Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Price Improvement Mechanism, 50663-50664 [E8-19821]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 27, 2008 / Notices
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–19822 Filed 8–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58401; File No. SR–ISE–
2008–63]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the Price
Improvement Mechanism
August 21, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 31,
2008, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify its
Price Improvement Mechanism (PIM)
auction eligibility requirements to
eliminate the requirement that there be
at least three market makers quoting the
relevant series. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.ise.com), at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II.Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:52 Aug 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
In order to provide additional
opportunities for price improvement,
the Exchange proposes to expand the
PIM auction process. The Exchange’s
PIM permits Electronic Access Members
(‘‘EAMs’’) to provide penny price
improvement for agency orders.3 ISE’s
current rules require, among other
things, that an EAM enter an order into
the PIM only when there are at least
three market makers quoting in the
options series. The Exchange is now
proposing to eliminate this requirement.
The Exchange does not believe that
orders should be denied the benefits of
the PIM auction simply because there
may be less than three ISE market
makers quoting in a particular series.
The Exchange believes this is a
reasonable modification designed to
provide additional flexibility for
members to obtain executions on behalf
of their customers while continuing to
provide a meaningful, competitive
auction.
In support of its proposal, the
Exchange notes the ISE and other
options exchanges already have
provisions within their rules that permit
price improvement in non-standard
increments without a condition that
there be a minimum number of market
makers quoting in the particular series.
For example, ISE has electronic auction
mechanisms for crossing agency order
with facilitation or solicited orders
(referred to as the ‘‘Facilitation
Mechanism’’ and ‘‘Solicited Order
Mechanism’’) in ‘‘split price’’
increments (e.g., $1.025, $1.05 and
$1.075 for series trading in $0.05
increments. The Facilitation and
Solicited Order Mechanisms do not
require that there be any minimum
number of ISE market makers quoting in
the particular series.4 Further, the
Chicago Board Options Exchange
(‘‘CBOE’’) has an electronic auction
mechanism for crossing agency orders
for 500 contracts or more with solicited
orders (referred to as the ‘‘Solicitation
Auction Mechanism’’) in increments as
small as $0.01. This CBOE Solicitation
Auction Mechanism does not require
3 A crossing transaction consists of an order the
EAM represents as agent and a counter-side order.
The counter-side order may represent interest for
the EAM’s own account or interest the EAM may
have solicited from one or more parties, or both.
4 See ISE Rule 716.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50663
that there be any minimum number of
CBOE market makers quoting in the
particular series.5 Finally, the NASDAQ
Options Market (‘‘NOM’’) has a
procedure that permits a member who
enters an agency order in penny
increments (which is then rounded and
displayed at the standard increment
price) to enter a contra-side order in
penny increments after the agency order
has been exposed at the rounded price
for three seconds. This NOM crossing
procedure does not require that there be
any minimum number of NOM market
makers quoting in the particular series.6
Because these other mechanisms are
currently able to offer price
improvement in a non-standard
increment without a minimum quoter
requirement, the Exchange believes it is
essential for competitive reasons to be
able to offer the same opportunities for
price improvement on ISE through the
PIM.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act 7 in general and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act 8 in particular in that it is designed
5 See
CBOE Rule 6.74B.
using the NOM crossing procedure to
achieve an execution in penny increments, there is
no requirement that there be any NOM market
makers quoting the particular series or that they
even be aware that the initiating NOM member is
attempting to cross an order in an undisplayed
penny increment. For example, a NOM member
could enter an agency limit order to buy at $1.03
that is rounded and displayed at $1.00, wait three
seconds, then enter a principal or solicited order to
sell at $1.03. Although the initiating member knows
it has entered an agency order to buy at $1.03, other
market participants would only see the size of the
agency order displayed on the bid at $1.00. See
NOM Chapter IV, Section 5, Chapter VI, Sections
7(b) and 10, and Chapter VII, Sections 6 and 12. The
Exchange understands that NOM’s method of
crossing orders in non-standard increments differs
from ISE’s PIM in so much as PIM will allocate the
initiating Member a certain minimum participation
entitlement if certain conditions are met (e.g., after
public customer orders, 40% of the order is
allocated to the initiating Member if its single-price
submission equals the best price), whereas NOM
does not have any such participation entitlement.
However, the Exchange does not believe this
distinction is dispositive to our proposal to
eliminate the requirement that there be a minimum
number of quoters for a PIM auction. In this regard,
we note that participation entitlements already
apply to the ISE Facilitation and Solicited Order
Mechanisms and the CBOE Solicitation Auction
Mechanism. See ISE Rule 716 and CBOE Rule
6.74B. The Exchange also notes that an Agency
Order displayed through ISE’s PIM process will
receive the benefit of any price improvement
received during the auction, whereas an agency
order displayed on NOM generally will not get any
price improvement beyond its limit price (using the
example above, once displayed at the rounded price
the agency order to buy will generally only execute
at $1.03, not better).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
6 When
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
50664
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 27, 2008 / Notices
to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. In particular, the
proposed rule change will allow
members to guarantee executions and
provide additional price improvement
opportunities to their customer’s orders.
The Exchange believes this is a
reasonable modification designed to
provide additional flexibility for
members to obtain executions on behalf
of their customers while continuing to
provide a meaningful, competitive
auction.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission will:
(A) by order approve such proposed
rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:52 Aug 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
Electronic Comments
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISE–2008–63 on the subject
line.
[Disaster Declaration #11264 and #11265]
Iowa Disaster Number IA–00015
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Amendment 12.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Iowa (FEMA–
• Send paper comments in triplicate
1763–DR), dated 05/27/2008.
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes,
Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, and Flooding.
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Incident Period: 05/25/2008 and
continuing through 08/13/2008.
All submissions should refer to File
Effective Date: 08/13/2008.
Number SR–ISE–2008–63. This file
Physical Loan Application Deadline
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Date: 09/29/2008.
EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:
Commission process and review your
02/27/2009.
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
post all comments on the Commission’s applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
submission, all subsequent
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
amendments, all written statements
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
with respect to the proposed rule
U.S. Small Business Administration,
change that are filed with the
409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050,
Commission, and all written
Washington, DC 20416.
communications relating to the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than of the President’s major disaster
declaration for the State of Iowa, dated
those that may be withheld from the
05/27/2008 is hereby amended to
public in accordance with the
establish the incident period for this
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
disaster as beginning 05/25/2008 and
available for inspection and copying in
continuing through 08/13/2008.
the Commission’s Public Reference
All other information in the original
Room on official business days between
declaration remains unchanged.
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
of such filing also will be available for
Numbers 59002 and 59008)
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the ISE. All comments received Herbert L. Mitchell,
will be posted without change; the
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
Commission does not edit personal
[FR Doc. E8–19868 Filed 8–26–08; 8:45 am]
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2008–63 and should be submitted on or [Disaster Declaration #11370]
before September 17, 2008.
New Hampshire Disaster #NH–00006
For the Commission, by the Division of
Paper Comments
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–19821 Filed 8–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
9 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is a notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for Public Assistance Only for
the State of New Hampshire (FEMA–
1782–DR), dated 08/11/2008.
Incident: Severe Storms, Tornado, and
Flooding.
Incident Period: 07/24/2008.
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50663-50664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19821]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-58401; File No. SR-ISE-2008-63]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Price
Improvement Mechanism
August 21, 2008.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 31, 2008, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify its Price Improvement Mechanism
(PIM) auction eligibility requirements to eliminate the requirement
that there be at least three market makers quoting the relevant series.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (https://www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II.Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
In order to provide additional opportunities for price improvement,
the Exchange proposes to expand the PIM auction process. The Exchange's
PIM permits Electronic Access Members (``EAMs'') to provide penny price
improvement for agency orders.\3\ ISE's current rules require, among
other things, that an EAM enter an order into the PIM only when there
are at least three market makers quoting in the options series. The
Exchange is now proposing to eliminate this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A crossing transaction consists of an order the EAM
represents as agent and a counter-side order. The counter-side order
may represent interest for the EAM's own account or interest the EAM
may have solicited from one or more parties, or both.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange does not believe that orders should be denied the
benefits of the PIM auction simply because there may be less than three
ISE market makers quoting in a particular series. The Exchange believes
this is a reasonable modification designed to provide additional
flexibility for members to obtain executions on behalf of their
customers while continuing to provide a meaningful, competitive
auction.
In support of its proposal, the Exchange notes the ISE and other
options exchanges already have provisions within their rules that
permit price improvement in non-standard increments without a condition
that there be a minimum number of market makers quoting in the
particular series. For example, ISE has electronic auction mechanisms
for crossing agency order with facilitation or solicited orders
(referred to as the ``Facilitation Mechanism'' and ``Solicited Order
Mechanism'') in ``split price'' increments (e.g., $1.025, $1.05 and
$1.075 for series trading in $0.05 increments. The Facilitation and
Solicited Order Mechanisms do not require that there be any minimum
number of ISE market makers quoting in the particular series.\4\
Further, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'') has an
electronic auction mechanism for crossing agency orders for 500
contracts or more with solicited orders (referred to as the
``Solicitation Auction Mechanism'') in increments as small as $0.01.
This CBOE Solicitation Auction Mechanism does not require that there be
any minimum number of CBOE market makers quoting in the particular
series.\5\ Finally, the NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM'') has a procedure
that permits a member who enters an agency order in penny increments
(which is then rounded and displayed at the standard increment price)
to enter a contra-side order in penny increments after the agency order
has been exposed at the rounded price for three seconds. This NOM
crossing procedure does not require that there be any minimum number of
NOM market makers quoting in the particular series.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See ISE Rule 716.
\5\ See CBOE Rule 6.74B.
\6\ When using the NOM crossing procedure to achieve an
execution in penny increments, there is no requirement that there be
any NOM market makers quoting the particular series or that they
even be aware that the initiating NOM member is attempting to cross
an order in an undisplayed penny increment. For example, a NOM
member could enter an agency limit order to buy at $1.03 that is
rounded and displayed at $1.00, wait three seconds, then enter a
principal or solicited order to sell at $1.03. Although the
initiating member knows it has entered an agency order to buy at
$1.03, other market participants would only see the size of the
agency order displayed on the bid at $1.00. See NOM Chapter IV,
Section 5, Chapter VI, Sections 7(b) and 10, and Chapter VII,
Sections 6 and 12. The Exchange understands that NOM's method of
crossing orders in non-standard increments differs from ISE's PIM in
so much as PIM will allocate the initiating Member a certain minimum
participation entitlement if certain conditions are met (e.g., after
public customer orders, 40% of the order is allocated to the
initiating Member if its single-price submission equals the best
price), whereas NOM does not have any such participation
entitlement. However, the Exchange does not believe this distinction
is dispositive to our proposal to eliminate the requirement that
there be a minimum number of quoters for a PIM auction. In this
regard, we note that participation entitlements already apply to the
ISE Facilitation and Solicited Order Mechanisms and the CBOE
Solicitation Auction Mechanism. See ISE Rule 716 and CBOE Rule
6.74B. The Exchange also notes that an Agency Order displayed
through ISE's PIM process will receive the benefit of any price
improvement received during the auction, whereas an agency order
displayed on NOM generally will not get any price improvement beyond
its limit price (using the example above, once displayed at the
rounded price the agency order to buy will generally only execute at
$1.03, not better).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because these other mechanisms are currently able to offer price
improvement in a non-standard increment without a minimum quoter
requirement, the Exchange believes it is essential for competitive
reasons to be able to offer the same opportunities for price
improvement on ISE through the PIM.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act \7\ in general and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \8\ in particular in that it is designed
[[Page 50664]]
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. In particular, the proposed rule change will allow members to
guarantee executions and provide additional price improvement
opportunities to their customer's orders. The Exchange believes this is
a reasonable modification designed to provide additional flexibility
for members to obtain executions on behalf of their customers while
continuing to provide a meaningful, competitive auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
(A) by order approve such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2008-63 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2008-63. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of
the ISE. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-
2008-63 and should be submitted on or before September 17, 2008.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E8-19821 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P