Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of the Administrative Review Pursuant to Final Court Decision, 74457-74458 [E8-29015]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 236 / Monday, December 8, 2008 / Notices
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: 2010 Census Coverage
Measurement Independent Listing
Operation.
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number(s): D–1302, D–
1302(PR).
Type of Request: New collection.
Burden Hours: 38,563.
Number of Respondents: 1,000,000.
Average Hours per Response: 2
minutes.
Needs and Uses: The U.S. Census
Bureau requests authorization from the
Office of Management and Budget to
conduct the Census Coverage
Measurement (CCM) Independent
Listing Operation as part of the 2010
Census. The 2010 CCM Independent
Listing Operation will be conducted in
the U.S. (excluding remote Alaska) and
in Puerto Rico, in selected CCM
sampled areas. As in the past, the CCM
operations and activities will be
conducted separate from and
independent of the 2010 Census
operations.
CCM will be conducted for the 2010
Census to provide estimates of net
coverage error and components of
coverage error (omissions and erroneous
enumerations) for housing units and
persons in housing units to improve
future censuses. The data collection and
matching methodologies for previous
coverage measurement programs were
designed only to measure net coverage
error, which reflects the difference
between omissions and erroneous
inclusions.
The Independent Listing Operation is
the first step in the CCM process. It will
be conducted to obtain a complete
inventory of all housing unit addresses
within the CCM sample block clusters
before the 2010 Census enumeration
commences. In those block clusters
throughout the 50 states (excluding
remote Alaska), the District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico, listers will
canvass every street, road, or other place
where people might live in their
assigned block clusters and construct a
list of housing units. Listers will contact
a member of each housing unit (or
proxy, as a last resort) to ensure all units
at a given address are identified. They
will also identify the location of each
housing unit by assigning map spots on
block maps provided with their
assignment materials.
Completed Independent Listing Books
are subject to Dependent Quality
Control (DQC) wherein DQC listers
return to the field to check 12 housing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Dec 05, 2008
Jkt 217001
units per block cluster from a prespecified random start to ensure that the
work performed is of acceptable quality
and to verify that the correct blocks
were visited. If the block cluster fails the
DQC, then the DQC lister reworks the
entire block cluster. The completed
listing books are keyed for matching
against the census Decennial Master
Address File for the same areas.
There will be two Independent Listing
Forms, D–1302 and D–1302 (PR). The
D–1302 is the English version of the
listing form and will be used in CCM
sample areas in the 50 states (excluding
remote Alaska) and the District of
Columbia. The D–1302 (PR) is the
Spanish version of the listing form and
will be used only in the CCM sample
areas in Puerto Rico.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: One time.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13, United
States Code, Section 141 authorizes the
Secretary of Commerce to conduct a
decennial census of the population, and
Section 193 authorizes the Secretary to
conduct tests to gather supplementary
information related to the census.
OMB Desk Officer: Brian HarrisKojetin, (202) 395–7314.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Brian Harris-Kojetin, OMB
Desk Officer either by fax (202–395–
7245) or e-mail (bharrisk@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: December 3, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–28911 Filed 12–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74457
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–848
Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s
Republic of China: Amended Final
Results of the Administrative Review
Pursuant to Final Court Decision
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 8, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Lindsay, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0780.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This matter arose from a challenge to
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the
People’s Republic of China; Notice of
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 68 FR 19504
(April 21, 2003) (Final Results) and
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum (Issues and Decision
Memo) covering the period of review
September 1, 2000, through August 31,
2001. In the Final Results, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) assigned China Kingdom
Import & Export Co., Ltd. (China
Kingdom) an antidumping duty
assessment rate based on total adverse
facts available because the evidence
gathered at verification established that
China Kingdom failed to report its total
tail meat production and eight of its
eleven factors of production for the
period of review. See Final Results.
Following publication of the Final
Results, China Kingdom filed a lawsuit
with the United States Court of
International Trade (CIT) challenging
the Department’s Final Results.
The CIT overturned the Department’s
determination in the Final Results to
assign to China Kingdom an
antidumping duty assessment rate based
on total adverse facts available. See
China Kingdom Import & Export Co.
Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No.
03–00302, Slip Op. 07–135 (CIT
September 4, 2007) (Remand Order). In
the Remand Order, the CIT directed the
Department to calculate and assign
China Kingdom a new antidumping
duty assessment rate in full compliance
with the CIT’s directives, and that the
Department support all its findings with
substantial record evidence and include
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
74458
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 236 / Monday, December 8, 2008 / Notices
a reasoned explanation for its
determination. Specifically, first, the
CIT ordered the Department to make a
determination as to the practicability of
allowing China Kingdom to explain the
deficient responses, that is required by
section 782(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), and, in doing so,
to afford China Kingdom a reasonable
opportunity to explain the deficiency
affecting the information on Chaohu
Daxin Foodstuff Co., Ltd.’s (Daxin) total
production and the calculated data for
eight of the eleven factors of production.
Second, the CIT specified that once
China Kingdom has provided its
explanation regarding the deficient
information, the Department must make
the determinations required by either
section 782(d)(1) or (2) of the Act, or
both, with respect to the substitute
information. Third, the CIT ordered that
the Department may use facts otherwise
available solely to determine the total
amount of Daxin’s production of subject
merchandise, and to calculate and
determine the eight incorrectly reported
factors of production during the period
of review. Lastly, the CIT instructed that
the Department may use adverse
inferences only to a limited extent, and
must demonstrate that the use of
adverse inferences is not punitive,
aberrational, or uncorroborated.
On February 1, 2008, the Department
released the draft final results of
redetermination for comment. No party
submitted comments by the February
11, 2008, deadline. On March 4, 2008,
the Department filed its final results of
redetermination pursuant to the CIT’s
order. See Results of Redetermination
on Remand Pursuant to China Kingdom
Import & Export Co., Ltd. v. United
States. In the remand results, pursuant
to the CIT’s order, the Department
recalculated China Kingdom’s margin
using adverse facts available only to a
limited extent. Specifically, the
Department only applied adverse facts
available to those factors which China
Kingdom incorrectly reported in its
responses. Therefore, for the remand
results, the Department utilized China
Kingdom’s correctly reported factors in
its margin calculation. On September
12, 2008, the CIT issued its judgment
affirming the Department’s remand
results.
On October 17, 2008, consistent with
the decision in Timken Co. v. United
States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990), the
Department notified the public that the
CIT’s decision was not in harmony with
Department’s final results. See Crawfish
Tail Meat from the People’s Republic of
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony with Final Results of
Administrative Review, 73 FR 61782
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Dec 05, 2008
Jkt 217001
(October 17, 2008). There was no appeal
of the CIT’s decision to the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Federal Circuit filed
within the appeal period. Therefore, the
CIT’s decision is now final and
conclusive.
Amended Final Results of the Review
As the litigation in this case has
concluded, the Department is amending
the Final Results to reflect the results of
our remand redetermination. The
revised dumping margin in the
amended final results is as follows:
Exporter/Manufacturer
Weighted–Average
Margin (Percent)
China Kingdom Import
& Export Co. Ltd. ......
90.66
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
liquidate entries of freshwater crawfish
tail meat from the People’s Republic of
China during the review period at the
assessment rate the Department
calculated for the final results of review
as amended. We intend to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these
amended final results of review.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
November 24, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–29015 Filed 12–5–08; 8:45 am]
CFR 102-3.65, and after consultation
with GSA, the Secretary of Commerce
has determined that the renewal of the
Exporters’ Textile Advisory Committee
is in the public interest in connection
with the performance of duties imposed
on the Department by law.
The Committee shall provide advice
and guidance to Department officials on
the identification and surmounting of
barriers to the expansion of textile
exports, and on methods of encouraging
textile firms to participate in export
expansion.
The Committee shall consist of
approximately 40 members appointed
by the Secretary of Commerce to ensure
a balanced representation of textile and
apparel products. Representatives of
small, medium and large firms with
broad geographical distribution in
exporting shall be included on the
Committee.
The Committee shall function solely
as an advisory body in compliance with
the provisions of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act.
Dated: December 2, 2008.
Janet E. Heinzen,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Textiles
and Apparel.
[FR Doc. E8–28980 Filed 12–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–813]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Exporters’ Textile Advisory Committee
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: Renewal of the Exporters’
Textile Advisory Committee (ETAC):
The ETAC is renewed for the period
October 1, 2008 - September 30, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet E. Heinzen, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Textiles and
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Room 3100, Washington, DC 20230
telephone: (202) 482-3737, e-mail:
matt.priest@mail.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION: In
accordance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5
U.S.C. App. 2, and the General Services
Administration (GSA) rule on Federal
Advisory Committee Management, 41
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Canned Pineapple Fruit From Thailand:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 6, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of its administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on canned
pineapple fruit (CPF) from Thailand.
See Canned Pineapple Fruit from
Thailand: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 73 FR 45695 (August 6, 2008)
(Preliminary Results). This review
covers one producer/exporter of the
subject merchandise to the United
States, Vita Food Factory (1989) Co.,
Ltd. (Vita). The period of review (POR)
is July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007.
Subsequent to the Preliminary Results,
we provided parties with an
opportunity to comment. No parties
submitted any comments. Therefore, the
final results do not differ from those
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 236 (Monday, December 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74457-74458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-29015]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-570-848
Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China: Amended
Final Results of the Administrative Review Pursuant to Final Court
Decision
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 8, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Lindsay, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0780.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This matter arose from a challenge to Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat
from the People's Republic of China; Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 68 FR 19504 (April 21, 2003)
(Final Results) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (Issues
and Decision Memo) covering the period of review September 1, 2000,
through August 31, 2001. In the Final Results, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) assigned China Kingdom Import & Export Co.,
Ltd. (China Kingdom) an antidumping duty assessment rate based on total
adverse facts available because the evidence gathered at verification
established that China Kingdom failed to report its total tail meat
production and eight of its eleven factors of production for the period
of review. See Final Results. Following publication of the Final
Results, China Kingdom filed a lawsuit with the United States Court of
International Trade (CIT) challenging the Department's Final Results.
The CIT overturned the Department's determination in the Final
Results to assign to China Kingdom an antidumping duty assessment rate
based on total adverse facts available. See China Kingdom Import &
Export Co. Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Ct. No. 03-00302, Slip Op.
07-135 (CIT September 4, 2007) (Remand Order). In the Remand Order, the
CIT directed the Department to calculate and assign China Kingdom a new
antidumping duty assessment rate in full compliance with the CIT's
directives, and that the Department support all its findings with
substantial record evidence and include
[[Page 74458]]
a reasoned explanation for its determination. Specifically, first, the
CIT ordered the Department to make a determination as to the
practicability of allowing China Kingdom to explain the deficient
responses, that is required by section 782(d) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), and, in doing so, to afford China Kingdom a
reasonable opportunity to explain the deficiency affecting the
information on Chaohu Daxin Foodstuff Co., Ltd.'s (Daxin) total
production and the calculated data for eight of the eleven factors of
production. Second, the CIT specified that once China Kingdom has
provided its explanation regarding the deficient information, the
Department must make the determinations required by either section
782(d)(1) or (2) of the Act, or both, with respect to the substitute
information. Third, the CIT ordered that the Department may use facts
otherwise available solely to determine the total amount of Daxin's
production of subject merchandise, and to calculate and determine the
eight incorrectly reported factors of production during the period of
review. Lastly, the CIT instructed that the Department may use adverse
inferences only to a limited extent, and must demonstrate that the use
of adverse inferences is not punitive, aberrational, or uncorroborated.
On February 1, 2008, the Department released the draft final
results of redetermination for comment. No party submitted comments by
the February 11, 2008, deadline. On March 4, 2008, the Department filed
its final results of redetermination pursuant to the CIT's order. See
Results of Redetermination on Remand Pursuant to China Kingdom Import &
Export Co., Ltd. v. United States. In the remand results, pursuant to
the CIT's order, the Department recalculated China Kingdom's margin
using adverse facts available only to a limited extent. Specifically,
the Department only applied adverse facts available to those factors
which China Kingdom incorrectly reported in its responses. Therefore,
for the remand results, the Department utilized China Kingdom's
correctly reported factors in its margin calculation. On September 12,
2008, the CIT issued its judgment affirming the Department's remand
results.
On October 17, 2008, consistent with the decision in Timken Co. v.
United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990), the Department notified
the public that the CIT's decision was not in harmony with Department's
final results. See Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Results of
Administrative Review, 73 FR 61782 (October 17, 2008). There was no
appeal of the CIT's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit filed within the appeal period. Therefore, the CIT's
decision is now final and conclusive.
Amended Final Results of the Review
As the litigation in this case has concluded, the Department is
amending the Final Results to reflect the results of our remand
redetermination. The revised dumping margin in the amended final
results is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-Average
Exporter/Manufacturer Margin (Percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
China Kingdom Import & Export Co. Ltd............... 90.66
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to liquidate entries of freshwater crawfish tail meat from the
People's Republic of China during the review period at the assessment
rate the Department calculated for the final results of review as
amended. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these amended final results of review.
This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
November 24, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-29015 Filed 12-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S