Antidumping Duty Order: Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide From the People's Republic of China, 58537-58538 [E8-23600]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 7, 2008 / Notices
Suzan.Winters@mail.doc.gov, Fax: (202)
482–2599.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
I. Abstract
The International Trade
Administration’s U.S. Commercial
Service is mandated by Congress to help
U.S. businesses, particularly small- and
medium-sized companies, export their
products and services to global markets.
As part of its mission, the U.S.
Commercial Service (CS) currently uses
customer satisfaction surveys to collect
feedback from U.S. business clients that
pay for services performed by CS. These
surveys ask the client to evaluate CS on
its customer service provision. The
results from the surveys are used to
make improvements to the agency’s
business processes in order to provide
better and more effective export
assistance to U.S. companies. In
addition to soliciting client feedback
after a service is delivered, the CS
would like to add a tagline with a link
to a Comment Card at the bottom of all
employees’ e-mail messages to enable
clients to submit feedback anytime they
see fit. The actual tagline would
encourage recipients of the e-mail to
click the Comment Card link and
provide feedback on service quality.
Samples of taglines could be similar to:
(1) ‘‘Please tell me about the quality
of service that I have provided to you;’’
or
(2) ‘‘Please let me know how well I
have served you.’’
A link to a Comment Card would
immediately follow the tagline. The
purpose of the attached card is to collect
feedback from U.S. businesses that
interact with CS employees. This
information will be used for quality
assurance purposes. Survey responses
will be used to assess client satisfaction,
identify client issues, record client
results and recognize exemplary service
providers.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
II. Method of Collection
Comment Card link embedded in
employees’ e-mail taglines; clients will
fill out and submit the Comment Cards
electronically.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,000.
Estimated Time Per Response: 5–10
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 833.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Oct 06, 2008
Jkt 217001
IV. Request for Comments
Dated: October 1, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–23560 Filed 10–6–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–919]
Antidumping Duty Order: Electrolytic
Manganese Dioxide From the People’s
Republic of China
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: Based on an affirmative final
determination by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC),
the Department is issuing an
antidumping duty order on electrolytic
manganese dioxide (EMD) from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC).
DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eugene Degnan at (202) 482–0414,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 18, 2008, the Department
published the final determination of
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58537
sales at less than fair value of EMD from
the PRC. See Electrolytic Manganese
Dioxide From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 48195
(August 18, 2008) (‘‘Final
Determination’’).
On August 18, 2008, Guizhou Redstar
Developing Import & Export Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Redstar’’) submitted ministerial error
allegations with respect to the
Department’s Final Determination. On
August 25, 2008, Tronox LLC,
Petitioner, submitted a reply to
Redstar’s ministerial error allegations,
arguing that the Department should
reject each of Redstar’s claims. On
October 1, 2008, the Department
determined that Redstar’s ministerial
error allegations do not meet the
requirements under 19 CFR 351.224(f)
to be considered ministerial errors. See
Memorandum entitled ‘‘Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from
the People’s Republic of China:
Allegations of Ministerial Errors,’’ dated
October 1, 2008.
On September 26, 2008, the ITC
notified the Department of its final
determination pursuant to section
735(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), that an industry in
the United States is materially injured
within the meaning of section
735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act by reason of
less-than-fair-value imports of EMD
from the PRC. See Letter from the ITC
to the Secretary of Commerce,
‘‘Notification of Final Affirmative
Determination of Electrolytic
Manganese Dioxide from Australia and
from the People’s Republic of China,’’
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1124 and
1125 (September 26, 2008). Pursuant to
section 736(a) of the Act, the
Department is publishing an
antidumping duty order on the subject
merchandise.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order includes all manganese dioxide
(MnO2) that has been manufactured in
an electrolysis process, whether in
powder, chip, or plate form. Excluded
from the scope are natural manganese
dioxide (NMD) and chemical manganese
dioxide (CMD). The merchandise
subject to this order is classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) at subheading
2820.10.00.00. While the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this order is
dispositive.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
58538
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 7, 2008 / Notices
Antidumping Duty Order
In accordance with section 736(a)(1)
of the Act, the Department will direct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess, upon further
information from the Department,
antidumping duties equal to the amount
by which the normal value of the
merchandise exceeds the export price
(or the constructed export price) of the
merchandise for all relevant entries of
EMD from the PRC. These antidumping
duties will be assessed on all entries of
EMD entered, or withdrawn from the
warehouse, for consumption on or after
March 26, 2008, the date on which the
Department published its notice of
preliminary determination in the
Federal Register. See Electrolytic
Manganese Dioxide from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Postponement of Final
Determination, 73 FR 15988 (March 26,
2008).
Section 733(d) of the Act states that
instructions issued pursuant to an
affirmative preliminary determination
may not remain in effect for more than
four months except where exporters
representing a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise
request the Department to extend that
four-month period to no more than six
months. At the request of the exporters
that account for a significant proportion
of EMD in the PRC, we extended the
four-month period to no more than six
months. See Letter from Guizhou
Redstar Developing Import and Export
Company, Ltd. (March 11, 2008). In the
underlying investigation, the six-month
period beginning on the date of the
publication of the preliminary
determination ended on September 22,
2008. Furthermore, section 737(b) of the
Act states that definitive duties are to
begin on the date of publication of the
ITC’s final injury determination.
Therefore, in accordance with section
733(d) of the Act and our practice, we
will instruct CBP to terminate the
suspension of liquidation and to
liquidate, without regard to
antidumping duties, unliquidated
entries of EMD from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after September 22,
2008, through the day preceding the
date of publication of the ITC’s final
injury determination in the Federal
Register.
On and after the date of publication
of the ITC’s notice of final
determination in the Federal Register,
CBP will require, at the same time as
importers would normally deposit
estimated duties on this merchandise,
cash deposits for the subject
merchandise equal to the estimated
weighted-average antidumping margins
listed below.
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Exporter
Producer
Guizhou Redstar Developing Import and Export Company, Ltd ..
Guizhou Redstar Developing Dalong Manganese Industrial Co.,
Ltd.
149.92
PRC-Wide Entity ...........................................................................
......................................................................................................
149.92
This notice constitutes the
antidumping duty order with respect to
EMD from the PRC, pursuant to section
736(a) of the Act. Interested parties may
contact the Department’s Central
Records Unit, Room 1117 of the Main
Commerce Building, for copies of an
updated list of antidumping duty orders
currently in effect.
This order is issued and published in
accordance with section 736(a) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.211(b).
SUMMARY: Based on an affirmative final
determination by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC),
the Department is issuing the
antidumping duty order on electrolytic
manganese dioxide (EMD) from
Australia.
DATES:
Effective Date: October 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: October 1, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–23600 Filed 10–6–08; 8:45 am]
Hermes Pinilla at (202) 482–3477 or
Minoo Hatten at (202) 482–1690, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Background
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
[A–602–806]
Antidumping Duty Order: Electrolytic
Manganese Dioxide From Australia
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:23 Oct 06, 2008
Jkt 217001
On August 14, 2008, the Department
published the final determination of
sales at less than fair value of EMD from
Australia. See Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Termination of CriticalCircumstances Investigation:
Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from
Australia, 73 FR 47586 (August 14,
2008).
On September 26, 2008, the ITC
notified the Department of its final
determination pursuant to section
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
735(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), that an industry in
the United States is materially injured
within the meaning of section
735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act by reason of
less-than-fair-value imports of EMD
from Australia. See Letter from the ITC
to the Secretary of Commerce,
‘‘Notification of Final Affirmative
Determination of Electrolytic
Manganese Dioxide from Australia and
the People’s Republic of China,’’
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1124 and
1125 (September 26, 2008). Pursuant to
section 736(a) of the Act, the
Department is publishing an
antidumping duty order on the subject
merchandise.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order includes all manganese dioxide
(MnO2) that has been manufactured in
an electrolysis process, whether in
powder, chip, or plate form. Excluded
from the scope are natural manganese
dioxide (NMD) and chemical manganese
dioxide (CMD). The merchandise
subject to this order is classified in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) at subheading
2820.10.00.00. While the HTSUS
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58537-58538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23600]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-919]
Antidumping Duty Order: Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide From the
People's Republic of China
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: Based on an affirmative final determination by the Department
of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission
(ITC), the Department is issuing an antidumping duty order on
electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) from the People's Republic of
China (PRC).
DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Degnan at (202) 482-0414,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 18, 2008, the Department published the final
determination of sales at less than fair value of EMD from the PRC. See
Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide From the People's Republic of China:
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 48195
(August 18, 2008) (``Final Determination'').
On August 18, 2008, Guizhou Redstar Developing Import & Export Co.,
Ltd. (``Redstar'') submitted ministerial error allegations with respect
to the Department's Final Determination. On August 25, 2008, Tronox
LLC, Petitioner, submitted a reply to Redstar's ministerial error
allegations, arguing that the Department should reject each of
Redstar's claims. On October 1, 2008, the Department determined that
Redstar's ministerial error allegations do not meet the requirements
under 19 CFR 351.224(f) to be considered ministerial errors. See
Memorandum entitled ``Final Results of Antidumping Duty Investigation
of Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from the People's Republic of China:
Allegations of Ministerial Errors,'' dated October 1, 2008.
On September 26, 2008, the ITC notified the Department of its final
determination pursuant to section 735(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), that an industry in the United States is materially
injured within the meaning of section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act by
reason of less-than-fair-value imports of EMD from the PRC. See Letter
from the ITC to the Secretary of Commerce, ``Notification of Final
Affirmative Determination of Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from
Australia and from the People's Republic of China,'' Investigation Nos.
731-TA-1124 and 1125 (September 26, 2008). Pursuant to section 736(a)
of the Act, the Department is publishing an antidumping duty order on
the subject merchandise.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order includes all manganese
dioxide (MnO2) that has been manufactured in an electrolysis
process, whether in powder, chip, or plate form. Excluded from the
scope are natural manganese dioxide (NMD) and chemical manganese
dioxide (CMD). The merchandise subject to this order is classified in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at
subheading 2820.10.00.00. While the HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope
of this order is dispositive.
[[Page 58538]]
Antidumping Duty Order
In accordance with section 736(a)(1) of the Act, the Department
will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess, upon
further information from the Department, antidumping duties equal to
the amount by which the normal value of the merchandise exceeds the
export price (or the constructed export price) of the merchandise for
all relevant entries of EMD from the PRC. These antidumping duties will
be assessed on all entries of EMD entered, or withdrawn from the
warehouse, for consumption on or after March 26, 2008, the date on
which the Department published its notice of preliminary determination
in the Federal Register. See Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide from the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 73 FR 15988
(March 26, 2008).
Section 733(d) of the Act states that instructions issued pursuant
to an affirmative preliminary determination may not remain in effect
for more than four months except where exporters representing a
significant proportion of exports of the subject merchandise request
the Department to extend that four-month period to no more than six
months. At the request of the exporters that account for a significant
proportion of EMD in the PRC, we extended the four-month period to no
more than six months. See Letter from Guizhou Redstar Developing Import
and Export Company, Ltd. (March 11, 2008). In the underlying
investigation, the six-month period beginning on the date of the
publication of the preliminary determination ended on September 22,
2008. Furthermore, section 737(b) of the Act states that definitive
duties are to begin on the date of publication of the ITC's final
injury determination. Therefore, in accordance with section 733(d) of
the Act and our practice, we will instruct CBP to terminate the
suspension of liquidation and to liquidate, without regard to
antidumping duties, unliquidated entries of EMD from the PRC entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after September 22,
2008, through the day preceding the date of publication of the ITC's
final injury determination in the Federal Register.
On and after the date of publication of the ITC's notice of final
determination in the Federal Register, CBP will require, at the same
time as importers would normally deposit estimated duties on this
merchandise, cash deposits for the subject merchandise equal to the
estimated weighted-average antidumping margins listed below.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter Producer margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guizhou Redstar Developing Import Guizhou Redstar 149.92
and Export Company, Ltd. Developing Dalong
Manganese Industrial
Co., Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity.................. ........................ 149.92
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice constitutes the antidumping duty order with respect to
EMD from the PRC, pursuant to section 736(a) of the Act. Interested
parties may contact the Department's Central Records Unit, Room 1117 of
the Main Commerce Building, for copies of an updated list of
antidumping duty orders currently in effect.
This order is issued and published in accordance with section
736(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.211(b).
Dated: October 1, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-23600 Filed 10-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P