exchange No Longer
Act as Agents for Orders Entered on
the Exchange
February 18, 2009.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on February
4, 2009, NYSE Alternext US LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Alternext’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
certain NYSE Alternext Equities rules to
reflect that Designated Market Makers
(‘‘DMMs’’) on the Exchange will no
longer act as agents for orders entered
on the Exchange.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at https://www.nyse.com, the
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:09 Feb 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
1. Purpose
Through this filing, the Exchange
proposes to amend certain NYSE
Alternext Equities rules to conform
them with amendments filed by the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. [sic]
LLC 4 to reflect that the Designated
Market Makers (‘‘DMMs’’) no longer
have agency responsibilities for orders
entered on the Display Book® (‘‘Display
Book’’).5
As described more fully in a related
rule filing,6 NYSE Euronext acquired
The Amex Membership Corporation
(‘‘AMC’’) pursuant to an Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated January 17, 2008
(the ‘‘Merger’’). In connection with the
Merger, the Exchange’s predecessor, the
American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’), a subsidiary of AMC, became
a subsidiary of NYSE Euronext called
NYSE Alternext US LLC, and continues
to operate as a national securities
exchange registered under Section 6 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’).7 The effective
date of the Merger was October 1, 2008.
In connection with the Merger, on
December 1, 2008, the Exchange
4 See SR–NYSE–2009–13 (to be filed on February
4, 2009).
5 The Display Book® system is an order
management and execution facility. The Display
Book system receives and displays orders to the
DMM, contains the Book, and provides a
mechanism to execute and report transactions and
publish results to the Consolidated Tape. The
Display Book system is connected to a number of
other Exchange systems for the purposes of
comparison, surveillance, and reporting
information to customers and other market data and
national market systems.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58673
(September 29, 2008), 73 FR 57707 (October 3,
2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–60 and SR–Amex 2008–62)
(approving the Merger).
715 U.S.C. 78f.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8603
relocated all equities trading conducted
on the Exchange legacy trading systems
and facilities located at 86 Trinity Place,
New York, New York, to trading systems
and facilities located at 11 Wall Street,
New York, New York (the ‘‘Equities
Relocation’’). The Exchange’s equity
trading systems and facilities at 11 Wall
Street (the ‘‘NYSE Alternext Trading
Systems’’) are operated by the NYSE on
behalf of the Exchange.8
As part of the Equities Relocation,
NYSE Alternext adopted NYSE Rules 1–
1004, subject to such changes as
necessary to apply the Rules to the
Exchange, as the NYSE Alternext
Equities Rules to govern trading on the
NYSE Alternext Trading Systems.9 The
NYSE Alternext Equities Rules, which
became operative on December 1, 2008,
are substantially identical to the current
NYSE Rules 1–1004 and the Exchange
continues to update the NYSE Alternext
Equities Rules as necessary to conform
with rule changes to corresponding
NYSE Rules filed by the NYSE.
Background
On June 12, 2008, the NYSE filed a set
of proposed rule changes designed to
transform its market structure and
reinforce the NYSE as the premier
venue for price discovery, liquidity,
competitive quotes and price
improvement.10 That and other filings 11
formed the core initiatives submitted by
the NYSE to reinforce its dynamic and
competitive marketplace.
As outlined in SR–NYSE–2008–46
(the ‘‘New Market Model filing’’), the
changes to the NYSE’s marketplace
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58705
(October 1, 2008), 73 FR 58995 (October 8, 2008)
(SR–Amex 2008–63) (approving the Equities
Relocation).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58705
(October 1, 2008), 73 FR 58995 (October 8, 2008)
(SR–Amex 2008–63) (approving the Equities
Relocation); Securities Exchange Act Release No.
58833 (October 22, 2008), 73 FR 64642 (October 30,
2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–106) and Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 58839 (October 23, 2008),
73 FR 64645 (October 30, 2008) (SR–NYSEALTR–
2008–03) (together, approving the Bonds
Relocation); Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59022 (November 26, 2008), 73 FR 73683
(December 3, 2008) (SR–NYSEALTR–2008–10)
(adopting amendments to NYSE Alternext Equities
Rules to track changes to corresponding NYSE
Rules); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59027
(November 28, 2008), 73 FR 73681 (December 3,
2008) (SR–NYSEALTR–2008–11) (adopting
amendments to Rule 62–NYSE Alternext Equities to
track changes to corresponding NYSE Rule 62).
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58184
(July 17, 2008), 73 FR 42853 (July 23, 2008) (SR–
NYSE–2008–46).
11 See for example, Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 58052 (June 27, 2008), 73 FR 38274
(July 3, 2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–45) (amending
NYSE Rule 98); see also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 58363 (August 14, 2008), 73 FR 49514
(August 21, 2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–52) (amending
the NYSE allocation policy).
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 25, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8600-8603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3980]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-59415; File No. SR-NYSE-2009-13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by New York Stock Exchange LLC
Amending Certain NYSE Rules To Reflect That Designated Market Makers on
the Exchange No Longer Act as Agents for Orders Entered on the Exchange
February 18, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on February 4, 2009, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend certain NYSE rules to reflect that
Designated Market Makers (``DMMs'') on the Exchange will no longer act
as agents for orders entered on the Exchange.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at https://
www.nyse.com, the Exchange, and the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
[[Page 8601]]
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Through this filing, the Exchange proposes to amend certain NYSE
rules to reflect that the Designated Market Makers (``DMMs'') no longer
have agency responsibilities for orders entered on the NYSE Display
Book[supreg] (``Display Book'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Display Book[supreg] system is an order management and
execution facility. The Display Book system receives and displays
orders to the DMM, contains the Book, and provides a mechanism to
execute and report transactions and publish results to the
Consolidated Tape. The Display Book system is connected to a number
of other Exchange systems for the purposes of comparison,
surveillance, and reporting information to customers and other
market data and national market systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that parallel changes are proposed to be made to
the rules of the NYSE Alternext Exchange (formerly the American Stock
Exchange).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See SR-NYSE Alternext-2009-09 (to be filed February 4,
2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
On June 12, 2008, the NYSE filed a set of proposed rule changes
designed to transform its market structure and reinforce the NYSE as
the premier venue for price discovery, liquidity, competitive quotes
and price improvement.\6\ That and other filings \7\ formed the core
initiatives submitted by the Exchange to reinforce its dynamic and
competitive marketplace.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58184 (July 17,
2008), 73 FR 42853 (July 23, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-46).
\7\ See for example, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58052
(June 27, 2008), 73 FR 38274 (July 3, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-45)
(amending NYSE Rule 98); see also Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 58363 (August 14, 2008), 73 FR 49514 (August 21, 2008) (SR-NYSE-
2008-52) (amending the NYSE allocation policy).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As outlined in SR-NYSE-2008-46 (the ``New Market Model filing''),
the changes to the Exchange's marketplace included the replacement of
Exchange specialists with DMMs. The function of the DMM is
substantially different from the manner in which specialists functioned
vis-[agrave]-vis the relationship between Exchange order givers and
representation of these orders in the marketplace. DMMs no longer
receive copies of orders entered in Exchange systems prior to the
orders publication to all market participants by Display Book.
Similarly, DMMs do not have a negative obligation which would require
the DMM to yield trading for the DMM unit's proprietary account in
order to allow public orders to be executed against each other. DMMs
therefore trade on parity with all market participants.
Incoming orders to buy and sell submitted to the Exchange are
eligible for automatic quoting and immediate and automatic execution.
Instead of the DMM, the NYSE Display Book is responsible for tracking
the liquidity available at each specified price point. NYSE systems
automatically review the liquidity available on the Display Book for
execution and then using sophisticated execution logic access the
necessary liquidity to consummate trades. Exchange systems report
executions to the entering parties, update the quote and process order
cancellations.
Although the DMM no longer receives order by order information, he
or she is still responsible for the execution of manual transactions on
the Exchange including opening and re-opening transactions, closing
transactions, block transactions, gap quote situations and when trading
reaches LRPs that would lock or cross the market.\8\ DMMs are
responsible for choosing the price \9\ and the executions of the orders
at that price during those specific situations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See NYSE Rule 104(a)(2)-(5).
\9\ In an opening and reopening trade, Display Book will verify
that all interest that must be executed in the opening or reopening
can be executed at the price chosen by the DMM. If all the interest
that must be executed in the transaction cannot be executed at that
price, the Display Book will block the execution. In addition, when
executing blocks (10,000 shares or more or value of $200,000 or
more), trading out of a gap quote situation or an LRP that locks or
crossed the market, the Display Book may adjust the execution price
if there is enough interest on the Display Book to complete the
transaction at a better price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the current NYSE trading environment, the DMM no longer
functions as an agent for orders on the Display Book because the DMM
does not control order by order information. As such the Exchange
proposes through this filing to amend legacy rules that retain the
concept of the Exchange market maker as agent.
Proposed Rule Changes
Certain Exchange rules contain language that refers to the DMM
``holding,'' ``receiving,'' and/or ``accepting'' orders. These concepts
were consistent with the role performed by former specialist but are
inconsistent with the role of the DMM. The Exchange therefore proposes
to amend NYSE Rules 13 (``Definitions of Orders''), 91 (``Taking or
Supplying Securities Named in Order''), 123A (``Miscellaneous
Requirements'') and 123B (``Exchange Automated Order Routing Systems'')
to remove this concept.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to delete the Supplementary
Material.10 of NYSE Rule 13 in its entirety to remove language that
provides a DMM must accept any order given to him, unless he obtains
Floor Official approval to decline an order. The Exchange further seeks
to remove the phrase ``the DMM via'' \10\ from Supplementary
Material.40 of NYSE Rule 91 that governs a DMM making a proprietary
trade against an order, but retain the procedural provisions. In
Supplementary Material to Rule 123A, the Exchange proposes to delete
.10 (``Limited orders-Market orders'') since it speaks to a member
giving an order to the DMM. The first paragraph of .20 (``Sending
orders to DMMs'') in that rule is proposed for deletion as it governs
members and member organizations transmitting orders to DMMs. The
Exchange further proposes to amend .20 of NYSE Rule 123A to: (i) Delete
the concept of orders being sent to the DMMs; and (ii) change the title
to ``Changes in Day Orders'' which reflects the retained material.
Similarly, Supplementary Material .31 (``Orders sent to
representatives''), .32 (``Report not received''), .33 (``Addressed
order or order handed to DMM''), .34 (``Unaddressed order''), .35
(``Erroneous statement''), .36 (``Legibility of orders''), .37
(``Identity of stock''), .38 (``Reports, written and oral'') and .39
(``Duplicate reports'') of NYSE Rule 123A are proposed for deletion as
they speak to transmitting or giving orders to DMMs, DMMs receiving
orders, DMMs giving reports on orders, and similar provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See e-mail from Deanna G. W. Logan, Managing Director, NYSE
Regulation, Inc., to David Liu, Assistant Director, Division of
Trading and Markets, Commission, dated February 13, 2009 (making
technical edits) (``February 13th e-mail'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange proposes to delete NYSE Rule
123B(b)(2)(B) because it speaks of orders received by the DMM through
the Designated Order Turnaround System and to erroneous reports sent by
the DMM on executions. These functions are no longer handled in this
manner. As previously explained, order acceptance and reports of
executions are handled by Exchange systems. The Exchange also proposes
to delete NYSE Rule 123B(d) because it describes orders being sent to
and executed by the DMM.
The Exchange also proposes to amend paragraph (2)(A) of Rule
123B(b) to have it apply to all members if the member
[[Page 8602]]
makes an erroneous report of the price of a transaction, by
substituting the word ``member'' for the word ``broker'' in the rule.
This will then include situations in which a DMM makes an erroneous
report as to price on a transaction.
NYSE Rule 92(d)(6) (``Limitations on Members' Trading Because of
Customers' Orders'') is further proposed for deletion as it restricts
DMM proprietary trading during the hours the Exchange is closed. The
restriction was predicated on the former specialist system where the
specialist had knowledge of customer orders in his or her possession.
The restriction is obviated by the fact that the DMM no longer
``holds'' customer orders. Nevertheless, as members, DMMs will continue
to be subject to the rule's general prohibition. Similarly, the last
sentence of NYSE Rule 127(d)(3) (``Block Crosses Outside the Prevailing
NYSE Quotation'') is proposed for deletion because it also is
predicated on the DMM retaining stock for the DMM's own account at a
price at which the DMM ``holds'' unexecuted customer orders.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See February 13th e-mail, supra, note 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the amendments proposed herein to remove
legacy rule language that is inconsistent with the role of the DMM as
approved by the Commission in the New Market Model filing are necessary
to adequately reflect the functions performed by the DMM.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\12\ in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\
in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes the proposed rule changes are consistent with these principles
in that it amends legacy rules to accurately reflect the role performed
by the Exchange's market maker thus removing impediments to and
perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.\16\ However,
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange requested that the Commission waive
the 30-day operative delay and designate the proposed rule change
operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the self-regulatory organization to give the
Commission notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. NYSE has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
The proposed rule change seeks to remove legacy language that is
inconsistent with the role performed by DMMs as approved by the
Commission in the New Market Model filing.\17\ Furthermore, it seeks to
clarify its rule text in order to avoid any undue confusion on the part
of Exchange market participants as it relates to the function performed
by DMMs. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative
upon filing.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See supra note 6.
\18\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay for this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2009-13 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2009-13. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
[[Page 8603]]
of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2009-13 and should be submitted on or before March
18, 2009.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E9-3980 Filed 2-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P