Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 49691-49693 [E8-19484]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 164 / Friday, August 22, 2008 / Notices
gliomas, lung, breast or prostate cancers
but not in serum from controls.
The correlation between cancer and
BORIS expression indicates that
detection of aberrantly expressed BORIS
and/or anti-BORIS antibodies could
serve as a method of screening or
diagnosing cancer. In patients already
known to have cancer, expression of
BORIS could be monitored to measure
a patient’s response to a particular
therapeutic regimen.
The prospective exclusive license will
be royalty-bearing and will comply with
the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C.
209 and 37 CFR Part 404.7. The
prospective exclusive license may be
granted unless within sixty (60) days
from the date of this published notice,
the NIH receives written evidence and
argument that establish that the grant of
the license would not be consistent with
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and
37 CFR Part 404.7.
Applications for a license in the field
of use filed in response to this notice
will be treated as objections to the grant
of the contemplated exclusive license.
Comments and objections submitted to
this notice will not be made available
for public inspection and, to the extent
permitted by law, will not be released
under the Freedom of Information Act,
5 U.S.C. 552.
which has offices in Vancouver, Canada.
This patent has been assigned to the
Government of the United States of
America. There are no foreign patents or
patent applications associated with this
technology. There are no other U.S.
Patents or Patent Applications
associated with this technology.
The prospective exclusive license
territory may be worldwide, and the
field of use maybe limited to the
development and sale of antibody
conjugated toxins targeting the nicotinic
acetylcholine receptors for therapeutic
treatment of focal muscle spasms, as
claimed in the Licensed Patent Rights.
DATES: Only written comments and/or
applications for a license which are
received by the NIH Office of
Technology Transfer on or before
October 21, 2008 will be considered.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copy of the
patent, inquiries, comments, and other
materials relating to the contemplated
exclusive license should be directed to:
Betty B. Tong, PhD, Technology
Licensing Specialist, Office of
Technology Transfer, National Institutes
of Health, 6011 Executive Boulevard,
Suite 325, Rockville, MD 20852–3804;
Telephone: (301) 594–6565; Facsimile:
(301) 402–0220; E-mail:
tongb@mail.nih.gov.
Dated: August 14, 2008.
Richard U. Rodriguez,
Director, Division of Technology Development
and Transfer, Office of Technology Transfer,
National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E8–19454 Filed 8–21–08; 8:45 am]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Prospective Grant of Exclusive
License: The Development of
Inmunotoxins as Therapeutics for
Focal Muscle Spasms
National Institutes of Health,
Public Health Service, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is notice, in accordance
with 35 U.S.C. 209(c)(l) and 37 CFR part
404.7(a)(l)(i), that the National Institutes
of Health, Department of Health and
Human Services, is contemplating the
grant of an exclusive patent license to
practice the invention embodied in
issued U.S. Patent 6,780,413 entitled
‘‘Immunotoxin (MAB–Ricin) for the
Treatment of Focal Movement
Disorders’’ [HHS Ref. E–132–1996/0–
US–04] to Aphrodite Therapeutics, Inc.,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Aug 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
The
invention describes immunotoxins and
methods of using the immunotoxins for
the treatment of focal muscle spasms. A
specific immunotoxin covered by this
technology is MAB–Ricin. The
immunotoxins are targeted via an
antibody that is specific to acetylcholine
receptors present in large numbers on
the muscle side of the neuromuscular
junction, allowing the specific
destruction of muscle cells.
The prospective exclusive license will
be royalty bearing and will comply with
the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C.
209 and 37 CFR part 404.7. The
prospective exclusive license may be
granted unless within sixty (60) days
from the date of this published notice,
the NIH receives written evidence and
argument that establishes that the grant
of the license would not be consistent
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209
and 37 CFR part 404.7.
Applications for a license in the field
of use filed in response to this notice
will be treated as objections to the grant
of the contemplated exclusive license.
Comments and objections submitted to
this notice will not be made available
for public inspection and, to the extent
permitted by law, will not be released
under the Freedom of Information Act,
5 U.S.C. 552.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49691
Dated: August 14, 2008.
Richard U. Rodriguez,
Director, Division of Technology Development
and Transfer, Office of Technology Transfer,
National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E8–19463 Filed 8–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Strategic Prevention
Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF
SIG) Program (OMB No. 0930–0279)
Revision
SAMHSA’s Center for Substance
Abuse Prevention (CSAP) is responsible
for the evaluation instruments of the
Strategic Prevention Framework State
Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) Program. The
program is a major national initiative
designed to: (1) Prevent the onset and
reduce the progression of substance
abuse, including childhood and
underage drinking; (2) reduce substance
abuse related problems in communities;
and, (3) build prevention capacity and
infrastructure at the State/territory/Tribe
and community levels.
Five steps comprise the SPF:
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
49692
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 164 / Friday, August 22, 2008 / Notices
Step 1: Profile population needs,
resources, and readiness to address
needs and gaps.
Step 2: Mobilize and/or build capacity
to address needs.
Step 3: Develop a comprehensive
strategic plan.
Step 4: Implement evidence-based
prevention programs, policies, and
practices.
Step 5: Monitor, evaluate, sustain, and
improve or replace those that fail.
An evaluation team is currently
implementing a multi-method, quasiexperimental evaluation of the first two
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) approved SPF SIG cohorts
receiving their first year grant awards in
FY 2004 and FY 2005. This is known as
the Cohort 1 and 2 Cross-Site Evaluation
Study, OMB–0930–0279. This 60-Day
Notice invites comment on granteelevel, community-level, and participantlevel data collection instruments
designed for the cross-site evaluation of
16 Cohort 3 grantees receiving grants in
FY 2006 and a yet-undetermined
number of Cohort 4 grantees to be
funded in the near future. Since the
ultimate goal is to fund all eligible
jurisdictions, there are no control
groups at the grantee level. The purpose
of cross-site evaluation is to measure the
impact of community-funded grantees
versus non-funded communities on
SAMHSA’s NOMs.
Data collected at the grantee,
community, and participant levels using
the three instruments will be combined
in an analysis that investigates the
relationship, if any, between the SPF
process and substance use outcomes at
individual and community levels. The
instruments will be included in an OMB
review package submitted immediately
after the expiration of the comment
period.
Grantee-Level Data Collection
Two instruments were developed for
assessing grantee-level effects. Both
instruments are guides for interviews
that will be conducted by the grantees’
evaluators twice over the life of the SPF
SIG award. These instruments are
modified versions of those used in the
SPF SIG Cohort 1 and 2 Cross-Site
Evaluation Study (OMB–0930–0279).
The total burden of the original
instruments has been reduced by
deleting several questions and replacing
the majority of open-ended questions
with multiple-choice questions. The
Strategic Prevention Framework
Implementation Interview Protocol will
be used to assess the relationship
between SPF implementation and
change in the NOMs. The Infrastructure
Instrument will capture data to assess
infrastructure change and to test the
relationship of this change to outcomes.
Prevention infrastructure refers to the
organizational features of the system
that delivers prevention services,
including all procedures related to
planning, data management, workforce
development, intervention
implementation, evaluation and
monitoring, financial management, and
sustainability. The estimated annual
burden for grantee-level data collection
is outlined below:
GRANTEE LEVEL INSTRUMENT BURDEN ESTIMATE
Number of
responses
per respondent
Number of
respondents
Burden per
respondent
(hrs.)
Total burden
(hrs.)
Content description
SPF Implementation ..........................
SEW activities, indicators for each
SPF step, including cultural competence, throughout all five steps.
Assessment of a State’s progress
over time toward the implementation of these best practices.
32
3
2
192
State Infrastructure ............................
32
3
3
288
Total Burden ...............................
Average Annual Burden Over
Three Years.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Interview guide
..........................................................
..........................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
15
5
480
160
Community-Level Data Collection
(Revision)
The Community-Level Instrument is a
two-part, Web-based survey for
capturing information about SPF SIG
implementation at the subrecipient
community level. The instrument is a
modified version of the one in use in the
SPF SIG Cohorts 1 and 2 Cross-Site
Evaluation Study (OMB–0930–0279).
The total burden of the original
instrument was reduced by deleting
several questions.
Part 1 of the instrument focuses on
the five SPF SIG steps and efforts to
ensure cultural competency throughout
the SPF SIG process. Part 2 will capture
data on the specific intervention(s)
implemented at the community level,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Aug 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
including both individually-focused and
environmental prevention strategies.
Part 2 is a modular instrument that
includes separate subforms for each of
the eight different intervention types.
This part will be completed for each
intervention implemented during the
reporting period, selecting only those
subforms that apply to the interventions
being reported. Community partners
receiving SPF SIG awards will be
required to complete the entire online
survey once and enter updates every six
months, using a secure password
system. The estimated annual burden
for community-level data collection is
displayed in the next table. Note that
the total burden assumes an average of
15 community-level subrecipients per
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
grantee (a total of 480 respondents), an
average of three distinct interventions
implemented by each community, and
two survey updates per year.
Additionally, some questions will be
addressed only once during the data
collection process and these prior
responses will populate subsequent
updates. As community partners work
through the SPF steps, they will report
only on step-related activities. For
example, needs assessment activities
will likely precede monitoring and
evaluation activities. Thus, respondents
will answer questions related to needs
assessment in the first few reports but
will not address monitoring and
evaluation items until later in the
implementation process.
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
49693
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 164 / Friday, August 22, 2008 / Notices
COMMUNITY LEVEL INSTRUMENT BURDEN ESTIMATE
Average burden
per response
(hrs.)
Content
description
Survey section
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total burden
(hrs.)
Reporting Period 1
Part I, 1–235 ............................
Part II, 1–44 .............................
Part II, 45–280 .........................
Community Partner Activities
Prevention Intervention Information.
Intervention-Type-Specific Information.
39.5
1.3
480
480
1
3
1896
1872
12.6
480
3
0.91
0.2
480
480
5
15
2184
1440
0.15
480
15
1080
................................................
..............................
............................
............................
9076.8
................................................
..............................
............................
............................
3025.6
604.8
Reporting Periods 2–6 (updates)
Part I, 1–235 ............................
Part II, 1–44 .............................
Part II, 45–280 .........................
Total Burden Over Six Reporting Periods.
Average Annual Burden
Over Three Years.
Community Partner Activities
Prevention Intervention Information.
Intervention-Type-Specific Information.
Participant-Level Data Collection (New
Section)
Participant-level data will be
collected from all participants in direct
service programs which last 30 days or
more. Two instruments will be used for
this purpose, one for participants aged
12–17 (youth instrument) and another
for participants aged 18 or older (adult
instrument). The core sections of the
two instruments will be the CSAP
NOMs Adult and Youth Programs
Survey Forms (OMB–0930–0230).
The participant-level instruments will
be administered to each participant at
program entry, program exit, and six
months after program exit. The
following burden estimation is based on
the assumption that each subrecipient
community will serve 50 participants
per year in direct-service interventions
lasting 30 days or more, amounting to
12,000 participants per year.
PARTICIPANT LEVEL INSTRUMENT BURDEN ESTIMATE
Number of
respondents
per year
Survey type
Burden per
respondent
(hrs.)
Total annual
burden
(hrs.)
Baseline ...........................................................................................................................
Exit ...................................................................................................................................
Followup ...........................................................................................................................
12,000
10,800
8,400
0.83
0.83
0.83
9,960
8,964
6,972
Total ..........................................................................................................................
Average Annual Burden over Three Years ..............................................................
............................
............................
2.49
............................
25,896
8,632
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 7–1044, One Choke Cherry Road,
Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail her a
copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Dated: August 14, 2008.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E8–19484 Filed 8–21–08; 8:45 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:12 Aug 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS–2008–0086]
Homeland Security Advisory Council
Policy Directorate, DHS.
Notice of Open Teleconference
Federal Advisory Committee Meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Homeland Security
Advisory Council (HSAC) will meet via
teleconference for purposes of reviewing
and reporting to the Secretary of the
Department of Homeland Security the
ten most pressing strategic-level
challenges that will confront the next
Secretary of Homeland Security.
DATES: The HSAC conference call will
take place from 3 p.m. to 4 p.m. EST on
Thursday, September 11, 2008. Please
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be advised that the meeting is scheduled
for one hour and we encourage all
participating members of the public to
call-in at the beginning of the call.
ADDRESSES: The HSAC meeting will be
held via teleconference. The dial in
number is 1–800–860–2442 with a PIN
code of 82242#. Members of the public
interested in participating in this
teleconference meeting may do so by
following the process outlined below
(see ‘‘Public Attendance’’).
If you desire to submit written
comments, they must be submitted by
September 5, 2008. Comments must be
identified by DHS–2008–0086 and may
be submitted by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 164 (Friday, August 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49691-49693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19484]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant
(SPF SIG) Program (OMB No. 0930-0279) Revision
SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) is
responsible for the evaluation instruments of the Strategic Prevention
Framework State Incentive Grant (SPF SIG) Program. The program is a
major national initiative designed to: (1) Prevent the onset and reduce
the progression of substance abuse, including childhood and underage
drinking; (2) reduce substance abuse related problems in communities;
and, (3) build prevention capacity and infrastructure at the State/
territory/Tribe and community levels.
Five steps comprise the SPF:
[[Page 49692]]
Step 1: Profile population needs, resources, and readiness to
address needs and gaps.
Step 2: Mobilize and/or build capacity to address needs.
Step 3: Develop a comprehensive strategic plan.
Step 4: Implement evidence-based prevention programs, policies, and
practices.
Step 5: Monitor, evaluate, sustain, and improve or replace those
that fail.
An evaluation team is currently implementing a multi-method, quasi-
experimental evaluation of the first two Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approved SPF SIG cohorts receiving their first year grant
awards in FY 2004 and FY 2005. This is known as the Cohort 1 and 2
Cross-Site Evaluation Study, OMB-0930-0279. This 60-Day Notice invites
comment on grantee-level, community-level, and participant-level data
collection instruments designed for the cross-site evaluation of 16
Cohort 3 grantees receiving grants in FY 2006 and a yet-undetermined
number of Cohort 4 grantees to be funded in the near future. Since the
ultimate goal is to fund all eligible jurisdictions, there are no
control groups at the grantee level. The purpose of cross-site
evaluation is to measure the impact of community-funded grantees versus
non-funded communities on SAMHSA's NOMs.
Data collected at the grantee, community, and participant levels
using the three instruments will be combined in an analysis that
investigates the relationship, if any, between the SPF process and
substance use outcomes at individual and community levels. The
instruments will be included in an OMB review package submitted
immediately after the expiration of the comment period.
Grantee-Level Data Collection
Two instruments were developed for assessing grantee-level effects.
Both instruments are guides for interviews that will be conducted by
the grantees' evaluators twice over the life of the SPF SIG award.
These instruments are modified versions of those used in the SPF SIG
Cohort 1 and 2 Cross-Site Evaluation Study (OMB-0930-0279). The total
burden of the original instruments has been reduced by deleting several
questions and replacing the majority of open-ended questions with
multiple-choice questions. The Strategic Prevention Framework
Implementation Interview Protocol will be used to assess the
relationship between SPF implementation and change in the NOMs. The
Infrastructure Instrument will capture data to assess infrastructure
change and to test the relationship of this change to outcomes.
Prevention infrastructure refers to the organizational features of
the system that delivers prevention services, including all procedures
related to planning, data management, workforce development,
intervention implementation, evaluation and monitoring, financial
management, and sustainability. The estimated annual burden for
grantee-level data collection is outlined below:
Grantee Level Instrument Burden Estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Burden per
Interview guide Content description Number of responses per respondent Total burden
respondents respondent (hrs.) (hrs.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPF Implementation........................... SEW activities, indicators for each SPF 32 3 2 192
step, including cultural competence,
throughout all five steps.
State Infrastructure......................... Assessment of a State's progress over 32 3 3 288
time toward the implementation of these
best practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden............................. ......................................... .............. .............. 15 480
Average Annual Burden Over Three Years... ......................................... .............. .............. 5 160
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community-Level Data Collection (Revision)
The Community-Level Instrument is a two-part, Web-based survey for
capturing information about SPF SIG implementation at the subrecipient
community level. The instrument is a modified version of the one in use
in the SPF SIG Cohorts 1 and 2 Cross-Site Evaluation Study (OMB-0930-
0279). The total burden of the original instrument was reduced by
deleting several questions.
Part 1 of the instrument focuses on the five SPF SIG steps and
efforts to ensure cultural competency throughout the SPF SIG process.
Part 2 will capture data on the specific intervention(s) implemented at
the community level, including both individually-focused and
environmental prevention strategies. Part 2 is a modular instrument
that includes separate subforms for each of the eight different
intervention types. This part will be completed for each intervention
implemented during the reporting period, selecting only those subforms
that apply to the interventions being reported. Community partners
receiving SPF SIG awards will be required to complete the entire online
survey once and enter updates every six months, using a secure password
system. The estimated annual burden for community-level data collection
is displayed in the next table. Note that the total burden assumes an
average of 15 community-level subrecipients per grantee (a total of 480
respondents), an average of three distinct interventions implemented by
each community, and two survey updates per year. Additionally, some
questions will be addressed only once during the data collection
process and these prior responses will populate subsequent updates. As
community partners work through the SPF steps, they will report only on
step-related activities. For example, needs assessment activities will
likely precede monitoring and evaluation activities. Thus, respondents
will answer questions related to needs assessment in the first few
reports but will not address monitoring and evaluation items until
later in the implementation process.
[[Page 49693]]
Community Level Instrument Burden Estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden Number of
Survey section Content description per response Number of responses per Total burden
(hrs.) respondents respondent (hrs.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting Period 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I, 1-235............................. Community Partner Activities...... 39.5 480 1 1896
Part II, 1-44............................. Prevention Intervention 1.3 480 3 1872
Information.
Part II, 45-280........................... Intervention-Type-Specific 12.6 480 3 604.8
Information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting Periods 2-6 (updates)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part I, 1-235............................. Community Partner Activities...... 0.91 480 5 2184
Part II, 1-44............................. Prevention Intervention 0.2 480 15 1440
Information.
Part II, 45-280........................... Intervention-Type-Specific 0.15 480 15 1080
Information.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden Over Six Reporting .................................. ................. ................ ................ 9076.8
Periods.
Average Annual Burden Over Three Years .................................. ................. ................ ................ 3025.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participant-Level Data Collection (New Section)
Participant-level data will be collected from all participants in
direct service programs which last 30 days or more. Two instruments
will be used for this purpose, one for participants aged 12-17 (youth
instrument) and another for participants aged 18 or older (adult
instrument). The core sections of the two instruments will be the CSAP
NOMs Adult and Youth Programs Survey Forms (OMB-0930-0230).
The participant-level instruments will be administered to each
participant at program entry, program exit, and six months after
program exit. The following burden estimation is based on the
assumption that each subrecipient community will serve 50 participants
per year in direct-service interventions lasting 30 days or more,
amounting to 12,000 participants per year.
Participant Level Instrument Burden Estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Burden per
Survey type respondents per respondent Total annual
year (hrs.) burden (hrs.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline.................................................. 12,000 0.83 9,960
Exit...................................................... 10,800 0.83 8,964
Followup.................................................. 8,400 0.83 6,972
-----------------------------------------------------
Total................................................. ................ 2.49 25,896
Average Annual Burden over Three Years................ ................ ................ 8,632
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
Room 7-1044, One Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 20857 and e-mail her
a copy at summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be
received within 60 days of this notice.
Dated: August 14, 2008.
Elaine Parry,
Acting Director, Office of Program Services.
[FR Doc. E8-19484 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
