Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Rule 104(e) (Dealings by Specialists) To Modify the Conditions Governing the Specialists' Use of the Price Improvement Trading Message Pursuant to NYSE Rule 104(b)(i)(H), 53914-53915 [E8-21707]
Download as PDF
53914
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 17, 2008 / Notices
proposal may become operative, and the
suspended rule may be reinstated,
immediately upon filing. The Exchange
believes that, while a suspension of
Rule 123D(3) for Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac securities was warranted
by the Treasury Department’s actions,
the immediate benefits of suspending
that rule have diminished, and that
therefore it is consistent with the
Exchange Act that the rule be reinstated
as expeditiously as possible, since the
reinstated rule would prevent the
Exchange from executing transactions in
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac securities
at prices below $1.00 that may violate
Regulation NMS.
The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Commission therefore grants the
Exchange’s request and designates the
proposal to be operative upon filing.18
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–NYSE–2008–83 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2008–83. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
18 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay of this proposal, the Commission
has considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Sep 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of NYSE. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2008–83 and should be submitted on or
before October 8, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–21704 Filed 9–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58517; File No. SR–NYSE–
2008–61]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change
Amending NYSE Rule 104(e) (Dealings
by Specialists) To Modify the
Conditions Governing the Specialists’
Use of the Price Improvement Trading
Message Pursuant to NYSE Rule
104(b)(i)(H)
September 11, 2008.
On July 25, 2008, the New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to modify the rule governing the
specialists’ use of the price
improvement trading message. The
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
August 7, 2008.3 The Commission
received no comments regarding the
proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
Pursuant to NYSE Rule 104(b),
specialists may use algorithms to
generate quoting and trading messages.
Such trading messages may provide
price improvement to an order, subject
to the conditions set forth in Rule
104(e). In order to provide price
improvement to a marketable incoming
order, Rule 104(e)(i) requires that the
specialist must be represented in the bid
or offer in a ‘‘meaningful amount.’’ Rule
104(e)(ii) defines ‘‘meaningful amount’’
as at least ten round-lots for the 100
most active securities on the Exchange,
based on average daily volume, and at
least five round-lots for all other
securities on the Exchange. NYSE
proposes to delete the requirement in
Rule 104(e)(i) that specialists must be
represented in a bid or offer in a
meaningful amount to provide price
improvement to the incoming order.4
The Commission has carefully
reviewed the proposed rule change and
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange,5 and, in particular,
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,6 which
requires, among other things, that NYSE
rules be designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
As NYSE stated in its proposal,
average quote sizes on the Exchange
have decreased in recent years.7
Because of this, the Exchange believes
the meaningful amount requirement for
price improvement is a deterrent to
specialists’ participation in price
improvement. The Commission believes
that deletion of the meaningful amount
requirement should encourage greater
participation by specialists in the
Exchange’s price improvement
mechanism. At the same time, the
Commission must carefully review
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58278
(July 31, 2008), 73 FR 46124 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 As part of this rule change, NYSE also proposes
deleting the definition of ‘‘meaningful amount’’ in
Rule 104(e)(ii).
5 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
7 See Notice supra note 3, at 46125.
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 17, 2008 / Notices
trading rule proposals that seek to offer
special advantages to market
participants. Although an exchange may
reward its participants for the benefits
they provide to the exchange’s market,
such rewards must not be
disproportionate to the services
provided.8 In considering the totality of
the benefits accorded to and obligations
imposed upon specialists on the
Exchange, the Commission believes that
it is reasonable for NYSE to delete the
‘‘meaningful amount’’ requirement of
Rule 104(e).9
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2008–
61) be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–21707 Filed 9–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58512; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2008–85]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Listing and Trading of
Shares of the PowerShares Active U.S.
Real Estate Fund
September 11, 2008.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
On August 11, 2008, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’), through
its wholly owned subsidiary, NYSE
Arca Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca
Equities’’), filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to list and trade
shares (‘‘Shares’’) of the PowerShares
Active U.S. Real Estate Fund (‘‘Fund’’)
under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600.
The proposed rule change was
published in the Federal Register on
August 26, 2008 for a 15-day comment
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58092
(July 3, 2008), 73 FR 40144 (July 11, 2008) at 40148.
9 The Commission notes that, through a separate
proposed rule change, the Exchange has proposed
to eliminate all of the provisions relating to the
specialists’ price improvement mechanism under
NYSE Rule 104(e) by October 15, 2008. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58184 (July 17,
2008), 73 FR 42853 (July 23, 2008) (SR–NYSE–
2008–46).
10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:38 Sep 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
period.3 The Commission received no
comments on the proposal. This order
grants approval to the proposed rule
change on an accelerated basis.
I. Description of the Proposal
The Exchange proposes to list and
trade the Shares pursuant to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.600, which governs the
listing of Managed Fund Shares.4 The
Exchange states that the Shares will
conform to the initial and continued
listing criteria under that rule.
The Shares will be offered by
PowerShares Actively Managed
Exchange-Traded Fund Trust (‘‘Trust’’),5
a business trust organized under the
laws of the State of Delaware and
registered with the Commission as an
open-end management investment
company. The Exchange states that the
Fund will not purchase or sell securities
in markets outside the United States.
The Exchange represents that, for initial
and/or continued listing, the Fund will
be in compliance with Rule 10A–3
under the Act,6 as provided by NYSE
Arca Equities Rule 5.3.
A. Description of the Fund
Invesco PowerShares Capital
Management LLC (‘‘Adviser’’) is the
investment adviser for the Fund and is
registered as an ‘‘investment adviser’’
under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940 (‘‘Advisers Act’’).7 Invesco
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58395
(August 20, 2008), 73 FR 50382.
4 A Managed Fund Share is a security that
represents an interest in an investment company
registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a) (‘‘1940 Act’’) organized as an
open-end management investment company or
similar entity that invests in a portfolio of securities
selected by its investment adviser consistent with
its investment objectives and policies. In contrast,
an open-end investment company that issues
Investment Company Units, listed and traded on
the Exchange under NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(3), seeks to provide investment results that
correspond generally to the price and yield
performance of a specific foreign or domestic stock
index, fixed income securities index, or a
combination thereof.
5 The Trust is registered under the 1940 Act. On
June 26, 2008, the Trust filed with the Commission
a Registration Statement for the Fund on Form N–
1A under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a)
and under the 1940 Act relating to the Fund (File
Nos. 333–147622 and 811–22148) (‘‘Registration
Statement’’). The Exchange states that the
description of the operation of the Trust herein is
based on the Registration Statement.
6 17 CFR 240.10A–3.
7 15 U.S.C. 80b–1. The Exchange represents that
the Adviser and its related personnel are subject to
Rule 204A–1 under the Advisers Act (17 CFR
275.204A–1). This rule specifically requires the
adoption of a code of ethics by an investment
adviser to include, at a minimum: (1) A standard
or standards of business conduct that reflect the
fiduciary obligations of such investment adviser
and its supervised persons; (2) provisions requiring
its supervised persons to comply with applicable
federal securities laws; (3) provisions that require
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53915
Institutional (N.A.), Inc. is the Fund’s
primary investment sub-adviser and is
also registered as an ‘‘investment
adviser’’ under the Advisers Act.
Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc. (the
‘‘Distributor’’) serves as the principal
underwriter and distributor for the
Fund.8
The Exchange states that, according to
the Registration Statement, the Fund has
an investment objective of high total
return through growth of capital and
current income. It seeks to achieve its
investment objective by investing, under
normal market conditions, at least 80%
of its assets in securities of companies
that are principally engaged in the U.S.
real estate industry.9 Specifically, the
Fund plans to invest principally in
equity real estate investment trusts
(‘‘REITs’’). Equity REITs pool investors’’
funds for investments primarily in real
estate properties or real estate-related
loans (e.g., mortgages). The Fund may
also invest in real estate operating
companies (‘‘REOCs’’), as well as
securities of other companies
all access persons to report, and such investment
adviser to review, their personal securities
transactions and holdings periodically as
specifically set forth in Rule 204A–1; (4) provisions
requiring supervised persons to report any
violations of the code of ethics promptly to the
chief compliance officer (‘‘CCO’’) or, provided the
CCO also receives reports of all violations, to other
persons designated in the code of ethics; and (5)
provisions requiring the investment adviser to
provide each of its supervised persons with a copy
of the code of ethics and any amendments, and
requiring its supervised persons to provide to such
investment adviser written acknowledgement of
their receipt of the code and any amendments. In
addition, Rule 206(4)–7 under the Advisers Act
makes it unlawful for an investment adviser to
provide investment advice to clients unless such
investment adviser has (i) adopted and
implemented written policies and procedures
reasonably designed to prevent violation, by the
investment adviser and its supervised persons, of
the Advisers Act and the rules adopted thereunder,
(ii) reviewed no less frequently than annually the
adequacy of the policies and procedures established
pursuant to (i) above and the effectiveness of their
implementation, and (iii) designated an individual
(who is a supervised person) responsible for
administering the policies and procedures adopted
under (i) above. See 17 CFR 275.206(4)–7.
8 The Exchange states that the Adviser is affiliated
with the Distributor, a broker-dealer. As required by
Commentary .07 to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600,
the Exchange represents that the Adviser has
implemented a ‘‘fire wall’’ with respect to such
broker-dealer regarding access to information
concerning the composition and/or changes to the
Fund’s portfolio. Commentary .07 to NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.600 also requires personnel, who
make decisions on the portfolio composition of the
Fund, must be subject to procedures designed to
prevent the use and dissemination of material
nonpublic information regarding the applicable
Fund’s portfolio.
9 A company is considered to be principally
engaged in the U.S. real estate industry if: (i) It
derives 50% of its revenues or profits from the
ownership, leasing, construction, financing, or sale
of U.S. real estate; or (ii) it has at least 50% of the
value of its assets invested in U.S. real estate.
E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM
17SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53914-53915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21707]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-58517; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-61]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Rule 104(e) (Dealings by
Specialists) To Modify the Conditions Governing the Specialists' Use of
the Price Improvement Trading Message Pursuant to NYSE Rule
104(b)(i)(H)
September 11, 2008.
On July 25, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to modify the rule governing the specialists' use
of the price improvement trading message. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on August 7, 2008.\3\ The
Commission received no comments regarding the proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58278 (July 31,
2008), 73 FR 46124 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to NYSE Rule 104(b), specialists may use algorithms to
generate quoting and trading messages. Such trading messages may
provide price improvement to an order, subject to the conditions set
forth in Rule 104(e). In order to provide price improvement to a
marketable incoming order, Rule 104(e)(i) requires that the specialist
must be represented in the bid or offer in a ``meaningful amount.''
Rule 104(e)(ii) defines ``meaningful amount'' as at least ten round-
lots for the 100 most active securities on the Exchange, based on
average daily volume, and at least five round-lots for all other
securities on the Exchange. NYSE proposes to delete the requirement in
Rule 104(e)(i) that specialists must be represented in a bid or offer
in a meaningful amount to provide price improvement to the incoming
order.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ As part of this rule change, NYSE also proposes deleting the
definition of ``meaningful amount'' in Rule 104(e)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission has carefully reviewed the proposed rule change and
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements
of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange,\5\ and, in particular, Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,\6\ which requires, among other things, that NYSE rules be
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As NYSE stated in its proposal, average quote sizes on the Exchange
have decreased in recent years.\7\ Because of this, the Exchange
believes the meaningful amount requirement for price improvement is a
deterrent to specialists' participation in price improvement. The
Commission believes that deletion of the meaningful amount requirement
should encourage greater participation by specialists in the Exchange's
price improvement mechanism. At the same time, the Commission must
carefully review
[[Page 53915]]
trading rule proposals that seek to offer special advantages to market
participants. Although an exchange may reward its participants for the
benefits they provide to the exchange's market, such rewards must not
be disproportionate to the services provided.\8\ In considering the
totality of the benefits accorded to and obligations imposed upon
specialists on the Exchange, the Commission believes that it is
reasonable for NYSE to delete the ``meaningful amount'' requirement of
Rule 104(e).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Notice supra note 3, at 46125.
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58092 (July 3,
2008), 73 FR 40144 (July 11, 2008) at 40148.
\9\ The Commission notes that, through a separate proposed rule
change, the Exchange has proposed to eliminate all of the provisions
relating to the specialists' price improvement mechanism under NYSE
Rule 104(e) by October 15, 2008. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 58184 (July 17, 2008), 73 FR 42853 (July 23, 2008) (SR-NYSE-
2008-46).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2008-61) be, and it hereby is,
approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21707 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P