Ball Bearings From Japan and the United Kingdom, 62317-62318 [E8-24890]

Download as PDF mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 203 / Monday, October 20, 2008 / Notices retained by the person, of the authority which the information is sought and whether disclosure is mandatory or voluntary; of the principal purposes for which the information is intended to be used; of the routine uses which may be made of the information; and the effects on the person, if any, of not providing all or any part of the requested information. The application of this provision could provide the subject of an investigation with substantial information about the nature of that investigation, which could interfere with the investigation. Moreover, providing such information to the subject of an investigation could seriously impede or compromise an undercover investigation by revealing its existence and could endanger the physical safety of confidential sources, witnesses, and investigators by revealing their identities. (6) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). The application of this section could disclose investigative techniques and procedures and cause sources to refrain from giving such information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of promise(s) of anonymity and confidentiality. This could compromise Reclamation’s ability to conduct investigations and to identify, detect and apprehend violators. (7) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(5). This section requires an agency to maintain its records with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual in making any determination about the individual. In collecting information for criminal law enforcement purposes, it is not possible to determine in advance what information is accurate, relevant, timely, and complete. Material that may seem unrelated, irrelevant, or incomplete when collected may take on added meaning or significance as the investigation progresses. The restrictions of this provision could interfere with the preparation of a complete investigative report, thereby impeding effective law enforcement. (8) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(8). This section requires an agency to make reasonable efforts to serve notice on an individual when any record on the individual is made available to any person under compulsory legal process when that process becomes a matter of public record. Complying with this provision could prematurely reveal an ongoing criminal investigation to the subject of the investigation. [FR Doc. E8–24836 Filed 10–17–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:42 Oct 17, 2008 Jkt 217001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–394–A & 399– A (Second Review) (Remand)] Ball Bearings From Japan and the United Kingdom United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby gives notice of the court-ordered remand of its affirmative determinations in the five-year reviews of the antidumping orders on ball bearings from Japan and the United Kingdom. For further information concerning the conduct of this proceeding and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell Duncan, Office of Investigations, telephone 202–708–4727, or David Goldfine, Office of General Counsel, telephone 202–708–5452, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record of investigation Nos. 731–TA–340 E & H may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (‘‘EDIS’’) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—In June 2006, the Commission determined that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission’s determinations for Japan and the United Kingdom were appealed to the Court of International Trade. On September 9, 2008, the Court issued a decision remanding the matter to the Commission for further proceedings. NSK v. United States, Slip Op. 08–95 (Ct. Int’l Trade, Sept. 9, 2008). In its PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62317 opinion, the Court issued an order instructing the Commission to (1) ‘‘conduct a Bratsk analysis of nonsubject imports as outlined in this opinion;’’(2) ‘‘reassess supply conditions within the domestic industry,’’ i.e., the industry’s restructuring efforts during the period of review, and (3) ‘‘reexamine its findings with regard to likely impact and its decision to cumulate imports from the United Kingdom in light of changes in its determinations that may result as a consequence of the foregoing remand instructions.’’ Participation in the proceeding.— Only those persons who were interested parties to the reviews (i.e., persons listed on the Commission Secretary’s service list) and parties to the appeal may participate in the remand proceeding. Such persons need not make any additional filings with the Commission to participate in the remand proceeding. Business proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) referred to during the remand proceeding will be governed, as appropriate, by the administrative protective order issued in the reviews. Written submissions.—The Commission is re-opening the record in this proceeding to obtain information to conduct a Bratsk analysis of non-subject imports as outlined in the Court’s opinion. The Commission will permit the parties to file comments pertaining to the specific issues that are the subject of the Court’s remand instructions and, in this regard, may comment on the new information obtained on remand. Comments should be limited to no more than fifteen (15) double-spaced and single-sided pages of textual material. The parties may not themselves submit any new factual information in their comments and may not address any issue other than those that are the subject of the Court’s remand instructions. Any such comments must be filed with the Commission no later than November 28, 2008. All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (Nov. 8, 2002). In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigation must be served on all other E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM 20OCN1 62318 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 203 / Monday, October 20, 2008 / Notices parties to the investigation (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Parties are also advised to consult with the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for provisions of general applicability concerning written submissions to the Commission. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 14, 2008 Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–24890 Filed 10–17–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1012 (Review)] Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From Vietnam United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. AGENCY: assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 6, 2008, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution (73 FR 37487, July 1, 2008) were adequate. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 14, 2008. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E8–24894 Filed 10–17–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen fish fillets from Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: October 6, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:42 Oct 17, 2008 Jkt 217001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–752 (Second Review)] Crawfish Tail Meat From China United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping duty order on crawfish tail meat from China. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on crawfish tail meat from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: October 6, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Olympia DeRosa Hand (202–205–3182), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On October 6, 2008, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (73 FR 37489, July 1, 2008) of the subject five-year review was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on October 30, 2008, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the review and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to the review, may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. 2 The Commission has found the responses submitted by the Crawfish Processors Alliance to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM 20OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 203 (Monday, October 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62317-62318]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24890]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-394-A & 399-A (Second Review) (Remand)]


Ball Bearings From Japan and the United Kingdom

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade Commission (``Commission'') 
hereby gives notice of the court-ordered remand of its affirmative 
determinations in the five-year reviews of the antidumping orders on 
ball bearings from Japan and the United Kingdom. For further 
information concerning the conduct of this proceeding and rules of 
general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 
207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207).

DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell Duncan, Office of 
Investigations, telephone 202-708-4727, or David Goldfine, Office of 
General Counsel, telephone 202-708-5452, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired 
persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record 
of investigation Nos. 731-TA-340 E & H may be viewed on the 
Commission's electronic docket (``EDIS'') at https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background.--In June 2006, the Commission determined that 
revocation of the antidumping duty orders on ball bearings from France, 
Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom would be likely to lead 
to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission's 
determinations for Japan and the United Kingdom were appealed to the 
Court of International Trade. On September 9, 2008, the Court issued a 
decision remanding the matter to the Commission for further 
proceedings. NSK v. United States, Slip Op. 08-95 (Ct. Int'l Trade, 
Sept. 9, 2008). In its opinion, the Court issued an order instructing 
the Commission to (1) ``conduct a Bratsk analysis of non-subject 
imports as outlined in this opinion;''(2) ``reassess supply conditions 
within the domestic industry,'' i.e., the industry's restructuring 
efforts during the period of review, and (3) ``reexamine its findings 
with regard to likely impact and its decision to cumulate imports from 
the United Kingdom in light of changes in its determinations that may 
result as a consequence of the foregoing remand instructions.''
    Participation in the proceeding.--Only those persons who were 
interested parties to the reviews (i.e., persons listed on the 
Commission Secretary's service list) and parties to the appeal may 
participate in the remand proceeding. Such persons need not make any 
additional filings with the Commission to participate in the remand 
proceeding. Business proprietary information (``BPI'') referred to 
during the remand proceeding will be governed, as appropriate, by the 
administrative protective order issued in the reviews.
    Written submissions.--The Commission is re-opening the record in 
this proceeding to obtain information to conduct a Bratsk analysis of 
non-subject imports as outlined in the Court's opinion. The Commission 
will permit the parties to file comments pertaining to the specific 
issues that are the subject of the Court's remand instructions and, in 
this regard, may comment on the new information obtained on remand. 
Comments should be limited to no more than fifteen (15) double-spaced 
and single-sided pages of textual material. The parties may not 
themselves submit any new factual information in their comments and may 
not address any issue other than those that are the subject of the 
Court's remand instructions. Any such comments must be filed with the 
Commission no later than November 28, 2008.
    All written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 
201.8 of the Commission's rules; any submissions that contain BPI must 
also conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 
of the Commission's rules. The Commission's rules do not authorize 
filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic 
means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the 
Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (Nov. 8, 2002).
    In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's 
rules, each document filed by a party to the investigation must be 
served on all other

[[Page 62318]]

parties to the investigation (as identified by either the public or BPI 
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The 
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate 
of service.
    Parties are also advised to consult with the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 
201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for provisions of 
general applicability concerning written submissions to the Commission.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 14, 2008
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
 [FR Doc. E8-24890 Filed 10-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.