Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Admission of Foreign Entities as Direct Depository Participants, 48411-48413 [E8-19133]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 19, 2008 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting
[Release No. 34–58345; File No. SR–DTC–
2007–16]
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the provisions of the Government in the
Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94–409, that the
Securities and Exchange Commission
will hold a Closed Meeting on
Thursday, August 21, 2008 at 2 p.m.
Commissioners, Counsel to the
Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries
will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain
staff members who have an interest in
the matters also may be present.
The General Counsel of the
Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or
more of the exemptions set forth in 5
U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10)
and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii)
and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed
Meeting.
Commissioner Paredes, as duty
officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed
session.
The subject matter of the Closed
Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
August 21, 2008 will be:
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Depository Trust Company; Order
Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the Admission of
Foreign Entities as Direct Depository
Participants
Formal orders of investigation;
institution and settlement of injunctive
actions;
institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings of an
enforcement nature; and
adjudicatory matters.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact:
The Office of the Secretary at (202)
551–5400.
Dated: August 14, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–19214 Filed 8–18–08; 8:45 am]
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:33 Aug 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
August 12, 2008.
I. Introduction
On November 16, 2007, The
Depository Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) and on
February 5, 2008, amended proposed
rule change SR–DTC–2007–13 pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 Notice
of the proposal was published in the
Federal Register on March 7, 2008.2 No
comment letters were received. For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission is granting approval of the
proposed rule change as modified by
Amendment No. 1.
II. Description
The proposed rule change amends
DTC’s policy statement regarding the
admission of participants to permit
entities that are organized in a foreign
country and are not subject to U.S.
federal or state regulation (‘‘foreign
entities’’) to become eligible to become
direct DTC participants (‘‘Foreign Entity
Policy Statement’’).3
In 1990, DTC adopted a Policy
Statement on the Admission of
Participants (‘‘1990 Policy Statement’’)
to make clear that in determining
whether to grant access to its services,
DTC regards as a critical factor that an
applicant is subject to comprehensive
U.S. federal or state regulation relating
to, among other things, capital
adequacy, financial reporting and
recordkeeping, operating performance,
and business conduct.4 Generally under
the 1990 Policy Statement, unless an
applicant is subject to U.S. federal or
state regulatory agency oversight, the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Exchange Act Release No. 57392
(February 27, 2008), 73 FR 12485.
3 The National Securities Clearing Corporation
(‘‘NSCC’’) filed and the Commission has approved
a similar proposed rule change that would permit
NSCC to adopt a similar policy statement with
respect to the admission of foreign entities as
members. Securities Exchange Act Release No.
58344 (August 12, 2008) (File No. SR–NSCC–2007–
15).
4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 28754
(January 8, 1991), 56 FR 1548 (January 15, 1991)
(File No. SR–DTC–90–01).
2 Securities
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48411
applicant would not be eligible to
become a DTC participant.5 Since 1990,
DTC has admitted a small number of
foreign entities where their obligations
to DTC have been guaranteed by
creditworthy DTC participants.
The purpose of the proposed Foreign
Entity Policy Statement is to establish
admissions criteria that will permit
well-qualified foreign entities to become
participants of DTC and to obtain direct
access to DTC’s services while assuring
that the unique risks associated with the
admission of foreign entities are
adequately addressed.6
The admission of foreign entities as
participants raises a number of unique
risks and issues, including that (1) the
entity is not subject to U.S. federal or
state regulation, (2) that the operation of
the laws of the entity’s home country
and time zone differences 7 may impede
the successful exercise of DTC’s rights
and remedies particularly in the event
of the entity’s failure to settle, and (3)
financial information about the foreign
entity made available to DTC for
monitoring purposes may be less
adequate than the financial information
about U.S.-based entities.
The Foreign Entity Policy Statement
requires that in addition to executing
the standard DTC Participation
Agreement the foreign entity enter into
a series of undertakings and agreements
that are designed to address
jurisdictional concerns and to assure
that DTC is provided with audited
financial information that is acceptable
to DTC.8 The proposed policy statement
would also require that the foreign
entity (1) be subject to regulation in its
home country and (2) be in good
5 DTC recognized, however, that any person
designated by the Commission pursuant to Section
17A(b)(3)(B)(vi) of the Act, even if not subject to
such regulatory oversight, would be eligible for
admission. The 1990 Policy Statement was
approved by the Commission on January 8, 1991.
6 DTC’s proposed ‘‘Policy Statement on the
Admission of Non-U.S. Entities as Direct Depository
Participants’’ is attached as Exhibit 5 to its filing,
which can be found at https://www.dtcc.com/
downloads/legal/rule_filings/2007/dtc/2007–16.pdf.
7 Time zone differences may complicate
communications between a foreign participant and
its U.S. Settling Bank with respect to the timely
payment of the participant’s net debit to DTC
including intraday demands for payment. These
differences may also delay DTC’s receipt of
information available in the foreign participant’s
home country to others including its other creditors
about the foreign participant’s financial condition
on the basis of which DTC would have taken steps
to protect the interests of DTC and its participants.
8 In the Foreign Entity Policy Statement, DTC has
reserved the right to waive certain of these criteria
where such criteria are inappropriate to a particular
applicant or class of applicants (e.g., a foreign
government or international or national central
securities depositories).
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
48412
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 19, 2008 / Notices
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
standing with its home country
regulator.
The Foreign Entity Policy Statement
was previously approved by the
Commission on a temporary basis in
1997.9 As currently proposed, the
Foreign Entity Policy Statement would
retain all the requirements of the
previous version with the exception of
the ‘‘special financial conditions’’
requirements, as explained below. It
would also include new requirements
with respect to non-U.S. GAAP financial
statements and anti-money laundering
(‘‘AML’’) risk.
The Foreign Entity Policy Statement
previously included ‘‘special financial
conditions’’ requirements applicable to
participants that were foreign entities.
The special financial conditions
requirements mandated that a foreign
entity have and maintain minimum net
capital of 1000% of the minimum net
capital for the admission of a U.S.
entity. A foreign entity was also
required to have additional ‘‘special
collateral’’ in its account equal to fifty
percent of its net debit cap. Any net
debit of the foreign entity had to be
supported by the value of other, nonspecial collateral including securities
received by the participant valued in
accordance with DTC’s customary
haircuts. Except for U.S. Treasury
securities, which received a haircut of 2
percent, securities posted as special
collateral received a haircut of 50% of
their market value. The foreign entity
did not receive credit for special
collateral in DTC’s collateral monitor.
DTC now believes that its net debit cap,
collateral monitor, and other risk
management controls and procedures
applicable to all participants together
with the other requirements of the
Foreign Entity Policy Statement would
adequately limit DTC’s exposure in the
event of a failure to settle and
insolvency of a foreign participant
without the need for the special
financial conditions requirement.10
9 Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 38600
(May 9, 1997), 62 FR 27086 (May 16, 1997) (File No.
SR–DTC–96–13); 40064 (June 3, 1998), 63 FR 31818
(June 10, 1998) (File No. SR–DTC–98–11); 41466
(May 28, 1999), 64 FR 30077 (June 4, 1999) (File
No. SR–DTC–99–12); 42865 (May 30, 2000), 65 FR
36188 (June 7, 2000) (File No. SR–DTC–00–07);
44470 (June 22, 2001), 66 FR 34972 (July 2, 2001)
(File No. SR–DTC–2001–10). Approval of the
Foreign Entity Policy Statement as previously filed
and temporarily approved by the Commission
extended through May 31, 2002.
10 Additionally, in the Foreign Entity Policy
Statement, DTC has reserved the right to require a
foreign entity to deposit additional amounts to
DTC’s participants fund and the right to require a
letter of credit as the form of participant fund
collateral where DTC in its sole discretion believes
the entity presents legal risk.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:12 Aug 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
The Foreign Entity Policy Statement
also previously required foreign entities
to provide to DTC for financial
monitoring purposes audited financial
statements prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (‘‘GAAP’’) or other generally
accepted accounting principles that
were satisfactory to DTC. As proposed,
the Foreign Entity Policy Statement will
provide for the submission of audited
financial statements other than U.S.
GAAP, but to address the risk presented
by accepting financial statements
prepared in non-U.S. GAAP, DTC would
increase the existing minimum financial
requirements for any foreign entity
submitting its financial statements in
non-U.S. GAAP by a premium. The
premiums would be as follows:
(i) 11⁄2 times the existing requirement
for a foreign entity submitting financial
statements prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting
Standards (‘‘IFRS’’), the Companies Act
of 1985 (‘‘UK GAAP’’), or Canadian
GAAP;
(ii) 5 times the existing requirement
for a foreign entity submitting financial
statements prepared in accordance with
a European Union (‘‘EU’’) country
GAAP other than UK GAAP; and
(iii) 7 times the existing requirement
for a foreign entity submitting financial
statements prepared in accordance with
any other type of GAAP.
Finally, DTC is proposing to add a
new requirement to the Foreign Entity
Policy Statement that a foreign entity
must provide sufficient information to
DTC so that DTC can evaluate AML risk.
III. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
requires that the rules of a clearing
agency be designed to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in the custody or control of
the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible.11 When the Commission
previously approved DTC’s Foreign
Entity Policy Statement it found that the
policy statement was designed to
address the jurisdiction differences in
regulatory structure and in business
operations of non-U.S. entities with
respect to risk control and management.
Additionally, the Commission found
that the policy statement was designed
to bind non-U.S. entities to DTC’s rules
and procedures in a manner similar to
domestic participants and was designed
to lesson or eliminate the negative
effects that jurisdictional issues could
have on DTC’s exercise of its rights
against non-U.S. entities. The proposed
rule change adopts a Foreign Entity
11 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Policy Statement that is substantially
similar to the one previously approved
by the Commission. DTC has eliminated
the special financial conditions that
were included in the earlier policy
statement and has added a new
requirement to increase the minimum
financial requirements if the foreign
participant submits audited financial
statements prepared using non-U.S.
GAAP. The multiples used to calculate
the premiums DTC will charge for nonU.S. GAAP are identical to those the
Commission previously approved for
the Government Securities Division and
MBS Division of the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation.12 Although DTC
will collect less collateral than was
required under the earlier policy
statement, we are satisfied with DTC’s
explanation that its other financial
controls, such as in its discretion
requiring a letter of credit, are
sufficiently designed to limit risk of loss
to DTC or its participants as a result of
a foreign participant’s insolvency. In
addition, recent changes in bankruptcy
law have raised questions about
whether DTC could enforce its rights to
a participant’s collateral in non-U.S.
jurisdictions. The changes with respect
to the participants’ minimum financial
requirements should help to ensure that
all foreign participants have sufficient
financial resources to be participants in
and meet their settlement obligations to
DTC. Accordingly, based on this and the
earlier findings, we find that the Foreign
Entity Policy Statement is designed
assure the safeguarding of securities and
funds which are in which are in the
custody or control of DTC or for which
it is responsible.
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and in
particular Section 17A of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder.13
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
DTC–2007–16), as modified by
Amendment No. 1, be and hereby is
approved.
12 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51385
(March 16, 2005), 70 FR 14736 (March 23, 2005)
(File No. SR–FICC–2004–14).
13 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 161 / Tuesday, August 19, 2008 / Notices
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–19133 Filed 8–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58335; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2008–053]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule
Change To Modify the Definition of
‘‘Independent Director’’
August 8, 2008.
On June 6, 2008, The NASDAQ Stock
Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
modify Nasdaq’s definition of
‘‘independent director.’’ The proposed
rule change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on July 2, 2008.3
The Commission received no comments
on the proposal.
Currently, Nasdaq Rule 4200(a)(15)(B)
provides that a director of a listed
company who accepted, or has a family
member who accepted, any
compensation from the company in
excess of $100,000 during any period of
twelve months within the preceding
three years cannot be deemed an
independent director (with certain
exceptions). The proposed rule change
would change this threshold amount to
$120,000.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange, and in particular with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act.4 The Commission
notes that Regulation S–K, Item 404,
under the Act,5 which requires public
companies to disclose certain material
information regarding the independence
of directors (among other ‘‘related
persons’’ associated with the company),
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(l).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58029
(June 26, 2008), 73 FR 38016.
4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). In approving this proposed
rule change, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
5 17 CFR 229.404 and 17 CFR 228.404.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
1 15
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:12 Aug 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
establishes $120,000 as the amount
above which financial transactions and
relationships involving a company and
its directors must be disclosed.6 The
Commission believes that it is
appropriate for Nasdaq to use this same
threshold amount with regard to its
definition of ‘‘independent director’’ in
Nasdaq Rule 4200(a)(15) as a ‘‘bright
line’’ test to determine whether a
director of a listed company would be
precluded from being considered
independent. The Commission further
notes that even if a director (or a family
member) received less than $120,000 in
compensation from the listed company,
the company’s board still would have to
make an affirmative determination that
the director has no relationship with the
listed company that, in the board’s
opinion, would interfere with the
exercise of his or her independent
judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of a director.7
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,8 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NASDAQ–
2008–053) be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–19113 Filed 8–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–58344; File No. SR–NSCC–
2007–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Order Granting Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to
the Admission of Foreign Entities
August 12, 2008.
I. Introduction
On November 16, 2007, National
Securities Clearing Corporation
(‘‘NSCC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
proposed rule change SR–NSCC–2006–
15 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’).1 Notice of the proposal was
published in the Federal Register on
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
54302A (August 29, 2006), 71 FR 53158 (September
8, 2006).
7 See Nasdaq Rule 4200(a)(15) and IM–4200.
8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48413
March 10, 2008.2 No comment letters
were received. For the reasons
discussed below, the Commission is
granting approval of the proposed rule
change.
II. Description
The proposed rule change establishes
a policy statement regarding the
admission of entities that are organized
in a foreign country and are not subject
to U.S. federal or state regulation
(‘‘foreign entities’’) as members of
NSCC.3 NSCC Rule 2 and Addendum B
to NSCC’s Rules address the admission
of applicants as NSCC members. NSCC’s
Rules provide that admission as a
member is subject to an applicant’s
demonstration that it meets NSCC’s
standards of financial responsibility,
operational capability, and character.
Additionally, each member must
continue to be in a position to
demonstrate to NSCC that it meets these
standards. The purpose of the proposed
rule change is to establish admission
criteria that will permit well-qualified
foreign entities to become NSCC
members and thereby obtain direct
access to NSCC’s services while
assuring that the unique risks associated
with the admission of foreign entities
are adequately addressed.
The admission of foreign entities as
members raises a number of unique
risks and issues, including that (1) the
entity is not subject to U.S. federal or
state regulation, (2) the operation of the
laws of the entity’s home country and
time zone differences 4 may impede the
successful exercise of NSCC’s rights and
remedies particularly in the event of the
entity’s failure to settle, and (3) financial
information about the foreign entity
made available to NSCC for monitoring
purposes may be less adequate than
information about U.S.-based entities.
2 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57391
(February 27, 2008), 71 FR 76414.
3 The Depository Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’) filed
and the Commission has granted approval of a
similar proposed rule change that would permit
DTC to adopt a similar policy statement with
respect to the admission of foreign entities as
participants. Securities Exchange Act Release No.
58345 (August 12, 2008) (File No. SR–DTC–2007–
16).
4 Time zone differences could complicate
communications between the foreign member and
its U.S. Settling Bank with respect to the timely
payment of the member’s net debit to NSCC,
including intraday demands for payment. These
differences could also delay NSCC’s receipt of
information available in the member’s home
country to others (including its other creditors)
about the member’s financial condition on the basis
of which NSCC would have taken steps to protect
the interests of NSCC and its members.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48411-48413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19133]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-58345; File No. SR-DTC-2007-16]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company;
Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Admission of Foreign Entities as Direct Depository Participants
August 12, 2008.
I. Introduction
On November 16, 2007, The Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') and on
February 5, 2008, amended proposed rule change SR-DTC-2007-13 pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'').\1\ Notice of the proposal was published in the Federal
Register on March 7, 2008.\2\ No comment letters were received. For the
reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting approval of the
proposed rule change as modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57392 (February 27,
2008), 73 FR 12485.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description
The proposed rule change amends DTC's policy statement regarding
the admission of participants to permit entities that are organized in
a foreign country and are not subject to U.S. federal or state
regulation (``foreign entities'') to become eligible to become direct
DTC participants (``Foreign Entity Policy Statement'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'')
filed and the Commission has approved a similar proposed rule change
that would permit NSCC to adopt a similar policy statement with
respect to the admission of foreign entities as members. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 58344 (August 12, 2008) (File No. SR-NSCC-
2007-15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1990, DTC adopted a Policy Statement on the Admission of
Participants (``1990 Policy Statement'') to make clear that in
determining whether to grant access to its services, DTC regards as a
critical factor that an applicant is subject to comprehensive U.S.
federal or state regulation relating to, among other things, capital
adequacy, financial reporting and recordkeeping, operating performance,
and business conduct.\4\ Generally under the 1990 Policy Statement,
unless an applicant is subject to U.S. federal or state regulatory
agency oversight, the applicant would not be eligible to become a DTC
participant.\5\ Since 1990, DTC has admitted a small number of foreign
entities where their obligations to DTC have been guaranteed by
creditworthy DTC participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 28754 (January 8, 1991),
56 FR 1548 (January 15, 1991) (File No. SR-DTC-90-01).
\5\ DTC recognized, however, that any person designated by the
Commission pursuant to Section 17A(b)(3)(B)(vi) of the Act, even if
not subject to such regulatory oversight, would be eligible for
admission. The 1990 Policy Statement was approved by the Commission
on January 8, 1991.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of the proposed Foreign Entity Policy Statement is to
establish admissions criteria that will permit well-qualified foreign
entities to become participants of DTC and to obtain direct access to
DTC's services while assuring that the unique risks associated with the
admission of foreign entities are adequately addressed.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ DTC's proposed ``Policy Statement on the Admission of Non-
U.S. Entities as Direct Depository Participants'' is attached as
Exhibit 5 to its filing, which can be found at https://www.dtcc.com/
downloads/legal/rule_filings/2007/dtc/2007-16.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The admission of foreign entities as participants raises a number
of unique risks and issues, including that (1) the entity is not
subject to U.S. federal or state regulation, (2) that the operation of
the laws of the entity's home country and time zone differences \7\ may
impede the successful exercise of DTC's rights and remedies
particularly in the event of the entity's failure to settle, and (3)
financial information about the foreign entity made available to DTC
for monitoring purposes may be less adequate than the financial
information about U.S.-based entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Time zone differences may complicate communications between
a foreign participant and its U.S. Settling Bank with respect to the
timely payment of the participant's net debit to DTC including
intraday demands for payment. These differences may also delay DTC's
receipt of information available in the foreign participant's home
country to others including its other creditors about the foreign
participant's financial condition on the basis of which DTC would
have taken steps to protect the interests of DTC and its
participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Foreign Entity Policy Statement requires that in addition to
executing the standard DTC Participation Agreement the foreign entity
enter into a series of undertakings and agreements that are designed to
address jurisdictional concerns and to assure that DTC is provided with
audited financial information that is acceptable to DTC.\8\ The
proposed policy statement would also require that the foreign entity
(1) be subject to regulation in its home country and (2) be in good
[[Page 48412]]
standing with its home country regulator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ In the Foreign Entity Policy Statement, DTC has reserved the
right to waive certain of these criteria where such criteria are
inappropriate to a particular applicant or class of applicants
(e.g., a foreign government or international or national central
securities depositories).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Foreign Entity Policy Statement was previously approved by the
Commission on a temporary basis in 1997.\9\ As currently proposed, the
Foreign Entity Policy Statement would retain all the requirements of
the previous version with the exception of the ``special financial
conditions'' requirements, as explained below. It would also include
new requirements with respect to non-U.S. GAAP financial statements and
anti-money laundering (``AML'') risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 38600 (May 9, 1997), 62
FR 27086 (May 16, 1997) (File No. SR-DTC-96-13); 40064 (June 3,
1998), 63 FR 31818 (June 10, 1998) (File No. SR-DTC-98-11); 41466
(May 28, 1999), 64 FR 30077 (June 4, 1999) (File No. SR-DTC-99-12);
42865 (May 30, 2000), 65 FR 36188 (June 7, 2000) (File No. SR-DTC-
00-07); 44470 (June 22, 2001), 66 FR 34972 (July 2, 2001) (File No.
SR-DTC-2001-10). Approval of the Foreign Entity Policy Statement as
previously filed and temporarily approved by the Commission extended
through May 31, 2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Foreign Entity Policy Statement previously included ``special
financial conditions'' requirements applicable to participants that
were foreign entities. The special financial conditions requirements
mandated that a foreign entity have and maintain minimum net capital of
1000% of the minimum net capital for the admission of a U.S. entity. A
foreign entity was also required to have additional ``special
collateral'' in its account equal to fifty percent of its net debit
cap. Any net debit of the foreign entity had to be supported by the
value of other, non-special collateral including securities received by
the participant valued in accordance with DTC's customary haircuts.
Except for U.S. Treasury securities, which received a haircut of 2
percent, securities posted as special collateral received a haircut of
50% of their market value. The foreign entity did not receive credit
for special collateral in DTC's collateral monitor. DTC now believes
that its net debit cap, collateral monitor, and other risk management
controls and procedures applicable to all participants together with
the other requirements of the Foreign Entity Policy Statement would
adequately limit DTC's exposure in the event of a failure to settle and
insolvency of a foreign participant without the need for the special
financial conditions requirement.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Additionally, in the Foreign Entity Policy Statement, DTC
has reserved the right to require a foreign entity to deposit
additional amounts to DTC's participants fund and the right to
require a letter of credit as the form of participant fund
collateral where DTC in its sole discretion believes the entity
presents legal risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Foreign Entity Policy Statement also previously required
foreign entities to provide to DTC for financial monitoring purposes
audited financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (``GAAP'') or other generally accepted
accounting principles that were satisfactory to DTC. As proposed, the
Foreign Entity Policy Statement will provide for the submission of
audited financial statements other than U.S. GAAP, but to address the
risk presented by accepting financial statements prepared in non-U.S.
GAAP, DTC would increase the existing minimum financial requirements
for any foreign entity submitting its financial statements in non-U.S.
GAAP by a premium. The premiums would be as follows:
(i) 1\1/2\ times the existing requirement for a foreign entity
submitting financial statements prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (``IFRS''), the Companies
Act of 1985 (``UK GAAP''), or Canadian GAAP;
(ii) 5 times the existing requirement for a foreign entity
submitting financial statements prepared in accordance with a European
Union (``EU'') country GAAP other than UK GAAP; and
(iii) 7 times the existing requirement for a foreign entity
submitting financial statements prepared in accordance with any other
type of GAAP.
Finally, DTC is proposing to add a new requirement to the Foreign
Entity Policy Statement that a foreign entity must provide sufficient
information to DTC so that DTC can evaluate AML risk.
III. Discussion
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the rules of a
clearing agency be designed to assure the safeguarding of securities
and funds which are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or
for which it is responsible.\11\ When the Commission previously
approved DTC's Foreign Entity Policy Statement it found that the policy
statement was designed to address the jurisdiction differences in
regulatory structure and in business operations of non-U.S. entities
with respect to risk control and management. Additionally, the
Commission found that the policy statement was designed to bind non-
U.S. entities to DTC's rules and procedures in a manner similar to
domestic participants and was designed to lesson or eliminate the
negative effects that jurisdictional issues could have on DTC's
exercise of its rights against non-U.S. entities. The proposed rule
change adopts a Foreign Entity Policy Statement that is substantially
similar to the one previously approved by the Commission. DTC has
eliminated the special financial conditions that were included in the
earlier policy statement and has added a new requirement to increase
the minimum financial requirements if the foreign participant submits
audited financial statements prepared using non-U.S. GAAP. The
multiples used to calculate the premiums DTC will charge for non-U.S.
GAAP are identical to those the Commission previously approved for the
Government Securities Division and MBS Division of the Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation.\12\ Although DTC will collect less collateral
than was required under the earlier policy statement, we are satisfied
with DTC's explanation that its other financial controls, such as in
its discretion requiring a letter of credit, are sufficiently designed
to limit risk of loss to DTC or its participants as a result of a
foreign participant's insolvency. In addition, recent changes in
bankruptcy law have raised questions about whether DTC could enforce
its rights to a participant's collateral in non-U.S. jurisdictions. The
changes with respect to the participants' minimum financial
requirements should help to ensure that all foreign participants have
sufficient financial resources to be participants in and meet their
settlement obligations to DTC. Accordingly, based on this and the
earlier findings, we find that the Foreign Entity Policy Statement is
designed assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in
which are in the custody or control of DTC or for which it is
responsible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\12\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51385 (March 16, 2005),
70 FR 14736 (March 23, 2005) (File No. SR-FICC-2004-14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
in particular Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-DTC-2007-16), as modified by
Amendment No. 1, be and hereby is approved.
[[Page 48413]]
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19133 Filed 8-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P