In the Matter of: Certain Systems for Detecting and Removing Viruses or Worms, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Cross-Licensing Agreement, 2098-2099 [E9-559]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
2098
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Notices
or by bidders. In addition, the GDIS
should clearly identify the data type
(2–D or 3–D, pre-stack or post-stack and
time or depth); data extent (i.e., number
of line miles for 2D or number of blocks
for 3D) and migration algorithm of the
data and information. The statement
must also include the name and phone
number of a contact person, and an
alternate, who are both knowledgeable
about the information and data listed
and available for 30 days post-sale, the
processing company, date processing
completed, owner of the original data,
original data survey name and permit
number. The MMS reserves the right to
query about alternate data sets and to
quality check and compare the listed
and alternative data sets to determine
which data set most closely meets the
needs of the fair market value
determination process.
The statement must also identify each
block upon which a bidder bid, or
participated in a bid, but for which it
did not use processed or reprocessed
pre- or post-stack geophysical data and
information as part of the decision to
bid or to participate in the bid. The
GDIS must be submitted, even if no
enhanced geophysical data and
information were used for bid
preparation of the tract.
In the event your company supplies
any type of data to the MMS, in order
to get reimbursed, your company must
be registered with the Central Contractor
Registration (CCR) provided via Web
site at: https://www.ccr.gov. This is a
requirement that was implemented on
October 1, 2003, and requires all entities
doing business with the Government to
complete a business profile in CCR and
update it annually. Payments are made
electronically based on the information
contained in CCR. Therefore, if your
company is not actively registered in
CCR, the MMS will not be able to
reimburse or pay your company for any
data supplied.
Please also refer to the Final NOS 208
Package for more detail concerning
submission of the GDIS, making the data
available to the MMS following the
lease sale, preferred format,
reimbursement for costs, and
confidentiality.
Force Majeure: The Regional Director
of the MMS Gulf of Mexico Region has
the discretion to change any date, time,
and/or location specified in the Final
NOS 208 Package in case of a force
majeure event which the Regional
Director deems may interfere with the
carrying out of a fair and proper lease
sale process. Such events may include,
but are not limited to, natural disasters
(e.g., earthquakes, hurricanes, floods),
wars, riots, acts of terrorism, fire,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:01 Jan 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
strikes, civil disorder or other events of
a similar nature. In case of such events,
bidders should call (504) 736–0557 or
access our Web site at: https://
www.gomr.mms.gov for information
about any changes.
Dated: January 6, 2009.
Randall B. Luthi,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. E9–695 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–624]
In the Matter of: Certain Systems for
Detecting and Removing Viruses or
Worms, Components Thereof, and
Products Containing Same; Notice of a
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation Based
on a Cross-Licensing Agreement
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 26) of the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
terminating the above-captioned
investigation based on a cross-licensing
agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., telephone 202–708–
2310, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436. Copies of all nonconfidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
the matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on December 31, 2007, based on a
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
complaint filed on November 21, 2007,
by Trend Micro Incorporated (‘‘Trend
Micro’’) of Cupertino, California. 72 FR
74329–30. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain systems for detecting and
removing viruses or worms, components
thereof, and products containing same
by reason of infringement of claims 2
and 4–22 of U.S. Patent No. 5,623,600
(‘‘the ’600 patent’’). The complaint
named three respondents: Barracuda
Networks, Inc. of Campbell, CA
(‘‘Barracuda’’); Panda Software
International S.L. of Spain; and Panda
Distribution, Inc. of Glendale, CA
(collectively ‘‘Panda’’). The complaint
further alleged that an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
On March 14, 2008, the Commission
issued notice of its determination not to
review an ID granting Trend Micro’s and
Panda’s joint motion to terminate the
investigation as to Panda on the basis of
a settlement agreement. On July 11,
2008, the Commission issued notice of
its determination not to review an ID
granting Trend Micro’s motion to
terminate the investigation in part on
the basis of withdrawal of claims 2, 5–
8, 12, 16–17, 20, and 22 of the ’600
patent. On September 29, 2008, the
Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review an ID
granting Trend Micro’s motion to
terminate the investigation in part on
the basis of withdrawal of claims 14,
and 18–19 of the ’600 patent.
On October 16, 2008, Trend Micro
and Barracuda filed a joint motion to
terminate the investigation on the basis
of a cross-licensing agreement.
The ALJ issued the subject ID on
December 10, 2008, granting the joint
motion to terminate. No party petitioned
for review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR
210.43(a), and the Commission found no
basis for ordering a review on its own
initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44.
The Commission has determined not to
review the ID, and to terminate the
investigation in its entirety.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
sections 210.21(a) and 210.42(h)(3) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(a),
210.42(h)(3)).
By order of the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 9 / Wednesday, January 14, 2009 / Notices
Issued: January 8, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–559 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–666]
In the Matter of Certain Cold Cathode
Fluorescent Lamp (‘‘CCFL’’) Inverter
Circuits and Products Containing
Same; Notice of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 15, 2008, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of O2 Micro
International Ltd. of the Cayman Islands
and O2 Micro Inc. of Santa Clara,
California. A letter supplementing the
complaint was filed on December 24,
2008. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain cold cathode fluorescent lamp
(‘‘CCFL’’) inverter circuits and products
containing same that infringe certain
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,417,382;
6,856,519; 6,809,938; and 7,120,035.
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue
exclusion orders and cease and desist
orders.
The complaint and
supplement, except for any confidential
information contained therein, are
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC
20436, telephone 202–205–2000.
Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
21:01 Jan 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David O. Lloyd, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205–2576.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2008).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
January 8, 2009, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain cold cathode
fluorescent lamp (‘‘CCFL’’) inverter
circuits or products containing same
that infringe one or more of claims 1, 2,
4, 6–9, 11, 13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No.
7,417,382; claim 7 of U.S. Patent No.
6,856,519; claims 1–3 and 6 of U.S.
Patent No. 6,809,938; and claim 4 of
U.S. Patent No. 7,120,035, and whether
an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are —
O2 Micro International Ltd., Grand
Pavilion Commercial Centre, West
Bay Road, Grand Cayman KY1–1209,
Cayman Islands.
02 Micro Inc., 3118 Patrick Henry Drive,
Santa Clara, CA 95054.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Monolithic Power Systems Inc., 6409
Guadalupe Mines Road, San Jose, CA
95120.
Microsemi Corporation, 2381 Morse
Avenue, Irvine, CA 92614.
ASUSTeK Computer Inc., No. 15, Li-Te
Road Peitou, Taipei, Taiwan.
ASUSTeK Computer International
America, 800 Corporate Way,
Fremont, CA 94539.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2099
LG Electronics, LG Twin Towers
20,Yoido-dong, Youngdungpo-gu
Seoul, Korea 150–721.
LG Electronics U.S.A., 1000 Sylvan
AvenueEnglewood Cliffs, NJ 07632.
LG Display Co., Ltd., West Tower, LG
Twin Towers, 20,Yoido-dong,
Youngdungpo-gu, Seoul, Korea 150–
721.
LG Display America, Inc., 150 East
Brokaw Road, San Jose, CA 95112.
BenQ Corporation, 16 Jihu Road, Neihu,
Taipei 114, Taiwan.
BenQ America Corp., 15375
BarrancaSuite A205Irvine, CA 92618.
(c) The Commission investigative
attorney, party to this investigation, is
David O. Lloyd, Esq., Office of Unfair
Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade
Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: January 8, 2009.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–561 Filed 1–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM
14JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2098-2099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-559]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-624]
In the Matter of: Certain Systems for Detecting and Removing
Viruses or Worms, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same;
Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Cross-Licensing
Agreement
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 26) of the presiding administrative law judge
(``ALJ'') terminating the above-captioned investigation based on a
cross-licensing agreement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., telephone 202-
708-2310, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Copies of all
nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information
on the matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal on 202-205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on December 31, 2007, based on a complaint filed on November 21, 2007,
by Trend Micro Incorporated (``Trend Micro'') of Cupertino, California.
72 FR 74329-30. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain systems for detecting and removing viruses
or worms, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of
infringement of claims 2 and 4-22 of U.S. Patent No. 5,623,600 (``the
'600 patent''). The complaint named three respondents: Barracuda
Networks, Inc. of Campbell, CA (``Barracuda''); Panda Software
International S.L. of Spain; and Panda Distribution, Inc. of Glendale,
CA (collectively ``Panda''). The complaint further alleged that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
On March 14, 2008, the Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review an ID granting Trend Micro's and Panda's
joint motion to terminate the investigation as to Panda on the basis of
a settlement agreement. On July 11, 2008, the Commission issued notice
of its determination not to review an ID granting Trend Micro's motion
to terminate the investigation in part on the basis of withdrawal of
claims 2, 5-8, 12, 16-17, 20, and 22 of the '600 patent. On September
29, 2008, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to
review an ID granting Trend Micro's motion to terminate the
investigation in part on the basis of withdrawal of claims 14, and 18-
19 of the '600 patent.
On October 16, 2008, Trend Micro and Barracuda filed a joint motion
to terminate the investigation on the basis of a cross-licensing
agreement.
The ALJ issued the subject ID on December 10, 2008, granting the
joint motion to terminate. No party petitioned for review of the ID
pursuant to 19 CFR 210.43(a), and the Commission found no basis for
ordering a review on its own initiative pursuant to 19 CFR 210.44. The
Commission has determined not to review the ID, and to terminate the
investigation in its entirety.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in sections 210.21(a) and 210.42(h)(3) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(a), 210.42(h)(3)).
By order of the Commission.
[[Page 2099]]
Issued: January 8, 2009.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-559 Filed 1-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
