Brake Rotors From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77004-77005 [E8-30111]
Download as PDF
77004
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
industry, trade groups, consumer
interest groups, health professionals,
and other individuals who have asked
to be included. The Update is also
available on the FSIS Web page.
Through the Listserv and Web page,
FSIS is able to provide information to a
much broader and more diverse
audience. In addition, FSIS offers an
e-mail subscription service which
provides automatic and customized
access to selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/news_and_
events/email_subscription/. Options
range from recalls to export information
to regulations, directives and notices.
Customers can add or delete
subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password protect their
accounts.
Done at Washington, DC on December 12,
2008.
Paulo Almeida,
Associate U.S. Manager for Codex
Alimentarius.
[FR Doc. E8–30004 Filed 12–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
Notice of Petitions by Firms for
Determination of Eligibility To Apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance
AGENCY: Economic Development
Administration, Department of
Commerce
ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for
Public Comment.
Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade
Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2341 et seq.), the
Economic Development Administration
(EDA) has received petitions for
certification of eligibility to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance from the
firms listed below. EDA has initiated
separate investigations to determine
whether increased imports into the
United States of articles like or directly
competitive with those produced by
each firm contributed importantly to the
total or partial separation of the firm’s
workers, or threat thereof, and to a
decrease in sales or production of each
petitioning firm.
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION OF ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT 10/30/
2008 THROUGH 12/11/2008
Date accepted for
filing
Firm
Address
Iceberg Enterprises, LLC ..........................
1300 W. Higgins Road, Park Ridge, IL
60068.
435 Weber Avenue, Compton, CA ...........
10/30/2008
5653 Stoneridge Drive, Pleasanton, CA
94588–90223.
718 Burma Road, Banner Elk, NC 28604
12/11/2008
Thorock Metals, Inc. .................................
TechniQuip Corp. ......................................
Misty Mountain Threadworks, Inc. ............
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Any party having a substantial
interest in these proceedings may
request a public hearing on the matter.
A written request for a hearing must be
submitted to the Office of Performance
Evaluation, Room 7009, Economic
Development Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Washington,
DC 20230, no later than ten (10)
calendar days following publication of
this notice. Please follow the procedures
set forth in Section 315.9 of EDA’s final
rule (71 FR 56704) for procedures for
requesting a public hearing. The Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance official
program number and title of the
program under which these petitions are
submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
Dated: December 12, 2008.
William P. Kittredge,
Program Officer for TAA.
[FR Doc. E8–30039 Filed 12–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Dec 17, 2008
12/9/2008
12/11/2008
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–846
Brake Rotors From the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Extension
of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 18, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Terre Keaton Stefanova,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;
telephone; (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–
1280, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 4, 2008, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
in the Federal Register a notice of
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Products
Plastic tables, chairs, cabinets and related office products.
Alloyed aluminum ingots (RSI, or Recycled Secondary Ingots).
Fiber optic illumination devices and fluorescent ring lights.
Recreational mountain climbing gear, including waist/body harnesses, boulder
pads, slings, chalk bags and tool bags.
initiation of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on brake
rotors from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC) covering the period April 1,
2007, through March 31, 2008. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 73 FR 31813 (June 4, 2008). On
June 25, 2008, the Department
published a notice of revocation of the
antidumping duty order on brake rotors
from the PRC effective August 14, 2007
(see Brake Rotors From the People’s
Republic of China: Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to
Second Five-year (Sunset) Review, 73
FR 36039 (June 25, 2008)). As a result
of the revocation of the order, the period
of review (POR) was changed from April
1, 2007, through March 31, 2008, to
April 1, 2007, through August 13, 2007
(see June 27, 2009 Memorandum to The
File titled ‘‘Change in the Period of
Review’’).
On July 29, 2008, we selected
Longkou Haimeng Machinery Co., Ltd
(Longkou Haimeng) and Yantai Winhere
Auto–Part Manufacturing (Yantai
Winhere) as the mandatory respondents
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
in this administrative review. See the
July 29, 2008, Memorandum from The
Team to James Maeder, Office Director,
titled ‘‘2007 Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Brake Rotors
from the People’s Republic of China:
Selection of Respondents for Individual
Review.’’
In July and August 2008, several
companies, including Longkou
Haimeng, timely withdrew their
requests for review. We partially
rescinded the review with respect to
these companies. See Brake Rotors From
the People’s Republic of China: Notice
of Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
53193 (September 15, 2008).
Extension of Time Limit of
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to make a preliminary
determination in an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of an order or
finding for which a review is requested.
If it is not practicable to complete the
review within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend this deadline to a
maximum of 365 days. The deadline for
the preliminary results of this review is
currently December 31, 2008.
In this review, the interested parties
have not submitted publicly available
information (PAI) for consideration in
valuing the factors of production in the
preliminary results. Moreover, we have
requested and received documentation
from U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) for certain entries
made by exporter/producer
combinations which are also included
in this review to determine whether
those entries are non–subject
merchandise. Therefore, the Department
requires additional time to obtain
updated PAI and analyze the entry data
from CBP. Thus, it is not practicable to
complete this review within the original
time limit. Therefore, the Department is
partially extending the time limit for
completion of the preliminary results
from 245 days to 306 days, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) the
Act. The preliminary results are now
due no later than March 2, 2009. The
final results continue to be due 120 days
after the publication of the preliminary
results.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:51 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
77005
Dated: December 11, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. E8–30111 Filed 12–17–08; 8:45 am]
and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From
Canada: Extension of Time Limit for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 73 FR 63134
(October 23, 2008).
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
Period of Review
The period of review is October 1,
2006 through September 30, 2007.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–122–840)
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod from Canada: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 10, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (Department)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada.
See Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel
Wire Rod From Canada, 73 FR 39646
(July 10, 2008) (Preliminary Results).
This review covers the period October 1,
2006, through September 30, 2007, for
Ivaco Rolling Mills 2004 L.P. and Sivaco
Ontario, a division of Sivaco Wire
Group 2004 L.P. (referred to collectively
as Ivaco).
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 18, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1131 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 10, 2008, the Department
published the preliminary results of this
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada.
See Preliminary Results, 73 FR 39646.
Ivaco submitted its case brief on August
11, 2008, and petitioners, ISG
Georgetown Inc., Gerdau Ameristeel
U.S. Inc., Nucor Steel Connecticut Inc.,
Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.,
and Rocky Mountain Steel Mills,
submitted their rebuttal brief on August
18, 2008. No hearing was requested. The
Department extended the deadline for
completion of the final results by 35
days, to December 12, 2008. See Carbon
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain hot–rolled products of carbon
steel and alloy steel, in coils, of
approximately round cross section, 5.00
mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in
solid cross-sectional diameter.
Specifically excluded are steel
products possessing the above–noted
physical characteristics and meeting the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) definitions for
(a) stainless steel; (b) tool steel; (c) high
nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and
(e) concrete reinforcing bars and rods.
Also excluded are (f) free machining
steel products (i.e., products that
contain by weight one or more of the
following elements: 0.03 percent or
more of lead, 0.05 percent or more of
bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur,
more than 0.04 percent of phosphorus,
more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or
more than 0.01 percent of tellurium).
Also excluded from the scope are
1080 grade tire cord quality wire rod
and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire
rod. Grade 1080 tire cord quality rod is
defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod measuring 5.0 mm or
more but not more than 6.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non–deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.30 mm or less with 3 or
fewer breaks per ton, and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3)
0.040 percent or less, in the aggregate,
of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006
percent or less of nitrogen, and (5) not
more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium.
Grade 1080 tire bead quality rod is
defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire bead
quality wire rod measuring 5.5 mm or
more but not more than 7.0 mm in
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 244 (Thursday, December 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77004-77005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-30111]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-570-846
Brake Rotors From the People's Republic of China: Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 18, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Terre Keaton Stefanova,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone; (202)
482-1766 or (202) 482-1280, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 4, 2008, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on brake rotors
from the People's Republic of China (PRC) covering the period April 1,
2007, through March 31, 2008. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation
in Part, 73 FR 31813 (June 4, 2008). On June 25, 2008, the Department
published a notice of revocation of the antidumping duty order on brake
rotors from the PRC effective August 14, 2007 (see Brake Rotors From
the People's Republic of China: Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order
Pursuant to Second Five-year (Sunset) Review, 73 FR 36039 (June 25,
2008)). As a result of the revocation of the order, the period of
review (POR) was changed from April 1, 2007, through March 31, 2008, to
April 1, 2007, through August 13, 2007 (see June 27, 2009 Memorandum to
The File titled ``Change in the Period of Review'').
On July 29, 2008, we selected Longkou Haimeng Machinery Co., Ltd
(Longkou Haimeng) and Yantai Winhere Auto-Part Manufacturing (Yantai
Winhere) as the mandatory respondents
[[Page 77005]]
in this administrative review. See the July 29, 2008, Memorandum from
The Team to James Maeder, Office Director, titled ``2007 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Brake Rotors from the People's Republic
of China: Selection of Respondents for Individual Review.''
In July and August 2008, several companies, including Longkou
Haimeng, timely withdrew their requests for review. We partially
rescinded the review with respect to these companies. See Brake Rotors
From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 53193 (September 15,
2008).
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination in an
administrative review within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of an order or finding for which a review is
requested. If it is not practicable to complete the review within this
time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to
extend this deadline to a maximum of 365 days. The deadline for the
preliminary results of this review is currently December 31, 2008.
In this review, the interested parties have not submitted publicly
available information (PAI) for consideration in valuing the factors of
production in the preliminary results. Moreover, we have requested and
received documentation from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
for certain entries made by exporter/producer combinations which are
also included in this review to determine whether those entries are
non-subject merchandise. Therefore, the Department requires additional
time to obtain updated PAI and analyze the entry data from CBP. Thus,
it is not practicable to complete this review within the original time
limit. Therefore, the Department is partially extending the time limit
for completion of the preliminary results from 245 days to 306 days, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) the Act. The preliminary results
are now due no later than March 2, 2009. The final results continue to
be due 120 days after the publication of the preliminary results.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).
Dated: December 11, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. E8-30111 Filed 12-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S