Bureau of International Labor Affairs; Request for Information on Efforts by Certain Countries To Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child Labor, 77841-77844 [E8-30140]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of November 5, 2008
(73 FR 65881). The conference was held
in Washington, DC, on November 17,
2008, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these investigations to
the Secretary of Commerce on December
15, 2008. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
4054 (December 2008), entitled
Commodity Matchbooks from India:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–459 and
731–TA–1155 (Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 15, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–30178 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register on June 11, 2008 (73
FR 33116). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on October 16, 2008,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on December 15,
2008. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4052
(December 2008), entitled Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bar from Turkey:
Investigation No. 731–TA–745 (Second
Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 15, 2008.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–30179 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–745 (Second
Review)]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
Turkey; Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on steel concrete reinforcing bar
from Turkey would not be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.2
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on February 1, 2008 (73 FR 6206)
and determined on May 6, 2008 that it
would conduct a full review (73 FR
27847, May 14, 2008). Notice of the
scheduling of the Commission’s review
and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR § 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioners Charlotte R. Lane and Irving A.
Williamson dissenting.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
Notice is hereby given that on
December 9, 2008, a Complaint was
filed and a proposed Consent Decree
was lodged with the United States
District Court for the District of
Massachusetts in United States of
America v. City of Attleboro,
Massachusetts, et al., Civil Action No.
1:08–cv–120378.
In this action the United States seeks
reimbursement of response costs
incurred by EPA for response actions at
the Shpack Landfill Superfund Site
(‘‘Site’’) in Norton and Attleboro
Massachusetts, and performance of
studies and response work at the Site
consistent with the National
Contingency Plan, 40 CFR part 300,
pursuant to Sections 106 and 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental,
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607
(‘‘CERCLA’’). The Consent Decree
provides that the settling parties will
perform the chemical portion of the
cleanup work at the Site, currently
estimated at $29 million, as well as
reimburse EPA for up to $2.9 million of
EPA’s future costs. The Consent Decree
includes a covenant not to sue by the
United States under Sections 106 and
107 of CERCLA, §§ 9606 and 9607, and
Section 7003 of the Resource
PO 00000
Frm 00251
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77841
Conservation and Recovery Act
(‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6973.
The Department of Justice will receive
for a period of thirty (30) days from the
date of this publication comments
relating to the Consent Decree.
Commenters may request an
opportunity for a public meeting in the
affected area, in accordance with
Section 7003(d). Comments should be
addressed to the Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611, and should refer to United
States v. City of Attleboro,
Massachusetts, et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–2–
08360.
The Consent Decree may be examined
at the Office of the United States
Attorney, 1 Courthouse Way, John
Joseph Moakely Courthouse, Suite 9200,
Boston, MA 02210, and U.S. EPA
Region 1, One Congress St., Suite 1100,
Boston, MA 02114. During the public
comment period, the Consent Decree
may also be examined on the following
Department of Justice Web site, https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
Consent Decree may also be obtained by
mail from the Consent Decree Library,
P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or
by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia
Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov),
fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone
confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In
requesting a copy from the Consent
Decree Library, please enclose a check
in the amount of $125.50 (25 cents per
page reproduction cost) payable to the
U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax,
forward a check in that amount to the
Consent Decree Library at the stated
address.
Ronald G. Gluck,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. E8–30142 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of International Labor Affairs;
Request for Information on Efforts by
Certain Countries To Eliminate the
Worst Forms of Child Labor
AGENCY: The Bureau of International
Labor Affairs, United States Department
of Labor.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77842
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
ACTION: Request for information on
efforts by certain countries to eliminate
the worst forms of child labor.
SUMMARY: This notice is a request for
information for use by the Department
of Labor (DOL) in preparation of an
annual report on certain trade
beneficiary countries’ implementation
of international commitments to
eliminate the worst forms of child labor.
This will be the eighth such report by
DOL under the Trade and Development
Act of 2000 (TDA).
DATES: Submitters of information are
requested to provide their submission to
the Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor
and Human Trafficking at the e-mail or
physical address below by 5 p.m.,
January 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: E-mail submissions should
be addressed to Tina McCarter at
mccarter.tina@dol.gov. Written
submissions should be addressed to Ms.
McCarter at the Office of Child Labor,
Forced Labor and Human Trafficking,
Bureau of International Labor Affairs,
USDOL, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room S–5317, Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina
McCarter or Charita Castro, Bureau of
International Labor Affairs, Office of
Child Labor, Forced Labor and Human
Trafficking, at (202) 693–4843, fax: (202)
693–4830, or via e-mail to mccartertina@dol.gov or castro.charita@dol.gov.
DOL’s international child labor reports
can be found on the Internet at https://
www.dol.gov/ILAB/media/reports/iclp/
main.htm or can be obtained from the
Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor and
Human Trafficking.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Trade
and Development Act of 2000 [Pub. L.
106–200] established a new eligibility
criterion for receipt of trade benefits
under the Generalized System of
Preferences (GSP), Caribbean Basin
Trade and Partnership Act (CBTPA),
and Africa Growth and Opportunity Act
(AGOA). The TDA amends the GSP
reporting requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974 (Section 504) [19 U.S.C. 2464]
to require that the President’s annual
report on the status of internationally
recognized worker rights include
‘‘findings by the Secretary of Labor with
respect to the beneficiary country’s
implementation of its international
commitments to eliminate the worst
forms of child labor.’’ Title II of the TDA
and the TDA Conference Report [Joint
Explanatory Statement of the Committee
of Conference, 106th Cong.2d.sess.
(2000)] indicate that the same criterion
applies for the receipt of benefits under
CBTPA and AGOA, respectively.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
In addition, the Andean Trade
Preference Act (ATPA), as amended and
expanded by the Andean Trade
Promotion and Drug Eradication Act
(ATPDEA) [Pub. L. 107–210, Title
XXXI], includes as a criterion for
receiving benefits ‘‘[w]hether the
country has implemented its
commitments to eliminate the worst
forms of child labor as defined in
section 507(6) of the Trade Act of 1974.’’
Scope of Report
Countries and non-independent
countries and territories presently
eligible under the GSP and to be
included in the report are: Afghanistan,
Albania, Algeria, Angola, Anguilla,
Argentina, Armenia, Bangladesh, Belize,
Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, British
Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin
Islands, Burkina Faso, Burundi,
Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde,
Central African Republic, Chad,
Christmas Island, Cocos Islands,
Colombia, Comoros, Democratic
Republic of the Congo, Republic of
Congo, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Cote
d’Ivoire, Croatia, Djibouti, Dominica,
East Timor, Ecuador, Egypt, Equatorial
Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Falkland
Islands, Fiji, Gabon, the Gambia,
Georgia, Ghana, Gibraltar, Grenada,
Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti,
Heard Island and MacDonald Islands,
India, Indonesia, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan,
Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kyrgyz
Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia,
Macedonia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali,
Mauritania, Mauritius, Moldova,
Mongolia, Montenegro, Montserrat,
Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger,
Nigeria, Niue, Norfolk Island, Oman,
Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea,
Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Pitcairn
Islands, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Helena,
Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint
Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Sao
´
Tome and Principe, Senegal, Serbia,
Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Solomon
Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Sri
Lanka, Suriname, Swaziland, Tanzania,
Thailand, Togo, Tokelau Island, Tonga,
Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey,
Turks and Caicos Islands, Tuvalu,
Uganda, Ukraine, Uruguay, Uzbekistan,
Vanuatu, Venezuela, Wallis and Futuna,
West Bank and Gaza Strip, Western
Sahara, Republic of Yemen, Zambia,
and Zimbabwe.
Countries eligible or potentially
eligible for additional benefits under the
AGOA and to be included in the report
are: Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina
Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde,
Chad, Comoros, Republic of Congo,
Democratic Republic of the Congo,
Djibouti, Ethiopia, Gabon, the Gambia,
PO 00000
Frm 00252
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Kenya,
Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi,
Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius,
Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria,
Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe,
Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South
Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo,
Uganda, and Zambia.
Countries potentially eligible for
additional benefits under the CBTPA
and to be included in the report are:
Barbados, Belize, Costa Rica, Guyana,
Haiti, Jamaica, Panama, Saint Lucia, and
Trinidad and Tobago.
Countries potentially eligible for
additional benefits under the ATPA/
ATPDEA and to be included in the
report are: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador,
and Peru.
In addition, the following countries
will be included in the report as
required by the Department of Labor
Appropriations, 2006, Conference
Report, H.R. Rep. 109–337 (2005):
Bahrain, Chile, Dominican Republic, El
Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras,
Morocco, and Nicaragua.
Information Sought
The Department invites interested
parties to submit information relevant to
the findings to be made by DOL under
the TDA for all listed countries.
Information provided through public
submission will be considered by DOL
in preparing its findings. Materials
submitted should be confined to the
specific topic of the study. In particular,
DOL’s Bureau of International Labor
Affairs is seeking submissions on the
following topics:
1. Whether the country has adequate
laws and regulations proscribing the
worst forms of child labor. Specifically,
DOL is seeking the following
information:
(a) What laws have been promulgated
on child labor? What is the country’s
minimum age for admission to work?
Are there exceptions to the minimum
age law? What is the minimum age for
admission to hazardous work, and what
additional provisions have been enacted
regarding children’s involvement in
hazardous work?
(b) What laws have been promulgated
on the worst forms of child labor, such
as forced child labor and trafficking or
child prostitution and pornography?
Please specify what worst forms of child
labor are prohibited and describe
penalties for violations. What is the
minimum age for military recruitment
and/or involvement in armed conflict?
(c) If the country has ratified
International Labor Organization (ILO)
Convention 182, has it developed a list
of occupations considered to be worst
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
forms of child labor, as called for in
article 4 of the Convention?
2. Whether the country has adequate
laws and regulations as well as formal
institutional mechanisms for the
implementation and enforcement of
such laws and regulations; specifically:
(a) What legal remedies are available
to government agencies that enforce
child labor and worst forms of child
labor laws (civil fines, criminal
penalties, court orders, etc.), and are
they adequate to deter violations?
(b) To what extent are violations
investigated and addressed?
(c) What level of resources does the
government devote to investigating
child labor and worst forms of child
labor cases? How many inspectors does
the government employ to address child
labor? How many police or other law
enforcement officials address worst
forms of child labor issues? How many
child labor investigations have been
conducted over the past year and how
many have resulted in fines, penalties,
or convictions? How many
investigations into worst forms of child
labor violations have been conducted
over the past year and how many have
resulted in prosecutions and
convictions?
(d) Has the government provided
training activities for officials charged
with enforcing child labor or worst
forms of child labor laws?
3. Whether social programs exist in
the country to prevent the engagement
of children in the worst forms of child
labor, and to assist in the removal of
children engaged in the worst forms of
child labor; specifically:
(a) What initiatives has the
government supported specifically to
prevent or withdraw children from
exploitive work situations, such as
school scholarships conditioned on a
child’s withdrawal from child labor? (If
possible, please provide information on
funding levels for such initiatives.)
4. Whether the country has a
comprehensive policy for the
elimination of the worst forms of child
labor; specifically:
(a) Does the country have a
comprehensive policy or national
program of action on child labor or any
of its forms?
(b) Does the country specifically
incorporate child labor in poverty
reduction, development, educational or
other social policies or programs, such
as Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers,
etc.? If so, to what degree has the
country implemented the policy and/or
program of action and achieved its goals
and objectives?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
(c) Is education free in law and in
practice? Is education compulsory in
law and in practice?
Please note that although many antipoverty programs may have indirect
impacts on child labor, the TDA calls
for governments to take specific actions
to address the problem. Therefore, the
DOL’s report focuses, and information is
requested on, efforts that name child
labor as an explicit objective, target
group, or condition for participation in
government policies and programs.
5. Whether the country is making
continual progress toward eliminating
the worst forms of child labor;
specifically:
(a) In what sectors/work activities/
goods do children work and how has
this changed over the past year?
Information on age and gender of
working children, disaggregated by
industry/work activity/good, is
appreciated.
Please note that in order to provide
comparable statistics on child work and
education across countries in the TDA
report, DOL relies on the Understanding
Children’s Work Project (see https://
www.ucw-project.org/) and UNESCO
Institute of Statistics data (https://
stats.uis.unesco.org/); therefore, such
data is NOT being requested in this
Notice.
(b) To what extent are children
working in slavery or practices similar
to slavery, such as debt bondage,
serfdom, and forced or compulsory
labor? Please indicate industries where
this occurs and, if applicable, specific
goods that such children produce.
(c) To what extent are children
trafficked to work? Are children
trafficked for commercial sex or for
labor exploitation? Information on the
industries into which children are
trafficked and the goods that they
produce in this situation is appreciated.
Are they trafficked across national
borders or within the country (specify
source, destination and transit
countries/regions/communities, if
possible).
DOL greatly appreciates submission of
original sources. Information submitted
may include reports, newspaper articles,
or other materials. Governments that
have ratified ILO Convention 182 are
requested to submit copies of their most
recent article 22 submissions under the
Convention, especially those with
information on types of work
determined in accordance with article 4
of the Convention. Copies of any recent
government child labor surveys or data
sets are also particularly appreciated.
PO 00000
Frm 00253
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77843
Definition of Worst Forms of Child
Labor
The term ‘‘worst forms of child labor’’
is defined in section 412(b) of the TDA
as comprising:
‘‘(A) all forms of slavery or practices
similar to slavery, such as the sale and
trafficking of children, debt bondage
and serfdom and forced or compulsory
labor, including forced or compulsory
recruitment of children for use in armed
conflict;
(B) the use, procuring or offering of a
child for prostitution, for the production
of pornography or for pornographic
performances;
(C) the use, procuring or offering of a
child for illicit activities, in particular
for the production and trafficking of
drugs as defined in relevant
international treaties; and
(D) work which, by its nature or the
circumstances in which it is carried out,
is likely to harm the health, safety or
morals of children.’’
The TDA Conference Report noted
that the phrase, ‘‘work which, by its
nature or the circumstances in which it
is carried out, is likely to harm the
health, safety or morals of children,’’ is
to be defined as in article II of
Recommendation No. 190, which
accompanies ILO Convention 182. This
includes:
‘‘(a) Work which exposes children to
physical, psychological, or sexual abuse;
(b) Work underground, under water,
at dangerous heights or in confined
spaces;
(c) Work with dangerous machinery,
equipment and tools, or which involves
the manual handling or transport of
heavy loads;
(d) Work in an unhealthy
environment which may, for example,
expose children to hazardous
substances, agents or processes, or to
temperatures, noise levels, or vibrations
damaging to their health;
(e) Work under particularly difficult
conditions such as work for long hours
or during the night or work where the
child is unreasonably confined to the
premises of the employer.’’
The TDA Conference Report further
indicated that this phrase be interpreted
in a manner consistent with the intent
of article 4 of ILO Convention 182,
which states that such work shall be
determined by national laws or
regulations or by the competent
authority in the country involved. In
addition, the TDA Conference report
indicated that the phrase generally not
apply to situations in which children
work for their parents on bona fide
family farms or holdings.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77844
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
This notice is a general solicitation of
comments from the public.
this solicitation, and details how
grantees will be selected.
Part I. Funding Opportunity
Description
Marcia Eugenio,
Acting Associate Deputy Under Secretary,
International Labor Affairs Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8–30140 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
KEY DATES: The closing date for receipt
of applications under this
announcement is February 19, 2009.
Applications must be received at the
address below no later than 4 p.m.
(Eastern Time). A Virtual Prospective
Applicant Conference will be held for
this grant competition in January. The
date and access information for this
Virtual Prospective Applicant
Conference will be posted on the ETA
Web site at: https://
www.workforce3one.org/.
A. Background
BILLING CODE 4510–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Availability of Funds and
Solicitation for Grant Applications for
the Older Worker Demonstration
Announcement Type: Notice of
Solicitation for Grant Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/
DFA PY–08–06.
Catalog Federal Assistance Number:
17.268.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Labor
(DOL), Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) announces the
availability of approximately $10
million in funds for Older Worker
Demonstration Grants. These grants will
be awarded though a competitive
process as a part of the High Growth Job
Training Initiative (HGJTI). The grants
are intended to address the workforce
challenges facing older individuals by
developing models for talent
development in regional economies that
recognize older workers as a valuable
labor pool and include employment and
training strategies to retain and/or
connect older workers to jobs in high
growth, high demand industries critical
to the regional economy.
Grants awarded under the Older
Worker Demonstration should focus on
providing training and related services
for individuals age 55 and older that
result in employment and advancement
opportunities in high growth industries
and economic sectors. The proposed
strategies must take place in the context
of regional talent development efforts
designed to contribute to a strong
regional economy, and must be
developed and implemented by a
strategic regional partnership. The
preferred eligible applicants for this
solicitation are entities that represent
the local workforce investment system,
but other entities may apply. It is
anticipated that the number of awards
will range from 10 to 13, with award
amounts ranging from $750,000 to
$1,000,000.
This solicitation provides background
information and describes the
application submission requirements,
outlines the process that eligible entities
must use to apply for funds covered by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
Mailed applications must be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: Melissa
Abdullah, Reference SGA/DFA PY–08–
06, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room N–4716, Washington, DC 20210.
Applicants may alternatively apply online through Grants.gov as discussed in
Part IV(C) of this solicitation.
Telefacsimile (FAX) applications will
not be accepted. Applicants are advised
that U.S. Postal Service mail delivery in
the Washington area may be delayed
due to mail decontamination
procedures. Hand delivered proposals
will be received at the above address.
ADDRESSES:
This
solicitation consists of eight parts:
• Part I provides the funding
opportunity description. It contains
background on talent development in
the global economy, the aging of the
American workforce, and the workforce
challenges faced by older individuals;
provides information on the Older
Worker Demonstration; and outlines the
critical elements and focus areas for this
solicitation.
• Part II describes the award amount
and performance period for the award.
• Part III describes the eligible
applicants and other grant
specifications.
• Part IV provides information on the
application and submission process and
various funding restrictions.
• Part V describes the criteria against
which applications will be reviewed
and explains the review and selection
process.
• Part VI provides award
administration information.
• Part VII contains ETA agency
contact information.
• Part VIII lists additional resources
of interest to applicants and other
information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00254
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. Talent Development in a Global
Economy
Globalization of the economic
marketplace is now well recognized, as
is the fact that American businesses
must now compete not only with
companies across the street, but also
with companies across the globe. Global
competition is typically seen as a
national challenge. In reality, regions
are where companies, workers,
researchers, entrepreneurs and
governments come together to create a
competitive advantage in the global
marketplace. That advantage stems from
the ability to transform new ideas and
new knowledge into advanced, high
quality products or services—in other
words, to innovate.
Regions that are successful in creating
a competitive advantage demonstrate
the ability to organize ‘‘innovation
assets’’—people, institutions, capital,
and infrastructure—to generate growth
and prosperity in the region’s economy.
These regions are successful because
they have connected three key elements:
workforce skills and lifelong learning
strategies, investment and
entrepreneurship strategies, and
regional infrastructure and economic
development strategies.
In the new global economy, a region’s
ability to develop, attract, and retain a
well educated and skilled workforce is
a key factor in our nation’s economic
competitiveness. A region may possess
a strong infrastructure and the
investment resources for success, but
without the talented men and women to
use those elements for economic
growth, they will be underutilized.
Talent can also drive infrastructure and
investment because investment capital
is smart money and will follow talent,
while infrastructure can be built to
support a growing economy.
The aging of the American workforce
will clearly impact a region’s ability to
develop, attract, and retain a well
educated and skilled workforce. As
regions respond to current and
anticipated skills shortages and, in some
industries and occupations, to labor
shortages, they often overlook a key
asset—the mature workforce. Older
workers are an experienced and highly
skilled pool of labor that can help
regions meet their competitive needs.
2. Aging of the American Workforce
The United States is in the throes of
a demographic metamorphosis.
Currently, 12.4 percent of the U.S.
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77841-77844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30140]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Bureau of International Labor Affairs; Request for Information on
Efforts by Certain Countries To Eliminate the Worst Forms of Child
Labor
AGENCY: The Bureau of International Labor Affairs, United States
Department of Labor.
[[Page 77842]]
ACTION: Request for information on efforts by certain countries to
eliminate the worst forms of child labor.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice is a request for information for use by the
Department of Labor (DOL) in preparation of an annual report on certain
trade beneficiary countries' implementation of international
commitments to eliminate the worst forms of child labor. This will be
the eighth such report by DOL under the Trade and Development Act of
2000 (TDA).
DATES: Submitters of information are requested to provide their
submission to the Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor and Human
Trafficking at the e-mail or physical address below by 5 p.m., January
26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: E-mail submissions should be addressed to Tina McCarter at
mccarter.tina@dol.gov. Written submissions should be addressed to Ms.
McCarter at the Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor and Human
Trafficking, Bureau of International Labor Affairs, USDOL, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S-5317, Washington, DC 20210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina McCarter or Charita Castro,
Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Office of Child Labor, Forced
Labor and Human Trafficking, at (202) 693-4843, fax: (202) 693-4830, or
via e-mail to mccarter-tina@dol.gov or castro.charita@dol.gov. DOL's
international child labor reports can be found on the Internet at
https://www.dol.gov/ILAB/media/reports/iclp/main.htm or can be obtained
from the Office of Child Labor, Forced Labor and Human Trafficking.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Trade and Development Act of 2000 [Pub.
L. 106-200] established a new eligibility criterion for receipt of
trade benefits under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP),
Caribbean Basin Trade and Partnership Act (CBTPA), and Africa Growth
and Opportunity Act (AGOA). The TDA amends the GSP reporting
requirements of the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 504) [19 U.S.C. 2464] to
require that the President's annual report on the status of
internationally recognized worker rights include ``findings by the
Secretary of Labor with respect to the beneficiary country's
implementation of its international commitments to eliminate the worst
forms of child labor.'' Title II of the TDA and the TDA Conference
Report [Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference,
106th Cong.2d.sess. (2000)] indicate that the same criterion applies
for the receipt of benefits under CBTPA and AGOA, respectively.
In addition, the Andean Trade Preference Act (ATPA), as amended and
expanded by the Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act
(ATPDEA) [Pub. L. 107-210, Title XXXI], includes as a criterion for
receiving benefits ``[w]hether the country has implemented its
commitments to eliminate the worst forms of child labor as defined in
section 507(6) of the Trade Act of 1974.''
Scope of Report
Countries and non-independent countries and territories presently
eligible under the GSP and to be included in the report are:
Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Anguilla, Argentina, Armenia,
Bangladesh, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Botswana, Brazil, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin
Islands, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central
African Republic, Chad, Christmas Island, Cocos Islands, Colombia,
Comoros, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of Congo, Cook
Islands, Costa Rica, Cote d'Ivoire, Croatia, Djibouti, Dominica, East
Timor, Ecuador, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Falkland
Islands, Fiji, Gabon, the Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Gibraltar, Grenada,
Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Heard Island and MacDonald
Islands, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya,
Kiribati, Kyrgyz Republic, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Macedonia,
Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Moldova, Mongolia,
Montenegro, Montserrat, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Nigeria,
Niue, Norfolk Island, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea,
Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Pitcairn Islands, Russia, Rwanda, Saint
Helena, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the
Grenadines, Samoa, Sao Tom[eacute] and Principe, Senegal, Serbia,
Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, Sri
Lanka, Suriname, Swaziland, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tokelau Island,
Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turks and Caicos Islands,
Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela,
Wallis and Futuna, West Bank and Gaza Strip, Western Sahara, Republic
of Yemen, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
Countries eligible or potentially eligible for additional benefits
under the AGOA and to be included in the report are: Angola, Benin,
Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Chad, Comoros,
Republic of Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti,
Ethiopia, Gabon, the Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Kenya,
Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius,
Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe,
Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania,
Togo, Uganda, and Zambia.
Countries potentially eligible for additional benefits under the
CBTPA and to be included in the report are: Barbados, Belize, Costa
Rica, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Panama, Saint Lucia, and Trinidad and
Tobago.
Countries potentially eligible for additional benefits under the
ATPA/ATPDEA and to be included in the report are: Bolivia, Colombia,
Ecuador, and Peru.
In addition, the following countries will be included in the report
as required by the Department of Labor Appropriations, 2006, Conference
Report, H.R. Rep. 109-337 (2005): Bahrain, Chile, Dominican Republic,
El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Morocco, and Nicaragua.
Information Sought
The Department invites interested parties to submit information
relevant to the findings to be made by DOL under the TDA for all listed
countries. Information provided through public submission will be
considered by DOL in preparing its findings. Materials submitted should
be confined to the specific topic of the study. In particular, DOL's
Bureau of International Labor Affairs is seeking submissions on the
following topics:
1. Whether the country has adequate laws and regulations
proscribing the worst forms of child labor. Specifically, DOL is
seeking the following information:
(a) What laws have been promulgated on child labor? What is the
country's minimum age for admission to work? Are there exceptions to
the minimum age law? What is the minimum age for admission to hazardous
work, and what additional provisions have been enacted regarding
children's involvement in hazardous work?
(b) What laws have been promulgated on the worst forms of child
labor, such as forced child labor and trafficking or child prostitution
and pornography? Please specify what worst forms of child labor are
prohibited and describe penalties for violations. What is the minimum
age for military recruitment and/or involvement in armed conflict?
(c) If the country has ratified International Labor Organization
(ILO) Convention 182, has it developed a list of occupations considered
to be worst
[[Page 77843]]
forms of child labor, as called for in article 4 of the Convention?
2. Whether the country has adequate laws and regulations as well as
formal institutional mechanisms for the implementation and enforcement
of such laws and regulations; specifically:
(a) What legal remedies are available to government agencies that
enforce child labor and worst forms of child labor laws (civil fines,
criminal penalties, court orders, etc.), and are they adequate to deter
violations?
(b) To what extent are violations investigated and addressed?
(c) What level of resources does the government devote to
investigating child labor and worst forms of child labor cases? How
many inspectors does the government employ to address child labor? How
many police or other law enforcement officials address worst forms of
child labor issues? How many child labor investigations have been
conducted over the past year and how many have resulted in fines,
penalties, or convictions? How many investigations into worst forms of
child labor violations have been conducted over the past year and how
many have resulted in prosecutions and convictions?
(d) Has the government provided training activities for officials
charged with enforcing child labor or worst forms of child labor laws?
3. Whether social programs exist in the country to prevent the
engagement of children in the worst forms of child labor, and to assist
in the removal of children engaged in the worst forms of child labor;
specifically:
(a) What initiatives has the government supported specifically to
prevent or withdraw children from exploitive work situations, such as
school scholarships conditioned on a child's withdrawal from child
labor? (If possible, please provide information on funding levels for
such initiatives.)
4. Whether the country has a comprehensive policy for the
elimination of the worst forms of child labor; specifically:
(a) Does the country have a comprehensive policy or national
program of action on child labor or any of its forms?
(b) Does the country specifically incorporate child labor in
poverty reduction, development, educational or other social policies or
programs, such as Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers, etc.? If so, to
what degree has the country implemented the policy and/or program of
action and achieved its goals and objectives?
(c) Is education free in law and in practice? Is education
compulsory in law and in practice?
Please note that although many anti-poverty programs may have
indirect impacts on child labor, the TDA calls for governments to take
specific actions to address the problem. Therefore, the DOL's report
focuses, and information is requested on, efforts that name child labor
as an explicit objective, target group, or condition for participation
in government policies and programs.
5. Whether the country is making continual progress toward
eliminating the worst forms of child labor; specifically:
(a) In what sectors/work activities/goods do children work and how
has this changed over the past year? Information on age and gender of
working children, disaggregated by industry/work activity/good, is
appreciated.
Please note that in order to provide comparable statistics on child
work and education across countries in the TDA report, DOL relies on
the Understanding Children's Work Project (see https://www.ucw-
project.org/) and UNESCO Institute of Statistics data (https://
stats.uis.unesco.org/); therefore, such data is NOT being requested in
this Notice.
(b) To what extent are children working in slavery or practices
similar to slavery, such as debt bondage, serfdom, and forced or
compulsory labor? Please indicate industries where this occurs and, if
applicable, specific goods that such children produce.
(c) To what extent are children trafficked to work? Are children
trafficked for commercial sex or for labor exploitation? Information on
the industries into which children are trafficked and the goods that
they produce in this situation is appreciated. Are they trafficked
across national borders or within the country (specify source,
destination and transit countries/regions/communities, if possible).
DOL greatly appreciates submission of original sources. Information
submitted may include reports, newspaper articles, or other materials.
Governments that have ratified ILO Convention 182 are requested to
submit copies of their most recent article 22 submissions under the
Convention, especially those with information on types of work
determined in accordance with article 4 of the Convention. Copies of
any recent government child labor surveys or data sets are also
particularly appreciated.
Definition of Worst Forms of Child Labor
The term ``worst forms of child labor'' is defined in section
412(b) of the TDA as comprising:
``(A) all forms of slavery or practices similar to slavery, such as
the sale and trafficking of children, debt bondage and serfdom and
forced or compulsory labor, including forced or compulsory recruitment
of children for use in armed conflict;
(B) the use, procuring or offering of a child for prostitution, for
the production of pornography or for pornographic performances;
(C) the use, procuring or offering of a child for illicit
activities, in particular for the production and trafficking of drugs
as defined in relevant international treaties; and
(D) work which, by its nature or the circumstances in which it is
carried out, is likely to harm the health, safety or morals of
children.''
The TDA Conference Report noted that the phrase, ``work which, by
its nature or the circumstances in which it is carried out, is likely
to harm the health, safety or morals of children,'' is to be defined as
in article II of Recommendation No. 190, which accompanies ILO
Convention 182. This includes:
``(a) Work which exposes children to physical, psychological, or
sexual abuse;
(b) Work underground, under water, at dangerous heights or in
confined spaces;
(c) Work with dangerous machinery, equipment and tools, or which
involves the manual handling or transport of heavy loads;
(d) Work in an unhealthy environment which may, for example, expose
children to hazardous substances, agents or processes, or to
temperatures, noise levels, or vibrations damaging to their health;
(e) Work under particularly difficult conditions such as work for
long hours or during the night or work where the child is unreasonably
confined to the premises of the employer.''
The TDA Conference Report further indicated that this phrase be
interpreted in a manner consistent with the intent of article 4 of ILO
Convention 182, which states that such work shall be determined by
national laws or regulations or by the competent authority in the
country involved. In addition, the TDA Conference report indicated that
the phrase generally not apply to situations in which children work for
their parents on bona fide family farms or holdings.
[[Page 77844]]
This notice is a general solicitation of comments from the public.
Marcia Eugenio,
Acting Associate Deputy Under Secretary, International Labor Affairs
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E8-30140 Filed 12-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-P