Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Sweden: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75395-75396 [E8-29385]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 239 / Thursday, December 11, 2008 / Notices
751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act): (1) The cash deposit
rate for CP Kelco will be the rate
established in the final results of this
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this review but covered in the
original less-than-fair-value
investigation or previous reviews, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this or any
previous review or the less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous review
conducted by the Department, the cash
deposit rate will be the all-others rate of
14.57 percent from the LTFV
investigation. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Orders: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,
Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden,
70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005). These cash
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation that is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:27 Dec 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
Dated: December 4, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Background
Appendix I—Comment in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum:
Comment 1: Whether to Increase CP Kelco
B.V.’s Costs of Production for Shut-down
Costs Incurred by its Swedish Affiliate.
[FR Doc. E8–29384 Filed 12–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–401–808]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From
Sweden: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 6, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (Department)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on purified
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from
Sweden. See Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Sweden:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
45703 (August 6, 2008) (Preliminary
Results). The merchandise covered by
this order is purified CMC as described
in the ‘‘Scope of the Order’’ section of
this notice. The period of review (POR)
is July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007.
In our Preliminary Results, we invited
parties to comment. We received
comments from interested parties and,
consequently, have made changes to our
calculation based on our analysis of the
comments received. Therefore, the final
results differ from those published in
the Department’s Preliminary Results.
The final weighted-average dumping
margin for the reviewed firm is listed
below in the section titled ‘‘Final
Results of the Review.’’
DATES:
Effective Date: December 11,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Edwards or Angelica Mendoza,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–8029 or (202) 482–
3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75395
On August 6, 2008, the Department
published the preliminary results of
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order covering
purified CMC from Sweden. See
Preliminary Results. The parties subject
to this review are CP Kelco A.B. and its
U.S. affiliate, CP Kelco U.S., Inc.
(collectively, CP Kelco). The petitioner
in this proceeding is The Aqualon
Company, a division of Hercules
Incorporated (Petitioner).
We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results. On
September 5, 2008, Petitioner filed
comments on the Preliminary Results.
See Letter from Haynes & Boone, LLP,
regarding ‘‘Request for a Public Hearing
and Comment in Lieu of a Formal Case
Brief,’’ dated September 5, 2008. Also
on September 5, 2008, CP Kelco
submitted comments on the Preliminary
Results. See Letter from Arent Fox LLP,
regarding ‘‘Comments Regarding August
6, 2008 Preliminary Results of Review,’’
dated September 5, 2008. On September
11, 2008, CP Kelco filed its rebuttal to
Petitioner’s September 5, 2008,
submission. See Letter from Arent Fox
LLP, regarding ‘‘Rebuttal Brief of CP
Kelco AB,’’ dated September 11, 2008.
Petitioner did not submit a rebuttal
brief. On September 11, 2008, Petitioner
subsequently contacted Department
officials and withdrew its request for a
public hearing. See Memorandum to the
File from Robert James, Program
Manager, titled ‘‘Withdrawal of
Petitioner’s Request for Hearing,’’ dated
September 11, 2008.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is all purified CMC, sometimes also
referred to as purified sodium CMC,
polyanionic cellulose, or cellulose gum,
which is a white to off-white, non-toxic,
odorless, biodegradable powder,
comprising sodium CMC that has been
refined and purified to a minimum
assay of 90 percent. Purified CMC does
not include unpurified or crude CMC,
CMC Fluidized Polymer Suspensions,
and CMC that is cross-linked through
heat treatment. Purified CMC is CMC
that has undergone one or more
purification operations which, at a
minimum, reduce the remaining salt
and other by-product portion of the
product to less than ten percent. The
merchandise subject to the order is
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States at
subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff
classification is provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
75396
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 239 / Thursday, December 11, 2008 / Notices
however, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
‘‘Memorandum to the Assistant
Secretary: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Sweden,’’
dated December 4, 2008 (Issues and
Decision Memorandum), which is
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of
the issues raised, all of which are in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is
attached to this notice as Appendix I.
Parties can find a complete discussion
of all issues raised in the briefs and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file in
the Central Records Unit (CRU), room
1117 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Web at https://
www.trade.gov/ia/. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received from
the interested parties, we have made
one change to the margin calculation for
CP Kelco, to correct for a clerical error
made at the Preliminary Results with
regard to certain constructed export
price sales that were inadvertently
removed from our overall margin
calculation. For a discussion of the
change which the Department has made
to the margin calculation for CP Kelco,
see ‘‘Memorandum to the File:
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
on Purified Carboxymethylcellulose for
CP Kelco AB (CP Kelco),’’ dated
December 4, 2008. A public version of
this memorandum is on file in the CRU.
on all appropriate entries. In accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the
Department calculates an assessment
rate for each importer of the subject
merchandise. CP Kelco has reported
entered values for all of its sales of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR. Therefore, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
we have calculated importer-specific
duty assessment rates on the basis of the
ratio of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for the examined sales
to the total entered value of the
examined sales of that importer. These
rates will be assessed uniformly on all
entries the respective importers made
during the POR. Where the assessment
rate is above de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to assess duties on all
entries of subject merchandise by that
importer. The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions directly to
CBP 15 days after publication of these
final results of review.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by reviewed
companies for which these companies
did not know their merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
this notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of purified CMC from Sweden entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided by section
751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Final Results of the Review
amended (the Act): (1) The cash deposit
rate for CP Kelco will be the rate
We determine the following
established in the final results of this
percentage weighted-average margin
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
exists for the period July 1, 2006,
manufacturers or exporters not covered
through June 30, 2007:
in this review but covered in the
original less-than-fair-value
Weighted average
investigation or previous reviews, the
Manufacturer/exporter
margin
(percentage)
cash-deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
CP Kelco A.B. ...............
5.88
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review or the
Assessment
less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
The Department shall determine, and
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
established for the most recent period
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:27 Dec 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous review
conducted by the Department, the cash
deposit rate will be the all-others rate of
25.29 percent from the LTFV
investigation. See Notice of
Antidumping Duty Orders: Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland,
Mexico, the Netherlands and Sweden,
70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005). These cash
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation that is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: December 4, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I—Comments in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Inclusion of Shut-down Costs in
CP Kelco’s Cost of Production.
Comment 2: Correction for Ministerial Errors.
[FR Doc. E8–29385 Filed 12–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 239 (Thursday, December 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75395-75396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29385]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-401-808]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Sweden: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 6, 2008, the Department of Commerce (Department)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on purified carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) from
Sweden. See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Sweden: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 45703 (August
6, 2008) (Preliminary Results). The merchandise covered by this order
is purified CMC as described in the ``Scope of the Order'' section of
this notice. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2006, through June
30, 2007. In our Preliminary Results, we invited parties to comment. We
received comments from interested parties and, consequently, have made
changes to our calculation based on our analysis of the comments
received. Therefore, the final results differ from those published in
the Department's Preliminary Results. The final weighted-average
dumping margin for the reviewed firm is listed below in the section
titled ``Final Results of the Review.''
DATES: Effective Date: December 11, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Edwards or Angelica Mendoza,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
8029 or (202) 482-3019, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 6, 2008, the Department published the preliminary results
of administrative review of the antidumping duty order covering
purified CMC from Sweden. See Preliminary Results. The parties subject
to this review are CP Kelco A.B. and its U.S. affiliate, CP Kelco U.S.,
Inc. (collectively, CP Kelco). The petitioner in this proceeding is The
Aqualon Company, a division of Hercules Incorporated (Petitioner).
We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results. On September 5, 2008, Petitioner filed comments on the
Preliminary Results. See Letter from Haynes & Boone, LLP, regarding
``Request for a Public Hearing and Comment in Lieu of a Formal Case
Brief,'' dated September 5, 2008. Also on September 5, 2008, CP Kelco
submitted comments on the Preliminary Results. See Letter from Arent
Fox LLP, regarding ``Comments Regarding August 6, 2008 Preliminary
Results of Review,'' dated September 5, 2008. On September 11, 2008, CP
Kelco filed its rebuttal to Petitioner's September 5, 2008, submission.
See Letter from Arent Fox LLP, regarding ``Rebuttal Brief of CP Kelco
AB,'' dated September 11, 2008. Petitioner did not submit a rebuttal
brief. On September 11, 2008, Petitioner subsequently contacted
Department officials and withdrew its request for a public hearing. See
Memorandum to the File from Robert James, Program Manager, titled
``Withdrawal of Petitioner's Request for Hearing,'' dated September 11,
2008.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is all purified CMC, sometimes
also referred to as purified sodium CMC, polyanionic cellulose, or
cellulose gum, which is a white to off-white, non-toxic, odorless,
biodegradable powder, comprising sodium CMC that has been refined and
purified to a minimum assay of 90 percent. Purified CMC does not
include unpurified or crude CMC, CMC Fluidized Polymer Suspensions, and
CMC that is cross-linked through heat treatment. Purified CMC is CMC
that has undergone one or more purification operations which, at a
minimum, reduce the remaining salt and other by-product portion of the
product to less than ten percent. The merchandise subject to the order
is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at
subheading 3912.31.00. This tariff classification is provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
[[Page 75396]]
however, the written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the ``Memorandum to the Assistant Secretary: Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Sweden,'' dated December
4, 2008 (Issues and Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by
this notice. A list of the issues raised, all of which are in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as Appendix
I. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in the
briefs and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum
which is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room 1117 of the
main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version
of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
Web at https://www.trade.gov/ia/. The paper copy and electronic version
of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.[FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/NO][DATE]*[/
DATE][NOTICES][NOTICE][PREAMB][AGENCY]*[/AGENCY][SUBJECT]*[/SUBJECT][/
PREAMB][SUPLINF][HED]*[/HED]
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received from the interested parties, we have
made one change to the margin calculation for CP Kelco, to correct for
a clerical error made at the Preliminary Results with regard to certain
constructed export price sales that were inadvertently removed from our
overall margin calculation. For a discussion of the change which the
Department has made to the margin calculation for CP Kelco, see
``Memorandum to the File: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Purified Carboxymethylcellulose for CP Kelco
AB (CP Kelco),'' dated December 4, 2008. A public version of this
memorandum is on file in the CRU.
Final Results of the Review
We determine the following percentage weighted-average margin
exists for the period July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average
Manufacturer/exporter margin
(percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CP Kelco A.B........................................ 5.88
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department
calculates an assessment rate for each importer of the subject
merchandise. CP Kelco has reported entered values for all of its sales
of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. Therefore,
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated importer-
specific duty assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total
amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the
total entered value of the examined sales of that importer. These rates
will be assessed uniformly on all entries the respective importers made
during the POR. Where the assessment rate is above de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to assess duties on all entries of subject merchandise by
that importer. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions
directly to CBP 15 days after publication of these final results of
review.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by reviewed companies for which
these companies did not know their merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6,
2003).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of this notice of final results of administrative review
for all shipments of purified CMC from Sweden entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as
provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act): (1) The cash deposit rate for CP Kelco will be the rate
established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but
covered in the original less-than-fair-value investigation or previous
reviews, the cash-deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific
rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review or the less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer
is a firm covered in this or any previous review conducted by the
Department, the cash deposit rate will be the all-others rate of 25.29
percent from the LTFV investigation. See Notice of Antidumping Duty
Orders: Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland, Mexico, the
Netherlands and Sweden, 70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005). These cash deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation that is
subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: December 4, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I--Comments in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Inclusion of Shut-down Costs in CP Kelco's Cost of
Production.
Comment 2: Correction for Ministerial Errors.
[FR Doc. E8-29385 Filed 12-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P