Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, and 747SR Series Airplanes, 67722-67726 [E8-26480]
Download as PDF
67722
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 222 / Monday, November 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
In-service experience indicates that the
powder coating of the rear right hand (RH)
engine support bracket degrades over time,
leading to a reduced torque of the engine
mountings bolts. In some cases, bolts had
fully unscrewed and fell into the engine
cowling. One case was reported where the
pilot had to shut down an engine in flight
because of a failed V-belt, the cause of failure
assumed to be one of these bolts. This
condition, if not corrected, may lead to
further cases of loose bolts and subsequent
damage to the engine or accessories in the
engine compartment, possibly resulting in inflight engine shut-down and reduced control
of the aircraft.
To address and correct this situation, DAI
has published MSB–42–058, providing
instructions to accomplish repetitive
inspections and correction of the fastening
torque of the affected engine mounting bolts
and replacement of the bolts with wiresecured bolts Part Number (P/N) D60–9071–
26–01, after which the repetitive torque
checks are no longer required.
For the reasons described above, this EASA
AD requires the accomplishment of repetitive
torque checks of the affected engine
mounting bolts and replacement of the bolts
with wire-secured bolts.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) Within the next 100 hours time-inservice (TIS) after December 22, 2008 (the
effective date of this AD) and repetitively
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 hours
TIS, do the inspection and correction of the
fastening torque of the RH rear engine
support bracket mounting bolts following
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. MSB–42–
058, dated May 21, 2008; and Action 1 of
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work
Instruction WI–MSB–42–058, dated March
12, 2008.
(2) Within 6 months after December 22,
2008 (the effective date of this AD), replace
all RH rear engine support bracket mounting
bolts with wire-secured bolts, P/N D60–
9071–26–01, following Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. MSB–42–058, dated May 21, 2008; and
Action 2 of Diamond Aircraft Industries
GmbH Work Instruction WI–MSB–42–058,
dated March 12, 2008.
(3) Installation of the wire-secured bolts, P/
N D60–9071–26–01, as required by paragraph
(f)(2) of this AD, terminates the repetitive
torque inspections required by paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD.
(4) As of 6 months after December 22, 2008
(the effective date of this AD), no person
shall install spare RH rear engine support
bracket mounting bolts as replacement parts
on any aircraft to which this AD applies,
except P/N D60–9071–26–01 wire-secured
bolts.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:35 Nov 14, 2008
Jkt 217001
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Sarjapur Nagarajan, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4145; fax: (816)
329–4090. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2008–0139,
dated July 24, 2008; Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. MSB–42–058, dated May 21, 2008; and
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work
Instruction WI–MSB–42–058, dated March
12, 2008, for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. MSB–42–058, dated May 21, 2008; and
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work
Instruction WI–MSB–42–058, dated March
12, 2008, to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Diamond Aircraft Industries
GmbH, N.A. Otto-Strabe 5, A–2700 Wiener
Neustadt; telephone: +43 2622 26700; fax:
+43 2622 26780; e-mail: office@diamondair.at.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibr-locations.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
October 29, 2008.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–26430 Filed 11–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–0308; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–160–AD; Amendment
39–15731; AD 2008–23–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B
SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F,
747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747–
400F, and 747SR Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 747 airplanes identified
above. This AD requires modifying the
outboard flap track and transmission
attachments. This AD results from a
joint Boeing and FAA multi-model
study (following in-service trailing edge
flap structure and drive system events)
on the hazards posed by skewing and
failed flaps. This study identified the
safety concerns regarding the
transmission attachment design and the
potential loss of an outboard trailing
edge flap. We are issuing this AD to
prevent certain discrepancies associated
with this design (for example, a flap
skew or lateral control asymmetry that
can cause collateral damage to adjacent
hydraulic tubing and subsequent loss of
a hydraulic system), which could result
in the asymmetric flight control limits
being exceeded, and could adversely
affect the airplane’s continued safe
flight and landing.
DATES: This AD is effective December
22, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of December 22, 2008.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 222 / Monday, November 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Tsuji, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–
130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6487; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Boeing Model 747–100, 747–
100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–
200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400,
747–400D, 747–400F, and 747SR series
airplanes. That NPRM was published in
the Federal Register on December 11,
2007 (72 FR 70247). That NPRM
proposed to require modifying the
outboard flap track and transmission
attachments.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
Actions Since NPRM Was Issued
Since we issued the NPRM, Boeing
has issued Service Bulletins 747–
27A2398, Revision 1, dated July 31,
2008; and 747–27A2421, Revision 1,
dated July 10, 2008; to add longer grip
length bolts necessary to install the new
support housing and optional part
numbers for the new support housing.
In the NPRM, we referred to the original
issue of the service bulletins, both dated
April 19, 2007, as the sources of service
information for modifying the outboard
trailing edge flaps. The procedures in
the original issue of the service bulletins
are essentially the same as those in
Revision 1. Therefore, we have revised
paragraph (f) of this AD to refer to
Revision 1 of the service bulletins as the
appropriate sources of service
information for modifying the outboard
trailing edge flaps. We have also revised
paragraphs (c) and (g) of this AD to refer
to Revision 1 of the service bulletins. In
addition, we have added a new
paragraph (h) to the AD to give credit for
using the original issue of the service
bulletins for accomplishing the required
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:35 Nov 14, 2008
Jkt 217001
actions before the effective date of the
AD.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received.
Request To Extend Compliance Period
All Nippon Airways Co. Ltd. (ANA)
and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines—Fleet
Services request that the compliance
period be extended from a tiered 3 years
and 6 years to 5 years and 8 years. The
commenters cite difficulties in
accomplishing the proposed actions
(difficulties related to manpower and
facility requirements) and claim that the
proposed actions are better suited to
correspond to scheduled ‘‘D’’ check
maintenance.
We disagree with the request to
extend the compliance times. We have
determined that the tiered compliance
times of 3 years and 6 years, as
proposed, are commensurate with the
unsafe condition associated with the
loss of the transmission. We have not
changed the final rule regarding this
issue.
Request To Revise Cost Estimate
British Airways (BA) and Boeing state
that the work-hour estimate specified in
the NPRM (150 work hours) is too low.
Boeing reports that its original workhour estimate has been updated based
on further evaluation and the results of
the service bulletin validation. (The
work hours specified in the NPRM are
based on information provided in the
service bulletin.) Boeing’s recalculation
now estimates that the actions will take
310 total hours (258 hours on the
airplane and 52 hours for component
work).
We agree, based on Boeing’s
explanation. We have revised the cost
estimates in this final rule.
Request to Allow Repetitive
Maintenance Instead of Modification
Singapore Airlines Limited states that
the intent of the proposed AD can be
achieved through regular replacement of
the flap transmission bolts (with non H–
11 bolts) and regular nondestructive
testing (NDT) inspections on the Nos. 1,
2, 7, and 8 transmission housings. The
commenter notes that AD 2001–03–10
(amendment 39–12114, 66 FR 10951,
February 21, 2001) mandates replacing
H–11 bolts (which failed prematurely)
with Inconel bolts. Service history has
shown no bolt failures after the bolts
were replaced.
We infer that the commenter is
requesting that we revise the NPRM to
allow repetitive inspections and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67723
replacements instead of the
modification. We do not agree. The
intent of this AD is to remove an
identified single failure condition that
can result in a catastrophic event.
Although AD 2001–03–10 requires
replacing a known source of failures on
the same airplanes affected by this new
AD, and service history has shown no
failures of the existing transmission
attachment fitting, the potential single
failure condition would still exist if no
further action were taken. We have not
changed the final rule regarding this
issue.
Request for Alternative Method
According to Lufthansa, the existing
transmission attachment (solid Inconel
bolts) is a damage-tolerant design, and
the new attachment with a double load
path bolt is a fail-safe design. A cracked
hollow bolt could go undetected, which
Lufthansa claims is a disadvantage
compared to the existing design.
We partially agree with the
commenter’s assertions. We agree that a
cracked hollow bolt could go
undetected. A planned inspection
program must be developed to detect a
fractured hollow bolt before the nested
inner solid bolt fractures. For this
reason, the FAA is considering
additional rulemaking to address this
broader issue. We disagree, however,
that the solid Inconel bolt is a damagetolerant design. Neither the existing
single bolt design nor the new double
load path bolt design would be
classified as damage tolerant without
planned inspections to detect a
fractured bolt. The single bolt design
was identified as a potential safety issue
because a single bolt failure could lead
to overload failure of the two remaining
transmission mounting bolts, which is a
static strength issue. A planned
inspection program of the double load
path bolt design will provide a
transmission mount attachment design
that is damage tolerant. While we might
issue additional rulemaking related to
the broader issue of inspecting to detect
a fractured hollow bolt, we have not
changed this final rule regarding this
issue.
Request To Clarify Relationship of
NPRM to Existing ADs
We cited Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–27A2398, dated April 19,
2007, in the NPRM as an appropriate
source of service information for the
modification. Japan Airlines (JAL) and
ANA request that the actions specified
in that service bulletin be considered an
alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) to paragraphs (a) and (b) of AD
2001–03–10 and paragraph (a) of AD
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
67724
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 222 / Monday, November 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
2001–23–13 (amendment 39–12512, 66
FR 58918, November 26, 2001) (a
correction of that rule was published in
the Federal Register on February 14,
2002 (67 FR 6864)).
The commenters also request that we
describe the relationship among AD
2001–03–10, AD 2001–23–13, and the
NPRM. We provide this summary
information in the table titled
‘‘Breakdown of Actions.’’
BREAKDOWN OF ACTIONS
AD action
Boeing Service Bulletin
Actions
AD 2001–03–10 ..............................
747–27A2376, dated July 1, 1999
AD 2001–23–13 ..............................
747–27–2374, dated November
18, 1999.
747–27A2398, dated April 19,
2007.
Replacing H–11 bolts with Inconel bolts at the trailing edge (TE) flap
transmission attachment fitting.
Replacing the TE flap transmission torque brake and changing the
flap transmission P/N, after a torque brake is replaced.
Replacing the bolts with non-Inconel, dual load path bolts; installing
new flap tracks; and installing the new transmission attachment fitting.
The NPRM ......................................
The commenters state that the NPRM
and Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
27A2398 show part numbers for the No.
2 and No. 7 transmission assemblies
that are different from the part numbers
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
747–27–2374.
We agree that the requirements of this
AD may terminate certain other
requirements. This AD requires
replacing the Inconel attach bolts
installed by AD 2001–03–10 used for
the transmission attachment fitting.
Installation of the new bolts in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin
747–27A2398, dated April 19, 2007, was
previously approved as an AMOC to the
requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of
AD 2001–03–10 by FAA Letter 130S–
08–47a, dated February 21, 2008. We
have revised the AD in newly added
paragraph (i) to clarify the relationship
between the two ADs.
AD 2001–23–13 requires reidentifying the transmission assembly
after replacing a discrepant torque brake
with a new, improved torque brake.
Before doing the requirements of this
AD, operators should have already done
the requirements of AD 2001–23–13, so
the ‘‘new’’ part numbers created by AD
2001–23–13 are the ‘‘existing’’ part
numbers in this AD. The modification
required by this AD creates ‘‘new’’ part
numbers. The ‘‘new’’ part numbers
created by this AD were previously
approved as an AMOC to paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of AD 2001–23–13 by FAA
Letter 130S–08–48a, dated February 5,
2008. This final rule does not terminate
any requirement of AD 2001–23–13.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
Request to Revise Compliance Time for
Paragraph (h)
Paragraph (h) of the NPRM (paragraph
(j) in this final rule) would prohibit
installing unmodified flap transmissions
as of the effective date of the AD. BA,
ANA, KLM, and Boeing request that we
revise this provision to allow the
continued use of unmodified hinge
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:35 Nov 14, 2008
Jkt 217001
braces and support assemblies during
the proposed compliance period for the
modification. As written, paragraph (h)
of the NPRM would require modifying
a flap transmission and associated flap
track whenever a flap transmission or
hinge brace is replaced in service,
regardless of the reason. The
modification requires removing the
outboard flaps and corresponding flap
track, and is intended to be performed
during planned maintenance. The
modification would require significant
manpower and use of proper facilities,
equipment, tooling, etc. The
commenters state that, if a transmission
or hinge brace would need to be
replaced outside of the planned
schedule, such as for miscellaneous
damage or an oil leak, the airplane
would have to be taken out of service for
modification, resulting in significant
economic and operational impact.
We agree with the request and the
commenters’ rationale. The intent of
this AD is to phase out a potential
catastrophic failure mode that currently
exists on Model 747 airplanes; service
history indicates that immediate
modification is not required. We have
revised paragraph (j) of this AD to
correspond with the modification
specified in paragraph (f) of this AD.
Request to Clarify Compliance Times
Boeing requests that we revise the
Relevant Service Information section of
the NPRM, which indicates that the
compliance time is based on flight
cycles on the ‘‘airplane,’’ which, Boeing
asserts, should instead be on the flap
‘‘transmission.’’ Paragraph 1.E. of
Boeing Service Bulletins 747–27A2398
and 747–27A2421 explains that the
compliance time is 6 years for flap
transmissions known to have fewer than
20,000 total flight cycles, and 3 years for
all other transmissions.
We agree with the commenter’s
explanation. We intended that the
compliance times in this AD match the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
compliance times in the service
bulletins. Although the Relevant Service
Information section is not repeated in a
final rule, the compliance time
clarification provided by the commenter
applies to paragraphs (f) and (g) in this
final rule.
Request To Allow Flowchart for
Deriving Compliance Time
Boeing requests that we revise the
NPRM to include matrices (flowcharts)
to help operators determine whether the
6-year or 3-year compliance time
applies to a specific transmission.
Alternatively, the commenter requests
that flowcharts be considered for a
future AMOC. Boeing states that the
FAA agreed that operators may use
transmission age and/or configuration to
select the proper compliance time when
the number of flight cycles on the flap
transmission is unknown. Boeing
reports that its flowcharts mirror the
compliance time recommendations
agreed on by Boeing and the FAA.
We disagree with the request to
include flowcharts in the AD, although
we generally agree that using
transmission age and/or configuration is
acceptable for selecting the proper
compliance time. If the number of
cycles is unknown, operators can
estimate from the flap transmission
configuration the date it was put into
service, and can thus estimate the
number of cycles on the transmission.
But flowcharts can be variously
interpreted and are often subject to
misinterpretation, so they are generally
not enforceable and therefore cannot be
included in ADs. However, according to
the provisions of paragraph (k) of the
final rule, a request may be made to use
a specific flowchart if the derived
compliance times would accurately
reflect the requirements of the AD.
Clarification of NPRM Discussion
In the Discussion section of the
NPRM, we stated that we received a
report about a joint Boeing and FAA
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 222 / Monday, November 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
multi-model study. Although the
Discussion section is not repeated in a
final rule, we provide the following to
clarify events leading up to this AD. In
the late 1990s/early 2000s, the FAA
participated with Boeing in a multimodel investigation on the effects of
trailing edge wing flap skew and flap
loss. As a result of this investigation, a
simulation study revealed potential
67725
failures that could cause a flap skew and
subsequent flap loss, with potentially
catastrophic results.
will not significantly increase the
economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We also determined that these changes
Costs of Compliance
There are about 990 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
The following table provides the
estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Work hours
Average labor
rate per hour
Parts
Cost per
airplane
Number of
U.S.-registered
airplanes
Fleet cost
310 .......................................................................................
$80
$80,023
$104,823
141
$14,780,043
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:35 Nov 14, 2008
Jkt 217001
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2008–23–10 Boeing: Amendment 39–15731.
Docket No. FAA–2007–0308; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–160–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective December 22, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747–
100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B,
747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400,
747–400D, 747–400F, and 747SR series
airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Service Bulletins 747–
27A2398, Revision 1, dated July 31, 2008;
and 747–27A2421, Revision 1, dated July 10,
2008.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a joint Boeing and
FAA multi-model study (following in-service
trailing edge flap structure and drive system
events) on the hazards posed by skewing and
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
failed flaps. This study identified the safety
concerns regarding the transmission
attachment design and the potential loss of
an outboard trailing edge flap. We are issuing
this AD to prevent certain discrepancies
associated with this design (for example, a
flap skew or lateral control asymmetry that
can cause collateral damage to adjacent
hydraulic tubing and subsequent loss of a
hydraulic system), which could result in the
asymmetric flight control limits being
exceeded, and could adversely affect the
airplane’s continued safe flight and landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Modification
(f) Do the following, as applicable: At the
time specified in paragraph 1.E. of Boeing
Service Bulletins 747–27A2398, Revision 1,
dated July 31, 2008; and 747–27A2421,
Revision 1, dated July 10, 2008; except as
provided by paragraph (g) of this AD, modify
the outboard flap track and transmission
attachments by doing all actions specified in
the Accomplishment Instructions of the
service bulletin.
(g) Where Boeing Service Bulletins 747–
27A2398, Revision 1, dated July 31, 2008;
and 747–27A2421, Revision 1, dated July 10,
2008; specify compliance times relative to
the date on the service bulletin, this AD
requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of
this AD.
Credit for Actions Done According to
Previous Issue of Service Bulletins
(h) Actions done before the effective date
of this AD in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletins 747–27A2421 and 747–
27A2398, both dated April 19, 2007, are
acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Terminating Action for Certain
Requirements of AD 2001–03–10
(i) Accomplishment of the modification
specified in paragraph (f) of this AD
terminates the requirements of paragraphs (a)
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
67726
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 222 / Monday, November 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
and (b) of AD 2001–03–10, amendment 39–
12114.
Parts Installation
(j) After completing the modifications
required by paragraph (f) of this AD, no
person may install a part identified in Table
1 of this AD on the modified airplane.
TABLE 1—PARTS PROHIBITED FROM
INSTALLATION
Part
Hinge brace assembly for
Tracks 1 and 8 ..................
Hinge brace assembly for
Tracks 2 and 7 ..................
Support housing assembly
for Tracks 1 and 8 ............
Support housing assembly
for Tracks 2 and 7 ............
Part No.
65B15515–1
65B15515–2
65B15515–9
65B15515–10
65B15525–1
65B15525–2
65B15525–7
65B15525–8
65B17092–1
65B17092–2
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 97
[Docket No. 30636; Amdt. No 3294]
65B81982–( )
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures;
Miscellaneous Amendments
65B81950–( )
AGENCY:
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin
747–27A2398, Revision 1, dated July 31,
2008; or Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
27A2421, Revision 1, dated July 10, 2008; as
applicable; to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–9990; fax 206–766–5682; e-mail
DDCS@boeing.com; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information incorporated by reference at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
17:35 Nov 14, 2008
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
23, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–26480 Filed 11–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
Doug Tsuji, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and
Equipment Branch, ANM–130S; telephone
(425) 917–6487; fax (425) 917–6590; has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Jkt 217001
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This establishes, amends,
suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures
(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are
needed because of the adoption of new
or revised criteria, or because of changes
occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of
new navigational facilities, adding new
obstacles, or changing air traffic
requirements. These changes are
designed to provide safe and efficient
use of the navigable airspace and to
promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected
airports.
This rule is effective November
17, 2008. The compliance date for each
SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums,
and ODP is specified in the amendatory
provisions.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of November
17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Availability of matters
incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
For Examination—
1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA
Headquarters Building, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591;
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. The FAA Regional Office of the
region in which the affected airport is
located;
3. The National Flight Procedures
Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd.,
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or
4. The National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Availability—All SIAPs and Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit https://
www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and
Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA–
200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; or
2. The FAA Regional Office of the
region in which the affected airport is
located.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS–420), Flight
Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500
South MacArthur Blvd. Oklahoma City,
OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box
25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone: (405) 954–4164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
amends Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by
establishing, amending, suspending, or
revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums
and/or ODPS. The complete regulators
description of each SIAP and its
associated Takeoff Minimums or ODP
for an identified airport is listed on FAA
form documents which are incorporated
by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14
CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260–3, 8260–4,
8260–5, 8260–15A, and 8260–15B when
required by an entry on 8260–15A.
The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, in addition to
their complex nature and the need for
a special format make publication in the
Federal Register expensive and
impractical. Furthermore, airmen do not
use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead
refer to their depiction on charts printed
by publishers of aeronautical materials.
The advantages of incorporation by
reference are realized and publication of
the complete description of each SIAP,
E:\FR\FM\17NOR1.SGM
17NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 222 (Monday, November 17, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67722-67726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26480]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2007-0308; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-160-AD;
Amendment 39-15731; AD 2008-23-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-
100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D,
747-400F, and 747SR Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 747 airplanes identified above. This AD requires modifying
the outboard flap track and transmission attachments. This AD results
from a joint Boeing and FAA multi-model study (following in-service
trailing edge flap structure and drive system events) on the hazards
posed by skewing and failed flaps. This study identified the safety
concerns regarding the transmission attachment design and the potential
loss of an outboard trailing edge flap. We are issuing this AD to
prevent certain discrepancies associated with this design (for example,
a flap skew or lateral control asymmetry that can cause collateral
damage to adjacent hydraulic tubing and subsequent loss of a hydraulic
system), which could result in the asymmetric flight control limits
being exceeded, and could adversely affect the airplane's continued
safe flight and landing.
DATES: This AD is effective December 22, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 22,
2008.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
[[Page 67723]]
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Tsuji, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 917-6487; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-
200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, and 747SR series
airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December
11, 2007 (72 FR 70247). That NPRM proposed to require modifying the
outboard flap track and transmission attachments.
Actions Since NPRM Was Issued
Since we issued the NPRM, Boeing has issued Service Bulletins 747-
27A2398, Revision 1, dated July 31, 2008; and 747-27A2421, Revision 1,
dated July 10, 2008; to add longer grip length bolts necessary to
install the new support housing and optional part numbers for the new
support housing. In the NPRM, we referred to the original issue of the
service bulletins, both dated April 19, 2007, as the sources of service
information for modifying the outboard trailing edge flaps. The
procedures in the original issue of the service bulletins are
essentially the same as those in Revision 1. Therefore, we have revised
paragraph (f) of this AD to refer to Revision 1 of the service
bulletins as the appropriate sources of service information for
modifying the outboard trailing edge flaps. We have also revised
paragraphs (c) and (g) of this AD to refer to Revision 1 of the service
bulletins. In addition, we have added a new paragraph (h) to the AD to
give credit for using the original issue of the service bulletins for
accomplishing the required actions before the effective date of the AD.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.
Request To Extend Compliance Period
All Nippon Airways Co. Ltd. (ANA) and KLM Royal Dutch Airlines--
Fleet Services request that the compliance period be extended from a
tiered 3 years and 6 years to 5 years and 8 years. The commenters cite
difficulties in accomplishing the proposed actions (difficulties
related to manpower and facility requirements) and claim that the
proposed actions are better suited to correspond to scheduled ``D''
check maintenance.
We disagree with the request to extend the compliance times. We
have determined that the tiered compliance times of 3 years and 6
years, as proposed, are commensurate with the unsafe condition
associated with the loss of the transmission. We have not changed the
final rule regarding this issue.
Request To Revise Cost Estimate
British Airways (BA) and Boeing state that the work-hour estimate
specified in the NPRM (150 work hours) is too low. Boeing reports that
its original work-hour estimate has been updated based on further
evaluation and the results of the service bulletin validation. (The
work hours specified in the NPRM are based on information provided in
the service bulletin.) Boeing's recalculation now estimates that the
actions will take 310 total hours (258 hours on the airplane and 52
hours for component work).
We agree, based on Boeing's explanation. We have revised the cost
estimates in this final rule.
Request to Allow Repetitive Maintenance Instead of Modification
Singapore Airlines Limited states that the intent of the proposed
AD can be achieved through regular replacement of the flap transmission
bolts (with non H-11 bolts) and regular nondestructive testing (NDT)
inspections on the Nos. 1, 2, 7, and 8 transmission housings. The
commenter notes that AD 2001-03-10 (amendment 39-12114, 66 FR 10951,
February 21, 2001) mandates replacing H-11 bolts (which failed
prematurely) with Inconel bolts. Service history has shown no bolt
failures after the bolts were replaced.
We infer that the commenter is requesting that we revise the NPRM
to allow repetitive inspections and replacements instead of the
modification. We do not agree. The intent of this AD is to remove an
identified single failure condition that can result in a catastrophic
event. Although AD 2001-03-10 requires replacing a known source of
failures on the same airplanes affected by this new AD, and service
history has shown no failures of the existing transmission attachment
fitting, the potential single failure condition would still exist if no
further action were taken. We have not changed the final rule regarding
this issue.
Request for Alternative Method
According to Lufthansa, the existing transmission attachment (solid
Inconel bolts) is a damage-tolerant design, and the new attachment with
a double load path bolt is a fail-safe design. A cracked hollow bolt
could go undetected, which Lufthansa claims is a disadvantage compared
to the existing design.
We partially agree with the commenter's assertions. We agree that a
cracked hollow bolt could go undetected. A planned inspection program
must be developed to detect a fractured hollow bolt before the nested
inner solid bolt fractures. For this reason, the FAA is considering
additional rulemaking to address this broader issue. We disagree,
however, that the solid Inconel bolt is a damage-tolerant design.
Neither the existing single bolt design nor the new double load path
bolt design would be classified as damage tolerant without planned
inspections to detect a fractured bolt. The single bolt design was
identified as a potential safety issue because a single bolt failure
could lead to overload failure of the two remaining transmission
mounting bolts, which is a static strength issue. A planned inspection
program of the double load path bolt design will provide a transmission
mount attachment design that is damage tolerant. While we might issue
additional rulemaking related to the broader issue of inspecting to
detect a fractured hollow bolt, we have not changed this final rule
regarding this issue.
Request To Clarify Relationship of NPRM to Existing ADs
We cited Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-27A2398, dated April 19,
2007, in the NPRM as an appropriate source of service information for
the modification. Japan Airlines (JAL) and ANA request that the actions
specified in that service bulletin be considered an alternative method
of compliance (AMOC) to paragraphs (a) and (b) of AD 2001-03-10 and
paragraph (a) of AD
[[Page 67724]]
2001-23-13 (amendment 39-12512, 66 FR 58918, November 26, 2001) (a
correction of that rule was published in the Federal Register on
February 14, 2002 (67 FR 6864)).
The commenters also request that we describe the relationship among
AD 2001-03-10, AD 2001-23-13, and the NPRM. We provide this summary
information in the table titled ``Breakdown of Actions.''
Breakdown of Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boeing Service
AD action Bulletin Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AD 2001-03-10................. 747-27A2376, Replacing H-11 bolts
dated July 1, with Inconel bolts
1999. at the trailing edge
(TE) flap
transmission
attachment fitting.
AD 2001-23-13................. 747-27-2374, Replacing the TE flap
dated November transmission torque
18, 1999. brake and changing
the flap
transmission P/N,
after a torque brake
is replaced.
The NPRM...................... 747-27A2398, Replacing the bolts
dated April 19, with non-Inconel,
2007. dual load path
bolts; installing
new flap tracks; and
installing the new
transmission
attachment fitting.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The commenters state that the NPRM and Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
27A2398 show part numbers for the No. 2 and No. 7 transmission
assemblies that are different from the part numbers specified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-27-2374.
We agree that the requirements of this AD may terminate certain
other requirements. This AD requires replacing the Inconel attach bolts
installed by AD 2001-03-10 used for the transmission attachment
fitting. Installation of the new bolts in accordance with Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-27A2398, dated April 19, 2007, was previously
approved as an AMOC to the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of AD
2001-03-10 by FAA Letter 130S-08-47a, dated February 21, 2008. We have
revised the AD in newly added paragraph (i) to clarify the relationship
between the two ADs.
AD 2001-23-13 requires re-identifying the transmission assembly
after replacing a discrepant torque brake with a new, improved torque
brake. Before doing the requirements of this AD, operators should have
already done the requirements of AD 2001-23-13, so the ``new'' part
numbers created by AD 2001-23-13 are the ``existing'' part numbers in
this AD. The modification required by this AD creates ``new'' part
numbers. The ``new'' part numbers created by this AD were previously
approved as an AMOC to paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of AD 2001-23-13 by FAA
Letter 130S-08-48a, dated February 5, 2008. This final rule does not
terminate any requirement of AD 2001-23-13.
Request to Revise Compliance Time for Paragraph (h)
Paragraph (h) of the NPRM (paragraph (j) in this final rule) would
prohibit installing unmodified flap transmissions as of the effective
date of the AD. BA, ANA, KLM, and Boeing request that we revise this
provision to allow the continued use of unmodified hinge braces and
support assemblies during the proposed compliance period for the
modification. As written, paragraph (h) of the NPRM would require
modifying a flap transmission and associated flap track whenever a flap
transmission or hinge brace is replaced in service, regardless of the
reason. The modification requires removing the outboard flaps and
corresponding flap track, and is intended to be performed during
planned maintenance. The modification would require significant
manpower and use of proper facilities, equipment, tooling, etc. The
commenters state that, if a transmission or hinge brace would need to
be replaced outside of the planned schedule, such as for miscellaneous
damage or an oil leak, the airplane would have to be taken out of
service for modification, resulting in significant economic and
operational impact.
We agree with the request and the commenters' rationale. The intent
of this AD is to phase out a potential catastrophic failure mode that
currently exists on Model 747 airplanes; service history indicates that
immediate modification is not required. We have revised paragraph (j)
of this AD to correspond with the modification specified in paragraph
(f) of this AD.
Request to Clarify Compliance Times
Boeing requests that we revise the Relevant Service Information
section of the NPRM, which indicates that the compliance time is based
on flight cycles on the ``airplane,'' which, Boeing asserts, should
instead be on the flap ``transmission.'' Paragraph 1.E. of Boeing
Service Bulletins 747-27A2398 and 747-27A2421 explains that the
compliance time is 6 years for flap transmissions known to have fewer
than 20,000 total flight cycles, and 3 years for all other
transmissions.
We agree with the commenter's explanation. We intended that the
compliance times in this AD match the compliance times in the service
bulletins. Although the Relevant Service Information section is not
repeated in a final rule, the compliance time clarification provided by
the commenter applies to paragraphs (f) and (g) in this final rule.
Request To Allow Flowchart for Deriving Compliance Time
Boeing requests that we revise the NPRM to include matrices
(flowcharts) to help operators determine whether the 6-year or 3-year
compliance time applies to a specific transmission. Alternatively, the
commenter requests that flowcharts be considered for a future AMOC.
Boeing states that the FAA agreed that operators may use transmission
age and/or configuration to select the proper compliance time when the
number of flight cycles on the flap transmission is unknown. Boeing
reports that its flowcharts mirror the compliance time recommendations
agreed on by Boeing and the FAA.
We disagree with the request to include flowcharts in the AD,
although we generally agree that using transmission age and/or
configuration is acceptable for selecting the proper compliance time.
If the number of cycles is unknown, operators can estimate from the
flap transmission configuration the date it was put into service, and
can thus estimate the number of cycles on the transmission. But
flowcharts can be variously interpreted and are often subject to
misinterpretation, so they are generally not enforceable and therefore
cannot be included in ADs. However, according to the provisions of
paragraph (k) of the final rule, a request may be made to use a
specific flowchart if the derived compliance times would accurately
reflect the requirements of the AD.
Clarification of NPRM Discussion
In the Discussion section of the NPRM, we stated that we received a
report about a joint Boeing and FAA
[[Page 67725]]
multi-model study. Although the Discussion section is not repeated in a
final rule, we provide the following to clarify events leading up to
this AD. In the late 1990s/early 2000s, the FAA participated with
Boeing in a multi-model investigation on the effects of trailing edge
wing flap skew and flap loss. As a result of this investigation, a
simulation study revealed potential failures that could cause a flap
skew and subsequent flap loss, with potentially catastrophic results.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that
these changes will not significantly increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 990 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this AD.
Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of U.S.-
Work hours Average labor Parts Cost per registered Fleet cost
rate per hour airplane airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
310................................................................ $80 $80,023 $104,823 141 $14,780,043
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-23-10 Boeing: Amendment 39-15731. Docket No. FAA-2007-0308;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-160-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective December 22,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B
SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-
400F, and 747SR series airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Service Bulletins 747-27A2398, Revision 1,
dated July 31, 2008; and 747-27A2421, Revision 1, dated July 10,
2008.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a joint Boeing and FAA multi-model
study (following in-service trailing edge flap structure and drive
system events) on the hazards posed by skewing and failed flaps.
This study identified the safety concerns regarding the transmission
attachment design and the potential loss of an outboard trailing
edge flap. We are issuing this AD to prevent certain discrepancies
associated with this design (for example, a flap skew or lateral
control asymmetry that can cause collateral damage to adjacent
hydraulic tubing and subsequent loss of a hydraulic system), which
could result in the asymmetric flight control limits being exceeded,
and could adversely affect the airplane's continued safe flight and
landing.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Modification
(f) Do the following, as applicable: At the time specified in
paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Service Bulletins 747-27A2398, Revision 1,
dated July 31, 2008; and 747-27A2421, Revision 1, dated July 10,
2008; except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD, modify the
outboard flap track and transmission attachments by doing all
actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin.
(g) Where Boeing Service Bulletins 747-27A2398, Revision 1,
dated July 31, 2008; and 747-27A2421, Revision 1, dated July 10,
2008; specify compliance times relative to the date on the service
bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
Credit for Actions Done According to Previous Issue of Service
Bulletins
(h) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletins 747-27A2421 and 747-
27A2398, both dated April 19, 2007, are acceptable for compliance
with the requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Terminating Action for Certain Requirements of AD 2001-03-10
(i) Accomplishment of the modification specified in paragraph
(f) of this AD terminates the requirements of paragraphs (a)
[[Page 67726]]
and (b) of AD 2001-03-10, amendment 39-12114.
Parts Installation
(j) After completing the modifications required by paragraph (f)
of this AD, no person may install a part identified in Table 1 of
this AD on the modified airplane.
Table 1--Parts Prohibited From Installation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part Part No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hinge brace assembly for Tracks 1 and 8................. 65B15515-1
65B15515-2
65B15515-9
65B15515-10
Hinge brace assembly for Tracks 2 and 7................. 65B15525-1
65B15525-2
65B15525-7
65B15525-8
65B17092-1
65B17092-2
Support housing assembly for Tracks 1 and 8............. 65B81982-( )
Support housing assembly for Tracks 2 and 7............. 65B81950-( )
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(k)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, ATTN: Doug Tsuji, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment
Branch, ANM-130S; telephone (425) 917-6487; fax (425) 917-6590; has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(l) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin 747-27A2398, Revision
1, dated July 31, 2008; or Boeing Service Bulletin 747-27A2421,
Revision 1, dated July 10, 2008; as applicable; to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207; telephone 206-544-9990; fax 206-766-5682; e-mail
DDCS@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 23, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-26480 Filed 11-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P