Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by International Securities Exchange, LLC Relating to Amending the Fee Schedule, 1740-1741 [E9-413]
Download as PDF
1740
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–438 Filed 1–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–59201; File No. SR–ISE–
2008–101]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change by
International Securities Exchange, LLC
Relating to Amending the Fee
Schedule
January 6, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
31, 2008, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend
its Schedule of Fees with respect to
equity transactions. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Internet Web site at https://
www.ise.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Purpose—Currently, the Exchange’s
Schedule of Fees for equity transactions
consists of a tiered rebate structure for
securities priced at or above $1.00
across all Tapes, averaged across an
entire month, where the first five
million maker shares executed on an
average daily volume (ADV) basis
receive a rebate of $0.0032 per share,
with an increase in the rebate to $0.0035
for each maker share executed above
five million ADV.
The Exchange now proposes to
rescind the tiered rebate structure and
implement a flat rebate, irrespective of
ADV. The Exchange is amending the fee
schedule in an effort to increase order
flow in securities that are reported to
Tape B. Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to adopt a fee structure for
transactions in securities priced at or
above $1.00 (excluding both order
delivery and MidPoint Match orders)
whereby the maker receives a per share
rebate of $0.0035 for transactions in
securities that are reported to Tape B
and a per share rebate of $0.0029 for
transactions in securities that are
reported to Tape A and Tape C. The
aforementioned fee changes will become
operative on January 2, 2009.
The execution fee for orders that
remove liquidity for securities, across
all tapes, that trade at or above $1.00
will remain unchanged at $0.003. The
execution fee for orders that remove
liquidity for securities, across all tapes,
priced under $1.00 remains unchanged,
at 0.3% of trade value with no rebates
for adding liquidity in such securities.
Basis—The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,3
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4),4 in particular, in that it
is designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among its members and
other persons using its facilities. In
particular, raising the rebate in Tape B
securities may provide incentive to
members to send order flow to the ISE
for securities reported to Tape B.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 5 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) 6
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2008–101 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2008–101. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
9 17
1 15
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:10 Jan 12, 2009
3 15
4 15
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
5 15
6 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 19b–4(f)(2).
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2009 / Notices
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2008–101 and should be submitted on
or before February 3, 2009.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–413 Filed 1–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–59212, File No. SR–MSRB–
2008–07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board; Order Granting Approval of
Proposed Rule Change as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Relating to MSRB
Rule G–34, CUSIP Numbers and New
Issue Requirements, to Establish a
Transparency System for Municipal
Auction Rate Securities and Municipal
Variable Rate Demand Obligations
January 7, 2009.
On November 18, 2008, the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board (‘‘MSRB’’),
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to MSRB Rule G–
34, CUSIP Numbers and New Issue
Requirements, to establish a
transparency system for municipal
auction rate securities and municipal
variable rate demand obligations. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
7 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:10 Jan 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
November 28, 2008.3 The Commission
received three comment letters about
the proposed rule change.4 On January
2, 2009, the MSRB filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change.5 This
order approves the proposed rule
change as modified by Amendment No.
1.
The proposed rule change would
establish a transparency system for
municipal Auction Rate Securities
(‘‘ARS’’) and municipal Variable Rate
Demand Obligations (‘‘VRDO’’). The
proposed rule change would: (i)
Implement an electronic system that
would collect and disseminate ARS and
VRDO information (the ‘‘Short-term
Obligation Rate Transparency System
Proposal’’); (ii) provide free public
access to information disseminated from
the Short-term Obligation Rate
Transparency (‘‘SHORT’’) System
through the MSRB’s Electronic
Municipal Market Access (EMMA)
system (the ‘‘EMMA short-term
obligation rate transparency service’’);
and (iii) amend Rule G–34, on CUSIP
numbers and new issue requirements, to
require brokers, dealers and municipal
securities dealers (collectively
‘‘dealers’’) to report, or ensure the
reporting of, interest rate and
descriptive information to the SHORT
System about ARS and VRDO following
an ARS auction or VRDO interest rate
reset. A full description of the proposal
is contained in the Commission’s
Notice.
As previously noted, the Commission
received three comment letters relating
to the proposed rule change.6 The
commenters generally supported the
concept of the proposal, but raised
concerns about the timing of its
implementation and certain data points
required to be collected. WFBS
commented only with respect to the
proposed effective date of the proposal.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58998
(Nov. 21, 2008), 73 FR 72540 (Nov. 28, 2008)
(‘‘Commission’s Notice’’).
4 See letter from Jeffrey A. Schuh, Vice President,
Chief Compliance Officer, Wells Fargo Brokerage
Services, LLC (‘‘WFBS’’), dated December 18, 2008;
letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director
and Associate General Counsel, Securities Industry
and Financial Markets Association (‘‘SIFMA’’),
dated December 19, 2008; and letter from Michael
Decker and Mike Nicholas, Co-Chief Executive
Officers, Regional Bond Dealers Association
(‘‘RBDA’’), dated December 29, 2008.
5 In Amendment No. 1, the MSRB responded to
the three comment letters and, in response to the
comment letters, postponed the effective date of the
proposed amendments to Rule G–34 that relate to
Variable Rate Demand Obligations from January 30,
2009 to April 1, 2009. The proposed January 30,
2009 effective date for the proposed amendments to
Rule G–34 that relate to Auction Rate Securities
remains unchanged. This is a technical amendment
and is not subject to notice and comment.
6 See supra note 4.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1741
WFBS requested that the
implementation date of the proposal be
extended to four months from the date
of publication of the final rule so that
changes needed to support the SHORT
proposal could be designed, thoroughly
tested and implemented prior to the
proposed implementation date.
SIFMA supported the concept of
collection and display of auction rate
reset and remarketing rate reset
information, and focused its comments
on the timing of implementation and
certain data points proposed to be
collected. SIFMA stated that its
members feel strongly that January 30,
2009 is an unrealistically short
timeframe for implementing the new
regulatory requirement. SIFMA noted
that this year has been a historic year for
technological and operational issues
due to the market dislocation, and that
this as well as other issues have resulted
in many urgent technology and
operation projects queued at broker
dealer firms. SIFMA requested that the
proposal be delayed until the later of
April 1, 2009 or 90 days after the final
rule is approved by the SEC.
SIFMA also recommended that
maximum and minimum VRDO rates
not be required by the SHORT system.
SIFMA stated that the terms of VRDO
securities, by and large, have been
negotiated on a bespoke basis for each
transaction, that maximum rate
formulas are not standardized, and that
the administrative burden of calculating
and reporting the maximum rate for
every reset period is in excess of the
theoretical benefits it provides. SIFMA
also found no evidence of minimum
rates in any VRDO transaction and
stated that this is a superfluous field
which should be eliminated.
SIFMA stated that the broker dealers
regulated by the MSRB do not have
control over all of the ARS data points
being requested in the proposal because
broker dealers merely receive the
auction information from the auction
agent. Therefore SIFMA believes that
there should be an acknowledgement in
Rule G–34(c)(i) that the broker dealer is
only responsible for forwarding the
information it has received from the
auction agent and not be responsible for
the accuracy of that data.
RBDA stated in its letter that they
support the implementation of the
proposal as early as is practical, but
believe the intended effective date of
January 30, 2009 will not give market
participants sufficient time to
implement and thoroughly test
automated systems that will facilitate
compliance with rules associated with
the new system. RBDA requested that
the effective date for full
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1740-1741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-413]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-59201; File No. SR-ISE-2008-101]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by International Securities
Exchange, LLC Relating to Amending the Fee Schedule
January 6, 2009.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 31, 2008, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees with
respect to equity transactions. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Internet Web site at https://www.ise.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
Purpose--Currently, the Exchange's Schedule of Fees for equity
transactions consists of a tiered rebate structure for securities
priced at or above $1.00 across all Tapes, averaged across an entire
month, where the first five million maker shares executed on an average
daily volume (ADV) basis receive a rebate of $0.0032 per share, with an
increase in the rebate to $0.0035 for each maker share executed above
five million ADV.
The Exchange now proposes to rescind the tiered rebate structure
and implement a flat rebate, irrespective of ADV. The Exchange is
amending the fee schedule in an effort to increase order flow in
securities that are reported to Tape B. Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to adopt a fee structure for transactions in securities priced
at or above $1.00 (excluding both order delivery and MidPoint Match
orders) whereby the maker receives a per share rebate of $0.0035 for
transactions in securities that are reported to Tape B and a per share
rebate of $0.0029 for transactions in securities that are reported to
Tape A and Tape C. The aforementioned fee changes will become operative
on January 2, 2009.
The execution fee for orders that remove liquidity for securities,
across all tapes, that trade at or above $1.00 will remain unchanged at
$0.003. The execution fee for orders that remove liquidity for
securities, across all tapes, priced under $1.00 remains unchanged, at
0.3% of trade value with no rebates for adding liquidity in such
securities.
Basis--The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\3\ in general,
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\4\ in particular, in
that it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members and other
persons using its facilities. In particular, raising the rebate in Tape
B securities may provide incentive to members to send order flow to the
ISE for securities reported to Tape B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \6\ thereunder. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\6\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2008-101 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2008-101. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written
[[Page 1741]]
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in the Commission's Public
Reference Room on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m.
and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2008-101 and should be
submitted on or before February 3, 2009.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-413 Filed 1-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P