Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 52848-52849 [E8-21230]
Download as PDF
52848
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 177 / Thursday, September 11, 2008 / Notices
rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
CFR 350.54 and are listed in the
application package.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section in this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section in
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as specified by
the Secretary in 34 CFR 75.118. The
Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34
CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: To evaluate
the overall success of its research
program, NIDRR assesses the quality of
its funded projects through review of
grantee performance and products. Each
year, NIDRR examines, through expert
review, a portion of its grantees to
determine:
• The percentage of NIDRR-supported
fellows, post-doctoral trainees, and
doctoral students who publish results of
NIDRR-sponsored research in refereed
journals.
• The average number of publications
per award based on NIDRR-funded
research and development activities in
refereed journals.
• The percentage of grantee research
and development that has appropriate
study design, meets rigorous standards
of scientific and/or engineering
methods, and builds on and contributes
to knowledge in the field.
• The percentage of new grants that
include studies funded by NIDRR that
assess the effectiveness of interventions,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:21 Sep 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
programs, and devices using rigorous
and appropriate methods.
NIDRR uses information submitted by
grantees as part of their Annual
Performance Reports (APRs) for these
reviews. NIDRR also determines, using
information submitted as part of the
APR, the number of publications in
refereed journals that are based on
NIDRR-funded research and
development activities.
Department of Education program
performance reports, which include
information on NIDRR programs, are
available on the Department’s Web site:
https://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/
opepd/sas/.
Updates on the Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993
(GPRA) indicators, revisions and
methods appear on the NIDRR Program
Review Web site: https://
www.neweditions.net/pr/commonfiles/
pmconcepts.htm.
Grantees should consult these sites,
on a regular basis, to obtain details and
explanations on how NIDRR programs
contribute to the advancement of the
Department’s long-term and annual
performance goals.
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlene Spencer, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 6026, PCP, Washington, DC
20202. Telephone: (202) 245–7532 or by
e-mail: marlene.spencer@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the Federal
Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–
877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Alternative Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
by contacting the Grants and Contracts
Services Team, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 5075, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2550. Telephone: (202) 245–
7363. If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Dated: September 8, 2008.
Tracy R. Justesen,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. E8–21139 Filed 9–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official,
Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites
comments on the submission for OMB
review as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before October
14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Education Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10222,
Washington, DC 20503. Commenters are
encouraged to submit responses
electronically by e-mail to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or via fax
to (202) 395–6974. Commenters should
include the following subject line in
their response ‘‘Comment: [insert OMB
number], [insert abbreviated collection
name, e.g., ‘‘Upward Bound
Evaluation’’]. Persons submitting
comments electronically should not
submit paper copies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) provide interested
Federal agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The IC Clearance
Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 177 / Thursday, September 11, 2008 / Notices
should be electronically mailed to
WASHINGTONICDocketMgr@ed.gov
202–401–1097. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–
8339.
52849
Dated: September 8, 2008.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information
Management Services, Office of Management.
AGENCY:
Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education
SUMMARY: The Department of Education
(Department) gives notice that on April
7, 2008, an arbitration panel rendered a
decision in the matter of David
Zelickson v. California Department of
Rehabilitation, Case no. R–S/06–10).
This panel was convened by the
Department under 20 U.S.C. 107d–1(a),
after the Department received a
complaint filed by the petitioner, David
Zelickson.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may obtain a copy of the full text of the
arbitration panel decision from Suzette
E. Haynes, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
Room 5022, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–2800.
Telephone: (202) 245–7374. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), you may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 6(c) of the Randolph-Sheppard
Act (the act), 20 U.S.C. 107d–2(c), the
Secretary publishes in the Federal
Register a synopsis of each arbitration
panel decision affecting the
administration of vending facilities on
Federal and other property.
California Department of Education v.
General Services Administration, Case
no. R–S/99–1. The aforementioned
grievance was a complaint filed by the
SLA regarding management of a vending
facility at the Roybal Federal Building
(Roybal) in Los Angeles, California
where complainant was assigned as the
licensed blind vendor.
Specifically, complainant received a
permit from the SLA to operate the
Roybal building in 1993. The permit
was renewed in 1996. In November
1997, the General Services
Administration (GSA) requested the
removal of complainant from the Roybal
building indicating its right to do so
because of a change in the nature of the
food service provided at the vending
facility.
The SLA requested the Secretary of
Education to convene a federal
arbitration panel to hear this matter. A
panel was convened. On December 26,
2000, the panel found that GSA was in
violation of the act concerning the
removal of complainant from the Roybal
building. In the decision and award, the
panel ruled that complainant should be
reinstated to the Roybal building and
that GSA was obligated to make both the
complainant and the SLA whole for
their economic losses. GSA did not
contest the award that was final and
binding.
For six years, the SLA attempted to
secure voluntary compliance by GSA
with the December 2000 decision and
award. GSA refused until March 2006 to
allow complainant to return to the
Roybal building. GSA claiming
sovereign immunity, also maintained
that it never agreed to compensate
complainant for his economic losses.
Shortly after March 2006,
complainant filed a request for Federal
arbitration with the secretary of
Education regarding this matter. A
Federal arbitration panel heard this case
on August 10, 2007.
According to the arbitration panel, the
issues to be resolved were as follows: (1)
To what extent, if any was the SLA
obligated to enforce the 2000 arbitration
decision and award; (2) did the SLA
meet its obligation to complainant; and
(3) if not, what was the appropriate
remedy.
Background
Mr. David Zelickson (complainant)
alleged violations by the California
Department of Rehabilitation, the state
licensing agency (SLA) of the RandolphSheppard Act (Act), and the
implementing regulations in 34 CFR
part 395. Complainant alleged that the
SLA failed to enforce the arbitration
panel decision and award in the case of
Arbitration Panel Decision
After reviewing all of the records and
hearing testimony of witnesses, the
panel majority found that the SLA was
obligated to enforce the 2000 arbitration
decision and award and failed to meet
its obligation to the complainant by not
suing for enforcement of the arbitration
decision and award. As discussed by the
panel, a lawsuit is the only way an SLA
rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
Management, publishes that notice
containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection,
grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested,
e.g., new, revision, extension, existing
or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary
of the collection; (4) Description of the
need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and
frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping
burden. OMB invites public comment.
Type of Review: New Collection.
Title: Leveraging Educational
Technology to Keep America
Competitive: National Teacher
Technology Study.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Individuals or
household.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 2300.
Burden Hours: 750.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is
to invesigate the technology experiences
included in pre-service teacher
preparation programs, as well as how
teachers use technology in the
classroom. A three-phase grounded
theory research design employs (1)
educational technology faculty and
general induction teacher surveys, (2)
educational technology faculty and
accomplished technology-using teacher
phone interviews, and (3) case studies
of teacher education programs and
accomplished technology-using
teachers.
Requests for copies of the information
collection submission for OMB review
may be accessed from https://
edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the
‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and
by clicking on link number. When you
access the information collection, click
on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to view.
Written requests for information should
be addressed to U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed
to 202–401–0920. Please specify the
complete title of the information
collection when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:21 Sep 10, 2008
Jkt 214001
[FR Doc. E8–21230 Filed 9–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Arbitration Panel Decision Under the
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Department of Education.
Notice of arbitration panel
decision under the Randolph-Sheppard
Act.
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11SEN1.SGM
11SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 177 (Thursday, September 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52848-52849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21230]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: Department of Education.
SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management
Services, Office of Management invites comments on the submission for
OMB review as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
October 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention: Education Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10222,
Washington, DC 20503. Commenters are encouraged to submit responses
electronically by e-mail to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or via fax to
(202) 395-6974. Commenters should include the following subject line in
their response ``Comment: [insert OMB number], [insert abbreviated
collection name, e.g., ``Upward Bound Evaluation'']. Persons submitting
comments electronically should not submit paper copies.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an
early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB
may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the
extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat
the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal
law, or substantially interfere with any agency's ability to perform
its statutory obligations. The IC Clearance Official, Regulatory
Information Management Services, Office of
[[Page 52849]]
Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection, grouped by office, contains the
following: (1) Type of review requested, e.g., new, revision,
extension, existing or reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of the
collection; (4) Description of the need for, and proposed use of, the
information; (5) Respondents and frequency of collection; and (6)
Reporting and/or Recordkeeping burden. OMB invites public comment.
Dated: September 8, 2008.
Angela C. Arrington,
IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services,
Office of Management.
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education
Type of Review: New Collection.
Title: Leveraging Educational Technology to Keep America
Competitive: National Teacher Technology Study.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Individuals or household.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour Burden:
Responses: 2300.
Burden Hours: 750.
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to invesigate the technology
experiences included in pre-service teacher preparation programs, as
well as how teachers use technology in the classroom. A three-phase
grounded theory research design employs (1) educational technology
faculty and general induction teacher surveys, (2) educational
technology faculty and accomplished technology-using teacher phone
interviews, and (3) case studies of teacher education programs and
accomplished technology-using teachers.
Requests for copies of the information collection submission for
OMB review may be accessed from https://edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting
the ``Browse Pending Collections'' link and by clicking on link number.
When you access the information collection, click on ``Download
Attachments'' to view. Written requests for information should be
addressed to U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
LBJ, Washington, DC 20202-4537. Requests may also be electronically
mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed to 202-401-0920. Please specify
the complete title of the information collection when making your
request.
Comments regarding burden and/or the collection activity
requirements should be electronically mailed to
WASHINGTONICDocketMgr@ed.gov 202-401-1097. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
[FR Doc. E8-21230 Filed 9-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P