Ford Motor Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 77874-77876 [E8-30132]
Download as PDF
77874
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
the control of ATD and 1,384 have been
sold to consumers.
Paragraph S6.5(d) of 49 CFR 571.119
requires in pertinent part:
S6.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in
this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on
each sidewall with the information specified
in paragraphs (a) through (j) of this section.
The markings shall be placed between the
maximum section width (exclusive of
sidewall decorations or curb ribs) and the
bead on at least one sidewall, unless the
maximum section width of the tire is located
in an area which is not more than one-fourth
of the distance from the bead to the shoulder
of the tire. If the maximum section width
falls within that area, the markings shall
appear between the bead and a point one-half
the distance from the bead to the shoulder of
the tire, on at least one sidewall. The
markings shall be in letters and numerals not
less than 2 mm (0.078 inch) high and raised
above or sunk below the tire surface not less
that 0.4 mm (0.015 inch), except that the
marking depth shall be not less than 0.25mm
(0.010 inch) in the case of motorcycle tires.
The tire identification and the DOT symbol
labeling shall comply with part 574 of this
chapter. Markings may appear on only one
sidewall and the entire sidewall area may be
used in the case of motorcycle tires and
recreational, boat, baggage, and special trailer
tires* * *
(d) The maximum load rating and
corresponding inflation pressure of the tire,
shown as follows:
(Mark on tires rated for single and dual
load): Max load single ll kg (ll lb) at
ll kPa (ll psi) cold. Max load dual ll
kg (ll lb) at ll kPa (ll psi) cold.
(Mark on tires rated only for single load):
Max load ll kg (l lb) at ll kPa
(ll psi) cold.
CMA explained that the subject tires
are marketed with the correct maximum
load rating and corresponding inflation
pressure in both English and Metric
units. The affected tires have English
units on one sidewall and Metric units
on the other sidewall. The
noncompliance being that both English
and Metric units do not both appear on
each sidewall.
CMA stated that it believes the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety because correct
maximum load rating and
corresponding inflation pressure
information is marked on each tire in
both English and Metric units.
Therefore, that information is readily
available to anyone who uses the tires.
CMA requested that NHTSA consider
its petition and grant an exemption from
the recall requirements of the National
Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act on
relieve ATD as distributer of the prohibitions on the
sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of the
noncompliant tires currently under its control.
Those tires must be brought into conformance,
exported, or destroyed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
the basis that the noncompliance
described above is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments on this petition. Comments
must refer to the docket and notice
number cited at the beginning of this
notice and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
a. By mail addressed to: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
b. By hand delivery to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590. The Docket Section is open
on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except Federal Holidays.
c. Electronically: By logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to 1–202–
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following
the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
PO 00000
Frm 00284
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
Comment closing date: January 20,
2009.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8.
Issued on: December 15, 2008.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E8–30136 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0183; Notice 1]
Ford Motor Company, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Ford Motor Company (Ford) has
determined that certain complete model
year 2007–2008 Ford Expedition and
Lincoln Navigator multipurpose
passenger vehicles (MPV) built with the
Limousine Builders Package and certain
complete 2008 model year Ford Crown
Victoria Police Interceptor (CVPI)
passenger cars built with two front
bucket seats did not fully comply with
paragraph S4.3(b) of 49 CFR 571.110,
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 110 Tire Selection and
Rims for Motor Vehicles With a GVWR
of 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) or
Less. Ford has filed an appropriate
report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), Ford has petitioned for
an exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Ford’s,
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
Affected are approximately 233 model
year 2007–2008 Ford Expedition and
Lincoln Navigator MPVs with the
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
Limousine Builders Package (built from
September 6, 2006 through March 12,
2008 at Ford’s Michigan Truck Plant)
and approximately 34,682 model year
2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police
Interceptor passenger cars equipped
with two front bucket seats (built from
June 27, 2007 through May 7, 2008 at
Ford’s St. Thomas Assembly Plant).
Paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110
requires in pertinent part:
S4.3 Placard. Each vehicle, except for a
trailer or incomplete vehicle, shall show the
information specified in S4.3 (a) through (g),
and may show, at the manufacturer’s option,
the information specified in S4.3 (h) and (i),
on a placard permanently affixed to the
driver’s side B-pillar. In each vehicle without
a driver’s side B-pillar and with two doors on
the driver’s side of the vehicle opening in
opposite directions, the placard shall be
affixed on the forward edge of the rear side
door. If the above locations do not permit the
affixing of a placard that is legible, visible
and prominent, the placard shall be
permanently affixed to the rear edge of the
driver’s side door. If this location does not
permit the affixing of a placard that is legible,
visible and prominent, the placard shall be
affixed to the inward facing surface of the
vehicle next to the driver’s seating position.
This information shall be in the English
language and conform in color and format,
not including the border surrounding the
entire placard, as shown in the example set
forth in Figure 1 in this standard. At the
manufacturer’s option, the information
specified in S4.3 (c), (d), and, as appropriate,
(h) and (i) may be shown, alternatively to
being shown on the placard, on a tire
inflation pressure label which must conform
in color and format, not including the border
surrounding the entire label, as shown in the
example set forth in Figure 2 in this standard.
The label shall be permanently affixed and
proximate to the placard required by this
paragraph. The information specified in S4.3
(e) shall be shown on both the vehicle
placard and on the tire inflation pressure
label (if such a label is affixed to provide the
information specified in S4.3 (c), (d), and, as
appropriate, (h) and (i)) may be shown in the
format and color scheme set forth in Figures
1 and 2 * * *
(b) Designated seated capacity (expressed
in terms of total number of occupants and
number of occupants for each front and rear
seat location) * * *
In its petition, Ford explained that the
noncompliances with FMVSS No. 110
exist due to errors on the tire and
loading information placards that it
affixed to the vehicles. Ford described
the noncompliances as incorrect listing
of designated seating positions on the
tire and loading information placard.
Specifically:
1. Expedition and Navigator vehicles
with the Limo Builders Package are
built with only two front seats. No rear
seats are installed. The tire information
placard identifies the seating capacity as
five total (two front; three rear) or seven
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
total (two front; five rear), instead of two
total (two front; zero rear).
2. CVPI passenger cars with two front
bucket seats—the designated seating
capacity was incorrectly identified as
six total (three front; three rear) instead
of five total (two front; three rear).
Ford also explained its belief that in
each of these cases the number of seats
and the number of safety belts installed
in the vehicle will clearly indicate to the
customers the actual seating capacity.
Ford also declared its belief that NHTSA
has reached a similar conclusion that
the presence of seat belts will alert the
operators to the number of seating
positions in any row of seating. Ford
specifically details its reasoning as
follows:
In the case of the Expedition and Navigator
vehicles built with the Limo Builders
Package are equipped with only two front
seats and two sets of safety belts when
delivered to the Qualified Vehicle Modifier
(QVM). When the QVM completes the
modifications to the vehicles, the final
number of seating positions will be specified
on the label required to be affixed by the
QVM.
In the case of the CVPI vehicles that are
equipped with front bucket seats, the seats
are separated by approximately 11 inches
and Ford believes that nearly all of these
vehicles will have a center console (typically
used to mount police equipment such as lap
top computers, communications radios, siren
and lighting controls, etc.) installed by the
aftermarket upfitters who perform police
vehicle conversions.
Ford stated that in all cases, the
weight capacity, the tire size
designation and the cold tire inflation
pressure data listed on the tire and
loading information placard is correct
for the vehicles on which they are
installed. Ford additionally stated that
because the weight capacity is accurate,
it believes that there is no potential for
vehicle overloading due to the incorrect
value in the designated seating capacity.
Ford also stated that it was not aware
of any field or owner complaints of
misunderstanding of the actual number
of seats in these vehicles.
Ford also has informed NHTSA that it
has corrected the problem that caused
these errors so that they will not be
repeated in future production.
In summation, Ford states that it
believes that the noncompliances are
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety
and that no corrective action is
warranted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
PO 00000
Frm 00285
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77875
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments on this petition. Comments
must refer to the docket and notice
number cited at the beginning of this
notice and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
a. By mail addressed to: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
b. By hand delivery to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590. The Docket Section is open
on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except Federal Holidays.
c. Electronically: by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to 1–202–
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement is in
the Federal Register published on April
11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
You may view documents submitted
to a docket at the address and times
given above. You may also view the
documents on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets available at that Web site.
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
77876
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 245 / Friday, December 19, 2008 / Notices
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
Comment closing date: January 20,
2009.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at CFR 1.50 and
501.8.
Issued on: December 15, 2008.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E8–30132 Filed 12–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0210; Notice 1]
Newell Coach Corporation, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Newell Coach Corporation (Newell),
has determined that certain motor
homes that it manufactured between
June 17, 1996 and August 26, 2008 do
not fully comply with paragraph S5.3 of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 120 Tire Selection and
Rims for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR
of More than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000
pounds). Newell has filed an
appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), Newell has petitioned for
an exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Newell’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
Affected are approximately 456 motor
homes manufactured by Newell
between June 17, 1996 and August 26,
2008.
Paragraphs S5.3 of FMVSS No. 120
requires in pertinent part:
S5.3 Each vehicle shall show the
information specified in S5.3.1 and S5.3.2
and, in the case of a vehicle equipped with
a non-pneumatic spare tire, the information
specified in S5.3.3, in the English language,
lettered in block capitals and numerals not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
less than 2.4 millimeters high and in the
format set forth following this paragraph.
This information shall appear either—
(a) After each GAWR listed on the
certification label required by Sec. 567.4 or
Sec. 567.5 of this chapter; or at the option of
the manufacturer,
(b) On the tire information label affixed to
the vehicle in the manner, location, and form
described in Sec. 567.4 (b) through (f) of this
chapter as appropriate of each GVWR–GAWR
combination listed on the certification label.
S5.3.1 Tires. The size designation (not
necessarily for the tires on the vehicle) and
the recommended cold inflation pressure for
those tires such that the sum of the load
ratings of the tires on each axle (when the
tires’ load carrying capacity at the specified
pressure is reduced by dividing by 1.10, in
the case of a tire subject to FMVSS No. 109)
is appropriate for the GAWR as calculated in
accordance with S5.1.2.
S5.3.2. Rims. The size designation and, if
applicable, the type designation of Rims (not
necessarily those on the vehicle) appropriate
for those tires.
Truck Example—Suitable Tire-Rim Choice
GVWR: 7,840 KG (17,289 LB)
GAWR: FRONT—2,850 KG (6,280 LB) WITH
7.50–20(D) TIRES, 20x6.00 RIMS AT 520
KPA (75 PSI) COLD SINGLE
GAWR: REAR—4,990 KG (11,000 LB) WITH
7.50–20(D) TIRES, 20x6.00 RIMS, AT 450
KPA (65 PSI) COLD DUAL
GVWR: 13,280 KG (29,279 LB)
GAWR: FRONT—4,826 KG (10,640 LB)
WITH 10.00–20(F) TIRES, 20x7.50 RIMS,
AT 620 KPA (90 PSI) COLD SINGLE
GAWR: REAR—8,454 KG (18,639 LB) WITH
10.00–20(F) TIRES, 20x2.70 RIMS, AT 550
KPA (80 PSI) COLD DUAL* * *
Newell explains that the
noncompliance is that the tire and rim
information lettering on the vehicles’
certification labeling is only 1.8
millimeters high, as opposed to the 2.4
millimeter height required under
paragraph S5.3 of FMVSS No. 120.
Newell stated that it discovered the
noncompliance after investigating an
inquiry from National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA)
concerning readability of the tire and
rim information on the vehicles’
certification labels.
Newell argues that while the required
tire and rim information lettering is only
0.6 mm (about 1/45 of an inch) shorter
than the 2.4 mm height required by the
standard that it creates no risk to motor
vehicle safety. Newell believes that all
of the relevant information is set forth
on the certification label, and that it is
easily readable.
Newell further states that for vehicles
manufactured from 2002 through 2008,
if an operator has difficulty reading the
information on the label, the tire
inflation information is available in the
owner’s manuals provided with the
vehicles.
PO 00000
Frm 00286
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Newell additionally stated that it has
provided tire inflation information in
the Newell’s News, a newsletter that
Newell sends to its customers. Newell
also points out that the rim size and
type are marked on the wheels of the
vehicle, and the tire designation is
marked on the tires themselves, thus
providing a further source for most of
the information required by the
standard.
Newell also believes that NHTSA has
previously granted at least one petition
for inconsequential noncompliance
where the facts were almost identical to
those stated in this petition. Moreover,
Newell believes that on numerous
occasions NHTSA has granted petitions
for inconsequential noncompliance
where there has been a complete
omission of required tire and/or rim
information on the certification label.
Finally, Newell notes that these
vehicles have been on the road for up
to 12 years, and the company has not
received any consumer complaints
regarding an inability to read the tire
and rim information on the certification
label.
Newell also stated that it has
corrected the problem that caused these
errors so that they will not be repeated
in future production.
In summation, Newell states that it
believes that because the
noncompliances are inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety that no corrective
action is warranted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore,
these provisions only apply to vehicles
and equipment that have already passed
from the manufacturer to an owner,
purchaser, or dealer.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments on this petition. Comments
must refer to the docket and notice
number cited at the beginning of this
notice and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
a. By mail addressed to: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
b. By hand delivery to U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 245 (Friday, December 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77874-77876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30132]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2008-0183; Notice 1]
Ford Motor Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
Ford Motor Company (Ford) has determined that certain complete
model year 2007-2008 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator multipurpose
passenger vehicles (MPV) built with the Limousine Builders Package and
certain complete 2008 model year Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor
(CVPI) passenger cars built with two front bucket seats did not fully
comply with paragraph S4.3(b) of 49 CFR 571.110, Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims for Motor
Vehicles With a GVWR of 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less. Ford
has filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see implementing rule
at 49 CFR part 556), Ford has petitioned for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
This notice of receipt of Ford's, petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
Affected are approximately 233 model year 2007-2008 Ford Expedition
and Lincoln Navigator MPVs with the
[[Page 77875]]
Limousine Builders Package (built from September 6, 2006 through March
12, 2008 at Ford's Michigan Truck Plant) and approximately 34,682 model
year 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor passenger cars
equipped with two front bucket seats (built from June 27, 2007 through
May 7, 2008 at Ford's St. Thomas Assembly Plant).
Paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110 requires in pertinent part:
S4.3 Placard. Each vehicle, except for a trailer or incomplete
vehicle, shall show the information specified in S4.3 (a) through
(g), and may show, at the manufacturer's option, the information
specified in S4.3 (h) and (i), on a placard permanently affixed to
the driver's side B-pillar. In each vehicle without a driver's side
B-pillar and with two doors on the driver's side of the vehicle
opening in opposite directions, the placard shall be affixed on the
forward edge of the rear side door. If the above locations do not
permit the affixing of a placard that is legible, visible and
prominent, the placard shall be permanently affixed to the rear edge
of the driver's side door. If this location does not permit the
affixing of a placard that is legible, visible and prominent, the
placard shall be affixed to the inward facing surface of the vehicle
next to the driver's seating position. This information shall be in
the English language and conform in color and format, not including
the border surrounding the entire placard, as shown in the example
set forth in Figure 1 in this standard. At the manufacturer's
option, the information specified in S4.3 (c), (d), and, as
appropriate, (h) and (i) may be shown, alternatively to being shown
on the placard, on a tire inflation pressure label which must
conform in color and format, not including the border surrounding
the entire label, as shown in the example set forth in Figure 2 in
this standard. The label shall be permanently affixed and proximate
to the placard required by this paragraph. The information specified
in S4.3 (e) shall be shown on both the vehicle placard and on the
tire inflation pressure label (if such a label is affixed to provide
the information specified in S4.3 (c), (d), and, as appropriate, (h)
and (i)) may be shown in the format and color scheme set forth in
Figures 1 and 2 * * *
(b) Designated seated capacity (expressed in terms of total
number of occupants and number of occupants for each front and rear
seat location) * * *
In its petition, Ford explained that the noncompliances with FMVSS
No. 110 exist due to errors on the tire and loading information
placards that it affixed to the vehicles. Ford described the
noncompliances as incorrect listing of designated seating positions on
the tire and loading information placard. Specifically:
1. Expedition and Navigator vehicles with the Limo Builders Package
are built with only two front seats. No rear seats are installed. The
tire information placard identifies the seating capacity as five total
(two front; three rear) or seven total (two front; five rear), instead
of two total (two front; zero rear).
2. CVPI passenger cars with two front bucket seats--the designated
seating capacity was incorrectly identified as six total (three front;
three rear) instead of five total (two front; three rear).
Ford also explained its belief that in each of these cases the
number of seats and the number of safety belts installed in the vehicle
will clearly indicate to the customers the actual seating capacity.
Ford also declared its belief that NHTSA has reached a similar
conclusion that the presence of seat belts will alert the operators to
the number of seating positions in any row of seating. Ford
specifically details its reasoning as follows:
In the case of the Expedition and Navigator vehicles built with
the Limo Builders Package are equipped with only two front seats and
two sets of safety belts when delivered to the Qualified Vehicle
Modifier (QVM). When the QVM completes the modifications to the
vehicles, the final number of seating positions will be specified on
the label required to be affixed by the QVM.
In the case of the CVPI vehicles that are equipped with front
bucket seats, the seats are separated by approximately 11 inches and
Ford believes that nearly all of these vehicles will have a center
console (typically used to mount police equipment such as lap top
computers, communications radios, siren and lighting controls, etc.)
installed by the aftermarket upfitters who perform police vehicle
conversions.
Ford stated that in all cases, the weight capacity, the tire size
designation and the cold tire inflation pressure data listed on the
tire and loading information placard is correct for the vehicles on
which they are installed. Ford additionally stated that because the
weight capacity is accurate, it believes that there is no potential for
vehicle overloading due to the incorrect value in the designated
seating capacity.
Ford also stated that it was not aware of any field or owner
complaints of misunderstanding of the actual number of seats in these
vehicles.
Ford also has informed NHTSA that it has corrected the problem that
caused these errors so that they will not be repeated in future
production.
In summation, Ford states that it believes that the noncompliances
are inconsequential to motor vehicle safety and that no corrective
action is warranted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance.
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be submitted by
any of the following methods:
a. By mail addressed to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
b. By hand delivery to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on
weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
c. Electronically: by logging onto the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the
online instructions for submitting comments. Comments may also be faxed
to 1-202-493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement is in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477-78).
You may view documents submitted to a docket at the address and
times given above. You may also view the documents on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets available at that Web site.
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and
[[Page 77876]]
supporting materials received after the closing date will also be filed
and will be considered to the extent possible. When the petition is
granted or denied, notice of the decision will be published in the
Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
Comment closing date: January 20, 2009.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
Issued on: December 15, 2008.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. E8-30132 Filed 12-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P