Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Final Listing of 2009 Light Duty Truck Lines Subject to the Requirements of This Standard and Exempted Vehicle Lines for Model Year 2009, 47847-47850 [E8-18890]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–18946 Filed 8–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 541
[Docket No. NHTSA–2008–0049]
RIN 2127–AK31
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Final Listing of 2009 Light
Duty Truck Lines Subject to the
Requirements of This Standard and
Exempted Vehicle Lines for Model Year
2009
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule announces
NHTSA’s determination that there are
no new model year (MY) 2009 light duty
truck lines subject to the parts-marking
requirements of the Federal motor
vehicle theft prevention standard
because they have been determined by
the agency to be high-theft or because
they have a majority of interchangeable
parts with those of a passenger motor
vehicle line. This final rule also
identifies those vehicle lines that have
been granted an exemption from the
parts-marking requirements because the
vehicles are equipped with antitheft
devices determined to meet certain
statutory criteria.
DATES: Effective Date: The amendment
made by this final rule is effective
August 15, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Rosalind Proctor, Consumer Standards
Division, Office of International Policy,
Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs,
NHTSA, West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., (NVS–131, Room
W43–302), Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Proctor’s telephone number is (202)
366–0846. Her fax number is (202) 493–
0073.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
6, 2004, the agency published in the
Federal Register (69 FR 17960) a final
rule extending the parts-marking
requirements to certain vehicle lines
that were not previously subject to these
requirements, specifically (1) all lowtheft passenger car lines; (2) all lowtheft multipurpose passenger vehicle
(MPV) lines with a gross vehicle weight
rating (GVWR) of 6,000 pounds or less;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
and (3) low-theft light-duty truck (LDT)
lines with a GVWR of 6,000 pounds or
less that have major parts that are
interchangeable with a majority of the
covered major parts of passenger cars or
MPVs. The high-theft vehicle lines that
were previously exempted under 49
CFR part 543 on the grounds that they
were equipped with an antitheft device
as standard equipment were unaffected
by the April 2004 final rule. The agency
also stated that it would continue to
grant exemptions for one vehicle line
per manufacturer per model year. The
final rule was effective September 1,
2006. The final rule included a phasein provision which required at least 50
percent of the production volume not
subject to the current parts marking
requirements (excluding light duty
trucks) to have been marked by
September 1, 2006. The remaining
production volume not subject to the
current parts marking requirements
must have been marked by September 1,
2007 (see 70 FR 28843, May 19, 2005).
The purpose of the theft prevention
standard (49 CFR part 541) is to reduce
the incidence of motor vehicle theft by
facilitating the tracing and recovery of
parts from stolen vehicles. The standard
seeks to facilitate such tracing by
requiring that vehicle identification
numbers (VINs), VIN derivative
numbers, or other symbols be placed on
major component vehicle parts. The
theft prevention standard requires motor
vehicle manufacturers to inscribe or
affix VINs onto covered original
equipment major component parts, and
to inscribe or affix a symbol identifying
the manufacturer and a common symbol
identifying the replacement component
parts for those original equipment parts,
on all vehicle lines subject to the
requirements of the standard.
Section 33104(d) provides that once a
line has become subject to the theft
prevention standard, the line remains
subject to the requirements of the
standard unless it is exempted under
§ 33106. Section 33106 provides that a
manufacturer may petition to have a
line exempted from the requirements of
§ 33104, if the line is equipped with an
antitheft device as standard equipment.
The exemption is granted if NHTSA
determines that the antitheft device is
likely to be as effective as compliance
with the theft prevention standard in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
thefts.
The agency annually publishes the
names of those vehicle lines that have
been determined to be high theft
pursuant to 49 CFR part 541 and those
that are exempted from the theft
prevention standard under section
33104. Appendix A to Part 541
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47847
identifies those new light-duty truck
lines listed for the first time that will be
subject to the theft prevention standard
beginning in a given model year.
Appendix A–I to Part 541 identifies
those vehicle lines that are or have been
exempted from the theft prevention
standard.
On September 26, 2007, the final
listing of MY 2008 high-theft vehicle
lines was published in the Federal
Register (72 FR 54600). The final listing
identified that there again were no new
vehicle lines that became subject to the
theft prevention standard beginning
with the 2008 model year. For MY 2009,
there were no new light-duty truck lines
identified that became subject to the
theft prevention standard in accordance
with the procedures published in 49
CFR part 542.
For MY 2009, the list of lines that
have been exempted by the agency from
the parts-marking requirements of Part
541 includes nine vehicle lines newly
exempted in full. The nine exempted
vehicle lines are the Hyundai Genesis,
Mazda 5, Subaru Forester, Jeep
Wrangler, Chevrolet Equinox, Daimler
smart USA fortwo, Nissan Rogue, Ford
Escape, and Audi Q5.
We note that the agency removes from
the list being published in the Federal
Register each year certain vehicles lines
that have been discontinued more than
5 years ago. Therefore, the Chevrolet
Lumina/Monte Carlo (1996–1999) and
the Chevrolet Malibu (2001–2003) have
been removed from the Appendix A–I
listing. The agency will continue to
maintain a comprehensive database of
all exemptions on our Web site.
However, we believe that re-publishing
a list containing vehicle lines that have
not been in production for a
considerable period of time is
unnecessary.
The vehicle lines listed as being
exempt from the standard have
previously been exempted in
accordance with the procedures of 49
CFR part 543 and 49 U.S.C., 33106.
Therefore, NHTSA finds for good cause
that notice and opportunity for
comment on these listings are
unnecessary. Further, public comment
on the listing of selections and
exemptions is not contemplated by 49
U.S.C. Chapter 331. For the same
reasons, since this revised listing only
informs the public of previous agency
actions and does not impose additional
obligations on any party, NHTSA finds
for good cause that the amendment
made by this notice should be effective
as soon as it is published in the Federal
Register.
E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM
15AUR1
47848
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Impacts
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993), provides for making
determinations whether a regulatory
action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore
subject to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) review and to the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Order defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one that is likely
to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive Order.
This final rule was not reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. It is not
significant within the meaning of the
DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures. It will not impose any new
burdens on vehicle manufacturers. This
document informs the public of
previously granted exemptions. Since
the only purpose of this final rule is to
inform the public of previous actions
taken by the agency no new costs or
burdens will result.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires agencies
to evaluate the potential effects of their
rules on small businesses, small
organizations and small governmental
jurisdictions. I have considered the
effects of this rulemaking action under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act and
certify that it would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As
noted above, the effect of this final rule
is only to inform the public of agency’s
previous actions.
C. National Environmental Policy Act
NHTSA has analyzed this final rule
for the purposes of the National
Environmental Policy Act. The agency
has determined that implementation of
this action will not have any significant
impact on the quality of the human
environment. Accordingly, no
environmental assessment is required.
D. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The agency has analyzed this
rulemaking in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132 and has
determined that it does not have
sufficient federal implications to
warrant consultation with State and
local officials or the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement.
E. Unfunded Mandates Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
more than $100 million annually
($120.7 million as adjusted annually for
inflation with base year of 1995). The
assessment may be combined with other
assessments, as it is here.
This final rule will not result in
expenditures by State, local or tribal
governments or automobile
manufacturers and/or their suppliers of
more than $120.7 million annually. This
document informs the public of
previously granted exemptions. Since
the only purpose of this final rule is to
inform the public of previous actions
taken by the agency, no new costs or
burdens will result.
Manufacturer
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
BMW ...................................
CHRYSLER ........................
1 See
F. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
Pursuant to Executive Order 12988,
‘‘Civil Justice Reform,’’1 the agency has
considered whether this final rule has
any retroactive effect. We conclude that
it would not have such an effect. In
accordance with § 33118 when the Theft
Prevention Standard is in effect, a State
or political subdivision of a State may
not have a different motor vehicle theft
prevention standard for a motor vehicle
or major replacement part. 49 U.S.C.
33117 provides that judicial review of
this rule may be obtained pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 32909. Section 32909 does not
require submission of a petition for
reconsideration or other administrative
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of Transportation has
not submitted an information collection
request to OMB for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This rule does
not impose any new information
collection requirements on
manufacturers.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 541
Administrative practice and
procedure, Labeling, Motor vehicles,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I In consideration of the foregoing, 49
CFR part 541 is amended as follows:
PART 541—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 541
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33101, 33102, 33103,
33104, 33105 and 33106; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
2. In part 541, Appendix A–I is
revised to read as follows:
I
Appendix A–I to Part 541—Lines With
Antitheft Devices Which Are Exempted
From the Parts-Marking Requirements
of This Standard Pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 543
Subject lines
MINI.
X5.
Z4.
1 Car Line.
3 Car Line.
5 Car Line.
6 Car Line.
7 Car Line.
300C.
Jeep Grand Cherokee.
61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM
15AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Manufacturer
FORD MOTOR CO ............
GENERAL MOTORS .........
HONDA ...............................
HYUNDAI ...........................
ISUZU .................................
JAGUAR .............................
MAZDA ...............................
DAIMLER 2 ..........................
MITSUBISHI .......................
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
NISSAN ..............................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
47849
Subject lines
Jeep Wrangler.1
Conquest.
Town and Country MPV.
Dodge Charger.
Dodge Magnum.
Escape.1
Ford Five Hundred.
Ford Focus.
Lincoln Town Car.
Mustang.
Mercury Sable (2001–2004).
Mercury Grand Marquis.
Taurus (2000–2004).
Taurus X.
Buick Lucerne.
Buick LeSabre.
Buick LaCrosse/Century.
Buick Park Avenue.
Buick Regal/Century.
Cadillac DTS/Deville.
Cadillac STS/Seville.
Chevrolet Cavalier.
Chevrolet Classic.
Chevrolet Cobalt.
Chevrolet Corvette.
Chevrolet Equinox.1
Chevrolet Impala/Monte Carlo.
Chevrolet Malibu/Malibu Maxx.
Chevrolet Uplander.
Chevrolet Venture (2002–2004).
Oldsmobile Alero.
Oldsmobile Aurora.
Pontiac Bonneville.
Pontiac G6.
Pontiac Grand Am.
Pontiac Grand Prix.
Pontiac Sunfire.
Saturn Aura.
Acura CL.
Acura NSX.
Acura RL.
Acura TL.
Azera.
Genesis.3
Axiom.
XK.
3.
5.1
6.
CX–7.
CX–9.
MX–5 Miata.
Millenia.
Smart USA Fortwo.1
SL-Class (the models within this line are): 300SL, 500SL, 600SL, SL500, SL550, SL600, SL55, SL65.
S-Class/CL-Class (the models within this line are): S450, S500, S550, S600, S55, S65, CL500, CL600, CL55,
CL65.
C-Class/CLK-Class (the models within this line are): C240, C300, C350, CLK 350, CLK 550, CLK 63AMG.
E-Class/CLS Class (the models within this line are): E320/E320DT CDi, E350/E500/E55, CLS500/CLS55.
Eclipse.
Endeavor.
Galant.
Diamante.
Altima.
Maxima.
Pathfinder.
Quest.
Rogue.1
Sentra.
Versa
350Z.
Infiniti G35.
Infiniti I30.
Infiniti J30.
17:44 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM
15AUR1
47850
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Manufacturer
PORSCHE ..........................
SAAB ..................................
SUBARU .............................
SUZUKI ..............................
TOYOTA .............................
VOLKSWAGEN ..................
1 Granted
2 Formerly
Subject lines
Infiniti M30.
Infiniti M45.
Infiniti QX4.
Infiniti Q45.
911.
Boxster/Cayman.
9–3.
Forester.1
Impreza.
B9 Tribeca.
XL–7.
Lexus ES.
Lexus GS.
Lexus LS.
Lexus SC.
Audi 5000S.
Audi A4.
Audi Allroad.
Audi A6.
Audi Q5.1
New Beetle.
Cabrio.
Golf/GTI.
Jetta.
Passat.
an exemption from the parts marking requirements beginning with MY 2009.
known as Mercedes-Benz.
Issued on: August 11, 2008.
Nathaniel M. Beuse,
Office of Crash Avoidance Standards,
Director.
[FR Doc. E8–18890 Filed 8–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 040205043–4043–01]
RIN 0648–XI45
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Snappergrouper Fishery of the South Atlantic;
Closure of the 2008 Commercial
Fishery for Golden Tilefish in the
South Atlantic
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS closes the commercial
fishery for golden tilefish in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the
South Atlantic. NMFS has determined
that the quota for the commercial
fishery for golden tilefish will have been
reached by August 17, 2008. This
closure is necessary to protect the
golden tilefish resource.
17:44 Aug 14, 2008
Jkt 214001
The
snapper-grouper fishery of the South
Atlantic is managed under the Fishery
Management Plan for the SnapperGrouper Fishery of the South Atlantic
Region (FMP). The FMP was prepared
by the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council and is
implemented under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) by regulations
at 50 CFR part 622. Those regulations
set the commercial quota for golden
tilefish in the South Atlantic at 295,000
lb (133,810 kg) for the current fishing
year, January 1 through December 31,
2008.
Under 50 CFR 622.43(a), NMFS is
required to close the commercial fishery
for a species or species group when the
quota for that species or species group
is reached, or is projected to be reached,
by filing a notification to that effect with
the Office of the Federal Register. Based
on current statistics, NMFS has
determined that the available
commercial quota of 295,000 lb (133,810
kg) for golden tilefish will be reached on
or before August 17, 2008. Accordingly,
NMFS is closing the commercial fishery
for golden tilefish in the South Atlantic
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Closure is effective 12:01 a.m.,
local time, August 17, 2008, until 12:01
a.m., local time, on January 1, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Britni Tokotch, telephone 727–824–
5305, fax 727–824–5308, e-mail
Britni.Tokotch@noaa.gov.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EEZ from 12:01 a.m., local time, on
August 17, 2008, until 12:01 a.m., local
time, on January 1, 2009. The operator
of a vessel with a valid commercial
vessel permit for snapper-grouper
having golden tilefish aboard must have
landed and bartered, traded, or sold
such golden tilefish prior to 12:01 a.m.,
local time, August 17, 2008.
During the closure, the bag and
possession limits specified in 50 CFR
622.39(b) apply to all harvest or
possession of golden tilefish in or from
the South Atlantic EEZ, and the sale or
purchase of golden tilefish taken from
the EEZ is prohibited. The prohibition
on sale or purchase does not apply to
sale or purchase of golden tilefish that
were harvested, landed ashore, and sold
prior to 12:01 a.m., local time, August
17, 2008, and were held in cold storage
by a dealer or processor.
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA,
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such prior notice
and opportunity for public comment is
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest. Such procedures would be
unnecessary because the rule itself has
already been subject to notice and
comment, and all that remains is to
notify the public of the closure.
E:\FR\FM\15AUR1.SGM
15AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 159 (Friday, August 15, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47847-47850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18890]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 541
[Docket No. NHTSA-2008-0049]
RIN 2127-AK31
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Final Listing of
2009 Light Duty Truck Lines Subject to the Requirements of This
Standard and Exempted Vehicle Lines for Model Year 2009
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule announces NHTSA's determination that there are
no new model year (MY) 2009 light duty truck lines subject to the
parts-marking requirements of the Federal motor vehicle theft
prevention standard because they have been determined by the agency to
be high-theft or because they have a majority of interchangeable parts
with those of a passenger motor vehicle line. This final rule also
identifies those vehicle lines that have been granted an exemption from
the parts-marking requirements because the vehicles are equipped with
antitheft devices determined to meet certain statutory criteria.
DATES: Effective Date: The amendment made by this final rule is
effective August 15, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Rosalind Proctor, Consumer
Standards Division, Office of International Policy, Fuel Economy and
Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
(NVS-131, Room W43-302), Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Proctor's telephone
number is (202) 366-0846. Her fax number is (202) 493-0073.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 6, 2004, the agency published in
the Federal Register (69 FR 17960) a final rule extending the parts-
marking requirements to certain vehicle lines that were not previously
subject to these requirements, specifically (1) all low-theft passenger
car lines; (2) all low-theft multipurpose passenger vehicle (MPV) lines
with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 6,000 pounds or less; and
(3) low-theft light-duty truck (LDT) lines with a GVWR of 6,000 pounds
or less that have major parts that are interchangeable with a majority
of the covered major parts of passenger cars or MPVs. The high-theft
vehicle lines that were previously exempted under 49 CFR part 543 on
the grounds that they were equipped with an antitheft device as
standard equipment were unaffected by the April 2004 final rule. The
agency also stated that it would continue to grant exemptions for one
vehicle line per manufacturer per model year. The final rule was
effective September 1, 2006. The final rule included a phase-in
provision which required at least 50 percent of the production volume
not subject to the current parts marking requirements (excluding light
duty trucks) to have been marked by September 1, 2006. The remaining
production volume not subject to the current parts marking requirements
must have been marked by September 1, 2007 (see 70 FR 28843, May 19,
2005).
The purpose of the theft prevention standard (49 CFR part 541) is
to reduce the incidence of motor vehicle theft by facilitating the
tracing and recovery of parts from stolen vehicles. The standard seeks
to facilitate such tracing by requiring that vehicle identification
numbers (VINs), VIN derivative numbers, or other symbols be placed on
major component vehicle parts. The theft prevention standard requires
motor vehicle manufacturers to inscribe or affix VINs onto covered
original equipment major component parts, and to inscribe or affix a
symbol identifying the manufacturer and a common symbol identifying the
replacement component parts for those original equipment parts, on all
vehicle lines subject to the requirements of the standard.
Section 33104(d) provides that once a line has become subject to
the theft prevention standard, the line remains subject to the
requirements of the standard unless it is exempted under Sec. 33106.
Section 33106 provides that a manufacturer may petition to have a line
exempted from the requirements of Sec. 33104, if the line is equipped
with an antitheft device as standard equipment. The exemption is
granted if NHTSA determines that the antitheft device is likely to be
as effective as compliance with the theft prevention standard in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle thefts.
The agency annually publishes the names of those vehicle lines that
have been determined to be high theft pursuant to 49 CFR part 541 and
those that are exempted from the theft prevention standard under
section 33104. Appendix A to Part 541 identifies those new light-duty
truck lines listed for the first time that will be subject to the theft
prevention standard beginning in a given model year. Appendix A-I to
Part 541 identifies those vehicle lines that are or have been exempted
from the theft prevention standard.
On September 26, 2007, the final listing of MY 2008 high-theft
vehicle lines was published in the Federal Register (72 FR 54600). The
final listing identified that there again were no new vehicle lines
that became subject to the theft prevention standard beginning with the
2008 model year. For MY 2009, there were no new light-duty truck lines
identified that became subject to the theft prevention standard in
accordance with the procedures published in 49 CFR part 542.
For MY 2009, the list of lines that have been exempted by the
agency from the parts-marking requirements of Part 541 includes nine
vehicle lines newly exempted in full. The nine exempted vehicle lines
are the Hyundai Genesis, Mazda 5, Subaru Forester, Jeep Wrangler,
Chevrolet Equinox, Daimler smart USA fortwo, Nissan Rogue, Ford Escape,
and Audi Q5.
We note that the agency removes from the list being published in
the Federal Register each year certain vehicles lines that have been
discontinued more than 5 years ago. Therefore, the Chevrolet Lumina/
Monte Carlo (1996-1999) and the Chevrolet Malibu (2001-2003) have been
removed from the Appendix A-I listing. The agency will continue to
maintain a comprehensive database of all exemptions on our Web site.
However, we believe that re-publishing a list containing vehicle lines
that have not been in production for a considerable period of time is
unnecessary.
The vehicle lines listed as being exempt from the standard have
previously been exempted in accordance with the procedures of 49 CFR
part 543 and 49 U.S.C., 33106. Therefore, NHTSA finds for good cause
that notice and opportunity for comment on these listings are
unnecessary. Further, public comment on the listing of selections and
exemptions is not contemplated by 49 U.S.C. Chapter 331. For the same
reasons, since this revised listing only informs the public of previous
agency actions and does not impose additional obligations on any party,
NHTSA finds for good cause that the amendment made by this notice
should be effective as soon as it is published in the Federal Register.
[[Page 47848]]
Regulatory Impacts
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), provides for making determinations whether a
regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) review and to the requirements of the
Executive Order. The Order defines a ``significant regulatory action''
as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order.
This final rule was not reviewed under Executive Order 12866. It is
not significant within the meaning of the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures. It will not impose any new burdens on vehicle
manufacturers. This document informs the public of previously granted
exemptions. Since the only purpose of this final rule is to inform the
public of previous actions taken by the agency no new costs or burdens
will result.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires agencies to evaluate the potential effects of their rules on
small businesses, small organizations and small governmental
jurisdictions. I have considered the effects of this rulemaking action
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act and certify that it would not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. As noted above, the effect of this final rule is only to
inform the public of agency's previous actions.
C. National Environmental Policy Act
NHTSA has analyzed this final rule for the purposes of the National
Environmental Policy Act. The agency has determined that implementation
of this action will not have any significant impact on the quality of
the human environment. Accordingly, no environmental assessment is
required.
D. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The agency has analyzed this rulemaking in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 and has
determined that it does not have sufficient federal implications to
warrant consultation with State and local officials or the preparation
of a federalism summary impact statement.
E. Unfunded Mandates Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires agencies to
prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits and other effects
of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate likely to
result in the expenditure by State, local or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than $100 million annually
($120.7 million as adjusted annually for inflation with base year of
1995). The assessment may be combined with other assessments, as it is
here.
This final rule will not result in expenditures by State, local or
tribal governments or automobile manufacturers and/or their suppliers
of more than $120.7 million annually. This document informs the public
of previously granted exemptions. Since the only purpose of this final
rule is to inform the public of previous actions taken by the agency,
no new costs or burdens will result.
F. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
Pursuant to Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform,''\1\ the
agency has considered whether this final rule has any retroactive
effect. We conclude that it would not have such an effect. In
accordance with Sec. 33118 when the Theft Prevention Standard is in
effect, a State or political subdivision of a State may not have a
different motor vehicle theft prevention standard for a motor vehicle
or major replacement part. 49 U.S.C. 33117 provides that judicial
review of this rule may be obtained pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 32909.
Section 32909 does not require submission of a petition for
reconsideration or other administrative proceedings before parties may
file suit in court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Department of Transportation has not submitted an information
collection request to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork
reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). This rule
does not impose any new information collection requirements on
manufacturers.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 541
Administrative practice and procedure, Labeling, Motor vehicles,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
In consideration of the foregoing, 49 CFR part 541 is amended as
follows:
PART 541--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 541 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33101, 33102, 33103, 33104, 33105 and
33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
0
2. In part 541, Appendix A-I is revised to read as follows:
Appendix A-I to Part 541--Lines With Antitheft Devices Which Are
Exempted From the Parts-Marking Requirements of This Standard Pursuant
to 49 CFR Part 543
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Subject lines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BMW....................................... MINI.
X5.
Z4.
1 Car Line.
3 Car Line.
5 Car Line.
6 Car Line.
7 Car Line.
CHRYSLER.................................. 300C.
Jeep Grand Cherokee.
[[Page 47849]]
Jeep Wrangler.\1\
Conquest.
Town and Country MPV.
Dodge Charger.
Dodge Magnum.
FORD MOTOR CO............................. Escape.\1\
Ford Five Hundred.
Ford Focus.
Lincoln Town Car.
Mustang.
Mercury Sable (2001-2004).
Mercury Grand Marquis.
Taurus (2000-2004).
Taurus X.
GENERAL MOTORS............................ Buick Lucerne.
Buick LeSabre.
Buick LaCrosse/Century.
Buick Park Avenue.
Buick Regal/Century.
Cadillac DTS/Deville.
Cadillac STS/Seville.
Chevrolet Cavalier.
Chevrolet Classic.
Chevrolet Cobalt.
Chevrolet Corvette.
Chevrolet Equinox.\1\
Chevrolet Impala/Monte
Carlo.
Chevrolet Malibu/Malibu
Maxx.
Chevrolet Uplander.
Chevrolet Venture (2002-
2004).
Oldsmobile Alero.
Oldsmobile Aurora.
Pontiac Bonneville.
Pontiac G6.
Pontiac Grand Am.
Pontiac Grand Prix.
Pontiac Sunfire.
Saturn Aura.
HONDA..................................... Acura CL.
Acura NSX.
Acura RL.
Acura TL.
HYUNDAI................................... Azera.
Genesis.\3\
ISUZU..................................... Axiom.
JAGUAR.................................... XK.
MAZDA..................................... 3.
5.\1\
6.
CX-7.
CX-9.
MX-5 Miata.
Millenia.
DAIMLER \2\............................... Smart USA Fortwo.\1\
SL-Class (the models within
this line are): 300SL,
500SL, 600SL, SL500, SL550,
SL600, SL55, SL65.
S-Class/CL-Class (the models
within this line are):
S450, S500, S550, S600,
S55, S65, CL500, CL600,
CL55, CL65.
C-Class/CLK-Class (the
models within this line
are): C240, C300, C350, CLK
350, CLK 550, CLK 63AMG.
E-Class/CLS Class (the
models within this line
are): E320/E320DT CDi, E350/
E500/E55, CLS500/CLS55.
MITSUBISHI................................ Eclipse.
Endeavor.
Galant.
Diamante.
NISSAN.................................... Altima.
Maxima.
Pathfinder.
Quest.
Rogue.\1\
Sentra.
Versa
350Z.
Infiniti G35.
Infiniti I30.
Infiniti J30.
[[Page 47850]]
Infiniti M30.
Infiniti M45.
Infiniti QX4.
Infiniti Q45.
PORSCHE................................... 911.
Boxster/Cayman.
SAAB...................................... 9-3.
SUBARU.................................... Forester.\1\
Impreza.
B9 Tribeca.
SUZUKI.................................... XL-7.
TOYOTA.................................... Lexus ES.
Lexus GS.
Lexus LS.
Lexus SC.
VOLKSWAGEN................................ Audi 5000S.
Audi A4.
Audi Allroad.
Audi A6.
Audi Q5.\1\
New Beetle.
Cabrio.
Golf/GTI.
Jetta.
Passat.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Granted an exemption from the parts marking requirements beginning
with MY 2009.
\2\ Formerly known as Mercedes-Benz.
Issued on: August 11, 2008.
Nathaniel M. Beuse,
Office of Crash Avoidance Standards, Director.
[FR Doc. E8-18890 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P