Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review, 65832 [E8-26411]
Download as PDF
65832
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 5, 2008 / Notices
Scope of the Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–808]
Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India:
Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Antidumping Duty
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) has determined,
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), that
India Steel Works Limited (India Steel)
is the successor-in-interest to Isibars
Limited (Isibars). As a result, India Steel
will be accorded the same treatment
previously accorded to Isibars with
regard to the antidumping duty order on
stainless steel wire rods from India as of
the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: November 5,
2008.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edythe Artman and Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–3931 and (202)
482–1690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Background
On December 1, 1993, the Department
published an antidumping duty order
on wire rods from India. See
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India, 58
FR 63335 (December 1, 1993). On
August 4, 2008, the Department
received a request for a changedcircumstances review of this order from
India Steel to determine if, for purposes
of the antidumping law, India Steel is
the successor-in-interest to Isibars.
On September 25, 2008, the
Department published the notice of
initiation for this changedcircumstances review and preliminarily
found that India Steel is the successorin-interest to Isibars and should be
treated as such for antidumping duty
cash-deposit purposes. See Notice of
Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Changed Circumstances Antidumping
Duty Review: Stainless Steel Wire Rods
from India, 73 FR 55498 (September 25,
2008). We invited parties to comment
on the preliminary results but received
no comments or requests for a hearing.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:24 Nov 04, 2008
Jkt 217001
The merchandise under review is
wire rods, which are hot-rolled or hotrolled annealed and/or pickled rounds,
squares, octagons, hexagons or other
shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of
alloy steels containing, by weight, 1.2
percent or less of carbon and 10.5
percent or more of chromium, with or
without other elements. These products
are only manufactured by hot-rolling
and are normally sold in coiled form,
and are of solid cross section. The
majority of wire rods sold in the United
States are round in cross-section shape,
annealed, and pickled. The most
common size is 5.5 millimeters in
diameter.
The wire rods subject to this order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015,
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and
7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to the order is
dispositive of whether the merchandise
is covered by the order.
Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review
For the reasons stated in the
preliminary results and because the
Department did not receive any
comments on the preliminary results of
this review, the Department continues
to find that India Steel is the successorin-interest to Isibars for antidumping
duty cash-deposit purposes.
Instructions to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
suspend liquidation of all shipments of
the subject merchandise produced and
exported by India Steel entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of this notice at 30.10 percent (i.e.,
Isibars’s cash-deposit rate, as published
in Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India:
Amended Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR
47177 (August 12, 2005)). This deposit
rate shall remain in effect until
publication of the final results of the
next administrative review in which
India Steel participates.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APOs) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice in accordance with
sections 751(b) and 777(i)(1) of the Act,
and sections 351.216(e) and
351.221(c)(3)(i) of the Department’s
regulations.
Dated: October 30, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–26411 Filed 11–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–848]
Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of the Expedited Second
Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 1, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated the second sunset
review of the antidumping duty order
on freshwater crawfish tail meat from
the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The
Department conducted an expedited
(120–day) sunset review of this order.
As a result of this sunset review, the
Department finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty order would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 5, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyn
Johnson or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0665 and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
AGENCY:
Background
On July 1, 2008, the Department
initiated the second sunset review of the
antidumping duty order on freshwater
crawfish tail meat from the PRC. See
Initiation of Five–year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Review, 73 FR 37411 (July 1, 2008). The
Department received a Notice of Intent
to Participate from a domestic interested
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 65832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26411]
[[Page 65832]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-808]
Stainless Steel Wire Rods From India: Final Results of Changed-
Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) has determined,
pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), that India Steel Works Limited (India Steel) is the successor-in-
interest to Isibars Limited (Isibars). As a result, India Steel will be
accorded the same treatment previously accorded to Isibars with regard
to the antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rods from India
as of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: November 5, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edythe Artman and Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
3931 and (202) 482-1690.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 1, 1993, the Department published an antidumping duty
order on wire rods from India. See Antidumping Duty Order: Certain
Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India, 58 FR 63335 (December 1, 1993).
On August 4, 2008, the Department received a request for a changed-
circumstances review of this order from India Steel to determine if,
for purposes of the antidumping law, India Steel is the successor-in-
interest to Isibars.
On September 25, 2008, the Department published the notice of
initiation for this changed-circumstances review and preliminarily
found that India Steel is the successor-in-interest to Isibars and
should be treated as such for antidumping duty cash-deposit purposes.
See Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping Duty Review: Stainless Steel Wire Rods from
India, 73 FR 55498 (September 25, 2008). We invited parties to comment
on the preliminary results but received no comments or requests for a
hearing.
Scope of the Review
The merchandise under review is wire rods, which are hot-rolled or
hot-rolled annealed and/or pickled rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons
or other shapes, in coils. Wire rods are made of alloy steels
containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon and 10.5 percent
or more of chromium, with or without other elements. These products are
only manufactured by hot-rolling and are normally sold in coiled form,
and are of solid cross section. The majority of wire rods sold in the
United States are round in cross-section shape, annealed, and pickled.
The most common size is 5.5 millimeters in diameter.
The wire rods subject to this order are currently classifiable
under subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030,
7221.00.0045, and 7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to the order is dispositive of whether the
merchandise is covered by the order.
Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review
For the reasons stated in the preliminary results and because the
Department did not receive any comments on the preliminary results of
this review, the Department continues to find that India Steel is the
successor-in-interest to Isibars for antidumping duty cash-deposit
purposes.
Instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to suspend liquidation of all shipments of the subject
merchandise produced and exported by India Steel entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of
this notice at 30.10 percent (i.e., Isibars's cash-deposit rate, as
published in Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Amended Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 47177 (August 12,
2005)). This deposit rate shall remain in effect until publication of
the final results of the next administrative review in which India
Steel participates.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written notification of
the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice in accordance with sections 751(b) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act, and sections 351.216(e) and 351.221(c)(3)(i) of the Department's
regulations.
Dated: October 30, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-26411 Filed 11-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P