U.S. Citizenship for Contracts on RRF Vessels, 49357-49358 [E8-19255]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
communication that does not meet the
following requirements or is not
submitted within the required time
limits. All communications from any
party, CMS, or other affected nonparty,
concerning a Board decision (or other
reviewable action) that is being
reviewed or may be reviewed by the
Administrator must—’’
I b. Last paragraph, lines 1 through 3,
through the second column, first
paragraph, lines 1 through 4, the
paragraph ‘‘(ii) Written submissions
regarding review submitted under
paragraph (c)(4) of this section. The
Administrator does not consider any
communication that does not meet these
requirements or is not submitted within
the required time limits.’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘(ii) Written submissions regarding
review submitted under paragraph (c)(4)
of this section.’’
I 16. On page 30267, first column, sixth
full paragraph, lines 2 and 3, the phrase
‘‘revising the last sentence in each of
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2)’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘removing the last two sentences
in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) and
adding one sentence in their place in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2).’’
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and 30-Day Delay in Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register to provide a period for public
comment before the provisions of a rule
take effect in accordance with section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However,
we can waive this notice and comment
procedure if the Secretary finds, for
good cause, that the notice and
comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, and incorporates a statement of
the finding and the reasons therefore in
the notice.
We find it unnecessary to undertake
notice and comment rulemaking
because this notice merely provides
typographical and technical corrections.
The revisions do not represent changes
in policy, nor do they have a substantive
effect, and the public interest would be
best served by timely correction of these
technical and typographical errors.
Therefore, we find good cause to waive
notice and comment procedures.
Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily
requires a 30-day delay in effective date
of final rules after the date of their
publication in the Federal Register.
This 30-day delay in effective date can
be waived, however, if an agency finds
for good cause that the delay is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, and the agency
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Aug 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
incorporates a statement of the findings
and its reasons in the rule issued.
Because this correction notice does
not make substantive changes to the
final rule, and the public interest is
served by quickly correcting these
technical errors in order to improve the
clarity of the regulation, we find good
cause under section 553(d)(3) of the
APA to waive the 30-day delay in
effective date.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: August 15, 2008.
Ann C. Agnew,
Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. E8–19295 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
49357
vessels to the custody of the Maritime
Administration for inclusion in the
NDRF. Pursuant to that authority, eight
Fast Sealift Ships (FSS) are being
transferred from the Military Sealift
Command (MSC) into the Ready Reserve
Force (RRF) component of the NDRF,
effective October 1, 2008. The eight FSS
vessels are currently operated by Maersk
Lines Limited (MLL) under contract
with MSC. Under the terms of this
transfer, MSC has delegated procuring
contracting officer authority for the FSS
contract to the Maritime
Administration, which will provide
oversight and direction for the
remainder of the contract. Since the
transferred vessels are being maintained
and operated under a contract awarded
by another federal agency,
administration of that contract does not
constitute the appointment of an Agent
by the Maritime Administration under
46 CFR part 315.5.
This regulation clarifies the limited
duration of performance under such
contracts.
46 CFR Part 315
Program Description
[Docket No. MARAD 2008 0076]
In this rulemaking, the Maritime
Administration is clarifying the U.S.
citizenship requirements for certain
contacts between the owners of vessels
in the RRF program of the NDRF and the
Maritime Administration, by the
addition of a new section to 46 CFR part
315.
RIN 2133–AB73
U.S. Citizenship for Contracts on RRF
Vessels
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rulemaking clarifies
Maritime Administration regulations
which require that Agents (including
Ship Managers) for the National Defense
Reserve Fleet (NDRF) appointed by the
Maritime Administration be United
States citizens.
DATES: Effective August 21, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay
Gordon, Office of the Chief Counsel, at
(202) 366–5173, via e-mail at
Jay.Gordon@dot.gov, or by writing to:
Jay Gordon, Office of the Chief Counsel,
Maritime Administration, MAR–221,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
This rulemaking clarifies title 46 CFR
part 315.5, Appointment of an Agent,
which requires that Agents (including
Ship Managers) for the National Defense
Reserve Fleet (NDRF) appointed by the
Maritime Administration be United
States citizens, as defined in § 315.3(b).
This action is taken on the Maritime
Administration’s initiative.
Under existing authority, the
Department of Defense (DOD) transfers
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This rulemaking is not significant
under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866, and as a consequence, OMB did
not review the rule. This rulemaking is
also not significant under the Regulatory
Policies and Procedures of the
Department of Transportation (44 FR
11034; February 26, 1979). It is also not
considered a major rule for purposes of
Congressional review under Public Law
104–121. We believe that the economic
impact of this rulemaking does not
warrant the preparation of a full
regulatory evaluation since the
rulemaking clarifies existing regulations
set forth in 46 CFR part 315.
Executive Order 13132
We analyzed this rulemaking in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’) and have
determined that it does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations herein have no substantial
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
49358
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
effects on the States, the current
Federal-State relationship, or the
current distribution of power and
responsibilities among local officials.
Therefore, we did not consult with State
and local officials because it was not
necessary.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires us to assess the impact that
regulations will have on small entities.
After analysis of this proposed rule, the
Maritime Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Environmental Assessment
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Privacy Act
This rulemaking does not impose
unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. It does not result in costs of $100
million or more to either State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, and is the least
burdensome alternative that achieves
this objective of U.S. policy. Department
of Transportation guidance requires the
use of a revised threshold figure of
$136.1 million, which is the value of
$100 million in 2008 after adjusting for
inflation.
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
19478) or you may visit
www.regulations.gov.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
We have analyzed this rule for
purposes of compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
and we have concluded that, under the
categorical exclusions provision in
section 4.05 of Maritime Administrative
Order (MAO) 600–1, ‘‘Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts,’’
50 FR 11606 (March 22, 1985), neither
the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment, an Environmental Impact
Statement, nor a Finding of No
Significant Impact for this rulemaking is
required. This rulemaking will not
result in any impact on the
environment.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, dated November 6, 2000,
seeks to establish regular and
meaningful consultation and
collaboration with tribal officials in the
development of Federal policies that
have tribal implications, to strengthen
the United States government-togovernment relationships with Indian
tribes, and to reduce the imposition of
unfunded mandates upon Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this regulation as it does not affect,
directly or indirectly, Indian tribes.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN number contained in the
heading of this document can be used
to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
This rule does not establish a new
requirement for the collection of
information. Thus, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) will not
be requested to review and approve the
information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Aug 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 315
Government contracts, National
defense, Vessels.
Accordingly, the Maritime
Administration amends 46 CFR part 315
as follows:
I
PART 315—AGENCY AGREEMENTS
AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENTS
1. The authority citation for part 315
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 50 U.S.C. App. 1744; 49 CFR
1.66.
2. Section 315.6 is added to read as
follows:
I
§ 315.6
Transferred vessels and contracts.
The requirements of § 315.5(a)(1) shall
not apply to a contractor managing
vessels owned by the United States
under a contract or contracts previously
awarded by another Federal agency if
the contract, and the vessels managed
under such contract, are subsequently
transferred to the Maritime
Administration, provided the period of
performance of the transferred contract
does not exceed the period of
performance of the original contract,
including options.
By order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: August 14, 2008.
Leonard Sutter,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–19255 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
E:\FR\FM\21AUR1.SGM
21AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 163 (Thursday, August 21, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49357-49358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19255]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 315
[Docket No. MARAD 2008 0076]
RIN 2133-AB73
U.S. Citizenship for Contracts on RRF Vessels
AGENCY: Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rulemaking clarifies Maritime Administration regulations
which require that Agents (including Ship Managers) for the National
Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) appointed by the Maritime Administration
be United States citizens.
DATES: Effective August 21, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Gordon, Office of the Chief
Counsel, at (202) 366-5173, via e-mail at Jay.Gordon@dot.gov, or by
writing to: Jay Gordon, Office of the Chief Counsel, Maritime
Administration, MAR-221, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This rulemaking clarifies title 46 CFR part 315.5, Appointment of
an Agent, which requires that Agents (including Ship Managers) for the
National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) appointed by the Maritime
Administration be United States citizens, as defined in Sec. 315.3(b).
This action is taken on the Maritime Administration's initiative.
Under existing authority, the Department of Defense (DOD) transfers
vessels to the custody of the Maritime Administration for inclusion in
the NDRF. Pursuant to that authority, eight Fast Sealift Ships (FSS)
are being transferred from the Military Sealift Command (MSC) into the
Ready Reserve Force (RRF) component of the NDRF, effective October 1,
2008. The eight FSS vessels are currently operated by Maersk Lines
Limited (MLL) under contract with MSC. Under the terms of this
transfer, MSC has delegated procuring contracting officer authority for
the FSS contract to the Maritime Administration, which will provide
oversight and direction for the remainder of the contract. Since the
transferred vessels are being maintained and operated under a contract
awarded by another federal agency, administration of that contract does
not constitute the appointment of an Agent by the Maritime
Administration under 46 CFR part 315.5.
This regulation clarifies the limited duration of performance under
such contracts.
Program Description
In this rulemaking, the Maritime Administration is clarifying the
U.S. citizenship requirements for certain contacts between the owners
of vessels in the RRF program of the NDRF and the Maritime
Administration, by the addition of a new section to 46 CFR part 315.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This rulemaking is not significant under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866, and as a consequence, OMB did not review the rule. This
rulemaking is also not significant under the Regulatory Policies and
Procedures of the Department of Transportation (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979). It is also not considered a major rule for purposes of
Congressional review under Public Law 104-121. We believe that the
economic impact of this rulemaking does not warrant the preparation of
a full regulatory evaluation since the rulemaking clarifies existing
regulations set forth in 46 CFR part 315.
Executive Order 13132
We analyzed this rulemaking in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism'') and have
determined that it does not have sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations herein have no substantial
[[Page 49358]]
effects on the States, the current Federal-State relationship, or the
current distribution of power and responsibilities among local
officials. Therefore, we did not consult with State and local officials
because it was not necessary.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires us to assess the impact
that regulations will have on small entities. After analysis of this
proposed rule, the Maritime Administrator certifies that this proposed
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Environmental Assessment
We have analyzed this rule for purposes of compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) and we have concluded that, under the categorical exclusions
provision in section 4.05 of Maritime Administrative Order (MAO) 600-1,
``Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts,'' 50 FR 11606
(March 22, 1985), neither the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment, an Environmental Impact Statement, nor a Finding of No
Significant Impact for this rulemaking is required. This rulemaking
will not result in any impact on the environment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not establish a new requirement for the collection
of information. Thus, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will
not be requested to review and approve the information collection
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rulemaking does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome
alternative that achieves this objective of U.S. policy. Department of
Transportation guidance requires the use of a revised threshold figure
of $136.1 million, which is the value of $100 million in 2008 after
adjusting for inflation.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments, dated November 6, 2000, seeks to establish regular
and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials in
the development of Federal policies that have tribal implications, to
strengthen the United States government-to-government relationships
with Indian tribes, and to reduce the imposition of unfunded mandates
upon Indian tribes. Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
regulation as it does not affect, directly or indirectly, Indian
tribes.
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading
of this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
Privacy Act
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-19478) or you may visit www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 315
Government contracts, National defense, Vessels.
0
Accordingly, the Maritime Administration amends 46 CFR part 315 as
follows:
PART 315--AGENCY AGREEMENTS AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 315 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. App. 1744; 49 CFR 1.66.
0
2. Section 315.6 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 315.6 Transferred vessels and contracts.
The requirements of Sec. 315.5(a)(1) shall not apply to a
contractor managing vessels owned by the United States under a contract
or contracts previously awarded by another Federal agency if the
contract, and the vessels managed under such contract, are subsequently
transferred to the Maritime Administration, provided the period of
performance of the transferred contract does not exceed the period of
performance of the original contract, including options.
By order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: August 14, 2008.
Leonard Sutter,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-19255 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P