Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements: Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review, 7737-7738 [E9-3470]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
Intended Use: ‘‘small 12 passenger
tour/sightseeing boat.’’
Geographic Region: ‘‘State of Hawaii.’’
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
Dated: February 10, 2009.
By order of the Maritime Administrator.
Leonard Sutter,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–3477 Filed 2–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0037]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements: Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections. This document describes
one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Refer to the docket notice
number cited at the beginning of this
notice and send your comments by any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202–493–2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charlene Doyle, Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative, Office of
Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., NVS–431, Washington, DC 20590.
Ms. Doyle’s phone number is 202–366–
1276 and her e-mail address is
charlene.doyle@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following: (i)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (iii) How to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv)
How to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses. In
compliance with these requirements,
NHTSA asks public comment on the
following proposed collection of
information:
Title: An In-Depth Examination of
Pedestrian-Involved Hit-and-Run
Crashes
Type of Request: New information
collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Number: This collection of
information uses no standard forms.
Abstract: The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
was established to reduce the mounting
number of deaths, injuries and
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7737
economic losses resulting from motor
vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs. Between
1994 and 2006, nearly 66,000 pedestrian
deaths were identified within the
United States, 12,000 of those by hitand-run crashes. Furthermore, the
number of pedestrians injured was as
high as 61,000 for the year 2006. The
annual number of pedestrian deaths has
decreased in the aforementioned period,
but the number of hit-and-run deaths
has remained roughly steady. Thus, the
proportion of hit-and-run-related deaths
every year has increased. Hit-and-run
crashes can be very difficult to identify
in existing data sources, and they are
also likely to be underreported
whenever there are no serious injuries.
Even a modest reduction in such
crashes would result in improved safety
for pedestrians, as well as a reduction in
the costs to society and the victims of
these crashes. Little previous
information or research characterizes
hit-and-run crashes, particularly
research that provides a set of
recommendations and tools to reduce
the magnitude of the problem. Most of
the background literature centers on
describing magnitude, temporal
occurrence, and some gender and age
trends of people involved in hit-and-run
crashes. However, information about the
physical environment, driver
motivations, and countermeasures has
not been extensively discussed in the
literature.
Solnick and Hemenway (1995)
conducted one of the most
comprehensive studies on hit and run
crashes. The authors noted that most
hit-and-run crashes occurred during the
weekend nights. Similarly, they
determined that the likelihood of a
senior driver leaving the scene is about
half of that of a young driver. Likewise,
this study found that male drivers tend
to be more likely to run than their
female counterparts—there were eight
male hit-and-run drivers for every five
female hit-and-run drivers. Although
hit-and-run crashes are a significant
component of crashes and crash-related
pedestrian injuries and fatalities, the
available research on these crashes is
limited.
NHTSA is committed to developing
effective programs that can reduce the
incidence of pedestrian hit-and-run
crashes. The best way to do this is to
conduct an in-depth analysis of
pedestrian-involved hit-and-run crashes
to identify the characteristics,
magnitude, and impacts on traffic
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
7738
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
safety. This study identifies the top 15
locations with high pedestrian-related
hit-and-run fatalities. Then with a
subset of these locations, an in-depth
analysis will be conducted which will
include a telephone survey of 900
drivers involved in a pedestrian
collision where there are no current
pending legal proceedings. Principal
subgroups for analysis will be drivers
who remained at the scene of the crash
and those who fled, but were later
identified. Participation by respondents
would be voluntary. The sample would
be drawn from court records in ten
jurisdictions; the ten jurisdictions to be
selected based upon an analysis of
national crash data. NHTSA’s
information needs require a sampling
approach that will identify drivers in
hit-and-run crashes in the United States
to allow a preliminary description of the
differences between drivers who run
and those who do not.
The questionnaire focuses on the
circumstances leading up to the crash,
the condition of the driver before and
after the crash, the extent of any
pedestrian injuries that resulted from
the crash, and the response to the crash
of the driver, the driver’s passengers or
bystanders. Standard demographics are
asked at the beginning of the interview.
In conducting the proposed survey, the
interviewers would use computer
assisted telephone interviewing to
reduce interview length and minimize
recording errors. The proposed survey
would be anonymous and confidential.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information): Under this
proposed effort, the Contractor would
conduct 900 telephone interviews
averaging approximately 30 minutes
each. We expect to need to contact 9000
drivers to obtain this number of
responses. The respondent sample
would be selected from among drivers
identified from police and court records
as having been convicted of an offense
resulting from a pedestrian-involved
crash in jurisdictions having high
numbers of such crashes. Using publicly
available data sources drivers would be
matched with telephone numbers. Each
member of the sample would complete
one interview.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of
Information: NHTSA estimates a 10%
response rate, due to the sensitivity of
the survey subject matter. In order to
achieve a sample size of 900, a total of
9,000 individuals must be contacted and
screened. The 8,100 individuals who are
contacted, but who refuse or are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
otherwise ineligible for the survey,
would require an average of 3 minutes
to complete the screener questionnaire
for a total of 405 hours. Each respondent
in the final survey sample of 900 drivers
would require an average of 30 minutes
to complete the telephone interview or
a total of 450 hours. Thus, the number
of estimated reporting burden hours a
year on the general public would be 855
for the proposed survey (405 for the
incomplete surveys, and 450 for the full
survey administration). The respondents
would not incur any reporting cost from
the information collection. The
respondents also would not incur any
recordkeeping burden or recordkeeping
cost from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
James F. Simons,
Director, Office of Regulatory Analysis and
Evaluation.
[FR Doc. E9–3470 Filed 2–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2009–0005; Notice 1]
Michelin North America, Inc., Receipt
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Michelin North America, Inc.
(Michelin), has determined that certain
passenger car tires manufactured
between September 18, 2008 and
October 10, 2008 did not fully comply
with paragraphs S5.5(e) and S5.5(f) of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS) No. 139 New Pneumatic
Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. Michelin
has filed an appropriate report pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), Michelin has petitioned
for an exemption from the notification
and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Michelin’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
Affected are approximately 2,240 size
P195/60R15 (87T) Michelin Harmony
brand passenger car tires manufactured
between September 18, 2008 and
October 10, 2008 at Michelin’s plant
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
located in Pictou, Canada.
Approximately 1,590 of these tires have
been delivered to Michelin’s customers.
The remaining tires (approximately 650)
are being held in Michelin’s possession
until they can be correctly relabeled.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore,
these provisions only apply to the tires
that have already passed from the
manufacturer to an owner, purchaser, or
dealer.
Paragraphs S5.5(e) and S5.5(f) of
FMVSS No. 139 require in pertinent
part:
S5.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in
paragraphs (a) through (i) of S5.5, each tire
must be marked on each sidewall with the
information specified in S5.5(a) through (d)
and on one sidewall with the information
specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this
standard. The markings must be placed
between the maximum section width and the
bead on at least one sidewall, unless the
maximum section width of the tire is located
in an area that is not more than one-fourth
of the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire. If the maximum section width
falls within that area, those markings must
appear between the bead and a point one-half
the distance from the bead to the shoulder of
the tire, on at least one sidewall. The
markings must be in letters and numerals not
less than 0.078 inches high and raised above
or sunk below the tire surface not less than
0.015 inches * * *
(e) The generic name of each cord material
used in the plies (both sidewall and tread
area) of the tire;
(f) The actual number of plies in the
sidewall, and the actual number of plies in
the tread area, if different * * *
Michelin explains that the
noncompliance is that, due to a mold
labeling error, the sidewall marking on
the reference side of the tires incorrectly
describes the number of plies in the
tread area of the tires. Specifically, the
tires in question were inadvertently
manufactured with ‘‘Tread Plies: 2
Polyester + 2 polyamide + 2 steel;
Sidewall plies: 2 polyester’’ marked on
the intended outboard sidewall. The
labeling should have been ‘‘Tread Plies:
2 Polyester + 1 polyamide + 2 steel;
Sidewall plies: 2 polyester.’’ Michelin
also explains that the marking on the
other sidewall of the tires correctly
describes the plies in the tread area of
the tires.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 32 (Thursday, February 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7737-7738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3470]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0037]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements: Agency
Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections. This
document describes one collection of information for which NHTSA
intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Refer to the docket notice number cited at the beginning of
this notice and send your comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charlene Doyle, Contracting Officer's
Technical Representative, Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., NVS-431, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Doyle's phone number is 202-
366-1276 and her e-mail address is charlene.doyle@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following: (i)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information will have practical utility; (ii) The accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) How to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including the
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses. In
compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on the
following proposed collection of information:
Title: An In-Depth Examination of Pedestrian-Involved Hit-and-Run
Crashes
Type of Request: New information collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Number: This collection of information uses no standard forms.
Abstract: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) was established to reduce the mounting number of deaths,
injuries and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle crashes on
the Nation's highways. As part of this statutory mandate, NHTSA is
authorized to conduct research as a foundation for the development of
motor vehicle standards and traffic safety programs. Between 1994 and
2006, nearly 66,000 pedestrian deaths were identified within the United
States, 12,000 of those by hit-and-run crashes. Furthermore, the number
of pedestrians injured was as high as 61,000 for the year 2006. The
annual number of pedestrian deaths has decreased in the aforementioned
period, but the number of hit-and-run deaths has remained roughly
steady. Thus, the proportion of hit-and-run-related deaths every year
has increased. Hit-and-run crashes can be very difficult to identify in
existing data sources, and they are also likely to be underreported
whenever there are no serious injuries. Even a modest reduction in such
crashes would result in improved safety for pedestrians, as well as a
reduction in the costs to society and the victims of these crashes.
Little previous information or research characterizes hit-and-run
crashes, particularly research that provides a set of recommendations
and tools to reduce the magnitude of the problem. Most of the
background literature centers on describing magnitude, temporal
occurrence, and some gender and age trends of people involved in hit-
and-run crashes. However, information about the physical environment,
driver motivations, and countermeasures has not been extensively
discussed in the literature.
Solnick and Hemenway (1995) conducted one of the most comprehensive
studies on hit and run crashes. The authors noted that most hit-and-run
crashes occurred during the weekend nights. Similarly, they determined
that the likelihood of a senior driver leaving the scene is about half
of that of a young driver. Likewise, this study found that male drivers
tend to be more likely to run than their female counterparts--there
were eight male hit-and-run drivers for every five female hit-and-run
drivers. Although hit-and-run crashes are a significant component of
crashes and crash-related pedestrian injuries and fatalities, the
available research on these crashes is limited.
NHTSA is committed to developing effective programs that can reduce
the incidence of pedestrian hit-and-run crashes. The best way to do
this is to conduct an in-depth analysis of pedestrian-involved hit-and-
run crashes to identify the characteristics, magnitude, and impacts on
traffic
[[Page 7738]]
safety. This study identifies the top 15 locations with high
pedestrian-related hit-and-run fatalities. Then with a subset of these
locations, an in-depth analysis will be conducted which will include a
telephone survey of 900 drivers involved in a pedestrian collision
where there are no current pending legal proceedings. Principal
subgroups for analysis will be drivers who remained at the scene of the
crash and those who fled, but were later identified. Participation by
respondents would be voluntary. The sample would be drawn from court
records in ten jurisdictions; the ten jurisdictions to be selected
based upon an analysis of national crash data. NHTSA's information
needs require a sampling approach that will identify drivers in hit-
and-run crashes in the United States to allow a preliminary description
of the differences between drivers who run and those who do not.
The questionnaire focuses on the circumstances leading up to the
crash, the condition of the driver before and after the crash, the
extent of any pedestrian injuries that resulted from the crash, and the
response to the crash of the driver, the driver's passengers or
bystanders. Standard demographics are asked at the beginning of the
interview. In conducting the proposed survey, the interviewers would
use computer assisted telephone interviewing to reduce interview length
and minimize recording errors. The proposed survey would be anonymous
and confidential.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information):
Under this proposed effort, the Contractor would conduct 900 telephone
interviews averaging approximately 30 minutes each. We expect to need
to contact 9000 drivers to obtain this number of responses. The
respondent sample would be selected from among drivers identified from
police and court records as having been convicted of an offense
resulting from a pedestrian-involved crash in jurisdictions having high
numbers of such crashes. Using publicly available data sources drivers
would be matched with telephone numbers. Each member of the sample
would complete one interview.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of Information: NHTSA estimates a 10%
response rate, due to the sensitivity of the survey subject matter. In
order to achieve a sample size of 900, a total of 9,000 individuals
must be contacted and screened. The 8,100 individuals who are
contacted, but who refuse or are otherwise ineligible for the survey,
would require an average of 3 minutes to complete the screener
questionnaire for a total of 405 hours. Each respondent in the final
survey sample of 900 drivers would require an average of 30 minutes to
complete the telephone interview or a total of 450 hours. Thus, the
number of estimated reporting burden hours a year on the general public
would be 855 for the proposed survey (405 for the incomplete surveys,
and 450 for the full survey administration). The respondents would not
incur any reporting cost from the information collection. The
respondents also would not incur any recordkeeping burden or
recordkeeping cost from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
James F. Simons,
Director, Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. E9-3470 Filed 2-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P