Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand, 72834-72836 [E8-28409]
Download as PDF
72834
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Notices
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on July 1, 2008 (73 FR 37489)
and determined on October 6, 2008 that
it would conduct an expedited review
(73 FR 62318, October 20, 2008).
The Commission transmitted its
determination in this review to the
Secretary of Commerce on November
25, 2008. The views of the Commission
are contained in USITC Publication
4047 (November 2008), entitled
Crawfish Tail Meat from China:
Investigation No. 731–TA–752 (Second
Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 25, 2008.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–28410 Filed 11–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–432 and 731–
TA–1024–1028 (Review) and AA1921–188
(Third Review)]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand From Brazil, India, Japan,
Korea, Mexico, and Thailand
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews
concerning the countervailing duty
order on prestressed concrete steel wire
strand from India and antidumping duty
orders on prestressed concrete steel wire
strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea,
Mexico, and Thailand.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act)
to determine whether revocation of the
countervailing duty order on prestressed
concrete steel wire strand from India
and the antidumping duty orders on
prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico,
and Thailand would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of
the Act, interested parties are requested
to respond to this notice by submitting
the information specified below to the
Commission;1 to be assured of
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 09–5–192,
expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Nov 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
consideration, the deadline for
responses is January 20, 2009.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
February 13, 2009. For further
information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and
F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On December 8, 1978,
the Department of the Treasury issued
an antidumping finding on imports of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from Japan (43 FR 57599). Following
five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective February 3, 1999,
Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from Japan (64 FR 40554, July 27, 1999).
Following second five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective June 25, 2004, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from Japan (69 FR 35584). On January
28, 2004, the Department of Commerce
issued antidumping duty orders on
imports of prestressed concrete steel
wire strand from Brazil, India, Korea,
Mexico, and Thailand (69 FR 4109–
4113). On February 4, 2004, the
Department of Commerce issued a
countervailing duty order on imports of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from India (69 FR 5319). The
Commission is now conducting a third
review of the antidumping duty order
concerning Japan and a first review of
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC
20436.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the orders concerning Brazil, India,
Korea, Mexico, and Thailand to
determine whether revocation of the
orders would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to the domestic industry within
a reasonably foreseeable time. It will
assess the adequacy of interested party
responses to this notice of institution to
determine whether to conduct full
reviews or expedited reviews. The
Commission’s determinations in any
expedited reviews will be based on the
facts available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year reviews, as
defined by the Department of
Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these
reviews are Brazil, India, Japan, Korea,
Mexico, and Thailand.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its expedited
first and second five-year reviews of the
antidumping duty order concerning
Japan, the Commission found that the
appropriate definition of the Domestic
Like Product was the same as
Commerce’s scope: all steel wire strand,
other than alloy steel, not galvanized,
which has been stress-relieved and is
suitable for use in prestressed concrete.
The Commission did not make a like
product determination per se in its
original determination concerning
Japan. In its original determinations
concerning Brazil, India, Korea, Mexico,
and Thailand, the Commission found
the Domestic Like Product to be all
prestressed concrete steel wire strand
co-extensive with Commerce’s scope,
that is, steel strand produced from wire
of non-stainless, non-galvanized steel
that is suitable for use in prestressed
concrete (both pre-tensioned and posttensioned) applications and that
encompasses covered and uncovered
strand and all types, grades, and
diameters of prestressed concrete steel
wire strand.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original determination
and its expedited first and second
reviews of the antidumping duty order
concerning Japan, the Commission
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Notices
defined the Domestic Industry as all
producers of prestressed concrete steel
wire strand. Likewise, in its original
determinations concerning Brazil, India,
Korea, Mexico, and Thailand, the
Commission found the Domestic
Industry to be all producers of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand.
The Commission also determined that
plastic coating did not constitute
sufficient production-related activity to
qualify coaters as members of the
domestic industry producing
prestressed concrete steel wire strand.
(5) The Order Date is the date that the
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders under review became effective. In
the review concerning the antidumping
duty order on prestressed concrete steel
wire strand from Japan, the Order Date
is December 8, 1978. In the reviews
concerning the antidumping duty orders
on prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from Brazil, India, Korea, Mexico, and
Thailand, the Order Date is January 28,
2004. In the review concerning the
countervailing duty order on prestressed
concrete steel wire strand from India,
the Order Date is February 4, 2004.
(6) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the reviews and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the reviews as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they
may appear in a review even if they
participated personally and
substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation. The
Commission’s designated agency ethics
official recently has advised that a fiveyear review is no longer considered the
‘‘same particular matter’’ as the
corresponding underlying original
investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
207, the post employment statute for
Federal employees, and Commission
rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 73 FR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Nov 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice was
developed in consultation with the
Office of Government Ethics.
Consequently, former employees are no
longer required to seek Commission
approval to appear in a review under
Commission rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if
the corresponding underlying original
investigation was pending when they
were Commission employees. For
further ethics advice on this matter,
contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy
Agency Ethics Official, at 202–205–
3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in these reviews available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the reviews. A
separate service list will be maintained
by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the
APO.
Certification.—Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with these
reviews must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
will be deemed to consent, unless
otherwise specified, for the
Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the
information provided in any other
reviews or investigations of the same or
comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of
the Act, or in internal audits and
investigations relating to the programs
and operations of the Commission
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.—Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is January 20, 2009.
Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as
specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments
concerning the adequacy of responses to
the notice of institution and whether the
Commission should conduct expedited
or full reviews. The deadline for filing
such comments is February 13, 2009.
All written submissions must conform
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72835
with the provisions of sections 201.8
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules and
any submissions that contain BPI must
also conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing of
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in
accordance with sections 201.16(c) and
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each
document filed by a party to the reviews
must be served on all other parties to
the reviews (as identified by either the
public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the reviews you do not
need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested
information.—Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information to be Provided in
Response to This Notice of Institution: If
you are a domestic producer, union/
worker group, or trade/business
association; import/export Subject
Merchandise from more than one
Subject Country; or produce Subject
Merchandise in more than one Subject
Country, you may file a single response.
If you do so, please ensure that your
response to each question includes the
information requested for each pertinent
Subject Country. As used below, the
term ‘‘firm’’ includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address if available) and name,
telephone number, fax number, and email address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of
the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union
or worker group, a U.S. importer of the
Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer
or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
72836
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Notices
association, or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in these reviews by providing
information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on the
Domestic Industry in general and/or
your firm/entity specifically. In your
response, please discuss the various
factors specified in section 752(a) of the
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the
likely volume of subject imports, likely
price effects of subject imports, and
likely impact of imports of Subject
Merchandise on the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in each Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries after
2002.
(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during
calendar year 2007 (report quantity data
in pounds and value data in U.S.
dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/
worker group or trade/business
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms in
which your workers are employed/
which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) The quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s); and
(c) The quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country(ies), provide
the following information on your
firm’s(s’) operations on that product
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:47 Nov 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
during calendar year 2007 (report
quantity data in pounds and value data
in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties)
of U.S. imports and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total U.S.
imports of Subject Merchandise from
each Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping and/or
countervailing duties) of U.S.
commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from each
Subject Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping and/or
countervailing duties) of U.S. internal
consumption/company transfers of
Subject Merchandise imported from
each Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following
information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2007 (report quantity data
in pounds and value data in U.S.
dollars, landed and duty-paid at the
U.S. port but not including antidumping
or countervailing duties). If you are a
trade/business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in each Subject Country accounted for
by your firm’s(s’) production; and
(b) The quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from each Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
each Subject Country after 2002, and
significant changes, if any, that are
likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in each Subject
Country, and such merchandise from
other countries.
(11) (Optional) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 25, 2008.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–28409 Filed 11–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–394–A & 399–
A (Second Review) (Remand)]
Ball Bearings From Japan and the
United Kingdom
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of stay of remand
proceedings.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby
gives notice of the stay of its remand
proceedings in the Commission’s fiveyear reviews of the antidumping duty
orders on ball bearings from Japan and
the United Kingdom.
DATES: Effective Date: November 24,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Russell Duncan, Office of Investigations,
telephone 202–708–4727, or David
Goldfine, Office of General Counsel,
telephone 202–708–5452, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 231 (Monday, December 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72834-72836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28409]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-432 and 731-TA-1024-1028 (Review) and
AA1921-188 (Third Review)]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Brazil, India, Japan,
Korea, Mexico, and Thailand
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Institution of five-year reviews concerning the countervailing
duty order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from India and
antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete steel wire strand from
Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted
reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the
countervailing duty order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from India and the antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete
steel wire strand from Brazil, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and
Thailand would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested
parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the
information specified below to the Commission;\1\ to be assured of
consideration, the deadline for responses is January 20, 2009. Comments
on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by
February 13, 2009. For further information concerning the conduct of
these reviews and rules of general application, consult the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19
CFR part 207).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117-0016/USITC No. 09-5-192,
expiration date June 30, 2011. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send
comments regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On December 8, 1978, the Department of the Treasury
issued an antidumping finding on imports of prestressed concrete steel
wire strand from Japan (43 FR 57599). Following five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission, effective February 3, 1999, Commerce
issued a continuation of the antidumping duty order on imports of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Japan (64 FR 40554, July
27, 1999). Following second five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective June 25, 2004, Commerce issued a continuation of
the antidumping duty order on imports of prestressed concrete steel
wire strand from Japan (69 FR 35584). On January 28, 2004, the
Department of Commerce issued antidumping duty orders on imports of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Brazil, India, Korea,
Mexico, and Thailand (69 FR 4109-4113). On February 4, 2004, the
Department of Commerce issued a countervailing duty order on imports of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand from India (69 FR 5319). The
Commission is now conducting a third review of the antidumping duty
order concerning Japan and a first review of the orders concerning
Brazil, India, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand to determine whether
revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within a
reasonably foreseeable time. It will assess the adequacy of interested
party responses to this notice of institution to determine whether to
conduct full reviews or expedited reviews. The Commission's
determinations in any expedited reviews will be based on the facts
available, which may include information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions.--The following definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year reviews, as defined by the Department
of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these reviews are Brazil, India,
Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its
expedited first and second five-year reviews of the antidumping duty
order concerning Japan, the Commission found that the appropriate
definition of the Domestic Like Product was the same as Commerce's
scope: all steel wire strand, other than alloy steel, not galvanized,
which has been stress-relieved and is suitable for use in prestressed
concrete. The Commission did not make a like product determination per
se in its original determination concerning Japan. In its original
determinations concerning Brazil, India, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand,
the Commission found the Domestic Like Product to be all prestressed
concrete steel wire strand co-extensive with Commerce's scope, that is,
steel strand produced from wire of non-stainless, non-galvanized steel
that is suitable for use in prestressed concrete (both pre-tensioned
and post-tensioned) applications and that encompasses covered and
uncovered strand and all types, grades, and diameters of prestressed
concrete steel wire strand.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original determination and
its expedited first and second reviews of the antidumping duty order
concerning Japan, the Commission
[[Page 72835]]
defined the Domestic Industry as all producers of prestressed concrete
steel wire strand. Likewise, in its original determinations concerning
Brazil, India, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand, the Commission found the
Domestic Industry to be all producers of prestressed concrete steel
wire strand. The Commission also determined that plastic coating did
not constitute sufficient production-related activity to qualify
coaters as members of the domestic industry producing prestressed
concrete steel wire strand.
(5) The Order Date is the date that the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders under review became effective. In the review
concerning the antidumping duty order on prestressed concrete steel
wire strand from Japan, the Order Date is December 8, 1978. In the
reviews concerning the antidumping duty orders on prestressed concrete
steel wire strand from Brazil, India, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand, the
Order Date is January 28, 2004. In the review concerning the
countervailing duty order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand
from India, the Order Date is February 4, 2004.
(6) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the reviews and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the reviews as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the reviews.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if
they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation. The Commission's designated agency
ethics official recently has advised that a five-year review is no
longer considered the ``same particular matter'' as the corresponding
underlying original investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the
post employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule
201.15(b) (19 CFR 201.15(b)), 73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). This advice
was developed in consultation with the Office of Government Ethics.
Consequently, former employees are no longer required to seek
Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR
201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation was
pending when they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice
on this matter, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics
Official, at 202-205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI submitted in these reviews available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the reviews, provided that the
application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent
interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
the reviews. A separate service list will be maintained by the
Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification.--Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in
connection with these reviews must certify that the information is
accurate and complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter will be deemed to consent,
unless otherwise specified, for the Commission, its employees, and
contract personnel to use the information provided in any other reviews
or investigations of the same or comparable products which the
Commission conducts under Title VII of the Act, or in internal audits
and investigations relating to the programs and operations of the
Commission pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3.
Written submissions.--Pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission's rules, each interested party response to this notice must
provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such
responses is January 20, 2009. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission's rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of
responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission
should conduct expedited or full reviews. The deadline for filing such
comments is February 13, 2009. All written submissions must conform
with the provisions of sections 201.8 and 207.3 of the Commission's
rules and any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6 and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The
Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the
Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent
permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR
68036 (November 8, 2002). Also, in accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document filed by a party to
the reviews must be served on all other parties to the reviews (as
identified by either the public or APO service list as appropriate),
and a certificate of service must accompany the document (if you are
not a party to the reviews you do not need to serve your response).
Inability to provide requested information.--Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act in making its
determinations in the reviews.
Information to be Provided in Response to This Notice of
Institution: If you are a domestic producer, union/worker group, or
trade/business association; import/export Subject Merchandise from more
than one Subject Country; or produce Subject Merchandise in more than
one Subject Country, you may file a single response. If you do so,
please ensure that your response to each question includes the
information requested for each pertinent Subject Country. As used
below, the term ``firm'' includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address if available) and name, telephone number, fax number,
and e-mail address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is a U.S.
producer of the Domestic Like Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a
U.S. importer of the Subject Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a U.S. or foreign trade or
business
[[Page 72836]]
association, or another interested party (including an explanation). If
you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, identify
the firms in which your workers are employed or which are members of
your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in these reviews by providing information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping and countervailing duty orders on the Domestic Industry in
general and/or your firm/entity specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19
U.S.C. 1675a(a)) including the likely volume of subject imports, likely
price effects of subject imports, and likely impact of imports of
Subject Merchandise on the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in
each Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 2002.
(7) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during calendar year 2007 (report quantity data in pounds and
value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If you are a union/worker
group or trade/business association, provide the information, on an
aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers are employed/which
are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) The quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(c) The quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s).
(8) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country(ies), provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during calendar year 2007 (report quantity
data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping or countervailing duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise
from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from each Subject Country; and
(c) The quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
and/or countervailing duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise imported from each Subject Country.
(9) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country(ies), provide the following information on your
firm's(s') operations on that product during calendar year 2007 (report
quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and
duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping or
countervailing duties). If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms which are
members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in each Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production; and
(b) The quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from each Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(10) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in each Subject Country after 2002, and significant
changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology;
production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production facilities used for other products
and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production);
and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different
national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets
or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of
substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic
Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise
produced in each Subject Country, and such merchandise from other
countries.
(11) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 25, 2008.
William R. Bishop,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-28409 Filed 11-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P