Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-Sheppard Act, 52973-52974 [E8-21142]
Download as PDF
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices
modern diesel submarines; and train
with the actual sensors and weapons
systems used in combat to mimic
realistic wartime conditions.
The Draft OEIS/EIS evaluates the
potential impacts of five alternatives for
USWTR including the No Action
Alternative. The alternatives were
evaluated in the Draft OEIS/EIS to
ensure they met the purpose and need,
giving due consideration to the
following: physiographic features (water
depth, range area length/width ratio,
shallow/deep water depth ratio, and
range orientation to the shoreline),
adequacy of support infrastructure
(shore landing site for trunk cable and
helicopter training and recovery
support), climatological criteria
(visibility, wind speeds, and wave
height), proximity to homeports/air
stations (helicopter, submarine, and
surface ship homeports), range
installation and use (commercial
fishing, ocean currents, and bottom
type), and non-critical support
infrastructure (air space control, shore
landing site, and proximity to docking
facility for range support craft).
These alternatives include: The No
Action Alternative, under which no
USWTR would be installed off the east
coast of the U.S., although ASW
training, including active sonar
activities, would continue across Navy
operating areas (OPAREAs) and adjacent
areas; Site A (Preferred Alternative)
which would be located offshore of
northeastern Florida in the Jacksonville
OPAREA; Site B, located offshore of
Charleston, South Carolina in the
Charleston OPAREA; Site C, located
offshore of southeastern North Carolina,
within the Cherry Point OPAREA; and
Site D, located offshore of the
northeastern coast of Virginia in the
VACAPES OPAREA. Two alternative
sites, Gulf of Mexico and Gulf of Maine,
were eliminated from further
consideration because of distance and
climatology.
The Draft OEIS/EIS analyzed potential
impacts on multiple resources
including, but not limited to: The
marine environment; biological
resources, including threatened and
endangered species; and socioeconomic
resources. No significant adverse
impacts were identified for any resource
area for any of the alternatives that
cannot be mitigated, with the exception
of exposure of marine mammals to
underwater sound.
The Navy has applied to NMFS under
the Marine Mammal Protection Act for
a Letter of Authorization and governing
regulations to authorize incidental takes
of marine mammals that may result
from operation of the proposed USWTR.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
The Navy is consulting with NMFS
under section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act on the potential for effects
on sea turtles from installation and
operation of the proposed range.
The USWTR Draft OEIS/EIS was
distributed to Federal, State, and local
agencies, elected officials, and other
interested individuals and organizations
on September 12, 2008. The public
comment period will end on October 27,
2008. Copies of the USWTR Draft OEIS/
EIS are available for public review at the
following libraries: Chincoteague Island
Library, 4077 Main Street,
Chincoteague, VA; Eastern Shore Public
Library, 23610 Front Street, Accomac,
VA; Virginia Beach Central Library,
4100 Virginia Beach Boulevard, Virginia
Beach, VA; Worcester County Library,
Ocean City Branch, 200 14th Street,
Ocean City, MD; Wicomico County Free
Library, 122 South Division Street,
Salisbury, MD; Carteret County Public
Library, 210 Turner Street, Beaufort, NC;
Onslow County Public Library, 58 Doris
Avenue East, Jacksonville, NC;
Charleston County Library, 68 Calhoun
Street, Charleston, SC; and Jacksonville
Public Library, Regency Square Branch,
9900 Regency Boulevard, Jacksonville,
FL.
The USWTR Draft OEIS/EIS is also
available for electronic public viewing
at https://projects.earthtech.com/uswtr/.
A paper copy of the Executive Summary
or a single CD with the USWTR Draft
OEIS/EIS will be made available upon
written request by contacting Naval
Facilities Engineering Command,
Atlantic Division; Attention: Code
EV22LL (USWTR OEIS/EIS PM); 6506
Hampton Blvd; Norfolk, VA 23508–
1278. Facsimile: 804–200–5568.
Federal, State, and local agencies and
interested parties are invited to be
present or represented at the public
hearing. Written comments can also be
submitted during the open house
sessions preceding the public hearings.
Oral statements will be heard and
transcribed by a stenographer; however,
to ensure the accuracy of the record, all
statements should be submitted in
writing. All statements, both oral and
written, will become part of the public
record on the Draft OEIS/EIS and will be
responded to in the Final OEIS/EIS.
Equal weight will be given to both oral
and written statements. In the interest of
available time, and to ensure all who
wish to give an oral statement have the
opportunity to do so, each speaker’s
comments will be limited to three (3)
minutes. If a long statement is to be
presented, it should be summarized at
the public hearing with the full text
submitted either in writing at the
hearing, or mailed or faxed to Naval
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52973
Facilities Engineering Command,
Atlantic Division; Attention: Code
EV22LL (USWTR OEIS/EIS PM); 6506
Hampton Blvd; Norfolk, VA 23508–
1278. Facsimile: 804–200–5568.
In addition, comments may be
submitted on-line at https://
projects.earthtech.com/uswtr/ during
the comment period. All written
comments must be postmarked by
October 27, 2008 to ensure they become
part of the official record. All comments
will be addressed in the Final OEIS/EIS.
Dated: September 5, 2008.
T. M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–21344 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Arbitration Panel Decision Under the
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Department of Education.
Notice of arbitration panel
decision under the Randolph-Sheppard
Act.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Education
(Department) gives notice that on
December 5, 2007, an arbitration panel
rendered a decision in the matter of
Hawaii Department of Human Services,
Vocational Rehabilitation and Services
for the Blind Division v. United States
Department of Defense, Department of
the Navy (Case No. R-S/06–4). This
panel was convened by the Department
under 20 U.S.C. 107d-1(b), after the
Department received a complaint filed
by the petitioner, the Hawaii
Department of Human Services,
Vocational Rehabilitation and Services
for the Blind Division.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may obtain a copy of the full text of the
arbitration panel decision from Suzette
E. Haynes, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 5022, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–2800.
Telephone: (202) 245–7374. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), you may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Under
section 6(c) of the Randolph-Sheppard
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
52974
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Act (the act), 20 U.S.C. 107d–2(c), the
Secretary publishes in the Federal
Register a synopsis of each arbitration
panel decision affecting the
administration of vending facilities on
Federal and other property.
Background
The Hawaii Department of Human
Services, Vocational Rehabilitation and
Services for the Blind Division, the State
Licensing Agency (SLA) alleged
violations by the United States
Department of Defense, Department of
the Navy (Navy) of the Act, and the
implementing regulations in 34 CFR
part 395. Specifically, the SLA alleged
the Navy improperly denied the SLA’s
request to establish a RandolphSheppard vending facility at three
parcels of real property located at the
Pearl Harbor Naval Base. The Navy
owned the parcels but leased them to
private entities as described in this
notice.
In 1999, Congress gave the Navy
authority to lease or convey real and
personal property in Hawaii that was
not needed for Navy operations. On
June 30, 2003, the Navy entered into a
lease with Fluor Hawaii, LLC, which
was terminated in April 2007, covering
an area of property at Pearl Harbor
immediately adjacent to the USS
Arizona Memorial Visitor Center that is
known as Halawa Landing. The lease
granted exclusive use and possession of
the property for a term of 65 years and
provided that the property be used
solely for a support facility for visitor
attractions.
In November 2004, the lessee entered
into an agreement with the Pearl Harbor
Visitor Center (PHVC) providing for the
provision of visitors services at Halawa
Landing including but not limited to
food, beverage, bag storage, and visitor
information. Between late 2004 and
early 2007, PHVC operated several food
concessions and other visitor services in
a large white tent constructed on a
portion of the Halawa Landing property
adjacent to the primary parking lot used
by visitors. A blind vendor operated a
food stand at the entrance to that
complex pursuant to a concession
granted by the National Park Service.
In June 2003, the Navy entered into a
lease with a private party for Ford
Island, which covered certain Pearl
Harbor property on which old and
underutilized airplane hangars stood. In
2006, the lessee subleased a portion of
the area to the Pacific Aviation Museum
(PAM) at Pearl Harbor. The PAM
included a cafe, which sold a variety of
food and beverages.
On July 7, 1986, the Navy leased
certain property near Halawa Landing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
for the sole purpose of establishing a
museum. Inside the museum, known as
the USS Bowfin Museum, was a hot dog
cart where, in addition to hot dogs,
sandwiches, snacks, beverages, and ice
cream, some nonfood items were sold.
The SLA alleged that the three parcels
of real property at the Pearl Harbor
Naval base leased by Navy to a private
entity were in violation of the Act that
authorizes blind persons to operate
vending facilities on any Federal
property. Navy responded that the Act
did not apply to leased property. After
several informal attempts to resolve this
dispute, the SLA filed for Federal
arbitration in February 2006. A hearing
on this matter was held on July 25,
2007.
The issues heard by the arbitration
panel were: whether the act applies to
real property owned by Navy if leased
to a private entity and whether an
arbitration panel convened under the
Act can award monetary damages.
Arbitration Panel Decision
After reviewing all of the records and
hearing testimony of witnesses, the
panel ruled for the Navy. While finding
the Act ambiguous with regard to
whether the priority provisions of the
Act at 20 U.S.C. 107(b) applies to
Federally owned property that has been
leased to a private entity, the panel
concluded, based on legislative history
as well as the text of the Act and its
implementing regulations, that the
priority applies only on property
‘‘controlled, maintained, or operated by
Federal agencies.’’
Specifically, the panel majority found
that Congress had authorized the
Secretary of the Navy to sell or lease any
property in excess of the needs of the
Navy. The Navy entered into lease
agreements granting exclusive use and
possession of the leased properties.
With respect to the USS Bowfin
Museum, the arbitration panel
determined that, because no cafe or
cafeteria was planned for the museum,
the SLA’s claims regarding the museum
were moot. With respect to the Halawa
Landing and PAM properties, the
majority concluded that the priority did
not apply because the Navy did not
control the leased properties.
Furthermore, the panel concluded
that the satisfactory site provisions of
the Act did not apply because no
Federal employees used the properties
and there was not any Federal office
space located there. Based upon the
foregoing, the panel ruled that the Act’s
priority did not apply to these
properties leased by the Navy.
Lastly, although stating that the
concession area in the white tent at
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Halawa Landing apparently damaged
the blind vendor financially, the panel
concluded that the Act does not prohibit
competition except in instances where
vending machines are in direct
competition with a blind vendor’s
facility, which did not occur here. In
addition, the panel concluded that the
SLA would not be entitled to damages
even if the Navy violated the Act
because the Act does not authorize the
panel to make damages awards. One
panel member concurred with the
majority opinion and one panel member
dissented.
The views and opinions expressed by
the panel do not necessarily represent
the views and opinions of the
Department.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register , in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: September 8, 2009.
Tracy R. Justesen,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E8–21142 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 12569–001]
Public Utility District No. 1 of
Okanogan County; Notice of
Application Tendered for Filing With
the Commission
September 5, 2008.
Take notice that the following
hydroelectric application has been filed
with the Commission and is available
for public inspection.
a. Type of Application: Major License.
b. Project No.: P–12569–001.
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52973-52974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21142]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Arbitration Panel Decision Under the Randolph-Sheppard Act
AGENCY: Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of arbitration panel decision under the Randolph-
Sheppard Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) gives notice that on
December 5, 2007, an arbitration panel rendered a decision in the
matter of Hawaii Department of Human Services, Vocational
Rehabilitation and Services for the Blind Division v. United States
Department of Defense, Department of the Navy (Case No. R-S/06-4). This
panel was convened by the Department under 20 U.S.C. 107d-1(b), after
the Department received a complaint filed by the petitioner, the Hawaii
Department of Human Services, Vocational Rehabilitation and Services
for the Blind Division.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may obtain a copy of the full text
of the arbitration panel decision from Suzette E. Haynes, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 5022, Potomac
Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-2800. Telephone: (202) 245-7374. If
you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 6(c) of the Randolph-Sheppard
[[Page 52974]]
Act (the act), 20 U.S.C. 107d-2(c), the Secretary publishes in the
Federal Register a synopsis of each arbitration panel decision
affecting the administration of vending facilities on Federal and other
property.
Background
The Hawaii Department of Human Services, Vocational Rehabilitation
and Services for the Blind Division, the State Licensing Agency (SLA)
alleged violations by the United States Department of Defense,
Department of the Navy (Navy) of the Act, and the implementing
regulations in 34 CFR part 395. Specifically, the SLA alleged the Navy
improperly denied the SLA's request to establish a Randolph-Sheppard
vending facility at three parcels of real property located at the Pearl
Harbor Naval Base. The Navy owned the parcels but leased them to
private entities as described in this notice.
In 1999, Congress gave the Navy authority to lease or convey real
and personal property in Hawaii that was not needed for Navy
operations. On June 30, 2003, the Navy entered into a lease with Fluor
Hawaii, LLC, which was terminated in April 2007, covering an area of
property at Pearl Harbor immediately adjacent to the USS Arizona
Memorial Visitor Center that is known as Halawa Landing. The lease
granted exclusive use and possession of the property for a term of 65
years and provided that the property be used solely for a support
facility for visitor attractions.
In November 2004, the lessee entered into an agreement with the
Pearl Harbor Visitor Center (PHVC) providing for the provision of
visitors services at Halawa Landing including but not limited to food,
beverage, bag storage, and visitor information. Between late 2004 and
early 2007, PHVC operated several food concessions and other visitor
services in a large white tent constructed on a portion of the Halawa
Landing property adjacent to the primary parking lot used by visitors.
A blind vendor operated a food stand at the entrance to that complex
pursuant to a concession granted by the National Park Service.
In June 2003, the Navy entered into a lease with a private party
for Ford Island, which covered certain Pearl Harbor property on which
old and underutilized airplane hangars stood. In 2006, the lessee
subleased a portion of the area to the Pacific Aviation Museum (PAM) at
Pearl Harbor. The PAM included a cafe, which sold a variety of food and
beverages.
On July 7, 1986, the Navy leased certain property near Halawa
Landing for the sole purpose of establishing a museum. Inside the
museum, known as the USS Bowfin Museum, was a hot dog cart where, in
addition to hot dogs, sandwiches, snacks, beverages, and ice cream,
some nonfood items were sold.
The SLA alleged that the three parcels of real property at the
Pearl Harbor Naval base leased by Navy to a private entity were in
violation of the Act that authorizes blind persons to operate vending
facilities on any Federal property. Navy responded that the Act did not
apply to leased property. After several informal attempts to resolve
this dispute, the SLA filed for Federal arbitration in February 2006. A
hearing on this matter was held on July 25, 2007.
The issues heard by the arbitration panel were: whether the act
applies to real property owned by Navy if leased to a private entity
and whether an arbitration panel convened under the Act can award
monetary damages.
Arbitration Panel Decision
After reviewing all of the records and hearing testimony of
witnesses, the panel ruled for the Navy. While finding the Act
ambiguous with regard to whether the priority provisions of the Act at
20 U.S.C. 107(b) applies to Federally owned property that has been
leased to a private entity, the panel concluded, based on legislative
history as well as the text of the Act and its implementing
regulations, that the priority applies only on property ``controlled,
maintained, or operated by Federal agencies.''
Specifically, the panel majority found that Congress had authorized
the Secretary of the Navy to sell or lease any property in excess of
the needs of the Navy. The Navy entered into lease agreements granting
exclusive use and possession of the leased properties. With respect to
the USS Bowfin Museum, the arbitration panel determined that, because
no cafe or cafeteria was planned for the museum, the SLA's claims
regarding the museum were moot. With respect to the Halawa Landing and
PAM properties, the majority concluded that the priority did not apply
because the Navy did not control the leased properties.
Furthermore, the panel concluded that the satisfactory site
provisions of the Act did not apply because no Federal employees used
the properties and there was not any Federal office space located
there. Based upon the foregoing, the panel ruled that the Act's
priority did not apply to these properties leased by the Navy.
Lastly, although stating that the concession area in the white tent
at Halawa Landing apparently damaged the blind vendor financially, the
panel concluded that the Act does not prohibit competition except in
instances where vending machines are in direct competition with a blind
vendor's facility, which did not occur here. In addition, the panel
concluded that the SLA would not be entitled to damages even if the
Navy violated the Act because the Act does not authorize the panel to
make damages awards. One panel member concurred with the majority
opinion and one panel member dissented.
The views and opinions expressed by the panel do not necessarily
represent the views and opinions of the Department.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register , in text or
Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following
site: https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
Dated: September 8, 2009.
Tracy R. Justesen,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.1
[FR Doc. E8-21142 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P