Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Related to Trades in Restricted Classes, 53060-53062 [E8-21164]
Download as PDF
53060
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices
Temporary Member access fee and the
proposed Temporary Member access fee
itself are appropriate for the same
reasons set forth in CBOE rule filing SR–
CBOE–2008–12 with respect to the
original Temporary Member access fee.7
Similarly, the Exchange believes that
the process used to set the proposed ITP
access fee and the proposed ITP access
fee itself are appropriate for the same
reasons set forth in CBOE rule filing SR–
CBOE–2008–77 with respect to the
original ITP access fee.8
Each of the proposed access fees will
remain in effect until such time either
that the Exchange submits a further rule
filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Act 9 to modify the applicable
access fee or the applicable status (i.e.,
the Temporary Membership status or
the ITP status) is terminated.
Accordingly, the Exchange may, and
likely will, further adjust the proposed
access fees in the future if the Exchange
determines that it would be appropriate
to do so taking into consideration lease
rates for transferable CBOE
memberships prevailing at that time.
The procedural provisions of the
CBOE Fee Schedule related to the
assessment of each proposed access fee
are not proposed to be changed and will
remain the same as the current
procedural provisions relating to the
assessment of that access fee.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,10 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act,11 in particular, in that it is
designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among persons using its
facilities.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57293
(February 8, 2008), 73 FR 8729 (February 14, 2008)
(SR–CBOE–2008–12), which established the
original Temporary Member access fee, for detail
regarding the rationale in support of the original
Temporary Member access fee and the process used
to set that fee, which is also applicable to this
proposed change to the Temporary Member access
fee as well.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58200
(July 21, 2008), 73 FR 43805 (July 28, 2008) (SR–
CBOE–2008–77), which established the original ITP
access fee, for detail regarding the rationale in
support of the original ITP access fee and the
process used to set that fee, which is also applicable
to this proposed change to the ITP access fee as
well.
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
15:18 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing rule change
establishes or changes a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the Exchange,
it has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 12 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 13
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–CBOE–2008–93 and should be
submitted on or before October 3, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–21162 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–93 on the
subject line.
[Release No. 34–58460; File No. SR–CBOE–
2008–90]
Paper Comments
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
VerDate Aug<31>2005
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
September 4, 2008.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–93. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August
29, 2008, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change Related to
Trades in Restricted Classes
14 17
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.25, Nullification and Adjustment
of Equity Options Transactions, and
Rule 24.16, Nullification and
Adjustment of Transactions in Index
Options, Options on ETFs and Options
on HOLDRS. The Exchange is proposing
to amend the rules to permit the
nullification of opening transactions
that do not satisfy the requirements of
Rule 5.4, Withdrawal of Approval of
Underlying Securities. The Exchange is
also proposing to amend Rule 5.4 to
make clear that its restrictions on
opening transactions, which apply to
previously opened options series of a
class that no longer meets the then
current requirements for trading, apply
to both opening purchase transactions
and opening sell transactions. Currently
the rule text only references opening
purchase transactions. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Office of the
Secretary, CBOE and at the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend
its obvious error rules to permit the
nullification of opening transactions in
‘‘restricted series’’ that do not satisfy the
requirements of Rule 5.4.3 Currently,
3 In relevant part, Rule 5.4 provides that,
whenever the Exchange determines that an
underlying security previously approved for
Exchange option transactions does not meet the
then current requirements for continuance of such
approval or for any other reason should no longer
be approved, the Exchange will not open for trading
any additional series of options of the class
covering that underlying security and therefore two
floor officials, in consultation with a designated
senior executive officer of the Exchange, may
prohibit any opening purchase transactions in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
when the Exchange makes a
determination that trading in a series is
restricted pursuant to Rule 5.4, the
Exchange notifies the membership of
that determination through issuance of
a regulatory circular. In addition, the
Exchange’s systems are programmed to
automatically restrict the entry of
electronic opening transactions.
However, opening orders entered in
open outcry are not systemically
prevented and, in addition, opening
market-maker activity is still permitted
both electronically and in open outcry.
As a result, it is possible that an opening
transaction that does not satisfy the
requirements of Rule 5.4 may occur
inadvertently.
In order to address these scenarios,
the Exchange is proposing to permit the
nullification of opening transactions in
a Rule 5.4 restricted series provided
notification is received by designated
personnel in the Exchange’s control
room from any member or person
associated with a member that believes
it participated in such transaction
within the timeframes prescribed in
Rules 6.25(b)(1) and 24.16(b)(1). In
addition, absent unusual circumstances,
designated personnel in the control
room (either on their own motion or
upon request of a member) would
initiate action within sixty (60) minutes
of such a transaction. Such actions
would be reviewed and determinations
rendered by the senior official in the
control room. The Exchange believes it
is reasonable and appropriate for the
senior official to render these decisions
given the simple and objective nature of
this particular type of proposed obvious
error, which involves opening
transactions in a series in which the
Exchange has restricted opening trading
activity pursuant to Rule 5.4.4 The
series of options of that class previously opened
(except that (i) opening transactions by MarketMakers executed to accommodate closing
transactions of other market participants and (ii)
opening transactions by CBOE member
organizations to facilitate the closing transactions of
public customers executed as crosses pursuant to
and in accordance with paragraph (b) or (d) of Rule
6.74, Crossing Orders, may be permitted), to the
extent it deems such action necessary or
appropriate (such series are referred to herein and
in the proposed new text in Rules 6.25 and 24.16
as ‘‘restricted series’’); provided, however, that
where exceptional circumstances have caused an
underlying security not to comply with the
Exchange’s current approval maintenance
requirements, regarding number of publicly held
shares or publicly held principal amount, number
of shareholders, trading volume or market price the
Exchange, in the interest of maintaining a fair and
orderly market or for the protection of investors,
may determine to continue to open additional series
of option contracts of the class covering that
underlying security.
4 The senior official in the control room has
authority to render other determinations elsewhere
in our rules. For example, if the Hybrid Trading
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
53061
Exchange also notes that any
determinations rendered by the senior
official would be subject to the same
review procedures as determinations
rendered by Trading Officials.
In connection with this rule change,
the Exchange is proposing to clarify that
an obvious error rule action may be
initiated by a member through
contacting either a Trading Official or
designated personnel in the control
room.5 Currently the rule simply
references Trading Officials, which
includes several of the Exchange staff in
our control room. Thus, for
administrative convenience, we wish to
clarify that simply contacting Trading
Officials or designated personnel in the
control room is sufficient to initiate
action. Once either a Trading Official or
a control room designee is contacted, all
reviews and determinations shall
continue to be rendered by the Trading
Officials except that, as proposed
herein, actions to nullify an opening
trade in a restricted series shall be
reviewed and determinations rendered
by the senior official in the control
room.
Lastly, the Exchange is proposing to
clarify in the text of Rule 5.4 that the
restrictions on opening transactions
contained in the rule, as well as the
related exceptions, apply to both
opening purchases and opening sales in
restricted series. Currently, the rule text
indicates that the restrictions are
applicable only to opening purchase
transactions; however, it is the
Exchange’s intention that the restriction,
and related exceptions, should also
apply to opening sales. Proposed
changes to the rule text make this clear.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act 6 and the rules and regulations
thereunder and, in particular, the
requirements of section 6(b) of the Act.7
Specifically, the Exchange believes the
System has not opened a series of a class because
there is no quote present that complies with the
legal width requirements or the opening price is not
within an acceptable range, the senior official in the
control room may authorize the opening of the
affected series where necessary to ensure a fair and
orderly market. See paragraph (f) of Rule 6.2B,
Hybrid Opening System (‘‘HOSS’’).
5 We note that the procedures of other markets
currently allow for the initiation of an obvious error
review by contacting designated personnel in their
respective control rooms. See, e.g., International
Securities Exchange (‘‘ISE’’) Rule 720, Obvious and
Catastrophic Errors (which provides that ISE
members who believe they participated in a
transaction that was an obvious error must notify
designated personnel in ISE’s market control center
to initiate a review).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
53062
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices
proposed rule change is consistent with
the section 6(b)(5) 8 requirements that
the rules of an exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts, to remove
impediments to and to perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The proposed rule
change would help the Exchange more
efficiently address scenarios where an
opening transaction that does not satisfy
the requirements of Rule 5.4 may occur
inadvertently.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–90. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–90 and should
be submitted on or before September 29,
2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–21164 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–CBOE–2008–90 on the
subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58462; File No. SR–CBOE–
2008–91]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change by Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Inc. Amending CBOE Rule
52.3
September 4, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on August
27, 2008, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CBOE’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change described in Items I, and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
CBOE Rule 52.3 in order to clarify a
circumstance under which the Exchange
will commence a trading halt in
Derivative Securities Products listed
and trading on the Exchange.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Sep 11, 2008
9 17
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53060-53062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21164]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-58460; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-90]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Related to
Trades in Restricted Classes
September 4, 2008.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 29, 2008, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 53061]]
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.25, Nullification and
Adjustment of Equity Options Transactions, and Rule 24.16,
Nullification and Adjustment of Transactions in Index Options, Options
on ETFs and Options on HOLDRS. The Exchange is proposing to amend the
rules to permit the nullification of opening transactions that do not
satisfy the requirements of Rule 5.4, Withdrawal of Approval of
Underlying Securities. The Exchange is also proposing to amend Rule 5.4
to make clear that its restrictions on opening transactions, which
apply to previously opened options series of a class that no longer
meets the then current requirements for trading, apply to both opening
purchase transactions and opening sell transactions. Currently the rule
text only references opening purchase transactions. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (https://
www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Office of the Secretary, CBOE and at the
Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to amend its obvious error rules to
permit the nullification of opening transactions in ``restricted
series'' that do not satisfy the requirements of Rule 5.4.\3\
Currently, when the Exchange makes a determination that trading in a
series is restricted pursuant to Rule 5.4, the Exchange notifies the
membership of that determination through issuance of a regulatory
circular. In addition, the Exchange's systems are programmed to
automatically restrict the entry of electronic opening transactions.
However, opening orders entered in open outcry are not systemically
prevented and, in addition, opening market-maker activity is still
permitted both electronically and in open outcry. As a result, it is
possible that an opening transaction that does not satisfy the
requirements of Rule 5.4 may occur inadvertently.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In relevant part, Rule 5.4 provides that, whenever the
Exchange determines that an underlying security previously approved
for Exchange option transactions does not meet the then current
requirements for continuance of such approval or for any other
reason should no longer be approved, the Exchange will not open for
trading any additional series of options of the class covering that
underlying security and therefore two floor officials, in
consultation with a designated senior executive officer of the
Exchange, may prohibit any opening purchase transactions in series
of options of that class previously opened (except that (i) opening
transactions by Market-Makers executed to accommodate closing
transactions of other market participants and (ii) opening
transactions by CBOE member organizations to facilitate the closing
transactions of public customers executed as crosses pursuant to and
in accordance with paragraph (b) or (d) of Rule 6.74, Crossing
Orders, may be permitted), to the extent it deems such action
necessary or appropriate (such series are referred to herein and in
the proposed new text in Rules 6.25 and 24.16 as ``restricted
series''); provided, however, that where exceptional circumstances
have caused an underlying security not to comply with the Exchange's
current approval maintenance requirements, regarding number of
publicly held shares or publicly held principal amount, number of
shareholders, trading volume or market price the Exchange, in the
interest of maintaining a fair and orderly market or for the
protection of investors, may determine to continue to open
additional series of option contracts of the class covering that
underlying security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to address these scenarios, the Exchange is proposing to
permit the nullification of opening transactions in a Rule 5.4
restricted series provided notification is received by designated
personnel in the Exchange's control room from any member or person
associated with a member that believes it participated in such
transaction within the timeframes prescribed in Rules 6.25(b)(1) and
24.16(b)(1). In addition, absent unusual circumstances, designated
personnel in the control room (either on their own motion or upon
request of a member) would initiate action within sixty (60) minutes of
such a transaction. Such actions would be reviewed and determinations
rendered by the senior official in the control room. The Exchange
believes it is reasonable and appropriate for the senior official to
render these decisions given the simple and objective nature of this
particular type of proposed obvious error, which involves opening
transactions in a series in which the Exchange has restricted opening
trading activity pursuant to Rule 5.4.\4\ The Exchange also notes that
any determinations rendered by the senior official would be subject to
the same review procedures as determinations rendered by Trading
Officials.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The senior official in the control room has authority to
render other determinations elsewhere in our rules. For example, if
the Hybrid Trading System has not opened a series of a class because
there is no quote present that complies with the legal width
requirements or the opening price is not within an acceptable range,
the senior official in the control room may authorize the opening of
the affected series where necessary to ensure a fair and orderly
market. See paragraph (f) of Rule 6.2B, Hybrid Opening System
(``HOSS'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In connection with this rule change, the Exchange is proposing to
clarify that an obvious error rule action may be initiated by a member
through contacting either a Trading Official or designated personnel in
the control room.\5\ Currently the rule simply references Trading
Officials, which includes several of the Exchange staff in our control
room. Thus, for administrative convenience, we wish to clarify that
simply contacting Trading Officials or designated personnel in the
control room is sufficient to initiate action. Once either a Trading
Official or a control room designee is contacted, all reviews and
determinations shall continue to be rendered by the Trading Officials
except that, as proposed herein, actions to nullify an opening trade in
a restricted series shall be reviewed and determinations rendered by
the senior official in the control room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ We note that the procedures of other markets currently allow
for the initiation of an obvious error review by contacting
designated personnel in their respective control rooms. See, e.g.,
International Securities Exchange (``ISE'') Rule 720, Obvious and
Catastrophic Errors (which provides that ISE members who believe
they participated in a transaction that was an obvious error must
notify designated personnel in ISE's market control center to
initiate a review).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the Exchange is proposing to clarify in the text of Rule
5.4 that the restrictions on opening transactions contained in the
rule, as well as the related exceptions, apply to both opening
purchases and opening sales in restricted series. Currently, the rule
text indicates that the restrictions are applicable only to opening
purchase transactions; however, it is the Exchange's intention that the
restriction, and related exceptions, should also apply to opening
sales. Proposed changes to the rule text make this clear.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Act \6\ and the rules and regulations thereunder and, in
particular, the requirements of section 6(b) of the Act.\7\
Specifically, the Exchange believes the
[[Page 53062]]
proposed rule change is consistent with the section 6(b)(5) \8\
requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts, to remove impediments to and to perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed
rule change would help the Exchange more efficiently address scenarios
where an opening transaction that does not satisfy the requirements of
Rule 5.4 may occur inadvertently.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2008-90 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-90. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-90 and should be
submitted on or before September 29, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21164 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P