Implementation of Interstate Arrangement for Combining Employment and Wages; New Definition of Paying State for Combined-Wage Claims, 5682-5686 [E9-2000]
Download as PDF
5682
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 19 / Friday, January 30, 2009 / Notices
Required activity
ETA form No.
Number of
respondents
Submissions
per year
Total annual
submissions
Hours per
submission
Total burden
hours
Job Corps Health Staff Activity ................
6–125
112
1
112
Job Corps Health Annual Service Costs
Immunization Record ...............................
6–128
6–112
112
71,000
1
1
112
71,000
CM Health Record Envelope ...................
6–135
71,000
1
71,000
CM Health Record Folder ........................
Inspection of Residential & Educational
Facilities ................................................
Inspection of Waste Treatment Facilities
Costs ....................................................
6–136
71,000
1
71,000
0.25
(25 min)
0.25
0.05
(5 min)
0.125
(13 min)
0.125
6–37
122
4
488
0.5
41
6–39
23
4
92
130
Inspection Water Supply Facilities ...........
6–38
122
4
488
1.25
(1 hr. 25 min)
1.25
693
Total ..................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
36,648
Total annual
submissions
Hours per
submission
A total of 7,578 burden hours are
estimated for the preparation of the
Center Operating Plans listed below that
51
51
5,917
15,383
15,383
are required for the operation of a Job
Corps center.
Number of
respondents
Submissions
per year
Total burden
hours
ETA form No.
Center Operation Plan .............................
Maintenance .............................................
C/M Welfare .............................................
Annual VST ..............................................
Annual Staff Training ...............................
Energy Conservation ...............................
Outreach ..................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
90
122
122
122
122
122
122
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
90
122
122
122
122
122
122
30
5
2
24
1
5
2
2820
610
244
2928
122
610
244
Total ..................................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Required activity
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
7,578
Total Estimated Burden: 62,525
hours.
Total Burden Cost (Capital/Startup):
The Office of Job Corps has automated
the data collection process for its
centers. The Center Information System
allows all centers to directly input data
into a national database. The
maintenance cost associated with the
system is estimated to be $2.7 million a
year for hardware and software.
Total Burden Cost (Operating/
Maintaining): The costs to contractors
for accomplishing record keeping
requirements are computed by the
Federal Government annually. While
precise costs cannot be identified, at the
present time and based on past
experience, the annual related costs for
contractor staff are estimated to be
$968,834, which represents an average
cost of $15.12 per hour.
Comments submitted in response to
this comment request will be
summarized and/or included in the
request for Office of Management and
Budget approval of the information
collection request; they will also
become a matter of public record.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Jan 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
Dated: January 13, 2009.
Esther R. Johnson,
Administrator, Office of Job Corps.
[FR Doc. E9–2025 Filed 1–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Implementation of Interstate
Arrangement for Combining
Employment and Wages; New
Definition of Paying State for
Combined-Wage Claims
AGENCY: Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Employment and
Training Administration (ETA) of the
United States Department of Labor (the
Department) is publishing, for public
information, notice of the issuance and
availability of the Unemployment
Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) that
provides guidance to the states
regarding the implementation of the
new definition of ‘‘paying state’’ for an
unemployment compensation (UC)
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
combined-wage claim (CWC) filed
under the Interstate Arrangement for
Combining Employment and Wages, as
amended at 73 Federal Register (FR)
63038 (October 23, 2008).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie C. Garcia, 202–693–3207.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CWC
program allows an unemployed
individual with employment and wages
in more than one state to combine his/
her wages to establish a CWC under the
law of a single state called the ‘‘paying
state’’ to qualify for benefits or to
receive additional benefits (i.e., a higher
weekly benefit amount). On October 23,
2008, the U.S. Department of Labor
published a final rule in the Federal
Register changing the definition of
‘‘paying state.’’ Effective January 6,
2009, the definition of ‘‘paying state’’ at
20 CFR 616.6(e) is amended to mean a
single state against which the claimant
files a CWC, if (1) the claimant has
employment and wages in that state’s
base period, and (2) the claimant
qualifies for unemployment
compensation in that state using the
combined employment and wages.
On November 14, 2008, UIPL No. 1–
09 was issued. The complete text of the
guidance documents are provided in
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 19 / Friday, January 30, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
this notice. In addition, the guidance
documents are available on the ETA
Advisory Web site: UIPL No. 1–09 -at
https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/
corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2681.
Unemployment Insurance Program
Letter No. 1–09
To: State Workforce Agencies.
From: Brent R. Orrell, Deputy
Assistant Secretary.
Subject: Interstate Arrangement for
Combining Employment and Wages;
New Definition of Paying State for
Combined-Wage Claims.
1. Purpose. To provide guidance to
states regarding the change in the
definition of ‘‘paying state’’ for an
unemployment compensation (UC)
combined-wage claim (CWC) filed
under the Interstate Arrangement for
Combining Employment and Wages.
2. References. Section 3304(a)(9)(B) of
the Federal Unemployment Tax Act
(FUTA), 20 CFR Part 616; ET Handbook
No. 399; ET Handbook No. 392; 20 CFR
Part 616, as amended at 73 Federal
Register (FR) 63068 (October 23, 2008).
3. Summary. The CWC program
allows an unemployed individual with
employment and wages in more than
one state to combine his/her wages to
establish a CWC under the law of a
single state called the ‘‘paying state’’ to
qualify for benefits or to receive
additional benefits (i.e., a higher weekly
benefit amount). On October 23, 2008,
the U.S. Department of Labor published
a final rule in the Federal Register
changing the definition of ‘‘paying
state.’’ Effective January 6, 2009, the
definition of ‘‘paying state’’ at 20 CFR
616.6(e) is amended to mean a single
state against which the claimant files a
CWC, if (1) the claimant has
employment and wages in that state’s
base period, and (2) the claimant
qualifies for UC in that state using the
combined employment and wages. (73
FR 63068 (Oct. 23, 2008)).
All 50 states, plus the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands are
required to participate in the Interstate
Arrangement for Combining
Employment and Wages and will be
affected by this change. The attached set
of questions and answers provide
guidance to states about the new
definition of paying state and the states’
responsibilities for providing CWC
filing options.
4. Action. Administrators are
requested to provide this information to
appropriate staff.
5. Inquiries. States should direct
questions to the appropriate Regional
Office.
6. Attachments.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Jan 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
Attachment #1: Combined-Wage
Claims—Questions and Answers on the
New Definition of Paying State.
Attachment #2: States’
Responsibilities for Providing
Combined-Wage Claim (CWC) Filing
Options Effective January 6, 2009.
Attachment #3: Sample Scripts for
Providing Combined-Wage Claim (CWC)
Filing Options.
Attachment 1 to UIPL No. 1–09
Combined-Wage Claims; Questions and
Answers on the New Definition of
Paying State
A. New Definition of Paying State
1. Question: How does the new
definition of paying state change the
way an individual files a CWC?
Answer: Prior to the new amendment,
which becomes effective on January 6,
2009, the paying state is the state in
which the individual files the CWC
(usually the state where the individual
is physically located at the time of filing
a CWC), if s/he qualifies for benefits
under the UC law of that state on the
basis of combined employment and
wages. The current definition also
identifies the paying state when the
individual does not qualify for
unemployment benefits under the UC
law of the state in which s/he files the
CWC or when the individual applies for
a CWC from Canada.
Effective January 6, 2009, the new
definition of paying state for a CWC is
the state against which the individual
elects to file a CWC, provided the
individual has employment and wages
in that state’s base period(s), and the
individual qualifies for UC under the
law of that state using combined
employment and wages. (See revised 20
CFR 616.6(e).)
2. Question: What is the earliest
possible effective date of an initial CWC
based on the new rule?
Answer: The earliest possible effective
date of an initial CWC based on the new
rule is Tuesday, January 6, 2009, in
states where the effective date of an
initial claim may begin on a Tuesday. In
most states, where weeks of
unemployment begin on Sunday, the
earliest effective date of a CWC is
Sunday, January 11, 2009. This means
that individuals filing a CWC in these
states during the week beginning
Sunday, January 4, 2009, will be subject
to the regulations prior to the
amendment. Individuals filing a CWC
during the week beginning Sunday,
January 11, 2009, and thereafter, will be
subject to the amended rule that is
effective January 6, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5683
B. States’ Responsibilities Regarding the
New Definition of Paying State
1. Question: When an individual
contacts a state about filing a CWC,
what are the state’s responsibilities in
advising the individual of his/her
options?
Answer: The responsibility of the state
varies depending on the circumstances
of the individual.
If the individual has employment and
wages in the state, the state must advise
the individual of the state’s qualifying
requirements and his/her potential
eligibility for benefits (if any) under its
law. The individual must also be told
that s/he has the option to file in any
other state(s) where s/he has
employment and wages. The state must
advise the individual that there are
differences in weekly benefit amounts
and other qualifying requirements (i.e.,
state laws vary). If the individual wishes
to explore options with any other
state(s), the state must provide
information about how to contact any
such state(s).
If the individual has no employment
and wages in the state, the state must
provide general information about the
CWC program and information about
how to contact the state(s) where the
individual has employment and wages.
(See Attachment 2.)
2. Question: Does the new definition
of paying state require states to follow
any specific order in determining which
state is the paying state for a CWC
claim?
Answer: No. Individuals may
establish a CWC in any state in which
they have employment and wages in the
base period(s) of the state and qualify
based on combining their wages. This
includes individuals residing in Canada
who have performed work in the United
States.
3. Question: How will individuals
determine the appropriate state to file a
CWC?
Answer: The individual is responsible
for deciding the state against which to
file a CWC. States receiving inquiries
from individuals potentially eligible to
apply for CWCs must assist such
individuals by providing general
information about the CWC program
advising that states’ programs/
entitlements vary and contact
information for the state(s) where the
individual worked.
States may refer individuals to
America’s Service Locator, which is
located at: https://
www.servicelocator.org/OWSLinks.asp
and/or to specific states’ Web sites.
4. Question: How does the state
inform the individual of other filing
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
5684
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 19 / Friday, January 30, 2009 / Notices
options when a state determines that an
individual is monetarily ineligible for a
CWC after all wage transfers are
complete?
Answer: Under the new rule, a state’s
written determination of monetary
ineligibility under a CWC must contain
information indicating that the
individual may file a CWC claim in
another state where the individual has
employment and wages during the
state’s base period(s). (See revised 20
CFR 616.7(f).) States will meet this
requirement by including a statement
such as the following:
You may be eligible for benefits on the
basis of combining your employment and
wages in another state where you have
worked. To file a claim, you will need to
contact the other state(s) where you worked.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
5. Question: Prior to the new
amendment, there were cases where the
paying state did not know if wages from
other states were available for transfer.
Does the new definition affect the way
states handle these cases?
Answer: The new amendment does
not change current procedures in this
regard. When a state is a potential
paying state, it should assist the
individual in filing a CWC when the
individual wishes to pursue a claim. As
in the past, there will be some instances
where individuals’ wages will not be
available for use on a CWC because of
administrative complications. States
will need to address these cases on an
individual basis. In some cases, a claim
may need to be withdrawn and a
backdated claim filed with another
state. States should follow existing
backdating policies and procedures.
6. Question: Does the new definition
affect the way Federal (civilian and/or
military) wages are assigned?
Answer: The rules about the
assignment of Federal wages have not
changed.
C. CWC Filing Options
1. Question: When an individual has
employment and wages in more than
one state, must the individual file a
CWC?
Answer: No, filing a CWC remains
voluntary on the part of the individual.
(Refer to 20 CFR 616.7(a) and (c).)
2. Question: Under the new definition
may an individual establish a CWC
under the law of the state where s/he
resides?
Answer: Yes, but only if the
individual has sufficient base period
wages to qualify for benefits in the state
of residence. An individual’s residence
is not relevant in determining the
paying state. (Refer to 20 CFR 616.6(e).)
3. Question: The individual is eligible
in State A for a regular intrastate claim
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Jan 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
using regular base period wages. State A
also has an alternative base period, but
it is available only if the individual is
monetarily ineligible under the state’s
regular base period. The individual
could also establish eligibility in State
B, where s/he has lag quarter wages,
which permits the use of the alternative
base period at the individual’s option.
What are this individual’s filing
options?
Answer: The individual has the
option to establish: (1) a regular
intrastate UC claim in State A, or (2) an
interstate CWC against State B.
4. Question: Under the new
definition, is an individual who has
elected to withdraw a CWC filed in
State A able to establish a CWC in State
B in which s/he also has employment
and wages?
Answer: Yes, provided the individual
is otherwise eligible, does not have an
active claim with available benefits in
State A, and has covered employment
and/or wages in State B. The fact that s/
he has withdrawn a prior CWC from
State A has no effect on whether s/he
may establish a CWC in State B (or any
other state in which s/he had
employment and wages).
5. Question: What impact does the
new rule have on the states’
responsibilities for providing claim
filing options to individuals potentially
eligible to file CWCs?
Answer: A state will have different
responsibilities with respect to an
individual potentially eligible for a
CWC depending on whether it is the
CWC ‘‘paying state,’’ ‘‘potential paying
state,’’ ‘‘agent state,’’ or ‘‘inquiry state’’
as defined below:
• A ‘‘paying state’’ is a single state
against which the individual files a
CWC, if the individual has employment
and wages in that state’s base period(s)
and the individual qualifies for UC
under that state’s law using combined
employment and wages.
• A ‘‘potential paying state’’ is a state
in which an individual might establish
a CWC.
• An ‘‘agent state’’ is the state that
takes the interstate CWC on behalf of the
paying state because the paying state
does not accept interstate claims,
including any interstate CWC, by
phone/Internet.
• An ‘‘inquiry state’’ is the state
contacted by an individual who is
potentially eligible for a CWC, but who
has no employment and wages in that
state.
There are generally three levels of
responsibility states will have with
respect to providing filing options; these
include inquiry filing options, detailed
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
filing options and other filing options.
(See Attachment 2.)
Attachment 2 to UIPL No. 01–09
States’ Responsibilities for Providing
Combined-Wage Claim (CWC) Filing
Options Effective January 6, 2009
Inquiry Filing Options:
• States without base period
employment and wages (an inquiry
state) for the individual must provide:
Æ General information about the CWC
program advising that states’ programs/
entitlements vary; and,
Æ Contact information for the state(s)
where the individual worked during the
base period(s) of such state(s).
• States with base period employment
and wages (a potential paying state) for
the individual must provide:
Æ General information about the CWC
program advising programs/entitlements
vary between states;
Æ Information about its eligibility
requirements and the individual’s
potential eligibility (including weekly
benefit amount, maximum benefit
amount) under its law for:
› A regular UI claim; and/or a CWC
(based on available information);
Æ if available, the maximum weekly
benefit amount(s) of the other state(s)
where the individual worked; and,
Æ contact information for the other
state(s) where the individual worked
during the base period(s) of such
state(s).
Detailed Filing Options:
• States with base period employment
and wages and any state(s) against
which the individual decides to file a
claim must provide:
Æ General information about the CWC
program advising programs/entitlements
vary between states;
Æ A review of the individual’s work
history to determine which filing
options are available; and,
Æ Information about its eligibility
requirements and the individual’s
potential eligibility (including weekly
benefit amount, maximum benefit
amount) under its law for:
› A regular UI claim; and/or a CWC.
If a state is an agent state taking the
claim on behalf of the paying state, the
agent state will provide detailed filing
options using available information at
the time the interstate CWC is filed/
taken.
Other Filing Options:
• If a CWC ‘‘paying state’’ issues a
determination that the claimant is
monetarily ineligible on a CWC after all
wages are transferred, it must provide
information to the claimant about his/
her right to establish a claim in another
state where s/he worked in its written
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 19 / Friday, January 30, 2009 / Notices
determination of ineligibility. Language
similar to the following will satisfy this
requirement:
Æ You may be eligible for benefits on
the basis of combining your employment
and wages in another state where you
have worked. To file a claim, you will
need to contact the other state(s) where
you worked.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Attachment 3 to UIPL 1–09
Sample Scripts for Providing CombinedWage Claim (CWC) Filing Options
Inquiry Filing Options:
• States without base period
employment and wages (an inquiry
state) for the individual must provide:
Æ General information about the CWC
program advising that states’ programs/
entitlements vary; and
Æ Contact information for the state(s)
where the individual worked during the
base period(s) of such state(s).
An example of information that must
be provided to an individual in a state
where the individual has no
employment or wages: ‘‘Mr. Jones,
because you have worked in three
states, you may be able to establish an
unemployment claim with any of those
states under the Combined-Wage Claim
program. Your wages will be combined
and the amount of your benefits will be
determined under the law of the state
where you file your combined-wage
claim. This might increase your benefit
amount. You should know that state
unemployment laws, weekly benefit
amounts, and eligibility requirements
vary between the states. I will provide
information to you about how you may
contact each of the states where you
have worked to obtain this type of state
information and their filing procedures.
Although you may be eligible to receive
unemployment benefits in more than
one of these states, you may only
establish a combined-wage claim against
one of these states.’’
• States with base period employment
and wages (a potential paying state)
must provide:
Æ General information about the CWC
program advising programs/entitlements
vary between states;
Æ Information about its eligibility
requirements and the individual’s
potential eligibility (including weekly
benefit amount, maximum benefit
amount) under its law for:
› A regular UI claim; and/or a CWC
(based on available information);
Æ If available, the maximum weekly
benefit amount(s) of the other state(s)
where the individual worked; and,
Æ Contact information for the other
state(s) where the individual worked
during the base period(s) of such
state(s).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Jan 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
An example of information that must
be provided to an individual in a state
where the individual has employment
and wages (a potential CWC paying
state): ‘‘Mr. Jones, because you have
worked in three states including this
one, you may be able to establish an
unemployment claim with any one of
these states under the Combined-Wage
Claim program. Your wages will be
combined and your monetary
entitlement will be determined under
the law of the one state where you file
your combined-wage claim. You should
know that state unemployment laws,
weekly benefit amounts, and eligibility
requirements vary between the states.
Can you tell me where you have worked
in this state? (Follow your state’s
procedures on verifying identity.) Thank
you. In what other states did you work?
Based on the wages reported by your
employer(s), you would qualify for a
weekly benefit amount of $l and a
maximum benefit amount of $l if you
establish a claim in this state using only
your wages earned here. If you establish
a combined-wage claim here using
wages earned in the other state(s), you
would potentially qualify for a weekly
benefit amount of $l and a maximum
benefit amount of $l. This amount is
only an estimate and will not become
final until all out-of-state wages are
received here. As I mentioned before,
state unemployment laws and benefit
amounts vary between the states.
Because of this, you may want to
contact the other states where you have
worked to find out your potential
eligibility there before making a
decision on which state to file in. Since
I have information available concerning
the maximum weekly benefit amounts
in the two other states in which you
worked I can provide it to you; the
weekly amounts are $l and $l. I will
provide information to you about how
you may contact each of the states
where you have worked to obtain
information about your potential
entitlement in these states and their
filing procedures. Although you may be
eligible to receive unemployment
benefits in more than one of these states,
you may only establish a combinedwage claim against one state. Do you
have any questions for me?’’
Detailed Filing Options:
• States with base period employment
and wages and any state(s) against
which the individual decides to file a
claim must provide:
Æ General information about the CWC
program advising programs/entitlements
vary between states;
Æ A review of the individual’s work
history to determine which filing
options are available; and,
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5685
Æ Information about its eligibility
requirements and the individual’s
potential eligibility (including weekly
benefit amount, maximum benefit
amount) under its law for:
› A regular UI claim; and/or a CWC.
If a state is acting as an agent state
taking the claim on behalf of the paying
state, the agent state will provide
detailed filing options using available
information at the time the interstate
CWC is filed/taken.
Scenario 1. An example of
information that must be provided to a
individual when a filing decision (i.e.,
the state where s/he will file the CWC)
has been made by the individual: ‘‘Mr.
Jones, because you have worked in three
states including this one, you may be
able to establish an unemployment
claim with any of these states under the
Combined-Wage Claim program. Your
wages will be combined and the amount
of your benefits will be determined
under the law of the state where you
establish your combined-wage claim.
You should know that state
unemployment laws, weekly benefit
amounts, and eligibility requirements
vary between the states. Can you tell me
where you have worked in this state?
(Follow your state’s procedures on
verifying identity.) Thank you. In what
other states did you work? Based on the
wages reported by your employer(s),
you would qualify for a weekly benefit
amount of $l and a maximum benefit
amount of $l if you establish a claim
using only your wages earned here. If
you establish a combined-wage claim
here using wages earned here and in the
two other state(s), you would potentially
qualify for a weekly benefit amount of
$l and a maximum benefit amount of
$l. This amount is only an estimate
and will not become final until all out
of state wages are received here. As I
mentioned before, state unemployment
laws and benefit amounts vary between
the states. Have you contacted the other
states in which you worked to find out
about your potential entitlement there?
(Claimant answers yes.) Good. Would
you like to establish a combined-wage
claim with this state, using the wages
you earned here and wages from the
other two states in which you worked?
(Claimant answers yes.) Great, I have a
few more questions for you.’’
Scenario 2. An example of
information that must be provided to an
individual when there is no employment
and wages in the state, the individual
has chosen to file an agent interstate
CWC claim, and the liable CWC state
does not accept phone or Internet
claims: ‘‘Mr. Jones, because you have
worked in three other states, you may be
able to establish an unemployment
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
5686
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 19 / Friday, January 30, 2009 / Notices
claim with any of these states under the
Combined-Wage Claim program. Your
wages will be combined and the amount
of your benefits will be determined
under the law of the one state where
you establish your combined-wage
claim. You should know that state
unemployment laws, weekly benefit
amounts, and eligibility requirements
vary between the states. Can you tell me
where you have worked, the dates of
such work and the states in which you
worked? (Follow your state’s procedures
on verifying identity.) Thank you. Based
on what you have provided to me, you
could establish a claim with any of
these states. Have you contacted any of
these states to obtain information about
potential eligibility? (Individual
answers yes.) And, do you know which
state you wish to establish a claim with?
(Claimant answers yes and indicates s/
he wants to file a claim with State A,
which does not accept interstate claims
by phone or Internet.) I will be happy
to take your claim against State A for
you. Please keep in mind that I am
acting as their agent in taking your
claim. You will receive detailed
information about the amount of
benefits for which you qualify and
continuing filing instructions from that
state. The exact amount of your
entitlement will not become final until
your claim is established and your
wages are transferred to the paying state.
I have a few more questions so let’s get
started.’’
Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of
January, 2009.
Douglas F. Small,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. E9–2000 Filed 1–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Committee on Equal Opportunities in
Science and Engineering (CEOSE);
Notice of Meeting
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Committee on Equal Opportunities
in Science and Engineering (1173).
Dates/Time: February 19, 2009, 8:30 a.m.–
5:30 p.m.; February 20, 2009, 8:30 a.m.–2
p.m.
Place: National Science Foundation (NSF),
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1235,
Arlington, VA 22230.
To help facilitate your access into the
building, please contact the individual listed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:54 Jan 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
below prior to the meeting so that a visitors
badge may be prepared for you in advance.
Type of Meeting: Open.
Contact Person: Dr. Margaret E.M. Tolbert,
Senior Advisor and CEOSE Executive
Liaison, Office of Integrative Activities,
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
Telephone Numbers: (703) 292–4216, (703)
292–8040, mtolbert@nsf.gov.
Minutes: Minutes may be obtained from
the Executive Liaison at the above address or
the Web site at https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/
activities/ceose/index.jsp.
Purpose of Meeting: To study NSF
programs and policies and provide advice
and recommendations concerning
broadening participation in science and
engineering.
Dates & Times: Monday, March 9, 2009;
7:45 a.m.–9 p.m.; Tuesday, March 10, 2009;
8 a.m.–3:30 p.m.
Place: Jackson State University, Jackson
MS.
Type of Meeting: Part-open.
Contact Person: Dr. William Brittain,
Program Director, Materials Research Science
and Engineering Centers Program, Division of
Materials Research, Room 1065, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292–
5039.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and
recommendations concerning further support
of the Partnership for Research and
Education in Materials (PREM) at Jackson
State University, Jackson MS.
Agenda:
Agenda
Monday, March 9, 2009
7:45 a.m.–9 a.m. Closed—Executive Session
9 a.m.–4 p.m. Open—Review of the Jackson
State PREM
4 p.m.–6 p.m. Closed—Executive Session
6 p.m.–9 p.m. Open—Poster Session and
Dinner
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Opening Statement by the CEOSE Chair
Presentations and Discussions:
✓ Communicating Science Broadly
✓ Discussion of Recommendations from
the October 29, 2008 Mini-Symposium on
Native Americans
✓ Conversation with the NSF Director
✓ Presentation on the Policy White paper
on Women of Color in STEM
✓ Roundtable Discussion by NSF
Assistant Directors and Office Directors:
Diversity Issues & Recent Broadening
Participation Activities
✓ Concurrent Meetings of CEOSE Ad Hoc
Subcommittees
✓ Reports of CEOSE Ad Hoc
Subcommittees, Including the Status of the
Preparation of the Biennial Report to
Congress and Comments by Federal Agency
Liaisons
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
8 a.m.–9 a.m. Closed—Executive Session
9 a.m.–10 a.m. Open—Review of the Brown
MRSEC
10 a.m.–3:30 p.m. Closed—Executive
Session, Draft and Review Report
Reason For Closing: The work being
reviewed may include information of a
proprietary or confidential nature, including
technical information; financial data, such as
salaries and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the proposals.
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552
b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the
Sunshine Act.
Friday, February 20, 2009
Opening Statement by the CEOSE Chair
Presentations and Discussions:
✓ A Science of Broadening Participation
✓ Discussion: The CEOSE Path Forward
✓ Reports by CEOSE Liaisons to Advisory
Committees of the National Science
Foundation
✓ Completion of Unfinished Business
Dated: January 27, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–1997 Filed 1–29–09; 8:45 am]
Dated: January 27, 2009.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–2046 Filed 1–29–09; 8:45 am]
Proposal Review Panel for Materials
Research; Notice of Meeting
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Proposal Review Panel for Materials
Research; Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463 as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Site Visit review of the Partnership
for Research and Education in Materials
(PREM) at Jackson State University, Jackson
MS (DMR) #1203.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463 as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Site Visit review of the Materials
Research Science and Engineering Center
(MRSEC) at California Institute of
Technology (Caltech), Pasadena, CA (DMR)
#1203.
Dates & Times: Thursday, February 26,
2009, 2008; 7:45 a.m.–9 p.m., Friday,
February 27, 2009; 8 a.m.–4:30 p.m.
Place: Caltech, Pasadena, CA.
Type of Meeting: Part-open.
Contact Person: Dr. Rama Bansil, Program
Director, Materials Research Science and
Engineering Centers Program, Division of
Materials Research, Room 1065, National
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 19 (Friday, January 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5682-5686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-2000]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Implementation of Interstate Arrangement for Combining
Employment and Wages; New Definition of Paying State for Combined-Wage
Claims
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) of the United
States Department of Labor (the Department) is publishing, for public
information, notice of the issuance and availability of the
Unemployment Insurance Program Letter (UIPL) that provides guidance to
the states regarding the implementation of the new definition of
``paying state'' for an unemployment compensation (UC) combined-wage
claim (CWC) filed under the Interstate Arrangement for Combining
Employment and Wages, as amended at 73 Federal Register (FR) 63038
(October 23, 2008).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie C. Garcia, 202-693-3207.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CWC program allows an unemployed
individual with employment and wages in more than one state to combine
his/her wages to establish a CWC under the law of a single state called
the ``paying state'' to qualify for benefits or to receive additional
benefits (i.e., a higher weekly benefit amount). On October 23, 2008,
the U.S. Department of Labor published a final rule in the Federal
Register changing the definition of ``paying state.'' Effective January
6, 2009, the definition of ``paying state'' at 20 CFR 616.6(e) is
amended to mean a single state against which the claimant files a CWC,
if (1) the claimant has employment and wages in that state's base
period, and (2) the claimant qualifies for unemployment compensation in
that state using the combined employment and wages.
On November 14, 2008, UIPL No. 1-09 was issued. The complete text
of the guidance documents are provided in
[[Page 5683]]
this notice. In addition, the guidance documents are available on the
ETA Advisory Web site: UIPL No. 1-09 -at https://wdr.doleta.gov/
directives/corr_doc.cfm?DOCN=2681.
Unemployment Insurance Program Letter No. 1-09
To: State Workforce Agencies.
From: Brent R. Orrell, Deputy Assistant Secretary.
Subject: Interstate Arrangement for Combining Employment and Wages;
New Definition of Paying State for Combined-Wage Claims.
1. Purpose. To provide guidance to states regarding the change in
the definition of ``paying state'' for an unemployment compensation
(UC) combined-wage claim (CWC) filed under the Interstate Arrangement
for Combining Employment and Wages.
2. References. Section 3304(a)(9)(B) of the Federal Unemployment
Tax Act (FUTA), 20 CFR Part 616; ET Handbook No. 399; ET Handbook No.
392; 20 CFR Part 616, as amended at 73 Federal Register (FR) 63068
(October 23, 2008).
3. Summary. The CWC program allows an unemployed individual with
employment and wages in more than one state to combine his/her wages to
establish a CWC under the law of a single state called the ``paying
state'' to qualify for benefits or to receive additional benefits
(i.e., a higher weekly benefit amount). On October 23, 2008, the U.S.
Department of Labor published a final rule in the Federal Register
changing the definition of ``paying state.'' Effective January 6, 2009,
the definition of ``paying state'' at 20 CFR 616.6(e) is amended to
mean a single state against which the claimant files a CWC, if (1) the
claimant has employment and wages in that state's base period, and (2)
the claimant qualifies for UC in that state using the combined
employment and wages. (73 FR 63068 (Oct. 23, 2008)).
All 50 states, plus the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands are required to participate in
the Interstate Arrangement for Combining Employment and Wages and will
be affected by this change. The attached set of questions and answers
provide guidance to states about the new definition of paying state and
the states' responsibilities for providing CWC filing options.
4. Action. Administrators are requested to provide this information
to appropriate staff.
5. Inquiries. States should direct questions to the appropriate
Regional Office.
6. Attachments.
Attachment 1: Combined-Wage Claims--Questions and Answers
on the New Definition of Paying State.
Attachment 2: States' Responsibilities for Providing
Combined-Wage Claim (CWC) Filing Options Effective January 6, 2009.
Attachment 3: Sample Scripts for Providing Combined-Wage
Claim (CWC) Filing Options.
Attachment 1 to UIPL No. 1-09
Combined-Wage Claims; Questions and Answers on the New Definition of
Paying State
A. New Definition of Paying State
1. Question: How does the new definition of paying state change the
way an individual files a CWC?
Answer: Prior to the new amendment, which becomes effective on
January 6, 2009, the paying state is the state in which the individual
files the CWC (usually the state where the individual is physically
located at the time of filing a CWC), if s/he qualifies for benefits
under the UC law of that state on the basis of combined employment and
wages. The current definition also identifies the paying state when the
individual does not qualify for unemployment benefits under the UC law
of the state in which s/he files the CWC or when the individual applies
for a CWC from Canada.
Effective January 6, 2009, the new definition of paying state for a
CWC is the state against which the individual elects to file a CWC,
provided the individual has employment and wages in that state's base
period(s), and the individual qualifies for UC under the law of that
state using combined employment and wages. (See revised 20 CFR
616.6(e).)
2. Question: What is the earliest possible effective date of an
initial CWC based on the new rule?
Answer: The earliest possible effective date of an initial CWC
based on the new rule is Tuesday, January 6, 2009, in states where the
effective date of an initial claim may begin on a Tuesday. In most
states, where weeks of unemployment begin on Sunday, the earliest
effective date of a CWC is Sunday, January 11, 2009. This means that
individuals filing a CWC in these states during the week beginning
Sunday, January 4, 2009, will be subject to the regulations prior to
the amendment. Individuals filing a CWC during the week beginning
Sunday, January 11, 2009, and thereafter, will be subject to the
amended rule that is effective January 6, 2009.
B. States' Responsibilities Regarding the New Definition of Paying
State
1. Question: When an individual contacts a state about filing a
CWC, what are the state's responsibilities in advising the individual
of his/her options?
Answer: The responsibility of the state varies depending on the
circumstances of the individual.
If the individual has employment and wages in the state, the state
must advise the individual of the state's qualifying requirements and
his/her potential eligibility for benefits (if any) under its law. The
individual must also be told that s/he has the option to file in any
other state(s) where s/he has employment and wages. The state must
advise the individual that there are differences in weekly benefit
amounts and other qualifying requirements (i.e., state laws vary). If
the individual wishes to explore options with any other state(s), the
state must provide information about how to contact any such state(s).
If the individual has no employment and wages in the state, the
state must provide general information about the CWC program and
information about how to contact the state(s) where the individual has
employment and wages. (See Attachment 2.)
2. Question: Does the new definition of paying state require states
to follow any specific order in determining which state is the paying
state for a CWC claim?
Answer: No. Individuals may establish a CWC in any state in which
they have employment and wages in the base period(s) of the state and
qualify based on combining their wages. This includes individuals
residing in Canada who have performed work in the United States.
3. Question: How will individuals determine the appropriate state
to file a CWC?
Answer: The individual is responsible for deciding the state
against which to file a CWC. States receiving inquiries from
individuals potentially eligible to apply for CWCs must assist such
individuals by providing general information about the CWC program
advising that states' programs/entitlements vary and contact
information for the state(s) where the individual worked.
States may refer individuals to America's Service Locator, which is
located at: https://www.servicelocator.org/OWSLinks.asp and/or to
specific states' Web sites.
4. Question: How does the state inform the individual of other
filing
[[Page 5684]]
options when a state determines that an individual is monetarily
ineligible for a CWC after all wage transfers are complete?
Answer: Under the new rule, a state's written determination of
monetary ineligibility under a CWC must contain information indicating
that the individual may file a CWC claim in another state where the
individual has employment and wages during the state's base period(s).
(See revised 20 CFR 616.7(f).) States will meet this requirement by
including a statement such as the following:
You may be eligible for benefits on the basis of combining your
employment and wages in another state where you have worked. To file
a claim, you will need to contact the other state(s) where you
worked.
5. Question: Prior to the new amendment, there were cases where the
paying state did not know if wages from other states were available for
transfer. Does the new definition affect the way states handle these
cases?
Answer: The new amendment does not change current procedures in
this regard. When a state is a potential paying state, it should assist
the individual in filing a CWC when the individual wishes to pursue a
claim. As in the past, there will be some instances where individuals'
wages will not be available for use on a CWC because of administrative
complications. States will need to address these cases on an individual
basis. In some cases, a claim may need to be withdrawn and a backdated
claim filed with another state. States should follow existing
backdating policies and procedures.
6. Question: Does the new definition affect the way Federal
(civilian and/or military) wages are assigned?
Answer: The rules about the assignment of Federal wages have not
changed.
C. CWC Filing Options
1. Question: When an individual has employment and wages in more
than one state, must the individual file a CWC?
Answer: No, filing a CWC remains voluntary on the part of the
individual. (Refer to 20 CFR 616.7(a) and (c).)
2. Question: Under the new definition may an individual establish a
CWC under the law of the state where s/he resides?
Answer: Yes, but only if the individual has sufficient base period
wages to qualify for benefits in the state of residence. An
individual's residence is not relevant in determining the paying state.
(Refer to 20 CFR 616.6(e).)
3. Question: The individual is eligible in State A for a regular
intrastate claim using regular base period wages. State A also has an
alternative base period, but it is available only if the individual is
monetarily ineligible under the state's regular base period. The
individual could also establish eligibility in State B, where s/he has
lag quarter wages, which permits the use of the alternative base period
at the individual's option. What are this individual's filing options?
Answer: The individual has the option to establish: (1) a regular
intrastate UC claim in State A, or (2) an interstate CWC against State
B.
4. Question: Under the new definition, is an individual who has
elected to withdraw a CWC filed in State A able to establish a CWC in
State B in which s/he also has employment and wages?
Answer: Yes, provided the individual is otherwise eligible, does
not have an active claim with available benefits in State A, and has
covered employment and/or wages in State B. The fact that s/he has
withdrawn a prior CWC from State A has no effect on whether s/he may
establish a CWC in State B (or any other state in which s/he had
employment and wages).
5. Question: What impact does the new rule have on the states'
responsibilities for providing claim filing options to individuals
potentially eligible to file CWCs?
Answer: A state will have different responsibilities with respect
to an individual potentially eligible for a CWC depending on whether it
is the CWC ``paying state,'' ``potential paying state,'' ``agent
state,'' or ``inquiry state'' as defined below:
A ``paying state'' is a single state against which the
individual files a CWC, if the individual has employment and wages in
that state's base period(s) and the individual qualifies for UC under
that state's law using combined employment and wages.
A ``potential paying state'' is a state in which an
individual might establish a CWC.
An ``agent state'' is the state that takes the interstate
CWC on behalf of the paying state because the paying state does not
accept interstate claims, including any interstate CWC, by phone/
Internet.
An ``inquiry state'' is the state contacted by an
individual who is potentially eligible for a CWC, but who has no
employment and wages in that state.
There are generally three levels of responsibility states will have
with respect to providing filing options; these include inquiry filing
options, detailed filing options and other filing options. (See
Attachment 2.)
Attachment 2 to UIPL No. 01-09
States' Responsibilities for Providing Combined-Wage Claim (CWC) Filing
Options Effective January 6, 2009
Inquiry Filing Options:
States without base period employment and wages (an
inquiry state) for the individual must provide:
[cir] General information about the CWC program advising that
states' programs/entitlements vary; and,
[cir] Contact information for the state(s) where the individual
worked during the base period(s) of such state(s).
States with base period employment and wages (a potential
paying state) for the individual must provide:
[cir] General information about the CWC program advising programs/
entitlements vary between states;
[cir] Information about its eligibility requirements and the
individual's potential eligibility (including weekly benefit amount,
maximum benefit amount) under its law for:
[dec221] A regular UI claim; and/or a CWC (based on available
information);
[cir] if available, the maximum weekly benefit amount(s) of the
other state(s) where the individual worked; and,
[cir] contact information for the other state(s) where the
individual worked during the base period(s) of such state(s).
Detailed Filing Options:
States with base period employment and wages and any
state(s) against which the individual decides to file a claim must
provide:
[cir] General information about the CWC program advising programs/
entitlements vary between states;
[cir] A review of the individual's work history to determine which
filing options are available; and,
[cir] Information about its eligibility requirements and the
individual's potential eligibility (including weekly benefit amount,
maximum benefit amount) under its law for:
[dec221] A regular UI claim; and/or a CWC.
If a state is an agent state taking the claim on behalf of the
paying state, the agent state will provide detailed filing options
using available information at the time the interstate CWC is filed/
taken.
Other Filing Options:
If a CWC ``paying state'' issues a determination that the
claimant is monetarily ineligible on a CWC after all wages are
transferred, it must provide information to the claimant about his/her
right to establish a claim in another state where s/he worked in its
written
[[Page 5685]]
determination of ineligibility. Language similar to the following will
satisfy this requirement:
[cir] You may be eligible for benefits on the basis of combining
your employment and wages in another state where you have worked. To
file a claim, you will need to contact the other state(s) where you
worked.
Attachment 3 to UIPL 1-09
Sample Scripts for Providing Combined-Wage Claim (CWC) Filing Options
Inquiry Filing Options:
States without base period employment and wages (an
inquiry state) for the individual must provide:
[cir] General information about the CWC program advising that
states' programs/entitlements vary; and
[cir] Contact information for the state(s) where the individual
worked during the base period(s) of such state(s).
An example of information that must be provided to an individual in
a state where the individual has no employment or wages: ``Mr. Jones,
because you have worked in three states, you may be able to establish
an unemployment claim with any of those states under the Combined-Wage
Claim program. Your wages will be combined and the amount of your
benefits will be determined under the law of the state where you file
your combined-wage claim. This might increase your benefit amount. You
should know that state unemployment laws, weekly benefit amounts, and
eligibility requirements vary between the states. I will provide
information to you about how you may contact each of the states where
you have worked to obtain this type of state information and their
filing procedures. Although you may be eligible to receive unemployment
benefits in more than one of these states, you may only establish a
combined-wage claim against one of these states.''
States with base period employment and wages (a potential
paying state) must provide:
[cir] General information about the CWC program advising programs/
entitlements vary between states;
[cir] Information about its eligibility requirements and the
individual's potential eligibility (including weekly benefit amount,
maximum benefit amount) under its law for:
[dec221] A regular UI claim; and/or a CWC (based on available
information);
[cir] If available, the maximum weekly benefit amount(s) of the
other state(s) where the individual worked; and,
[cir] Contact information for the other state(s) where the
individual worked during the base period(s) of such state(s).
An example of information that must be provided to an individual in
a state where the individual has employment and wages (a potential CWC
paying state): ``Mr. Jones, because you have worked in three states
including this one, you may be able to establish an unemployment claim
with any one of these states under the Combined-Wage Claim program.
Your wages will be combined and your monetary entitlement will be
determined under the law of the one state where you file your combined-
wage claim. You should know that state unemployment laws, weekly
benefit amounts, and eligibility requirements vary between the states.
Can you tell me where you have worked in this state? (Follow your
state's procedures on verifying identity.) Thank you. In what other
states did you work? Based on the wages reported by your employer(s),
you would qualify for a weekly benefit amount of $-- and a maximum
benefit amount of $-- if you establish a claim in this state using only
your wages earned here. If you establish a combined-wage claim here
using wages earned in the other state(s), you would potentially qualify
for a weekly benefit amount of $-- and a maximum benefit amount of $--.
This amount is only an estimate and will not become final until all
out-of-state wages are received here. As I mentioned before, state
unemployment laws and benefit amounts vary between the states. Because
of this, you may want to contact the other states where you have worked
to find out your potential eligibility there before making a decision
on which state to file in. Since I have information available
concerning the maximum weekly benefit amounts in the two other states
in which you worked I can provide it to you; the weekly amounts are $--
and $--. I will provide information to you about how you may contact
each of the states where you have worked to obtain information about
your potential entitlement in these states and their filing procedures.
Although you may be eligible to receive unemployment benefits in more
than one of these states, you may only establish a combined-wage claim
against one state. Do you have any questions for me?''
Detailed Filing Options:
States with base period employment and wages and any
state(s) against which the individual decides to file a claim must
provide:
[cir] General information about the CWC program advising programs/
entitlements vary between states;
[cir] A review of the individual's work history to determine which
filing options are available; and,
[cir] Information about its eligibility requirements and the
individual's potential eligibility (including weekly benefit amount,
maximum benefit amount) under its law for:
[dec221] A regular UI claim; and/or a CWC.
If a state is acting as an agent state taking the claim on behalf
of the paying state, the agent state will provide detailed filing
options using available information at the time the interstate CWC is
filed/taken.
Scenario 1. An example of information that must be provided to a
individual when a filing decision (i.e., the state where s/he will file
the CWC) has been made by the individual: ``Mr. Jones, because you have
worked in three states including this one, you may be able to establish
an unemployment claim with any of these states under the Combined-Wage
Claim program. Your wages will be combined and the amount of your
benefits will be determined under the law of the state where you
establish your combined-wage claim. You should know that state
unemployment laws, weekly benefit amounts, and eligibility requirements
vary between the states. Can you tell me where you have worked in this
state? (Follow your state's procedures on verifying identity.) Thank
you. In what other states did you work? Based on the wages reported by
your employer(s), you would qualify for a weekly benefit amount of $--
and a maximum benefit amount of $-- if you establish a claim using only
your wages earned here. If you establish a combined-wage claim here
using wages earned here and in the two other state(s), you would
potentially qualify for a weekly benefit amount of $-- and a maximum
benefit amount of $--. This amount is only an estimate and will not
become final until all out of state wages are received here. As I
mentioned before, state unemployment laws and benefit amounts vary
between the states. Have you contacted the other states in which you
worked to find out about your potential entitlement there? (Claimant
answers yes.) Good. Would you like to establish a combined-wage claim
with this state, using the wages you earned here and wages from the
other two states in which you worked? (Claimant answers yes.) Great, I
have a few more questions for you.''
Scenario 2. An example of information that must be provided to an
individual when there is no employment and wages in the state, the
individual has chosen to file an agent interstate CWC claim, and the
liable CWC state does not accept phone or Internet claims: ``Mr. Jones,
because you have worked in three other states, you may be able to
establish an unemployment
[[Page 5686]]
claim with any of these states under the Combined-Wage Claim program.
Your wages will be combined and the amount of your benefits will be
determined under the law of the one state where you establish your
combined-wage claim. You should know that state unemployment laws,
weekly benefit amounts, and eligibility requirements vary between the
states. Can you tell me where you have worked, the dates of such work
and the states in which you worked? (Follow your state's procedures on
verifying identity.) Thank you. Based on what you have provided to me,
you could establish a claim with any of these states. Have you
contacted any of these states to obtain information about potential
eligibility? (Individual answers yes.) And, do you know which state you
wish to establish a claim with? (Claimant answers yes and indicates s/
he wants to file a claim with State A, which does not accept interstate
claims by phone or Internet.) I will be happy to take your claim
against State A for you. Please keep in mind that I am acting as their
agent in taking your claim. You will receive detailed information about
the amount of benefits for which you qualify and continuing filing
instructions from that state. The exact amount of your entitlement will
not become final until your claim is established and your wages are
transferred to the paying state. I have a few more questions so let's
get started.''
Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of January, 2009.
Douglas F. Small,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E9-2000 Filed 1-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P