Prohibited Transaction Exemptions and Grant of Individual Exemptions Involving: Calpine Corporation, D-11458 (2009-01); Starrett Corporation Pension Plan (the Plan), D-11473 (2009-02); and General Motors Corporation and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (together, GM) (2009-03), 3644-3646 [E9-963]
Download as PDF
3644
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
Public Announcement; Pursuant to the
Government in the Sunshine Act
(Pub. L. 94–409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]
AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Department
of Justice, United States Parole
Commission.
TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday,
January 22, 2009.
PLACE: 5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth
Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.
STATUS: Open.
Matters To Be Considered
The following matters have been
placed on the agenda for the open
Parole Commission meeting:
1. Approval of Minutes of December
2008 Quarterly Business Meeting.
2. Reports from the Chairman,
Commissioners, Chief of Staff, and
Section Administrators. Agency
Contact; Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of
Staff, United States Parole Commission,
(301) 492–5990.
Dated: January 12, 2009.
Rockne J. Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–1050 Filed 1–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions
and Grant of Individual Exemptions
Involving: Calpine Corporation, D–
11458 (2009–01); Starrett Corporation
Pension Plan (the Plan), D–11473
(2009–02); and General Motors
Corporation and Its Wholly Owned
Subsidiaries (together, GM) (2009–03)
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of Individual Exemptions.
SUMMARY: This document contains
exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of
the prohibited transaction restrictions of
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act)
and/or the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal
Register of the pendency before the
Department of a proposal to grant such
exemption. The notice set forth a
summary of facts and representations
contained in the application for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:54 Jan 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
exemption and referred interested
persons to the application for a
complete statement of the facts and
representations. The application has
been available for public inspection at
the Department in Washington, DC. The
notice also invited interested persons to
submit comments on the requested
exemption to the Department. In
addition the notice stated that any
interested person might submit a
written request that a public hearing be
held (where appropriate). The applicant
has represented that it has complied
with the requirements of the notification
to interested persons. No requests for a
hearing were received by the
Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described
in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption
was issued and the exemption is being
granted solely by the Department
because, effective December 31, 1978,
section 102 of Reorganization Plan No.
4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996),
transferred the authority of the Secretary
of the Treasury to issue exemptions of
the type proposed to the Secretary of
Labor.
Statutory Findings
In accordance with section 408(a) of
the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code and the procedures set forth in 29
CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836,
32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes
the following findings:
(a) The exemption is administratively
feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests
of the plan and its participants and
beneficiaries; and
(c) The exemption is protective of the
rights of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan.
Calpine Corporation, Located in
Houston, TX
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
2009–01; Exemption Application No.
D–11459]
Exemption
Effective January 31, 2008, the
restrictions of sections 406(a), 406(b)(1)
and (b)(2), and 407(a) of the Act and the
sanctions resulting from the application
of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of
the Code, shall not apply to (1) the past
acquisition by the Calpine Corporation
Retirement Savings Plan (the Plan) of
warrants (the Warrants) issued by the
Calpine Corporation (the Applicant) that
would have permitted, under certain
conditions, the purchase of shares of
newly issued Calpine Common Stock
(the New Stock) pursuant to certain
bankruptcy proceedings; (2) the holding
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the Warrants by the Plan; and (3) the
disposition of the Warrants. This
exemption is subject to adherence to the
following conditions:
(a) The acquisition and holding of the
Warrants by the Plan occurred in
connection with the Applicant’s
bankruptcy proceedings pursuant to
which all holders of Calpine Common
Stock prior to January 31, 2008 (the Old
Stock) were treated in the same manner;
(b) The Plan had little, if any, ability
to affect the negotiation of the
Applicant’s Plan of Reorganization
pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code;
(c) The Plan acquired the Warrants
automatically and without any action on
the part of the Plan;
(d) The Plan did not pay any fees or
commissions in connection with the
acquisition and holding of the Warrants;
(e) All decisions regarding the holding
and disposition of the Warrants by the
Plan were made in accordance with
Plan provisions for individually
directed investment of participant
accounts by the individual participants
whose accounts in the Plan received the
Warrants; and
(f) The Plan received the same
proportionate number of Warrants as
other owners of Old Stock.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption published on
September 3, 2008 at 73 FR 51524.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Anh-Viet Ly, Department of Labor,
telephone number (202) 693–8648. (This
is not a toll-free number.)
Starrett Corporation Pension Plan (the
Plan), Located in New York, NY
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
2009–02; Application Number: D–
11473]
Exemption
The restrictions of sections 406(a),
406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act, and the
sanctions resulting from the application
of section 4975 of the Code, by reason
of section 4975(c)(1)(A), through (E) of
the Code, shall not apply to the cash
sale (the Sale) by the Plan to the Starrett
Corporation (the Applicant), a party in
interest with respect to the Plan, of a
$25,000 face amount 7.797% secured
senior note (the Security) issued by the
Osprey Trust (the Trust), an Enron
related entity, provided that the
following conditions were satisfied:
(a) The Sale is a one-time transaction
for cash;
(b) The Plan pays no commissions,
fees or other expenses in connection
with the Sale;
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / Notices
(c) The terms and conditions of the
Sale are at least as favorable as those
obtainable in an arm’s length
transaction with an unrelated third
party;
(d) The value of the Security is
determined by Interactive Data Systems,
a qualified, unrelated entity; and
(e) The Plan is a defined benefit plan
which has been terminated and all
benefits have been paid out to Plan
participants and beneficiaries.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption published on
November 20, 2008 at 73 FR 70377.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Brian Buyniski of the Department,
telephone (202) 693–8545. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
General Motors Corporation and Its
Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries (together,
GM), Located in Detroit, MI
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption
2009–03; Exemption Application No.
L–11407]
Exemption
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Section I. Covered Transactions
The restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D), and 406(b)(1)
and (b)(2) of the Act 1 shall not apply,
effective December 16, 2005, to: (1)
Monthly cash advances to GM by the DC
VEBA to reimburse GM for the
estimated mitigation of certain health
care expenses (the Mitigation) and for
the payment of dental expenses
incurred by participants in the DC
VEBA; and (2) an annual ‘‘true up’’ of
the Mitigation payments and dental
expenses against the actual expenses
incurred, with the result that (a) if GM
has been underpaid by the DC VEBA,
GM receives the balance outstanding
from the DC VEBA with interest, or (b)
if the DC VEBA has overpaid GM, GM
reimburses the DC VEBA for the amount
overpaid, with interest.
Section II. Conditions
This exemption is conditioned upon
adherence to the material facts and
representations described herein and
upon satisfaction of the following
conditions:
(a) A committee (the Committee),
acting as a fiduciary independent of
GM, has represented and will continue
to represent the DC VEBA and its
1 Because the Independent Health Care Trust for
UAW Retirees of General Motors Corporation (the
DC VEBA) is not qualified under section 401 of the
Code, there is no jurisdiction under Title II of the
Act pursuant to section 4975 of the Code. However,
there is jurisdiction under Title I of the Act.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:54 Jan 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
participants and beneficiaries for all
purposes with respect to the Mitigation
process.
(b) The Committee for the DC VEBA
has discharged and will continue to
discharge its duties consistent with the
terms of the DC VEBA and the DC VEBA
Settlement Agreement.
(c) The Committee and actuaries
retained by the Committee have
reviewed and approved and will
continue to review and approve the
estimation process involved in the
Mitigation, which results in the monthly
Mitigation amount paid to GM.
(d) Outside auditors retained by the
Committee, along with an
administrative company that is partly
owned by the DC VEBA, will audit the
calculation of the true up to determine
whether there are any differences
between the estimated Mitigation and
actual Mitigation amounts and make
such information available to GM.
(e) GM has provided and will
continue to provide various reports and
records to the Committee concerning the
Mitigation and dental care
reimbursements, which are and will
continue to be subject to review and
audit by the Committee.
(f) The terms of the transactions are
no less favorable and will continue to be
no less favorable to the DC VEBA than
the terms negotiated at arm’s length
under similar circumstances between
unrelated third parties.
(g) The interest rate applied to any
true up payments is a reasonable rate, as
set forth in the DC VEBA Settlement
Agreement, and will continue to be a
reasonable rate that runs from the
beginning of the year being trued up and
does and will continue to not present a
windfall or detriment to either party.
(h) The DC VEBA has not incurred
and will continue not to incur any fees,
costs or other charges (other than those
described in the DC VEBA and the DC
VEBA Settlement Agreement) as a result
of the covered transactions described
herein.
(i) GM and the Committee have
maintained and will continue to
maintain for a period of six years from
the date of any of the covered
transactions, any and all records
necessary to enable the persons
described in paragraph (j) below to
determine whether conditions of this
exemption have been and will continue
to be met, except that (1) a prohibited
transaction will not be considered to
have occurred if, due to circumstances
beyond the control of GM or the
Committee, the records are lost or
destroyed prior to the end of the sixyear period, and (2) no party in interest
other than GM or the Committee shall
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3645
be subject to the civil penalty that may
be assessed under section 502(i) of the
Act if the records are not maintained, or
are not available for examination as
required by paragraph (j) below.
(j)(1) Except as provided in section (2)
of this paragraph and notwithstanding
any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and
(b) of section 504 of the Act, the records
referred to in paragraph (i) above have
been or will be unconditionally
available at their customary location
during normal business hours to:
(A) Any duly authorized employee
representative of the Department;
(B) The UAW or any duly authorized
representative of the UAW;
(C) GM or any duly authorized
representative of GM; and
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of
the DC VEBA, or any duly authorized
representative of such participant or
beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described
above in subparagraphs (1)(B) or (D) of
this paragraph (j) is authorized to
examine the trade secrets of GM, or
commercial or financial information
that is privileged or confidential.
Section III. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption, the
term—
(a) ‘‘GM’’ means General Motors
Corporation and its wholly owned
subsidiaries.
(b) ‘‘Affiliate’’ means:
(1) Any person directly or indirectly,
through one or more intermediaries,
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with such other
person;
(2) Any officer, director, or partner,
employee or relative (as defined in
section 3(15) of the Act) of such other
person; or
(3) Any corporation, partnership or
other entity of which such other person
is an officer, director or partner. (For
purposes of this definition, the term
‘‘control’’ means the power to exercise
a controlling influence over the
management or policies of a person
other than an individual.)
(c) ‘‘Class Members’’ mean all persons
other than active employees who, as of
the ratification date of the GM–UAW
Memorandum of Understanding,
November 11, 2005 (the Ratification
Date) were (1) GM/UAW hourly
employees who had retired from GM
with eligibility for the General Motors
Health Care Program for Hourly
Employees (the Original Plan) as in
effect prior to the Ratification Date or (2)
the spouses, surviving spouses and
dependents of GM/UAW hourly
employees, who, as of the Ratification
Date, were eligible for post-retirement or
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
3646
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 21, 2009 / Notices
surviving spouse health care coverage
under the Original Plan as a
consequence of a GM/UAW hourly
employee’s retirement from GM or death
prior to retirement.
(d) ‘‘Committee’’ means the seven
individuals, consisting of two classes:
(1) the United Auto Workers Class
(UAW) with three members, and (2) the
Public Class with four members, who
act as the named fiduciary and
administrator of the DC VEBA.
(e) ‘‘Court’’ or ‘‘Michigan District
Court’’ means the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of
Michigan.
(f) ‘‘DC VEBA’’ means the
Independent Health Care Trust for UAW
Retirees of General Motors Corporation.
(g) ‘‘DC VEBA Settlement Agreement’’
means the agreement, dated December
16, 2005, which was entered into
between GM, the UAW, and Class
Representatives, on behalf of a Class of
plaintiffs in the Henry case (2006 WL
891151 (E.D. Mi. March 31, 2006)), aff’d
2007 WL 2239208 (6th Cir. August 7,
2007).
(h) ‘‘Mitigation’’ means the reduction
of retirees’ monthly contributions,
annual deductibles, and other retirees’
out-of-pocket costs to the extent
payments from the DC VEBA are made,
as directed by the Committee, to GM
and/or to providers, insurance carriers
and other agreed-upon entities.
(i) ‘‘OPEB’’ means Other PostEmployment Benefits. The OPEB
Valuation is an actuarially developed
annual valuation of a company’s post
employment benefit obligations, other
than for pension and other retirement
income plans. The OPEB Valuation is
based on a set of uniform financial
reporting standards promulgated by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board
and embodied in Financial Accounting
Standard 106, as revised from time to
time. The types of benefits addressed in
an OPEB Valuation typically are retiree
healthcare (medical, dental, vision,
hearing) life insurance, tuition
assistance, day care, legal services, and
the like.
(j) ‘‘Shares’’ or ‘‘Stock’’ refers to
shares of common stock of reorganized
GM, par value $.01 per share.
(k) ‘‘UAW’’ means the International
Union, United Automobile, Aerospace
and Agricultural Implement Workers of
America or the United Auto Workers, if
shortened.
(l) ‘‘VEBA’’ means a voluntary
employees’ beneficiary association.
DATES: Effective Date: This exemption is
effective as of December 16, 2005.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:54 Jan 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
Written Comments
The Department invited all interested
persons to submit written comments
and/or requests for a public hearing
with respect to the notice of proposed
exemption within 30 days of the
publication of such notice in the
Federal Register on July 23, 2008. All
comments were due by September 22,
2008.
During the comment period, the
Department received 159 telephone
calls, 20 letters, and 24 E-mail messages
from participants or beneficiaries of
various GM-sponsored welfare plans.
The Department also received four
requests for a public hearing, all of
which were withdrawn. GM submitted
no comments or hearing requests with
respect to the proposed exemption.
A majority of the comments
concerned the commenter’s inability to
understand the notice of proposed
exemption or the effect of the exemption
on the commenter’s health care benefits.
Of the written comments received,
seven commenters said they were in
favor of the Department’s granting the
exemption while five commenters
objected to the exemption for reasons
that were not germane to the subject
matter of the proposal. In this regard,
the commenters’ objections ranged from
general confusion over the subject
exemption involving the DC VEBA and
another exemption GM will be seeking
in the future for a ‘‘new VEBA,’’to
unhappiness over GM’s decision not to
renew the contract of a service provider
for one of its health care plans.
Accordingly, after giving full
consideration to the entire record,
including the written comments, the
Department has determined to grant the
exemption. For further information
regarding the comments and other
matters discussed herein, interested
persons are encouraged to obtain copies
of the exemption application file
(Exemption Application No. L–11407)
the Department is maintaining in this
case. The complete application file, as
well as all supplemental submissions
received by the Department, are made
available for public inspection in the
Public Documents Room of the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Room N–1513, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
For a more complete statement of the
facts and representations supporting the
Department’s decision to grant this
exemption, refer to the notice of
proposed exemption published on July
23, 2008 at 73 FR 42828.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jan D. Broady at telephone number (202)
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
693–8556. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which among other things
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) This exemption is supplemental to
and not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transactional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption
is subject to the express condition that
the material facts and representations
contained in the application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
January, 2009.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations.
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E9–963 Filed 1–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3644-3646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-963]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions and Grant of Individual
Exemptions Involving: Calpine Corporation, D-11458 (2009-01); Starrett
Corporation Pension Plan (the Plan), D-11473 (2009-02); and General
Motors Corporation and Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries (together, GM)
(2009-03)
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Grant of Individual Exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains exemptions issued by the Department of
Labor (the Department) from certain of the prohibited transaction
restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA or the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code).
A notice was published in the Federal Register of the pendency
before the Department of a proposal to grant such exemption. The notice
set forth a summary of facts and representations contained in the
application for exemption and referred interested persons to the
application for a complete statement of the facts and representations.
The application has been available for public inspection at the
Department in Washington, DC. The notice also invited interested
persons to submit comments on the requested exemption to the
Department. In addition the notice stated that any interested person
might submit a written request that a public hearing be held (where
appropriate). The applicant has represented that it has complied with
the requirements of the notification to interested persons. No requests
for a hearing were received by the Department. Public comments were
received by the Department as described in the granted exemption.
The notice of proposed exemption was issued and the exemption is
being granted solely by the Department because, effective December 31,
1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1
(1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to
issue exemptions of the type proposed to the Secretary of Labor.
Statutory Findings
In accordance with section 408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code and the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990) and based upon
the entire record, the Department makes the following findings:
(a) The exemption is administratively feasible;
(b) The exemption is in the interests of the plan and its
participants and beneficiaries; and
(c) The exemption is protective of the rights of the participants
and beneficiaries of the plan.
Calpine Corporation, Located in Houston, TX
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2009-01; Exemption Application No. D-
11459]
Exemption
Effective January 31, 2008, the restrictions of sections 406(a),
406(b)(1) and (b)(2), and 407(a) of the Act and the sanctions resulting
from the application of section 4975(c)(1)(A) through (E) of the Code,
shall not apply to (1) the past acquisition by the Calpine Corporation
Retirement Savings Plan (the Plan) of warrants (the Warrants) issued by
the Calpine Corporation (the Applicant) that would have permitted,
under certain conditions, the purchase of shares of newly issued
Calpine Common Stock (the New Stock) pursuant to certain bankruptcy
proceedings; (2) the holding of the Warrants by the Plan; and (3) the
disposition of the Warrants. This exemption is subject to adherence to
the following conditions:
(a) The acquisition and holding of the Warrants by the Plan
occurred in connection with the Applicant's bankruptcy proceedings
pursuant to which all holders of Calpine Common Stock prior to January
31, 2008 (the Old Stock) were treated in the same manner;
(b) The Plan had little, if any, ability to affect the negotiation
of the Applicant's Plan of Reorganization pursuant to Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code;
(c) The Plan acquired the Warrants automatically and without any
action on the part of the Plan;
(d) The Plan did not pay any fees or commissions in connection with
the acquisition and holding of the Warrants;
(e) All decisions regarding the holding and disposition of the
Warrants by the Plan were made in accordance with Plan provisions for
individually directed investment of participant accounts by the
individual participants whose accounts in the Plan received the
Warrants; and
(f) The Plan received the same proportionate number of Warrants as
other owners of Old Stock.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the notice of proposed exemption published on September 3, 2008 at 73
FR 51524.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anh-Viet Ly, Department of Labor,
telephone number (202) 693-8648. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Starrett Corporation Pension Plan (the Plan), Located in New York, NY
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2009-02; Application Number: D-11473]
Exemption
The restrictions of sections 406(a), 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the
Act, and the sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975
of the Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A), through (E) of the
Code, shall not apply to the cash sale (the Sale) by the Plan to the
Starrett Corporation (the Applicant), a party in interest with respect
to the Plan, of a $25,000 face amount 7.797% secured senior note (the
Security) issued by the Osprey Trust (the Trust), an Enron related
entity, provided that the following conditions were satisfied:
(a) The Sale is a one-time transaction for cash;
(b) The Plan pays no commissions, fees or other expenses in
connection with the Sale;
[[Page 3645]]
(c) The terms and conditions of the Sale are at least as favorable
as those obtainable in an arm's length transaction with an unrelated
third party;
(d) The value of the Security is determined by Interactive Data
Systems, a qualified, unrelated entity; and
(e) The Plan is a defined benefit plan which has been terminated
and all benefits have been paid out to Plan participants and
beneficiaries.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the notice of proposed exemption published on November 20, 2008 at 73
FR 70377.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Brian Buyniski of the Department,
telephone (202) 693-8545. (This is not a toll-free number.)
General Motors Corporation and Its Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries (together,
GM), Located in Detroit, MI
[Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2009-03; Exemption Application No. L-
11407]
Exemption
Section I. Covered Transactions
The restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(B), 406(a)(1)(D), and
406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act \1\ shall not apply, effective December
16, 2005, to: (1) Monthly cash advances to GM by the DC VEBA to
reimburse GM for the estimated mitigation of certain health care
expenses (the Mitigation) and for the payment of dental expenses
incurred by participants in the DC VEBA; and (2) an annual ``true up''
of the Mitigation payments and dental expenses against the actual
expenses incurred, with the result that (a) if GM has been underpaid by
the DC VEBA, GM receives the balance outstanding from the DC VEBA with
interest, or (b) if the DC VEBA has overpaid GM, GM reimburses the DC
VEBA for the amount overpaid, with interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because the Independent Health Care Trust for UAW Retirees
of General Motors Corporation (the DC VEBA) is not qualified under
section 401 of the Code, there is no jurisdiction under Title II of
the Act pursuant to section 4975 of the Code. However, there is
jurisdiction under Title I of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section II. Conditions
This exemption is conditioned upon adherence to the material facts
and representations described herein and upon satisfaction of the
following conditions:
(a) A committee (the Committee), acting as a fiduciary independent
of GM, has represented and will continue to represent the DC VEBA and
its participants and beneficiaries for all purposes with respect to the
Mitigation process.
(b) The Committee for the DC VEBA has discharged and will continue
to discharge its duties consistent with the terms of the DC VEBA and
the DC VEBA Settlement Agreement.
(c) The Committee and actuaries retained by the Committee have
reviewed and approved and will continue to review and approve the
estimation process involved in the Mitigation, which results in the
monthly Mitigation amount paid to GM.
(d) Outside auditors retained by the Committee, along with an
administrative company that is partly owned by the DC VEBA, will audit
the calculation of the true up to determine whether there are any
differences between the estimated Mitigation and actual Mitigation
amounts and make such information available to GM.
(e) GM has provided and will continue to provide various reports
and records to the Committee concerning the Mitigation and dental care
reimbursements, which are and will continue to be subject to review and
audit by the Committee.
(f) The terms of the transactions are no less favorable and will
continue to be no less favorable to the DC VEBA than the terms
negotiated at arm's length under similar circumstances between
unrelated third parties.
(g) The interest rate applied to any true up payments is a
reasonable rate, as set forth in the DC VEBA Settlement Agreement, and
will continue to be a reasonable rate that runs from the beginning of
the year being trued up and does and will continue to not present a
windfall or detriment to either party.
(h) The DC VEBA has not incurred and will continue not to incur any
fees, costs or other charges (other than those described in the DC VEBA
and the DC VEBA Settlement Agreement) as a result of the covered
transactions described herein.
(i) GM and the Committee have maintained and will continue to
maintain for a period of six years from the date of any of the covered
transactions, any and all records necessary to enable the persons
described in paragraph (j) below to determine whether conditions of
this exemption have been and will continue to be met, except that (1) a
prohibited transaction will not be considered to have occurred if, due
to circumstances beyond the control of GM or the Committee, the records
are lost or destroyed prior to the end of the six-year period, and (2)
no party in interest other than GM or the Committee shall be subject to
the civil penalty that may be assessed under section 502(i) of the Act
if the records are not maintained, or are not available for examination
as required by paragraph (j) below.
(j)(1) Except as provided in section (2) of this paragraph and
notwithstanding any provisions of subsections (a)(2) and (b) of section
504 of the Act, the records referred to in paragraph (i) above have
been or will be unconditionally available at their customary location
during normal business hours to:
(A) Any duly authorized employee representative of the Department;
(B) The UAW or any duly authorized representative of the UAW;
(C) GM or any duly authorized representative of GM; and
(D) Any participant or beneficiary of the DC VEBA, or any duly
authorized representative of such participant or beneficiary.
(2) None of the persons described above in subparagraphs (1)(B) or
(D) of this paragraph (j) is authorized to examine the trade secrets of
GM, or commercial or financial information that is privileged or
confidential.
Section III. Definitions
For purposes of this exemption, the term--
(a) ``GM'' means General Motors Corporation and its wholly owned
subsidiaries.
(b) ``Affiliate'' means:
(1) Any person directly or indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled by, or under common control
with such other person;
(2) Any officer, director, or partner, employee or relative (as
defined in section 3(15) of the Act) of such other person; or
(3) Any corporation, partnership or other entity of which such
other person is an officer, director or partner. (For purposes of this
definition, the term ``control'' means the power to exercise a
controlling influence over the management or policies of a person other
than an individual.)
(c) ``Class Members'' mean all persons other than active employees
who, as of the ratification date of the GM-UAW Memorandum of
Understanding, November 11, 2005 (the Ratification Date) were (1) GM/
UAW hourly employees who had retired from GM with eligibility for the
General Motors Health Care Program for Hourly Employees (the Original
Plan) as in effect prior to the Ratification Date or (2) the spouses,
surviving spouses and dependents of GM/UAW hourly employees, who, as of
the Ratification Date, were eligible for post-retirement or
[[Page 3646]]
surviving spouse health care coverage under the Original Plan as a
consequence of a GM/UAW hourly employee's retirement from GM or death
prior to retirement.
(d) ``Committee'' means the seven individuals, consisting of two
classes: (1) the United Auto Workers Class (UAW) with three members,
and (2) the Public Class with four members, who act as the named
fiduciary and administrator of the DC VEBA.
(e) ``Court'' or ``Michigan District Court'' means the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
(f) ``DC VEBA'' means the Independent Health Care Trust for UAW
Retirees of General Motors Corporation.
(g) ``DC VEBA Settlement Agreement'' means the agreement, dated
December 16, 2005, which was entered into between GM, the UAW, and
Class Representatives, on behalf of a Class of plaintiffs in the Henry
case (2006 WL 891151 (E.D. Mi. March 31, 2006)), aff'd 2007 WL 2239208
(6th Cir. August 7, 2007).
(h) ``Mitigation'' means the reduction of retirees' monthly
contributions, annual deductibles, and other retirees' out-of-pocket
costs to the extent payments from the DC VEBA are made, as directed by
the Committee, to GM and/or to providers, insurance carriers and other
agreed-upon entities.
(i) ``OPEB'' means Other Post-Employment Benefits. The OPEB
Valuation is an actuarially developed annual valuation of a company's
post employment benefit obligations, other than for pension and other
retirement income plans. The OPEB Valuation is based on a set of
uniform financial reporting standards promulgated by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board and embodied in Financial Accounting
Standard 106, as revised from time to time. The types of benefits
addressed in an OPEB Valuation typically are retiree healthcare
(medical, dental, vision, hearing) life insurance, tuition assistance,
day care, legal services, and the like.
(j) ``Shares'' or ``Stock'' refers to shares of common stock of
reorganized GM, par value $.01 per share.
(k) ``UAW'' means the International Union, United Automobile,
Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America or the United
Auto Workers, if shortened.
(l) ``VEBA'' means a voluntary employees' beneficiary association.
DATES: Effective Date: This exemption is effective as of December 16,
2005.
Written Comments
The Department invited all interested persons to submit written
comments and/or requests for a public hearing with respect to the
notice of proposed exemption within 30 days of the publication of such
notice in the Federal Register on July 23, 2008. All comments were due
by September 22, 2008.
During the comment period, the Department received 159 telephone
calls, 20 letters, and 24 E-mail messages from participants or
beneficiaries of various GM-sponsored welfare plans. The Department
also received four requests for a public hearing, all of which were
withdrawn. GM submitted no comments or hearing requests with respect to
the proposed exemption.
A majority of the comments concerned the commenter's inability to
understand the notice of proposed exemption or the effect of the
exemption on the commenter's health care benefits. Of the written
comments received, seven commenters said they were in favor of the
Department's granting the exemption while five commenters objected to
the exemption for reasons that were not germane to the subject matter
of the proposal. In this regard, the commenters' objections ranged from
general confusion over the subject exemption involving the DC VEBA and
another exemption GM will be seeking in the future for a ``new
VEBA,''to unhappiness over GM's decision not to renew the contract of a
service provider for one of its health care plans.
Accordingly, after giving full consideration to the entire record,
including the written comments, the Department has determined to grant
the exemption. For further information regarding the comments and other
matters discussed herein, interested persons are encouraged to obtain
copies of the exemption application file (Exemption Application No. L-
11407) the Department is maintaining in this case. The complete
application file, as well as all supplemental submissions received by
the Department, are made available for public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room
N-1513, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
For a more complete statement of the facts and representations
supporting the Department's decision to grant this exemption, refer to
the notice of proposed exemption published on July 23, 2008 at 73 FR
42828.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jan D. Broady at telephone number
(202) 693-8556. (This is not a toll-free number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption
under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified
person from certain other provisions to which the exemption does not
apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of section
404 of the Act, which among other things require a fiduciary to
discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of the
participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in
accordance with section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does it affect the
requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate
for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) This exemption is supplemental to and not in derogation of, any
other provisions of the Act and/or the Code, including statutory or
administrative exemptions and transactional rules. Furthermore, the
fact that a transaction is subject to an administrative or statutory
exemption is not dispositive of whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
(3) The availability of this exemption is subject to the express
condition that the material facts and representations contained in the
application accurately describes all material terms of the transaction
which is the subject of the exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of January, 2009.
Ivan Strasfeld,
Director of Exemption Determinations. Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. E9-963 Filed 1-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P