U.S. Citizenship for Contracts on RRF Vessels, 49357-49358 [E8-19255]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations communication that does not meet the following requirements or is not submitted within the required time limits. All communications from any party, CMS, or other affected nonparty, concerning a Board decision (or other reviewable action) that is being reviewed or may be reviewed by the Administrator must—’’ I b. Last paragraph, lines 1 through 3, through the second column, first paragraph, lines 1 through 4, the paragraph ‘‘(ii) Written submissions regarding review submitted under paragraph (c)(4) of this section. The Administrator does not consider any communication that does not meet these requirements or is not submitted within the required time limits.’’ is corrected to read ‘‘(ii) Written submissions regarding review submitted under paragraph (c)(4) of this section.’’ I 16. On page 30267, first column, sixth full paragraph, lines 2 and 3, the phrase ‘‘revising the last sentence in each of paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2)’’ is corrected to read ‘‘removing the last two sentences in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) and adding one sentence in their place in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2).’’ sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and 30-Day Delay in Effective Date We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the provisions of a rule take effect in accordance with section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we can waive this notice and comment procedure if the Secretary finds, for good cause, that the notice and comment process is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice. We find it unnecessary to undertake notice and comment rulemaking because this notice merely provides typographical and technical corrections. The revisions do not represent changes in policy, nor do they have a substantive effect, and the public interest would be best served by timely correction of these technical and typographical errors. Therefore, we find good cause to waive notice and comment procedures. Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in effective date of final rules after the date of their publication in the Federal Register. This 30-day delay in effective date can be waived, however, if an agency finds for good cause that the delay is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and the agency VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Aug 20, 2008 Jkt 214001 incorporates a statement of the findings and its reasons in the rule issued. Because this correction notice does not make substantive changes to the final rule, and the public interest is served by quickly correcting these technical errors in order to improve the clarity of the regulation, we find good cause under section 553(d)(3) of the APA to waive the 30-day delay in effective date. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare—Supplementary Medical Insurance Program) Dated: August 15, 2008. Ann C. Agnew, Executive Secretary to the Department. [FR Doc. E8–19295 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4120–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Maritime Administration 49357 vessels to the custody of the Maritime Administration for inclusion in the NDRF. Pursuant to that authority, eight Fast Sealift Ships (FSS) are being transferred from the Military Sealift Command (MSC) into the Ready Reserve Force (RRF) component of the NDRF, effective October 1, 2008. The eight FSS vessels are currently operated by Maersk Lines Limited (MLL) under contract with MSC. Under the terms of this transfer, MSC has delegated procuring contracting officer authority for the FSS contract to the Maritime Administration, which will provide oversight and direction for the remainder of the contract. Since the transferred vessels are being maintained and operated under a contract awarded by another federal agency, administration of that contract does not constitute the appointment of an Agent by the Maritime Administration under 46 CFR part 315.5. This regulation clarifies the limited duration of performance under such contracts. 46 CFR Part 315 Program Description [Docket No. MARAD 2008 0076] In this rulemaking, the Maritime Administration is clarifying the U.S. citizenship requirements for certain contacts between the owners of vessels in the RRF program of the NDRF and the Maritime Administration, by the addition of a new section to 46 CFR part 315. RIN 2133–AB73 U.S. Citizenship for Contracts on RRF Vessels Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This rulemaking clarifies Maritime Administration regulations which require that Agents (including Ship Managers) for the National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) appointed by the Maritime Administration be United States citizens. DATES: Effective August 21, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Gordon, Office of the Chief Counsel, at (202) 366–5173, via e-mail at Jay.Gordon@dot.gov, or by writing to: Jay Gordon, Office of the Chief Counsel, Maritime Administration, MAR–221, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background This rulemaking clarifies title 46 CFR part 315.5, Appointment of an Agent, which requires that Agents (including Ship Managers) for the National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) appointed by the Maritime Administration be United States citizens, as defined in § 315.3(b). This action is taken on the Maritime Administration’s initiative. Under existing authority, the Department of Defense (DOD) transfers PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Rulemaking Analyses and Notices Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures This rulemaking is not significant under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and as a consequence, OMB did not review the rule. This rulemaking is also not significant under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of Transportation (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979). It is also not considered a major rule for purposes of Congressional review under Public Law 104–121. We believe that the economic impact of this rulemaking does not warrant the preparation of a full regulatory evaluation since the rulemaking clarifies existing regulations set forth in 46 CFR part 315. Executive Order 13132 We analyzed this rulemaking in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (‘‘Federalism’’) and have determined that it does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The regulations herein have no substantial E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM 21AUR1 49358 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations effects on the States, the current Federal-State relationship, or the current distribution of power and responsibilities among local officials. Therefore, we did not consult with State and local officials because it was not necessary. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires us to assess the impact that regulations will have on small entities. After analysis of this proposed rule, the Maritime Administrator certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Environmental Assessment Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Privacy Act This rulemaking does not impose unfunded mandates under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome alternative that achieves this objective of U.S. policy. Department of Transportation guidance requires the use of a revised threshold figure of $136.1 million, which is the value of $100 million in 2008 after adjusting for inflation. You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477– 19478) or you may visit www.regulations.gov. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments We have analyzed this rule for purposes of compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and we have concluded that, under the categorical exclusions provision in section 4.05 of Maritime Administrative Order (MAO) 600–1, ‘‘Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts,’’ 50 FR 11606 (March 22, 1985), neither the preparation of an Environmental Assessment, an Environmental Impact Statement, nor a Finding of No Significant Impact for this rulemaking is required. This rulemaking will not result in any impact on the environment. Executive Order 13175—Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, dated November 6, 2000, seeks to establish regular and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials in the development of Federal policies that have tribal implications, to strengthen the United States government-togovernment relationships with Indian tribes, and to reduce the imposition of unfunded mandates upon Indian tribes. Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this regulation as it does not affect, directly or indirectly, Indian tribes. Paperwork Reduction Act A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading of this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the Unified Agenda. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES This rule does not establish a new requirement for the collection of information. Thus, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will not be requested to review and approve the information collection requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Aug 20, 2008 Jkt 214001 Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 315 Government contracts, National defense, Vessels. Accordingly, the Maritime Administration amends 46 CFR part 315 as follows: I PART 315—AGENCY AGREEMENTS AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENTS 1. The authority citation for part 315 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 50 U.S.C. App. 1744; 49 CFR 1.66. 2. Section 315.6 is added to read as follows: I § 315.6 Transferred vessels and contracts. The requirements of § 315.5(a)(1) shall not apply to a contractor managing vessels owned by the United States under a contract or contracts previously awarded by another Federal agency if the contract, and the vessels managed under such contract, are subsequently transferred to the Maritime Administration, provided the period of performance of the transferred contract does not exceed the period of performance of the original contract, including options. By order of the Maritime Administrator. Dated: August 14, 2008. Leonard Sutter, Secretary, Maritime Administration. [FR Doc. E8–19255 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–81–P E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM 21AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 163 (Thursday, August 21, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49357-49358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19255]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration

46 CFR Part 315

[Docket No. MARAD 2008 0076]
RIN 2133-AB73


U.S. Citizenship for Contracts on RRF Vessels

AGENCY: Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rulemaking clarifies Maritime Administration regulations 
which require that Agents (including Ship Managers) for the National 
Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) appointed by the Maritime Administration 
be United States citizens.

DATES: Effective August 21, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Gordon, Office of the Chief 
Counsel, at (202) 366-5173, via e-mail at Jay.Gordon@dot.gov, or by 
writing to: Jay Gordon, Office of the Chief Counsel, Maritime 
Administration, MAR-221, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 
20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This rulemaking clarifies title 46 CFR part 315.5, Appointment of 
an Agent, which requires that Agents (including Ship Managers) for the 
National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) appointed by the Maritime 
Administration be United States citizens, as defined in Sec.  315.3(b). 
This action is taken on the Maritime Administration's initiative.
    Under existing authority, the Department of Defense (DOD) transfers 
vessels to the custody of the Maritime Administration for inclusion in 
the NDRF. Pursuant to that authority, eight Fast Sealift Ships (FSS) 
are being transferred from the Military Sealift Command (MSC) into the 
Ready Reserve Force (RRF) component of the NDRF, effective October 1, 
2008. The eight FSS vessels are currently operated by Maersk Lines 
Limited (MLL) under contract with MSC. Under the terms of this 
transfer, MSC has delegated procuring contracting officer authority for 
the FSS contract to the Maritime Administration, which will provide 
oversight and direction for the remainder of the contract. Since the 
transferred vessels are being maintained and operated under a contract 
awarded by another federal agency, administration of that contract does 
not constitute the appointment of an Agent by the Maritime 
Administration under 46 CFR part 315.5.
    This regulation clarifies the limited duration of performance under 
such contracts.

Program Description

    In this rulemaking, the Maritime Administration is clarifying the 
U.S. citizenship requirements for certain contacts between the owners 
of vessels in the RRF program of the NDRF and the Maritime 
Administration, by the addition of a new section to 46 CFR part 315.

Rulemaking Analyses and Notices

Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures

    This rulemaking is not significant under section 3(f) of Executive 
Order 12866, and as a consequence, OMB did not review the rule. This 
rulemaking is also not significant under the Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures of the Department of Transportation (44 FR 11034; February 
26, 1979). It is also not considered a major rule for purposes of 
Congressional review under Public Law 104-121. We believe that the 
economic impact of this rulemaking does not warrant the preparation of 
a full regulatory evaluation since the rulemaking clarifies existing 
regulations set forth in 46 CFR part 315.

Executive Order 13132

    We analyzed this rulemaking in accordance with the principles and 
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism'') and have 
determined that it does not have sufficient federalism implications to 
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The 
regulations herein have no substantial

[[Page 49358]]

effects on the States, the current Federal-State relationship, or the 
current distribution of power and responsibilities among local 
officials. Therefore, we did not consult with State and local officials 
because it was not necessary.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires us to assess the impact 
that regulations will have on small entities. After analysis of this 
proposed rule, the Maritime Administrator certifies that this proposed 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.

Environmental Assessment

    We have analyzed this rule for purposes of compliance with the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
seq.) and we have concluded that, under the categorical exclusions 
provision in section 4.05 of Maritime Administrative Order (MAO) 600-1, 
``Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts,'' 50 FR 11606 
(March 22, 1985), neither the preparation of an Environmental 
Assessment, an Environmental Impact Statement, nor a Finding of No 
Significant Impact for this rulemaking is required. This rulemaking 
will not result in any impact on the environment.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not establish a new requirement for the collection 
of information. Thus, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will 
not be requested to review and approve the information collection 
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, 
et seq.).

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This rulemaking does not impose unfunded mandates under the 
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of 
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome 
alternative that achieves this objective of U.S. policy. Department of 
Transportation guidance requires the use of a revised threshold figure 
of $136.1 million, which is the value of $100 million in 2008 after 
adjusting for inflation.

Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination with Indian 
Tribal Governments, dated November 6, 2000, seeks to establish regular 
and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials in 
the development of Federal policies that have tribal implications, to 
strengthen the United States government-to-government relationships 
with Indian tribes, and to reduce the imposition of unfunded mandates 
upon Indian tribes. Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this 
regulation as it does not affect, directly or indirectly, Indian 
tribes.

Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)

    A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory 
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The 
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in 
April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading 
of this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the 
Unified Agenda.

Privacy Act

    You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal 
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 
19477-19478) or you may visit www.regulations.gov.

List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 315

    Government contracts, National defense, Vessels.


0
Accordingly, the Maritime Administration amends 46 CFR part 315 as 
follows:

PART 315--AGENCY AGREEMENTS AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 315 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. App. 1744; 49 CFR 1.66.


0
2. Section 315.6 is added to read as follows:


Sec.  315.6  Transferred vessels and contracts.

    The requirements of Sec.  315.5(a)(1) shall not apply to a 
contractor managing vessels owned by the United States under a contract 
or contracts previously awarded by another Federal agency if the 
contract, and the vessels managed under such contract, are subsequently 
transferred to the Maritime Administration, provided the period of 
performance of the transferred contract does not exceed the period of 
performance of the original contract, including options.

    By order of the Maritime Administrator.

     Dated: August 14, 2008.
Leonard Sutter,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-19255 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.