FTA Fiscal Year 2009 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program Information, 77344-77429 [E8-29645]
Download as PDF
77344
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2009 Apportionments,
Allocations, and Program Information
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Division A of the
Consolidated Security, Disaster
Assistance, and Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009, (Pub. L. 110–
329) signed into law by President Bush
on September 30, 2008, continues to
fund the Federal transit programs of the
Department of Transportation (DOT) at
the same levels that were available
under Division K of the ‘‘Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008’’ (Pub. L. 110–
161) until a DOT Appropriations Act for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 is enacted or
March 6, 2009, whichever occurs first.
This notice provides information on
funding amounts that are currently
available for the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) assistance
programs; provides program guidance
and requirements; and provides
information on several program issues
important in the current year. The
notice also includes tables that show
certain discretionary programs
unobligated (carryover) funding from
previous years that will be available for
obligation during FY 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information about this notice
contact Henrika Buchanan-Smith,
Director, Office of Transit Programs, at
(202) 366–2053. Please contact the
appropriate FTA regional office for any
specific requests for information or
technical assistance. The Appendix at
the end of this notice includes contact
information for FTA regional offices. An
FTA headquarters contact for each
major program area is also included in
the discussion of that program in the
text of the notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. FY 2009 Available Funding for FTA
Programs
A. Available Funding Based on Division A
of the Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, and Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU)
B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Oversight
III. FY 2009 FTA Key Program Initiatives and
Changes
A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant
Opportunities
D. Flexible Funding Procedures
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
E. Changes in Match for Biodiesel Vehicles
and Hybrid Retrofits
F. National Transit Database (NTD)
Disaster Adjustments Policy
IV. FTA PROGRAMS
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305)
B. Statewide Planning and Research
Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5307)
D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C.
5308)
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—Fixed Guideway Modernization
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—Bus and Bus-Related Facilities
G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C.
5309)—New Starts
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals
and Individuals With Disabilities
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5311)
J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3))
K. Public Transportation on Indian
Reservation Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(c))
L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C.
5314)
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
O. Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks
Program (49 U.S.C. 5320)
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339)
Q. Growing States and High Density States
Formula (49 U.S.C. 5340)
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note)
V. FTA Policy And Procedures for FY 2009
Grants Requirements
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority To
Incur Project Costs
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
C. FTA FY 2009 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
E. Grant Application Procedures
F. Payments
G. Oversight
H. Technical Assistance
TABLES
1. FTA FY 2009 APPROPRIATIONS AND
APPORTIONMENTS FOR GRANT
PROGRAMS
2. FTA FY 2009 METROPOLITAN
PLANNING PROGRAM AND
STATEWIDE PLANNING AND
RESEARCH PROGRAM
APPORTIONMENTS
3. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5307 AND
SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA
APPORTIONMENTS
4. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5307
APPORTIONMENT FORMULA
5. FTA FY 2009 FORMULA PROGRAMS
APPORTIONMENTS DATA UNIT
VALUES
6. FTA FY 2009 SMALL TRANSIT
INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE
DATA AND APPORTIONMENTS
7. FTA PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED
SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS
ALLOCATIONS
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
8. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5309 FIXED
GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION
APPORTIONMENTS
9. FTA FY 2009 FIXED GUIDEWAY
MODERNIZATION PROGRAM
APPORTIONMENT FORMULA
10. FTA PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED
SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUSRELATED FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS
11. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5309 NEW
STARTS ALLOCATIONS
12. FTA PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED
SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS
ALLOCATIONS
13. FTA FY 2009 SPECIAL NEEDS FOR
ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES
APPORTIONMENTS
14. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5311 AND
SECTION 5340 NONURBANIZED AREA
FORMULA APPORTIONMENTS, AND
RURAL TRANSPORTATION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RTAP)
ALLOCATIONS
15. FTA PRIOR UNOBLIGATED TRIBAL
TRANSIT DISCRETIONARY
ALLOCATIONS
16. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5316 JOB
ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE
(JARC) APPORTIONMENTS
17. FTA PRIOR UNOBLIGATED
DISCRETIONARY JARC ALLOCATIONS
18. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5317 NEW
FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS
19. FTA PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED
SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVE
ANALYSIS ALLOCATIONS
APPENDIX
I. Overview
This document apportions or allocates
the FY 2009 funds that were made
available under Division A of the
Consolidated Security, Disaster
Assistance, and Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009, (Pub. L. 110–
329, September 30, 2008), hereinafter,
(‘‘Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009’’) among potential program
recipients according to statutory
formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 and
existing Full Funding Grant
Agreements. The notice only includes
the amount of FY 2009 funds that is
currently available, which is
approximately 5⁄12 or 43% of the
amounts that were available under the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008.
The notice does not include any
extension or reprogramming of any
discretionary funds that lapsed to the
designated project as of September 30,
2008. The notice also does not include
partial amounts made available to
projects designated Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities Program funds or National
Research Program funds under
SAFETEA–LU. FTA will issue a
supplemental notice at a later date
regarding these projects and any
additional increments of formula and
discretionary funds that become
available.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
For each FTA program included in
this notice, we have provided relevant
information on the FY 2009 funding
currently available, program
requirements, period of availability, and
other related program information and
highlights, as appropriate. A separate
section of the document provides
information on program requirements
and guidance that are applicable to all
FTA programs.
II. FY 2009 Funding for FTA Programs
A. Funding Based on the Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 110–
329, September 30, 2008) and
SAFETEA–LU Authorization
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides general funds and
obligation authority on trust funds from
the MTA that total $4.1 billion for FTA
programs, until a DOT Appropriations
Act for FY 2009 is enacted or a
continued continuing Resolution after
March 6, 2009, whichever occurs first.
Table 1 of this document shows the
funding for the FTA programs, as
provided for in the Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009. All Formula
Programs and the Section 5309 Bus and
Bus-Related Facilities Program are
funded entirely from MTA of the
Highway Trust Fund in FY 2009. The
Section 5309 New Starts Program, the
Research Program, and FTA
administrative expenses are funded by
appropriations from the General Fund of
the Treasury.
Congress has enacted a partial year
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009.
This Federal Register notice includes
tables of apportionments and allocations
for FTA formula programs based on that
Act. Prorated allocations based on FY
2008 funding levels are also included
for active Full Funding Grant
Agreements (FFGAs) under the New
Starts discretionary program; however,
FY 2009 discretionary allocations for
other discretionary programs will not be
published until FTA issues a
subsequent notice as additional
resources are made available.
evaluations and analyses of grantee
specific problems and issues; and to
provide technical assistance to correct
deficiencies identified in compliance
reviews and audits.
Section 5327 of title 49 U.S.C.,
authorizes the takedown of funds from
FTA programs for project management
oversight. Section 5327 provides
oversight takedowns at the following
levels: 0.5 percent of Planning funds,
0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula
funds, 1 percent of Capital Investment
funds, 0.5 percent of Special Needs of
Elderly Individuals and Individuals
with Disabilities formula funds, 0.5
percent of Nonurbanized Area Formula
funds, and 0.5 percent of the Paul S.
Sarbanes Transit in the Parks Program
funds (formerly the Alternative
Transportation in the Parks and Public
Lands Program).
III. FY 2009 FTA Program Initiatives
and Changes
A. SAFETEA–LU Implementation
In FY 2009, FTA continues to focus
on implementation of SAFETEA–LU
through issuance of new and revised
program guidance and regulations.
Before any documents that place
binding obligations on grantees are
finalized and issued, FTA makes them
available for public comment. We
encourage grantees to regularly check
the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov and the U.S.
Government docket management
Website at https://regulations.gov for
new issuances and to comment to the
docket established for each document
on relevant issues.
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
In recognition of the priority planning
organizations and grantees are giving to
the implementation of the new and
changed provisions of SAFETEA–LU,
FTA and the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) are not issuing
new planning emphasis areas for FY
2009, and have rescinded planning
emphasis areas from prior years.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project
Management Oversight
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant
Opportunities
FTA uses a percentage of funds
appropriated to certain FTA programs
for program oversight activities
conducted by the agency. The funds are
used to provide necessary oversight
activities, including oversight of the
construction of any major capital project
under these statutory programs; to
conduct safety and security, civil rights,
procurement systems, management,
planning certification and, financial
reviews and audits, as well as
SAFETEA–LU contained statutory
earmarks under several programs.
Absent future legislation to the contrary,
FTA will honor the statutory earmarks;
however, funds for the FY 2009
discretionary programs with the
exception of New Start Program funds
for existing FFGAs will not be made
available in partial increments. FTA
will publish the availability of
discretionary funds in a subsequent
notice. This notice does include tables
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77345
of unobligated balances for earmarks
from previous years under the Bus and
Bus-Related Facilities Program, the New
Starts Program, the Clean Fuels
Program, and the Alternatives Analysis
Program. FTA will continue to honor
those earmarks. FTA will supplement
this notice, at a later date, to provide
any additional discretionary allocations
of funds made available in FY 2009 and
any lapsed prior year earmarks that the
Secretary of Transportation determines
to extend or reprogram, once the
Department has examined the requests.
D. Flexible Funding Procedures
Obligation authority for flexible
funds, high priority projects and other
transit projects in title 23 U.S.C. is
transferred to FTA when States and
local agencies determine that FTA will
administer the project. The liquidating
cash, however, is transferred between
Federal accounts only as needed to
ensure that adequate funds are available
for disbursement on a timely basis. In
order to track the cash flow more
closely, FTA no longer combines funds
transferred from FHWA into a single
grant with FTA funds in the program to
which they are transferred. FTA has
established codes and procedures for
grants involving funds transferred from
FHWA. Grantees can contact the
appropriate regional office for
assistance.
E. Changes in Match for Biodiesel
Vehicles and Hybrid Retrofits
Section 164 of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2008, allowed a 90
percent Federal share for biodiesel
buses and for the net capital cost of
factory-installed or retrofitted hybrid
electric propulsion systems and any
equipment related to such a system.
This increased federal share is a crosscutting provision and is applicable
across FTA programs for any grants
awarded during FY 2008 regardless of
what fiscal year funding is used. This
provision remains in effect pursuant to
Division A of the Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009, which
expires on or before March 6, 2009.
Grantees may apply for a 90 percent
Federal share for the entire cost of a
biodiesel bus, but only for the cost of
the propulsion system and related
equipment in the case of the hybrid
electric systems, not for 90 percent of
the cost of the entire vehicle. In lieu of
calculating the costs of the equipment
separately, grantees may apply for 83
percent of the cost of the vehicle.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77346
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
F. National Transit Database (NTD)
Disaster Adjustments Policy
Previously, when a transit provider
could not report to the NTD due to an
‘‘Act of God’’, such as an earthquake,
fire, or flood, FTA would grant the
affected transit provider a ‘‘hold
harmless adjustment,’’ by using the
previous year’s service data reported to
the NTD for that transit provider in the
apportionment of formula grants for
urbanized areas. On August 14, 2008,
FTA proposed to change this policy and
initiated notice and comment on the
proposal. Effective November 13, 2008,
(73 FR 67247), FTA established a new
policy, retroactive to NTD Report Year
(RY) 2007 data, allowing transit
providers that suffer a marked decrease
in service data due to a natural or manmade disaster to receive a similar ‘‘hold
harmless adjustment’’ in the
apportionment of formula grants for
urbanized areas. This adjustment is not
automatic and must be requested in
writing by either the affected transit
provider, or the affected designated
recipient for the urbanized area. FTA
will approve or deny each request at its
discretion based on the following
factors: (1) Whether a Federal disaster
declaration was in place for all or part
of the current report year, for either all
or part of the transit provider’s service
area; (2) whether the request
demonstrates that the decrease in transit
service from the report year before the
disaster is in large part due to the
ongoing impact of the disaster; and (3)
whether the request demonstrates that
the decrease in transit service
reasonably appears to be temporary, and
does not reflect the true transit needs of
the urbanized area. FTA will not grant
adjustment requests that do not address
all three factors. Adjustment requests
should include sufficient
documentation to allow FTA to evaluate
the request based on these factors. FTA
may request additional information
from an applicant for an adjustment to
evaluate the request based on these
factors. A request for an adjustment may
only be made for one year at a time.
Requests for an adjustment related to
the same disaster may be made in
subsequent years, provided that the
applicant can continue to support its
request based on the above factors. If the
adjustment request is granted, the NTD
data in all publicly-available data sets
and data products would remain
unadjusted, and would reflect the actual
NTD submission for the transit provider.
The only adjustment would be in using
data from the previous full NTD Report
Year before the disaster occurred in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
data sets used for the apportionments of
formula grants for urbanized areas.
Further instructions for requesting a
‘‘hold harmless’’ adjustment will be
found in future editions of the NTD
Annual Reporting Manual, available at
https://www.ntdprogram.gov.
IV. FTA Programs
This section of the notice provides
available FY 2009 funding and/or other
important program-related information
for the three major FTA funding
accounts included in the notice
(Formula and Bus Grants, Capital
Investment Grants, and Research
Grants). Of the 17 separate FTA
programs contained in this notice that
fall under the major program area
headings, funding for ten programs is
apportioned by statutory or
administrative formula. Funding for the
other seven is allocated on a
discretionary or competitive basis.
Funding and/or other important
information for each of the 17 programs
is presented immediately below. This
includes program apportionments or
allocations, certain program
requirements, length of time FY 2009
funding is available for obligation and
other significant program information
pertaining to FY 2009.
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305(d))
Section 5305(d) authorizes federal
funding to support a cooperative,
continuous, and comprehensive
planning program for transportation
investment decision-making at the
metropolitan area level. The specific
requirements of metropolitan
transportation planning are set forth in
49 U.S.C. 5303 and further explained in
23 CFR Part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR
Part 613, Statewide Transportation
Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. State Departments
of Transportation are direct recipients of
funds allocated by FTA, which are then
suballocated to Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPOs) by formula, for
planning activities that support the
economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and
efficiency; increasing the safety and
security of the transportation system for
motorized and non-motorized users;
increasing the accessibility and mobility
options available to people and for
freight; protecting and enhancing the
environment, promoting energy
conservation, and improving quality of
life; enhancing the integration and
connectivity of the transportation
system, across and between modes, for
people and freight; promoting efficient
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
system management and operation; and
emphasizing the preservation of the
existing transportation system. This
funding must support work elements
and activities resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods in the
metropolitan area. Comprehensive
transportation planning is not limited to
transit planning or surface
transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
source of Federal assistance. Eligible
work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to
management, planning, operations,
capital requirements, and economic
feasibility; evaluation of previously
funded projects; peer reviews and
exchanges of technical data,
information, assistance, and related
activities in support of planning and
environmental analysis among MPOs
and other transportation planners; work
elements and related activities
preliminary to and in preparation for
constructing, acquiring, or improving
the operation of facilities and
equipment. An exhaustive list of eligible
work activities is provided in FTA
Circular 8100.1C, Program Guidance for
Metropolitan Planning and State
Planning and Research Program Grants,
dated September 1, 2008. For more
about the Metropolitan Planning
Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C,
contact Victor Austin Office of Planning
and Environment at (202) 366–2996.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $38,068,323 to the
Metropolitan Planning Program (49
U.S.C. 5305(d)) to support metropolitan
transportation planning activities set
forth in 49 U.S.C. 5303. The total
amount apportioned for the
Metropolitan Planning Program to States
for MPOs’ use in urbanized areas
(UZAs) is 37,877,981, as shown in the
table below, after the deduction for
oversight and the addition of prior year
reapportioned funds.
METROPOLITAN PLANNING PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...........
Oversight Deduction .........
$38,068,323
¥190,342
Total Apportioned ......
37,877,981
States’ apportionments for this
program are displayed in Table 2.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
2. Basis for Formula Apportionments
As specified in law, 82.72 percent of
the amounts authorized for Section 5305
are allocated to the Metropolitan
Planning program. FTA allocates
Metropolitan Planning funds to the
States according to a statutory formula.
Eighty percent of the funds are
distributed to the States as a basic
allocation based on each State’s UZA
population, based on the most recent
decennial Census. The remaining 20
percent is provided to the States as a
supplemental allocation based on an
FTA administrative formula to address
planning needs in the larger, more
complex UZAs. The amount published
for each State is a combined total of
both the basic and supplemental
allocation.
3. Program Requirements
The State allocates Metropolitan
Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or
portions thereof to provide funds for
projects included in an annual work
program (the Unified Planning Work
Program, or UPWP) that includes both
highway and transit planning projects.
Each State has either reaffirmed or
developed, in consultation with their
MPOs, a new allocation formula, as a
result of the 2000 Census. The State
allocation formula may be changed
annually, but any change requires
approval by the FTA regional office
before grant approval. Program guidance
for the Metropolitan Planning Program
is found in FTA Circular 8100.1C,
Program Guidance for Metropolitan
Planning and State Planning and
Research Program Grants, dated
September 1, 2008. For more about the
Metropolitan Planning Program and the
FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact Victor
Austin of the Office of Planning and
Environment at (202) 366–2996.
4. Period of Availability
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
The funds apportioned under the
Metropolitan Planning program remain
available to be obligated by FTA to
recipients for four fiscal years—which
includes the year of apportionment plus
three additional years. Any apportioned
funds that remain unobligated at the
close of business on September 30,
2012, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment under the
Metropolitan Planning Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Planning Emphasis Areas (PEAs).
FTA and FHWA are not issuing new
PEAs this year, and are rescinding PEAs
issued in prior years, in light of the
priority given to implementation of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
SAFETEA–LU planning and program
provisions.
b. Consolidated Planning Grants. FTA
and FHWA planning funds under both
the Metropolitan Planning and State
Planning and Research Programs can be
consolidated into a single consolidated
planning grant (CPG), awarded by either
FTA or FHWA. The CPG eliminates the
need to monitor individual fund
sources, if several have been used, and
ensures that the oldest funds will
always be used first. Unlike ‘‘flex
funds’’ for capital programs, planning
funds from FHWA may be combined
with FTA planning funds in a single
grant. Alternatively, FTA planning
funds may be transferred to FHWA to be
administered as combined grants.
Under the CPG, States can report
metropolitan planning program
expenditures (to comply with the Single
Audit Act) for both FTA and FHWA
under the Catalogue of Federal Domestic
Assistance number for FTA’s
Metropolitan Planning Program
(20.505). Additionally, for States with
an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL)
fund-matching ratio greater than 80
percent, the State can waive the 20
percent local share requirement, with
FTA’s concurrence, to allow FTA funds
used for metropolitan planning in a CPG
to be granted at the higher FHWA rate.
For some States, this Federal match rate
can exceed 90 percent.
States interested in transferring
planning funds between FTA and
FHWA should contact the FTA Regional
Office or FHWA Division Office for
more detailed procedures. Current
guidelines are included in Federal
Highway Administration Memorandum
dated July 12, 2007, ‘‘Information: Final
Transfers to Other Agencies that
Administer Title 23 Programs.’’
For further information on CPGs,
contact Kristen Clarke, Office of Budget
and Policy, FTA, at (202) 366–1686, Ken
Johnson, Office of Program
Management, FTA, at (202) 366–1659,
or Kenneth Petty, Office of Planning and
Environment, FHWA, at (202) 366–
6654.
B. State Planning and Research Program
(49 U.S.C. 5305(e))
This program provides financial
assistance to States for Statewide
transportation planning and other
technical assistance activities, including
supplementing the technical assistance
program provided through the
Metropolitan Planning program. The
specific requirements of Statewide
transportation planning are set forth in
49 U.S.C. 5304 and further explained in
23 CFR Part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR
Part 613, Statewide Transportation
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77347
Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. This funding must
support work elements and activities
resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning
is not limited to transit planning or
surface transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
source of Federal assistance. For more
information, contact Victor Austin of
the Office of Planning and Environment
at (202) 366–2996.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $7,952,377 to the State
Planning and Research Program (49
U.S.C. 5305). The total amount
apportioned for the State Planning and
Research Program (SPRP) is $7,912,615,
as shown in the table below, after the
deduction for oversight (authorized by
49 U.S.C. 5327).
STATE PLANNING AND RESEARCH
PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...........
Oversight Deduction .........
$7,952,377
¥39,762
Total Apportioned ......
7,912,615
State apportionments for this program
are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
As specified in law, 17.28 percent of
the amounts authorized for Section 5305
are allocated to the State Planning and
Research program. FTA apportions
funds to States by a statutory formula
that is based on the most recent
decennial Census, and the State’s UZA
population as compared to the UZA
population of all States.
3. Requirements
Funds are provided to States for
Statewide transportation planning
programs. These funds may be used for
a variety of purposes such as planning,
technical studies and assistance,
demonstrations, and management
training. In addition, a State may
authorize a portion of these funds to be
used to supplement Metropolitan
Planning funds allocated by the State to
its UZAs, as the State deems
appropriate. Program guidance for the
State Planning and Research program is
found in FTA Circular 8100.1C. This
funding must support work elements
and activities resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77348
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
transportation planning for the
movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning
is not limited to transit planning or
surface transportation planning, but also
encompasses the relationships among
land use and all transportation modes,
without regard to the programmatic
source of Federal assistance. Eligible
work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to
management, planning, operations,
capital requirements, and economic
feasibility; evaluation of previously
funded projects; peer reviews and
exchanges of technical data,
information, assistance, and related
activities in support of planning and
environmental analysis; work elements
and related activities preliminary to and
in preparation for constructing,
acquiring, or improving the operation of
facilities and equipment. An exhaustive
list of eligible work activities is
provided in FTA Circular 8100.1C,
Program Guidance for Metropolitan
Planning and State Planning and
Research Program Grants, dated
September 1, 2008. For more
information, contact Victor Austin,
Office of Planning and Environment at
(202) 366–2996.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the
State Planning and Research program
remain available to be obligated by FTA
to recipients for four fiscal years—
which include the year of
apportionment plus three additional
fiscal years. Any apportioned funds that
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2012, will
revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the State Planning and Research
Program.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
See Section A5 for information about
Planning Emphasis Areas and CPGs.
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49
U.S.C. 5307)
Section 5307 authorizes Federal
capital and operating assistance, in
some cases, for transit in Urbanized
Areas (UZAs). A UZA is an area with a
population of 50,000 or more that has
been defined and designated as such in
the most recent decennial Census by the
U.S. Census Bureau. The Urbanized
Area Formula Program funds may also
be used to support planning activities,
and may supplement to planning
projects funded under the Metropolitan
Planning program described above.
Urbanized Areas Formula Program
funds used for planning must be shown
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area. Funding is
apportioned directly to each UZA with
a population of 200,000 or more, and to
the State Governors for UZAs with
populations between 50,000 and
200,000. Eligible applicants are limited
to entities designated as recipients in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5307(a)(2)
and other public entities with the
consent of the Designated Recipient.
Generally, operating assistance is not an
eligible expense for UZAs with
populations of 200,000 or more.
However, there are several exceptions to
this restriction. The exceptions are
described in section 3(d)(5) below.
For more information about the
Urbanized Area Formula Program
contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–1660.
Table 4 includes detailed information
about the formulas.
To calculate a UZA’s FY 2009
apportionment, FTA used population
and population density statistics from
the 2000 Census and (when applicable)
validated mileage and transit service
data from transit providers’ 2007
National Transit Database (NTD) Report
Year. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b),
FTA used 60 percent of the directional
route miles attributable to the Alaska
Railroad passenger operations system to
calculate the apportionment for the
Anchorage, Alaska UZA.
We have calculated dollar unit values
for the formula factors used in the
Urbanized Area Formula Program
apportionment calculations. These
values represent the amount of money
each unit of a factor is worth in this
year’s apportionment. The unit values
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
change each year, based on all of the
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
data used to calculate the
2009, provides $1,682,053,574 to the
apportionments. The dollar unit values
Urbanized Area Formula Program (49
for FY 2009 are displayed in Table 5. To
U.S.C. 5307). The total amount
replicate the basic formula component
apportioned for the Urbanized Area
of a UZA’s apportionment, multiply the
Formula Program is $1,828,187,915 as
dollar unit value by the appropriate
shown in the table below, after the 0.75
formula factor (i.e., the population,
percent deduction for oversight
population × population density), and
(authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and
when applicable, data from the NTD
including funds apportioned to UZAs
(i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles,
from the appropriation for Section 5340 passenger miles, and operating cost).
for Growing States and High Density
In FY 2009, one percent of funds
States.
appropriated for Section 5307, or
$16,820,536 based on the Continuing
URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM Appropriations Act, is set aside for
Small Transit Intensive Cities (STIC).
Total Appropriation .........
$1,682,053,574 a FTA apportions these funds to UZAs
Oversight Deduction .......
¥12,615,402 under 200,000 in population that
Section 5340 Funds
operate at a level of service equal to or
Added ..........................
158,749,743
above the industry average level of
Total Apportioned ....
1,828,187,915 service for all UZAs with a population
of at least 200,000, but not more than
a One percent set-aside for Small Transit In999,999, in one or more of six
tensive Cities Formula.
performance categories: Passenger miles
traveled per vehicle revenue mile,
Table 3 displays the amounts
passenger miles traveled per vehicle
apportioned under the Urbanized Area
revenue hour, vehicle revenue miles per
Formula Program.
capita, vehicle revenue hours per capita,
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
passenger miles traveled per capita, and
passengers per capita.
FTA apportions Urbanized Area
Formula Program funds based on
The data for these categories for the
legislative formulas. Different formulas
purpose of FY 2009 apportionments
apply to UZAs with populations of
comes from the NTD reports for the
200,000 or more and to UZAs with
2007 reporting year. This data is used to
populations less than 200,000. For
determine a UZA’s eligibility under the
UZAs with 50,000 to 199,999 in
STIC formula, and is also used in the
population, the formula is based solely
STIC apportionment calculations.
on population and population density.
Because these performance data change
For UZAs with populations of 200,000
with each year’s NTD reports, the UZAs
and more, the formula is based on a
eligible for STIC funds and the amount
combination of bus revenue vehicle
each receives may vary each year. In FY
miles, bus passenger miles, fixed
2009, FTA apportioned $56,826 for each
guideway revenue vehicle miles, and
performance factor/category for which
fixed guideway route miles, as well as
the urbanized area exceeded the
population and population density.
national average for UZAs with a
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
population of at least 200,000 but not
more than 999,999.
In addition to the funds apportioned
to UZAs, according to the Section 5307
formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C.
5336, FTA also apportions funds to
urbanized areas under Section 5340
Growing States and High Density States
formula factors. In FY 2009, FTA
apportions $64,557,843 to 453 UZA’s in
all 50 States and $94,191,900 to 46
UZAs in seven High Density States. Half
of the funds appropriated for Section
5340 are available to Growing States and
half to High Density States. FTA
apportions Growing States funds by a
formula based on State population
forecasts for 15 years beyond the most
recent Census. FTA distributes the
amounts apportioned for each State
between UZAs and nonurbanized areas
based on the ratio of urbanized/
nonurbanized population within each
State in the 2000 census, and to UZAs
proportionately based on UZA
population in the 2000 census because
population estimates are not available at
the UZA level. FTA apportions the High
Density States funds to States with
population densities in excess of 370
persons per square mile. These funds
are apportioned only to UZAs within
those States. FTA pro-rates each UZA’s
share of the High Density funds based
on the population of the UZAs in the
State in the 2000 census.
FTA cannot provide unit values for
the Growing States or High Density
formulas because the allocations to
individual States and urbanized areas
are based on their relative population
data, rather than on a national per capita
basis.
Based on language in the conference
report accompanying SAFETEA–LU,
FTA is to show a single apportionment
amount for Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. FTA shows a single
Section 5307 apportionment amount for
each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized
Area Formula apportionments. The
amount includes funds apportioned
based on the Section 5307 formula
factors, any STIC funds, and any
Growing States and High Density States
funding allocated to the area. FTA uses
separate formulas to calculate and
generate the respective apportionment
amounts for the Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. For technical assistance
purposes, the UZAs that received STIC
funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will
make available breakouts of the funding
allocated to each UZA under these
formulas, upon request to the regional
office.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
3. Program Requirements
Program guidance for the Urbanized
Area Formula Program is presently
found in FTA Circular C9030.1C,
Urbanized Area Formula Program: Grant
Application Instructions, dated October
1, 1998, and supplemented by
additional information or changes
provided in this document. FTA is in
the process of updating the circular.
Several important program requirements
are highlighted below.
a. Urbanized Area Formula
Apportionments to Governors
For small UZAs, those with a
population of less than 200,000, FTA
apportions funds to the Governor of
each State for distribution. A single total
Governor’s apportionment amount for
the Urbanized Area Formula, STIC, and
Growing States and High Density States
is shown in the Urbanized Area
Formula Apportionment Table 3. The
table also shows the apportionment
amount attributable to each small UZA
within the State. The Governor may
determine the sub-allocation of funds
among the small UZAs except that
funds attributed to a small UZA that is
located within the planning boundaries
of a Transportation Management Area
(TMA) must be obligated to that small
UZA, as discussed in subsection f
below.
b. Transit Enhancements
Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that
one percent of Section 5307 funds
apportioned to UZAs with populations
of 200,000 or more be spent on eligible
transit enhancement activities or
projects. This requirement is now
treated as a certification, rather than as
a set-aside as was the case under the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA–21). Designated
recipients in UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more certify they are
spending not less than one percent of
Section 5307 funds for transit
enhancements. In addition, Designated
Recipients must submit an annual
report on how they spent the money
with the Federal fiscal year’s final
quarterly progress report in TEAM-Web.
The report should include the following
elements: (a) Grantee name; (b) UZA
name and number; (c) FTA project
number; (d) transit enhancement
category; (e) brief description of
enhancement and progress towards
project implementation; (f) activity line
item code from the approved budget;
and (g) amount awarded by FTA for the
enhancement. The list of transit
enhancement categories and activity
line item (ALI) codes may be found in
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77349
the table of Scope and ALI codes on
TEAM-Web, which can be accessed at
https://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
The term ‘‘transit enhancement’’
includes projects or project elements
that are designed to enhance public
transportation service or use and are
physically or functionally related to
transit facilities. Eligible enhancements
include the following: (1) Historic
preservation, rehabilitation, and
operation of historic mass transportation
buildings, structures, and facilities
(including historic bus and railroad
facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3)
landscaping and other scenic
beautification, including tables,
benches, trash receptacles, and street
lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian
access and walkways; (6) bicycle access,
including bicycle storage facilities and
installing equipment for transporting
bicycles on mass transportation
vehicles; (7) transit connections to parks
within the recipient’s transit service
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced
access for persons with disabilities to
mass transportation.
It is the responsibility of the MPO to
determine how the one-percent for
transit enhancements will be allotted to
transit projects. The one percent
minimum requirement does not
preclude more than one percent from
being expended in a UZA for transit
enhancements. However, activities that
are only eligible as enhancements—in
particular, operating costs for historic
facilities—may be assisted only within
the one-percent funding level.
c. Transit Security Projects
Pursuant to section 5307(d)(1)(J), each
recipient of Urbanized Area Formula
funds must certify that of the amount
received each fiscal year, it will expend
at least one percent on ‘‘public
transportation security projects’’ or must
certify that it has decided the
expenditure is not necessary. For
applicants not eligible to receive Section
5307 funds for operating assistance,
only capital security projects may be
funded with the one percent.
SAFETEA–LU, however, expanded the
definition of eligible ‘‘capital’’ projects
to include specific crime prevention and
security activities, including: (1)
Projects to refine and develop security
and emergency response plans; (2)
projects aimed at detecting chemical
and biological agents in public
transportation; (3) the conduct of
emergency response drills with public
transportation agencies and local first
response agencies; and (4) security
training for public transportation
employees, but excluding all expenses
related to operations, other than such
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77350
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
expenses incurred in conducting
emergency drills and training. ALI
codes have been established for these
four new capital activities. The one
percent may also include security
expenditures included within other
capital activities, and, where the
recipient is eligible, operating
assistance. The relevant ALI codes
would be used for those activities.
FTA is often called upon to report to
Congress and others on how grantees are
expending Federal funds for security
enhancements. To facilitate tracking of
grantees’ security expenditures, which
are not always evident when included
within larger capital or operating
activity line items in the grant budget,
we have established a non-additive
(‘‘non-add’’) scope code for security
expenditures—Scope 991. The non-add
scope is to be used to aggregate
activities included in other scopes, and
it does not increase the budget total.
Section 5307 grantees should include
this non-add scope in the project budget
for each new Section 5307 grant
application or amendment. Under this
non-add scope, the applicant should
repeat the full amount of any of the line
items in the budget that are exclusively
for security and include the portion of
any other line item in the project budget
that is attributable to security, using
under the non-add scope the same line
item used in the project budget. The
grantee can modify the ALI description
or use the extended text feature, if
necessary, to describe the security
expenditures.
The grantee must provide information
regarding its use of the one percent for
security as part of each Section 5307
grant application, using a special screen
in TEAM-Web. If the grantee has
certified that it is not necessary to
expend one percent for security, the
Section 5307 grant application must
include information to support that
certification. FTA will not process an
application for a Section 5307 grant
until the security information is
complete.
d. FY 2009 Operating Assistance
UZAs under 200,000 in population
may use Section 5307 funds for
operating assistance. In addition,
Section 5307, as amended by,
SAFETEA–LU and TEA–21, allows
some UZAs with a population of
200,000 or more to use FY 2009
Urbanized Area Formula funds for
operating assistance under certain
conditions. The specific provisions
allowing the limited use of operating
assistance in large UZAs are as follows:
(1) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for
grants for the operating costs of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
equipment and facilities for use in
public transportation in the Evansville,
IN–KY urbanized area, for a portion or
portions of the UZA if the portion of the
UZA includes only one State, the
population of the portion is less than
30,000, and the grants will be not used
to provide public transportation outside
of the portion of the UZA.
(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides
operating costs of equipment and
facilities for use in public transportation
for local governmental authorities in
areas which adopted transit operating
and financing plans that became a part
of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result
of the 2000 decennial census of
population, but lie outside the service
area of the principal public
transportation agency that serves the
Houston UZA.
(3) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the
formula to be used to apportion Section
5307 funds to UZAs with population of
200,000 or more. SAFETEA–LU
amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that
stated, ‘‘* * * except that the amount
apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized
area under subsection (b) shall be
available to the Alaska Railroad for any
costs related to its passenger
operations.’’ This language has the effect
of directing that funds apportioned to
the Anchorage urbanized area, under
the fixed guideway tiers of the Section
5307 apportionment formula, be made
available to the Alaska Railroad, and
that these funds may be used for any
capital or operating costs related to its
passenger operations.
(4) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA–21, as
amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note),
provides an exception to the restriction
on the use of operating assistance in a
UZA with a population of 200,000 or
more, by allowing transit providers/
grantees that provide service exclusively
to elderly persons and persons with
disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds
apportioned to the UZA for operating
assistance. The total amount of funding
made available for this purpose under
Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million.
Transit providers/grantees eligible
under this provision have already been
identified and notified.
(5) Pursuant to the SAFETEA–LU
Technical Corrections Act, 2008, in FY
2009, section 5307(b)(2) allows (1)
UZAs that grew in population from
under 200,000 to over 200,000 or that
were under 200,000 but merged into
another urbanized area and the
population is over 200,000, as a result
of the 2000 Census to use Section 5307
funds for operating assistance in an
amount up to 50 percent of the
grandfathered amount for FY 2002
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
funds; (2) Areas that were nonurbanized
under the 1990 Census and became
urbanized, as a result of the 2000
Census, to use no more than 50 percent
of the amount apportioned to the area
for FY 2003 for operating assistance;
and (3) nonurbanized areas under the
1990 Census that merged into urbanized
areas over 200,000, as a result of the
2000 Census, to use 50 percent of the
amount the area received in FY 2002
Section 5311 funding for operating
assistance.
e. Sources of Local Match
Pursuant to Section 5307(e), the
Federal share of an urbanized area
formula grant is 80 percent of net
project cost for a capital project and 50
percent of net project cost for operating
assistance unless the recipients project
a greater local share. The remainder of
the net project cost (i.e., 20 percent and
50 percent, respectively) shall be
provided from the following sources:
1. In cash from non-Government
sources other than revenues from
providing public transportation
services;
2. From revenues derived from the
sale of advertising and concessions;
3. From an undistributed cash
surplus, a replacement or depreciation
cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
4. From amounts received under a
service agreement with a State or local
social service agency or private social
service organization; and
5. Proceeds from the issuance of
revenue bonds.
In addition, funds from Section
403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be
used to match Urbanized Area Formula
funds.
f. Designated Transportation
Management Areas (TMA)
Guidance for setting the boundaries of
TMAs is in the joint transportation
planning regulations codified at 23 CFR
Part 450 as reference in 49 CFR Part 613.
In some cases, the TMA planning
boundaries established by the MPO for
the designated TMA includes one or
more small UZAs. In addition, one
small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has been
designated as a TMA. In either of these
situations, the Governor cannot allocate
‘‘Governor’s Apportionment’’ funds
attributed to the small UZAs to other
areas; that is, the Governor only has
discretion to allocate Governor’s
Apportionment funds attributable to
areas that are outside of designated
TMA planning boundaries.
The list of small UZAs included
within the planning boundaries of
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
77351
designated TMAs is provided in the
table below.
Designated TMA
Small urbanized area included in TMA planning boundary
Albany, NY ..........................................................
Houston, TX ........................................................
Jacksonville, FL ..................................................
Orlando, FL .........................................................
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL ....................................
Philadelphia, PA–NJ–DE–MD ............................
Pittsburg, PA .......................................................
Seattle, WA .........................................................
Washington, DC–VA–MD ...................................
Saratoga Springs, NY.
Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-Angleton, TX; Texas City, TX; The Woodlands, TX.
St. Augustine, FL.
Kissimmee, FL.
Titusville, FL.
Pottstown, PA.
Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-Steubenville, OH–PA (PA portion); Uniontown-Connellsville, PA.
Bremerton, WA.
Frederick, MD.
The MPO must notify the Associate
Administrator for Program Management,
Federal Transit Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, in writing, no later than July
1 of each year, to identify any small
UZA within the planning boundaries of
a TMA.
g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used
for Highway Purposes
Funds apportioned to a TMA are
eligible for transfer to FHWA for
highway projects, if the Designated
Recipient has allocated a portion of the
areas section 5307 funding for such use.
However, before funds can be
transferred, the following conditions
must be met: (1) Such use must be
approved by the MPO in writing, after
appropriate notice and opportunity for
comment and appeal are provided to
affected transit providers; (2) in the
determination of the Secretary, such
funds are not needed for investments
required by the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA); and (3)
the MPO determines that local transit
needs are being addressed.
The MPO should notify the
appropriate FTA Regional
Administrator of its intent to use FTA
funds for highway purposes, as
prescribed in section V.D below.
Urbanized Area Formula funds that are
designated by the MPO for highway
projects will be transferred to and
administered by FHWA.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
4. Period of Availability
The Urbanized Area Formula Program
funds apportioned in this notice remain
available to be obligated during the year
of appropriation plus three additional
years. Accordingly, these funds must be
obligated by FTA to recipients by
September 30, 2012. Any of these
apportioned funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on
September 30, 2012, will revert to FTA
for reapportionment under the
Urbanized Area Formula Program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
In each UZA with a population of
200,000 or more, the Governor in
consultation with responsible local
officials, and publicly owned operators
of public transportation has designated
one or more entities to be the
Designated Recipient for Section 5307
funds apportioned to the UZA. The
same entity(s) may or may not be the
Designated Recipient for the Job Access
and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New
Freedom program funds apportioned to
the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 in
population, the State is the Designated
Recipient for Section 5307 as well as
JARC and New Freedom programs. The
Designated Recipient for Section 5307
may authorize other entities to apply
directly to FTA for Section 5307 grants
pursuant to a supplemental agreement.
While the requirement that projects
selected for funding be included in a
locally developed coordinated public
transit/human service transportation
plan is not included in Section 5307 as
it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that
in their role as public transit providers,
recipients of Section 5307 funds will be
participants in the local planning
process for these programs.
D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49 U.S.C.
5308)
The Clean Fuels Grant Program
supports the use of alternative fuels in
air quality maintenance or
nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon
monoxide through capital grants to
urbanized areas for clean fuel vehicles
and facilities. Previously an unfunded
Formula Program under TEA–21, the
program is now a discretionary program.
For more information about this
program, contact Kimberly Sledge,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–
2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $21,074,900 to the Clean
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Fuels Grant Program (49 U.S.C. 5308).
FTA will publish project allocations in
a supplemental notice when all program
funds have been made available.
2. Requirements
Clean Fuels program funds may be
made available to any grantee in a UZA
that is designated as maintenance or
nonattainment area for ozone or carbon
monoxide as defined in the Clean Air
Act. Eligible recipients include Section
5307 Designated Recipients as well as
recipients in small UZAs. In the case of
a small UZA, the State in which the area
is located will act as the recipient.
Eligible projects include the purchase
or lease of clean fuel buses (including
buses that employ a lightweight
composite primary structure), the
construction or lease of clean fuel buses
or electrical recharging facilities and
related equipment for such buses, and
construction or improvement of public
transportation facilities to accommodate
clean fuel buses.
Legislation will be necessary if a
recipient wishes to use Clean Fuels
funds earmarked in SAFETEA–LU for
eligible program activities outside the
scope of a project description.
Unless otherwise specified in law,
grants made under the Clean Fuels
program must meet all other eligibility
requirements as outlined in Section
5308.
3. Period of Availability
Funds designated for specific Clean
Fuels Program projects remain available
for obligation for three fiscal years,
which includes the year of
appropriation plus two additional fiscal
years. The FY 2009 funding for projects
will remain available through
September 30, 2011. Clean Fuels funds
not obligated in an FTA grant for
eligible purposes at the end of the
period of availability will generally be
made available for other projects.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77352
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
5. Other Program or Allocation Related
Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated balances for
Clean Fuel allocations in the amount of
$46,862,483 remain available for
obligation in FY 2009. This includes
$6,690,000 in FY 2007 and $40,172,483
in FY 2008 unobligated allocations. The
unobligated amounts available as of
September 30, 2008, are displayed in
Table 7.
E. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—Fixed Guideway
Modernization
This program provides capital
assistance for the modernization of
existing fixed guideway systems. Funds
are allocated by a statutory formula to
UZAs with fixed guideway systems that
have been in operation for at least seven
years. A ‘‘fixed guideway’’ refers to any
transit service that uses exclusive or
controlled rights-of-way or rails, entirely
or in part. The term includes heavy rail,
commuter rail, light rail, monorail,
trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined
plane, cable car, automated guideway
transit, ferryboats, that portion of motor
bus service operated on exclusive or
controlled rights-of-way, and highoccupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes. Eligible
applicants are the public transit
authorities in those urbanized areas to
which the funds are allocated. For more
information about Fixed Guideway
Modernization contact Scott Faulk,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–
2053.
based on amounts specified in law and
NTD data used to apportion funds in FY
1997. Funding under the last three tiers
is apportioned based on the latest
available data on route miles and
revenue vehicle miles on segments at
least seven years old, as reported to the
NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C.
provides for the inclusion of
Morgantown, West Virginia (population
55,997) as an eligible UZA for purposes
of apportioning fixed guideway
modernization funds. Also, pursuant to
49 U.S.C. 5336(b) FTA used 60 percent
of the directional route miles
attributable to the Alaska Railroad
passenger operations system to calculate
the apportionment for the Anchorage,
Alaska UZA under the Section 5309
Fixed Guideway Modernization
formula.
FY 2009 Formula apportionments are
based on data grantees provided to the
NTD for the 2007 reporting year. Table
9 provides additional information and
details on the formula. Dollar unit
values for the formula factors used in
the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Program are displayed in Table 5. To
replicate an area’s apportionment,
multiply the dollar unit value by the
appropriate formula factor, i.e., route
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
must be used for capital projects to
maintain, modernize, or improve fixed
guideway systems. Eligible UZAs (those
with a population of 200,000 or more)
with fixed guideway systems that are at
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
least seven years old are entitled to
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization
2009, provides $675,257,000 to the
funds. A threshold level of more than
Fixed Guideway Modernization
one mile of fixed guideway is required
Program. The total amount apportioned
in order to receive Fixed Guideway
for the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs
Program is $668,504,430, after the
deduction for oversight, and addition of reporting one mile or less of fixed
guideway mileage under the NTD are
prior year reapportioned funds, as
not included. However, funds
shown in the table below.
apportioned to an urbanized area may
be used on any fixed guideway segment
FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION
in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed
PROGRAM
Guideway Modernization is presently
found in FTA Circular C9300.1B,
Total Appropriation ...........
$675,257,000
Oversight Deduction .........
¥6,752,570 Capital Facilities and Formula Grant
Programs, dated November 1, 2008.
Total Apportioned ......
668,504,430
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
The FY 2009 Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program apportionments
to eligible areas are displayed in Table
8.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The formula for allocating the Fixed
Guideway Modernization funds
contains seven tiers. The apportionment
of funding under the first four tiers is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned in this notice
under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program remain
available to be obligated by FTA to
recipients during the year of
appropriation plus three additional
years. FY 2009 Fixed Guideway
Modernization funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on
September 30, 2012, will revert to FTA
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
for reapportionment under the Fixed
Guideway Modernization Program.
F. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities
This program provides capital
assistance for new and replacement
buses, and related equipment and
facilities. Funds are allocated on a
discretionary basis. Eligible purposes
are acquisition of buses for fleet and
service expansion, bus maintenance and
administrative facilities, transfer
facilities, bus malls, transportation
centers, intermodal terminals, park-andride stations, acquisition of replacement
vehicles, bus rebuilds, bus preventive
maintenance, passenger amenities such
as passenger shelters and bus stop signs,
accessory and miscellaneous equipment
such as mobile radio units, supervisory
vehicles, fare boxes, computers, and
shop and garage equipment. Eligible
applicants are State and local
governmental authorities. Eligible
subrecipients include other public
agencies, private companies engaged in
public transportation and private nonprofit organizations. For more
information about Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities contact Kimberly Sledge,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–
2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $350,455,128 for the Bus
and Bus-Related Facilities program.
FTA will publish project allocations in
a supplemental notice when all program
funds have been made available.
The SAFETEA–LU Technical
Corrections Act of 2008 extended funds
made available for FY 2006
SAFTETEA–LU projects number 176
and 652. Funds for these projects
remain available until September 30,
2009 and are shown in Table 10.
2. Requirements
FTA honors Congressional earmarks
for the purpose designated, for purposes
eligible under the program or under the
expanded eligibility of a
‘‘notwithstanding’’ provision. Projects
designated for funding in the report
language accompanying the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008,
were incorporated as earmarks into the
Act by reference. FTA will treat these
projects as projects designated in law.
To apply to use funds designated in
report language under the Bus Program
in any year for project activities outside
the scope of the project designation
included in report language, the
recipient must submit a request for
reprogramming to the House and Senate
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
Committees on Appropriations for
resolution.
FTA will continue to honor projects
earmarked to receive Section 5309 bus
funds in SAFETEA–LU for fiscal years
2007 and 2008 as well as projects
earmarked by reference in the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008.
Legislation will be necessary to amend
the earmark if you wish to use funds for
project activities outside the scope of
the project description.
Grants made under the Bus and BusRelated Facilities program must meet all
other eligibility requirements as
outlined in Section 5309 unless
otherwise specified in law.
Program guidance for Bus and BusRelated Facilities is found in FTA
Circular C9300.1B, ‘‘Capital Investment
Program Guidance and Application
Instructions,’’ (November 1, 2008).
3. Period of Availability
The FY 2007 and FY 2008 Bus and
Bus-Related Facilities funds not
obligated in a grant for eligible purposes
as of September 30, 2009 and September
30, 2010, respectively, may be made
available for other projects under 49
U.S.C. 5309.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
4. Other Program or Allocation Related
Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated balances for
Bus and Bus-Related allocations in the
amount of $665,031,952 remain
available for obligation in FY 2009. This
includes $1,772,317 for FY 2006
earmarks extended in the SAFETEA–LU
Technical Corrections Act, 2008;
$197,666,184 in FY 2007 unobligated
allocations (earmarked and
discretionary projects); and
$465,593,451in FY 2008 unobligated
allocations. The unobligated amounts
available as of September 30, 2008, are
displayed in Table 10. The FTA will
issue a supplemental notice at a later
date that identifies project funds that are
redirected to other eligible activities or
extended to the original project by
subsequent action. Project funding that
was extended or redirected under the
SAFETEA–LU Technical Corrections
Act of 2008 are listed above in section
1 and also included in Table 10.
G. Capital Investment Program (49
U.S.C. 5309)—New Starts
The New Starts program provides
funds for construction of new fixed
guideway systems or extensions to
existing fixed guideway systems.
Eligible purposes are light rail, rapid rail
(heavy rail), commuter rail, monorail,
automated fixed guideway system (such
as a ‘‘people mover’’), or a busway/high
occupancy vehicle (HOV) facility, Bus
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
Rapid Transit that is fixed guideway, or
an extension of any of these. Projects
become candidates for funding under
this program by successfully completing
the appropriate steps in the major
capital investment planning and project
development process. Major new fixed
guideway projects, or extensions to
existing systems, financed with New
Starts funds typically receive these
funds through a full funding grant
agreement (FFGA) that defines the scope
of the project and specifies the total
multi-year Federal commitment to the
project. Beginning in FY 2007, up to
$200,000,000 each year is designated for
‘‘Small Starts’’ (Section 5309(e)) projects
with a New Starts share of less than
$75,000,000 and a net project cost of
less than $250,000,000.
For more information about New
Starts project development contact
Elizabeth Day, Office of Planning and
Environment, at (202) 366–4033, or for
information about published allocations
contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $668,117,803 to New
Starts. The total amount allocated for
New Starts is $430,252,472, as shown in
the table below.
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (NEW
STARTS)
Total Appropriation ...........
Oversight (one percent) ....
Undistributed Amount .......
$674,866,468
¥6,748,665
237,865,331
Total Allocated ...........
430,252,472
2. Basis for Allocation
Congress included authorizations for
specific New Starts projects with Full
Funding Grant Agreements (FFGA) in
SAFETEA–LU. Under the Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009, FFGAs have
been allocated 5/12ths and the one
percent statutory project management
oversight takedown has been applied.
Funds allocated to specific projects are
shown in Table 11.
3. Requirements
Because New Starts projects are
earmarked in law rather than report
language, reprogramming for a purpose
other than that specified must also
occur in law. New Starts projects are
subject to a complex set of approvals
related to planning and project
development set forth in 49 CFR Part
611. FTA has published a number of
rulemakings and interim guidance
documents related to the New Starts
program since the passage of SAFETEA–
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77353
LU. Grantees should reference the FTA
Web site at https://www.fta.dot.gov for
the most current program guidance
about project developments and
management. Grant related guidance for
New Starts is found in FTA Circular
C9300.1B, Capital Investment Program
Guidance and Application Instructions
dated November 1, 2008; and C5200.1A,
Full Funding Grant Agreement
Guidance, dated December 5, 2002.
4. Period of Availability
New Starts funds remain available for
three fiscal years (including the fiscal
year the funds are made available or
appropriated plus two additional years).
FY 2009 funds remain available through
September 30, 2011. Funds may be
made available for other section 5309
projects after the period of availability
has expired.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated allocations for
New Starts in the amount of
$325,627,924 remain available for
obligation in FY 2009. This amount
includes $62,712,383 in FY 2007 and
$262,915,541 in FY 2008 unobligated
allocations. These unobligated amounts
are displayed in Table 12.
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals
and Individuals With Disabilities
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
This program provides formula
funding to States for capital projects to
assist private nonprofit groups in
meeting the transportation needs of the
elderly and individuals with disabilities
when the public transportation service
provided in the area is unavailable,
insufficient, or inappropriate to meet
these needs. A State agency designated
by the Governor administers the Section
5310 program. The State’s
responsibilities include: Notifying
eligible local entities of funding
availability; developing project selection
criteria; determining applicant
eligibility; selecting projects for funding;
and ensuring that all subrecipients
comply with Federal requirements.
Eligible nonprofit organizations or
public bodies must apply directly to the
designated State agency for assistance
under this program. For more
information about the Elderly and
Individuals with Disabilities Program
contact David Schneider, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $54,622,700 to the
Elderly and Individuals with
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310).
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77354
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
States may use up to ten percent of
their annual apportionment to
administer, plan, and provide technical
assistance for a funded project. No local
share is required for these program
administrative funds. Funds used under
this program for planning must be
ELDERLY AND INDIVIDUALS WITH
shown in the United Planning Work
DISABILITIES PROGRAM
Program (UPWP) for MPO(s) with
Total Appropriation ...........
$54,622,700 responsibility for that area.
Oversight Deduction .........
¥273,113
The State recipient must certify that:
The projects selected were derived from
Total Apportioned ......
54,349,587 a locally developed, coordinated public
transit-human services transportation
The FY 2009 Elderly and Individuals
plan; and, the plan was developed
with Disabilities Program
through a process that included
apportionments to the States are
representatives of public, private, and
displayed in Table 13.
nonprofit transportation and human
services providers and participation by
2. Basis for Apportionment
the public. The locally developed,
FTA allocates funds to the States by
coordinated public transit-human
an administrative formula consisting of
services transportation planning process
a $125,000 floor for each State ($50,000
must be coordinated and consistent
for smaller territories) with the balance
with the metropolitan and statewide
allocated based on 2000 Census
planning processes and funding for the
population data for persons aged 65 and program must included in the
over and for persons with disabilities.
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
3. Requirements
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
Funds are available to support the
or aggregation consistent with State and
capital costs of transportation services
local policies and procedures. Finally,
for older adults and people with
the State must certify that allocations of
disabilities. Uniquely under this
the grant to subrecipients are made on
program, eligible capital costs include
a fair and equitable basis.
the acquisition of service. Seven
The coordinated planning
specified States (Alaska, Louisiana,
requirement is also a requirement in two
Minnesota, North Carolina, Oregon,
additional programs. Projects selected
South Carolina, and Wisconsin) may use for funding under the Job Access
up to 33 percent of their apportionment Reverse Commute program and the New
for operating assistance under the terms Freedom program are also required to be
of the SAFETEA–LU Section 3012(b)
derived from a locally developed
pilot program.
coordinated public transit/human
Capital assistance is provided on an
service transportation plan. FTA
80 percent Federal, 20 percent local
anticipates that most areas will develop
matching basis except that Section
one consolidated plan for all the
5310(c) allows States eligible for a
programs, which may include separate
higher match under the sliding scale for elements and other human service
FHWA programs to use that match ratio transportation programs.
for Section 5310 capital projects.
The Section 5310 program is subject
Operating assistance is 50 percent
to the requirements of Section 5307 to
Federal, 50 percent local. Funds
the extent the Secretary determines
provided under other Federal programs
appropriate. Program guidance is found
(other than those of the DOT, with the
in FTA C 9070.1F, dated May 1, 2007.
exception of the Federal Lands Highway The circular is posted on the FTA Web
Program established by 23 U.S.C. 204)
site at https://www.fta.dot.gov.
may be used as match. Revenue from
4. Period of Availability
service contracts may also be used as
local match.
FTA has administratively established
While the assistance is intended
a three year period of availability for
primarily for private non-profit
Section 5310 funds. Funds allocated to
organizations, public bodies approved
States under the Elderly and Individuals
by the State to coordinate services for
with Disabilities Program in this notice
the elderly and individuals with
must be obligated by September 30,
disabilities, or any public body that
2011. Any funding that remains
certifies to the State that there are no
unobligated as of that date will revert to
non-profit organizations in the area that FTA for reapportionment among the
are readily available to carry out the
States under the Elderly and Individuals
service, may receive these funds.
with Disabilities Program.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
After deduction of 0.5 percent for
oversight, and the addition of
reapportioned prior year funds,
$54,349,586 remains available for
allocation to the States.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
States may transfer Section 5310
funds to Section 5307 or Section 5311,
but only for projects selected under the
Section 5310 program, not as a general
supplement for those programs. FTA
anticipates that the States would use
this flexibility primarily for projects to
be implemented by a Section 5307
recipient in a small urbanized area, or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes
that elect to receive funds as a direct
recipient from FTA under Section 5311.
A State that transfers Section 5310
funds to Section 5307 must certify that
each project for which the funds are
transferred has been coordinated with
private nonprofit providers of services.
FTA has established a scope code (641)
to track 5310 projects included within a
Section 5307 or 5311 grant. Transfer to
Section 5307 or 5311 is permitted but
not required. FTA expects primarily to
award stand-alone Section 5310 grants
to the State for any and all
subrecipients.
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311)
This program provides formula
funding to States and Indian Tribes for
the purpose of supporting public
transportation in areas with a
population of less than 50,000. Funding
may be used for capital, operating, State
administration, and project
administration expenses. Eligible
subrecipients include State and local
public agencies, Indian Tribes, private
non-profit organizations, and private
operators of public transportation
services, including intercity bus
companies. Indian Tribes are also
eligible direct recipients under Section
5311, both for funds apportioned to the
States and for projects selected to be
funded with funds set aside for a
separate Tribal Transit Program.
For more information about the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
contact Lorna Wilson, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $188,383,800 to the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program
(49 U.S.C. 5311). The total amount
apportioned for the Nonurbanized Area
Formula Program is $208,147,062, after
take-downs of two percent for the Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP), 0.5 percent for oversight, and
$5,161,200 for the Tribal Transit
Program, and the addition of Section
5340 funds and prior year funds
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77355
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
reapportioned, as shown in the table
below.
NONURBANIZED AREA FORMULA
PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...............
Oversight Deduction .............
RTAP Takedown ..................
Tribal Transit Takedown .......
Section 5340 Funds Added ..
$188,383,800
¥941,919
¥3,767,676
¥5,161,200
29,634,057
Total Apportioned ..............
208,147,062
The FY 2009 Nonurbanized Area
Formula apportionments to the States
are displayed in Table 14.
2. Basis for Apportionments
FTA apportions the funds available
for apportionment after take-down for
oversight, the Tribal Transit Program,
and RTAP according to a statutory
formula. FTA apportions the first
twenty percent to the States based on
land area in nonurbanized areas with no
state receiving more than 5 percent of
the amount apportioned. FTA
apportions the remaining eighty percent
based on nonurbanized population of
each State relative to the national
nonurbanized population. FTA does not
apportion Section 5311 funds to the
Virgin Islands, which by a statutory
exception are treated as an urbanized
area for purposes of the Section 5307
formula program.
FTA is allocating $29,634,057 to the
50 States for nonurbanized areas from
the Growing States portion of Section
5340. FTA apportions Growing States
funds by a formula based on State
population forecasts for 15 years beyond
the most recent census. FTA distributes
the amounts apportioned for each State
between UZAs and nonurbanized areas
based on the ratio of urbanized/
nonurbanized population within each
State in the 2000 census.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
3. Program Requirements
The Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program provides capital, operating and
administrative assistance for public
transit service in nonurbanized areas
under 50,000 in population.
The Federal share for capital
assistance is 80 percent and for
operating assistance is 50 percent,
except that States eligible for the sliding
scale match under FHWA programs may
use that match ratio for Section 5311
capital projects and 62.5 percent of the
sliding scale capital match ratio for
operating projects.
Each State must spend no less than 15
percent of its FY 2009 Nonurbanized
Area Formula apportionment for the
development and support of intercity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
bus transportation, unless the State
certifies, after consultation with affected
intercity bus service providers, that the
intercity bus service needs of the State
are being adequately met. FTA also
encourages consultation with other
stakeholders, such as communities
affected by loss of intercity service.
Each State prepares an annual
program of projects, which must
provide for fair and equitable
distribution of funds within the States,
including Indian reservations, and must
provide for maximum feasible
coordination with transportation
services assisted by other Federal
sources.
In order to retain eligibility for
funding, recipients of Section 5311
funding must report data annually to the
NTD.
Program guidance for the
Nonurbanized Area Formula Program is
found in FTA C 9040.1F, Nonurbanized
Area Formula Program Guidance and
Grant Application Instructions, dated
April 1, 2007, which was revised and
reissued after notice and comment. The
circular is posted at https://
www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
Funds apportioned to nonurbanized
areas under the Nonurbanized Area
Formula Program during FY 2009 will
remain available for two additional
fiscal years after the year of
apportionment. Any funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on
September 30, 2011, will revert to FTA
for allocation among the States under
the Nonurbanized Area Formula
Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. NTD Reporting. By law, FTA
requires that each recipient under the
Section 5311 program submit an annual
report to the NTD containing
information on capital investments,
operations, and service provided with
funds received under the Section 5311
program. Section 5311(b)(4), as
amended by SAFETEA–LU, specifies
that the report should include
information on total annual revenue,
sources of revenue, total annual
operating costs, total annual capital
costs, fleet size and type, and related
facilities, revenue vehicle miles, and
ridership. State or Territorial DOT 5311
grant recipients must complete a onepage form of basic data for each 5311
subrecipient, unless the subrecipient is
already providing a full report to the
NTD as a Tribal Transit direct recipient
or as an urbanized area reporter
(without receiving a Nine or Fewer
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Vehicles Waiver). For the 2008 Report
Year State or Territorial DOTs must
report on behalf of any subrecipient
receiving Section 5311 grants in 2008,
or that continued to benefit in 2008
from capital assets purchased using
Section 5311 grants. Tribal Transit
direct recipients must report if they
received an obligation or an outlay for
a Section 5311 grant in 2008, or if they
continued to benefit in 2008 from
capital assets using Section 5311 Grants,
unless the Tribe is already filing a full
NTD Reports as an urbanized area
reporter or unless the Tribe only
received $50,000 or less in planning
grants. The NTD Rural Reporting
Manual contains detailed reporting
instructions and is posted on the NTD
Web site, https://www.ntdprogram.gov.
b. Extension of Intercity Bus Pilot of
In-Kind Match. Beginning in FY 2007,
FTA implemented a two year pilot
program of in-kind match for intercity
bus service. The initial program was set
to expire after FY 2008; however, FTA
decided to extend the program through
FY 2009. FTA published guidance on
the in-kind match pilot in the Federal
Register on February 28, 2007, as
Appendix 1 of the Notice announcing
the final revised circular 9040.1F.
J. Rural Transportation Assistance
Program (49 U.S.C. 5311(b)(3))
This program provides funding to
assist in the design and implementation
of training and technical assistance
projects, research, and other support
services tailored to meet the needs of
transit operators in nonurbanized areas.
For more information about Rural
Transportation Assistance Program
(RTAP) contact Lorna Wilson, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $3,767,676 to RTAP (49
U.S.C. 5311(b)(2)), as a two percent
takedown from the funds appropriated
for Section 5311. FTA has reserved 15
percent for the National RTAP program.
After adding prior year funds eligible for
reapportionment, $3,202,525 is
available for allocations to the States, as
shown in the table below.
RURAL TRANSIT ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM
Total Appropriation ...............
National RTAP Takedown ....
$3,767,676
¥565,151
Total Apportioned ..............
3,202,525
Table 14 shows the FY 2009 RTAP
allocations to the States.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77356
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
2. Basis for Allocation
FTA allocates funds to the States by
an administrative formula. First FTA
allocates $65,000 to each State ($10,000
to territories), and then allocates the
balance based on nonurbanized
population in the 2000 census.
3. Program Requirements
States may use the funds to undertake
research, training, technical assistance,
and other support services to meet the
needs of transit operators in
nonurbanized areas. These funds are to
be used in conjunction with a State’s
administration of the Nonurbanized
Area Formula Program, but may also
support the rural components of the
Section 5310, JARC, and New Freedom
programs.
4. Period of Availability
Funds apportioned to States under
RTAP remain available for two fiscal
years following FY 2009. Any funds that
remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2011, will
revert to FTA for allocation among the
States under the RTAP.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
K. Public Transportation on Indian
Reservations Program (49 U.S.C.
5311(c)(1))
FTA refers to this program as the
Tribal Transit Program. It is funded as
a takedown from funds appropriated for
the Section 5311 program. Federally
recognized Indian Tribes are defined as
eligible direct recipients. The funds are
to be apportioned for grants to Indian
Tribes for any purpose eligible under
Section 5311, which includes capital,
operating, planning, and administrative
assistance for rural public transit
services and rural intercity bus service.
For more information about the Tribal
Transit Program contact Lorna Wilson,
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
1. Funding Availability in FY 2009
Under the Continuing Appropriations
Act, 2009, the amount allocated to the
program in FY 2009 is $5,161,200, as
authorized in Section 5311(c)(1)(C).
2. Basis for Allocation
Based on procedures developed in
consultation with the Tribes, FTA will
issue a Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) soliciting applications for FY
2009 funds.
3. Requirements
FTA developed streamlined program
requirements based on statutory
authority allowing the Secretary to
determine the terms and conditions
appropriate to the program. These
conditions are contained in the annual
NOFA. Beginning with grants awarded
in FY 2009, the grant agreement will
incorporate the statement of warranty
for labor protective arrangements, and
tribal grants will be submitted to the
Department of Labor (DOL) upon FTA
approval.
4. Period of Availability
The National RTAP project is
administered by cooperative agreement
and re-competed at five-year intervals.
In FY 2008, FTA awarded the
cooperative agreement to the Neponset
Valley Transportation Management
Association (NVTMA) located in
Waltham, Massachusetts through a
competitive process. The projects are
guided by a project review board that
consists of managers of rural transit
systems and State DOT RTAP programs.
National RTAP resources also support
the biennial TRB National Conference
on Rural Public and Intercity Bus
Transportation and other research and
technical assistance projects of a
national scope.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–
2053.
Funds remain available for three fiscal
years, which includes the fiscal year the
funds were apportioned or appropriated
plus two additional years. Funds
appropriated in FY 2009 will remain
available for obligation to the tribes
competitively selected to receive the
funds through September 30, 2011. Any
funds that remain unobligated after
September 30, 2011, will revert to FTA
for reallocation among the Tribes.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated allocations
under the Tribal Transit Program in the
amount of $2,876,718 remain available
for obligation in FY 2009. These
unobligated amounts are displayed in
Table 15.
The funds set aside for the Tribal
Transit Program are not meant to
replace or reduce funds that Indian
Tribes receive from states through the
Section 5311 program but are to be used
to enhance public transportation on
Indian reservations and transit serving
tribal communities. Funds allocated to
Tribes by the States may be included in
the State’s Section 5311 application or
awarded by FTA in a grant directly to
the tribe. We encourage Tribes
intending to apply to FTA as direct
recipients to contact the appropriate
FTA regional office at the earliest
opportunity.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Technical assistance for Tribes may
be available from the State DOT using
the State’s allocation of RTAP or funds
available for State administration under
Section 5311, from the Tribal
Transportation Assistance Program
(TTAP) Centers supported by FHWA,
and from the Community
Transportation Association of America
under a program funded by the United
States Department of Agriculture
(USDA). The National RTAP will also be
developing new resources for Tribal
Transit.
L. National Research Programs (49
U.S.C. 5314)
FTA’s National Research Programs
(NRP) include the National Research
and Technology Program (NRTP), the
Transit Cooperative Research Program
(TCRP), the National Transit Institute
(NTI), and the University Transportation
Centers Program (UTC).
Through funding under these
programs, FTA seeks to deliver
solutions that improve public
transportation. FTA’s Strategic Research
Goals are to provide transit research
leadership, increase transit ridership,
improve capital and operating
efficiencies, improve safety and
emergency preparedness, and to protect
the environment and promote energy
independence. For more information
contact Bruce Robinson, Office of
Research, Demonstration and
Innovation, at (202) 366–4209.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2009
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $28,112,583 for the
Research and University Research
Centers Programs. Of this amount
$3,999,930 is allocated for TCRP,
$1,849,430 for NTI, $3,010,700 for the
UTC, and $19,252,523 for NRTP. Within
the NRTP, $22,615,000 is allocated for
specific activities under 49 U.S.C.
5338(d) and in Section 3046 of
SAFETEA–LU, more than the amount
currently available. All research and
research and development projects, as
defined by the Office of Management
and Budget, are subject to a 2.6%
reduction for the Small Business
Innovative Research Program (SBIR). A
project allocation table with the entire
year’s funding will be published in a
subsequent notice.
2. Program Requirements
Application Instructions and Program
Management Guidelines are set forth in
FTA Circular 6100.1C. Research projects
must support FTA’s Strategic Research
Goals and meet the Office of
Management and Budget’s Research and
Development Investment Criteria. All
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
research recipients are required to work
with FTA to develop approved
Statements of Work and plans to
evaluate research results before award.
Eligible activities under the NRTP
include research, development,
demonstration and deployment projects
as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5312(a); Joint
Partnership projects for deployment of
innovation as defined by 49 U.S.C.
5312(b); International Mass
Transportation Projects as defined by 49
U.S.C. 5312(c); and, human resource
programs as defined by 49 U.S.C. 5322.
Unless otherwise specified in law, all
projects must meet one of these
eligibility requirements.
Problem Statements for TCRP can be
submitted on TCRP’s website: https://
www.tcrponline.org. Information about
NTI courses can be found at https://
www.ntionline.com. UTC funds are
transferred to the Research and
Innovative Technology Administration
to make awards.
3. Period of Availability
Funds are available until expended.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Funds not designated by Congress for
specific projects and activities will be
programmed by FTA based on national
priorities. Opportunities are posted in
https://www.grants.gov under Catalogue
of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
20.514.
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute
Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
The Job Access and Reverse Commute
(JARC) program provides formula
funding to States and Designated
Recipients to support the development
and maintenance of job access projects
designed to transport welfare recipients
and low-income individuals to and from
jobs and activities related to their
employment, and for reverse commute
projects designed to transport residents
of UZAs and other than urbanized to
suburban employment opportunities.
For more information about the JARC
program contact David Schneider,
Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–
2053.
Table 16 shows the FY 2009 JARC
apportionments.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of
funds available to UZAs with
populations of 200,000 or more persons
(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for
urbanized areas with populations
ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 persons
(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the
States for rural and small urban areas
with populations of less than 50,000
persons. FTA apportions funds based
upon the number of low income
individuals residing in a State or large
urbanized area, using data from the
2000 Census for individuals below 150
percent of poverty. FTA publishes
apportionments to each State for small
UZAs and for rural and small urban
areas and a single apportionment for
each large UZA.
The Designated Recipient, either for
the State or for a large UZA, is
responsible for further allocating the
funds to specific projects and
subrecipients through a competitive
selection process. If the Governor has
designated more than one recipient of
JARC funds in a large UZA, the
Designated Recipients may agree to
conduct a single competitive selection
process or sub-allocate funds to each
Designated Recipient, based upon a
percentage split agreed upon locally,
and conduct separate competitions.
States may transfer funds between the
small UZA and the nonurbanized
apportionments, if all of the objectives
of JARC are met in the size area the
funds are taken from. States may also
use funds in the small UZA and
nonurbanized area apportionments for
projects anywhere in the State
(including large UZAs) if the State has
established a statewide program for
meeting the objectives of JARC. A State
planning to transfer funds under either
of these provisions should submit a
request to the FTA regional office. FTA
will assign new accounting codes to the
funds before obligating them in a grant.
3. Requirements
States and Designated Recipients
must solicit grant applications and
select projects competitively, based on
1. Funding Availability in FY 2009
application procedures and
requirements established by the
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $67,095,600 for the JARC Designated Recipient, consistent with
the Federal JARC program objectives. In
Program. The total amount apportioned
the case of large UZAs, the area-wide
by formula is shown in the table below.
solicitation shall be conducted in
JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE cooperation with the appropriate
MPO(s).
PROGRAM
Funds are available to support the
planning, capital, and operating costs of
Total Apportioned .................
$67,095,600
transportation services that are eligible
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77357
for funding under the program.
Assistance may be provided for a variety
of transportation services and strategies
directed at assisting welfare recipients
and eligible low-income individuals
address unmet transportation needs,
and to provide reverse commute
services. The transportation services
may be provided by public, non-profit,
or private-for-profit operators. The
Federal share is 80 percent of capital
and planning expenses and 50 percent
of operating expenses. Funds provided
under other Federal programs (other
than those of the DOT, with the
exception of the Federal Lands Highway
Program established by 23 U.S.C. 204)
may be used for local/State match for
funds provided under Section 5316, and
revenue from service contracts may be
used as local match.
States and Designated Recipients may
use up to ten percent of their annual
apportionment for administration,
planning, and to provide technical
assistance. No local share is required for
these program administrative funds.
Funds used under this program for
planning in urbanized areas must be
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The Designated Recipient must certify
that: the projects selected were derived
from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit-human services
transportation plan; and, the plan was
developed through a process that
included representatives of public,
private, and nonprofit transportation
and human services providers and
participation by the public, including
those representing the needs of welfare
recipients and eligible low-income
individuals. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must be included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
or aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
for funding under the Section 5310
program and the New Freedom program
are also required to be derived from a
locally developed coordinated public
transit-human service transportation
plan. FTA anticipates that most areas
will develop one consolidated plan for
all the programs, which may include
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77358
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
separate elements and other human
service transportation programs. The
goal of the coordinated planning process
is not to be an exhaustive document, but
to serve as a tool for planning and
implementing beneficial projects. The
level of effort required to develop the
plan will vary among communities
based on factors such as the availability
of resources. FTA does not approve
coordinated plans.
The JARC program is subject to the
relevant requirements of Section 5307,
including the requirement for
certification of labor protections. JARC
program requirements are published in
FTA circular 9050.1, dated April 1,
2007. The circular and other guidance
including frequently asked questions are
posted on the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
FTA has established a consistent
three-year period of availability for
JARC, New Freedom, and the Section
5310 program, which includes the year
of apportionment plus two additional
years. FY 2009 funding is available
through FY 2011. Any funding that
remains unobligated on September 30,
2011 will revert to FTA for
reapportionment among the States and
large UZAs under the JARC program.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Carryover Earmarks. Table 17 lists
prior year carryover of $7,791,630 for
JARC projects designated by Congress in
FYs 2002–2005. JARC earmarks carried
over from TEA–21 are subject to the
terms and conditions under which they
were originally appropriated, including
the requirement for a 50 percent local
share for both capital and operating
assistance. All projects should be in a
regional JARC Plan as required under
TEA–21 or in the new local coordinated
plan required by the new formula JARC
program. FTA will award a grant for a
designated project upon receipt of a
complete application, but can honor
changes to the original designation only
if so directed by the Appropriations
Committee chairs. FTA intends to
propose that any remaining JARC
Discretionary Program funds be
reallocated in the agency’s FY 2010
budget. Grantees intending to use their
remaining discretionary JARC funds
should obligate funds prior to
September 30, 2009.
b. Designated Recipient. FTA must
have received formal notification from
the Governor or Governor’s designee of
the Designated Recipient for JARC funds
apportioned to a State or large UZA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
before awarding a grant to that area for
JARC projects.
c. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311.
States may transfer JARC funds to
Section 5307 or Section 5311, but only
for projects competitively selected
under the JARC program, not as a
general supplement for those programs.
FTA anticipates that the States would
use this flexibility primarily for projects
to be implemented by a Section 5307
recipient in a small urbanized area or
for Federally recognized Indian Tribes
that elect to receive funds as a direct
recipient from FTA under Section 5311.
FTA has established a scope code (646)
to track JARC projects included within
a Section 5307 or 5311 grant. Transfer
to Section 5307 or 5311 is permitted but
not required. FTA will also award
stand-alone Section 5316 grants to the
State for any and all subrecipients. In
order to track disbursements accurately
against the appropriate program, FTA
will not combine JARC funds with
Section 5307 funds in a single Section
5307 grant, nor will FTA combine JARC
with New Freedom funds in a single
Section 5307 grant.
d. Evaluation. Section 5316(i)(2), of
SAFETEA–LU, requires FTA to conduct
a study to evaluate the effectiveness of
the JARC program. To support the
evaluation, annual GAO reports on the
program, and DOT Performance
Measures, while reducing the burden
grantees previously experienced from
separate reporting required for the JARC
program under TEA–21. FTA has
established a web-based system for
designated recipients to report their
program measures on behalf of
themselves and their subrecipients.
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C.
5317)
SAFETEA–LU established the New
Freedom Program under 49 U.S.C. 5317.
The program purpose is to provide new
public transportation services and
public transportation alternatives
beyond those currently required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) that assist
individuals with disabilities with
transportation, including transportation
to and from jobs and employment
support services. For more information
about the New Freedom program
contact David Schneider, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2009
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $37,633,750 for the New
Freedom Program. The entire amount is
apportioned by formula, as shown in the
table below.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM
Total Apportioned .................
$37,633,750
Table 18 shows the FY 2009 New
Freedom apportionments.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
By law, FTA allocates 60 percent of
funds available to UZAs with
populations of 200,000 or more persons
(large UZAs); 20 percent to the States for
urbanized areas with populations
ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 persons
(small UZAs), and 20 percent to the
States for rural and small urban areas
with populations of less than 50,000
persons. FTA apportions funds based
upon the number of persons with
disabilities over the age of five residing
in a State or large urbanized area, using
data from the 2000 Census. FTA
publishes apportionments to each State
for small UZAs and for rural and small
urban areas and a single apportionment
for each large UZA.
The Designated Recipient, either for
the State or for a large UZA, is
responsible for further allocating the
funds to specific projects and
subrecipients through a competitive
selection process. If the Governor has
designated more than one recipient of
New Freedom funds in a large UZA, the
Designated Recipients may agree to
conduct a single competitive selection
process or sub-allocate funds to each
Designated Recipient, based upon a
percentage split agreed on locally and
conduct separate competitions.
3. Requirements
States and Designated Recipients
must solicit grant applications and
select projects competitively, based on
application procedures and
requirements established by the
Designated Recipient, consistent with
the Federal New Freedom program
objectives. In the case of large UZAs, the
area-wide solicitation shall be
conducted in cooperation with the
appropriate MPO(s).
Funds are available to support the
capital and operating costs of new
public transportation services and
public transportation alternatives that
are beyond those required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Funds
provided under other Federal programs
(other than those of the DOT, with the
exception of the Federal Lands Highway
Program established by 23 U.S.C. 204)
may be used as match for capital funds
provided under Section 5317, and
revenue from contract services may be
used as local match.
Funding is available for transportation
services provided by public, non-profit,
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
or private-for-profit operators.
Assistance may be provided for a variety
of transportation services and strategies
directed at assisting persons with
disabilities to address unmet
transportation needs. Eligible public
transportation services and public
transportation alternatives funded under
the New Freedom program must be both
new and beyond the ADA. (In FY 2007,
FTA published interim guidance
holding Designated Recipients harmless
for project selections conducted in good
faith based on FTA’s earlier preliminary
determination that eligible services
could be either new or beyond the ADA.
Grants awarded in FY 2009 are now
subject to the requirements of the final
guidance which was published April 1,
2007).
The Federal share is 80 percent of
capital expenses and 50 percent of
operating expenses. Funds provided
under other Federal programs (other
than those of the DOT) may be used for
local/state match for funds provided
under Section 5317, and revenue from
service contracts may be used as local
match.
States and Designated Recipients may
use up to ten percent of their annual
apportionment to administer, plan, and
provide technical assistance for a
funded project. No local share is
required for these program
administrative funds. Funds used under
this program for planning must be
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with
responsibility for that area.
The Designated Recipient must certify
that: the projects selected were derived
from a locally developed, coordinated
public transit-human services
transportation plan; and, the plan was
developed through a process that
included representatives of public,
private, and nonprofit transportation
and human services providers and
participation by the public, including
those representing the needs of welfare
recipients and eligible low-income
individuals. The locally developed,
coordinated public transit-human
services transportation planning process
must be coordinated and consistent
with the metropolitan and statewide
planning processes and funding for the
program must be included in the
metropolitan and statewide
Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP and STIP) at a level of specificity
or aggregation consistent with State and
local policies and procedures. Finally,
the State must certify that allocations of
the grant to subrecipients are made on
a fair and equitable basis.
The coordinated planning
requirement is also a requirement in two
additional programs. Projects selected
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
for funding under the Section 5310
program and the JARC program are also
required to be derived from a locally
developed coordinated public transithuman service transportation plan. FTA
anticipates that most areas will develop
one consolidated plan for all the
programs, which may include separate
elements and other human service
transportation programs.
The New Freedom program is subject
to the relevant requirements of Section
5307, but certification of labor
protections is not required. New
Freedom Program requirements are
published in FTA circular 9045.1,
which was effective May 1, 2007. The
circular and other guidance including
frequently asked questions are posted
on the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov.
4. Period of Availability
FTA has established a consistent
three-year period of availability for New
Freedom, JARC, and the Section 5310
program, which includes the year of
apportionment plus two additional
years. FY 2009 funding is available
through FY 2011. Any funding that
remains unobligated on September 30,
2011, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment among the States and
large UZAs under the New Freedom
program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
a. Designated Recipient. FTA must
have received formal notification from
the Governor or Governor’s designee of
the Designated Recipient for New
Freedom funds apportioned to a State or
large UZA before awarding a grant to
that area for New Freedom projects.
b. Transfers to Section 5307 or 5311.
States may transfer New Freedom funds
to Section 5307 or Section 5311, but
only for projects competitively selected
under the New Freedom program, not as
a general supplement for those
programs. FTA anticipates that the
States would use this flexibility for
projects to be implemented by a Section
5307 recipient in a small urbanized area
or for Federally recognized Indian
Tribes that elect to receive funds as a
direct recipient from FTA under Section
5311. FTA has established a scope code
(647) to track New Freedom projects
included within a Section 5307 or 5311
grant. Transfer to Section 5307 or 5311
is permitted but not required. FTA will
also award stand-alone Section 5317
grants to the State for any and all
subrecipients. In order to track
disbursements accurately against the
appropriate program, FTA will not
combine New Freedom funds with
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77359
Section 5307 funds in a single Section
5307 grant, nor will FTA combine New
Freedom with JARC funds in a single
Section 5307 grant.
c. Performance Measures. To support
the evaluation of the program and
Departmental reporting under the
Governmental Performance and Results
Act and the Office of Management and
Budget’s Performance Assessment and
Rating Tool, FTA has established a webbased system for designated recipients
to report their program measures on
behalf of themselves and their
subrecipients.
O. Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks
Program (49 U.S.C. 5320)
The Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks
Program (Transit in Parks Program),
formally the Alternative Transportation
in Parks and Public Lands (ATPPL)
program, is administered by FTA in
partnership with the Department of the
Interior (DOI) and the U.S. Department
of Agriculture’s Forest Service. The
purpose of the program is to enhance
the protection of national parks and
Federal lands, and increase the
enjoyment of those visiting them. The
program funds capital and planning
expenses for alternative transportation
systems such as buses and trams in
federally-managed parks and public
lands. Federal land management
agencies and State, tribal and local
governments acting with the consent of
a Federal land management agency are
eligible to apply.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, makes $10,752,500 available for
the program in FY 2009. Up to ten
percent of the funds may be reserved for
planning, research, and technical
assistance. FTA will publish a Notice of
Funding Availability (NOFA) in the
Federal Register inviting applications
for projects to be funded in FY 2009.
2. Program Requirements
Projects are competitively selected
based on criteria specified in the Notice
of Funding Availability. The terms and
conditions applicable to the program are
also specified in the NOFA. Projects
must conserve natural, historical, and
cultural resources, reduce congestion
and pollution, and improve visitor
mobility and accessibility. No more than
25 percent may be allocated for any one
project.
3. Period of Availability
The funds under the Transit in Parks
Program remain available until
expended.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77360
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Project selections for the FY 2008
funding were published in the Federal
Register on October 10, 2008. Fifty-two
projects totaling $24,470,501 were
awarded.
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339)
The Alternatives Analysis Program
provides grants to States, authorities of
the States, metropolitan planning
organizations, and local government
authorities to develop studies as part of
the transportation planning process.
These studies include an assessment of
a wide range of public transportation
alternatives designed to address a
transportation problem in a corridor or
subarea; sufficient information to enable
the Secretary to make the findings of
project justification and local financial
commitment required; the selection of a
locally preferred alternative; and the
adoption of the locally preferred
alternative as part of the state or
regional long-range transportation plan.
For more information about this
program contact Ron Fisher, Office of
Planning and Environment, at (202)
366–4033.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $10,619,642 to the
Alternatives Analysis Program (49
U.S.C. 5339). FTA will publish project
allocations in a supplemental notice
when all program funds have been made
available.
2. Requirements
Alternatives Analysis program funds
may be made available to States,
authorities of the States, metropolitan
planning organizations, and local
governmental authorities. The
Government’s share of the cost of an
activity funded may not exceed 80
percent of the cost of the activity. The
funds will be awarded as separate
Section 5339 grants. The grant
requirements will be comparable to
those for Section 5309 grants. Eligible
projects include planning and corridor
studies and the adoption of locally
preferred alternatives within the fiscally
constrained Metropolitan
Transportation Plan for that area. Funds
awarded under the Alternatives
Analysis Program must be shown in the
UPWP for MPO(s) with responsibility
for that area. Pre-award authority
applies to these funds after Congress
appropriates funds for these projects
and the allocations are published in an
FTA notice of apportionments and
allocations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
Legislation to amend a 2007 or 2008
earmark under section 3037(c) of
SAFETEA–LU is necessary should a
recipient wish to use section 5339 funds
for eligible project activities outside the
scope of the project description. Unless
otherwise specified in law, grants made
under the Alternatives Analysis
program must meet all other eligibility
requirements as outlined in Section
5309.
3. Period of Availability
Funds designated for specific
Alternatives Analysis Program projects
remain available for obligation for three
fiscal years, which includes the year of
availability plus two additional fiscal
years. Alternatives Analysis funds not
obligated in an FTA grant for eligible
purposes at the end of the period of
availability will generally be made
available for other projects.
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
Table 19 lists prior year carryover of
$23,481,600 for Alternatives Analysis
projects allocated project funding in FY
2007 and FY 2008. This amount
includes $480,000 for FY 2006, which
was competitively awarded in FY 2007.
The total carryover amount also
includes $8,987,600 from FY 2007 and
$14,014,000 from FY 2008.
The SAFETEA–LU Technical
Corrections Act of 2008 rescinded FY
2006 and FY 2007 funding in the
amount of $500,000 for the Middle Rio
Grande Coalition of Governments,
Albuquerque to Santa Fe Corridor
Study. Funding for the Lane County,
Oregon Bus Rapid Transit Phase II
Corridor Study is now available to all
phases of the project.
Q. Growing States and High Density
States Formula Factors
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, makes $188,383,800 available for
apportionment in accordance with the
formula factors prescribed for Growing
States and High Density States in
Section 5340 of SAFETEA–LU. Fifty
percent of this amount (or $94,191,900)
is apportioned to eligible States and
urbanized areas using the Growing State
formula factors. The other 50 percent is
apportioned to eligible States and
urbanized areas using the High Density
States formula factors. Based on
application of the formulas, $64,557,843
of the Growing States funding was
apportioned to urbanized areas and
$29,634,057 to nonurbanized areas. All
of the $94,191,900 allotted to High
Density States was apportioned to
urbanized areas.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
The term ‘State’ is defined only to
mean the 50 States. For the Growing
State portion of Section 5340, funds are
allocated based on the population
forecasts for fifteen years after the date
of that census. Forecasts are based on
the trend between the most recent
decennial census and Census Bureau
population estimates for the most
current year. Census population
estimates as of December 27, 2007 were
used in the FY 2009 apportionments
Funds allocated to the States are then
sub-allocated to urbanized and nonurbanized areas based on forecast
population, where available. If
forecasted population data at the
urbanized level is not available, as is
currently the case, funds are allocated to
current urbanized and non-urbanized
areas on the basis of current population
in the 2000 Census. Funds allocated to
urbanized areas are included in their
Section 5307 apportionment. Funds
allocated for non-urbanized areas are
included in the states’ Section 5311
apportionments.
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note)
The Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
(OTRB) Program authorizes FTA to
make grants to operators of over-theroad buses to help finance the
incremental capital and training costs of
complying with the DOT over-the-road
bus accessibility final rule, 49 CFR Part
37, published on September 28, 1998
(63 FR 51670). FTA conducts a national
solicitation of applications, and grantees
are selected on a competitive basis. For
more information about the OTRB
program contact Blenda Younger, Office
of Transit Programs, at (202) 366–2053.
1. Funding Availability in FY 2009
The Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009, provides $3,569,830 for the Overthe-Road Bus Accessibility (OTRB)
Program, which is the total amount
allocable for OTRB, as shown in the
table below.
OVER-THE-ROAD BUS ACCESSIBILITY
PROGRAM
Total Apportioned .................
$3,569,830
Of this amount, $2,677,373 is
allocable to providers of intercity fixedroute service, and $892,457 to other
providers of over-the-road bus services,
including local fixed-route service,
commuter service, and charter and tour
service.
2. Program Requirements
Projects are competitively selected.
The Federal share of the project is 90
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
percent of net project cost. Program
guidance is provided in the Federal
Register notice soliciting applications.
Assistance under the program is
available to private operators of overthe-road buses that are used
substantially or exclusively in intercity,
fixed route and over-the-road bus
service. Assistance is also available to
private operators of over-the-road buses
in other services, such as charter, tour,
and commuter service. Capital projects
eligible for funding include projects to
add lifts and other accessibility
components to new vehicle purchases
and to purchase lifts to retrofit existing
vehicles. Eligible training costs include
developing training materials or
providing training for local providers of
over-the-road bus services. A
comprehensive listing of program
requirements is published annually in
the OTRB Program Notice of Funding
Availability (NOFA).
3. Period of Availability
FTA has observed that some private
operators selected to receive funding
under this program have not acted
promptly to obligate the funds in a grant
and request reimbursement for
expenditures. While the program does
not have a statutory period of
availability, in the FY 2008
Apportionment Notice, FTA published
its intention to limit the period of
availability to a selected operator to
three years, which includes the year of
allocation plus two additional years.
Accordingly, funds for projects selected
in FY 2005 or prior years are no longer
available for obligation in a grant and
will be reallocated in the FY 2009
competition. FY 2006 funds will be
reallocated at the end of FY 2009 if not
obligated in a grant by September 30,
2009. FY 2007 and FY 2008 funds were
allocated on August 22, 2008 and will
be reallocated if not obligated in a grant
by September 30, 2010. Funds for
project selections announced in FY
2009 will be reallocated if not obligated
in a grant by September 30, 2011.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
4. Other Program or Apportionment
Related Information and Highlights
FTA will publish a NOFA soliciting
applications for FY 2009 in a
subsequent notice once the full funding
level is made available to the program.
The notice will be available at https://
www.fta.dot.gov/laws/leg_reg_federal_
register.html.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
V. FTA Policy and Procedures for FY
2009 Grants
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority To
Incur Project Costs
1. Caution to New Grantees and
Grantees Using Innovative Financing
While we provide pre-award authority
to incur expenses prior to grant award
for many projects, we recommend that
first-time grant recipients not utilize this
automatic pre-award authority and wait
until the grant is actually awarded by
FTA before incurring costs. As a new
grantee, it is easy to misunderstand preaward authority conditions and not be
aware of all of the applicable FTA
requirements that must be met in order
to be reimbursed for project
expenditures incurred in advance of
grant award. FTA programs have
specific statutory requirements that are
often different from those for other
Federal grant programs with which new
grantees may be familiar. If funds are
expended for an ineligible project or
activity, FTA will be unable to
reimburse the project sponsor and, in
certain cases, the entire project may be
rendered ineligible for FTA assistance.
Grantees proposing to use innovative
financing techniques or capital leasing
are required to consult with the
applicable FTA Regional Office (see
Appendix A) prior to entering into the
financial agreement—especially where
the grantee expects to use Federal funds
for debt service or capital lease
payments. Consulting with FTA prior to
entering into the agreement allows FTA
to advise the grantee of any applicable
federal regulations, such as the Capital
Leasing Regulation, and will minimize
the risk of the costs being ineligible for
reimbursement at a later date.
2. Policy
FTA provides pre-award authority to
incur expenses prior to grant award for
certain program areas described below.
This pre-award authority allows
grantees to incur certain project costs
prior to grant approval and retain the
eligibility of those costs for subsequent
reimbursement after grant approval. The
grantee assumes all risk and is
responsible for ensuring that all
conditions are met to retain eligibility.
This pre-award spending authority
permits a grantee to incur costs on an
eligible transit capital, operating,
planning, or administrative project
without prejudice to possible future
Federal participation in the cost of the
project. In the Federal Register Notice
of November 30, 2006, FTA extended
pre-award authority for capital
assistance under all formula programs
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77361
through FY 2009, the duration of
SAFETEA–LU. In this notice, FTA
extends pre-award authority through FY
2010 for capital assistance under all
formula programs. FTA provides preaward authority for planning and
operating assistance under the formula
programs without regard to the period of
the authorization. In addition, we
extend pre-award authority for certain
discretionary programs based on the
annual Appropriations Act each year.
All pre-award authority is subject to
conditions and triggers stated below:
a. FTA does not impose additional
conditions on pre-award authority for
operating, planning, or administrative
assistance under the formula grant
programs. Grantees may be reimbursed
for expenses incurred prior to grant
award so long as funds have been
expended in accordance with all
Federal requirements. In addition to
cross-cutting Federal grant
requirements, program specific
requirements must be met. For example,
a planning project must have been
included in a Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP); a New Freedom
operating assistance project or a JARC
planning or operating project must have
been derived from a coordinated public
transit-human services transportation
plan (coordinated plan) and
competitively selected by the
Designated Recipient prior to incurring
expenses; expenditure on State
Administration expenses under State
Administered programs must be
consistent with the State Management
Plan. Designated Recipients for JARC
and New Freedom have pre-award
authority for the ten percent of the
apportionment they may use for
program administration, if the use is
consistent with their Program
Management Plan.
b. Pre-Award authority for
Alternatives Analysis planning projects
under 49 U.S.C. 5339 is triggered by the
publication of the allocation in FTA’s
Federal Register Notice of
Apportionments and Allocations
following the annual Appropriations
Act, or announcement of additional
discretionary allocations. The projects
must be included in the UPWP of the
MPO for that metropolitan area.
c. Pre-award authority for design and
environmental work on a capital project
is triggered by the authorization of
formula funds, or the appropriation of
funds for a discretionary project.
d. Following authorization of formula
funds or appropriation and publication
of discretionary projects, pre-award
authority for capital project
implementation activities including
property acquisition, demolition,
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77362
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
construction, and acquisition of
vehicles, equipment, or construction
materials is triggered by completion of
the environmental review process with
FTA’s concurrence in the categorical
exclusion (CE) determination or signing
of an environmental Record of Decision
(ROD) or Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI). Prior to exercising preaward authority, grantees must comply
with the conditions and Federal
requirements outlined in paragraph 3
below. Failure to do so will render an
otherwise eligible project ineligible for
FTA financial assistance. Capital
projects under the Section 5310, JARC,
and New Freedom programs must
comply with specific program
requirements, including coordinated
planning and competitive selection. In
addition, prior to incurring costs,
grantees are strongly encouraged to
consult with the appropriate FTA
regional office regarding the eligibility
of the project for future FTA funds and
the applicability of the conditions and
Federal requirements.
e. As a general rule, pre-award
authority applies to the Section 5309
Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities, the Clean Fuels Bus program,
high priority project designations, and
any other transit discretionary projects
designated in SAFETEA–LU only
AFTER funds have been appropriated.
Pre-award authority is currently
extended for FY 2007 and FY 2008
discretionary project funding. As of the
date of this notice, FTA extends
preaward authority to FY 2009 projects
designated discretionary funding in
SAFETEA–LU and to discretionary
allocations extended or reprogrammed
under the SAFETEA–LU Technical
Corrections Act of 2008, as of June 6,
2008. For Section 5309 Capital
Investment Bus and Bus-Related, Clean
Fuels Program, or other transit capital
discretionary projects such as those
designated in an annual Appropriations
Act, the date that costs may be incurred
is: (1) For design and environmental
review, the appropriations bill which
funds the project was enacted; and (2)
for property acquisition, demolition,
construction, and acquisition of
vehicles, equipment, or construction
materials, the date that FTA approves
the document (ROD, FONSI, or CE
determination) that completes the
environmental review process required
by the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) and its implementing
regulations. FTA introduced this new
trigger for pre-award authority in FY
2006 in recognition of the growing
prevalence of new grantees unfamiliar
with Federal and FTA requirements to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
ensure FTA’s continued ability to
comply with NEPA and related
environmental laws. Because FTA does
not sign a final NEPA document until
MPO and statewide planning
requirements (including air quality
conformity requirements, if applicable)
have been satisfied, this new trigger for
pre-award will ensure compliance with
both planning and environmental
requirements prior to irreversible action
by the grantee.
f. In previous notices, FTA extended
pre-award authority to Section 330
projects referenced in the DOT
Appropriation Act, 2002, and the
Consolidated Appropriations
Resolution, 2003 and to those surface
transportation projects commonly
referred to as Section 115 projects
administered by FTA, for which
amounts were provided in the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004,
Section 117 projects in the 2005
Appropriations Act, and Section 112 of
the 2006 Appropriations Act that are to
be administered by FTA. FTA, in the FY
2008 Apportionment Notice, extended
pre-award authority to high priority
projects in SAFETEA–LU, as of the date
they were transferred or allotted to FTA
for administration. The same conditions
described for bus projects apply to these
projects. We strongly encourage any
prospective applicant that does not have
a previous relationship with FTA to
review Federal grant requirements with
the FTA regional office before incurring
costs.
g. Blanket pre-award authority does
not apply to Section 5309 Capital
Investment New Starts funds. Specific
instances of pre-award authority for
Capital Investment New Starts projects
are described in paragraph 4 below. Preaward authority does not apply to
Capital Investment Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities or Clean Fuels projects
authorized for funding beyond this
fiscal year. Before an applicant may
incur costs for Capital Investment New
Starts projects, Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities projects, or any other projects
not yet published in a notice of
apportionments and allocations, it must
first obtain a written Letter of No
Prejudice (LONP) from FTA. To obtain
an LONP, a grantee must submit a
written request accompanied by
adequate information and justification
to the appropriate FTA regional office,
as described below.
h. Blanket pre-award authority does
not apply to Section 5314 National
Research Programs. Before an applicant
may incur costs for National Research
Programs, it must first obtain a written
Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) from
FTA. To obtain an LONP, a grantee must
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
submit a written request accompanied
by adequate information and
justification to the appropriate FTA
headquarters office. Information about
LONP procedures may be obtained from
the appropriate headquarters office.
3. Conditions
The conditions under which preaward authority may be utilized are
specified below:
a. Pre-award authority is not a legal or
implied commitment that the subject
project will be approved for FTA
assistance or that FTA will obligate
Federal funds. Furthermore, it is not a
legal or implied commitment that all
items undertaken by the applicant will
be eligible for inclusion in the project.
b. All FTA statutory, procedural, and
contractual requirements must be met.
c. No action will be taken by the
grantee that prejudices the legal and
administrative findings that the Federal
Transit Administrator must make in
order to approve a project.
d. Local funds expended by the
grantee pursuant to and after the date of
the pre-award authority will be eligible
for credit toward local match or
reimbursement if FTA later makes a
grant or grant amendment for the
project. Local funds expended by the
grantee prior to the date of the preaward authority will not be eligible for
credit toward local match or
reimbursement. Furthermore, the
expenditure of local funds on activities
such as land acquisition, demolition, or
construction prior to the date of preaward authority for those activities (i.e.,
the completion of the NEPA process)
would compromise FTA’s ability to
comply with Federal environmental
laws and may render the project
ineligible for FTA funding.
e. The Federal amount of any future
FTA assistance awarded to the grantee
for the project will be determined on the
basis of the overall scope of activities
and the prevailing statutory provisions
with respect to the Federal/local match
ratio at the time the funds are obligated.
f. For funds to which the pre-award
authority applies, the authority expires
with the lapsing of the fiscal year funds.
g. When a grant for the project is
subsequently awarded, the Financial
Status Report, in TEAM-Web, must
indicate the use of pre-award authority.
h. Environmental, Planning, and
Other Federal Requirements.
All Federal grant requirements must
be met at the appropriate time for the
project to remain eligible for Federal
funding. The growth of the Federal
transit program has resulted in a
growing number of inexperienced
grantees who make compliance with
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
Federal planning and environmental
laws increasingly challenging. FTA has
therefore modified its approach to preaward authority to use the completion
of the NEPA process, which has as a
prerequisite the completion of planning
and air quality requirements, as the
trigger for pre-award authority for all
activities except design and
environmental review.
i. The requirement that a project be
included in a locally adopted
metropolitan transportation plan, the
metropolitan transportation
improvement program and Federallyapproved statewide transportation
improvement program (23 CFR Part 450)
must be satisfied before the grantee may
advance the project beyond planning
and preliminary design with nonFederal funds under pre-award
authority. If the project is located within
an EPA-designated non-attainment area
for air quality, the conformity
requirements of the Clean Air Act, 40
CFR Part 93, must also be met before the
project may be advanced into
implementation-related activities under
pre-award authority. Compliance with
NEPA and other environmental laws
and executive orders (e.g., protection of
parklands, wetlands, and historic
properties) must be completed before
State or local funds are spent on
implementation activities, such as site
preparation, construction, and
acquisition, for a project that is expected
to be subsequently funded with FTA
funds. The grantee may not advance the
project beyond planning and
preliminary design before FTA has
determined the project to be a
categorical exclusion, or has issued a
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) or an environmental Record of
Decision (ROD), in accordance with
FTA environmental regulations, 23 CFR
Part 771. For planning projects, the
project must be included in a locallyapproved Unified Planning Work
Program (UPWP) that has been
coordinated with the State.
j. In addition, Federal procurement
procedures, as well as the whole range
of applicable Federal requirements (e.g.,
Buy America, Davis-Bacon Act,
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise)
must be followed for projects in which
Federal funding will be sought in the
future. Failure to follow any such
requirements could make the project
ineligible for Federal funding. In short,
this increased administrative flexibility
requires a grantee to make certain that
no Federal requirements are
circumvented through the use of preaward authority. If a grantee has
questions or concerns regarding the
environmental requirements, or any
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
other Federal requirements that must be
met before incurring costs, it should
contact the appropriate regional office.
4. Pre-Award Authority for New Starts
Projects
a. Preliminary Engineering (PE) and
Final Design (FD). Projects proposed for
Section 5309 New Starts funds are
required to follow a Federally defined
New Starts project development
process. This New Starts process
includes, among other things, FTA
approval of the entry of the project into
PE and into FD. In accordance with
Section 5309(d), FTA considers the
merits of the project, the strength of its
financial plan, and its readiness to enter
the next phase in deciding whether or
not to approve entry into PE or FD.
Upon FTA approval to enter PE, FTA
extends pre-award authority to incur
costs for PE activities. Upon FTA
approval to enter FD, FTA extends preaward authority to incur costs for FD
activities. The pre-award authority for
each phase is automatic upon FTA’s
signing of a letter to the project sponsor
approving entry into that phase. PE and
FD are defined in the New Starts
regulation entitled Major Capital
Investment Projects, found at 49 CFR
Part 611.
b. Real Property Acquisition
Activities. FTA extends automatic preaward authority for the acquisition of
real property and real property rights for
a New Starts project upon completion of
the NEPA process for that project. The
NEPA process is completed when FTA
signs an environmental Record of
Decision (ROD) or Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), or makes a
Categorical Exclusion (CE)
determination. With the limitations and
caveats described below, real estate
acquisition for a New Starts project may
commence, at the project sponsor’s risk,
upon completion of the NEPA process.
For FTA-assisted projects, any
acquisition of real property or real
property rights must be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act (URA)
and its implementing regulations, 49
CFR Part 24. This pre-award authority is
strictly limited to costs incurred: (i) To
acquire real property and real property
rights in accordance with the URA
regulation, and (ii) to provide relocation
assistance in accordance with the URA
regulation. This pre-award authority is
limited to the acquisition of real
property and real property rights that
are explicitly identified in the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS),
environmental assessment (EA), or CE
document, as needed for the selected
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77363
alternative that is the subject of the
FTA-signed ROD or FONSI, or CE
determination. This pre-award authority
does not cover site preparation,
demolition, or any other activity that is
not strictly necessary to comply with
the URA, with one exception. That
exception is when a building that has
been acquired, has been emptied of its
occupants, and awaits demolition poses
a potential fire-safety hazard or other
hazard to the community in which it is
located, or is susceptible to
reoccupation by vagrants. Demolition of
the building is also covered by this preaward authority upon FTA’s written
agreement that the adverse condition
exists.
Pre-award authority for property
acquisition is also provided when FTA
makes a CE determination for a
protective buy or hardship acquisition
in accordance with 23 CFR
771.117(d)(12), and when FTA makes a
CE determination for the acquisition of
a pre-existing railroad right-of-way in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5324(c).
When a tiered environmental review in
accordance with 23 CFR 771.111(g) is
being used, pre-award authority is not
provided upon completion of the firsttier environmental document except
when the Tier-1 ROD or FONSI signed
by FTA explicitly provides such preaward authority for a particular
identified acquisition.
Project sponsors should use preaward authority for real property
acquisition and relocation assistance
very carefully, with a clear
understanding that it does not constitute
a funding commitment by FTA. FTA
provides pre-award authority upon
completion of the NEPA process to
maximize the time available to project
sponsors to move people out of their
homes and places of business, in
accordance with the requirements of the
Uniform Relocation Act, but also with
maximum sensitivity to the plight of the
people so affected. Although FTA
provides pre-award authority for
property acquisition upon completion of
the NEPA process, FTA will not make
a grant to reimburse the sponsor for real
estate activities conducted under preaward authority until the project has
been approved into FD. Even if funds
have been appropriated for the project,
the timing of an actual grant for
property acquisition and related
activities must await FD approval to
ensure that Federal funds are not risked
on a project whose advancement beyond
PE is still not yet assured.
c. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Activities. NEPA requires that
major projects proposed for FTA
funding assistance be subjected to a
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77364
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
public and interagency review of the
need for the project, its environmental
and community impacts, and
alternatives to avoid and reduce adverse
impacts. Projects of more limited scope
also need a level of environmental
review, either to support an FTA finding
of no significant impact (FONSI) or to
demonstrate that the action is
categorically excluded from the more
rigorous level of NEPA review.
FTA’s regulation titled
‘‘Environmental Impact and Related
Procedures,’’ at 23 CFR Part 771 states
that the costs incurred by a grant
applicant for the preparation of
environmental documents requested by
FTA are eligible for FTA financial
assistance (23 CFR 771.105(e)).
Accordingly, FTA extends pre-award
authority for costs incurred to comply
with NEPA regulations and to conduct
NEPA-related activities for a proposed
New Starts or Small Starts project,
effective as of the date of the Federal
approval of the relevant STIP or STIP
amendment that includes the project or
any phase of the project. NEPA-related
activities include, but are not limited to,
public involvement activities, historic
preservation reviews, section 4(f)
evaluations, wetlands evaluations,
endangered species consultations, and
biological assessments. This pre-award
authority is strictly limited to costs
incurred to conduct the NEPA process,
and to prepare environmental, historic
preservation and related documents. It
does not cover PE activities beyond
those necessary for NEPA compliance.
For many FTA programs, costs
incurred by a grant applicant exercising
pre-award authority in the preparation
of environmental documents required
by FTA are eligible for FTA
reimbursement (See also 23 CFR
771.105(e)). FTA assistance for
environmental documents for New
Starts and Small Starts projects,
however, is subject to certain
restrictions. Under SAFETEA–LU,
Section 5309 New Starts funds cannot
be used for any activity, including a
NEPA-related activity that occurs prior
to the approval of a New Starts project
into PE or a Small Starts project into
Project Development (PD). Section 5339
(Alternatives analysis program), Section
5307 (Urbanized Area Formula Program)
and flexible highway funds are available
for NEPA work conducted prior to PE
approval (for New Starts) or PD
approval (for Small Starts). Section 5309
New Starts funds, however, as well as
Section 5307 (Urban Formula program)
and flexible highway funds, can be used
for NEPA work conducted after PE
approval (for New Starts) or PD
approval (for Small Starts). NEPA-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
related activities include, but are not
limited to, public involvement
activities, historic preservation reviews,
section 4(f) evaluations, wetlands
evaluations, endangered species
consultations, and biological
assessments. As with any pre-award
authority, FTA reimbursement for costs
incurred is not guaranteed.
d. Other New Starts Activities
Requiring Letter of No Prejudice
(LONP). Except as discussed in
paragraphs a through c above, a grant
applicant must obtain a written LONP
from FTA before incurring costs for any
activity expected to be funded by New
Start funds not yet awarded. To obtain
an LONP, an applicant must submit a
written request accompanied by
adequate information and justification
to the appropriate FTA regional office,
as described in B below.
5. Pre-Award Authority for Small Starts
When FTA issues a Project
Development approval letter for a Small
Starts project, FTA grants pre-award
authority for the engineering and design
activities necessary to complete NEPA.
Upon FTA’s issuance of a Record of
Decision (ROD), a Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), or a
Categorical Exclusion (CE)
determination, pre-award authority is
granted to incur costs for all other
project engineering activities including
right-of-way acquisition and utility
relocation. When FTA issues a Project
Construction Grant Agreement (PCGA),
FTA grants pre-award authority for the
construction phase of the project. Preaward authority for NEPA-related work
on a Small Starts project is described in
paragraph 4.c above. Pre-award
authority for real property acquisition
activities for a Small Starts project is
granted under the same conditions and
for the same reasons as for New Starts
projects, as described in paragraph 4.b
above.
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
1. Policy
LONP authority allows an applicant
to incur costs on a project utilizing nonFederal resources, with the
understanding that the costs incurred
subsequent to the issuance of the LONP
may be reimbursable as eligible
expenses or eligible for credit toward
the local match should FTA approve the
project at a later date. LONPs are
applicable to projects and project
activities not covered by automatic preaward authority. The majority of LONPs
will be for Section 5309 New Starts or
Small Starts funds not covered under a
full funding grant agreement (FFGA) or
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
PCGA, or for Section 5309 Bus and BusRelated projects authorized but not yet
appropriated by Congress. LONPs may
be issued for formula and discretionary
funds beyond the life of the current
authorization or FTA’s extension of
automatic pre-award authority;
however, the LONP is limited to a fiveyear period.
2. Conditions and Federal Requirements
The conditions for pre-award
authority specified in section V.A.2
above apply to all LONPs. The
Environmental, Planning and Other
Federal Requirements described in
section V.A.3 also apply to all LONPs.
Because project implementation
activities may not be initiated prior to
NEPA completion, FTA will not issue
an LONP for such activities until the
NEPA process has been completed with
a ROD, FONSI, or Categorical Exclusion
determination.
3. Request for LONP
Before incurring costs for a project not
covered by automatic pre-award
authority, the project sponsor must first
submit a written request for an LONP,
accompanied by adequate information
and justification, to the appropriate
regional office and obtain written
approval from FTA. FTA approval of an
LONP for a New Starts or Small Starts
project is determined on a case-by-case
basis. As a prerequisite to FTA approval
of an LONP for a New Starts or Small
Starts project, FTA will require project
sponsors to demonstrate project
worthiness and readiness that establish
the project as a promising candidate for
an FFGA or PCGA. For New Starts
projects, this usually cannot be
determined prior to the project’s
approval to enter final design. However,
there may be limited instances where
LONP requests prior to entry into final
design are approved, if strongly
justified. Projects will be assessed based
upon the criteria considered in the New
Start evaluation process. Specifically,
when requesting an LONP, the applicant
shall provide sufficient information to
allow FTA to consider the following
items:
a. Description of the activities to be
covered by the LONP.
b. Justification for advancing the
identified activities. The justification
should include an accurate assessment
of the consequences to the project
scope, schedule, and budget should the
LONP not be approved.
c. Data that indicates that the project
will maintain its ability to receive a
rating of ‘‘medium’’, or better and that
its cost-effectiveness rating will be
‘‘medium’’ or better, unless such project
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
has been specifically exempted from
such a requirement.
d. Allocated level of risk and
contingency for the activity requested.
e. Status of procurement progress,
including, if appropriate, submittal of
bids for the activities covered by the
LONP.
f. Strength of the capital and operating
financial plan for the New Starts project
and the future transit system.
g. Adequacy of the Project
Management Plan.
h. Resolution of any readiness issues
that would affect the project, such as
land acquisition and technical capacity
to carry out the project.
C. FTA FY 2009 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances
The full text of the FY 2009
Certifications and Assurances was
published in the Federal Register on
October 31, 2008, and is available on the
FTA Website and in TEAM-Web. The
FY 2009 Certifications and Assurances
must be used for all grants made in FY
2009, including obligation of carryover.
All grantees with active grants are
required to have signed the FY 2009
Certifications and Assurances within 90
days after publication. Any questions
regarding this document may be
addressed to the appropriate Regional
Office or to Nydia Picayo, in the FTA
Office of Program Management, at (202)
366–1662.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit
Purposes
SAFETEA–LU continues provisions
in the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
(ISTEA) and TEA–21 that expanded
modal choice in transportation funding
by including substantial flexibility to
transfer funds between FTA and FHWA
formula program funding categories.
The provisions also allow for transfer of
certain discretionary program funds for
administration of highway projects by
FHWA and transit projects by FTA. FTA
and FHWA execute Flex Funding
Transfers between the Formula and Bus
Grants Transit programs and the Federal
Aid Highway programs. This also
includes the transfer of Metropolitan
and Statewide planning set-aside funds
from FHWA to FTA to be combined
with metropolitan and statewide
planning resources as Consolidated
Planning Grants (CPG). These transfers
are based on States requests to transfer
funding from the Highway and/or
Transit programs to fund States and
local project priorities, and joint
planning needs. This practice can result
in transfers to the Federal Transit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
Program from the Federal Aid Highway
Program or vice versa.
1. Transfer Process for Funds
SAFETEA–LU was enacted on August
10, 2005. With the enactment of
SAFETEA–LU, beginning in FY2006,
Federal transit programs are funded
solely from general funds or trust funds.
The transit formula and bus grant
programs are now funded from MTA of
the Highway Trust Fund. The Formula
and Bus Grant Programs receives flex
funding transfers from the Federal Aid
Highway Program.
As a result of the changes to program
funding mechanisms, there is no longer
a requirement to transfer budget
authority and liquidating cash resources
simultaneously upon the execution of a
flex funding transfer request by a State.
Since the transfers are between trust
fund accounts, the only requirement is
to transfer budget authority (obligation
limitation) between the Federal Aid
Program trust fund account and the
Federal Transit Formula and Bus Grant
Program account. At the point in time
that the obligation resulting from the
transfer of budgetary authority is
expended, a transfer of liquidating cash
will be required.
Beginning in FY 2007, the accounting
process was changed for transfers of flex
funds and other specific programs to
allow budget authority to be transferred
and the cash to be transferred
separately. FTA requires that flexed
fund transfers to FTA be in separate and
identifiable grants in order to ensure
that the draw-down of flexed funds can
be tracked, thus securing the internal
controls for monitoring these resources
from the Federal Highway
Administration to avoid deficiencies in
FTA’s Formula and Bus Grants account.
FTA monitors the expenditures of
flexed funded grants and requests the
transfer of liquidating cash from FHWA
to ensure sufficient funds are available
to meet expenditures. To facilitate
tracking of grantees’ flex funding
expenditures, FTA developed codes to
provide distinct identification of ‘‘flex
funds.’’
The process for transferring flexible
funds between FTA and FHWA
programs is described below. Note that
the new transfer process for ‘‘flex
funds’’ that began in FY 2007 does not
apply to the transfer of State planning
set-aside funds from FHWA to FTA to
be combined with metropolitan and
statewide planning resources as
Consolidated Planning Grants (CPG).
These transfers are based on States
requests to transfer funding from the
Highway and/or Transit programs to
fund States and local project priorities,
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77365
and joint planning needs. Planning
funds transferred will be allowed to be
merged in a single grant with FTA
planning resources using the same
process implemented in FY 2006. For
information on the process for the
transfer of funds between FTA and
FHWA planning programs refer to
section IV.A and B. Note also that
certain prior year appropriations
earmarks (Sections 330, 115, 117, and
112) are allotted annually for
administration rather than being
transferred. For information regarding
these procedures, please contact Kristen
D. Clarke, FTA Budget Office, at (202)
366–1686; or FHWA Budget Division, at
(202) 366–2845.
a. Transfer From FHWA to FTA
FHWA funds transferred to FTA are
used primarily for transit capital
projects and eligible operating activities
that have been designated as part of the
metropolitan and statewide planning
and programming process. The project
must be included in an approved STIP
before the funds can be transferred. By
letter, the State DOT requests the FHWA
Division Office to transfer highway
funds for a transit project. The letter
should specify the project, amount to be
transferred, apportionment year, State,
urbanized area, Federal aid
apportionment category (i.e., Surface
Transportation Program (STP),
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
(CMAQ) or identification of the earmark
and indication of the intended FTA
formula program (i.e., Section 5307,
5311 or 5310) and should include a
description of the project as contained
in the STIP. Note that FTA may also
administer certain transfers of statutory
earmarks under the Section 5309 bus
program, for tracking purposes.
The FHWA Division Office confirms
that the apportionment amount is
available for transfer and concurs in the
transfer, by letter to the State DOT and
FTA. The FHWA Office of Budget and
Finance then transfers obligation
authority. All FHWA, CMAQ, and STP
funds transferred to FTA will be
transferred to one of the three FTA
formula programs (i.e. Urbanized Area
Formula (Section 5307), Nonurbanized
Area Formula (Section 5311) or Elderly
and Persons with Disabilities (Section
5310). High Priority projects in Section
1702 of SAFETEA–LU or Transportation
Improvement projects in Section 1934 of
SAFETEA–LU and other Congressional
earmarks that are transferred to FTA
will be aligned with and administered
through FTA’s discretionary Bus and
Bus Related Facilities Program (Section
5309). The most recent guidance on
transfers of FHWA funds as allowed
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77366
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
under SAFETEA–LU is FHWA
Memorandum, dated July 19, 2007,
‘‘Information Fund Transfers to Other
Agencies and Among Title 23
Programs.’’
The FTA grantee’s application for the
project must specify which program the
funds will be used for, and the
application must be prepared in
accordance with the requirements and
procedures governing that program.
Upon review and approval of the
grantee’s application, FTA obligates
funds for the project.
Transferred funds are treated as FTA
formula or discretionary funds, but are
assigned a distinct identifying code for
tracking purposes. The funds may be
transferred for any capital purpose
eligible under the FTA formula program
to which they are transferred and, in the
case of CMAQ, for certain operating
costs. FHWA issued revised interim
guidance on project eligibility under the
CMAQ program in a Notice at 71 FR
76038 et seq. (December 19, 2006)
incorporating changes made by
SAFETEA–LU. In accordance with 23
U.S.C. 104(k), all FTA requirements
except local share are applicable to
transferred funds except in certain cases
when CMAQ funds are authorized for
operating expenses. Earmarks that are
transferred to the Section 5309 Bus
Program for administration, however,
can be used for the Congressionally
designated transit purposes, and in
some case where the law provides, are
not limited to eligibility under the Bus
Program.
In the event that transferred formula
funds are not obligated for the intended
purpose within the period of availability
of the formula program to which they
were transferred, they become available
to the Governor for any eligible capital
transit project. Earmarked funds,
however, can only be used for the
Congressionally designated purposes.
b. Transfers From FTA to FHWA
The MPO submits a written request to
the FTA regional office for a transfer of
FTA Section 5307 formula funds
(apportioned to a UZA 200,000 and over
in population) to FHWA based on
approved use of the funds for highway
purposes, as determined by the
designated recipient under Section 5307
and contained in the Governor’s
approved State Transportation
Improvement Program. The MPO must
certify that: (1) Notice and opportunity
for comment and appeal has been
provided to affected transit providers;
(2) the funds are not needed for capital
investments required by the Americans
with Disabilities Act, and (3) local
transit needs are being addressed. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
FTA Regional Administrator reviews
and, if he or she concurs in the request,
then forwards the approval in written
format to FTA Headquarters, where a
reduction equal to the dollar amount
being transferred to FHWA is made to
the grantee’s Urbanized Area Formula
Program apportionment.
Transfers of discretionary earmarks
for administration by FHWA are
handled on a case-by-case basis, by the
FTA regional office, in consultation
with the FTA Office of Program
Management, Office of Chief Counsel,
and Office of Budget and Policy.
c. Matching Share for FHWA Transfers
The provisions of Section 104(k) of
title 23 U.S.C., regarding the nonFederal share, apply to Title 23 funds
used for transit projects. Thus, FHWA
funds transferred to FTA retain the same
matching share that the funds would
have if used for highway purposes and
administered by FHWA.
There are four instances in which a
Federal share higher than 80 percent
would be permitted. First, in States with
large areas of Indian and certain public
domain lands and national forests, parks
and monuments, the local share for
highway projects is determined by a
sliding scale rate, calculated based on
the percentage of public lands within
that State. This sliding scale, which
permits a greater Federal share, but not
to exceed 95 percent, is applicable to
transfers used to fund transit projects in
these public land States. FHWA
develops the sliding scale matching
ratios for the increased Federal share.
Second, commuter carpooling and
vanpooling projects and transit safety
projects using FHWA transfers
administered by FTA may retain the
same 100 percent Federal share that
would be allowed for ride-sharing or
safety projects administered by FHWA.
The third instance is the 100 percent
Federally-funded safety projects;
however, these are subject to a
nationwide 10 percent program
limitation.
The fourth instance occurs with
CMAQ funds. H.R. 6, The Energy
Independence and Security Act, 2007,
increased the federal share of CMAQ
projects to 100% at the State’s
discretion. FTA will honor this
increased match for CMAQ funds
transferred to FTA for implementation if
the state chooses to fund the project at
a higher federal share than 80 percent.
The federal share for CMAQ projects
cannot be lower than 80 percent.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
D. Miscellaneous Transit Earmarks in
FHWA Programs
The FY 2002 and FY 2003
Appropriations Acts and accompanying
reports included Section 330, which
identified a number of transit projects
among projects designated to receive
funding from certain FHWA funding
sources. The FY 2004 Appropriations
Act similarly included transit projects
among projects designated to receive
funding from certain FHWA sources in
Section 115, the FY 2005
Appropriations Act included a set of
designations under Section 117, and the
FY 2006 Appropriations Act included
designations under Section 112, which
may include some projects that FHWA
will identify to be administered by FTA.
For those projects identified by FHWA
as transit in nature, FHWA allots the
funds to FTA to administer. The funds
are available for the designated project
until obligated and expended. Some of
these FY 2002–2006 designations for
transit projects have not yet been
obligated. However, because these are
FHWA funds, funds for projects
unobligated at the end of the FY are not
automatically available as carry over
made available in the following FY.
Instead FHWA re-allots obligation
authority to FTA annually, after
reconciling account balances. Because
the requirements and procedures
associated with these projects differ in
some cases from those for the FTA
programs that FTA grantees are familiar
with, and the availability of funds for
obligation by FTA depends on
allotments from FHWA, transit
applicants seeking funding under these
miscellaneous FHWA designations must
work closely with the appropriate FTA
regional office and FHWA Division
Office when applying for a grant under
these designations.
E. Grant Application Procedures
1. Grantees must provide a Dun and
Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number for
inclusion in all applications for a
Federal grant or cooperative agreement.
The DUNS number should be entered
into the grantee profile in TEAM-Web.
Additional information about this and
other Federal grant streamlining
initiatives mandated by the Federal
Financial Assistance Management
Improvement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–
107) can be accessed on OMB’s Web site
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants/reform.html.
2. All applications for FTA funds
should be submitted electronically to
the appropriate FTA regional office
through TEAM-Web, an Internet-
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
accessible electronic grant application
system. FTA has provided limited
exceptions to the requirement for
electronic filing of applications.
3. In FY 2009, FTA remains
committed to processing applications
promptly upon receipt of a completed
application by the appropriate regional
office. In order for an application to be
considered complete and for FTA to
assign a grant number, enabling
submission in TEAM-Web, the
following requirements must be met:
a. The project is listed in a currently
approved Metropolitan Transportation
Plan, Metropolitan Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP); FTA
approved Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), or
Unified Planning Work Program
(UPWP).
b. All eligibility issues have been
resolved.
c. Required environmental findings
have been made.
d. The project budget’s Activity Line
Items (ALI), scope, and project
description meet FTA requirements.
e. Local share funding source(s) have
been identified.
f. The grantee’s required Civil Rights
submissions are current.
g. Certifications and assurances are
properly submitted.
h. Funding is available, including any
flexible funds included in the budget.
i. For projects involving new
construction (using at least $100 million
in New Starts or formula funds), FTA
engineering staff has reviewed the
project management plan and given
approval.
j. When required for grants related to
New Starts projects, PE and/or FD has
been approved.
k. Milestone information is complete,
or FTA determines that milestone
information can be finalized before the
grant is ready for award. The grant must
include sufficient milestones
appropriate to the scale of the project to
allow adequate oversight to monitor the
progress of projects from the start
through completion and closeout.
4. Under most FTA programs, grants
involving funding related to transit
operations must be submitted to the
Department of Labor (DOL) for
certification of labor protective
arrangements, prior to grant award.
Grants under the Nonurbanized Area
Formula Program and Over-the-Road
Bus Program are covered under the
special warranty provision and do not
require certification. Beginning with
grants associated in FY 2009, Tribal
Transit grants are also covered by the
special warranty. Although grants under
these programs will not be certified,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
they must be submitted to DOL upon
approval by FTA. This change resulted
from the new DOL Regulations, 29 CFR
Part 215, published on August 13, 2008.
In addition, before FTA can award
grants for discretionary projects and
activities designated by Congress,
notification must be given to members
of Congress, and in the case of awards
greater than $500,000, to the House and
Senate authorizing and appropriations
committees three days prior to award.
Discretionary grants allocated by FTA
also go through the Congressional
notification process if they are greater
than $500,000. In previous years, the
amount requiring notification was $1
million; however, the Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2008, lowered the
threshold for notification to $500,000
dollars.
5. Other important issues that impact
FTA grant processing activities are
discussed below.
a. Change in Budget Structure
Because SAFETEA–LU restructured
FTA’s accounts from split funded
accounts to one solely trust funded
account and three general funded
accounts, FTA does not mix funds from
years prior to FY 2006 in the same grant
with funds appropriated in FY 2006 and
beyond (except for New Starts and
research grants). Prior to FY 2006, all
programs were funded approximately 80
percent from MTA of the Highway Trust
Fund and 20 percent from the General
Funds U.S. Treasury. The trust funds
were transferred into the general funded
accounts at the beginning of the year.
Under SAFETEA–LU most programs are
funded entirely from trust funds derived
from the MTA, while the New Starts
and Research programs are funded with
general funds. For a New Starts or
research project, any prior year funds
currently available for obligation and FY
2009 funds may be included in an
amendment to an existing grant.
For formula programs funded solely
from trust funds beginning in FY 2006,
grantees may not combine funds
appropriated since FY 2006 in the same
grant with FY 2005 and prior year
funds. Grant amendments cannot be
made to add FY 2006 and later year
funds to a grant that includes FY 2005
or prior funds. However, grantees are
able to amend new grants established
with FY 2006 or later year funds to add
funds made available after FY 2006. We
regret any inconvenience this
accounting change may cause as we
implement new statutory requirements
under SAFETEA–LU. We encourage
grantees to spend down and close out
old grants as quickly as possible to
minimize the inconvenience.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
77367
b. Grant Budgets—SCOPE and Activity
Line Item (ALI) Codes
FTA uses the SCOPE and Activity
Line Item (ALI) Codes in the grant
budgets to track program trends, to
report to Congress, and to respond to
requests from the Inspector General and
the Government Accountability Office
(GAO), as well as to manage grants. The
accuracy of the data is dependent on the
careful and correct use of codes. As
needed, we revise the SCOPE and ALI
table to include new codes for newly
eligible capital items, to better track
certain expenditures, and to
accommodate new or modified
programs. We encourage grantees to
review the table before selecting codes
from the drop-down menus in TEAMWeb while creating a grant budget and
to consult with the regional office in the
correct use of codes.
c. Earmark and Discretionary Program
Tracking
FTA has implemented procedures in
TEAM-Web for matching grants to
earmarks or projects selected by FTA
under discretionary programs. Each
earmark or selected discretionary
project published in the Federal
Register is associated with a unique
identifier. Tables of earmarks and
selected discretionary projects have also
been established in TEAM-Web. When
applying for a grant using funding
designated by Congress or FTA for a
particular project, grantees are asked to
identify the amount of funding
associated with each specific earmark or
discretionary project used in the grant.
Further instructions are posted on the
TEAM-Website and regional staff can
provide additional assistance.
F. Payments
Once a grant has been awarded and
executed, requests for payment can be
processed. To process payments FTA
uses ECHO-Web, an Internet accessible
system that provides grantees the
capability to submit payment requests
on-line, as well as receive user-IDs and
passwords via e-mail. New applicants
should contact the appropriate FTA
regional office to obtain and submit the
registration package necessary for set-up
under ECHO-Web.
G. Oversight
FTA conducts periodic oversight
reviews to assess grantee compliance
with Federal requirements. Each
urbanized area grantee is reviewed
every three years (a Triennial Review).
Triennial reviews have been modified to
look at the grantee’s involvement in the
coordinated planning for transportation
for the populations targeted by the JARC
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77368
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
and New Freedom programs and
participation in delivery of specialized
services under those programs in the
urbanized area. States are reviewed
periodically for their management of the
Section 5310, 5311, JARC, and New
Freedom programs. Other more detailed
reviews are scheduled based on an
annual grantee risk assessment, for
example, reviews in the areas of
Procurement, Financial Management,
Safety and Civil Rights.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
H. Technical Assistance
FTA headquarters and regional staff
will be pleased to answer your
questions and provide any technical
assistance you may need to apply for
FTA program funds and manage the
grants you receive. This notice and the
program guidance circulars previously
identified in this document may be
accessed via the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov.
In addition, copies of the following
circulars and other useful information
are available on the FTA Web site and
may be obtained from FTA regional
offices; Circular 4220.1F, Third Party
Contracting Requirements; and Circular
5010.1D, Grant Management Guidelines.
Both circulars were recently revised and
can be found at https://www.fta.dot.gov/
laws/leg_reg_circulars_guidance.html.
The FY 2009 Annual List of
Certifications and Assurances and
Master Agreement are also posted on the
FTA Web site. The DOT final rule on
‘‘Participation by Disadvantaged
Business Enterprises in Department of
Transportation Financial Assistance
Programs,’’ which was effective July 16,
2003, can be found at https://
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_
04/49cfr26_04.html/
Issued in Washington, DC, this 8th day of
December 2008.
Sherry Little,
Acting Administrator.
Appendix A
FTA Regional Offices
Richard H. Doyle, Regional
Administrator, Region 1—Boston,
Kendall Square, 55 Broadway, Suite
920, Cambridge, MA 02142–1093, Tel.
617 494–2055.
States served: Connecticut, Maine,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
Rhode Island, and Vermont
Brigid Hynes-Cherin, Regional
Administrator, Region 2—New York,
One Bowling Green, Room 429, New
York, NY 10004–1415, Tel. No. 212
668–2170.
States served: New Jersey, New York
Letitia Thompson, Regional
Administrator, Region 3—
Philadelphia, 1760 Market Street,
Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19103–
4124, Tel. 215 656–7100.
States served: Delaware, Maryland,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia,
and District of Columbia
Yvette Taylor, Regional Administrator,
Region 4—Atlanta, Atlanta Federal
Center, Suite 17T50, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, GA 30303, Tel.
404 562–3500.
States served: Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North
Carolina, Puerto Rico, South Carolina,
Tennessee, and Virgin Islands
Marisol Simon, Regional Administrator,
Region 5—Chicago, 200 West Adams
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606,
Tel. 312 353–2789.
States served: Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and
Wisconsin
Robert C. Patrick, Regional
Administrator, Region 6—Ft. Worth,
819 Taylor Street, Room 8A36, Ft.
Worth, TX 76102, Tel. 817 978–0550.
States served: Arkansas, Louisiana,
Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas
Mokhtee Ahmad, Regional
Administrator, Region 7—Kansas
City, MO, 901 Locust Street, Room
404, Kansas City, MO 64106, Tel. 816
329–3920.
States served: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri,
and Nebraska
Terry Rosapep, Regional Administrator,
Region 8—Denver, 12300 West Dakota
Ave., Suite 310, Lakewood, CO
80228–2583, Tel. 720–963–3300.
States served: Colorado, Montana, North
Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and
Wyoming
Leslie T. Rogers, Regional
Administrator, Region 9—San
Francisco, 201 Mission Street, Room
2210, San Francisco, CA 94105–1926,
Tel. 415 744–3133.
States served: American Samoa,
Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii,
Nevada, and the Northern Mariana
Islands
Rick Krochalis, Regional Administrator,
Region 10—Seattle, Jackson Federal
Building, 915 Second Avenue, Suite
3142, Seattle, WA 98174–1002, Tel.
206 220–7954.
States served: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon,
and Washington
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77369
EN18DE08.000
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.001
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77370
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77371
EN18DE08.002
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.003
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77372
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77373
EN18DE08.004
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.005
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77374
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77375
EN18DE08.006
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.007
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77376
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77377
EN18DE08.008
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.009
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77378
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77379
EN18DE08.010
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.011
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77380
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77381
EN18DE08.012
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.013
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77382
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77383
EN18DE08.014
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.015
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77384
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77385
EN18DE08.016
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.017
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77386
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77387
EN18DE08.018
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.019
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77388
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77389
EN18DE08.020
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.021
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77390
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77391
EN18DE08.022
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.023
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77392
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77393
EN18DE08.024
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.025
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77394
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77395
EN18DE08.026
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.027
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77396
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77397
EN18DE08.028
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.029
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77398
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77399
EN18DE08.030
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.031
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77400
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77401
EN18DE08.032
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.033
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77402
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77403
EN18DE08.034
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.035
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77404
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77405
EN18DE08.036
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.037
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77406
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77407
EN18DE08.038
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.039
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77408
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77409
EN18DE08.040
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.041
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77410
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77411
EN18DE08.042
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.043
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77412
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77413
EN18DE08.044
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.045
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77414
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77415
EN18DE08.046
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.047
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77416
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77417
EN18DE08.048
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.049
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77418
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77419
EN18DE08.050
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.051
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77420
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77421
EN18DE08.052
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.053
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77422
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77423
EN18DE08.054
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.055
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77424
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77425
EN18DE08.056
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.057
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77426
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
77427
EN18DE08.058
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.059
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
77428
77429
[FR Doc. E8–29645 Filed 12–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–C
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 Dec 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18DEN2.SGM
18DEN2
EN18DE08.060
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 / Notices
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 244 (Thursday, December 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77344-77429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29645]
[[Page 77343]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part IV
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Transit Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FTA Fiscal Year 2009 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program
Information; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 244 / Thursday, December 18, 2008 /
Notices
[[Page 77344]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
FTA Fiscal Year 2009 Apportionments, Allocations, and Program
Information
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Division A of the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance,
and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, (Pub. L. 110-329) signed into
law by President Bush on September 30, 2008, continues to fund the
Federal transit programs of the Department of Transportation (DOT) at
the same levels that were available under Division K of the
``Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008'' (Pub. L. 110-161) until a DOT
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 is enacted or March 6,
2009, whichever occurs first. This notice provides information on
funding amounts that are currently available for the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) assistance programs; provides program guidance and
requirements; and provides information on several program issues
important in the current year. The notice also includes tables that
show certain discretionary programs unobligated (carryover) funding
from previous years that will be available for obligation during FY
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information about this
notice contact Henrika Buchanan-Smith, Director, Office of Transit
Programs, at (202) 366-2053. Please contact the appropriate FTA
regional office for any specific requests for information or technical
assistance. The Appendix at the end of this notice includes contact
information for FTA regional offices. An FTA headquarters contact for
each major program area is also included in the discussion of that
program in the text of the notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Overview
II. FY 2009 Available Funding for FTA Programs
A. Available Funding Based on Division A of the Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009, and Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)
B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Oversight
III. FY 2009 FTA Key Program Initiatives and Changes
A. SAFETEA-LU Implementation
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities
D. Flexible Funding Procedures
E. Changes in Match for Biodiesel Vehicles and Hybrid Retrofits
F. National Transit Database (NTD) Disaster Adjustments Policy
IV. FTA PROGRAMS
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
B. Statewide Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5305)
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307)
D. Clean Fuels Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5308)
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway
Modernization
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Bus and Bus-
Related Facilities
G. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--New Starts
H. Special Needs of Elderly Individuals and Individuals With
Disabilities Program (49 U.S.C. 5310)
I. Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5311)
J. Rural Transportation Assistance Program (49 U.S.C.
5311(b)(3))
K. Public Transportation on Indian Reservation Program (49
U.S.C. 5311(c))
L. National Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5314)
M. Job Access and Reverse Commute Program (49 U.S.C. 5316)
N. New Freedom Program (49 U.S.C. 5317)
O. Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Program (49 U.S.C. 5320)
P. Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. 5339)
Q. Growing States and High Density States Formula (49 U.S.C.
5340)
R. Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility Program (49 U.S.C. 5310 note)
V. FTA Policy And Procedures for FY 2009 Grants Requirements
A. Automatic Pre-Award Authority To Incur Project Costs
B. Letter of No Prejudice (LONP) Policy
C. FTA FY 2009 Annual List of Certifications and Assurances
D. FHWA Funds Used for Transit Purposes
E. Grant Application Procedures
F. Payments
G. Oversight
H. Technical Assistance
TABLES
1. FTA FY 2009 APPROPRIATIONS AND APPORTIONMENTS FOR GRANT
PROGRAMS
2. FTA FY 2009 METROPOLITAN PLANNING PROGRAM AND STATEWIDE
PLANNING AND RESEARCH PROGRAM APPORTIONMENTS
3. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5307 AND SECTION 5340 URBANIZED AREA
APPORTIONMENTS
4. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5307 APPORTIONMENT FORMULA
5. FTA FY 2009 FORMULA PROGRAMS APPORTIONMENTS DATA UNIT VALUES
6. FTA FY 2009 SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES PERFORMANCE DATA
AND APPORTIONMENTS
7. FTA PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5308 CLEAN FUELS
ALLOCATIONS
8. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5309 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION
APPORTIONMENTS
9. FTA FY 2009 FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION PROGRAM
APPORTIONMENT FORMULA
10. FTA PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 BUS AND BUS-RELATED
FACILITIES ALLOCATIONS
11. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS ALLOCATIONS
12. FTA PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5309 NEW STARTS
ALLOCATIONS
13. FTA FY 2009 SPECIAL NEEDS FOR ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES APPORTIONMENTS
14. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5311 AND SECTION 5340 NONURBANIZED AREA
FORMULA APPORTIONMENTS, AND RURAL TRANSPORTATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
(RTAP) ALLOCATIONS
15. FTA PRIOR UNOBLIGATED TRIBAL TRANSIT DISCRETIONARY
ALLOCATIONS
16. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5316 JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE
(JARC) APPORTIONMENTS
17. FTA PRIOR UNOBLIGATED DISCRETIONARY JARC ALLOCATIONS
18. FTA FY 2009 SECTION 5317 NEW FREEDOM APPORTIONMENTS
19. FTA PRIOR YEAR UNOBLIGATED SECTION 5339 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
ALLOCATIONS
APPENDIX
I. Overview
This document apportions or allocates the FY 2009 funds that were
made available under Division A of the Consolidated Security, Disaster
Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, (Pub. L. 110-329,
September 30, 2008), hereinafter, (``Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009'') among potential program recipients according to statutory
formulas in 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 and existing Full Funding Grant
Agreements. The notice only includes the amount of FY 2009 funds that
is currently available, which is approximately \5/12\ or 43% of the
amounts that were available under the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2008. The notice does not include any extension or reprogramming of any
discretionary funds that lapsed to the designated project as of
September 30, 2008. The notice also does not include partial amounts
made available to projects designated Bus and Bus-Related Facilities
Program funds or National Research Program funds under SAFETEA-LU. FTA
will issue a supplemental notice at a later date regarding these
projects and any additional increments of formula and discretionary
funds that become available.
[[Page 77345]]
For each FTA program included in this notice, we have provided
relevant information on the FY 2009 funding currently available,
program requirements, period of availability, and other related program
information and highlights, as appropriate. A separate section of the
document provides information on program requirements and guidance that
are applicable to all FTA programs.
II. FY 2009 Funding for FTA Programs
A. Funding Based on the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L.
110-329, September 30, 2008) and SAFETEA-LU Authorization
The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, provides general funds and
obligation authority on trust funds from the MTA that total $4.1
billion for FTA programs, until a DOT Appropriations Act for FY 2009 is
enacted or a continued continuing Resolution after March 6, 2009,
whichever occurs first. Table 1 of this document shows the funding for
the FTA programs, as provided for in the Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009. All Formula Programs and the Section 5309 Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities Program are funded entirely from MTA of the Highway Trust
Fund in FY 2009. The Section 5309 New Starts Program, the Research
Program, and FTA administrative expenses are funded by appropriations
from the General Fund of the Treasury.
Congress has enacted a partial year Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009. This Federal Register notice includes tables of apportionments
and allocations for FTA formula programs based on that Act. Prorated
allocations based on FY 2008 funding levels are also included for
active Full Funding Grant Agreements (FFGAs) under the New Starts
discretionary program; however, FY 2009 discretionary allocations for
other discretionary programs will not be published until FTA issues a
subsequent notice as additional resources are made available.
B. Program Funds Set-Aside for Project Management Oversight
FTA uses a percentage of funds appropriated to certain FTA programs
for program oversight activities conducted by the agency. The funds are
used to provide necessary oversight activities, including oversight of
the construction of any major capital project under these statutory
programs; to conduct safety and security, civil rights, procurement
systems, management, planning certification and, financial reviews and
audits, as well as evaluations and analyses of grantee specific
problems and issues; and to provide technical assistance to correct
deficiencies identified in compliance reviews and audits.
Section 5327 of title 49 U.S.C., authorizes the takedown of funds
from FTA programs for project management oversight. Section 5327
provides oversight takedowns at the following levels: 0.5 percent of
Planning funds, 0.75 percent of Urbanized Area Formula funds, 1 percent
of Capital Investment funds, 0.5 percent of Special Needs of Elderly
Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities formula funds, 0.5
percent of Nonurbanized Area Formula funds, and 0.5 percent of the Paul
S. Sarbanes Transit in the Parks Program funds (formerly the
Alternative Transportation in the Parks and Public Lands Program).
III. FY 2009 FTA Program Initiatives and Changes
A. SAFETEA-LU Implementation
In FY 2009, FTA continues to focus on implementation of SAFETEA-LU
through issuance of new and revised program guidance and regulations.
Before any documents that place binding obligations on grantees are
finalized and issued, FTA makes them available for public comment. We
encourage grantees to regularly check the FTA Web site at https://
www.fta.dot.gov and the U.S. Government docket management Website at
https://regulations.gov for new issuances and to comment to the docket
established for each document on relevant issues.
B. Planning Emphasis Areas
In recognition of the priority planning organizations and grantees
are giving to the implementation of the new and changed provisions of
SAFETEA-LU, FTA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) are not
issuing new planning emphasis areas for FY 2009, and have rescinded
planning emphasis areas from prior years.
C. Earmarks and Competitive Grant Opportunities
SAFETEA-LU contained statutory earmarks under several programs.
Absent future legislation to the contrary, FTA will honor the statutory
earmarks; however, funds for the FY 2009 discretionary programs with
the exception of New Start Program funds for existing FFGAs will not be
made available in partial increments. FTA will publish the availability
of discretionary funds in a subsequent notice. This notice does include
tables of unobligated balances for earmarks from previous years under
the Bus and Bus-Related Facilities Program, the New Starts Program, the
Clean Fuels Program, and the Alternatives Analysis Program. FTA will
continue to honor those earmarks. FTA will supplement this notice, at a
later date, to provide any additional discretionary allocations of
funds made available in FY 2009 and any lapsed prior year earmarks that
the Secretary of Transportation determines to extend or reprogram, once
the Department has examined the requests.
D. Flexible Funding Procedures
Obligation authority for flexible funds, high priority projects and
other transit projects in title 23 U.S.C. is transferred to FTA when
States and local agencies determine that FTA will administer the
project. The liquidating cash, however, is transferred between Federal
accounts only as needed to ensure that adequate funds are available for
disbursement on a timely basis. In order to track the cash flow more
closely, FTA no longer combines funds transferred from FHWA into a
single grant with FTA funds in the program to which they are
transferred. FTA has established codes and procedures for grants
involving funds transferred from FHWA. Grantees can contact the
appropriate regional office for assistance.
E. Changes in Match for Biodiesel Vehicles and Hybrid Retrofits
Section 164 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, allowed a
90 percent Federal share for biodiesel buses and for the net capital
cost of factory-installed or retrofitted hybrid electric propulsion
systems and any equipment related to such a system. This increased
federal share is a cross-cutting provision and is applicable across FTA
programs for any grants awarded during FY 2008 regardless of what
fiscal year funding is used. This provision remains in effect pursuant
to Division A of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, which expires
on or before March 6, 2009. Grantees may apply for a 90 percent Federal
share for the entire cost of a biodiesel bus, but only for the cost of
the propulsion system and related equipment in the case of the hybrid
electric systems, not for 90 percent of the cost of the entire vehicle.
In lieu of calculating the costs of the equipment separately, grantees
may apply for 83 percent of the cost of the vehicle.
[[Page 77346]]
F. National Transit Database (NTD) Disaster Adjustments Policy
Previously, when a transit provider could not report to the NTD due
to an ``Act of God'', such as an earthquake, fire, or flood, FTA would
grant the affected transit provider a ``hold harmless adjustment,'' by
using the previous year's service data reported to the NTD for that
transit provider in the apportionment of formula grants for urbanized
areas. On August 14, 2008, FTA proposed to change this policy and
initiated notice and comment on the proposal. Effective November 13,
2008, (73 FR 67247), FTA established a new policy, retroactive to NTD
Report Year (RY) 2007 data, allowing transit providers that suffer a
marked decrease in service data due to a natural or man-made disaster
to receive a similar ``hold harmless adjustment'' in the apportionment
of formula grants for urbanized areas. This adjustment is not automatic
and must be requested in writing by either the affected transit
provider, or the affected designated recipient for the urbanized area.
FTA will approve or deny each request at its discretion based on the
following factors: (1) Whether a Federal disaster declaration was in
place for all or part of the current report year, for either all or
part of the transit provider's service area; (2) whether the request
demonstrates that the decrease in transit service from the report year
before the disaster is in large part due to the ongoing impact of the
disaster; and (3) whether the request demonstrates that the decrease in
transit service reasonably appears to be temporary, and does not
reflect the true transit needs of the urbanized area. FTA will not
grant adjustment requests that do not address all three factors.
Adjustment requests should include sufficient documentation to allow
FTA to evaluate the request based on these factors. FTA may request
additional information from an applicant for an adjustment to evaluate
the request based on these factors. A request for an adjustment may
only be made for one year at a time. Requests for an adjustment related
to the same disaster may be made in subsequent years, provided that the
applicant can continue to support its request based on the above
factors. If the adjustment request is granted, the NTD data in all
publicly-available data sets and data products would remain unadjusted,
and would reflect the actual NTD submission for the transit provider.
The only adjustment would be in using data from the previous full NTD
Report Year before the disaster occurred in the data sets used for the
apportionments of formula grants for urbanized areas.
Further instructions for requesting a ``hold harmless'' adjustment
will be found in future editions of the NTD Annual Reporting Manual,
available at https://www.ntdprogram.gov.
IV. FTA Programs
This section of the notice provides available FY 2009 funding and/
or other important program-related information for the three major FTA
funding accounts included in the notice (Formula and Bus Grants,
Capital Investment Grants, and Research Grants). Of the 17 separate FTA
programs contained in this notice that fall under the major program
area headings, funding for ten programs is apportioned by statutory or
administrative formula. Funding for the other seven is allocated on a
discretionary or competitive basis.
Funding and/or other important information for each of the 17
programs is presented immediately below. This includes program
apportionments or allocations, certain program requirements, length of
time FY 2009 funding is available for obligation and other significant
program information pertaining to FY 2009.
A. Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5305(d))
Section 5305(d) authorizes federal funding to support a
cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive planning program for
transportation investment decision-making at the metropolitan area
level. The specific requirements of metropolitan transportation
planning are set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5303 and further explained in 23
CFR Part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR Part 613, Statewide Transportation
Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning; Final Rule. State
Departments of Transportation are direct recipients of funds allocated
by FTA, which are then suballocated to Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPOs) by formula, for planning activities that support
the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling
global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency; increasing the
safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and non-
motorized users; increasing the accessibility and mobility options
available to people and for freight; protecting and enhancing the
environment, promoting energy conservation, and improving quality of
life; enhancing the integration and connectivity of the transportation
system, across and between modes, for people and freight; promoting
efficient system management and operation; and emphasizing the
preservation of the existing transportation system. This funding must
support work elements and activities resulting in balanced and
comprehensive intermodal transportation planning for the movement of
people and goods in the metropolitan area. Comprehensive transportation
planning is not limited to transit planning or surface transportation
planning, but also encompasses the relationships among land use and all
transportation modes, without regard to the programmatic source of
Federal assistance. Eligible work elements or activities include, but
are not limited to studies relating to management, planning,
operations, capital requirements, and economic feasibility; evaluation
of previously funded projects; peer reviews and exchanges of technical
data, information, assistance, and related activities in support of
planning and environmental analysis among MPOs and other transportation
planners; work elements and related activities preliminary to and in
preparation for constructing, acquiring, or improving the operation of
facilities and equipment. An exhaustive list of eligible work
activities is provided in FTA Circular 8100.1C, Program Guidance for
Metropolitan Planning and State Planning and Research Program Grants,
dated September 1, 2008. For more about the Metropolitan Planning
Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact Victor Austin Office of
Planning and Environment at (202) 366-2996.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, provides $38,068,323 to
the Metropolitan Planning Program (49 U.S.C. 5305(d)) to support
metropolitan transportation planning activities set forth in 49 U.S.C.
5303. The total amount apportioned for the Metropolitan Planning
Program to States for MPOs' use in urbanized areas (UZAs) is
37,877,981, as shown in the table below, after the deduction for
oversight and the addition of prior year reapportioned funds.
Metropolitan Planning Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation................................... $38,068,323
Oversight Deduction................................... -190,342
-----------------
Total Apportioned................................. 37,877,981
------------------------------------------------------------------------
States' apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.
[[Page 77347]]
2. Basis for Formula Apportionments
As specified in law, 82.72 percent of the amounts authorized for
Section 5305 are allocated to the Metropolitan Planning program. FTA
allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to the States according to a
statutory formula. Eighty percent of the funds are distributed to the
States as a basic allocation based on each State's UZA population,
based on the most recent decennial Census. The remaining 20 percent is
provided to the States as a supplemental allocation based on an FTA
administrative formula to address planning needs in the larger, more
complex UZAs. The amount published for each State is a combined total
of both the basic and supplemental allocation.
3. Program Requirements
The State allocates Metropolitan Planning funds to MPOs in UZAs or
portions thereof to provide funds for projects included in an annual
work program (the Unified Planning Work Program, or UPWP) that includes
both highway and transit planning projects. Each State has either
reaffirmed or developed, in consultation with their MPOs, a new
allocation formula, as a result of the 2000 Census. The State
allocation formula may be changed annually, but any change requires
approval by the FTA regional office before grant approval. Program
guidance for the Metropolitan Planning Program is found in FTA Circular
8100.1C, Program Guidance for Metropolitan Planning and State Planning
and Research Program Grants, dated September 1, 2008. For more about
the Metropolitan Planning Program and the FTA Circular 8100.1C, contact
Victor Austin of the Office of Planning and Environment at (202) 366-
2996.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the Metropolitan Planning program
remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients for four fiscal
years--which includes the year of apportionment plus three additional
years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the close of
business on September 30, 2012, will revert to FTA for reapportionment
under the Metropolitan Planning Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
a. Planning Emphasis Areas (PEAs). FTA and FHWA are not issuing new
PEAs this year, and are rescinding PEAs issued in prior years, in light
of the priority given to implementation of SAFETEA-LU planning and
program provisions.
b. Consolidated Planning Grants. FTA and FHWA planning funds under
both the Metropolitan Planning and State Planning and Research Programs
can be consolidated into a single consolidated planning grant (CPG),
awarded by either FTA or FHWA. The CPG eliminates the need to monitor
individual fund sources, if several have been used, and ensures that
the oldest funds will always be used first. Unlike ``flex funds'' for
capital programs, planning funds from FHWA may be combined with FTA
planning funds in a single grant. Alternatively, FTA planning funds may
be transferred to FHWA to be administered as combined grants.
Under the CPG, States can report metropolitan planning program
expenditures (to comply with the Single Audit Act) for both FTA and
FHWA under the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance number for
FTA's Metropolitan Planning Program (20.505). Additionally, for States
with an FHWA Metropolitan Planning (PL) fund-matching ratio greater
than 80 percent, the State can waive the 20 percent local share
requirement, with FTA's concurrence, to allow FTA funds used for
metropolitan planning in a CPG to be granted at the higher FHWA rate.
For some States, this Federal match rate can exceed 90 percent.
States interested in transferring planning funds between FTA and
FHWA should contact the FTA Regional Office or FHWA Division Office for
more detailed procedures. Current guidelines are included in Federal
Highway Administration Memorandum dated July 12, 2007, ``Information:
Final Transfers to Other Agencies that Administer Title 23 Programs.''
For further information on CPGs, contact Kristen Clarke, Office of
Budget and Policy, FTA, at (202) 366-1686, Ken Johnson, Office of
Program Management, FTA, at (202) 366-1659, or Kenneth Petty, Office of
Planning and Environment, FHWA, at (202) 366-6654.
B. State Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5305(e))
This program provides financial assistance to States for Statewide
transportation planning and other technical assistance activities,
including supplementing the technical assistance program provided
through the Metropolitan Planning program. The specific requirements of
Statewide transportation planning are set forth in 49 U.S.C. 5304 and
further explained in 23 CFR Part 450 as referenced in 49 CFR Part 613,
Statewide Transportation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation
Planning; Final Rule. This funding must support work elements and
activities resulting in balanced and comprehensive intermodal
transportation planning for the movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning is not limited to transit
planning or surface transportation planning, but also encompasses the
relationships among land use and all transportation modes, without
regard to the programmatic source of Federal assistance. For more
information, contact Victor Austin of the Office of Planning and
Environment at (202) 366-2996.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, provides $7,952,377 to the
State Planning and Research Program (49 U.S.C. 5305). The total amount
apportioned for the State Planning and Research Program (SPRP) is
$7,912,615, as shown in the table below, after the deduction for
oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327).
State Planning and Research Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation................................... $7,952,377
Oversight Deduction................................... -39,762
-----------------
Total Apportioned................................. 7,912,615
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State apportionments for this program are displayed in Table 2.
2. Basis for Apportionment Formula
As specified in law, 17.28 percent of the amounts authorized for
Section 5305 are allocated to the State Planning and Research program.
FTA apportions funds to States by a statutory formula that is based on
the most recent decennial Census, and the State's UZA population as
compared to the UZA population of all States.
3. Requirements
Funds are provided to States for Statewide transportation planning
programs. These funds may be used for a variety of purposes such as
planning, technical studies and assistance, demonstrations, and
management training. In addition, a State may authorize a portion of
these funds to be used to supplement Metropolitan Planning funds
allocated by the State to its UZAs, as the State deems appropriate.
Program guidance for the State Planning and Research program is found
in FTA Circular 8100.1C. This funding must support work elements and
activities resulting in balanced and comprehensive intermodal
[[Page 77348]]
transportation planning for the movement of people and goods.
Comprehensive transportation planning is not limited to transit
planning or surface transportation planning, but also encompasses the
relationships among land use and all transportation modes, without
regard to the programmatic source of Federal assistance. Eligible work
elements or activities include, but are not limited to studies relating
to management, planning, operations, capital requirements, and economic
feasibility; evaluation of previously funded projects; peer reviews and
exchanges of technical data, information, assistance, and related
activities in support of planning and environmental analysis; work
elements and related activities preliminary to and in preparation for
constructing, acquiring, or improving the operation of facilities and
equipment. An exhaustive list of eligible work activities is provided
in FTA Circular 8100.1C, Program Guidance for Metropolitan Planning and
State Planning and Research Program Grants, dated September 1, 2008.
For more information, contact Victor Austin, Office of Planning and
Environment at (202) 366-2996.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned under the State Planning and Research program
remain available to be obligated by FTA to recipients for four fiscal
years--which include the year of apportionment plus three additional
fiscal years. Any apportioned funds that remain unobligated at the
close of business on September 30, 2012, will revert to FTA for
reapportionment under the State Planning and Research Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
See Section A5 for information about Planning Emphasis Areas and
CPGs.
C. Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307)
Section 5307 authorizes Federal capital and operating assistance,
in some cases, for transit in Urbanized Areas (UZAs). A UZA is an area
with a population of 50,000 or more that has been defined and
designated as such in the most recent decennial Census by the U.S.
Census Bureau. The Urbanized Area Formula Program funds may also be
used to support planning activities, and may supplement to planning
projects funded under the Metropolitan Planning program described
above. Urbanized Areas Formula Program funds used for planning must be
shown in the UPWP for MPO(s) with responsibility for that area. Funding
is apportioned directly to each UZA with a population of 200,000 or
more, and to the State Governors for UZAs with populations between
50,000 and 200,000. Eligible applicants are limited to entities
designated as recipients in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5307(a)(2) and
other public entities with the consent of the Designated Recipient.
Generally, operating assistance is not an eligible expense for UZAs
with populations of 200,000 or more. However, there are several
exceptions to this restriction. The exceptions are described in section
3(d)(5) below.
For more information about the Urbanized Area Formula Program
contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-1660.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, provides $1,682,053,574 to
the Urbanized Area Formula Program (49 U.S.C. 5307). The total amount
apportioned for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is $1,828,187,915 as
shown in the table below, after the 0.75 percent deduction for
oversight (authorized by 49 U.S.C. 5327) and including funds
apportioned to UZAs from the appropriation for Section 5340 for Growing
States and High Density States.
Urbanized Area Formula Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation.................................. $1,682,053,574
\a\
Oversight Deduction.................................. -12,615,402
Section 5340 Funds Added............................. 158,749,743
------------------
Total Apportioned................................ 1,828,187,915
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ One percent set-aside for Small Transit Intensive Cities Formula.
Table 3 displays the amounts apportioned under the Urbanized Area
Formula Program.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
FTA apportions Urbanized Area Formula Program funds based on
legislative formulas. Different formulas apply to UZAs with populations
of 200,000 or more and to UZAs with populations less than 200,000. For
UZAs with 50,000 to 199,999 in population, the formula is based solely
on population and population density. For UZAs with populations of
200,000 and more, the formula is based on a combination of bus revenue
vehicle miles, bus passenger miles, fixed guideway revenue vehicle
miles, and fixed guideway route miles, as well as population and
population density. Table 4 includes detailed information about the
formulas.
To calculate a UZA's FY 2009 apportionment, FTA used population and
population density statistics from the 2000 Census and (when
applicable) validated mileage and transit service data from transit
providers' 2007 National Transit Database (NTD) Report Year. Pursuant
to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b), FTA used 60 percent of the directional route
miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger operations system
to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage, Alaska UZA.
We have calculated dollar unit values for the formula factors used
in the Urbanized Area Formula Program apportionment calculations. These
values represent the amount of money each unit of a factor is worth in
this year's apportionment. The unit values change each year, based on
all of the data used to calculate the apportionments. The dollar unit
values for FY 2009 are displayed in Table 5. To replicate the basic
formula component of a UZA's apportionment, multiply the dollar unit
value by the appropriate formula factor (i.e., the population,
population x population density), and when applicable, data from the
NTD (i.e., route miles, vehicle revenue miles, passenger miles, and
operating cost).
In FY 2009, one percent of funds appropriated for Section 5307, or
$16,820,536 based on the Continuing Appropriations Act, is set aside
for Small Transit Intensive Cities (STIC). FTA apportions these funds
to UZAs under 200,000 in population that operate at a level of service
equal to or above the industry average level of service for all UZAs
with a population of at least 200,000, but not more than 999,999, in
one or more of six performance categories: Passenger miles traveled per
vehicle revenue mile, passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue
hour, vehicle revenue miles per capita, vehicle revenue hours per
capita, passenger miles traveled per capita, and passengers per capita.
The data for these categories for the purpose of FY 2009
apportionments comes from the NTD reports for the 2007 reporting year.
This data is used to determine a UZA's eligibility under the STIC
formula, and is also used in the STIC apportionment calculations.
Because these performance data change with each year's NTD reports, the
UZAs eligible for STIC funds and the amount each receives may vary each
year. In FY 2009, FTA apportioned $56,826 for each performance factor/
category for which the urbanized area exceeded the national average for
UZAs with a
[[Page 77349]]
population of at least 200,000 but not more than 999,999.
In addition to the funds apportioned to UZAs, according to the
Section 5307 formula factors contained in 49 U.S.C. 5336, FTA also
apportions funds to urbanized areas under Section 5340 Growing States
and High Density States formula factors. In FY 2009, FTA apportions
$64,557,843 to 453 UZA's in all 50 States and $94,191,900 to 46 UZAs in
seven High Density States. Half of the funds appropriated for Section
5340 are available to Growing States and half to High Density States.
FTA apportions Growing States funds by a formula based on State
population forecasts for 15 years beyond the most recent Census. FTA
distributes the amounts apportioned for each State between UZAs and
nonurbanized areas based on the ratio of urbanized/nonurbanized
population within each State in the 2000 census, and to UZAs
proportionately based on UZA population in the 2000 census because
population estimates are not available at the UZA level. FTA apportions
the High Density States funds to States with population densities in
excess of 370 persons per square mile. These funds are apportioned only
to UZAs within those States. FTA pro-rates each UZA's share of the High
Density funds based on the population of the UZAs in the State in the
2000 census.
FTA cannot provide unit values for the Growing States or High
Density formulas because the allocations to individual States and
urbanized areas are based on their relative population data, rather
than on a national per capita basis.
Based on language in the conference report accompanying SAFETEA-LU,
FTA is to show a single apportionment amount for Section 5307, STIC and
Section 5340. FTA shows a single Section 5307 apportionment amount for
each UZA in Table 3, the Urbanized Area Formula apportionments. The
amount includes funds apportioned based on the Section 5307 formula
factors, any STIC funds, and any Growing States and High Density States
funding allocated to the area. FTA uses separate formulas to calculate
and generate the respective apportionment amounts for the Section 5307,
STIC and Section 5340. For technical assistance purposes, the UZAs that
received STIC funds are listed in Table 6. FTA will make available
breakouts of the funding allocated to each UZA under these formulas,
upon request to the regional office.
3. Program Requirements
Program guidance for the Urbanized Area Formula Program is
presently found in FTA Circular C9030.1C, Urbanized Area Formula
Program: Grant Application Instructions, dated October 1, 1998, and
supplemented by additional information or changes provided in this
document. FTA is in the process of updating the circular. Several
important program requirements are highlighted below.
a. Urbanized Area Formula Apportionments to Governors
For small UZAs, those with a population of less than 200,000, FTA
apportions funds to the Governor of each State for distribution. A
single total Governor's apportionment amount for the Urbanized Area
Formula, STIC, and Growing States and High Density States is shown in
the Urbanized Area Formula Apportionment Table 3. The table also shows
the apportionment amount attributable to each small UZA within the
State. The Governor may determine the sub-allocation of funds among the
small UZAs except that funds attributed to a small UZA that is located
within the planning boundaries of a Transportation Management Area
(TMA) must be obligated to that small UZA, as discussed in subsection f
below.
b. Transit Enhancements
Section 5307(d)(1)(K) requires that one percent of Section 5307
funds apportioned to UZAs with populations of 200,000 or more be spent
on eligible transit enhancement activities or projects. This
requirement is now treated as a certification, rather than as a set-
aside as was the case under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st
Century (TEA-21). Designated recipients in UZAs with populations of
200,000 or more certify they are spending not less than one percent of
Section 5307 funds for transit enhancements. In addition, Designated
Recipients must submit an annual report on how they spent the money
with the Federal fiscal year's final quarterly progress report in TEAM-
Web. The report should include the following elements: (a) Grantee
name; (b) UZA name and number; (c) FTA project number; (d) transit
enhancement category; (e) brief description of enhancement and progress
towards project implementation; (f) activity line item code from the
approved budget; and (g) amount awarded by FTA for the enhancement. The
list of transit enhancement categories and activity line item (ALI)
codes may be found in the table of Scope and ALI codes on TEAM-Web,
which can be accessed at https://FTATEAMWeb.fta.dot.gov.
The term ``transit enhancement'' includes projects or project
elements that are designed to enhance public transportation service or
use and are physically or functionally related to transit facilities.
Eligible enhancements include the following: (1) Historic preservation,
rehabilitation, and operation of historic mass transportation
buildings, structures, and facilities (including historic bus and
railroad facilities); (2) bus shelters; (3) landscaping and other
scenic beautification, including tables, benches, trash receptacles,
and street lights; (4) public art; (5) pedestrian access and walkways;
(6) bicycle access, including bicycle storage facilities and installing
equipment for transporting bicycles on mass transportation vehicles;
(7) transit connections to parks within the recipient's transit service
area; (8) signage; and (9) enhanced access for persons with
disabilities to mass transportation.
It is the responsibility of the MPO to determine how the one-
percent for transit enhancements will be allotted to transit projects.
The one percent minimum requirement does not preclude more than one
percent from being expended in a UZA for transit enhancements. However,
activities that are only eligible as enhancements--in particular,
operating costs for historic facilities--may be assisted only within
the one-percent funding level.
c. Transit Security Projects
Pursuant to section 5307(d)(1)(J), each recipient of Urbanized Area
Formula funds must certify that of the amount received each fiscal
year, it will expend at least one percent on ``public transportation
security projects'' or must certify that it has decided the expenditure
is not necessary. For applicants not eligible to receive Section 5307
funds for operating assistance, only capital security projects may be
funded with the one percent. SAFETEA-LU, however, expanded the
definition of eligible ``capital'' projects to include specific crime
prevention and security activities, including: (1) Projects to refine
and develop security and emergency response plans; (2) projects aimed
at detecting chemical and biological agents in public transportation;
(3) the conduct of emergency response drills with public transportation
agencies and local first response agencies; and (4) security training
for public transportation employees, but excluding all expenses related
to operations, other than such
[[Page 77350]]
expenses incurred in conducting emergency drills and training. ALI
codes have been established for these four new capital activities. The
one percent may also include security expenditures included within
other capital activities, and, where the recipient is eligible,
operating assistance. The relevant ALI codes would be used for those
activities.
FTA is often called upon to report to Congress and others on how
grantees are expending Federal funds for security enhancements. To
facilitate tracking of grantees' security expenditures, which are not
always evident when included within larger capital or operating
activity line items in the grant budget, we have established a non-
additive (``non-add'') scope code for security expenditures--Scope 991.
The non-add scope is to be used to aggregate activities included in
other scopes, and it does not increase the budget total. Section 5307
grantees should include this non-add scope in the project budget for
each new Section 5307 grant application or amendment. Under this non-
add scope, the applicant should repeat the full amount of any of the
line items in the budget that are exclusively for security and include
the portion of any other line item in the project budget that is
attributable to security, using under the non-add scope the same line
item used in the project budget. The grantee can modify the ALI
description or use the extended text feature, if necessary, to describe
the security expenditures.
The grantee must provide information regarding its use of the one
percent for security as part of each Section 5307 grant application,
using a special screen in TEAM-Web. If the grantee has certified that
it is not necessary to expend one percent for security, the Section
5307 grant application must include information to support that
certification. FTA will not process an application for a Section 5307
grant until the security information is complete.
d. FY 2009 Operating Assistance
UZAs under 200,000 in population may use Section 5307 funds for
operating assistance. In addition, Section 5307, as amended by,
SAFETEA-LU and TEA-21, allows some UZAs with a population of 200,000 or
more to use FY 2009 Urbanized Area Formula funds for operating
assistance under certain conditions. The specific provisions allowing
the limited use of operating assistance in large UZAs are as follows:
(1) Section 5307(b)(1)(E) provides for grants for the operating
costs of equipment and facilities for use in public transportation in
the Evansville, IN-KY urbanized area, for a portion or portions of the
UZA if the portion of the UZA includes only one State, the population
of the portion is less than 30,000, and the grants will be not used to
provide public transportation outside of the portion of the UZA.
(2) Section 5307(b)(1)(F) provides operating costs of equipment and
facilities for use in public transportation for local governmental
authorities in areas which adopted transit operating and financing
plans that became a part of the Houston, Texas, UZA as a result of the
2000 decennial census of population, but lie outside the service area
of the principal public transportation agency that serves the Houston
UZA.
(3) Section 5336(a)(2) prescribes the formula to be used to
apportion Section 5307 funds to UZAs with population of 200,000 or
more. SAFETEA-LU amended 5336(a)(2) to add language that stated, ``* *
* except that the amount apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized area
under subsection (b) shall be available to the Alaska Railroad for any
costs related to its passenger operations.'' This language has the
effect of directing that funds apportioned to the Anchorage urbanized
area, under the fixed guideway tiers of the Section 5307 apportionment
formula, be made available to the Alaska Railroad, and that these funds
may be used for any capital or operating costs related to its passenger
operations.
(4) Section 3027(c)(3) of TEA-21, as amended (49 U.S.C. 5307 note),
provides an exception to the restriction on the use of operating
assistance in a UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, by allowing
transit providers/grantees that provide service exclusively to elderly
persons and persons with disabilities and that operate 20 or fewer
vehicles to use Section 5307 funds apportioned to the UZA for operating
assistance. The total amount of funding made available for this purpose
under Section 3027(c)(3) is $1.4 million. Transit providers/grantees
eligible under this provision have already been identified and
notified.
(5) Pursuant to the SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act, 2008, in
FY 2009, section 5307(b)(2) allows (1) UZAs that grew in population
from under 200,000 to over 200,000 or that were under 200,000 but
merged into another urbanized area and the population is over 200,000,
as a result of the 2000 Census to use Section 5307 funds for operating
assistance in an amount up to 50 percent of the grandfathered amount
for FY 2002 funds; (2) Areas that were nonurbanized under the 1990
Census and became urbanized, as a result of the 2000 Census, to use no
more than 50 percent of the amount apportioned to the area for FY 2003
for operating assistance; and (3) nonurbanized areas under the 1990
Census that merged into urbanized areas over 200,000, as a result of
the 2000 Census, to use 50 percent of the amount the area received in
FY 2002 Section 5311 funding for operating assistance.
e. Sources of Local Match
Pursuant to Section 5307(e), the Federal share of an urbanized area
formula grant is 80 percent of net project cost for a capital project
and 50 percent of net project cost for operating assistance unless the
recipients project a greater local share. The remainder of the net
project cost (i.e., 20 percent and 50 percent, respectively) shall be
provided from the following sources:
1. In cash from non-Government sources other than revenues from
providing public transportation services;
2. From revenues derived from the sale of advertising and
concessions;
3. From an undistributed cash surplus, a replacement or
depreciation cash fund or reserve, or new capital;
4. From amounts received under a service agreement with a State or
local social service agency or private social service organization; and
5. Proceeds from the issuance of revenue bonds.
In addition, funds from Section 403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be used to match
Urbanized Area Formula funds.
f. Designated Transportation Management Areas (TMA)
Guidance for setting the boundaries of TMAs is in the joint
transportation planning regulations codified at 23 CFR Part 450 as
reference in 49 CFR Part 613. In some cases, the TMA planning
boundaries established by the MPO for the designated TMA includes one
or more small UZAs. In addition, one small UZA (Santa Barbara, CA) has
been designated as a TMA. In either of these situations, the Governor
cannot allocate ``Governor's Apportionment'' funds attributed to the
small UZAs to other areas; that is, the Governor only has discretion to
allocate Governor's Apportionment funds attributable to areas that are
outside of designated TMA planning boundaries.
The list of small UZAs included within the planning boundaries of
[[Page 77351]]
designated TMAs is provided in the table below.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small urbanized area included in TMA
Designated TMA planning boundary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albany, NY.................. Saratoga Springs, NY.
Houston, TX................. Galveston, TX; Lake Jackson-Angleton, TX;
Texas City, TX; The Woodlands, TX.
Jacksonville, FL............ St. Augustine, FL.
Orlando, FL................. Kissimmee, FL.
Palm Bay-Melbourne, FL...... Titusville, FL.
Philadelphia, PA-NJ-DE-MD... Pottstown, PA.
Pittsburg, PA............... Monessen, PA; Weirton, WV-Steubenville,
OH-PA (PA portion); Uniontown-
Connellsville, PA.
Seattle, WA................. Bremerton, WA.
Washington, DC-VA-MD........ Frederick, MD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MPO must notify the Associate Administrator for Program
Management, Federal Transit Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590, in writing, no later than July 1 of each
year, to identify any small UZA within the planning boundaries of a
TMA.
g. Urbanized Area Formula Funds Used for Highway Purposes
Funds apportioned to a TMA are eligible for transfer to FHWA for
highway projects, if the Designated Recipient has allocated a portion
of the areas section 5307 funding for such use. However, before funds
can be transferred, the following conditions must be met: (1) Such use
must be approved by the MPO in writing, after appropriate notice and
opportunity for comment and appeal are provided to affected transit
providers; (2) in the determination of the Secretary, such funds are
not needed for investments required by the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (ADA); and (3) the MPO determines that local transit needs
are being addressed.
The MPO should notify the appropriate FTA Regional Administrator of
its intent to use FTA funds for highway purposes, as prescribed in
section V.D below. Urbanized Area Formula funds that are designated by
the MPO for highway projects will be transferred to and administered by
FHWA.
4. Period of Availability
The Urbanized Area Formula Program funds apportioned in this notice
remain available to be obligated during the year of appropriation plus
three additional years. Accordingly, these funds must be obligated by
FTA to recipients by September 30, 2012. Any of these apportioned funds
that remain unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2012,
will revert to FTA for reapportionment under the Urbanized Area Formula
Program.
5. Other Program or Apportionment Related Information and Highlights
In each UZA with a population of 200,000 or more, the Governor in
consultation with responsible local officials, and publicly owned
operators of public transportation has designated one or more entities
to be the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 funds apportioned to
the UZA. The same entity(s) may or may not be the Designated Recipient
for the Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom program
funds apportioned to the UZA. In UZAs under 200,000 in population, the
State is the Designated Recipient for Section 5307 as well as JARC and
New Freedom programs. The Designated Recipient for Section 5307 may
authorize other entities to apply directly to FTA for Section 5307
grants pursuant to a supplemental agreement. While the requirement that
projects selected for funding be included in a locally developed
coordinated public transit/human service transportation plan is not
included in Section 5307 as it is in Sections 5310, 5316 (JARC) and
5317 (New Freedom), FTA expects that in their role as public transit
providers, recipients of Section 5307 funds will be participants in the
local planning process for these programs.
D. Clean Fuels Grant Program (49 U.S.C. 5308)
The Clean Fuels Grant Program supports the use of alternative fuels
in air quality maintenance or nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon
monoxide through capital grants to urbanized areas for clean fuel
vehicles and facilities. Previously an unfunded Formula Program under
TEA-21, the program is now a discretionary program. For more
information about this program, contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of
Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, provides $21,074,900 to
the Clean Fuels Grant Program (49 U.S.C. 5308). FTA will publish
project allocations in a supplemental notice when all program funds
have been made available.
2. Requirements
Clean Fuels program funds may be made available to any grantee in a
UZA that is designated as maintenance or nonattainment area for ozone
or carbon monoxide as defined in the Clean Air Act. Eligible recipients
include Section 5307 Designated Recipients as well as recipients in
small UZAs. In the case of a small UZA, the State in which the area is
located will act as the recipient.
Eligible projects include the purchase or lease of clean fuel buses
(including buses that employ a lightweight composite primary
structure), the construction or lease of clean fuel buses or electrical
recharging facilities and related equipment for such buses, and
construction or improvement of public transportation facilities to
accommodate clean fuel buses.
Legislation will be necessary if a recipient wishes to use Clean
Fuels funds earmarked in SAFETEA-LU for eligible program activities
outside the scope of a project description.
Unless otherwise specified in law, grants made under the Clean
Fuels program must meet all other eligibility requirements as outlined
in Section 5308.
3. Period of Availability
Funds designated for specific Clean Fuels Program projects remain
available for obligation for three fiscal years, which includes the
year of appropriation plus two additional fiscal years. The FY 2009
funding for projects will remain available through September 30, 2011.
Clean Fuels funds not obligated in an FTA grant for eligible purposes
at the end of the period of availability will generally be made
available for other projects.
[[Page 77352]]
5. Other Program or Allocation Related Information and Highlights
Prior year unobligated balances for Clean Fuel allocations in the
amount of $46,862,483 remain available for obligation in FY 2009. This
includes $6,690,000 in FY 2007 and $40,172,483 in FY 2008 unobligated
allocations. The unobligated amounts available as of September 30,
2008, are displayed in Table 7.
E. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Fixed Guideway
Modernization
This program provides capital assistance for the modernization of
existing fixed guideway systems. Funds are allocated by a statutory
formula to UZAs with fixed guideway systems that have been in operation
for at least seven years. A ``fixed guideway'' refers to any transit
service that uses exclusive or controlled rights-of-way or rails,
entirely or in part. The term includes heavy rail, commuter rail, light
rail, monorail, trolleybus, aerial tramway, inclined plane, cable car,
automated guideway transit, ferryboats, that portion of motor bus
service operated on exclusive or controlled rights-of-way, and high-
occupancy-vehicle (HOV) lanes. Eligible applicants are the public
transit authorities in those urbanized areas to which the funds are
allocated. For more information about Fixed Guideway Modernization
contact Scott Faulk, Office of Transit Programs, at (202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, provides $675,257,000 to
the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program. The total amount apportioned
for the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program is $668,504,430, after the
deduction for oversight, and addition of prior year reapportioned
funds, as shown in the table below.
Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Appropriation................................... $675,257,000
Oversight Deduction................................... -6,752,570
-----------------
Total Apportioned................................. 668,504,430
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FY 2009 Fixed Guideway Modernization Program apportionments to
eligible areas are displayed in Table 8.
2. Basis for Formula Apportionment
The formula for allocating the Fixed Guideway Modernization funds
contains seven tiers. The apportionment of funding under the first four
tiers is based on amounts specified in law and NTD data used to
apportion funds in FY 1997. Funding under the last three tiers is
apportioned based on the latest available data on route miles and
revenue vehicle miles on segments at least seven years old, as reported
to the NTD. Section 5337(f) of title 49, U.S.C. provides for the
inclusion of Morgantown, West Virginia (population 55,997) as an
eligible UZA for purposes of apportioning fixed guideway modernization
funds. Also, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5336(b) FTA used 60 percent of the
directional route miles attributable to the Alaska Railroad passenger
operations system to calculate the apportionment for the Anchorage,
Alaska UZA under the Section 5309 Fixed Guideway Modernization formula.
FY 2009 Formula apportionments are based on data grantees provided
to the NTD for the 2007 reporting year. Table 9 provides additional
information and details on the formula. Dollar unit values for the
formula factors used in the Fixed Guideway Modernization Program are
displayed in Table 5. To replicate an area's apportionment, multiply
the dollar unit value by the appropriate formula factor, i.e., route
miles and revenue vehicle miles.
3. Program Requirements
Fixed Guideway Modernization funds must be used for capital
projects to maintain, modernize, or improve fixed guideway systems.
Eligible UZAs (those with a population of 200,000 or more) with fixed
guideway systems that are at least seven years old are entitled to
receive Fixed Guideway Modernization funds. A threshold level of more
than one mile of fixed guideway is required in order to receive Fixed
Guideway Modernization funds. Therefore, UZAs reporting one mile or
less of fixed guideway mileage under the NTD are not included. However,
funds apportioned to an urbanized area may be used on any fixed
guideway segment in the UZA. Program guidance for Fixed Guideway
Modernization is presently found in FTA Circular C9300.1B, Capital
Facilities and Formula Grant Programs, dated November 1, 2008.
4. Period of Availability
The funds apportioned in this notice under the Fixed Guideway
Modernization Program remain available to be obligated by FTA to
recipients during the year of appropriation plus three additional
years. FY 2009 Fixed Guideway Modernization funds that remain
unobligated at the close of business on September 30, 2012, will revert
to FTA for reapportionment under the Fixed Guideway Modernization
Program.
F. Capital Investment Program (49 U.S.C. 5309)--Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities
This program provides capital assistance for new and replacement
buses, and related equipment and facilities. Funds are allocated on a
discretionary basis. Eligible purposes are acquisition of buses for
fleet and service expansion, bus maintenance and administrative
facilities, transfer facilities, bus malls, transportation centers,
intermodal terminals, park-and-ride stations, acquisition of
replacement vehicles, bus rebuilds, bus preventive maintenance,
passenger amenities such as passenger shelters and bus stop signs,
accessory and miscellaneous equipment such as mobile radio units,
supervisory vehicles, fare boxes, computers, and shop and garage
equipment. Eligible applicants are State and local governmental
authorities. Eligible subrecipients include other public agencies,
private companies engaged in public transportation and private non-
profit organizations. For more information about Bus and Bus-Related
Facilities contact Kimberly Sledge, Office of Transit Programs, at
(202) 366-2053.
1. FY 2009 Funding Availability
The Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009, provides $350,455,128 for
the Bus and Bus-Related Facilities program. FTA will publish project
allocations in a supplemental notice when all program funds have been
made available.
The SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act of 2008 extended funds
made available for FY 2006 SAFTETEA-LU projects number 176 and 652.
Funds for these projects remain available until September 30, 2009 and
are shown in Table 10.
2. Requirements
FTA honors Congressional earmarks for the purpose designated, for
purposes eligible under the program or under the expanded eligibility
of a ``notwithstanding'' provision. Projects designated for funding in
the report language accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2008, were incorporated as earmarks into the Act by reference. FTA will
tre