Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Permit Electronic Indicative FLEX Quotes, 59692-59694 [E8-23927]
Download as PDF
59692
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Notices
investors interested in FLEX Equity
Options with additional opportunities
to trade customized options in an
exchange environment, and investors
will benefit as a result.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
for 30 days from the date on which it
was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization has given the
Commission written notice of its intent
to file the proposed rule change at least
five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or
such shorter time as designated by the
Commission, the proposed rule change
has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 14 and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.15 At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission
may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
14 15
15 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Oct 08, 2008
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–102 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–102. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of the filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the self-regulatory
organization. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2008–102 and should be submitted on
or before October 30, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–23926 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
16 17
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58719; File No. SR–CBOE–
2008–103]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Permit Electronic
Indicative FLEX Quotes
October 2, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’)1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 30, 2008, the Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules related to Flexible Exchange
Options (‘‘FLEX Options’’) 5 in order to
adopt provisions codifying certain
electronic Indicative FLEX Quote
functionality. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Exchange’s
Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of
and basis for the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 FLEX Options provide investors with the ability
to customize basic option features including size,
expiration date, exercise style, and certain exercise
prices.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Notices
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to modify Rule 24B.14, FLEX
Official, and to include a new definition
of the term ‘‘Indicative FLEX Quote’’ in
Rule 24B.1, Definitions, in order to
make clear that non-binding electronic
indications of the market for particular
series of FLEX Options may be
periodically supplied by FLEX Traders 6
and displayed on the FLEX Hybrid
Trading System communications
network, which is made available to all
FLEX Traders that chose to receive the
information. Under the proposed rule
text, a FLEX Official 7 may call for such
Indicative FLEX quotes at any time
during the course of trading and with
respect to any series of FLEX Options
that the FLEX Official deems
appropriate. In addition, FLEX Traders
may call for Indicative FLEX Quotes,
updates thereto, or cancellations
thereof.
This ability to call for and provide
electronic Indicative FLEX Quotes is
somewhat like the Indicative FLEX
Quote functionality that CBOE
previously utilized on its open outcrybased FLEX RFQ System (the ‘‘legacy
FLEX system’’),8 except that under the
proposed FLEX Hybrid Trading System
application: FLEX Officials and all
FLEX Traders have the ability to
electronically request an Indicative
FLEX Quote (previously under the
legacy FLEX system, only FLEX
Officials had the ability to make a verbal
6 The reference to ‘‘FLEX Traders’’ includes any
Exchange members that have been approved by the
Exchange to use the FLEX Hybrid Trading System
and any non-member Sponsored Users that have
been provided electronic access, through
Sponsoring Members, to the FLEX Hybrid Trading
System in accordance with Rule 6.20A, Sponsored
Users.
7 The Exchange may at any time designate an
Exchange employee or independent contractor to
act as a FLEX Official in one or more classes of
FLEX Options. A FLEX Official performs the
functions set out in Rule 24B.14.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 31920
(February 24, 1993), 58 FR 12280 (March 3,
1993)(SR–CBOE–92–17)(approval of rule change
that, among other things, established the legacy
FLEX system rule provisions pertaining to
Indicative FLEX Quotes) and 56792 (November 15,
2007), 72 FR 65776 (November 23, 2007)(SR–
CBOE–2006–99)(approval of rule change that,
among other things, deleted the legacy FLEX system
rule provisions pertaining to Indicative FLEX
Quotes because the then-existing functionality was
no being longer utilized).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Oct 08, 2008
Jkt 217001
request on their own motion or at the
request of a Market-Maker); FLEX
Traders can now electronically
communicate their Indicative FLEX
Quotes (previously such quotes were
only verbalized by Market-Makers in
open outcry); and the information is
disseminated over the FLEX Hybrid
Trading System communications
network interface (previously the
information was disseminated at the
trading post and over a different
communications network). We believe
the ability to request and provide
Indicative FLEX Quotes over the
interface serves as a useful tool for FLEX
Traders to obtain information about
indicative FLEX markets, and the abovedescribed distinctions represent an
enhancement to the former process by
providing a more efficient and effective
means of communication.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6(b) of the
Act 9 and the rules and regulations
thereunder, in general, and Section
6(b)(5),10 in particular, in that it is
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts, to
remove impediments to and to perfect
the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system,
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest. The proposed rule
change allows FLEX Traders to more
efficiently and effectively communicate
information about indicative prices to
the benefit of customers.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i)
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
for 30 days from the date on which it
was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest, provided that the selfregulatory organization has given the
Commission written notice of its intent
to file the proposed rule change at least
five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or
such shorter time as designated by the
Commission, the proposed rule change
has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.12 At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission
may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for
the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–103 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–103. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
11 15
10 15
12 17
Sfmt 4703
59693
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
09OCN1
59694
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Notices
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of the filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the self-regulatory
organization. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2008–103 and should be submitted on
or before October 30, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–23927 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58730; File No. SR–DTC–
2008–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Depository Trust Company; Notice of
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To
Expand DTC’s Debit Cap Look-Ahead
Processing
October 3, 2008.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on
September 12, 2007, The Depository
Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which items have been
prepared primarily by DTC. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change would
amend the Look-Ahead Process in
DTC’s Settlement Services Guide to
allow Money Market Issuance Deliveries
pending for a Custodian’s or Dealer’s net
debit cap to complete against Maturity
13 17
1 15
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
21:01 Oct 08, 2008
Jkt 217001
Presentments pending for an Issuing/
Paying Agent’s net debit cap. DTC’s
processing system would calculate the
net effect of the dollar amount of
offsetting transactions in the accounts of
the two Participants involved. If the net
of the transactions would result in
positive risk management controls in
those two accounts, the transactions
would be completed.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
DTC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. DTC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.2
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
On June 10, 2003, the Commission
approved a proposed rule change to
establish a transaction Look-Ahead
Process which became available for
municipal and corporate bonds,
including Money Market Instruments
(‘‘MMIs’’).3 On August 11, 2004, the
Commission approved another proposed
rule change which expanded the
application and extended the benefit of
the Look-Ahead Process to all equity
transactions.4 With this proposed rule
change, DTC is proposing to expand the
Look-Ahead Process to MMIs.
The purpose of DTC’s Look-Ahead
Process is to reduce the number of
recycling transactions in the system
caused by the Net Debit Cap Risk
Management Control.5 The existing
Look-Ahead Process finds delivery
transactions that are pending because
the Receiving Participant has reached its
net debit cap.6 It then looks to see
2 The Commission has modified parts of these
statements.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48007
(June 10, 2003), 68 FR 35744 (June 16, 2003) (File
No. SR–DTC–2003–07).
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50182
(August 11, 2004), 69 FR 51341 (August 18, 2004)
(File No. SR–DTC–2004–05).
5 Net debit caps help ensure that DTC can
complete settlement, even if a Participant fails to
settle.
6 Before completing a transaction in which a
Participant is the receiver, DTC calculates the
resulting effect the transaction would have on the
Participant’s account and determines whether the
resulting net balance would exceed the Participant’s
net debit cap. Any transaction that would cause the
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
whether the Receiving Participant has a
pending delivery for the same security
to another Participant.7 In such a
situation, DTC’s Account Transaction
Processor (‘‘ATP’’) 8 will calculate the
net effect to the collateral 9 and net debit
cap controls for all three Participants
involved. If the net effect will not result
in a deficit in the collateral or net debit
cap controls for any of the three
Participants, ATP processes the
transactions simultaneously. Without
the Look-Ahead Process, the transaction
would pend in DTC’s system until
another transaction created sufficient
credit in the Receiving Participant’s
account. Most credits are generated
when a Participant delivers securities
versus payment, pledges securities for
value, receives principal, dividend or
other interest allocations, or wires funds
(a Settlement Progress Payment (‘‘SPP’’))
to DTC’s account at the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York in order to reduce its
DTC net debit.
In order to further reduce the number
of recycling transactions in the system
and to improve the timeliness and
certainty of transactions completing,
DTC is proposing to expand the LookAhead Process beyond same securities
for MMIs to allow pairs of money
market instrument transactions between
two Participants (i.e., an Issuing Paying
Agent [’’IPA’’] and a custodian or
dealer) that are pending for both party’s
net debit caps to complete. This
situation occurs when an IPA has a
delivery of a new money market
instrument to a custodian or a dealer for
X dollars and that same custodian or
dealer has a maturity of a money market
instrument of equal or greater value
awaiting acceptance by the same IPA.
The proposed rule change would allow
ATP to process those transactions
simultaneously, as long as neither
Participant’s risk management controls
were overridden.
Participant’s net settlement debit to exceed its net
debit cap is placed in a pending (recycling) queue
until another transaction creates credits in the
Participant’s account.
7 For example, Participant A is delivering shares
to Participant B and Participant B has a delivery
obligation of shares with the same CUSIP to
Participant C.
8 ATP is the core processing system for all
transaction activity affecting security positions held
at DTC.
9 DTC tracks collateral in a Participant’s account
through its Collateral Monitor (‘‘CM’’). At all times,
the CM reflects the amount by which the collateral
in the account exceeds the net debit in the account.
When processing a transaction, DTC verifies that
the deliverer’s and receiver’s CMs will not become
negative when the transaction completes. If the
transaction would cause either party to have a
negative CM, the transaction will recycle until the
deficient account has sufficient collateral for the
transaction to complete.
E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM
09OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59692-59694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23927]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-58719; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-103]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Permit Electronic Indicative FLEX Quotes
October 2, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 30, 2008, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated ( ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules related to Flexible
Exchange Options (``FLEX Options'') \5\ in order to adopt provisions
codifying certain electronic Indicative FLEX Quote functionality. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (https://www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ FLEX Options provide investors with the ability to customize
basic option features including size, expiration date, exercise
style, and certain exercise prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
[[Page 59693]]
The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to modify Rule 24B.14,
FLEX Official, and to include a new definition of the term ``Indicative
FLEX Quote'' in Rule 24B.1, Definitions, in order to make clear that
non-binding electronic indications of the market for particular series
of FLEX Options may be periodically supplied by FLEX Traders \6\ and
displayed on the FLEX Hybrid Trading System communications network,
which is made available to all FLEX Traders that chose to receive the
information. Under the proposed rule text, a FLEX Official \7\ may call
for such Indicative FLEX quotes at any time during the course of
trading and with respect to any series of FLEX Options that the FLEX
Official deems appropriate. In addition, FLEX Traders may call for
Indicative FLEX Quotes, updates thereto, or cancellations thereof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The reference to ``FLEX Traders'' includes any Exchange
members that have been approved by the Exchange to use the FLEX
Hybrid Trading System and any non-member Sponsored Users that have
been provided electronic access, through Sponsoring Members, to the
FLEX Hybrid Trading System in accordance with Rule 6.20A, Sponsored
Users.
\7\ The Exchange may at any time designate an Exchange employee
or independent contractor to act as a FLEX Official in one or more
classes of FLEX Options. A FLEX Official performs the functions set
out in Rule 24B.14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This ability to call for and provide electronic Indicative FLEX
Quotes is somewhat like the Indicative FLEX Quote functionality that
CBOE previously utilized on its open outcry-based FLEX RFQ System (the
``legacy FLEX system''),\8\ except that under the proposed FLEX Hybrid
Trading System application: FLEX Officials and all FLEX Traders have
the ability to electronically request an Indicative FLEX Quote
(previously under the legacy FLEX system, only FLEX Officials had the
ability to make a verbal request on their own motion or at the request
of a Market-Maker); FLEX Traders can now electronically communicate
their Indicative FLEX Quotes (previously such quotes were only
verbalized by Market-Makers in open outcry); and the information is
disseminated over the FLEX Hybrid Trading System communications network
interface (previously the information was disseminated at the trading
post and over a different communications network). We believe the
ability to request and provide Indicative FLEX Quotes over the
interface serves as a useful tool for FLEX Traders to obtain
information about indicative FLEX markets, and the above-described
distinctions represent an enhancement to the former process by
providing a more efficient and effective means of communication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 31920 (February 24,
1993), 58 FR 12280 (March 3, 1993)(SR-CBOE-92-17)(approval of rule
change that, among other things, established the legacy FLEX system
rule provisions pertaining to Indicative FLEX Quotes) and 56792
(November 15, 2007), 72 FR 65776 (November 23, 2007)(SR-CBOE-2006-
99)(approval of rule change that, among other things, deleted the
legacy FLEX system rule provisions pertaining to Indicative FLEX
Quotes because the then-existing functionality was no being longer
utilized).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) of the Act \9\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder, in general, and Section 6(b)(5),\10\ in
particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to
remove impediments to and to perfect the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The proposed rule change allows FLEX
Traders to more efficiently and effectively communicate information
about indicative prices to the benefit of customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2008-103 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-103. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than
[[Page 59694]]
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the self-regulatory
organization. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
CBOE-2008-103 and should be submitted on or before October 30, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-23927 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P