Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 62477-62479 [E8-24903]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
Postponement of Final Determination
Pursuant to section 735(a)(2) of the
Act, on September 23, 2008, Wujin
Water requested that, in the event of an
affirmative preliminary determination
in this investigation, the Department
postpone its final determination by 60
days.15 At the same time, Wujin Water
agreed that the Department may extend
the application of the provisional
measures prescribed under 19 CFR
351.210(e)(2) from a 4-month period to
a 6-month period. In accordance with
section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b), we are granting the request
and are postponing the final
determination until no later than 135
days after the publication of this notice
in the Federal Register because: (1) Our
preliminary determination is
affirmative, (2) the requesting exporter
accounts for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise, and
(3) no compelling reasons for denial
exist. Suspension of liquidation will be
extended accordingly.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 15, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–25032 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–580–836
Certain Cut–to–Length Carbon–Quality
Steel Plate Products from the Republic
of Korea: Extension of Time Limit for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyn
Johnson or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5287 or (202) 482–
1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
15 On October 6, 2008, Petitioner requested that
in the event that the Department issues a negative
preliminary determination in this investigation, it
postpone the final determination until not later
than 135 days after the publication of the
preliminary determination in the Federal Register.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
Background
At the request of interested parties,
the Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain cut–to-length carbon–quality
steel plate products from the Republic
of Korea for the period February 1, 2007,
through January 31, 2008. See Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews, Request
for Revocation in Part, and Deferral of
Administrative Review, 73 FR 16837
(March 31, 2008). The preliminary
results of this administrative review are
currently due no later than October 31,
2008.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to make a preliminary
determination within 245 days after the
last day of the anniversary month of an
order for which a review is requested
and a final determination within 120
days after the date on which the
preliminary determination is published.
If it is not practicable to complete the
review within these time periods,
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows
the Department to extend the time limit
for the preliminary results to a
maximum of 365 days after the last day
of the anniversary month. See also 19
CFR 351.213(h).
We determine that it is not practicable
to complete the preliminary results of
this review by the current deadline of
October 31, 2008, for several reasons.
Specifically, the Department has granted
the respondent, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co.,
Ltd. (DSM), several extensions to
respond to the original and
supplemental questionnaires.1 Thus, the
Department requires additional time to
review and analyze the sales and cost
responses submitted by DSM. Further,
the Department requires additional time
to review issues such as corporate
affiliations and to analyze the changes
in DSM’s product–coding system as it
will affect the Department’s matching
methodology in this case. Therefore, we
are extending the time period for issuing
the preliminary results of this review by
45 days until December 15, 2008.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2).
1 See, e.g., letter to Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd.,
from Laurie Parkhill, dated August 28, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62477
Dated: October 14, 2008.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration
[FR Doc. E8–25033 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–833]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From
Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 17, 2008, the
Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain polyester staple fiber from
Taiwan. The period of review is May 1,
2006, through April 30, 2007. We gave
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the preliminary results.
Based on our analysis of the comments
received and an examination of our
calculations, we have made certain
changes for the final results. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for
Far Eastern Textile Limited is listed
below in the ‘‘Final Results of the
Review’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: October 21, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Schauer or Richard Rimlinger,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0410 and (202)
482–4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On April 17, 2008, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published
in the Federal Register the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
polyester staple fiber (PSF) from Taiwan
for the period May 1, 2006. through
April 30, 2007. See Certain Polyester
Staple Fiber from Taiwan: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 73 FR 20907
(April 17, 2008).
On June 2, 2008, we extended the
deadline for the final results of review.
See Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan:
Extension of Time Limit for the Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
62478
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
Administrative Review, 73 FR 31433
(June 2, 2008).
We conducted a verification of Far
Eastern Textile Limited’s (FET) homemarket and U.S. sales from June 16
through 19, 2008, and we issued a
verification report on July 11, 2008. We
invited interested parties to comment on
the preliminary results and our
verification findings.
We received case and rebuttal briefs
from Weliman, Inc., and Invista, S,a.r.1.
(collectively, the petitioners), and FET.
The period of review (POR) is May 1,
2006, through April 30, 2007. We have
conducted this review in accordance
with section 75 1(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
certain polyester staple fiber (PSF). PSF
is defined as synthetic staple fibers, not
carded, combed or otherwise processed
for spinning, of polyesters measuring
3.3 decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or more
in diameter. This merchandise is cut to
lengths varying from one inch (25 mm)
to five inches (127 mm). The
merchandise subject to the order may be
coated, usually with a silicon or other
finish, or not coated. PSF is generally
used as stuffing in sleeping bags,
mattresses, ski jackets, comforters,
cushions, pillows, and furniture.
Merchandise of less than 3.3 decitex
(less than 3 denier) currently classifiable
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) at
subheading 5503.20.00.251 is
specifically excluded from the order.
Also specifically excluded from the
order are polyester staple fibers of 10 to
18 denier that are cut to lengths of 6 to
8 inches (fibers used in the manufacture
of carpeting). In addition, low-melt PSF
is excluded from the order. Low-melt
PSF is defined as a bi-component fiber
with an outer sheath that melts at a
significantly lower temperature than its
inner core.
The merchandise subject to the order
is currently classifiable in the HTSUS at
subheadings 5503.20.00.45 and
5503.20.00.65. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to the order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this review
are addressed in the October 14, 2008,
1 The most current edition of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (2006)—
Supplement I (Rev 1) (August 1, 2006) incorporates
the revision of HTSUS number 5503.20.00.20 to
5503.20.00.25.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Certain Polyester Staple Fiber
from Taiwan’’ (Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
Attached to this notice as an appendix
is a list of the issues which parties have
raised and to which we have responded
in the Decision Memorandum. Parties
can find a complete discussion of all
issues raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
the Department’s Central Records Unit,
Room 1117 of the main Department
building (CRU). In addition, a complete
version of the Decision Memorandum
can be accessed directly on the Web.
The paper copy and electronic version
of the Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Results of the COP Test
Pursuant to section 773(b)(2)(C)(i) of
the Act, where less than 20 percent of
sales of a given product were at prices
less than the cost of production (COP),
we did not disregard any below-cost
sales of that product because we
determined that the below-cost sales
were not made in ‘‘substantial
quantities.’’ Where 20 percent or more
of a respondent’s sales of a given
product during the POR were at prices
less than the COP, we determined such
sales to have been made in ‘‘substantial
quantities.’’ See section 773(b)(2)(C) of
the Act. The sales were made within an
extended period of time in accordance
with section 773(b)(2)(B) of the Act
because we examined below-cost sales
occurring during the entire POR. In such
cases, because we compared prices to
POR-average costs, we also determined
that such sales were not made at prices
which would permit recovery of all
costs within a reasonable period of time,
in accordance with section 773(b)(2)(D)
of the Act.
We found that, for certain products,
more than 20 percent of the
respondent’s home-market sales were at
prices less than the COP and, thus, the
below-cost sales were made within an
extended period of time and in
substantial quantities. See section
773(b)(2)(C)(i) of the Act. In addition,
these sales were made at prices that did
not permit the recovery of costs within
a reasonable period of time. See section
773(b)(2)(D) of the Act. Therefore, we
excluded these sales and used the
remaining sales, if any, as the basis for
determining normal value, in
accordance with section 773(h)(1) of the
Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Final Results of the Review
We find that a dumping margin of
1.72 percent exists for FET for the
period May 1, 2006, through April 30,
2007.
Assessment of Duties
The Department shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries. Although FET
indicated that it was not the importer of
record for any of its sales to the United
States during the POR, it reported the
name of the importers of record for all
of its U.S. sales. Because FET reported
the entered value for all of its U.S. sales,
we have calculated importer-specific
assessment rates for the merchandise in
question by aggregating the dumping
margins we calculated for all U.S. sales
to each importer and dividing this
amount by the total entered value of
those sales.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
This clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by the respondent for which
it did not know its merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR23954 (May 6, 2003). The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
directly to CBP 15 days after publication
of these final results of review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
are effective for all shipments of PSF
from Taiwan entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the publication date of these final
results, as provided by section 751(a)(1)
of the Act: (1) The cash-deposit rate for
FET will be 1.72 percent; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this review
but covered in the original less-thanfair-value investigation or previous
reviews, the cash-deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the
original investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this review, the cash-deposit
rate will be 7.31 percent, the all-others
rate established in Notice of Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Polyester
Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea
and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain
Polyester Staple Fiber From the
Republic of Korea and Taiwan, 65
FR33807 (May 25, 2000). These cashdeposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and this notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: October 14, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
APPENDIX I
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
List of Comments in the Decision
Memorandum
Comment 1: Date of Sale
Comment 2: Classification of Sales
Comment 3: Grade Designations
Comment 4: Home-Market Credit
Expenses
Comment 5: Verification Findings
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Comment 6: U.S. Actual Credit
Expenses
December 2007. See 19 CFR
351.204(b)(1).
[FR Doc. E8–24903 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
Scope of Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is uncovered innerspring
units composed of a series of individual
metal springs joined together in sizes
corresponding to the sizes of adult
mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full,
full long, queen, California king, and
king) and units used in smaller
constructions, such as crib and youth
mattresses. All uncovered innerspring
units are included in this scope
regardless of width and length. Included
within this definition are innersprings
typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76
inches in width and 68 inches to 84
inches in length. Innersprings for crib
mattresses typically range from 25
inches to 27 inches in width and 50
inches to 52 inches in length.
Uncovered innerspring units are
suitable for use as the innerspring
component in the manufacture of
innerspring mattresses, including
mattresses that incorporate a foam
encasement around the innerspring.
Pocketed and non–pocketed
innerspring units are included in this
definition. Non–pocketed innersprings
are typically joined together with helical
wire and border rods. Non–pocketed
innersprings are included in this
definition regardless of whether they
have border rods attached to the
perimeter of the innerspring. Pocketed
innersprings are individual coils
covered by a ‘‘pocket’’ or ‘‘sock’’ of a
nonwoven synthetic material or woven
material and then glued together in a
linear fashion.
Uncovered innersprings are classified
under subheading 9404.29.9010 and
have also been classified under
subheadings 9404.10.0000,
7326.20.00.70, 7320.20.5010, or
7320.90.5010 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
The HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes
only; the written description of the
scope of this proceeding is dispositive.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–552–803
Uncovered Innerspring Units from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice
of Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 21, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) determines that
imports of uncovered innerspring units
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
(‘‘Vietnam’’) are being, or are likely to
be, sold in the United States at less than
fair value, as provided in section 735 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’). The final weighted–average
dumping margins are listed below in the
section entitled ‘‘Final Determination of
Investigation.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eugene Degnan or Robert Bolling, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0414 or (202) 482–
3434, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Jkt 217001
62479
Background
On August 6, 2008, the Department
published the preliminary
determination of sales at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’) in the antidumping
investigation of uncovered innerspring
units from Vietnam. See Uncovered
Innerspring Units from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Notice of
Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 45738
(August 6, 2008) (‘‘Preliminary
Determination’’). We invited parties to
comment on the Preliminary
Determination. We did not receive any
case or rebuttal briefs from any
interested parties.
Period of Investigation
The POI is April 1, 2007, through
September 30, 2007. This period
corresponds to the two most recent
fiscal quarters prior to the month of the
filing of the petition, which was
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Scope–Clarification Request
Caye Home Furnishings LLC (Caye
Furnishings), a U.S. manufacturer of
living room furniture, requested that we
clarify the scope language of the
antidumping duty investigations on
uncovered innerspring units from the
People’s Republic of China, South
Africa, and the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam. See August 25, 2008, letter
from Caye Furnishings. Specifically,
Caye Furnishings requested that we
modify the scope of the investigations to
exclude springs and individually
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62477-62479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24903]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-833]
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 17, 2008, the Department of Commerce published the
preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on certain polyester staple fiber from Taiwan. The period of
review is May 1, 2006, through April 30, 2007. We gave interested
parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. Based on
our analysis of the comments received and an examination of our
calculations, we have made certain changes for the final results. The
final weighted-average dumping margin for Far Eastern Textile Limited
is listed below in the ``Final Results of the Review'' section of this
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: October 21, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Schauer or Richard Rimlinger,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0410 and (202) 482-4477, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 17, 2008, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain
polyester staple fiber (PSF) from Taiwan for the period May 1, 2006.
through April 30, 2007. See Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR
20907 (April 17, 2008).
On June 2, 2008, we extended the deadline for the final results of
review. See Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit
for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
[[Page 62478]]
Administrative Review, 73 FR 31433 (June 2, 2008).
We conducted a verification of Far Eastern Textile Limited's (FET)
home-market and U.S. sales from June 16 through 19, 2008, and we issued
a verification report on July 11, 2008. We invited interested parties
to comment on the preliminary results and our verification findings.
We received case and rebuttal briefs from Weliman, Inc., and
Invista, S,a.r.1. (collectively, the petitioners), and FET. The period
of review (POR) is May 1, 2006, through April 30, 2007. We have
conducted this review in accordance with section 75 1(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is certain polyester staple fiber
(PSF). PSF is defined as synthetic staple fibers, not carded, combed or
otherwise processed for spinning, of polyesters measuring 3.3 decitex
(3 denier, inclusive) or more in diameter. This merchandise is cut to
lengths varying from one inch (25 mm) to five inches (127 mm). The
merchandise subject to the order may be coated, usually with a silicon
or other finish, or not coated. PSF is generally used as stuffing in
sleeping bags, mattresses, ski jackets, comforters, cushions, pillows,
and furniture. Merchandise of less than 3.3 decitex (less than 3
denier) currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) at subheading 5503.20.00.25\1\ is
specifically excluded from the order. Also specifically excluded from
the order are polyester staple fibers of 10 to 18 denier that are cut
to lengths of 6 to 8 inches (fibers used in the manufacture of
carpeting). In addition, low-melt PSF is excluded from the order. Low-
melt PSF is defined as a bi-component fiber with an outer sheath that
melts at a significantly lower temperature than its inner core.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The most current edition of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (2006)--Supplement I (Rev 1) (August 1, 2006)
incorporates the revision of HTSUS number 5503.20.00.20 to
5503.20.00.25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise subject to the order is currently classifiable in
the HTSUS at subheadings 5503.20.00.45 and 5503.20.00.65. Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this review are addressed in the October 14, 2008, ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from Taiwan'' (Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this notice. Attached to this notice as an
appendix is a list of the issues which parties have raised and to which
we have responded in the Decision Memorandum. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on
file in the Department's Central Records Unit, Room 1117 of the main
Department building (CRU). In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Web. The paper copy
and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Results of the COP Test
Pursuant to section 773(b)(2)(C)(i) of the Act, where less than 20
percent of sales of a given product were at prices less than the cost
of production (COP), we did not disregard any below-cost sales of that
product because we determined that the below-cost sales were not made
in ``substantial quantities.'' Where 20 percent or more of a
respondent's sales of a given product during the POR were at prices
less than the COP, we determined such sales to have been made in
``substantial quantities.'' See section 773(b)(2)(C) of the Act. The
sales were made within an extended period of time in accordance with
section 773(b)(2)(B) of the Act because we examined below-cost sales
occurring during the entire POR. In such cases, because we compared
prices to POR-average costs, we also determined that such sales were
not made at prices which would permit recovery of all costs within a
reasonable period of time, in accordance with section 773(b)(2)(D) of
the Act.
We found that, for certain products, more than 20 percent of the
respondent's home-market sales were at prices less than the COP and,
thus, the below-cost sales were made within an extended period of time
and in substantial quantities. See section 773(b)(2)(C)(i) of the Act.
In addition, these sales were made at prices that did not permit the
recovery of costs within a reasonable period of time. See section
773(b)(2)(D) of the Act. Therefore, we excluded these sales and used
the remaining sales, if any, as the basis for determining normal value,
in accordance with section 773(h)(1) of the Act.
Final Results of the Review
We find that a dumping margin of 1.72 percent exists for FET for
the period May 1, 2006, through April 30, 2007.
Assessment of Duties
The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. Although FET indicated that it was not the importer of record
for any of its sales to the United States during the POR, it reported
the name of the importers of record for all of its U.S. sales. Because
FET reported the entered value for all of its U.S. sales, we have
calculated importer-specific assessment rates for the merchandise in
question by aggregating the dumping margins we calculated for all U.S.
sales to each importer and dividing this amount by the total entered
value of those sales.
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This clarification will apply to
entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by the
respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for
the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full
discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Proceedings Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR23954 (May 6,
2003). The Department intends to issue assessment instructions directly
to CBP 15 days after publication of these final results of review.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements are effective for all shipments
of PSF from Taiwan entered or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption
on or after the publication date of these final results, as provided by
section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash-deposit rate for FET will be
1.72 percent; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or
exporters not covered in this review but covered in the original less-
than-fair-value investigation or previous reviews, the cash-deposit
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate
[[Page 62479]]
will be the rate established for the most recent period for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor
the manufacturer is a firm covered in this review, the cash-deposit
rate will be 7.31 percent, the all-others rate established in Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain
Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea and Antidumping Duty
Orders: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber From the Republic of Korea and
Taiwan, 65 FR33807 (May 25, 2000). These cash-deposit requirements
shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: October 14, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
APPENDIX I
List of Comments in the Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Date of Sale
Comment 2: Classification of Sales
Comment 3: Grade Designations
Comment 4: Home-Market Credit Expenses
Comment 5: Verification Findings
Comment 6: U.S. Actual Credit Expenses
[FR Doc. E8-24903 Filed 10-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M